=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-2761/HAICTA_2020_paper80 |storemode=property |title=Could Irrigation and N-fertilization Affect Saffron Yield? |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2761/HAICTA_2020_paper80.pdf |volume=Vol-2761 |authors=Kyriakos Giannoulis,Elpiniki Skoufogianni,Dimitrios Bartzialis,Alexandra Solomou,Anastasia Malamoglou,Nicholaos Danalatos |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/haicta/GiannoulisSBSMD20 }} ==Could Irrigation and N-fertilization Affect Saffron Yield?== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2761/HAICTA_2020_paper80.pdf
      Could Irrigation and N-fertilization Affect Saffron
                          Yield?

   Kyriakos D. Giannoulis1, Elpiniki Skoufogianni1, Dimitrios Bartzialis1, Alexandra
          D. Solomou2, Anastasia Malamoglou1, Nicholaos G. Danalatos1
         1
          University of Thessaly, Department of Agriculture Crop Production and Rural
       Environment. Fytocou Str., 38446 Volos, Greece; e-mails: kgiannoulis@uth.gr;
                               kyriakos.giannoulis@gmail.com
     2
      Institute of Mediterranean and Forest Ecosystems, Hellenic Agricultural Organization
                      “Demeter”, N. Chlorou 1, 11528, Athens, Greece



       Abstract. Crocus sativus belongs to the Iridaceae family, and it is known as
       saffron. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of irrigation and N-
       fertilization on the produced number and weight of flowers and stigmas. A field
       experiment was established for the purposes of the study in a clay loam soil of
       moderately fertile on 2018 while the results concern measurements made in
       2019. A split-plot experimental design was used with main factor the irrigation
       (I1: rainfed, I2: 75% ETo and I3: 100% ETo) and sub-factor the N-fertilization
       (N1: 0, N2: 40 and N3: 80 kg ha-1 of the 35-0-0) under 9 replications. It was
       found that 1 kg of dried stigmas is produced through an average of 159.000
       flowers. Irrigation was found to be the factor which affected positively the
       flower number and led to a doubling of stigmas yield, while N-fertilization did
       not have any statistically significant difference.

       Keywords: saffron; irrigation; n-fertilization; stigmas; yield.



1 Introduction

   A perennial aromatic and pharmaceutical crop, member of the Iridaceae family
(Arslan et al., 2013), which has been used as a spice and in traditional medicine is
Crocus sativus L. Crocus is worldwide known as saffron and it is cultivated in many
hectares in Iran resulting in the increase of farmers income (Mashayekhi et al., 2006;
Mollafilabi, 2006). Saffron is also cultivated in Mediterranean basin and India
(Fernandez, 2004) and it prefers mild winter and dry-hot summers. Saffron anthesis
period lasts from 10 to 25 days extremely depending on climatic conditions (middle of
October till the first ten days of November). Crocus propagation take place only by
corms and each plant can reach 20–30 cm height (Mehraj et al., 2015).
   Saffron product is the stigmas of the flowers, and its yield and flower number are
depended on irrigation and nutrient supply, on plant density as well as on the day and
night site temperature (Gresta et al., 2009; Kumar et al., 2009; Mollafilabi et al., 2013;
Koocheki et al., 2014; Koocheki and Seyyedi, 2015; Behdani et al., 2016). Saffron
yield varies according to growing site and it is reported that dried stigmas yield ranges




                                             526
from 2 to 29 kg ha-1 (Alonso et al., 2000) which results in 90-2,175 of fresh flowers
(Vignolini et al., 2008; Schmidt et al., 2007; Serrano-Diaz et al., 2012).
   Crocus has many uses. Except for medicine industry, it is used in food industry, in
distillery and in coloring (Javadi et al. 2013). Crocus stigmas is the most expensive
worldwide agricultural product worldwide (Gohari et al., 2013; Lim, 2014), which has
also increased cultivation costs due to the requirement of hand labor during its harvest
period (Gresta et al., 2008).
The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of irrigation and nitrogen
fertilization on Crocus sativus L yield during its second growing year.


2 Materials and Methods

    A field experiment was established in Neos Skopos, Serres in a clay loam soil of
moderately fertile, alkaline and high in phosphorus in August 2018. The results
concern the measurements made in October 2019 where the cultivation was in the
second growing year.
    A split plot experimental design was used with main factor the irrigation (I1: rainfed,
I2: 75% ETo and I3: 100% ETo) and sub-factor the n-fertilization (N1: 0, N2: 40 and
N3: 80 kg ha-1 of the 35-0-0) under 9 replications (blocks). A basic fertilization with
400 kg ha-1 of the 11-15-15 took place in March for all plots. Water supply was carried
out during September-October using a micro-sprinkler irrigation system (Pall Special
Spray with characteristics 33L*h-1) and the water quantity was 48 mm and 36 mm for
the full irrigated treatments (100% ETo) and the reduced irrigated treatments (75%
ETo) respectively.
    All measures (number of flowers, fresh flower weight and stigmas fresh and dry
weight) were taken during harvest period (20 days harvest period at the end of October
till the middle of November for both years) on a daily basis, from the center lines of
each plot cutting 1 m2 so as to avoid any border effect, while the rest of the flowers of
the plot were moved. Samples were weighed at once (flower and stigmas weight) and
then stigmas were air dried.
    All measures were analyzed using the statistical package GenStat (7th Edition) and
the LSD.05 was used as the test criterion for assessing differences between means (Steel
and Torrie, 1982) of the main and/or interaction effects.


3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Number and fresh weight of flowers

   As it has been mentioned the soil of the study area is moderately fertile, alkaline
and high in phosphorus, which is ideal for crocus cultivation due to its high P-content
(Daneshmandi and Seyyedi, 2019).
   In the case of the number of flowers collected during the harvest period, there was
found a significant statistical difference was found between the rainfed and the




                                           527
irrigated treatments (Table 1) with the maximum flower number (324 flowers per m2)
for the full irrigation. In the case of the N-fertilization and the interaction of irrigation
with N-fertilization, no significant statistical differences were found. The higher
number per m2 was found in the case of full irrigated and unfertilized treatments (I3N1;
Table 1).
    As it was expected due to the higher flower number for the irrigated treatments, the
fresh weight of the flowers was also statistically significant higher in the same
treatments (Table 1). It was also noticed that even if the higher flower number was
found in the case of full irrigated and unfertilized treatments (I3N1), the higher fresh
weight was found in the case of the full irrigated treatments of the higher N-
fertilization (I3N3; Table 1).

Table 1. Saffron quantitative characteristics as affected by irrigation and N-fertilization.

                             Flower      F. Weight      F. Weight     D. Weight
                             Number      Flowers        Stigmas       Stigmas
                             / m2        (kg/ha)        (kg/ha)       (kg/ha)
               I1                 205            137          68.2             11.8
               I2                 309            236         115.1             19.1
               I3                 324            255         122.8             22.4
               LSD.05             58.5            54         23.11             5.78
               N1                 294            204         105.8             19.6
               N2                 263            189          96.7             16.4
               N3                 281            235         103.7             17.3
               LSD.05               ns            ns             ns              Ns
               I1N1               201            131          66.6             10.8
               I1N2               214            132            72             11.1
               I1N3               201            148          66.1             13.5
               I2N1               344            242         125.9             22.7
               I2N2               251            189          92.7             15.9
               I2N3               331            277         126.7             18.7
               I3N1               338            238         124.8             25.3
               I3N2               325            247         125.3             22.1
               I3N3               309            281         118.4             19.8
               LSD.05               ns            ns             ns              Ns
               CV (%)             19.9          27.1          21.7             21.8




                                               528
3.2 Fresh and dry weight of stigmas

    Fresh and dry weight of stigmas was statistically significant higher in the case of
irrigated treatments, while N-fertilization did not have statistically significant effect.
Maximum dry weight (25.3 kg ha-1) was produced for the full irrigated treatment
without N-fertilization (I3N1; Table 1). Furthermore, it was noticed that N-fertilization
had a negative effect producing lower dry stigmas yield comparing to the control.
Finally, it was found that full irrigation yielded double dry stigmas production
compared to rainfed treatments.
    Ghanbari et al. (2019), reported that flower number is the most important
characteristic affecting stigma yield. Moreover, it is reported that an average of
160.000 saffron flowers are needed to produce 1 kg of dried stigmas (Schmidt et al.,
2007; Vignolini et al., 2008), which is in agreement with the findings of the current
study where an average of 159.000 flowers produced 1 kg of dried stigmas.
Moreover, the influence of intensive agronomic practices such as irrigation which
strongly affects stigmas yield is also reported (Gresta et al., 2009; Koocheki et al.,
2014; Behdani et al., 2016) and was also found in the current study.


4 Conclusions

   It was found that 1 kg of dried stigmas is produced through an average of 159.000
flowers, which indicates that flower number is the most important feature of Crocus
sativus L., and the reason for the high selling price of the saffron product considering
the effort it takes to harvest this number of flowers. Irrigation was found to be the
factor which affected the flower number positively and led to a doubling of stigmas
yield, while N-fertilization did not any have any statistically significant difference. As
a general conclusion could be that Crocus sativa L., is a promising perennial crop
characterized by satisfactory yield with irrigation being the most crucial factor.


Acknowledgments. This work was supported by the Department of Agriculture, Crop
Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Greece.


References

1. Alonso, G.L., Salinas, M.R., Sánchez-Fernández, M.A. and Garijo, J. (2000)
   Physical parameters in controlling saffron quality. Food Sci. Technol. Int., 6, p.
   59–65.
2. Arslan, N., Ipek, A., Rahimi, A. and Ipek, G. (2013) The effects of placement
   position and corm size of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) on stigma and corm yields in
   Ankara conditions. J. Herb. Drugs, 4, p. 1–6.




                                          529
3. Behdani, M.A., Al-Ahmadi, M.J. and Fallahi, H.R. (2016) Biomass partitioning
    during the life cycle of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) using regression models. J. Crop.
    Sci. Biotechno., 19, p. 71–76.
4. Daneshmandi, M.S. and Seyyedi, S.M. (2019) Nutrient availability and saffron
    corms growth affected by composted pistachio residues and commercial poultry
    manure in a calcareous soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan. 50, p. 1465–1475.
5. Fernandez, J.A. (2004) Biology, biotechnology and biomedicine of saffron. Recent
    Research in Development Plant Science, 2, p. 127–159.
6. Ghanbari, J., khajoei-negad, Gh., Van Ruth, S. and Aghighi, S. (2019) The
    possibility for improvement of flowering, corm properties, bioactive compounds,
    and nutritional regimes. Ind. Crop. Prod., 135, p. 301–310.
7. Gohari, A.R., Saeidnia, S. and Mahmoodabadi, M.K. (2013) An overview on
    saffron, phytochemicals, and medicinal properties. Pharmacogn. Rev., 7, p. 61–66.
8. Gresta, F., Avola, G., Lombardo, G.M., Siracusa, L. and Ruberto, G. (2009)
    Analysis of flowering, stigmas yield and qualitative traits of saffron (Crocus
    sativus L.) as affected by environmental conditions. Sci. Hortic-Amsterdam, 119,
    p. 320–324.
9. Gresta, F., Lombardo, G.M., Siracusa, L. and Ruberto, G. (2008) Saffron, an
    alternative crop for sustainable agricultural systems. A review. 28. Springer
    Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA. Agron. Sustain. Dev., p. 95–112.
10. Javadi, B., Sahebkar, A. and Emami, S.A. (2013) A survey on saffron in major
    Islamic traditional medicine books. Iran J. Basic Med. Sci., 16, p. 1-11.
11. Koocheki, A., Jahani, M., Tabrizi, L. and Mohammadabadi, A.A. (2011)
    Investigation on the effect of biofertilizer, chemical fertilizer and plant density on
    yield and corm criteria of saffron Crocus sativus L. J. Soil Water, 25, p. 196–206.
12. Koocheki, A. and Seyyedi, S.M. (2015) Relationship between nitrogen and
    phosphorus use efficiency in saffron (Crocus sativus L.) as affected by mother
    corm size and fertilization. Ind. Crop. Prod., 71, p. 128–137.
13. Koocheki, A., Seyyedi, S.M. and Jamshid Eyni, M. (2014) Irrigation levels and
    dense planting affect flower yield and phosphorus concentration of saffron corms
    under semi-arid region of Mashhad, Northeast Iran. Sci. Hortic-Amsterdam, 180,
    p. 147–155.
14. Kumar, R., Singh, V., Devi, K., Sharma, M., Singh, M.K. and Ahuja, P.S. (2009)
    State of art of saffron (Crocus sativus L) agronomy, a comprehensive review. Food
    Rev. Int., 25, p. 44-85.
15. Lage, M. and Cantrell, C. (2009) Quantification of saffron (Crocus sativus L.)
    metabolites crocins, picrocrocin and safranal for quality determination of the spice
    grown under different environmental Moroccan conditions. Sci. Hortic-
    Amsterdam, 121, p. 366–373.
16. Lim, T.K. (2014) Edible Medicinal and Non Medicinal Plants. Flowers. Crocus
    Sativus, vol. 8. Springer Netherlands, New York, London, pp. 77–136.
17. Mashayekhi, K., Soltani, A. and Kamkar, B. (2006) The relationship between corm
    weight and total flower and leaf number in saffron. In: 2nd International




                                          530
    Symposium on saffron Biology and Technology, Mashhad, Iran,28–30 October,
    pp. 93–96.
18. Mehraj, S.S., Kamili, A.N., Bhat, G.A. and Nazir, R. (2015) Resource allocation
    in dormant corms of Crocus sativus L. and their heavy metal analysis. Int. J. Adv.
    Res., 3, p. 27–33.
19. Mollafilabi, A. (2006) Saffron production technology. In: Kafi, M., Koocheki, A.,
    Rashed Mohassel, H., Nassiri, M., (Eds.), Saffron (Crocus sativus) Production and
    Processing. Science Publishers, New Hampshire, pp. 59–78.
20. Mollafilabi, A., Koocheki, A., Moeinerad, H. and Kooshki, L. (2013) Effect of
    plant density and weight of corm on yield and yield components of saffron (Crocus
    sativus L.) under soil, hydroponic and plastic tunnel cultivation. Acta Hortic., 997,
    p. 51–58.
21. Schmidt, M., Betti, G., Hensel, A. (2007) Saffron in phytotherapy: pharmacology
    and clinical uses. Wien. Med. Wochenschr., 157, p. 315–319.
22. Serrano-Díaz, J., Sánchez, A.M., Maggi, L., Martínez-Tomé, M., García-Diz, L.,
    Murcia, M.A. and Alonso, G.L. (2012) Increasing the applications of Crocus
    sativus flowers as natural antioxidants. J. Food Sci., 77, p. C1162–C1168.
23. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. (1982) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A
    Biometrical Approach, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, Inc (eds), 633.
24. Vignolini, P., Heimler, D., Pinelli, P., Ieri, F., Sciullo, A. and Romani, A. (2008)
    Characterization of by-products of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) production. Nat.
    Prod. Commun., 3, p. 1959 – 1962.




                                          531