<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Does finger-tracking point to child reading strategies?</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Anna Rodella Università di Pisa</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Claudia Marzi ILC - CNR Pisa</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Vito Pirrelli ILC - CNR Pisa</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The movement of a child's index finger that points to a printed text while (s)he is reading may provide a proxy for the child's eye movements and attention focus. We validated this correlation by showing a quantitative analysis of patterns of “finger-tracking” of Italian early graders engaged in reading a text displayed on a tablet. A web application interfaced with the tablet monitors the reading behaviour by modelling the way the child points to the text while reading. The analysis found significant developmental trends in reading strategies, marking an interesting contrast between typically developing and atypically developing readers.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1 Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Recent experimental evidence in visual perception
analysis
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">(Lio et al., 2019)</xref>
        shows that eye
movements and finger movements strongly correlate
during scene exploration, at both individual and
group levels. In Lio et al.’s (2019) experiment,
subjects are invited to explore a blurred image
displayed on a touchscreen by moving their fingers
on the display. Picture areas that are located
immediately above the touch point of the subject’s
finger on the screen are automatically shown in
high resolution, thereby simulating the subject’s
central (foveal) vision. The experiment proves that
the subjects’ image-exploring patterns in the two
modalities (optical and tactile) are highly
congruent. The result is not surprising. A familiar context
which exploits this synergistic behaviour is when
      </p>
      <p>
        Copyright c 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use
permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0
International (CC BY 4.0).
children are learning to read. Despite the
undoubtedly different dynamics of the two types of text
exploration, finger-pointing to text helps children
learn to look at print, and supports critical early
reading behaviours: directional movement,
attention focus, and voice-print match
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref19">(Mesmer and
Lake, 2010; Uhry, 2002)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        ReadLet
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref10 ref11 ref11">(Ferro et al., 2018a; Ferro et al.,
2018b)</xref>
        is a web application with a tablet front-end,
designed to support online monitoring of silent
and oral reading abilities through finger-tracking.
Finger-tracking consists of recording the time
series of touch events on the tablet screen where
a child is reading a short story, while the child
is pointing to the text with the index finger of
her dominant hand.2 Preliminary analyses of our
finger-tracking data
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">(Pirrelli et al., 2020)</xref>
        highlighted a diminishing influence of word frequency
and word length on reading time as readers get
older and more proficient (from 3rd to 6th grades).
With increasing exposure to written words,
differences in tracking time between high and low
frequency words gradually tend to decrease,
suggesting a ceiling effect in the entrenchment of both
high- and low-frequency lexical representations in
long-term memory
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">(Zoccolotti et al., 2009)</xref>
        .
Similarly, word length was found to significantly
interact across grades. Younger readers show
increasing difficulty with longer words, with a steeper
time increment for word length &gt; 6, while older
readers are slowed down when words are longer
than 8 letters. This integrates previous evidence
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">(De Luca et al., 2008)</xref>
        , confirming that not even
the most experienced readers can avoid the
slowing down effect of word length.
      </p>
      <p>
        The two-fold interaction of word frequency and
word length with grade levels strongly suggests
that Italian children use a lexical route to
decod2https://www.readlet.it/: see section
publications for materials related to this paper.
ing even at early stages of their reading
development, despite the transparency of Italian
orthography
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4 ref8">(Bates et al., 2001; Davies et al., 2013)</xref>
        .
It also suggests that young readers can make use
of sublexical information, whenever they are
confronted with words that are not contained in their
orthographic lexicon. This developmental
dynamic would account for the stronger sensitivity of
less skilled readers to both lexical frequency and
word length. As lexical information increases with
age, with rarer and longer words finding their way
into the reader’s orthographic lexicon, the reader
makes an increasingly prominent use of lexical
information and an increasingly sparser use of
sublexical information.
      </p>
      <p>In this paper, we provide a finer-grained
quantitative analysis of the finger-tracking profile of
typically developing readers, offering further
evidence that their reading strategy results from an
optimal, interactive combination of both lexical
and sublexical information. The evidence is
compared with the finger-tracking profile of difficult
readers. To provide a more realistic
developmental profile of these effects, we restrict our
focus on nouns only, which are less likely to be
skipped while finger-tracking, and present a
narrower range of variability in both length and
frequency.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>ReadLet</title>
      <p>ReadLet is a tablet-based application that
combines an objective assessment of a child’s
reading fluency and comprehension skills with
careful collection of large-scale behavioural data, and
quantitative modelling of the specific factors
affecting reading development. It leverages an ICT
infrastructure with a cloud-based back-end
exposing a battery of web services acting as an
interface between the central repository and the users.
The ReadLet front-end is an ordinary tablet, where
short stories are displayed for children to read,
either silently or aloud. In both cases, the child
is asked to finger-point to the text while reading.
Texts are displayed on a 10” tablet screen in Lato
font 17pt in black against a white background.
During each reading session, the behaviour of the
child is captured through large streams of
timealigned signals including voice recording,
timestamped finger-tracking patterns, reading time and
question-answering time. Data are automatically
captured and sent to a centralised server for
postprocessing, where audio and finger-tracking time
series are aligned with the text. Recorded and
post-processed data are exposed through a set of
web services offered by the cloud server.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>The Data</title>
      <p>For our present goal, we focus on reading data of
237 children, sampled from entire classes
ranging from 3rd through to 6th school grades, in
Italian and Italian-speaking Swiss schools.3
Participants included both typically developing readers
(N=214) and children screened and reported in
schools as atypically developing readers (N=23),
but who did not receive a clinical diagnosis. Eight
short stories were created for the pilot study, one
for each of the four school grades, and for each
experimental condition (silent and aloud reading).
Children were asked to read a story while
fingertracking the text. After reading in the silent
condition only, children were asked a few
multiplechoice questions, to ascertain they actually carried
out the task.</p>
      <p>
        Texts were automatically annotated for
part-ofspeech, word token frequency, and word
typicality (measured as either the size of the word’s
lexical neighbourhood, or N-size, or the mean
Levenshtein distance from its top 20 neighbouring
words, or Old20
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">(Yarkoni et al., 2008)</xref>
        ).
      </p>
      <p>
        For each child, in both reading conditions, we
calculated the token tracking time as the total time
spent in finger-tracking each word token while
reading. To ensure reliability and precision in the
alignment of finger-tracking data with the text
being read, we selected reading trials with 75% of
finger-tracked text pages. From the original set of
tokens making up the 8 short stories, we selected
97 lemmas for 109 noun tokens, by intersecting
our data with age of acquisition and
imageability assessments by Italian speakers
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16 ref17">(Montefinese
et al., 2014; Montefinese et al., 2019)</xref>
        . In the
resulting data sample, word frequency4 is observed
3Data come from a pilot data collection carried out by
Claudia Cappa and Sara Giulivi in schools of Southern
Tuscany and Canton of Ticino in 2018 and 2019 for the AEREST
project, funded by the Department of Teaching and
Learning of the University of Applied Sciences and Arts of
Southern Switzerland. Data were encrypted and pseudonymized
locally, to then be delivered through a https protocol to a
centralized server, where they are accessed with
authentication credentials and dedicated web services. A background
history of children including information about any clinical
and/or psychological disorders was provided by the schools.
      </p>
      <p>4Token frequency is given as the natural logarithm of
occurrences in the Subtlex corpus
(http://crr.ugent.be/subtlexto vary between min=5.61 and max=11.77, and
word length between 4 and 10 letters (median=5,
mean=5.62, sd=1.40).
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Typical and atypical reading development</title>
      <p>The main goal of the ReadLet project is to propose
and validate an ICT methodology for assessing the
typical reading development of children in Italian
schools. In this section we focus on the
fingertracking behaviour of typically developing
children engaged in reading a short text. The idea is to
provide evidence that finger-tracking patterns
exhibit lexical effects that are well-established in the
reading literature: namely word frequency, word
length and word similarity (or N-size).5</p>
      <p>Figure 1 shows the effects of word frequency
across grade levels, in both aloud (left panel) and
silent (right panel) reading, for typically
developing readers. A linear mixed model fitting token
tracking time as a function of reading type, word
frequency and grade levels shows shorter tracking
times in reading more frequent words. The model
also highlights a significant interaction between
years of schooling and word frequency, with
facilitation effects getting smaller for older graders,
particularly in silent reading. The difference in
facilitation rate between the two reading tasks is not
statistically significant.</p>
      <p>Figure 2 compares the developmental patterns
of token tracking time of typically (left panel) and
atypically (right panel) developing readers,
modelled as a linear function of word token frequency
and grade level. The two patterns exhibit a clear
facilitatory effect of token frequency on reading
speed, confirming that frequency makes reading
consistently easier for both typical and atypical
populations of young readers, who appear to
entertain the same lexical reading strategy.
However, only in typically developing children the
effect tends to diminish across grade levels, with
slopes getting less steep as grade levels increase
(Figure 2, left panel).6</p>
      <p>A similar overall pattern is shown in Figure
3, where the sensitivity to word length of typical
it/) plus one. For our set of noun data the mean frequency is
9.45 (sd=1.61).</p>
      <p>5All figures in the section show regression plots of the
interaction of main effects, using the ggplot function.</p>
      <p>6Regression slopes for 4th and 5th grades are not
statistically different from 3rd grade, but there is a significant
difference when comparing slopes for 3rd and 6th grades.
1t0oken1f2reque6ncy
6
8
8
10
12
readers is contrasted with the same effect in
atypical readers. In both groups, children take more
time to read longer words, but only typically
developing children exhibit a less strong sensitivity
to word length as grade level increases. The
statistical significance of this interaction disappears
in atypical readers, with the only exception of 3rd
graders, compared with all remaining graders.</p>
      <p>Figure 4 shows how grade levels interact with
N-size in affecting aloud (left panel) and silent
(right panel) reading time. The dominant effect
is facilitatory, with a clear incremental advantage
in reading times for words with a high number
of neighbours. Words are finger-tracked more
quickly when they belong to more dense
neighbourhoods, and this facilitatory effect is stronger
for younger (3rd and 4th grade) than older (5th
4
6
8
6
8</p>
      <p>10
10 4
word length
0 5 10 nu15mb2e0r of25n0eigh5bou1r0s 15 20 25
aloud
0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25
number of neighbours
0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25
number of neighbours
and 6th grade) readers. No significant difference
is found in the interaction between reading type
and N-size in typical readers (Figure 5, left panel).
Atypical readers show equal slopes in both aloud
and silent reading, but different intercepts, which
capture the additional processing demands of
concurrent articulation (Figure 5, right panel). This
evidence suggests a sublexical reading strategy
that relies on orthographic similarity: words that
are not read lexically (because they are too long or
less frequent), are read by decoding and
combining the smaller parts they share with other
neighbouring words. Fitting a mixed model with N-size,
frequency ranges, and grade levels, as variables
predicting the token tracking time, and with
subjects as random effect, we find that all predictors
and interactions are highly significant for typically
developing children (Figure 6).</p>
      <p>The behaviour of atypically developing
readers does not replicate the trend of typical readers.
First, the tracking time of atypical readers is more
strongly - and significantly - affected by token
frequency, when compared with the typical tracking
time of their age-matched peers. This is
especially true for the youngest readers in our sample
(3rd graders in the right plot of Figure 2). In
addition, sensitivity to frequency appears to persist
with age, as there are no significant differences
in the facilitatory effect of frequency across later
grade levels. This suggests a delay in developing
and integrating lexical information. A nearly
identical developmental pattern is replicated with
Nsize effects (Figure 6, right panel): younger
children read words in denser neighbourhoods more
easily, taking advantage of the recurrent
sublexical parts shared by neighbouring words. Once
more, no significant developmental pattern is
observed across grade levels, as atypical readers do
not appear to be able to increasingly rely on lexical
reading as they get more experienced (Figure 2).
Finally, their reading time is persistently slowed
down by longer words, suggesting a difficulty in
memorizing and making them accessible through
the lexical route (Figure 3, right panel).
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>General discussion</title>
      <p>
        Facilitatory effects of lexical frequency on reading
reaction time have been reported for Italian
children
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3 ref5">(Barca et al., 2006; Burani et al., 2002)</xref>
        as
well as adults
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref6">(Barca et al., 2002; Burani et al.,
2007)</xref>
        . The effects are argued to reflect the
working of the lexical route in dual-route models of
reading
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">(Coltheart et al., 2001)</xref>
        : word items are
accessed in the reader’s orthographic lexicon, to then
be pronounced after their full phonological code
is retrieved. The faster reading of high-frequency
lexical items thus reflects the well-established
sensitivity of lexical access to word frequency. In
Italian, the systematic nature of letter-to-sound
mapping rules makes the operation of a sublexical
reading strategy a reliable alternative to the
lexical route. However effective, sublexical reading is
nonetheless less efficient, since it requires the
online, serial decoding of a word by its parts (e.g.
n-grams or syllables). We conjecture that Italian
children optimize reading efficiency at early stages
of their reading practice, through dynamic
integration of sublexical and lexical reading. Whenever
possible, they resort to word-sized orthographic
information in their lexicon (e.g. short and
frequent words), and make it up for missing
orthographic items through sublexical information.
      </p>
      <p>
        Such an opportunistic strategy is in keeping
with the idea that early readers strive, through
reading practice, to “chunk” letter n-grams into
longer orthographic units. Chunked units are
stored and made accessible in the readers’ lexicon,
where they are associated with their fully
specified phonological code. The length of stored items
is a function of their frequency, and the reader’s
processing efficiency, reading practice and age.
Our data confirm that this strategy is consistently
adopted by typically developing readers in both
silent and aloud reading, suggesting that the
influence of lexical frequency is not confined to the
retrieval and planning stage of the word
phonological code, but appears to extend beyond response
initiation, to affect full articulation of the code
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">(Balota and Yap, 2006)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>This strategy remains in operation through
reading development, as shown by the decreasing
tracking times of 6th graders as a function of
lexical frequency (Figure 2, left panel).
Nonetheless, the impact of word frequency is less strong in
older readers, whose orthographic lexicon makes
room for increasingly rarer (and longer) words.
Also atypical readers appear to use a similar
“chunking” strategy, but their developmental
pattern fails to show a clear interaction between grade
level and frequency. In Figure 2 (right panel), 3rd
graders show a robust word frequency effect, but
the diminishing role of frequency on tracking time
across grades turns out not to be significant. This
suggests that atypical readers have problems with
developing orthographic representations for rarer
(and longer) words, and they are not quite as
successful as typical readers in optimally integrating
lexical and sublexical information.</p>
      <p>This interpretation is supported by the analysis
of two other lexical effects on child reading
development: word length and neighbourhood size
(Nsize). As expected, longer words elicit longer
response latency and reading duration, but the effect
is bigger for younger, typically developing
readers compared to older ones (Figure 3, left panel),
and for atypical readers compared to their
agematched peers (Figure 3, right panel). The use
of sublexical information and serial n-gram
decoding appears to be more prominent in younger and
atypical readers than in the older and more skilled
group of readers. Once more, the effect can be
argued to reflect the absence of fully specified
orthographic representations for longer words in the
lexicon of less skilled readers, and a related
difficulty in building up complex orthographic chunks.</p>
      <p>
        Facilitatory effects of N-size on reading time
are reported for atypical Italian readers by
Marinelli et al. (2013), who, however, found
no significant facilitation in age-matched typical
readers. They argue that atypical readers
overrely on co-activation of word neighbours during
reading to make it up for their poorly entrenched
lexical representations. Conversely, access to
individual lexical representations by typical readers
is fast enough to make N-size effects hardly
detectable. Our data are consistent with Marinelli et
al.’s evidence, but integrate it in two important
respects. First, the speeding-up influence of N-size
is detected in both aloud and (for the first time to
our knowledge) silent reading of Italian, with no
significant difference between the two (Figure 4
and Figure 5, left panel). This supports an
interpretation of the N-size effect as having an impact
on both phonological planning and overt
articulation. Secondly, our data show that the effect is not
limited to the reading pace of younger and
atypical readers, as observed by Marinelli et al., but it
also holds for typically developing readers (Figure
6), with an interesting modulation by grade level.
This is mainly due to our focus on nouns, which
include longer and less frequent words, for which
N-size effects are known to be stronger and easier
to detect
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(Davies et al., 2013)</xref>
        . Finally, the
diminishing impact of N-size for increasing grade
levels confirms a sparser use of the sublexical route
by more skilled readers, who are equipped with a
richer and more efficient orthographic lexicon.
      </p>
      <p>
        To sum up, typical and atypical readers alike
strive to optimally integrate lexical and
sublexical input patterns while reading, using the former
whenever possible for efficient decoding, and the
latter as a fall-back strategy, whenever the
lexical route fails. This dynamic, however
straightforward, has non-trivial consequences. In a
developmental perspective, the orthographic lexicon
gets richer with practice, boosted by an age-driven
improvement of children’s global ability in
information processing
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">(Zoccolotti et al., 2009)</xref>
        , which
makes longer and rarer words easier to store. As a
result, the dynamic balance is shifted towards
lexical reading. Conversely, atypical readers find it
more difficult to develop and store detailed
mappings between orthographic and phonological
sequences, as confirmed by their greater
sensitivity to frequency and length effects (Figures 2 and
3) and by a prolonged, larger effect of N-size on
finger-tracking (Figure 5, right panel).
6
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Concluding remarks</title>
      <p>We provided evidence that finger-tracking data of
reading children can highlight congruent
developmental patterns in the acquisition of literacy skills.
We only replicated established benchmark effects
reported in the psycholinguistic literature on
decoding transparent orthographies. Nonetheless, to
our knowledge, this is the first time that
fingertracking patterns are shown to significantly
correlate with more established reading data.</p>
      <p>Unsurprisingly, typically developing readers
were shown to read at a faster rate than atypical
readers. Our comparative analysis shows that both
groups of readers are sensitive to the same lexical
effects, but that atypical readers rely on an
impoverished lexicon. We take this evidence to show that
although the two groups adopt the same strategy,
they differ in their global ability in serial
information processing, which has a boosting influence on
lexical development and reading speed.</p>
      <p>
        Despite our promising results, one could
legitimately wonder why we propose using
fingertracking as a proxy of a more established
technology such as eye-tracking. Portability and task
ecology are our strongest arguments. ReadLet
can be used in almost any environment with no
data-acquisition specialist or invasive,
anxietyprovoking equipment. This has practical
consequences for research in education, computer
science, human cognition and medical sciences.
Our architecture supports highly parallel and
distributed processes of data acquisition, which can
be delivered in real time to research, clinical and
education centers as terminals for data
harvesting and quantitative analysis. Large-scale studies
can be conducted, paving the way to more
generalizable results than ever in the past. In
addition, the possibility to take single-subject
measurements on more occasions and in different
environments makes finger-tracking evidence usable not
only in group studies but also for individual
diagnostic purposes. Furthermore, the fine-grained,
multimodal evidence of different signal streams
which are aligned with time and with linguistically
annotated texts provides invaluable training data
for artificial neural networks and classification
algorithms designed to solve engineering problems
or simulate neurophysiological correlates of
cognitive tasks. Last but not least, we know that
reading probes are a commonly used for monitoring
progress in reading fluency and text
comprehension
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">(Miura Wayman et al., 2007)</xref>
        , but take huge
time and effort to collect. The use of a tablet for
extended reading enables deriving this
information unobtrusively and continuously, wherever the
child fancies reading, even at home.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This work is supported by PRIN grant
2017W8HFRX ReadLet: reading to
understand. An ICT driven, large-scale investigation
of early grade children’s reading strategies
(2020-22), from the Italian Ministry of University
and Research.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>David A Balota</given-names>
            <surname>and Melvin J Yap</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2006</year>
          .
          <article-title>Attentional control and the flexible lexical processor: Explorations of the magic moment of word recognition. From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing</article-title>
          ,
          <volume>229</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Laura</given-names>
            <surname>Barca</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Cristina Burani, and Lisa S Arduino.
          <year>2002</year>
          .
          <article-title>Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for italian nouns</article-title>
          .
          <source>Behavior Research Methods</source>
          , Instruments, &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Computers</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <volume>34</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>424</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>434</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Laura</given-names>
            <surname>Barca</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Cristina Burani, Gloria Di Filippo, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Pierluigi</given-names>
            <surname>Zoccolotti</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2006</year>
          .
          <article-title>Italian developmental dyslexic and proficient readers: Where are the differences? Brain and Language</article-title>
          ,
          <volume>98</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>347</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>351</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Elizabeth</given-names>
            <surname>Bates</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Cristina Burani,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Simona D'Amico</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>and Laura</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barca</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2001</year>
          .
          <article-title>Word reading and picture naming in italian</article-title>
          .
          <source>Memory &amp; Cognition</source>
          ,
          <volume>29</volume>
          (
          <issue>7</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>986</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>999</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Cristina</given-names>
            <surname>Burani</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Stefania Marcolini, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Giacomo</given-names>
            <surname>Stella</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2002</year>
          .
          <article-title>How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain and language</article-title>
          ,
          <volume>81</volume>
          (
          <issue>1-3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>568</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>586</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Cristina</given-names>
            <surname>Burani</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Lisa S Arduino, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Laura</given-names>
            <surname>Barca</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2007</year>
          .
          <article-title>Frequency, not age of acquisition, affects italian word naming</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Journal of Cognitive Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>19</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>828</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>866</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Max</given-names>
            <surname>Coltheart</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Kathleen Rastle, Conrad Perry, Robyn Langdon, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Johannes</given-names>
            <surname>Ziegler</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2001</year>
          .
          <article-title>Drc: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud</article-title>
          .
          <source>Psychological review</source>
          ,
          <volume>108</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>204</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Robert</given-names>
            <surname>Davies</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Javier Rodríguez-Ferreiro,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Paz</given-names>
            <surname>Suárez</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Fernando</given-names>
            <surname>Cuetos</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>Lexical and sub-lexical effects on accuracy, reaction time and response duration: impaired and typical word and pseudoword reading in a transparent orthography</article-title>
          . Reading and Writing,
          <volume>26</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>721</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>738</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maria De Luca</surname>
            , Laura Barca, Cristina Burani, and
            <given-names>Pierluigi</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zoccolotti</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2008</year>
          .
          <article-title>The effect of word length and other sublexical, lexical, and semantic variables on developmental reading deficits</article-title>
          .
          <source>Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology</source>
          ,
          <volume>21</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>227</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>235</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Marcello</given-names>
            <surname>Ferro</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Claudia Cappa, Sara Giulivi, Claudia Marzi, Franco Alberto Cardillo, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Vito</given-names>
            <surname>Pirrelli</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2018a</year>
          .
          <article-title>ReadLet: an ICT platform for the assessment of reading efficiency in early graders</article-title>
          .
          <source>page 61</source>
          , Edmonton, Alberta (Canada),
          <fpage>25</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>29</lpage>
          September,
          <year>2018</year>
          . 11th International Conference on the Mental Lexicon.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Marcello</given-names>
            <surname>Ferro</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Claudia Cappa, Sara Giulivi, Claudia Marzi, Ouaphae Nahli, Franco Alberto Cardillo, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Vito</given-names>
            <surname>Pirrelli</surname>
          </string-name>
          . 2018b.
          <article-title>Readlet: Reading for understanding</article-title>
          .
          <source>In 2018 IEEE 5th International Congress on Information Science and Technology (CiSt)</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>6</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Guillaume</given-names>
            <surname>Lio</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Roberta Fadda, Giuseppe Doneddu,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jean-René Duhamel</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>Angela</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sirigu</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <article-title>Digit-tracking as a new tactile interface for visual perception analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Nature Communications</source>
          ,
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <issue>5392</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>13</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Chiara</given-names>
            <surname>Valeria</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marinelli</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Daniela Traficante, Pierluigi Zoccolotti, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Cristina</given-names>
            <surname>Burani</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>Orthographic neighborhood-size effects on the reading aloud of italian children with and without dyslexia</article-title>
          .
          <source>Scientific Studies of Reading</source>
          ,
          <volume>17</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>333</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>349</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Heidi Anne E. Mesmer</surname>
            and
            <given-names>Karen</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lake</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          .
          <article-title>The role of syllable awareness and syllable-controlled text in the development of finger-point reading</article-title>
          . Reading Psychology,
          <volume>31</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>176</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>201</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Miya</given-names>
            <surname>Miura</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wayman</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Teri Wallace, Hilda Ives Wiley,
          <source>Renáta Tichá, and Christine A Espin</source>
          .
          <year>2007</year>
          .
          <article-title>Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading</article-title>
          .
          <source>The Journal of Special Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>41</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>85</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>120</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Maria</given-names>
            <surname>Montefinese</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Ettore Ambrosini, Beth Fairfield, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Nicola</given-names>
            <surname>Mammarella</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>The adaptation of the affective norms for english words (anew) for italian</article-title>
          .
          <source>Behavior research methods</source>
          ,
          <volume>46</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>887</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>903</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Maria</given-names>
            <surname>Montefinese</surname>
          </string-name>
          , David Vinson,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Gabriella</given-names>
            <surname>Vigliocco</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Ettore</given-names>
            <surname>Ambrosini</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <article-title>Italian age of acquisition norms for a large set of words (itaoa)</article-title>
          . Frontiers in psychology,
          <volume>10</volume>
          :
          <fpage>278</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Vito</given-names>
            <surname>Pirrelli</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Claudia Cappa, Davide Crepaldi,
          <source>Viola Del Pinto</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Marcello</given-names>
            <surname>Ferro</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Sara Giulivi, Claudia Marzi, Andrea Nadalini, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Loukia</given-names>
            <surname>Taxitari</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <article-title>Tracking the pace of reading with finger movements</article-title>
          .
          <source>Canada</source>
          ,
          <volume>16</volume>
          -
          <fpage>18</fpage>
          October,
          <year>2020</year>
          . Words in the World International Conference.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Joanna</surname>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Uhry</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2002</year>
          .
          <article-title>Finger-point reading in kindergarten: The role of phonemic awareness, one-to-one correspondence, and rapid serial naming</article-title>
          .
          <source>Scientific Studies of Reading</source>
          ,
          <volume>6</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>319</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>342</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Tal</given-names>
            <surname>Yarkoni</surname>
          </string-name>
          , David Balota,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>and Melvin</given-names>
            <surname>Yap</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2008</year>
          .
          <article-title>Moving beyond coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity</article-title>
          .
          <source>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</source>
          ,
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>971</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>979</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Pierluigi</given-names>
            <surname>Zoccolotti</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Maria De Luca, Gloria Di Filippo, Anna Judica, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Marialuisa</given-names>
            <surname>Martelli</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2009</year>
          .
          <article-title>Reading development in an orthographically regular language: Effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability</article-title>
          . Reading and Writing,
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <issue>9</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>965</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>992</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>