<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Finding a
balance: The carolinas conversation collection.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The “Corpus Anchise 320” and the analysis of conversations between healthcare workers and people with dementia</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andrea Bolioli CELI</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Pietro Vigorelli Gruppo Anchise</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Alessandro Mazzei Università di Torino</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Nicola Benvenuti Università di Torino</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2018</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>160</fpage>
      <lpage>170</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The aim of this research was to create the first Italian corpus of free conversations between healthcare professionals and people with dementia, in order to investigate specific linguistic phenomena from a computational point of view. Most of the previous researches on speech disorders of people with dementia have been based on qualitative analysis, or on the study of a few dozen cases executed in laboratory conditions, and not in spontaneous speech (in particular for the Italian language). The creation of the Corpus Anchise 320 aims to investigate Dementia language by providing a broader number of dialogues collected in ecological conditions. Automatic linguistic analysis can help healthcare professionals to understand some characteristics of the language used by patients and to implement effective dialogue strategies.1</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>In this paper we will present the construction
of the first annotated corpus of conversations
between healthcare workers and people with
dementia for Italian, called “Corpus Anchise
320”, and the quantitative linguistic analysis we
carried out. The aim of the project is twofold. On
the one hand, we created a dataset of spoken
dialogue transcriptions that is useful for research
on the language of people with dementia. On the
other hand, techniques typical of computational
linguistics are applied to help doctors in assessing
the state of the disease and implement effective
dialogue strategies. Focusing attention on verbal
exchanges between speakers is one of the
1 Copyright ©2020 for this paper by its authors. Use
permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0
International (CC BY 4.0).
cornerstones of the approach developed by the
Anchise Group to support people with dementia
and their caregivers, i.e. the “Enabling Approach”
(Vigorelli 2018).</p>
      <p>The paper is divided in 4 sections. Section 1
introduces the topic of Alzheimer’s language
Section 2 presents the recent researches and
related works. In Section 3, the creation of the
Corpus Anchise 320 will be discussed, which
collects the transcripts and annotations of a set of
dialogues between healthcare professionals and
dementia patients carried out by the Anchise
Group from 2007 until today, in Italian language.
Section 4 will report the results of the
computational linguistic analysis with the
StanfordNLP library for Italian. The results
obtained will be discussed to outline some of the
peculiarities of the Dementia language. Section 5
concludes this paper with some final
considerations.
1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>The Alzheimer’s language</title>
      <p>
        Dementia refers to a series of symptoms that
manifest in “difficulties with memory, language,
problem solving and other cognitive skills that
affect a persons ability to perform everyday
activities.”
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">(Alzheimer's-Association 2018, 368)</xref>
        .
These symptoms change over time and reflect the
degree of neuronal damage in different parts of the
brain. Alzheimer's disease (AD), a
neurodegenerative brain disease, is the most
common form of dementia. One of the most
popular neuropsychological tests for assessing a
patient's neurocognitive and functional status is
still the Mini-Mental Test, designed by Folstein et
al. (1975).
      </p>
      <p>
        The first symptoms are memory loss or a state
of frequent confusion. Alzheimer's disease,
semantic dementia, aphasia and amnesia all share
a close link with lexical memory and therefore
declarative memory, while they would leave
grammar and procedural memory intact.
Language would thus move between a structural
component, formed by grammatical rules that are
stabilized over the course of life and are preserved
longer as a crystallized function; and a semantic
component that would collapse more quickly
because it requires a mnemonic and
contextualized effort that makes the cognitive
activity of the individual more complex. This
dissociation is confirmed by studies on
Alzheimer's language
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(Almor 1999)</xref>
        , (Kempler
2008), (Bucks 2000) in which it has been amply
demonstrated that one of the first symptoms is
anomia, or the difficulty in finding the lexical
target; as opposed to a good ability to construct
the sentence up to the advanced stages of the
disease. These deficits would then be
compensated through linguistic strategies, such as
the high use of pronouns, circumlocutions and
passepartout words present in the speech of
Alzheimer's patients: “empty words (“things”,
“do”, “he”, “it”, etc.) are successfully and
relatively easily activated precisely because they
are high in frequency and allow the patients to
produce fluent and grammatical sentences in the
presence of debilitating semantic deficits”
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(Almor
1999, 205)</xref>
        . In the more advanced stages of the
disease, communication becomes increasingly
problematic as Alzheimer's patients experience
difficulties in understanding and constructing a
coherent discourse: “their narratives are often
ripetitive with topic changes, unclear references,
and lack of coherence and informativeness”
(Kempler 2008, 76).
2
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Related works</title>
      <p>The recent workshop on the creation of medical
dialogues corpora (Bhatia et al. 2020) is a
consequence of an increasing interest on this
specific application field. The main reason of this
interest is on the possibility of design and realize
software applications which can assist
professionals in medicine in their daily work in
order to avoid errors: “It is imperative to find a
solution to minimize causes of such errors, via
better tooling and visualization or by providing
automated decision support assistants to medical
practitioners.”. With this final aim, the creation of
medical dialogues corpora can be seen as a first
step toward the creation of a virtual medical
assistant that can assist, speed-up, improve the
capacities of medical practitioners.</p>
      <p>As stated in (de la Fuente Garcia 2020)
“datasets containing both clinical information
and spontaneous speech suitable for statistical
learning are relatively scarce. In addition, speech
data are often collected under different
conditions, such as monologue and dialogue
recording protocols.” A notable example is the
Carolina Conversations Collection (CCC), that is
amongst the few spontaneous dialogue datasets
available in English in the context of AD research.
It is hosted and distributed by the Medical
University of South Carolina (Pope 2011).</p>
      <p>The study of AD language with computational
methods is fairly recent, but a number of work
showed the applicability of symbolic and statistic
algorithms for the prediction of dementia and
similar diseases (Karlekar et al. 2018, Mirheidari
et al. 2019, Kong et al. 2019).</p>
      <p>In (Karlekar et al. 2018) neural networks have
been used on the publicly available
DementiaBank dataset in order to predict
Alzheimer’s dementia of a patient starting from
the language produced and annotated with the
POS feature. They reached precision result
between 80-85%. Interestingly, they showed that
there is no significative difference between the
prediction results by considering the gender.
In (Mirheidari et al. 2019) an automatic dementia
detection system was presented, including a
diarisation unit, an automatic speech recogniser,
conversation analysis (CA) based acoustic and
lexical feature extraction module and a machine
learning classifier, in order to facilitate and
improve screening procedures for dementia. They
showed that using these features, they can obtain
a high value of precision in detecting dementia for
both a neurologist-patient and
VirtualAgentpatient conversations.</p>
      <p>In (Kong et al. 2019) neural networks on
DementiaBank dataset have been used too. They
reached precision results close to the state of art
(80-85%), but they pointed out on the scalability
of their neural methods that need less data.
Moreover, they showed that “the attention
mechanism of the model manages to capture
similar key concepts as the information unit
features specified by human experts.”.</p>
      <p>As for Italian language, in (Beltrami 2018) the
participants (both healthy and cognitively
impaired) were asked to answer to three specific
tasks, i.e. the description of a drawing, details of a
last dream and the description of a working day.
The researchers investigated whether the analysis
performed by Natural Language Processing
techniques could reveal alterations of the
language performance in early cognitive decline.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>The Corpus Anchise 320</title>
      <p>Corpus Anchise 320 collects the transcripts of
dialogues between healthcare professionals and
patients carried out over the period from 2007
until today by the Anchise Group, an association
of experts (doctors, psychologists, nurses,
trainers) for the research, training and care of the
elderly with dementia. The corpus consists of an
unselected series of people diagnosed with
dementia and not only those with an established
diagnosis with specific criteria for Alzheimer's
were included. For probabilistic reasons, most
patients are affected by AD. The corpus contains
320 individual conversations resulting from
transcription of about 15 minutes of dialogue for
each patient in which the patient can speak freely
with the health worker. This peculiarity is of
considerable importance in a field of investigation
that was mainly based on "formal
medicalpsychological situations of the anamnestic
investigation and the collection of tests" (Lai
2000).</p>
      <p>The corpus contains 20,588 turns of
conversation, consisting of 10,193 turns of
patients with dementia and 10,381 turns of health
workers. The total number of tokens is 222,856
and the total number of types (different words) is
14,513. In the table below we present a small
portion of one conversation.
7
8
9</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Forse sono loro che non capiscono.</title>
        <p>[Maybe it is they who do not understand.]</p>
        <p>The corpus has been created in two phases. In
the first phase, health professionals of Anchise
Group created the audio recordings, transcribed
portions of dialogues and annotated each
transcription with a series of metadata with the
aim of investigating the relationship between the
language, age, sex and stage of dementia (MMSE2
score). In the second phase, we collected the 320
transcriptions, we removed pragmalinguistic
comments of health professionals, such as
"[Touch the recorder]", "[Silence]", "[Laughs]",
etc., and we analyzed and annotated the corpus as
described in the following sections.</p>
        <p>Corpus Anchise 320 has been built and
archived according to EU General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR). Audio recording and
transcriptions were made with the consent of the
speaker, as far as possible, of the family member
and of the head of the facility or department.
Personal data have been anonymized. The dataset
is not publicly available but it can be requested to
the authors for research purposes.
4</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Computational linguistic analysis of</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Corpus Anchise 320</title>
      <p>In this Section we will discuss the results of the
lexical analysis (3.1) and of the morphosyntactic
analysis (3.2) carried out on the Corpus Anchise
320.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>3.1 Lexical analysis</title>
      <p>The Corpus Anchise 320 contains 222,856
tokens and 14,513 types. The relationship
between types and tokens constitutes the
TypesToken Ratio (TTR), which represents a type of
index to calculate the lexical richness of a text
(Torruella 2013). The number of tokens and types
were subsequently calculated for the patient's total
turns and the health worker’s total turns. The
results are shown in Table 2.</p>
      <p>Corpus
Anchise
Patients
Health
workers</p>
      <p>Token</p>
      <p>
        TTR is low for both speakers. As for the
patient, this trend is closely linked to Alzheimer's
disease, in which “the production of
highfrequency words is relatively preserved while the
production of low-frequency is impaired”
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(Almor
1999, 204)</xref>
        . As for the health professional, this
trend reflects the Grice Principle of Cooperation
between speakers in which it is necessary to
conform the conversational contribution to what
is required, when it occurs, by the accepted
common intent or by the direction of the verbal
exchange. Finally, if look at the number of tokens,
we get that the patients speak more but with a
poorer vocabulary relative to the lower lexical
richness index than the sample of the health
workers.
      </p>
      <p>A frequency list was then created on the corpus
sample of patients with dementia. The table 3 is
the result of a pre-processing phase where 4 types
of function words have been removed from the
frequency list, i.e. adpositions, determiners,
conjunctions and auxiliaries.</p>
      <p>From the analysis of the data it emerges that
the first 50 words in order of frequency cover 32%
of the entire Corpus Anchise 320 and 49.4% of the
patients' speech; the first 100 words cover 40.0%
of the entire corpus and 61.8% of that of patients
with dementia; the first 200 words cover 46.7% of
the entire corpus and 72.1% of the words used by
patients. This means that, on an expressive level,
patients with the use of 200 words cover almost
three quarters of all the vocabulary used in these
conversations.</p>
      <p>The analysis of the words most used by
patients diagnosed with dementia present in the
Corpus Anchises 320 shows a high percentage of
deictics, such as “io” (“me”), “qui” (“here”), “lì”
(“there”), and the presence of semantically empty
words, such as “cosa” (“thing”) and “cose”
3 Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato
(“things”). This attitude confirms the scientific
research carried out so far on Alzheimer's
language regarding word finding deficits: “the
earliest language deficits observed in DAT is
anomia. (...) Semantically empty words are
scattered throughout the DAT patient's utterances
in place of content words, thereby maintaining
fluency and sacrificing informational content."
(Kempler 1991, 98). From the analysis of the first
100 words used, we note the presence of the words
“casa” (“home”) with 637 occurrences, “mamma”
(“mother”) with 394 occurrences, “marito”
(“husband”) with 190 occurrences, “figli”
(”children”) with 162 occurrences. As the corpus
contains spontaneous speech, we can note that the
most common topic is the patient’s family.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>3.2 Morphosyntactic analysis</title>
      <p>The Corpus Anchise 320 was analyzed
morpho-syntactically by means of the
StanfordNLP library in Python language (Qi
2018). The default pre-trained neural model for
Italian was used. Specifically, tokenization,
lemmatization, POS tagging and Dependency
parsing were carried out. These annotations, i.e.
ID, Form, Lemma, POS, FEATS, HEAD,
DEPREL, were organized according to the
CoNLL-U format (Zeman 2018, Bosco 2014). A
linguist reviewed the automatic annotations.
ID TOKEN XPOS LEMMA FEATS HEAD DEPREL
3 che
4 fa
5 un
6 po'</p>
      <p>PRON che
VERB fare
DET
ADV
uno
poco
7 fatica</p>
      <p>NOUN fatica
8 a</p>
      <p>ADP</p>
      <p>a
9 parlare VERB parlare ...
...
...
...
...
...
...</p>
      <p>4
2
6
7
4
9
4
nsubj
acl:relcl
det
advmod
obj
mark
xcomp</p>
      <p>The analysis of the linguistic data of patients
suffering from dementia was made using both the
LIP3 corpus (De Mauro 1993, 155) and the speech
corpus of healthcare professionals as a reference.
The analysis of the percentages of occurrence of
the parts of speech, in the patient corpus sample,
reveals a superior use of pronouns and adverbs
both with respect to LIP and with respect to the
corpus of health workers. With reference to the
LIP, the use of pronouns records 10.9% of
occurrence, while the use of adverbs 10.1%. If we
compare these data with the rates of occurrence in
the patients' speech (Table 5), 13.9% frequency
for pronouns and 14.2% for adverbs respectively,
we notice a notable difference. Furthermore, these
two indices, when added together, are 1.7
percentage points higher than the health workers’
speech (ADV 13,2%, PRON 13,2 %). This trend
would confirm what was said in the analysis
relating to word frequency, i.e. the difficulty for
patients to access the lexicon and therefore to
compensate for this deficit with the use of
deictics, closely linked to the context. If we cross
these data with the rate of names used by patients
(1.6 percentage points lower than the corpus of the
health workers, NOUN 13,2%), we can deduce that
the patient implements a real compensatory
strategy linked to the impairment of access to
semantic memory. A significant difference is also
present with the LIP, which records a rate of
names of 15.7% against 11.6% of the corpus
relating to patients with dementia.</p>
      <p>ADJ</p>
      <p>At the morphosyntactic level, it is known in the
literature that Alzheimer's patients do not suffer
from serious deficits in the construction of the
sentence: "sentence production in DAT is
characterized by intact morphosyntactic structure
(i.e., subject verb agreement, well formed plural
and tense markings)”, (Kempler 2008, 75).
However, some linguistic phenomena that
emerged from the analysis of the occurrences of
the verbal system could be linked to a
spatialtemporal disorientation characteristic of
Alzheimer's disease (Macrì 2016). This
disorientation is reflected in the massive use of the
indicative mode present in 95.9% of cases (Table
6). The use of the subjunctive and conditional
modes appears to be almost minimal with
percentages that are around 1%. This tendency
could be paraphrased in terms of cognitive work,
since the two verbal modes require both the ability
to imagine possible worlds and - at the level of
sentence construction - of conjugation and
temporal concordance.</p>
      <p>Verb
form
Mood
Tense</p>
      <p>Fin
25.771
(72,9%)</p>
      <p>Ind
24.702
(95,9%)</p>
      <p>Pres
21.958
(71,9%)</p>
      <p>Inf
4.655
(13,2%)</p>
      <p>Sub
452
(1,8%)
Past
4.800
(15,7%)</p>
      <p>Part
4.751
(13,4%)</p>
      <p>Imp
326
(1,2%)
Imp
3.459
(11,33%)</p>
      <p>Ger
158
(0,4%)
Cnd
285
(1,1%)</p>
      <p>Fut
304
(0,9%)</p>
      <p>In this paper we presented the first Italian
corpus of conversations between healthcare
professionals and people with dementia, called
“Corpus Anchise 320”. The study of this corpus
with computational linguistic analysis confirmed
some characteristics of the language of people
with dementia, such as the reduction in the rate of
names and the increase in deictics. Corpus
Anchise 320 has been built and archived
according to GDPR. It is not publicly available
but it can be requested to the authors for research
purposes.</p>
      <p>The large number of the sample (320
conversations) and the use of computational
analysis will make it possible to identify
indicators of pathological language to be used in
the preclinical phase, to trace the change in the
linguistic abilities of people with dementia as the
disease progresses, to put in relation the
characteristics of the pathological language with a
series of metalinguistic data such as age, sex and
degree of dementia. The corpus will be increased
in the coming months with the addition and
annotation of other transcripts of dialogues of
people with dementia.</p>
      <sec id="sec-8-1">
        <title>Associazione Gruppo Anchise.</title>
        <p>http://www.formalzheimer.it/.</p>
        <p>P. Bhatia, S. Lin, R. Gangadharaiah, B. Wallace,
I. Shafran, C. Shivade, N. Du, and M. Diab,
editors. Proceedings of the First Workshop on
Natural Language Processing for Medical
Conversations, Online, July 2020. Association for
Computational Linguistics
Beltrami, D., Gagliardi, G., Rossini Favretti, R.,
Ghidoni, E., Tamburini, F., &amp; Calzà, L. (2018).
Speech analysis by natural language processing
techniques: a possible tool for very early detection
of cognitive decline?. Frontiers in aging
neuroscience, 10, 369.</p>
        <p>Bucks, R. S., Singh, S., Cuerden, J. M., &amp;
Wilcock, G. K. (2000). Analysis of spontaneous,
conversational speech in dementia of Alzheimer
type: Evaluation of an objective technique for
analysing lexical performance. Aphasiology,
14(1), 71-91.</p>
        <p>Bosco, C., Montemagni, S., Simi, M. (2013).
Converting Italian Treebanks: Towards an Italian
Stanford Treebanks.</p>
        <p>Bosco, C., Dell'Orletta, F., Montemagni, S.,
Sanguinetti, M., &amp; Simi, M. (2014). The
EVALITA 2014 dependency parsing task. In
EVALITA 2014 Evaluation of NLP and Speech
Tools for Italian (pp. 1-8). Pisa University Press.
de la Fuente Garcia, S., Haider, F., &amp; Luz, S.
(2020). Cross-corpus Feature Learning between
Spontaneous Monologue and Dialogue for
Automatic Classification of Alzheimer’s
Dementia Speech. In 2020 42nd Annual
International Conference of the IEEE
Engineering in Medicine &amp; Biology Society
(EMBC) (pp. 5851-5855). IEEE.</p>
        <p>De Mauro, T., Mancini, F., Vedovelli, M.,
Voghera, M. (1993). Lessico di frequenza
dell'italiano parlato. Milano: Etaslibri.</p>
        <p>Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., &amp; McHugh, P. R.
(1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method
for grading the cognitive state of patients for the
clinician. Journal of psychiatric research, 12(3),
189-198.</p>
        <p>S. Karlekar, T. Niu, and M. Bansal. Detecting
linguistic characteristics of Alzheimer’s dementia
by interpreting neural models. In Proceedings of
the 2018 Conference of the North American
Chapter of the Association for Computational
Linguistics: Human Language Technologies,
Volume 2 (Short Papers), pages 701–707, New
Orleans, Louisiana, June 2018. Association for
Computational Linguistics.</p>
        <p>Kempler, D. (1991). Language Changes in
Dementia of Alzheimer Type. In Dementia and
Communication, by Rosemary Lubinsky,
98114. Philadelphia: B.C. Decker, Inc.</p>
        <p>Kempler, D., &amp; Goral, M. (2008). Language and
dementia: Neuropsychological aspects. Annual
review of applied linguistics, 28, 73.</p>
        <p>W. Kong, H. Jang, G. Carenini, and T. Field. A
neural model for predicting dementia from
language. volume 106 of Proceedings of
Machine Learning Research, pages 270–286,
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 09–10 Aug 2019. PMLR.
Lai, G. (2000). Conversazioni con l'Alzheimer.
Prospettive sociali e sanitarie, 18, 2-5.</p>
        <p>Macrì, A. (2016). La lingua della demenza di
Alzheimer. Analisi linguistica del parlato
spontaneo. In Le lingue della malattia, 329-424.
Milano: Mimesis Edizioni.</p>
        <p>Mirheidari, B., Blackburn, D., Walker, T.,
Reuber, M., &amp; Christensen, H. (2019). Dementia
detection using automatic analysis of
conversations. Computer Speech &amp; Language,
53, 65-79.
Vigorelli, P. (2004). La conversazione possibile
con il malato Alzheimer. Milano: Franco Angeli
Editore.</p>
        <p>Zeman, D., Hajic, J., Popel, M., Potthast, M.,
Straka, M., Ginter, F., ... &amp; Petrov, S. (2018,
October). CoNLL 2018 shared task: Multilingual
parsing from raw text to universal dependencies.
In Proceedings of the CoNLL 2018 Shared Task:
Multilingual parsing from raw text to universal
dependencies (pp. 1-21).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alzheimer's-Association</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"2018 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures." Alzheimer's and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dementia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          :
          <fpage>367</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>429</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Almor</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kempler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , MacDonald,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Andersen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
            , &amp;
            <surname>Tyler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>L. K.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1999</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Why do Alzheimer patients have difficulty with pronouns? Working memory, semantics, and reference in comprehension and production in Alzheimer's disease</article-title>
          .
          <source>Brain and language</source>
          ,
          <volume>67</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>202</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>227</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>