<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>IISWS: Integrative Intelligent System for a Multi-Domain Diversified Semantic Search</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gerard Deepak</string-name>
          <email>gerard.deepak.christuni@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Santhanavijayan A</string-name>
          <email>vijayana@nitt.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>CEUR Workshop Proceedings</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>CEUR-WS.org</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Commons License Attribution 4.0 International</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>CC BY 4.0</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Content Based Filtering</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Hash Table, Knowledge Modeling, Ontologies, Semantic Latent Analysis, Semantic Web</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Tiruchirappalli</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IN">India</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4">
          <label>4</label>
          <institution>ISIC'21: International Semantic Intelligence Conference</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>February</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>296</fpage>
      <lpage>303</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The information density is steeply rising over the World Wide Web and there is an urgent need of an integrative intelligent approach for facilitating recommendations from the Web owing to the data density of the Web. Knowledge-Driven Web-based recommendation systems are required to reduce the cognitive gap between the user query and the recommendable contents. An recommendations from the Web has been proposed with the unification of SPARQL Endpoints from several heterogeneous sources through a domain indexing service that yields reasonable dynamic knowledge into the recommendation framework. The approach integrates classification, Synonymization, Intertwining with RDF, and a cognizable semantic similarity model for recommendation of queries and thereby the user relevant web pages with the diversification of search results. The proposed IISWS furnishes an overall accuracy of 91.84% with a small FDR of 0.1 for the WebKB Corpus dataset. A Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain of 0.91 has been achieved by the IISWS.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>perspicuous Semantic</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>The World Wide Web is the largest storehouse of
Information. The Web 2.0 is revolutionizing into the
Semantic Web</p>
      <p>which is the “Web of Data” with very
high
data
density
and
cohesiveness.</p>
      <p>Information
Extraction from the current configuration of the World
Wide Web is not just a laborious task but also involves a
lot of effort to link the user queries with the contents in
the World Wide Web. Even if there is a proper learning
mechanism
incorporated,
most
web-based
search
algorithms tend to lag owing to the density of the
information that looks quite similar. Most of the
Webbased recommendation system are either only
querycentered or user-centered. The query-centric web page
recommendation systems focus only on the relevance of
the web pages to the query that is being entered into the
system. However, when the web page recommendation
system is user-centric, the focus is mainly on the
personalization and satisfying the needs of the user. Most
of these queries centric and user-centric systems are quite
efficient and have tackled the problems of synonymy and
polysemy.</p>
      <p>2021 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative
reason
out, a strong semantic approach
with can
transform the existing data into knowledge or which can
incorporate knowledge for the recommendation. A
knowledge-centric web search is the most amicable in
the current situation where there is an evident transition
from the conventional Web to the Semantic Web. There
are also a large number of domain-centric knowledge
bases and RDF stores that are authorized and a few of
them</p>
      <p>are collective revised and newer versions are
released
progressively.</p>
      <p>It is
strategic
when
the
knowledge that has been dynamically integrated based
on Intertwining or Interlinking of the RDF structures
from the World Wide Web to the semantic inference
algorithm for facilitating knowledge-driven web search
and yield diversified and yet contents that are relevant to
the query and also satisfy the user needs, based on the
diversification of contents.</p>
      <p>Motivation:</p>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>Knowledge-Driven</title>
        <p>paradigms
with low computational complexity is the need of the
hour in Web-based Recommendation Systems to cater to
the demanding informational needs of users. Also, the
Web-based Recommendation Systems needs to be quite
lightweight by transforming the traditional learning
paradigm into reasoning based inferential strategy for
recommending</p>
        <p>query
information from the Web.</p>
        <p>relevant
and
user-relevant</p>
        <p>Contributions: A dynamic knowledge-centric
model for recommending queries and web pages based
on the standards and constructs of Web 3.0 has been
proposed. The approach integrates an initial
classification model that carefully selects the top-25% of
the most relevant results to cognitively enrich an RDF
driven real-world knowledge from a series of SPARQL
Endpoints based on the domain of relevance of the
Query. The strategy blends a WordNet 3.0 based
Synonymization as well as Intertwining Real-World
Knowledge through indexing services and SPARQL
Endpoints that are quite heterogeneous. Also, an
inferential cognizable semantic similarity by fusing the
Jaccard and the NPMI model is used to inferentially
select the recommendable entities. Experimentations are
conducted on the WebKB Corpus and an overall
accuracy of 0.91 with a reasonably small FDR of 0.1 has
been achieved. The proposed IISWS is validated by two
baseline models and knowledge-centric variations to
prove the efficacy of derived knowledge and its role in
web page recommendation.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-2">
        <title>Organization: The rest of paper is organized as</title>
        <p>follows. The Literature Survey is detailed in Section 2.
The Proposed Architecture is described in Section 3. The
Implementation in represented is in Section 4. The
Performance Evaluation are portrayed in Section 5. The
Conclusions are formulated in Section 6.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related Literature</title>
      <p>Soto et al., [1] have put forth a semantic search engine
which is domain-specific for biomedical abstracts that
update auxiliary knowledge from PubMed on a daily
basis. The search engine uses a NER approach for
biomedical entities and a context-sensitive Acronym
Resolution for concept recognition. Xie et al., [2] have
recommended web pages based on two-fold clustering
where the relationship between the user behavior and
topics are correlated. Bhavithra et al., [3] have
formulated an approach for case-based reasoning
focusing on clustering as a paradigm which is based on
weighted association rule mining for recommending web
pages. Singh et al., [4] have imbibed sequential rules
partially ordered web page recommendation which
predicts the future interests of the users’ web page
information. Katarya et al., [5] have incorporated the
fuzzy c-means clustering technique for the
recommendation of web pages that makes use of users’
navigation details of web pages.</p>
      <p>Ontologies have been used in several possible
combinations in several Web Search paradigms. Ali et
al., [6] have used Fuzzy Ontologies in combination with
SVM for web content classification. Thanapalasingam et
al., [7] have recommended editorial products based on
the domain ontology model. They have depicted the
usefulness of domain ontology and its impact in
recommendation specific to the computer science
domain. In [8-11] Deepak et al., have incorporated
several intelligent semantics paradigms in combination
with ontologies for recommending web contents in web
search and personalization. Deepak et al., [12] have
proposed the Differential Semantic Algorithm (DSA)
that uses differential threshold on semantic similarity
algorithms for facilitating personalized web search.
Elshaweesh et al., [13] have personalized and
recommended web pages based on user profile analysis,
latent semantic analysis, and the browsing behavior of
the user with semantic knowledge via the Ontologies.
Sumathi et al., [14] have proposed the IFWIAR for query
recommendation based on the usage of a domain specific
ontology with improved weighted fuzzy iterative
rulebased ontology processing. Though they have achieved
results that are appreciable, the knowledge sparsity is
visible as it is highly domain specific and integration of
real-world knowledge isn’t visible. Omar et al., [15] have
introduced a personalized approach for integrating
domain knowledge and user profile-based ontology for
transportation domain using WordNet API and semantic
conceptual knowledge.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Proposed Architecture</title>
      <p>
        Removal, and Lemmatization. On the pre-processing of
the query terms, a query word set is furnished. In order
to enhance the probability of integration of likewise
entities, the Query Word Set is subject to
Synonymization where several Synsets for a specific
query word is anchored with the Query word. The
Synonymization was done based on the integration with
a WordNet 3.0 synset generator, and several
relationships like the Homonym terms, and terms with
polysemous contents has been identified at this stage.
However, the synonyms generated with polysemous and
homonym terms are reserved for future knowledge
enrichment during the Intertwining phase.
The initial query words generated are subject to initial
level classification of the labelled dataset that has been
cleaned and pre-processed. The classification is done
based on a traditional Naïve Bayes Classifier by fixing
the class labels as the pre-processed query word set. The
reason for using a conventional classifier is mainly
owing to the reason that classification need not be
emphasized for being highly accurate, and the
methodology requires approximate classification for
future reasoning and inferencing during
recommendation. For each of the classes, top 25% of
classification results under each label, i.e., the query
word is taken into consideration and is transformed into
its equivalent RDF structure. Once the classification
results in the top 25% is transformed into RDF, the
process of Intertwining is performed where the RDF is
linked with real-world SPARQL Endpoint server to
associate the real-world entities along with their
equivalent class labels and formulate a linked RDF
structure with dynamic aggregation of real-world
ontological knowledge in the form of RDF data.
The initial query words generated are subject to initial
level classification of the labelled dataset that has been
cleaned and pre-processed. The classification is done
based on a traditional Naïve Bayes Classifier by fixing
the class labels as the pre-processed query word set. The
reason for using a conventional classifier is mainly
owing to the reason that classification need not be
emphasized for being highly accurate, and the
methodology requires approximate classification for
future reasoning and inferencing during
recommendation. For each of the classes, top 25% of
classification results under each label, i.e., the query
word is taken into consideration and is transformed into
its equivalent RDF structure. Once the classification
results in the top 25% is transformed into RDF, the
process of Intertwining is performed where the RDF is
linked with real-world SPARQL Endpoint server to
associate the real-world entities along with their
equivalent class labels and formulate a linked RDF
structure with dynamic aggregation of real-world
ontological knowledge in the form of RDF data.
The SPARQL Endpoint is linked to Wikidata, DBPedia,
LinedCT, voiD Data, and UniProt based on the query
centric domain relevant identification of entities.
However, each of these data stores and their domain
availability is identified with the help of an interim
repository that has been indexed with the domain and
sub-domain terminologies. Once the Intertwining has
been successfully staged, there is synonym induction that
has been computed previously in order to further enrich
the density of query centered domain knowledge based
on dynamic Ontology Generation through RDF
Intertwining. The RDF Intertwining generates extensive
Cognitive Knowledge for formulation of queries and
recommending query words based on Bigram and
Trigram integration. The methodology requires an
intelligent recommendation strategy for regulating the
query formulation which is done based on the
computation of the standard Jaccard Similarity and the
Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information Computation
Scheme, wherein the top 15% integration of common
elements from either of the two schemes has been
formulated. The recommendation strategy has been
depicted in the Intelligent Inference Algorithm that has
been depicted in the further sections. The
recommendation results are re-arranged in the declining
order of the values of semantic similarity, and further
yielded to the user. The results have a high degree of
diversity as the user has a lot of choices to select because
of the strategies followed in the proposed approach.
Further, if the user is dissatisfied with the yielded results,
then the query words are re-substituted by the current
user click sub-topics in the recommendation, and thereby
driving the recommendation to a much-focused topic and
thereby altering the feasible recommendable terms until
the user is satisfied. The semantic similarity is computed
using the intersection of the Jaccard Similarity and the
Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information (NPMI). The
Jaccard Similarity is computed with a threshold of 0.75
while the NPMI is considered between 0 and 1 without
yielding to its negative values. The threshold of 0.5 is
considered for the NPMI. Further the intersection of the
datapoints between the individual threshold of the
Jaccard Similarity and the NPMI is taken into
consideration for recommending the terms to formulate
queries and further choose the relevant web pages. The
Jaccard Similarity is depicted by Equation (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) and the
NPMI is depicted in Equation (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ). The Normalized
pointwise mutual information is dependent on the
pointwise mutual information measure portrayed by
Equation (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ). Equation (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ) illustrates the intersection
incidence of both the Jaccard Similarity and the
Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information measure.

SemanticSimilarity= |Jaccard | ∩ | NPMI |
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        )
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Implementation</title>
      <p>The implementation has been achieved using the Python
NLTK library and the OntoSpy library. However, the
SPARQL Wrapper interface was modeled with an agent
such that the SPARQL endpoints can be queried for
Intertwining. However, a customized domain index
repository has been used for mapping and indexing the
terms.
Step 4: while (Qsyn.next()!=NULL)
Tree IEnriched←Repeat Step 2 for Qsyn.current()
end while
Step 5: while (Qw.next()!=NULL)
Set J←JaccardSim(Qw, IEnriched.pos())
Set N←NPMI ((Qw, IEnriched.pos())
return R←J∩N
end while
Step 6: Choose any two levels from R as either super concepts or sub concepts or
From its neighbor and recommend by applying Bigram &amp; Trigram and
Recommend to the user.</p>
      <p>Step 7: Repeat Step 5 by matching elements of user-click and by not visiting a single
node more than once.</p>
      <p>Step 8: If there exist user clicks, then substitute the maximum topic of user click as
Qw and begin from Step 1 until there are no further user clicks.</p>
      <p>End
The proposed Integrative Intelligent Algorithm for Web
Page Recommendation is depicted in Table 1 which
takes input as the Classified Datasets based on the Query
Labels, Query Word Set, and SPARQL Endpoints via a
domain indexing service for the Real-World Knowledge
Stores. The Algorithm furnished the recommended
expanded queries at first, and further their corresponding
web pages. The algorithm selects the top 25% of the
classified data from each of the classes with query words
as a label and is transformed into its equivalent RDF.</p>
      <p>Further, the domain index for the class labels and
randomized classes is selected, and based on the domain
index a set of SPARQL Endpoints are selected for
including relevant real-World Knowledge for
Intertwining the RDF and formulate a Knowledge Tree,
which is further enriched based on the initial set of
synonyms generated. The generated synonyms are also
intertwined into real-world knowledge. The selection of
recommendable query entities is realized on the basis of
the semantic similarity computation and the
recommendation of queries is done by bigram and
trigram formulation based on user query clicks. The web
pages are selectively displayed based on the user-click of
the recommended queries. The process is continued until
each node of the enriched knowledge tree is visited or
until the user has no clicks recorded. If all the nodes of
the current knowledge tree have been visited, then the
last few user clicks are once again considered as query
words to facilitate newer recommendations until the user
is satisfied, i.e., till no further user clicks are recorded.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Performance Evaluation</title>
      <p>The experimentations for the proposed IISWS has been
carried out for the WebKB Corpus with 492 benchmark
test queries. 72 users were given 40 queries each to give
their top 10 recommendations in terms of both query
categories and individual web pages. However, each user
got different variations of the same query, and finally for
each query, top 10 frequently occurring webpage and the
queries were considered as ground truth for
experimentation.</p>
      <p>
        The Precision, Recall, Accuracy, F-Measure, and False
Discovery Rate (FDR) were used as standard metrics for
evaluating the performance of the proposed IISWS.
Also, nDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain)
was used to measure the diversity of the results yielded.
Equations (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ), (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ), (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ), (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ), and (9) depict the Precision,
Recall, Accuracy, F-Measure, and FDR. Equations (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">10</xref>
        )
and (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">11</xref>
        ) represent the Normalized Discounted
Cumulative Gain and the Discounted Cumulative Gain
respectively.
      </p>
      <p>Precision=Retrieved∩Relevant</p>
      <p>Retrieved
Recall=Retrieved∩Relevant</p>
      <p>
        Relevant
Accuracy=Precision+Recall
2
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        )
F-Measure=2×Precision×Recall
      </p>
      <p>Precision+Recall
FDR=1-PPV
pages that have been furnished by the proposed system.
The average performance evaluation for the WebKB
Corpus has been depicted in Table 2 where the proposed
IISWS and has been benchmarked with several other
models and variants of knowledge. Also, a variation
without specific knowledge model has been depicted.
The IISWS is also baselined with the Differential
Semantic Algorithm (DSA) [12] that uses a semantic
strategy for recommending web pages and IFWIAR [14]
that uses ontologies for yielding the web pages. The
experimentations are conducted for every baseline
models and other knowledge level variations in the same
environment as of the proposed IISWS.</p>
      <p>It is evident from Table 2 that the proposed IISWS
furnishes an average precision, recall, and accuracy of
90.21%, 93.47%, and 91.84% respectively. IISWS
furnished a very low FDR of 0.1 with an nDCG of 0.91
which is better performing than the baseline models and
its variants. The IISWS yields a 13.6% higher accuracy
than DSA and 6.38% higher accuracy than the IFWIAR.
The reason for a better performance of the IISWS than
the DSA is due to the reason that IISWS has an efficient
semantic model and heterogenous integrative knowledge
form several real-world knowledge resources through</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>SPARQL Endpoints.</title>
        <p>The DSA has a strong strategy of regulating the
recommendation by a combination of semantic similarity
measures with varied thresholds, however, the DSA only
focuses on personalization, and does not use any external
static knowledge or dynamic inferential knowledge.
IFWIAR encompasses Ontologies with fuzzy weighted
iterative association rule with static domain ontologies.
However, owing to the sparsity of domain ontologies
supplied into the IFWIAR, there is a predominant lag in
its performance.
Since the strategic amalgamation of auxiliary knowledge
along with a strong inferential semantic similarity model
is a requisite in the viscinity of the linked semantic data
for achieving a higher performance, variations in regard
to the knowledge models were demonstrated to show the
effectiveness of the IISWS model which has been put
forth. The replacement of the heterogeneous dynamic
knowledge model with a single source SPARQL
Endpoint decreased the Accuracy of the IISWS by
8.61%. Further, the use of Fuzzy Ontologies and the
Static Ontologies, decreased the Accuracy of IISWS by
7.4% and 5.91% respectively. When a Single Source
SPARQL Endpoint is incorporated, there is no sufficient
knowledge amalgamation for the current query.
However, when the Static Ontological Model is used,
there is sufficient auxiliary knowledge but modeling the
same is cumbersome. The Fuzzy Ontologies are
comparatively less domain-specific than that of the Static
Ontologies thereby exhibiting a lesser accuracy than that
of the Static Ontologies. Finally, in the absence of a
standard knowledge model in the environment of the
inferential recommendation model of the IISWS, the
accuracy decreased by 14.86% which clearly ensures that
amalgamation of real-world dense cognitive knowledge
reduces the strategic gap between the user-query and the
finally recommended items.</p>
        <p>The accuracy directly correlates with the Precision,
Recall, and F-Measure and is inversely proportional to
the FDR. With the increase in the Accuracy, there is a
significant decrease of the FDR. The IISWS has the
lowest FDR of 0.1 when compared to that of DSA and
IFWIAR and all the other variants. The distribution of
the percentage of F-Measure Vs the Number of
Recommendations for the proposed IISWS framework
and its variants of the baseline models is depicted in
Figure 2 from where it is clearly evident that the
FMeasure Distribution of the proposed IISWS is much
higher when compared to the other variants in terms of
knowledge and Ontological Models and the baseline
systems namely the DSA and the IFWIAR. The
proposed IISWS framework not just performs based on
the relevance of the finally recommended results but also
focuses on the diversification of results based on the
integration of knowledge from varied sources. The
diversity of results is quantitatively measured using the
nDCG. It is evident from Figure 3 that the nDCG is the
highest for the proposed IISWS framework and it
measures to 0.91. However, the DSA and IWFIAR have
a nDCG of 0.76 and 0.86 respectively. Even the variants
of knowledge like that of Static Ontology Models and the
Fuzzy Ontologies have a nDGC of 0.85 and 0.84
respectively. The Single Source SPARQL Endpoint has
a nDGC of 0.82. The absence of any knowledge model
has the lowest nDGC of 0.74. The reason for the
diversification is owing to the rich amount of entities that
are dynamically generated from a system of knowledge
stores and repositories based on the nature of domain
through SPARQL Endpoints. Since there is diversity and
the density in the supplied auxiliary knowledge, the
proposed IISWS outperforms the baseline approaches
and the other variants of the same algorithm in terms of
the knowledge models.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Conclusions</title>
      <p>An Intelligent Integrative approach for Knowledge
Centric web page recommendation has been proposed.
The IISWS system initially recommends diversified
queries and then the web pages on the basis of the
knowledge rendered by heterogenous SPARQL
Endpoints. The IISWS intelligently encompasses an
initial classification of the dataset to choose the top 25%
of each of the classification, which is further converted
into RDF that is further interlinked with real-world
knowledge stores through the Multi-source SPARQL
Endpoints based on selective domain integration. The
dynamic generation of the query relevant entities,
synonymization, and an efficient semantic
similaritybased recommendation of the web pages makes IISWS
as the most desirable web page recommendation system.
Moreover, the enrichment of knowledge into the system
ensures diversified and yet query relevant
recommendations. An overall accuracy of 0.91 with a
reasonably small FDR of 0.1 and a nDCG of 0.91 has
been attained by the proposed IISWS Framework for the
WebKB Corpus dataset.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Axel J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Piotr</surname>
            <given-names>Przybyła</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Sophia</given-names>
            <surname>Ananiadou</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Thalia: semantic search engine for biomedical abstracts</article-title>
          .
          <source>" Bioinformatics</source>
          <volume>35</volume>
          .10 (
          <year>2019</year>
          ):
          <fpage>1799</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1801</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Xie</surname>
            , Xianfen, and
            <given-names>Binhui</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Web page recommendation via twofold clustering: considering user behavior and topic relation</article-title>
          .
          <source>" Neural Computing and Applications</source>
          <volume>29</volume>
          .1 (
          <year>2018</year>
          ):
          <fpage>235</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>243</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bhavithra</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Saradha</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Personalized web page recommendation using case-based clustering and weighted association rule mining</article-title>
          .
          <source>Cluster Computing</source>
          ,
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>6991</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7002</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Singh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kaur</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kaur</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Web page recommendation system based on partially ordered sequential rules</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Intelligent &amp; Fuzzy Systems</source>
          ,
          <volume>32</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>3009</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3015</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Katarya</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Rahul, and Om Prakash Verma.
          <article-title>"An effective web page recommender system with fuzzy cmean clustering</article-title>
          .
          <source>" Multimedia Tools and Applications</source>
          <volume>76</volume>
          .20 (
          <year>2017</year>
          ):
          <fpage>21481</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>21496</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ali</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Khan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Riaz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kwak</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abuhmed</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Park</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kwak</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <article-title>A fuzzy ontology and SVM-based Web content classification system</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Access</source>
          ,
          <volume>5</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>25781</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>25797</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thanapalasingam</surname>
            <given-names>T</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Osborne</surname>
            <given-names>F</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Birukou</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Motta</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Ontology-based recommendation of editorial products</article-title>
          .
          <source>InInternational Semantic Web Conference 2018 Oct</source>
          <volume>8</volume>
          (pp.
          <fpage>341</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>358</lpage>
          ). Springer, Cham.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Deepak</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ahmed</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Skanda</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>An intelligent inventive system for personalised webpage recommendation based on ontology semantics</article-title>
          .
          <source>In the International Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications</source>
          ,
          <volume>18</volume>
          (
          <issue>1-2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>115</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>132</lpage>
          . [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Deepak</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Priyadarshini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Personalized and Enhanced Hybridized Semantic Algorithm for web image retrieval incorporating ontology classification, strategic query expansion, and content-based analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers &amp; Electrical Engineering</source>
          ,
          <volume>72</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>14</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>25</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bhavithra</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Saradha</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Personalized web page recommendation using case-based clustering and weighted association rule mining</article-title>
          .
          <source>" Cluster Computing 22.3</source>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ):
          <fpage>6991</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7002</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Deepak</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Santhanavijayan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>OntoBstFit: A Best-Fit Occurrence Estimation strategy for RDF driven faceted semantic search</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computer Communications</source>
          ,
          <volume>160</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>284</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>298</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Deepak</surname>
            , Gerard,
            <given-names>J. Sheeba</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Priyadarshini</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and MS Hareesh Babu.
          <article-title>"A differential semantic algorithm for query relevant web page recommendation</article-title>
          .
          <source>" 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Computer</source>
          , ICACA, Coimbatore, India.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>ElShaweesh</surname>
            <given-names>O</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hussain</surname>
            <given-names>FK</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lu</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Al-Hassan</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kharazmi S</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Personalized Web Search Based on Ontological User Profile in Transportation Domain</article-title>
          .
          <source>InInternational Conference on Neural Information Processing 2017 Nov</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (pp.
          <fpage>239</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>248</lpage>
          ). Springer, Cham.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sumathi</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Akilandeswari</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Improved fuzzy weighted‐iterative association rule-based ontology postprocessing in data mining for query recommendation applications</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computational Intelligence</source>
          . 2020 May;
          <volume>36</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>773</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>82</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Al-Hassan</surname>
            , Malak, and
            <given-names>Sadegh</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kharazmi</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Personalized Web Search Based on Ontological User Profile in Transportation Domain."</article-title>
          <source>In Neural Information Processing: 24th International Conference, ICONIP</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          ,
          <article-title>Guangzhou</article-title>
          .,China,
          <fpage>November14</fpage>
          -
          <volume>18</volume>
          , 20 p.
          <fpage>239</fpage>
          , Proceedings by Springer,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>