<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Axiomatic basis and methods for interpreting conflict situations in an urgent computing environment</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Keldysh Institute of applied mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Plekhanov Russian University of Economics</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Saint Petersburg state Maritime technical University</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Yu.I.Nechaev</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The article deals with the issues of developing an axiomatic basis and interpreting conflict situations in conditions of high uncertainty based on the dynamic theory of catastrophes. Control over conflict situations is provided using applied modeling at the expense of the supercomputer center through system integration of technologies and tools for processing large amounts of current information. Functional components of the center for applied simulation implement dynamic visualization and development of management decisions. The key factor in ensuring the safety of critical facilities in a complex conflict situation is the speed of assessment of the situation and the development of adequate management decisions for the implementation of the response. Adequate management is based on experience, as a rule, obtained experimentally in the course of physical modeling of impacts (exercises, trainings, experiments, etc.), and accumulated in the form of a knowledge base of the information and analytical decision support system of the center for applied simulation.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>The purpose of experimental studies conducted in the</title>
        <p>development of functional elements of the center for
applied simulation (CAS) is to study the features of
conflict interaction in the system of complex security of
critical objects based on Urgent computing System (UCS).
At the same time, a typical situation is when due to high
uncertainty, the characteristics of the control object (CO)
of interest are not available for direct observation and
measurement, and obtaining data from a physical
experiment can be quite difficult and expensive. In this
case, by analyzing and generalizing materials describing
conflicts of various origins, some indirect information
about the object of conflict interaction under study is
obtained. Such information is determined by the nature of
the phenomenon being studied, the peculiarities of the
process of origin, formation and development of various
forms of antagonistic conflicts. The identification and
formalization of conflict behavior entities of interacting
parties makes it possible to develop a software and tool set
for high-performance computing based on a CAS.</p>
        <p>
          Diagnostics of the object of interaction is provided by
system integration of methods of planning and conducting
computational experiments in order to further solve
problems related to the formation of scientific ideas and
the development of effective management decisions in
conflict situations. The theoretical basis for the study of
conflict situations and certain methodological principles
for the study of complex systems in high-performance
environments urgent computing are formulated in [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref10 ref11 ref12 ref13 ref14 ref15 ref16 ref17 ref18 ref19 ref2 ref20 ref21 ref22 ref23 ref24 ref25 ref26 ref3 ref4 ref5 ref6 ref7 ref8 ref9">1-26</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-2">
        <title>A characteristic feature of the interpretation problems that</title>
        <p>arise in this case is that in the course of research, it is
necessary to conclude about the properties of the CO in a
conflict situation based on their indirect manifestations,
established as a result of a series of computational
experiments.</p>
        <p>
          Thus, the CAS formulates and solves complex
interdisciplinary problems associated with the creation of
an integrated computer modeling system based on a
multiprocessor computer complex, combining information
and computational resources of expert and research
activities to form scientific representations for solving
applied problems in the field of conflictology. The
development of effective management decisions is
implemented on the basis of the formalization of
antagonistic conflicts within the framework of
problemoriented methods that allow us to determine the causes of
conflict situations as a result of experimental studies and
practical observations. Problems of this type are
commonly called inverse problems [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ]. Causal inverse
problems of the emergence and development of conflict
situations are individual and are used in the construction
of mathematical models of interaction based on the
dynamic theory of catastrophes [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ].
2.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Space behavior and management in the interpretation of conflict situations in CAS models</title>
      <p>
        The procedure for solving problems involving the
reversal of causal relationships is often associated with
overcoming complex mathematical difficulties. The
success of the solution is determined not only by the
quality and quantity of information obtained from the
experiment, but also by the way it is processed. That is
why the developed conceptual solutions based on the
dynamic theory of catastrophes provide for the use of
procedures for geometric and analytical interpretation of
the CO behavior using specially developed mathematical
models, including modified Mathieu and Duffing
differential equations [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. At the same time, the solution of
the inverse problem in complex conflict situations is
preceded by a study of the properties of the direct problem
based on a conceptual analysis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4 ref5 ref6 ref7 ref8">4-8</xref>
        ]. It is assumed that the
source data has large dimensions (a set factors and states
of CO), does not always follow the normal distribution,
and is incomplete, inaccurate, and noisy. Usually the data
is extremely difficult to establish as a result of specially
organized physical modeling and the only way to obtain
them is a computational experiment. The given
characteristic of the initial data allows us to formulate the
following basic requirements for the mathematical model
of interaction when performing urgent calculations in a
CAS:
• meaningful interpretability using the concept of Soft
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Computing and Data Mining based on the geometric</title>
        <p>and analytical components of the dynamic disaster
model;
• efficient computability based on parallel information
processing algorithms in a multiprocessor
supercomputer computing environment.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>These two requirements determine the construction of</title>
        <p>an interaction model when developing algorithms for
conflict control and testing knowledge models that define</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>UCS procedures under various interaction conditions.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>For fig.1 presents a conceptual framework of</title>
        <p>supercomputer technologies that implements information
transformation procedures for interpreting the behavior of
objects in conflict situations based on the dynamic theory
of catastrophes.</p>
        <p>Reference model of
conflict situations</p>
        <p>AXIOMATIC BASIS OF
SUPER</p>
        <p>COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES
Standard
situations
Non-standard
situations</p>
        <p>Conceptual model of
information transformation
Variety of adaptive control
strategies</p>
        <p>Controlling and
Interpreting Models</p>
        <p>Analysis of the
current situation
Prediction of the
current situation
A LOT OF ELEMENTS IMPLEMENTING A MODEL OF CONFLICT SITUATIONS</p>
        <p>BASED ON THE DYNAMIC THEORY OF CATASTROPHES
Variety of Elements of the
operational database and
knowledge</p>
        <p>The set of values of the
input actions vector</p>
        <p>
          Variety of processing
information algorithms
The model of conflict situation interpretation in this
figure is presented in the form of an interaction area, in
which information transformations are performed and its
geometric representations are constructed, which allow us
to understand the processes of learning and development
and identify the "subtle effects" of the studied
phenomenon. The cognitive process provides
"compression" of the code of the processed signal and
maximum possible abstraction of the description
contained in the signal to achieve a higher degree of
predictability [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>The concept of dynamic catastrophe theory defines the
study of CO behavior within the framework of
spatiotemporal interpretation. The formal model for converting
information based on UCS procedures looks like:
{R1n (t ) × R1r (t ) → R1 (t ) ,..., Rmn (t ) × Rmr (t ) → Rm (t )} , (1)
where {R1n(t),...,Rmn(t)} and {R1r(t),...,Rmr(t)} - spaces of
behavior and control that determine the result of the
transformation of information about the conflict on the
basis of which the reconstruction of the original formal
models of interaction; j = 1,...,m - the sequence of events
that define the evolution of the system.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>The model is used as an operator for nonlinear transformation of information about the evolution of the CO:</title>
        <p>f j (•) : Rnj (t ) × Rrj (t ) → Rj (t ) ,
(2)
where Rjn(t), Rjr(t), Rj(t) are spaces of internal and external
variables controlled by the function f(•), which can be
considered as a smooth function taking into account the
accepted assumptions.</p>
        <p>
          To display the results of the functioning of the CPM
using the function fj(•), quasi-stationarity sections are
considered in the process of evolution of the interaction
system. The physical interpretation of the features of CO
behavior in these areas is carried out within the framework
of synergetic control theory [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ]. When discussing this
problem in the framework of dynamic catastrophe theory,
the unified fundamental apparatus for the study of
nonlinear systems is preserved. In complex situations,
especially in non-stationary interaction, in addition to the
usual behavior and control spaces, the corresponding
functions that characterize the variety of conflict situations
under study are considered.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-6">
        <title>Thus, the CAS in the interpretation of conflict</title>
        <p>situations is considered as a developing active dynamic
system functioning in a complex dynamic environment.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-7">
        <title>Management of CAS is to establish the procedures,</title>
        <p>minimizing an objective function that ensure the maximum
effectiveness of management in the current situation.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-8">
        <title>Active elements are defined as CAS objects whose</title>
        <p>
          functions are aimed at modeling and visualizing the
dynamics of interaction between elements of a conflict
environment within the framework of the UCS concept.
When generating alternatives and developing control
actions, a collective strategy is selected, taking into
account the strategy of the active elements of the
multiagent system (MAS). The hypothesis of independent
behavior of active elements (intelligent agents-IA) is
considered within the framework of the paradigm of
information processing in a multiprocessor computing
environment [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ]. The synthesis of an optimal control
function for active elements of distributed intelligence
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-9">
        <title>MAS ensures maximum efficiency of information</title>
        <p>processing procedures in UCS mode. Multiple actions to
implement IA in the Multiagent Modeling System (MMS)
is defined by a set of decision support procedures (DPS).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-10">
        <title>Planning actions in assessing the state of the CO and predicting its development in the MMS consists in choosing effective planning procedures based on the criteria of optimality [4].</title>
        <p>We formalize the problem of evaluating the
effectiveness of the developed management decisions in
the CAS models. Let x∈Rn be the vector of parameters
defining the generated solutions, and w∈Rm be the vector
of the state of the conflict interaction environment in
which the controlled CO functions. If [x, w]∈A, then the
technical solution with the parameter vector x ensures the
effective functioning of the CO in an environment
characterized by the vector w. If [x,w]∈B then the
generated solution leads to inefficient operation of the
system. These conditions define the problem of choosing
a solution:</p>
        <p>х * (X ,W ) &gt; 0, ∀(X, W) ∈ A ;
х * (X ,W ) &lt; 0, ∀(X, W) ∈ В , х*∈ Х * ,
(3)
where x* is the selected class of dividing functions.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-11">
        <title>When conditions (3) are implemented, the CAS</title>
        <p>models establish a range of possible values for controlled</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-12">
        <title>CO parameters, which is limited by various factors,</title>
        <p>
          including the specifics of functioning and the level of
development of intelligent technologies. Each specific
implementation of a technical solution corresponds to
certain values of parameters that meet the conditions [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ]:
 1min ≤   ≤   max,  = 1, … ,  .
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-13">
        <title>Thus, in the n-dimensional parameter space for each implementation, a parameter vector can be represented</title>
        <p>= ((Ch)1, … , (Ch) )
m-dimensional space of interaction.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-14">
        <title>In this case, technically, the CO can be considered as a</title>
        <p>certain system that has ninputs for parameters xi and
moutputs for interaction characteristics (Ch)j. For each
vector X of the parameter space (5), such a system matches
the vector of the technical characteristics space defined by
the relation (6).</p>
        <p>
          The considered CO model allows us to construct a
geometric interpretation of various variants of problems,
their analysis and optimal design of operations in the CAS
complexity θ(S) of the system: hierarchy, connectivity and
dynamic behavior, expressed in the following axioms [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>Axiom
1..Hierarchy
defines
the
occurrence of
subsystem S0 in the system S as an inequality
in other words, a subsystem cannot be more complex than
 ( 0) ≤  ( ),
the system as a whole.
connection</p>
        <p>Connectivity
characterizes
parallel
S = S1 ⊕ ... ⊕ Sk subsystems Si
 ( ) = max (  ),  = 1, … ,  .
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(10)
(9)
(11)
or serial connection S = S1 ⊗ ... ⊗ Sk subsystems Si
 ( ) ≤  ( 1) + ⋯ +  (  ).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-15">
        <title>Axiom 3. If the dynamic behaviorin volves a feedback</title>
        <p>connection (Σ-1) from system S2 to system S1, then
 ( 1 ⊕  2) ≤  ( 1) +  ( 2) + ⋯ +  ( 2( −1) 1).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-16">
        <title>Obviously, axiom 3 is a special case of axiom 2 if there</title>
        <p>are no feedbacks.</p>
        <p>If in the class of systems satisfying axioms 1-3, a
subset
of
systems
ϕ
is
distinguished, then the
normalization condition is satisfied:</p>
        <p>( ) = 0 ∀ ∈  .</p>
        <p>Thus, the complexity of CAS elements is a
multivalued
concept that includes
static
and
components. Static complexity is determined by the
complexity of subsystems, and dynamic complexity is
determined
by
the
generation
of
control
signals.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-17">
        <title>Management software is supported by a level of</title>
        <p>computational
"interpretation
complexity.
action"</p>
        <p>A
forms
group
of</p>
        <p>operators
a
structure
of
transformations on a set of generated
management
decisions in order to develop a</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-18">
        <title>General concept of</title>
        <p>managing a complex system
of conflict interaction.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-19">
        <title>Complexity theory is a prerequisite for understanding learning and development processes, and a hierarchical structure defines management under conditions of time delays, noise and uncertainty.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-20">
        <title>Since</title>
        <p>a</p>
        <p>CAS
system
can be represented
as
sequentially-parallel
or
cascaded
(hierarchically)
connected
subsystems,
including
subsystems
with
feedback, the axioms of connectivity explain the structure
of such decompositions. Thus, the hierarchical system in
question is complex and organized. Complexity is defined
as the minimum number of operations required to restore
the system, and organization is defined as the ability to
"compress" information
generated
by a cascade
of
bifurcations that lead to symmetry breaking, and after the
onset of chaos - by a cascade of iterations that increase the
resolution of the display at a given time interval.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-21">
        <title>Within the framework of the axiomatic approach, the</title>
        <p>recognition of abnormal behavior of the CO during the
operation of the CAS based on the UCS concept is
implemented using the following procedures:</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-22">
        <title>Procedure 1. Classes of abnormal behavior of objects in a conflict situation are identified and the corresponding reference interactions are studied using the use-case knowledge base.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-23">
        <title>Procedure 2. An analysis of the conflict situation under study is performed, based on which fragments of interacting objects are formed that are close to classes of abnormal behavior.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-24">
        <title>Procedure 3. For the selected fragments, an axiomatic</title>
        <p>basis is formulated in the form of a sequence of axioms
corresponding to the reference trajectories.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-25">
        <title>Thus, the problem</title>
        <p>of recognizing abnormal CO
behavior based on UCS s reduced to the problem of fuzzy
search for fragments of reference interactions of abnormal
behavior in the observed system evolution.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-26">
        <title>The mathematical theory of functional space in UCS is</title>
        <p>defined by a system of objects and relations within the
framework of an ontological basis, and the logical
structure of the interpretation of the dynamics of the
interaction system is based on fundamental provisions
(axioms) that determine the evolutionary complexity of the
CO. In this case, the analytical component of the dynamic
catastrophe theory is represented by interpretation models,
while the geometric component is represented by various
visual models in the form of cognitive images and fractal
maps. The problem of space-time is considered taking into
account a measure of complexity, taking into account the
interaction of elements of a conflict situation, as well as
the relationship of the concept of analytical synthesis with
the physical laws of interaction.</p>
        <p>The task of predicting CO behavior in a conflict
situation is a chain of transformations:
 1( ,  ) ⇒  1(Out),...,   ( ,  ) ⇒   (Out),
(12)
where the components X1(T,S),...,Xn(T,S) define the
interpretation functions at each
step
of performing
information transformation operations using the control
function, a and Y1(Out),...,Yn(Out) are the results of
predicting the studied characteristics of the interaction</p>
        <p>
          One of the features of the CAS structure is a
hierarchical organization that defines management in
conditions of time delays, noise and uncertainty. Strategic
planning of operations and conceptual decisions in a
hierarchical organization is presented in the form of a
dynamic hierarchical network [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ] (figure 2), which
reflects the fundamental result of integrating components
of a
a set of sublevel models connected by a tree relation. The
formation of hierarchy levels is carried out using the
standard
        </p>
        <p>basis decomposition. At any level of the
hierarchy, the CAS subsystems and relationships between
them</p>
        <p>are distinguished, while ensuring the level of
complex and not losing the levels of direct analysis.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-27">
        <title>The task of constructing an optimal hierarchical</title>
        <p>structure is to construct a set Ω hierarchical structures
(hierarchies) with a given functional
argmin ∈   ( ),
 :</p>
        <p>→  [0, +∞].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-28">
        <title>The concept of hierarchical structure implies the</title>
        <p>asymmetry of connections and the impossibility of cyclic
subordination, i.e., the oriented graph and its acyclicity.</p>
        <p>
          As a tool for describing Ci CAS tasks and the order of
their distribution on the basis of the functional space of
behavior of the dynamic theory of catastrophes, the matrix
of strategic decisions is used, which is an extension of the
functionality of the presentation [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ]:
(13)
(14)
transformation
with display
 ji
∗

X1 
 
X j 
 
X m 
{A1}
(x11 )
        </p>
        <p>*

(x j1 )*

(xm1 )
*
{Ai }
(x1i )*

(x ji )*

(xmi )
*
{An}
(x1n )*  .</p>
        <p>
(x jn )* 




(xmn )* 
Matrix
(15) is
obtained
on the
basis
of the
transformation of the initial data (functional elements of
the CO) using the Cartesian product {m×n} of sets of
alternatives A and features X, which form a representation
of the dynamics of interaction in the current conflict
situation. The system of alternatives in the resulting matrix
of strategic decisions is reduced to a single scale using the
=  ji −  min /  max −  min</p>
        <p>
          ji →  ∗ ∈ [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">0, 1</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>Matrix (15) is used to construct matrices that display
interpretation functions in behavior spaces (Int-Beh) and
control spaces (Int-Cont) at a given implementation
interval:
 1
where Cond (D) is a vector of terms that defines a set of
conditions for the existence of solutions X = {X1, Xn};</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-29">
        <title>V(D) is a vector of decisions that includes the set of</title>
        <p>solutions Y ={Y1, ...,Ym}; M(C) - matrix of compliance
specifying model relationships between conditions and
decisions.</p>
        <p>This interpretation of data reflects the principle of
complementarity, according to which conditions are
provided in which there is a continuous change in the
behavior of objects in the conflict environment. The
formal model of information transformation opens up the
possibility of finding solutions using hierarchical
structures that are characteristic of the tasks under study.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-30">
        <title>This model does not depend on the content of the problem</title>
        <p>and is a universal tool for analyzing and finding solutions.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-31">
        <title>This opens the possibility of "compressing" information, since only the information that is minimally necessary for managing a conflict situation is extracted from the source data.</title>
        <p>Thus, the CAS is considered as an active system
functioning in a complex dynamic environment of
interacting objects. Management of MTC is to establish
the procedures, minimizing an objective function that
ensure the maximum effectiveness of management in the
current situation. Active elements are defined as CAS
objects whose functions are aimed at modeling and
visualizing the dynamics of a conflict environment within
the framework of the UCS concept . When generating
alternatives and developing control actions, a collective
strategy is selected, taking into account the strategy of the
active elements of the system. The hypothesis of
independent behavior of active elements of the CPU is
considered within the framework of the paradigm of
information processing in a multiprocessor computing
environment. The synthesis of an optimal control function
for active elements of the CPU ensures maximum
efficiency of information processing procedures. The set
of implemented actions is determined by the set of PPR
procedures. Planning actions when assessing the state of
the CO and predicting its development consists in
choosing effective planning procedures based on optimal
criteria</p>
        <p>The task of modeling CO dynamics is to construct
scenarios (situation models) with a dynamically changing
class of strategies and manage the scenario. To solve the
problem, a scenario SC is formed, the execution procedures
of which consist in representing SC as a combination of
strategies (alternatives) Sctj and control moments tj,
(j=1,...,N)</p>
        <p>.
  =</p>
        <p />
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-32">
        <title>Transitions between PS strategies are described by</title>
        <p>mapping the set of effective strategies as two sets, the first
of which corresponds to the set of arcs, and the second to
the set of benefits of these strategies in the set of arcs.</p>
        <p>The crucial rule for choosing alternatives in the multi
criteria optimization problem is represented by the
intersection of fuzzy goals Gi and constraints Cj or a
convex combination taking into account their relative
importance:
(20)
 =  1 ∩ … ∩   ∩  1 ∩ … ∩   … ;  =
∑     + ∑     , ∑   + ∑   = 1,
where α is the importance coefficient.
(21)</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>4. Strategies for interpreting CO behavior based on the UCS concept</title>
      <p>In accordance with the concept of dynamic catastrophe
theory on the basis of a supercomputer complex CAS a
strategy for interpreting the evolution of the CO is
implemented as the ability to transform a set of input
signals into a set of output signals in the form of a formal
model:</p>
      <p>(Attr) = ⟨ (Stab),  (Cap)⟩, (22)
where G(Attr) - attractor sets, displaying a model of
interaction in a hostile environment Oh; G(Stab) - many,
forming a movement CO to the target attractor; G(Cap)
set, characterizing the behavior of the CO in the loss of
stability of the environment.</p>
      <p>The CAS computing complex implements the
inputoutput operator behavior functions and provides solutions
to identification, approximation, and prediction problems
that determine the behavior of the CO in the process of
evolution. The interaction space within the framework of
dynamic catastrophe theory defines the interpretation and
control functions, which are used to carry out operational
control of the characteristics of an aggressive environment
in the course of evolution (Fig. 3).</p>
      <p>Iterative process of information transform in the implementation of the dynamic
theory of catastrophes</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>A priori information</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Simulated situation</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Simulation results</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Measurement results</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Interpretation function</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>Allocation of data structures</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>Generalizing Model</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>Classes</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-12">
      <title>System state evaluation</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-13">
      <title>Control function</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-14">
      <title>Allocation situation signs</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-15">
      <title>Select management structure</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-16">
      <title>Formation of management function</title>
      <p>where Фj{f(•)| µ}, (j=1,..., 5) - functions that define classes
of interpretation models: Ф1{f(•)|µ} and Ф2{f(•)|µ}
computational and diagnostic models; Ф3{f(•)|µ} - models
defining the strategy of dynamic catastrophe theory;
Ф4{f(•)|µ} - models for analyzing and predicting the
current situation; Ф5{f(•)|µ} - models of a dynamic
knowledge base.</p>
      <p>The construction of the control function at each step of
the iterative procedure is based on the synergetic paradigm
π(S) in the form of a sequence of actions:
π (S ) = f j (•) ∆t1 ,, f n (•) ∆tn ,
(24)
where fj(•) is the control law defining the expansion and
contraction phases depending on the state interpretation
function at the j-th stage of the system evolution (j=1,...,n);
∆tj is the duration of the stages.</p>
      <sec id="sec-16-1">
        <title>The implementation of interpretation and control</title>
        <p>functions is carried out when modeling the behavior of an</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-16-2">
        <title>CO based on the UCS concept (Fig.4). The CO behavior</title>
        <p>
          model is constructed using MAC and neuro-dynamic
systems (ND-systems) oriented to parallel processing of
information in a supercomputer environment of the CAS
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4">3, 4</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>MODELING OF BEHAVIOR IN CONFLICT SITUATIONS</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-17">
      <title>Link functions and system operations</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-18">
      <title>Functions of the training system and their implementation</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-19">
      <title>Implementation of multi-agent and neurodynamic systems in order to represent the mechanisms of behavior of objects in the interaction environment</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-20">
      <title>Controlling the behavior of system objects based on a learning strategy and generating optimal implementation algorithms</title>
      <p>The theory of strategic decisions in managing CO
behavior provides for a transition from situational
management to management with modeling. Relationships
in graph-based interpretation of network models allow us
to take into account the consequences of decisions being
made and control the behavior of the CO not at the level
of actions, but at the level of chains of events. To perform
simulation procedures in the created virtual space, abstract
symbols of various classes of elements of the structure of
an aggressive environment are formed and the ability to
interpret its behavior within the framework of the theory
of synergetic control is formed.</p>
      <p>
        The facts and phenomena of CO modeling are related
to various interpretations of activity in solving behavior
training tasks using simulations of the physiological and
mental functions of objects in a conflict situation. The
functions of sensory systems are implemented in the
construction of algorithms for information processing
based on the concentration of "consciousness" on the most
important aspects of the development of the interaction
process, which reflects the evolution of the conflict
environment within the framework of a dynamic model of
catastrophes (Fig.5) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНАЯ МОДЕЛЬ ЭВОЛЮЦИИ КОНФЛИКТНОЙ СРЕДЫ
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-20-1">
        <title>Interpreting activity</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-20-2">
        <title>Information processes</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-20-3">
        <title>Sensor systems</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-20-4">
        <title>Building and using functional analysis models</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-20-5">
        <title>Representation of the environment evolution based on the dynamic model of catastrophes</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-20-6">
        <title>Functions of sensory systems in algorithms of concentration of "consciousness"</title>
        <p>The concept of a training model as a mechanism for
coordinating the activity of interaction processes of
conflict objects and the overall balance of information
processing procedures of a supercomputer CAS ensures
the fulfillment of the main modeling. It's task is to create a
computing environment for virtual modeling of
information-physical processes that run in parallel and
ensure the organization of information exchange between
processes (synchronization), and also decision support in
a complex dynamic environment. The controlling
influence that changes the state of the CO in accordance
with a given law is described using the relations:
 0( ( )0),...,   ( ( ) ). (25)</p>
        <p>Here y(Λ(π)) −(π) is a vector of parameters (π0,...πk)
that define the characteristics of the environment and
perturbing influences for a given CO evolution in
accordance with the operating modes of the CPU within
the permissible "input - output" region.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-21">
      <title>5. Assessing the adequacy of conflict situation interpretation models based on the UCS concept</title>
      <sec id="sec-21-1">
        <title>Let's consider the features of the functioning of the</title>
        <p>CAS software complex based on the dynamic theory of
catastrophes. The conceptual model of assessing the
adequacy of mathematical models describing the system
of interaction of objects in conflict situations formalizes
the processes of constructing problems and criteria
functions for interpreting the evolution of the CO in the
implementation interval. For rice.6 presents a sequence of
information processing operations that determines the
criteria basis for evaluating the adequacy of mathematical
description of interaction processes in conflict situations.</p>
        <p>CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR ASSESSING THE ADEQUACY OF FUNCTIONING OF
THE INTERACTION SYSTEM OF CONFLICT ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTS</p>
        <sec id="sec-21-1-1">
          <title>Identification</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-1-2">
          <title>Approximation</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-1-3">
          <title>Prediction</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-1-4">
          <title>Recovery of external disturbances of the interaction environment</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-1-5">
          <title>Assessment of the characteristics of the controlled object (interaction parameters)</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-1-6">
          <title>Predicting the behavior of a controlled object (stages of evolution)</title>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-21-2">
        <title>Here the main stages of implementation of</title>
        <p>computational technology for determining the parameters
of an aggressive environment, dynamics of interaction of
environmental objects, as well as the stages of evolution in
predicting the behavior of elements of the modeled system
are highlighted.</p>
        <p>
          The strategy for assessing the adequacy of UCS
procedures in the functioning of the computing complex
(figure 7) defines the formalization of the conflict situation
based on the factors that characterize a priori information,
the concept of the minimum description length (M DL),
and the problem of complexity. Here the sequence of
stages of forming an adequate UCS model within the
framework of the MDL concept [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ] and complexity
theory [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ] is indicated.
        </p>
        <sec id="sec-21-2-1">
          <title>A priori information</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-2-2">
          <title>Dynamic measurement data</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-2-3">
          <title>Physical simulation results</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-2-4">
          <title>Results of mathematical modeling</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-2-5">
          <title>MDL concept</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-2-6">
          <title>Formation of an information array</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-2-7">
          <title>Selection of data structures</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-2-8">
          <title>Estimation of the description error</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-2-9">
          <title>Complexity problems</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-2-10">
          <title>Forming a set of models</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-2-11">
          <title>Selection of models based on criteria</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-2-12">
          <title>Assessment of the adequacy of the model</title>
          <p>
            is solved by integrating a priori information, the concept
of MDL and the problem of complexity, which determines
the choice of a solution in accordance with the conceptual
model of dynamic catastrophe theory [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
            ], which is
adapted in relation to the problem under consideration.
          </p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-21-3">
        <title>The assessment of UCS adequacy is based on a</title>
        <p>
          modified scheme of O. Balchi [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ] for a specific application
of the conflict situation in order to take into account the
data of physical, neuro-fuzzy and neuro-evolutionary
modeling (Fig.8).
        </p>
        <sec id="sec-21-3-1">
          <title>Cycle Р – ND-model</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-3-2">
          <title>Cycle Р – standard model</title>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-21-4">
        <title>At the same time, the improvements consisted in situations in the functioning of the software complex of the considering UCS as an integral part of a practical application based on it - the task of modeling conflict</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-21-5">
        <title>CAS based on the principle of competition.</title>
        <p>Neural fuzzy
modeling</p>
        <p>Neuro
Evolutionary
modeling
4
Generation and
analysis of
alternatives</p>
        <p>Computational
experiment
Generation and
analysis of
alternatives
4
Assessment of
adequacy</p>
        <p>Construction of
NF, NE models
Using a physical
experiment
Selection and
analysis of the
preferred model
3
3
3
Computational
experiment
4</p>
        <p>Hypotheses and
simplifying
assumptions using
2
Assessment of
adequacy</p>
        <p>Version M
2</p>
        <p>Parametric
synthesis
Structural
synthesis
Version S
Version P
Analysis of</p>
        <p>results
Physics
experiment
1
1
1
5
5
5
Model research</p>
        <p>Assessment of
adequacy</p>
        <p>Model
construct
4
Model
analysis
5
5
5
Space of
alternatives
Choosing a
solution
4
Assessment of
adequacy
Using a physical
experiment
Selection and
analysis of the
preferred model
3
3
3
Using hypotheses
and simplifying
assumptions
1
1
1</p>
        <p>Version M
2</p>
        <p>Correlation
analysis
Analysis of
variance
2
2</p>
        <p>Version S</p>
        <p>Model selection
Formation of an
ensemble of
models
Version P
Simplifying
assumptions
Hypothesis
formulation</p>
        <sec id="sec-21-5-1">
          <title>Cycle М – ND-model</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-5-2">
          <title>Cycle М – standard model</title>
          <p>2</p>
          <p>Selection of NF,
NE models
Improving the
model
4
Bank analysis of
ND-models
Assessment of
adequacy</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-5-3">
          <title>Cycle S – ND-model</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-21-5-4">
          <title>Cycle S – standard model</title>
          <p>The first cycle is associated with the development of
competing models (modeling- M), implemented on the
basis of the ND-system and methods of classical
mathematics. In the course of this cycle, the structural and
parametric synthesis of the neural network is implemented
in the tasks of neuro-fuzzy NF and neuro-evolutionary
modeling, and for the competing model, the assessment of
the overall structure and components within the
framework of sequential statistical analysis procedures.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-21-6">
        <title>The second cycle refers to the implementation of</title>
        <p>
          appropriate mathematical (simulation) experiments
performed with competing models (simulation- S) for
given initial conditions and input vector elements. Here
NF and NE models of data Bank analysis are formed, on
the basis of which a computational experiment is
implemented, generation and analysis of alternatives and
assessment of adequacy. Construction and analysis of the
competing model is carried out in accordance with the
formalization of the problem in conditions of significant
uncertainty in accordance with the algorithm [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-21-7">
        <title>The third cycle is the most important. It consists of</title>
        <p>conducting physical (physical- P) experiments, on the
basis of which models are formed that provide an
assessment of adequacy under conditions of complete
uncertainty. During ND this cycle, the components of the</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-21-8">
        <title>NF and NE models are formed in the ND- и NE system using physical modeling data, a computational experiment is implemented, and the adequacy assessment is performed.</title>
        <p>
          Intelligent support for M,S,P procedures is provided by
the calculation management system and visualization of
modeling results. As estimates of the adequacy of fuzzy,
neural network and competing models, we should adhere
to the recommendations that determine the use of UCM
procedures in complex dynamic environments [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-22">
      <title>6. Conclusion</title>
      <p>Thus, the development of the CAS software package
and demonstration of its functionality in various
conditions of interaction of objects in a conflict
environment is carried out on the basis of supercomputer
technologies for modeling and visualizing interaction
situations using multi-mode ADS. In order to achieve this
goal, the following main tasks are envisaged:
˗
formation of a scientific and technological Foundation
for the dynamics of the CAS functioning in UCS
mode on the basis of supercomputer technologies for
modeling and visualizing interaction processes using
the results of fundamental and applied research;
˗
˗
solving qualitatively new problems in terms of
volume and complexity of conflict situations
interpretation in order to increase the effectiveness of
management decisions to ensure the safety of critical
facilities;
ensuring the integration and effectiveness of research
and development, creation and practical application of
a modern set of applied tools for analyzing and
predicting the development of targeted organized
antagonistic conflicts in conditions of uncertainty
based on CAS and high-performance information
processing tools.</p>
      <p>The solution to these problems will achieve the goal of
creating MTC - improving the efficiency of FFD-based
simulation and visualization of the dynamics of interaction
between the elements of the conflict environment on the
basis of supercomputer technologies. The conceptual
solutions that define the problem of connectivity,
complexity and stability based on the UCS concept are
aimed at ensuring the principle of adaptability and reflect
a single trend - an adequate description of the hierarchical
organization and the identification of significant
functionally significant elements of interaction in a
conflict situation. The above analysis is crucial in the
search for mechanisms that ensure the formation of
collective properties of interpretation of an aggressive
dynamic environment, leading to the formation of
hierarchical systems and the emergence of the possibility
of their mutual modeling. Compression of the
mathematical description of conflict situations is a
necessary prerequisite for the formation of collective
properties of interaction models in UCS through the
organization of cross-correlations between the
corresponding variables.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-23">
      <title>References:</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barseghyan</surname>
            <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kupriyanov M. S. Stepanenko</surname>
            <given-names>V. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kholod</surname>
            <given-names>I. I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Methods and models of data analysis: OLAPand Data Data Mining</article-title>
          .
          <source>Saint-Petersburg: BHVPetersburg</source>
          ,
          <year>2004</year>
          . 336 p.
          <article-title>(in Russian)</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tikhonov</surname>
            <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Arsenin</surname>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ya</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Methods of solving ill-posed problems</article-title>
          , Moscow: Nauka,
          <year>1979</year>
          , 284 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Nechaev</given-names>
            <surname>Yu</surname>
          </string-name>
          . I.
          <article-title>Theory of catastrophes: a modern approach to decision-making</article-title>
          .
          <source>- Saint Petersburg: ArtExpress</source>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          , 391 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Nechaev</given-names>
            <surname>Yu</surname>
          </string-name>
          . I.
          <article-title>Topology of nonlinear non-stationary systems: theory and applications</article-title>
          . Saint Petersburg:
          <string-name>
            <surname>Art-Express</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          , 325 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baluta</surname>
            <given-names>V. I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Osipov</surname>
            <given-names>V. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chetverushkin</surname>
            <given-names>B. N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yakovenko</surname>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yu</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Adaptation of intellectual agents in a neoconflict environment / / SCVRT2019 Proceedings of the International scientific conference</article-title>
          .
          <year>2019</year>
          . Pp.
          <volume>28</volume>
          -
          <fpage>35</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kh. Khakimova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.V.</given-names>
            <surname>Zolotarev</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
            <surname>Berberova</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Visualization of bibliometric networks of scientific publications on the study of the human factor in the operation of nuclear power plants based on the bibliographic database Dimensions</article-title>
          .
          <source>Scientific Visualization</source>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          , volume
          <volume>12</volume>
          , number 2, pages
          <fpage>127</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>138</lpage>
          , DOI: 10.26583/sv.12.2.10, E-ISSN:
          <fpage>2079</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3537</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
            <surname>Berberova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.S.</given-names>
            <surname>Zolotarev</surname>
          </string-name>
          , «
          <article-title>NPP risk assessments results dependence study on the composition of the population living around the NPP (on the example of Rostov and Kalinin NPP)»</article-title>
          ,
          <source>GraphiCon 2019 Computer Graphics and Vision</source>
          .
          <source>The 29th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Vision</source>
          . Conference Proceedings (
          <year>2019</year>
          ), Bryansk, Russia,
          <source>September 23-26</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          , Vol-
          <volume>2485</volume>
          , urn:nbn:de:
          <fpage>0074</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2485</lpage>
          -1, ISSN 1613-0073, DOI: 10.30987/graphicon-2019-2-
          <fpage>285</fpage>
          -289, http://ceurws.org/Vol-
          <volume>2485</volume>
          /paper66.pdf, p.
          <fpage>285</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>289</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
            <surname>Berberova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>K.I.Chernyavskii</surname>
          </string-name>
          , «
          <article-title>Comparative assessment of the NPP risk (on the example of Rostov and Kalinin NPP)</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Development of risk indicators atlas for Russian NPPs»</article-title>
          ,
          <source>GraphiCon 2019 Computer Graphics and Vision</source>
          .
          <source>The 29th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Vision</source>
          . Conference Proceedings (
          <year>2019</year>
          ), Bryansk, Russia,
          <source>September 23-26</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          , Vol-
          <volume>2485</volume>
          , urn:nbn:de:
          <fpage>0074</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2485</lpage>
          -1, ISSN 1613-0073, DOI: 10.30987/graphicon2019-2-
          <fpage>290</fpage>
          -294, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol2485/paper67.pdf, p.
          <fpage>290</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>294</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[9] The synergetic paradigm</article-title>
          .
          <source>Variety of searches and approaches</source>
          . Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ.,
          <year>2000</year>
          . 535 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sevryugin</surname>
            <given-names>N. N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yudin</surname>
            <given-names>A.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kuznetsov</surname>
            <given-names>A.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>About the methodology of choosing technical solutions / / automation and modern technologies</article-title>
          .
          <year>2005</year>
          . no.
          <issue>3</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>27</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>30</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Casti</given-names>
            <surname>Jnr</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Big systems: connectivity, complexity and catastrophes</article-title>
          . Moscow: Mir,
          <year>1982</year>
          , 216 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smolentsev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Application of dynamic semantic network for identification in intelligent measurement systems // Collection of reports of the International conference on soft computing and measurement SCM-2000</article-title>
          . Saint Petersburg:
          <year>2000</year>
          . vol.
          <volume>2</volume>
          , pp.
          <fpage>82</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>83</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tikhomirov</surname>
            <given-names>V. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tikhomirov</surname>
            <given-names>V. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Makushkin</surname>
            <given-names>A.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>the Principle of constructing an informationprobabilistic method for implementing a long-term forecast // Software products and systems</article-title>
          .
          <source>No. 2</source>
          .
          <year>2004</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>10</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>15</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kolmogorov</surname>
            <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Information theory and theory of algorithms</article-title>
          . - M.:
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nauka</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>1987</year>
          , 304 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Solodovnikov</surname>
            <given-names>V. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tumarkin</surname>
            <given-names>V. I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Theory of complexity and design of control systems</article-title>
          . Moscow: Nauka,
          <year>1990</year>
          , 168 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lazarson</surname>
            <given-names>E. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Modern technology of automated solution of multivariate problems // Automation and modern technologies</article-title>
          .
          <year>2009</year>
          . No.
          <issue>11</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>23</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>29</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Golitsin</surname>
            <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Petrov</surname>
            <given-names>V. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Harmony and algebra of the living</article-title>
          . - Moscow: Znanie,
          <year>1990</year>
          , 128 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gubko</surname>
            <given-names>M. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Mathematical models of optimization of hierarchical structures</article-title>
          , Moscow: LENAND,
          <year>2006</year>
          . 264 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mesarovich</surname>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Takahara</given-names>
            <surname>Ya</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Obshchaya Teoriya sistem: Matematicheskie osnovy [General theory of systems: mathematical foundations]</source>
          , Moscow: Mir,
          <year>1978</year>
          , 312 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Moiseev</surname>
            <given-names>N. N. Selected works</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , M. TyRex Co.,
          <year>2003</year>
          , 376 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nikolis</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (Ed.)
          <article-title>Dynamics of hierarchical systems: an evolutionary view</article-title>
          , Moscow: Mir publ.,
          <year>1989</year>
          , 488 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Figueira</surname>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Almada-Lobo</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Hybrid simulationoptimization methods: A taxonomy and</article-title>
          discussion //
          <source>Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. - 2014</source>
          . -
          <fpage>Т</fpage>
          .
          <year>46</year>
          . - С.
          <fpage>118</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>134</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          [23]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Foster</surname>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhao</surname>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Raicu</surname>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lu</surname>
            <given-names>S. Cloud</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Computing</surname>
            and
            <given-names>Grid</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Computing</surname>
          </string-name>
          360-Degree Compared // eprint arXiv:
          <volume>0901</volume>
          .0131,
          <year>2008</year>
          [Electronic resource]: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0901/0901.0131.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          [24]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. Gallopoulos E.N.</given-names>
            <surname>Houstis</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
            <surname>Rice</surname>
          </string-name>
          , «Computer as Thinker/Doer:
          <article-title>Problem-Solving Environments for Computational Science» IEEE Computational Science</article-title>
          &amp;amp; Eng., Vol.
          <volume>1</volume>
          , No. 2,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Summer</surname>
            <given-names>1994</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , pp.
          <fpage>11</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>23</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          [25]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Szalay</surname>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Extreme</surname>
          </string-name>
          data-intensive scientific computing // Computing in Science &amp; Engineering. - 2011. - T.
          <volume>13</volume>
          . - No. 6. -
          <fpage>СPp</fpage>
          .
          <fpage>34</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>41</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          [26]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zadeh</surname>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Fuzzy logic, neural networks and soft computing // Соmmutation on the ASM-1994</article-title>
          . Vol.
          <volume>37</volume>
          . № 3, p.p.
          <fpage>77</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>84</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>About the authors Nechaev Yuri I. - Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor</source>
          , Saint Petersburg state Maritime technical University. E-mail:
          <article-title>nyui33@mail</article-title>
          .ru Osipov Vladimir P.
          <article-title>- Candidate of Technical Sciences, leading researcher Institute of applied mathematics</article-title>
          . M. V.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>