=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-2763/CPT2020_paper_p-3 |storemode=property |title=To R- geometry of plants |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2763/CPT2020_paper_p-3.pdf |volume=Vol-2763 |authors=Vyacheslav Moiseyev }} ==To R- geometry of plants== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2763/CPT2020_paper_p-3.pdf
                                             To R- geometry of plants
                                                     V.I. Moiseyev
                                                     vimo@list.ru
                  Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry by A.I. Evdokimov, Moscow, Russia

     The article gives a definition of the organic form as an infinite-similar and self-similar structure, which is based on the increased
unity of the whole and the part - holomereological symmetry. A model of plant forms as organic forms is proposed, which are based on
spherocylinders โ€“ infinite-similar cylindrical volumes joined with hemispheres at their ends. The data on the golden wurf in the metric
of plant stems are presented. The cirrus leaf model in MathCad is briefly described. The problem of the organic form, the form of living
organisms, is a long-discussed topic in biology, in particular, in morphology. There is a lot of empirical material relating to the
description of a huge variety of biological forms. However, until now, the laws of the organic form and its specificity, in comparison
with the forms of inorganic bodies, continue to raise more questions than answers. It is clear that organic forms are special, they have
their own laws and types of morphogenesis. But what is the essence of these features, what is the logic of their organization, all this is
still largely unclear.
     Key words: R-analysis, R-geometry, organic form, infinite-similarity, self-similarity, holomerological symmetry, spherocylinder,
golden wurf

                                                                             โˆ’1                                               โˆ’1
                                                                        ๏ฟฝ๐‘…๐‘…๐‘€๐‘€(๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ÿ)  , ๐œ‘๐œ‘, ๐œƒ๐œƒ๏ฟฝ = (๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ÿ โˆ— , ๐œ‘๐œ‘, ๐œƒ๐œƒ), where ๐‘…๐‘…๐‘€๐‘€(๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ÿ)       is a scalar R-
1. Introduction
                                                                        function that isomorphically compresses the real axis R
    The author develops a new approach to the                           into the interval (-M,+ M).
interpretation of the essence of organic forms, suggesting                     For example:
that these forms are small spaces with its symmetry,                           R+1M(x) = (2๐‘€๐‘€/๐œ‹๐œ‹) ๐‘ก๐‘ก๐‘ก๐‘ก (๐œ‹๐œ‹๐œ‹๐œ‹/2๐‘€๐‘€) is the direct R-function,
topology and metric, featuring considerably from those of                      R-1M(x) = (2๐‘€๐‘€/๐œ‹๐œ‹) ๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘Ž๐‘Ž (๐œ‹๐œ‹๐œ‹๐œ‹/2๐‘€๐‘€) is the inverse R-
the environment. For the expression of such specificity, a              function.
new mathematical tool, so-called R-analysis (relativistic                      Similarly, a cylindrical volume C* = R-1C*(C) with
analysis of quantity) is used, which is based on the                    radius M and height 2H can be built, where C is the space
isomorphic mappings (R-functions) between the finite                    with the cylindrical coordinate system (ฯ, ฯ•, z), and
structures and their infinite prototypes. On this basis, a                                        โˆ’1
                                                                        ๐‘…๐‘…๐ถ๐ถโˆ’1โˆ— (๐œŒ๐œŒ, ๐œ‘๐œ‘, ๐‘ง๐‘ง) = ๏ฟฝ๐‘…๐‘…๐‘š๐‘š(๐œŒ๐œŒ)          โˆ’1
                                                                                                          , ๐œ‘๐œ‘, ๐‘…๐‘…๐ป๐ป(๐‘ง๐‘ง) ๏ฟฝ = (๐œŒ๐œŒโˆ— , ๐œ‘๐œ‘, ๐‘ง๐‘ง โˆ— ).
new interpretation of the basic constructions of                               To model plant forms we will further use a
mathematical analysis is proposed, in particular, the                   spherocylinder - a cylindrical R-space C*, to the upper and
calculus of infinitesimals [1-5].                                       lower bases of which the upper S+* and lower S-* R-
    Applications of the ideas of R-analysis to geometry                 hemispheres are attached, and they obtained from the R-
allow to develop a new direction, which may be                          sphere S* by narrowing zenith angle ฮธ to values ฮธโˆˆ[0,ฯ€/2]
conventionally designated as "R-geometry" [6]. It is based              and ฮธโˆˆ[ฯ€/2,ฯ€] respectively (fig. 1).
on the relation between infinite spaces and finite volumes
isomorphic to them (R-spaces). It is assumed that the
shape of living organisms is a multi-level R-space,
compiled by protoforms, as repeated at different levels
one typed structures [7].
    In this paper, organic forms of plant organisms are
chosen for modeling as simpler and more geometrized
types of living forms. But it is assumed that the results
obtained for plants can be further generalized for all
organic forms.

2. Materials and methods
    When modeling organic forms, it is proposed to use
isomorphic mappings (R-functions) Rยฑ1V* between finite                                          Fig. 1. Spherocylinder
3D-volumes V* and their infinite prototypical spaces V,
where V* = R-1V*(V), V = R+1V*(V*). In this case, for the               3. Literature review
final volume V*, a coordinate system can be determined
that most economically and organically expresses the                        The specificity of the organic form was noted for a
internal geometry of the volume V*. Such a coordinate                   long time. For example, in the research of I.V. Goethe, a
system can be called a natural (selected) coordinate                    theory of metamorphosis was proposed, i.e. the
system for the R-space V*. In simpler cases, vector R-                  transformation of one plant organ into another. Goethe
functions can be reduced to scalar ones. For example, if                also believed that the protoform of the plant is the leaf
the 3D-sphere S* with radius M>0 is considered as the                   from which its other organs originate: calyx, corolla,
volume V*, then it is natural to consider the spherical                 stamens, and pestle. An attempt to express plant forms as
                                                                        formed on the basis of a single protoform is also vividly
coordinate system (r, ฯ•, ฮธ) in the space S to be the selected
                                                                        presented in the so-called telome theory of the German
system     for S*,    assuming       that    ๐‘…๐‘…๐‘†๐‘†โˆ’1
                                                  โˆ— (๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ÿ, ๐œ‘๐œ‘, ๐œƒ๐œƒ) =
                                                                        botanist V.Zimmermann [8], in accordance of which all


Copyright ยฉ 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY
4.0)
the basic forms of the plant are formed on the basis of                  finite. These kinds of invariants can be called fin-
cylindrical structures: terminal (telomes) or intermediate               infinites, or even shorter: finfinites.
(mesomes). V.I.Vernadsky noted the peculiarity of organic                    In this case, in the most concise way, it can be argued
forms associated with the presence of their own symmetry                 that the organic form is a finfinite holomerone.
and local geometry. We can not pass the studies of
morphogenesis in living organisms by D'Arcy Thompson,                    5. Plant as an organic form
presented in his famous work, "On Growth and Form" [9].                      The abstract idea of an organic form, as defined above,
He puts forward the idea of regular transformations of                   can be more specifically implemented in the mathematical
some species forms into others, continuing the principles                modeling of a generalized plant as a system of coordinated
of metamorphosis on the supraorganismic level. The paper                 spherocylinders.
of S.V.Petukhov [10] introduced the concept of the gold                      According to Zimmermann's telome theory, a plant is
wurf W (a,b,c) = (a + b)(b + c)/b(a + b + c) = ฯ•2/2 โ‰ˆ                    a system of coordinated cylinders. However, the
1.309, where a, b, c are the values of three adjacent                    cylindrical coordinate system cannot generate, as its own
divisions of the organic form, ฯ• โ‰ˆ 1. 618 is the proportion              movements, a laterally deviation of one cylinder relative
of the golden ratio. The reproducibility of the value of the             to another. For such a deviation, it is necessary that the z
golden wurf for many biological divisions, as well as the                axis of the lateral cylinder deviates by a nonzero zenith
importance of conformal and projective mappings in the                   angle relative to the z axis of the original cylinder, but
transformations of the organic form, is noted in [10].                   there is no zenith angle in the cylindrical coordinate
Numerous examples of biological symmetry, attempts of                    system, it is only in the spherical one. Therefore,
their generalizations are shown by N.A.Zarenkov,                         considering the plant form as an objectified own
particularly in [11]. He develops the ideas of                           coordinate system, we must supplement the cylindrical
"biosymmetry" proposed by Yu.A.Urmantsev in his                          structures of the telome theory with spherical structures.
version of the general theory of systems (GTS). An                       The design of the spherocylinder described above, just
indication of the advantages of the component approach                   allows you to implement such a deviation. Due to the
when transferring a geometric shape from one medium to                   presence of hemispheres at the ends of the cylinder, lateral
another is found, for example, in [12]. Interesting data on              deviations of the z axis are possible here with the
the coordination of parameters of organic and inorganic                  formation of a new spherocylinder. Thus, we can assume
forms within the framework of temporal definitions can be                that wherever plant structure is capable of branching, it can
found in [13-15]. You can also mention the research                      do so only within a spherical component (hemispheres) of
of A.A. Lyubishev, L.V. Belousov, dedicated to the                       spherocylinders (fig. 2).
specificity of the organic form. But in general, it should be
noted that the field of biological morphology still remains
at a predominantly descriptive level and urgently needs the
first theoretical generalizations.

4. The phenomenon of organic form
       The organic form can be defined as a spatial structure,
which has the following essential properties: 1) infinite-
similarity, i. e., in our case, this structure is a finite volume
V*, which is isomorphic to the infinite space V, i. e. ๐‘‰๐‘‰ โˆ— =
๐‘…๐‘…๐‘‰๐‘‰โˆ’1โˆ— (๐‘‰๐‘‰ โˆ— ), where ๐‘…๐‘…๐‘‰๐‘‰โˆ’1โˆ— is an isomorphism, 2) self-similarity:
in the form V*, there are parts v* that are similar to the
whole V*, i.e. an isomorphic mapping ๐‘‰๐‘‰ โˆ— = ๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ÿ๐‘‰๐‘‰โˆ’1          โˆ— (๐‘‰๐‘‰ ) is
                                                                 โˆ—

defined (note that self-similarity is a property of the                       Fig. 2. Docking of central and lateral spherocylinders
whole V*), 3) holo-similarity, when a part of the whole is
similar to the whole (holo-similarity is a property of part                  The fact that a part of the stem can be cut out of the
v*), 4) the presence of protoform, i.e. such a form v0*, by              plant, planted in the ground, and new shoots will start to
transformations of which all the holo-similar parts v* of                grow from its upper end, and the roots begin to grow
the whole V* (including the whole V * itself) are formed.                below, suggests that inside some spherocylinders there are
       All the described features of the organic form express            potentially others that can be activated under certain
one general principle: the increased interpenetration of                 conditions. This is the property of self-similarity of the
the whole and the part when the third state of the whole-                plant form as organic form.
part arises (or holomerone, from the greek โ€œholosโ€ - the                     Morphologically, the lateral branchings of the plant
whole, and โ€œmerosโ€ - the part), i.e. an invariant of                     stem realize themselves through the formation of leaves
transformations between the whole and the part. This kind                and the growth of the new shoot from the lateral bud,
of invariance can also be called holomereological                        which is located in the sinus between the leaf stalk and the
symmetry.                                                                stem. The leaf itself expresses the finale of plant growth,
       In addition, the organic form as a whole V* also has              while the lateral bud contains the germ of a new shoot with
infinite-similarity, i.e. it is an infinite space compressed             its growth potential. But in order to form a new shoot in a
into a finite volume, representing additional kind of                    new direction of growth, you need a leaf and a lateral bud
invariance, the invariance between infinite and                          that appears near it. Like a leaf is a direction with a fixed
value, the lateral bud and its future shoot are a value with          the Fibonacci series and are characteristic of each type of
a fixed direction.                                                    plant. For example, the leaf disposition in cereals, birch,
    It seems that it is very convenient to simulate by                grapes is expressed by the formula ยฝ, in a tulip, alder - 1/3,
changing of the vector X, where |X| is the value of X, and            in pears, currants, plums - 2/5, in cabbage, radishes, flax -
x is the unit vector of X, i.e. x = X/|X|. Then we get:               3/8, etc.
               ๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘ ๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘|๐‘‹๐‘‹|        ๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘ ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ|๐‘‹๐‘‹|                         In this case, we see the involvement of the azimuthal
                    =        = |๐‘‹๐‘‹|      +          .                 angle in the organization of spherocylinders. On the stem
               ๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘    ๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘         ๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘    ๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘
    Here, the complete change of the vector in time is the            of the plant upwards, there is a spiral organization,
sum of two changes: 1) change in direction with the fixed             expressed in lateral leaves (shoots). It should be noted that
                                               ๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘
value, which is expressed by the term |๐‘‹๐‘‹| , 2) change in             a cylindrical spiral is a fairly organic structure in the
                                               ๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘
                                    ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ|๐‘‹๐‘‹|                          cylindrical coordinate system. It is expressed by the form
the value with the fixed direction         .                          (ฯ0, ฯ•, z(ฯ•)), where for example z(ฯ•) = kฯ•.
                                      ๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘‘
    So in the dynamics of plant growth, these two                         Let us see how a lateral shoot is formed. In the area of
components are morphologically separated. The moment                  the stem node, there is a cross section of the cylinder,
of direction change with the fixed value is allotted to the           which becomes the base of the upper hemisphere, due to
leaf with the formation of a lateral bud, while the growth            which the z axis can deviate, and a lateral spherocylinder
of the lateral shoot from this bud expresses the moment of            appears. This creates an uncompensated spherical polarity
change in the value with the fixed direction.                         (in the plane (ฯ, ฯ•)), which must be compensated, and the
    As you know, the stem has negative geotropism (the                emergence of a sequence of other side leaves (shoots) is
tendency to grow up, against gravity), and the root has               the intention to gradually compensate for the initial
positive one (grow down, by gravity). This means that the             polarity until the branch will come exactly above the initial
stem and root carry their own coordinate systems, where               one (on one orthostich). Similar relationships can be
there is a vertical axis, and they coordinate this axis with          expressed by polar analysis [3].
the direction of gravity. In the cylindrical coordinate                   Summing up, we can assume the plant structure as the
system, there is such an axis, this is the z axis. But we need        organic form having increased unity of the whole and
also the asymmetry of the axis z to express geotropism,               parts, as well as infinite-similarity whole, more
what can be done through the introduction of two                      specifically expressed in the possibility of providing R-
cylindrical coordinate system: (ฯ, ฯ•, zL) for stem                    spherocylinders as a base plant protoform, by various
spherocylinder, and (ฯ, ฯ•, zG) for the root one, where zL =           modifications and compositions of which derivative plant
- zG.                                                                 forms are generated. In this case, the plant appears as a
    But if there are essentially two oppositely polarized             multi-level hierarchical R-space, which includes many
cylinders with coordinates zL and zG in the cylinder of the           spherocylindrical R-subspaces and their compositions.
spherocylinder, then each of them is associated with only             Each of the vertical R-spherocylinders includes two
one hemisphere (upper for itself). As a result, we have two           hemicylinders with opposite geotropy and their own
hemispherocylinders in one spherocylinder. They can be                cylindrical coordinate systems that are oppositely directed
called, for example, as L - and G-hemispherocylinders                 along the z axis.
(levitational and gravitational ones).
    Another       interesting   phenomenon          of   plant        6. Golden wurf in the proportion of plants
morphogenesis is phyllotaxis, i.e. patterns of disposition of             S.V. Petukhov introduced the concept of the golden
leaves on the stem. It turns out that in the general case, the        wurf and showed its implementation for many divisions of
attachment points of leaf stalks to the stem form a spiral,           organic forms [10]. The author investigated the
where m turns of spiral have n leaves, if we go along the             implementation of the golden wurf W(a, b, c) for
stem (as z axis) from a leaf with a certain azimuth                   neighboring divisions a, b, c using the example of the
angle ฯ• in the cylindrical coordinate system (ฯ, ฯ•, z) to the         lengths of internodes of plant stems and obtained a good
first leaf with the same angle. They say about such leaves            agreement between the average values of the wurfs and
that they lie on one vertical line - orthostichia. It is              1.3. Below is one of the tables for the chicory stalk (table
remarkable that pairs of numbers m and n (usually they                1). After the table, there is a graph representing the values
are written as the fraction m/n) in this case are elements of         of the Wurfs from this table (fig. 3).

                 Table 1. The lengths of neighboring internodes xk and the wurfs of their triples for the chicory stem
  k           Length xk of neighboring internodes, cm                            Wurf W(xk,xk+1,xk+2)                    Wurf average
  1                             4.8                                                    1.240
  2                             6.7                                                    1.407
  3                             5.8                                                    1.270
  4                             6.8                                                    1.430
  5                             5.8                                                    1.250
                                                                                                                            1.331
  6                             7.3                                                    1.430
  7                              6                                                     1.290
  8                             7.3                                                    1.270
  9                             7.3                                                    1.390
 10                             5.5                                                    1.340
  k           Length xk of neighboring internodes, cm                            Wurf W(xk,xk+1,xk+2)                    Wurf average
 11                             5.4                                                    1.280
 12                             5.4                                                    1.380
 13                             4.2                                                    1.340
 14                              4                                                     1.270
 15                              4                                                     1.450
 16                             2.9                                                    1.270
 17                             3.4                                                    1.250
 18                             2.9                                                    1.570
 19                             1.7                                                    1.200
 20                             2.3                                                    1.240
 21                             1.5                                                    1.400
 22                             0.7
                                0.5




                                      Fig. 3. Graphical representation of the data from table 1

                                                                                                               ๐‘€๐‘€ โˆ’ ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ โˆ— ๐›ฝ๐›ฝ
7. Cirrus leaf modeling                                                                  ๐พ๐พ(๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ โˆ— ) = ๐‘€๐‘€0 ๏ฟฝ                ๏ฟฝ .
                                                                                                                  ๐‘€๐‘€
    In a number of my works [6, 7, 16], I described leaf                 Knowing the contour K (x*) and the point on the
models with arc-like venation as a result of the action of           central vein x*i , we can compress along the y axis, above
the inverse R-function on the 2D-plane, justifying the               this point, a segment of length from x*i to K(x*i ) by the
infinite-similariy of the leaf as a special case of the organic      inverse R-function R-1K (x*i) , for which it is necessary to
form. Below is a brief description of the simulation in              use again the parametric definition of functions, for
program MathCad of more complicated case of cirrus leaf,             example, from the same x.
which can not be received by the effect of one R-mapping,                Here, it will be necessary to determine the function
and it has to connect this type of transformation of infinite        along the y axis with respect to some argument Xi(x),
structures to finite ones with external transformations of           which will give the value x*i for all x.
the finite structures, generally yielding a mixed strategy of            Accurate hit on the contour, i.e. at the value of K(x*i),
organic forming.                                                     is achieved in this case for the function R-1ะš(S(ั…*i))(ั…) =
    At the beginning, when constructing a mathematical               1/Rะš(ั…i)(ั…), and not for R-1ะš(ั…*i)(ั…), where S = R+1M is the
model of cirrus leaf, it is carried out the compression by           direct R-function.
inverse R-function R-1M of the axis x, yielding the variable             So, in MathCad, we are building the function
x* = R-1M(x). Then, the contour of the sheet K(x*) is                                     2โ‹… K ( S( xi) ) ๏ฃถ                     x
                                                                            Ri( x) := ๏ฃซ๏ฃฌ                            ๏ฃซ                    ๏ฃถ
                                                                                                          ๏ฃท โ‹… atan ๏ฃฌ ฯ€ โ‹… 2โ‹… K ( S( xi) ) ๏ฃท ,
formed, taking, for example, a linear function, raising it to                          ๏ฃญ        ฯ€         ๏ฃธ         ๏ฃญ                    ๏ฃธ
a power ฮฒ of less than 1, which will give the convexity of
                                                                                                   X0( x) := xi,
the contour:
                                                                     where xi is understood as the value on the R-compressed
                                            ฮฒ
                                 M โˆ’ R( x) ๏ฃถ                         axis, which will correspond to S(xi) for the parameter x.
                K ( x) := M0โ‹… ๏ฃซ๏ฃฌ           ๏ฃท .                       Therefore, we write not K(xi), but K(S(xi)).
                               ๏ฃญ M ๏ฃธ
                                                                         Therefore we get the vertical segment over xi up to
    Here M0 is the maximum level of the sheet edge along
                                                                     K(xi). This segment expresses the orthogonal lateral vein
the y axis, R(x) is the inverse R-function R-1M(x).
                                                                     at the point of separation xi from the central vein.
    In MathCad, we obtain the graph K(x*), expressing
                                                                         To express cirrus venation, we tilt this segment from
K(x) along the axis y, and along the axis x we have value
                                                                     point xi to point x(i +1). To do this, we introduce a new
x* = R(x) = R-1M(x). Here x acts as a parameter, on which
                                                                     parameter ai, for which we set the range of variation and a
both the absciss and the ordinate depend. But the function
                                                                     linear function on this range:
K is written for x as its argument. And to get a point of the
                                                                                   ai := S( xi) , S( xi) + 0.1 .. S( xi + 1) ,
contour K(x*), we need to set the value of the argument x
                                                                                                 R( ai) โˆ’ xi ๏ฃน
for the function K. It should be borne in mind that the                          Zi( ai) := ๏ฃฎ๏ฃฏ                   ๏ฃบ โ‹… K ( S( xi + 1) ) .
functions K(x) and K(x*) are different!                                                      ๏ฃฐ ( xi + 1) โˆ’ xi๏ฃป
    Here again, it should be noted that we take                           We also supplement all the constructions for yโ‰ฅ0 on
the parameter ai relative to the R-compressed scale x*,               the region y<0 by putting a minus sign in front of the
defining it in the interval from (๐‘†๐‘†(๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ๐‘–๐‘– ))โˆ— = ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ๐‘–๐‘– to               corresponding functions. As xi, points 0, 2 and 4 were
(๐‘†๐‘†(๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ๐‘–๐‘–+1 ))โˆ— = ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ๐‘–๐‘–+1 , therefore, the parameter ai itself must     selected. The last inclined straight is ended at the point
be determined with respect to the direct R-maps for this              K(5.5) of the edge. As a result, we have the following
segment.                                                              picture for M = 6 and M0 = 5 โ€“ fig. 4.




                                                       Fig. 4. Cirrus leaf model

    Summing up, we can conclude that the laws of the
plant form, as an important example of the living form in             Acknowledgment
general, completely correspond to the hypothesis of the                   The reported study was funded by RFBR according to
organic form and infinite-similarity of biological systems,           the research project โ„– 19-07-01024.
striving in the limit to maximize fusion of the whole and
the part in the state of holomereological symmetry,                   References:
combining the properties of infinite-similarity and self-
similarity, reinforced by penetration of a single                     [1] Moiseev V.I. R-physics: a project of inorganic and
spherocylindrical protoform. The plant appears as a kind                  organic physics (โ€œbig physicsโ€) based on the
of "living crystal", possessing an amazing "living                        relativistic theory of quantity. In 2 vols. T.1: Natural
geometry" with its own peculiar laws and principles of a                  science project. - M: LENAND, 2019. - 552 p.
highly holistic being.                                                [2] Moiseev V.I. R-physics: a project of inorganic and
                                                                          organic physics (โ€œbig physicsโ€) based on the
8. Results                                                                relativistic theory of quantity. In 2 vols. T. 2: Reasons.
                                                                          Humanitarian applications. - M.: LENAND, 2019. -
    The article defines the organic form and its application              464 p.
to modeling the morphology of a generalized plant as an               [3] Moiseev V.I. Essays on the Philosophy of Neo-
infinite-similar and self-similar structure on R-                         Allunity: An Experience of Mathematical Reading of
spherocylinders. On this basis, an attempt was made to                    Philosophy. Axiology. Logics. Phenomenology. - M.:
explain a number of plant morphology phenomena: lateral                   LENAND, 2018. - 632 p.
bud, geotropism, phyllotaxis, etc. Empirical data are                 [4] Moiseev V.I. The logic of open synthesis: in 2 vols.
presented, supporting the golden wurf phenomenon for                      T. 1. Structure. Nature. Soul. Book 1. - St. Petersburg:
plant morphology. A model of the cirrus leaf as a system                  Publishing House Mir, 2010. - 744 p.
of R-structures is constructed.
[5] Moiseev V.I. The logic of open synthesis: in 2 vols.
     T. 1. Structure. Nature. Soul. Book 2. - St. Petersburg:
     Publishing House Mir, 2010. - 743 p.
[6] Moiseev V.I. R-geometry: basic ideas // SCVRT2019
     International Scientific Conference โ€œSituational
     Centers and Class 4i Information and Analytical
     Systems for Monitoring and Security Problemsโ€ of
     the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental
     Biophysics of the Russian Academy of Sciences and
     the Research Center for Physical and Technical
     Informatics, November 13, 2019, Pushchino, Moscow
     region. - Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State
     University of Architecture and Civil Engineering,
     2019.- P.36-41.
[7] Moiseev V.I. Organic form as a multi-level
     (hierarchical) R-space // SCVRT2019 Proceedings of
     the International Scientific Conference of the Nizhny
     Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil
     Engineering and the Research Center for Physical and
     Technical Informatics, May 13-17, 2019, TsarGrad,
     Moscow Region, Russia. โ€“ Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny
     Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil
     Engineering, 2019. - P. 182-196.
[8] Ivanov A.L. Evolution and phylogeny of plants: a
     tutorial. - Moscow-Berlin: Direct-Media, 2015. - 292
     p., ISBN: 978-5-4475-3833-0.
[9] D'Arcy W. Thompson. On Growth and Form.
     Cambridge University Press. 2000 [1917].
[10] Petukhov S.V. Biomechanics, bionics and symmetry.
     M: Nauka, 1981.- 240 p.
[11] Zarenkov N.A. Biosymmetry - M.: Librocom, 2020. -
     318 p.
[12] Filinskikh A.D., Merzlyakov I.N. Assessment of
     geometric models based on the structure of their
     parameters // Information measuring and control
     systems. 2015 ะข. 13, โ„– 3 P. 69-74.
[13] V.A. Panchelyuga, M.S. Panchelyuga Fractal
     Dimension and Histogram Method: Algorithm and
     Some Preliminary Results of Noise-Like Time Series
     Analysis // Biophysics, 2013, Vol. 58, No.2, pp.283-
     289.
[14] Balaguer Mark. Stanford Encyclopedia of
     Philosophy. - Stanford University, 2009.
[15] Falconer Kenneth. Fractal Geometry: Mathematical
     Foundations and Applications. - Wiley, 2003. -
     366 p. - ISBN 978-0470848616.
[16] Moiseev V.I. R-analysis and the problem of modeling
     organic forms // SCVRT2018 Proceedings of the
     International Scientific Conference of the Moscow
     Institute of Physics and Technology (State University)
     of the Institute of Physicotechnical Informatics,
     November 20-23, 2018, TsarGrad, Moscow Region,
     Russia. - M.: Institute of Physical and Technical
     Informatics, 2018. - P.339-346.

About the autor
    Moiseyev Vyacheslav I., PhD Hab, professor, head of the
Department of Philosophy, Biomedethics and Humanitarian
Sciences of Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
by A.I.Evdokimov. E-mail: vimo@list.ru.