=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-2786/Paper37 |storemode=property |title=IISWS: Integrative Intelligent System for a Multi-Domain Diversified Semantic Search |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2786/Paper37.pdf |volume=Vol-2786 |authors=Gerard Deepak,Santhanavijayan A |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/isic2/DeepakA21 }} ==IISWS: Integrative Intelligent System for a Multi-Domain Diversified Semantic Search== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2786/Paper37.pdf
                                                                                                                                                296




          IISWS: Integrative Intelligent System for a Multi-Domain
                       Diversified Semantic Search
  Gerard Deepak a, Santhanavijayan A a
 aDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, India




          Abstract
          The information density is steeply rising over the World Wide Web and there is an urgent need of an integrative
          intelligent approach for facilitating recommendations from the Web owing to the data density of the Web.
          Knowledge-Driven Web-based recommendation systems are required to reduce the cognitive gap between the user
          query and the recommendable contents. An Integrative Intelligent approach for knowledge-centric
          recommendations from the Web has been proposed with the unification of SPARQL Endpoints from several
          heterogeneous sources through a domain indexing service that yields reasonable dynamic knowledge into the
          recommendation framework. The approach integrates classification, Synonymization, Intertwining with RDF, and
          a cognizable semantic similarity model for recommendation of queries and thereby the user relevant web pages
          with the diversification of search results. The proposed IISWS furnishes an overall accuracy of 91.84% with a small
          FDR of 0.1 for the WebKB Corpus dataset. A Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain of 0.91 has been achieved
          by the IISWS.

          Keywords
          Content Based Filtering, Hash Table, Knowledge Modeling, Ontologies, Semantic Latent Analysis, Semantic Web


1. Introduction                                                                               These systems do not facilitate the diversification of
                                                                                              search results as there is a sparsity of real-world
The World Wide Web is the largest storehouse of                                               knowledge that is being instilled into the system. Owing
Information. The Web 2.0 is revolutionizing into the                                          to the evolution of the existing Web 2.0 into a
Semantic Web which is the “Web of Data” with very                                             perspicuous Semantic Web, a large amount of data
high data density and cohesiveness. Information                                               available on the current structure of the Web and to
Extraction from the current configuration of the World                                        reason out, a strong semantic approach with can
Wide Web is not just a laborious task but also involves a                                     transform the existing data into knowledge or which can
lot of effort to link the user queries with the contents in                                   incorporate knowledge for the recommendation. A
the World Wide Web. Even if there is a proper learning                                        knowledge-centric web search is the most amicable in
mechanism incorporated, most web-based search                                                 the current situation where there is an evident transition
algorithms tend to lag owing to the density of the                                            from the conventional Web to the Semantic Web. There
information that looks quite similar. Most of the Web-                                        are also a large number of domain-centric knowledge
based recommendation system are either only query-                                            bases and RDF stores that are authorized and a few of
centered or user-centered. The query-centric web page                                         them are collective revised and newer versions are
recommendation systems focus only on the relevance of                                         released progressively. It is strategic when the
the web pages to the query that is being entered into the                                     knowledge that has been dynamically integrated based
system. However, when the web page recommendation                                             on Intertwining or Interlinking of the RDF structures
system is user-centric, the focus is mainly on the                                            from the World Wide Web to the semantic inference
personalization and satisfying the needs of the user. Most                                    algorithm for facilitating knowledge-driven web search
of these queries centric and user-centric systems are quite                                   and yield diversified and yet contents that are relevant to
efficient and have tackled the problems of synonymy and                                       the query and also satisfy the user needs, based on the
polysemy.                                                                                     diversification of contents.

                                                                                                       Motivation: Knowledge-Driven paradigms
ISIC’21: International Semantic Intelligence Conference, February                             with low computational complexity is the need of the
25-27, 2021, Delhi, India                                                                     hour in Web-based Recommendation Systems to cater to
:gerard.deepak.christuni@gmail.com(Gerard Deepak);
vijayana@nitt.edu (Santhanavijayan A)                                                         the demanding informational needs of users. Also, the
ORCID: 0000-0003-0466-2143 (Gerard Deepak)                                                    Web-based Recommendation Systems needs to be quite
              ©️ 2021 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative
              Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).                      lightweight by transforming the traditional learning
              CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)                                         paradigm into reasoning based inferential strategy for
                                                                                              recommending query relevant and user-relevant
                                                                                              information from the Web.


                                                                                                                                                       1
                                                                                                              297




          Contributions: A dynamic knowledge-centric         domain. In [8-11] Deepak et al., have incorporated
model for recommending queries and web pages based           several intelligent semantics paradigms in combination
on the standards and constructs of Web 3.0 has been          with ontologies for recommending web contents in web
proposed.       The approach integrates an initial           search and personalization. Deepak et al., [12] have
classification model that carefully selects the top-25% of   proposed the Differential Semantic Algorithm (DSA)
the most relevant results to cognitively enrich an RDF       that uses differential threshold on semantic similarity
driven real-world knowledge from a series of SPARQL          algorithms for facilitating personalized web search.
Endpoints based on the domain of relevance of the
Query. The strategy blends a WordNet 3.0 based               Elshaweesh et al., [13] have personalized and
Synonymization as well as Intertwining Real-World            recommended web pages based on user profile analysis,
Knowledge through indexing services and SPARQL               latent semantic analysis, and the browsing behavior of
Endpoints that are quite heterogeneous. Also, an             the user with semantic knowledge via the Ontologies.
inferential cognizable semantic similarity by fusing the     Sumathi et al., [14] have proposed the IFWIAR for query
Jaccard and the NPMI model is used to inferentially          recommendation based on the usage of a domain specific
select the recommendable entities. Experimentations are      ontology with improved weighted fuzzy iterative rule-
conducted on the WebKB Corpus and an overall                 based ontology processing. Though they have achieved
accuracy of 0.91 with a reasonably small FDR of 0.1 has      results that are appreciable, the knowledge sparsity is
been achieved. The proposed IISWS is validated by two        visible as it is highly domain specific and integration of
baseline models and knowledge-centric variations to          real-world knowledge isn’t visible. Omar et al., [15] have
prove the efficacy of derived knowledge and its role in      introduced a personalized approach for integrating
web page recommendation.                                     domain knowledge and user profile-based ontology for
                                                             transportation domain using WordNet API and semantic
         Organization: The rest of paper is organized as     conceptual knowledge.
follows. The Literature Survey is detailed in Section 2.
The Proposed Architecture is described in Section 3. The
Implementation in represented is in Section 4. The           3. Proposed Architecture
Performance Evaluation are portrayed in Section 5. The
Conclusions are formulated in Section 6.                      Figure 1 judiciously describes the architecture of the
                                                             proposed which intelligently integrates the phases of
                                                             initial classification and integration of real-world
2. Related Literature                                        knowledge to facilitate web page recommendation. The
                                                             proposed IISWS does not make use of any static
Soto et al., [1] have put forth a semantic search engine
which is domain-specific for biomedical abstracts that       ontologies or knowledge resources, instead a dynamic
update auxiliary knowledge from PubMed on a daily            ontology modeling scheme for upper ontology derivation
basis. The search engine uses a NER approach for             has been imbibed into the approach using existing real-
biomedical entities and a context-sensitive Acronym          world collaborative cognitive knowledge to ensure that
Resolution for concept recognition. Xie et al., [2] have     recommendations are not restricted to the conceptual
recommended web pages based on two-fold clustering           level but also yield enough individuals when there is a
where the relationship between the user behavior and
                                                             conflict of interest, specifically when homonymous
topics are correlated. Bhavithra et al., [3] have
formulated an approach for case-based reasoning              terms are identified by the Web Search System. The core
focusing on clustering as a paradigm which is based on       principle behind the IISWS is to overcome the Sparsity
weighted association rule mining for recommending web        problem in Web Search and strategically overcome the
pages. Singh et al., [4] have imbibed sequential rules       problems of synonymy, polysemy, and homonymy.
partially ordered web page recommendation which              Also, the design of IISWS is in away such that
predicts the future interests of the users’ web page
                                                             Serendipity problem is also overcome by ensuring the
information. Katarya et al., [5] have incorporated the
fuzzy c-means clustering technique for the                   user query is subject to Query Pre-processing such as the
recommendation of web pages that makes use of users’         Tokenization, Stop Word
navigation details of web pages.
                                                             Removal, and Lemmatization. On the pre-processing of
Ontologies have been used in several possible                the query terms, a query word set is furnished. In order
combinations in several Web Search paradigms. Ali et         to enhance the probability of integration of likewise
al., [6] have used Fuzzy Ontologies in combination with      entities, the Query Word Set is subject to
SVM for web content classification. Thanapalasingam et       Synonymization where several Synsets for a specific
al., [7] have recommended editorial products based on
                                                             query word is anchored with the Query word. The
the domain ontology model. They have depicted the
usefulness of domain ontology and its impact in              Synonymization was done based on the integration with
recommendation specific to the computer science              a WordNet 3.0 synset generator, and several



                                                                                                                     2
                                                                                                                298




relationships like the Homonym terms, and terms with
polysemous contents has been identified at this stage.
However, the synonyms generated with polysemous and
homonym terms are reserved for future knowledge
enrichment during the Intertwining phase.




                                     Figure 1: Architecture of the Proposed IISWS

The initial query words generated are subject to initial       owing to the reason that classification need not be
level classification of the labelled dataset that has been     emphasized for being highly accurate, and the
cleaned and pre-processed. The classification is done          methodology requires approximate classification for
based on a traditional Naïve Bayes Classifier by fixing        future      reasoning     and     inferencing     during
the class labels as the pre-processed query word set. The      recommendation. For each of the classes, top 25% of
reason for using a conventional classifier is mainly           classification results under each label, i.e., the query
owing to the reason that classification need not be            word is taken into consideration and is transformed into
emphasized for being highly accurate, and the                  its equivalent RDF structure. Once the classification
methodology requires approximate classification for            results in the top 25% is transformed into RDF, the
future      reasoning      and     inferencing      during     process of Intertwining is performed where the RDF is
recommendation. For each of the classes, top 25% of            linked with real-world SPARQL Endpoint server to
classification results under each label, i.e., the query       associate the real-world entities along with their
word is taken into consideration and is transformed into       equivalent class labels and formulate a linked RDF
its equivalent RDF structure. Once the classification          structure with dynamic aggregation of real-world
results in the top 25% is transformed into RDF, the            ontological knowledge in the form of RDF data.
process of Intertwining is performed where the RDF is
linked with real-world SPARQL Endpoint server to               The SPARQL Endpoint is linked to Wikidata, DBPedia,
associate the real-world entities along with their             LinedCT, voiD Data, and UniProt based on the query
equivalent class labels and formulate a linked RDF             centric domain relevant identification of entities.
structure with dynamic aggregation of real-world               However, each of these data stores and their domain
ontological knowledge in the form of RDF data.                 availability is identified with the help of an interim
                                                               repository that has been indexed with the domain and
The initial query words generated are subject to initial       sub-domain terminologies. Once the Intertwining has
level classification of the labelled dataset that has been     been successfully staged, there is synonym induction that
cleaned and pre-processed. The classification is done          has been computed previously in order to further enrich
based on a traditional Naïve Bayes Classifier by fixing        the density of query centered domain knowledge based
the class labels as the pre-processed query word set. The      on dynamic Ontology Generation through RDF
reason for using a conventional classifier is mainly           Intertwining. The RDF Intertwining generates extensive



                                                                                                                      3
                                                                                                                299




Cognitive Knowledge for formulation of queries and               queries and further choose the relevant web pages. The
recommending query words based on Bigram and                     Jaccard Similarity is depicted by Equation (1) and the
Trigram integration. The methodology requires an                 NPMI is depicted in Equation (2). The Normalized
intelligent recommendation strategy for regulating the           pointwise mutual information is dependent on the
query formulation which is done based on the                     pointwise mutual information measure portrayed by
computation of the standard Jaccard Similarity and the           Equation (3). Equation (4) illustrates the intersection
Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information Computation              incidence of both the Jaccard Similarity and the
Scheme, wherein the top 15% integration of common                Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information measure.
elements from either of the two schemes has been
                                                                                      | 𝑆 ∩ 𝑇|
formulated. The recommendation strategy has been                 𝐽𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑑(𝑆, 𝑇)                                (1)
                                                                                 |𝑆| + |𝑇| − |𝑆 ∩ 𝑇|
depicted in the Intelligent Inference Algorithm that has
been depicted in the further sections. The
recommendation results are re-arranged in the declining
order of the values of semantic similarity, and further                            𝑝𝑚𝑖(𝑥; 𝑦)
                                                                 𝑛𝑝𝑚𝑖(𝑥; 𝑦) =                                 (2)
yielded to the user. The results have a high degree of                           − log[𝑝(𝑥, 𝑦)]
diversity as the user has a lot of choices to select because
of the strategies followed in the proposed approach.
Further, if the user is dissatisfied with the yielded results,   𝑝𝑚𝑖(𝑥; 𝑦) = ℎ(𝑥) + ℎ(𝑦) − ℎ(𝑥, 𝑦)            (3)
then the query words are re-substituted by the current
user click sub-topics in the recommendation, and thereby
driving the recommendation to a much-focused topic and
                                                                  SemanticSimilarity= |Jaccard | ∩ | NPMI |   (4)
thereby altering the feasible recommendable terms until
the user is satisfied. The semantic similarity is computed
using the intersection of the Jaccard Similarity and the
Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information (NPMI). The              4. Implementation
Jaccard Similarity is computed with a threshold of 0.75
                                                                 The implementation has been achieved using the Python
while the NPMI is considered between 0 and 1 without
                                                                 NLTK library and the OntoSpy library. However, the
yielding to its negative values. The threshold of 0.5 is
                                                                 SPARQL Wrapper interface was modeled with an agent
considered for the NPMI. Further the intersection of the
                                                                 such that the SPARQL endpoints can be queried for
datapoints between the individual threshold of the
                                                                 Intertwining. However, a customized domain index
Jaccard Similarity and the NPMI is taken into
                                                                 repository has been used for mapping and indexing the
consideration for recommending the terms to formulate
                                                                 terms.



              Table 1: Proposed Integrative Intelligent Algorithm (IIA) for Web Page Recommendation

           Input: Initially Classified Dataset based on the Query Words as Labels, Query Word Set w, Real
           World Knowledge Bases,
           Output: Recommended Expanded Queries and their corresponding Web Pages
           Begin
           Step 1: while (Qw.next()!=NULL)
           for each Qw as Label
           HashSet R’ ←Select Top 25% and Convert into RDF
           end for
           end while
           Step 2: for each in R’
           2.1Select the domain index for R’.current() from a Thesauri
           2.2 Based on Index Domain trigger SPARQLEndpoint
           2.3 Generate Intertwined Knowledge as Tree Iw
           end for
           Step 3: Generate SynSets of Qw as Qsyn



                                                                                                                      4
                                                                                                                    300




           Step 4: while (Qsyn.next()!=NULL)
           Tree IEnriched←Repeat Step 2 for Qsyn.current()
           end while
           Step 5: while (Qw.next()!=NULL)
           Set J←JaccardSim(Qw, IEnriched.pos())
           Set N←NPMI ((Qw, IEnriched.pos())
           return R←J∩N
           end while
           Step 6: Choose any two levels from R as either super concepts or sub concepts or
           From its neighbor and recommend by applying Bigram & Trigram and
           Recommend to the user.
           Step 7: Repeat Step 5 by matching elements of user-click and by not visiting a single
           node more than once.
           Step 8: If there exist user clicks, then substitute the maximum topic of user click as
           Qw and begin from Step 1 until there are no further user clicks.
           End



The proposed Integrative Intelligent Algorithm for Web            5. Performance Evaluation
Page Recommendation is depicted in Table 1 which
takes input as the Classified Datasets based on the Query         The experimentations for the proposed IISWS has been
Labels, Query Word Set, and SPARQL Endpoints via a                carried out for the WebKB Corpus with 492 benchmark
domain indexing service for the Real-World Knowledge              test queries. 72 users were given 40 queries each to give
Stores. The Algorithm furnished the recommended                   their top 10 recommendations in terms of both query
expanded queries at first, and further their corresponding        categories and individual web pages. However, each user
web pages. The algorithm selects the top 25% of the               got different variations of the same query, and finally for
classified data from each of the classes with query words         each query, top 10 frequently occurring webpage and the
as a label and is transformed into its equivalent RDF.            queries were considered as ground truth for
Further, the domain index for the class labels and                experimentation.
randomized classes is selected, and based on the domain
index a set of SPARQL Endpoints are selected for                  The Precision, Recall, Accuracy, F-Measure, and False
including relevant real-World Knowledge for                       Discovery Rate (FDR) were used as standard metrics for
Intertwining the RDF and formulate a Knowledge Tree,              evaluating the performance of the proposed IISWS.
which is further enriched based on the initial set of             Also, nDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain)
synonyms generated. The generated synonyms are also               was used to measure the diversity of the results yielded.
intertwined into real-world knowledge. The selection of           Equations (5), (6), (7), (8), and (9) depict the Precision,
recommendable query entities is realized on the basis of          Recall, Accuracy, F-Measure, and FDR. Equations (10)
the semantic similarity computation and the                       and (11) represent the Normalized Discounted
recommendation of queries is done by bigram and                   Cumulative Gain and the Discounted Cumulative Gain
trigram formulation based on user query clicks. The web           respectively.
pages are selectively displayed based on the user-click of
                                                                               Retrieved∩Relevant
the recommended queries. The process is continued until           Precision=                              (5)
                                                                                   Retrieved
each node of the enriched knowledge tree is visited or
until the user has no clicks recorded. If all the nodes of        Recall=
                                                                            Retrieved∩Relevant
                                                                                                         (6)
                                                                                 Relevant
the current knowledge tree have been visited, then the
last few user clicks are once again considered as query                        Precision+Recall
words to facilitate newer recommendations until the user          Accuracy=                               (7)
                                                                                      2
is satisfied, i.e., till no further user clicks are recorded.




                                                                                                                           5
                                                                                                                  301




             2×Precision×Recall                                  models and other knowledge level variations in the same
F-Measure=                               (8)
               Precision+Recall
                                                                 environment as of the proposed IISWS.
FDR=1-PPV                                 (9)                    It is evident from Table 2 that the proposed IISWS
                                                                 furnishes an average precision, recall, and accuracy of
         DCGα
nDCG =                                   (10)                    90.21%, 93.47%, and 91.84% respectively. IISWS
         IDCGα                                                   furnished a very low FDR of 0.1 with an nDCG of 0.91
           ∝                                                     which is better performing than the baseline models and
                    𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑖                                         its variants. The IISWS yields a 13.6% higher accuracy
𝐷𝐶𝐺 = ∑                                  (11)                    than DSA and 6.38% higher accuracy than the IFWIAR.
                 𝑙𝑜𝑔(𝑖 + 1)
          𝑖=1                                                    The reason for a better performance of the IISWS than
Since Query Recommendation is followed by the web                the DSA is due to the reason that IISWS has an efficient
page recommendation in the proposed IISWS, the                   semantic model and heterogenous integrative knowledge
performance measures were computed for the final web             form several real-world knowledge resources through
pages that have been furnished by the proposed system.           SPARQL Endpoints.
The average performance evaluation for the WebKB
Corpus has been depicted in Table 2 where the proposed           The DSA has a strong strategy of regulating the
IISWS and has been benchmarked with several other                recommendation by a combination of semantic similarity
models and variants of knowledge. Also, a variation              measures with varied thresholds, however, the DSA only
without specific knowledge model has been depicted.              focuses on personalization, and does not use any external
The IISWS is also baselined with the Differential                static knowledge or dynamic inferential knowledge.
Semantic Algorithm (DSA) [12] that uses a semantic               IFWIAR encompasses Ontologies with fuzzy weighted
strategy for recommending web pages and IFWIAR [14]              iterative association rule with static domain ontologies.
that uses ontologies for yielding the web pages. The             However, owing to the sparsity of domain ontologies
experimentations are conducted for every baseline                supplied into the IFWIAR, there is a predominant lag in
                                                                 its performance.



                            Table :2 Performance Analysis of the Proposed IISWS Framework

         Model/ Variants                             Precision       Recall      Accuracy       FDR     nDCG
                                                     %               %           %

         DSA                                         76.14           79.74       78.24          0.24    0.76



         IFWIAR                                      84.17           86.74       85.46          0.16    0.86

         Static Ontological Model                    84.12           87.74       85.93          0.16    0.85

         Fuzzy Ontologies                            83.14           85.74       84.44          0.17    0.84

         Without any Knowledge Model                 79.47           81.14       76.98          0.21    0.74



         Single Source SPARQL Endpoint               82.14           84.32       83.23          0.18    0.82

         Proposed IISWS                              90.21           93.47       91.84          0.1     0.91




                                                                                                                        6
                                                                                                                 302




                                                              Recommendations for the proposed IISWS framework
                                                              and its variants of the baseline models is depicted in
                                                              Figure 2 from where it is clearly evident that the F-
                                                              Measure Distribution of the proposed IISWS is much
                                                              higher when compared to the other variants in terms of
                                                              knowledge and Ontological Models and the baseline
                                                              systems namely the DSA and the IFWIAR. The
                                                              proposed IISWS framework not just performs based on
                                                              the relevance of the finally recommended results but also
                                                              focuses on the diversification of results based on the
                                                              integration of knowledge from varied sources. The
                                                              diversity of results is quantitatively measured using the
                                                              nDCG. It is evident from Figure 3 that the nDCG is the
                                                              highest for the proposed IISWS framework and it
                                                              measures to 0.91. However, the DSA and IWFIAR have
                                                              a nDCG of 0.76 and 0.86 respectively. Even the variants
         Figure 2: F-Measure Vs Number of                     of knowledge like that of Static Ontology Models and the
                 Recommendations                              Fuzzy Ontologies have a nDGC of 0.85 and 0.84
                                                              respectively. The Single Source SPARQL Endpoint has
Since the strategic amalgamation of auxiliary knowledge       a nDGC of 0.82. The absence of any knowledge model
along with a strong inferential semantic similarity model     has the lowest nDGC of 0.74. The reason for the
is a requisite in the viscinity of the linked semantic data   diversification is owing to the rich amount of entities that
for achieving a higher performance, variations in regard      are dynamically generated from a system of knowledge
to the knowledge models were demonstrated to show the         stores and repositories based on the nature of domain
effectiveness of the IISWS model which has been put           through SPARQL Endpoints. Since there is diversity and
forth. The replacement of the heterogeneous dynamic           the density in the supplied auxiliary knowledge, the
knowledge model with a single source SPARQL                   proposed IISWS outperforms the baseline approaches
Endpoint decreased the Accuracy of the IISWS by               and the other variants of the same algorithm in terms of
8.61%. Further, the use of Fuzzy Ontologies and the           the knowledge models.
Static Ontologies, decreased the Accuracy of IISWS by
7.4% and 5.91% respectively. When a Single Source             6. Conclusions
SPARQL Endpoint is incorporated, there is no sufficient
knowledge amalgamation for the current query.                 An Intelligent Integrative approach for Knowledge
However, when the Static Ontological Model is used,           Centric web page recommendation has been proposed.
there is sufficient auxiliary knowledge but modeling the      The IISWS system initially recommends diversified
same is cumbersome. The Fuzzy Ontologies are                  queries and then the web pages on the basis of the
comparatively less domain-specific than that of the Static    knowledge rendered by             heterogenous SPARQL
Ontologies thereby exhibiting a lesser accuracy than that     Endpoints. The IISWS intelligently encompasses an
of the Static Ontologies. Finally, in the absence of a        initial classification of the dataset to choose the top 25%
standard knowledge model in the environment of the            of each of the classification, which is further converted
inferential recommendation model of the IISWS, the            into RDF that is further interlinked with real-world
accuracy decreased by 14.86% which clearly ensures that       knowledge stores through the Multi-source SPARQL
amalgamation of real-world dense cognitive knowledge          Endpoints based on selective domain integration. The
reduces the strategic gap between the user-query and the      dynamic generation of the query relevant entities,
finally recommended items.                                    synonymization, and an efficient semantic similarity-
                                                              based recommendation of the web pages makes IISWS
The accuracy directly correlates with the Precision,          as the most desirable web page recommendation system.
Recall, and F-Measure and is inversely proportional to        Moreover, the enrichment of knowledge into the system
the FDR. With the increase in the Accuracy, there is a        ensures diversified and yet query relevant
significant decrease of the FDR. The IISWS has the            recommendations. An overall accuracy of 0.91 with a
lowest FDR of 0.1 when compared to that of DSA and            reasonably small FDR of 0.1 and a nDCG of 0.91 has
IFWIAR and all the other variants. The distribution of
the percentage of F-Measure Vs the Number of


                                                                                                                        7
                                                                                                           303




been attained by the proposed IISWS Framework for the
WebKB Corpus dataset.
                                                            [9]Deepak, G., & Priyadarshini, J. S. (2018).
                                                            Personalized and Enhanced Hybridized Semantic
References                                                  Algorithm for web image retrieval incorporating
                                                            ontology classification, strategic query expansion, and
[1] Soto, Axel J., Piotr Przybyła, and Sophia Ananiadou.    content-based analysis. Computers & Electrical
"Thalia: semantic search engine for biomedical              Engineering, 72, 14-25.
abstracts." Bioinformatics 35.10 (2019): 1799-1801.         [10] Bhavithra, J., and A. Saradha. "Personalized web
[2] Xie, Xianfen, and Binhui Wang. "Web page                page recommendation using case-based clustering and
recommendation via twofold clustering: considering user     weighted association rule mining." Cluster Computing
behavior and topic relation." Neural Computing and          22.3 (2019): 6991-7002.
Applications 29.1 (2018): 235-243.                          [11] Deepak, G., & Santhanavijayan, A. (2020).
[3] Bhavithra, J., & Saradha, A. (2019). Personalized       OntoBstFit: A Best-Fit Occurrence Estimation strategy
web page recommendation using case-based clustering         for RDF driven faceted semantic search. Computer
and weighted association rule mining. Cluster               Communications, 160, 284-298.
Computing, 22(3), 6991-7002                                 [12] Deepak, Gerard, J. Sheeba Priyadarshini, and MS
[4] Singh, H., Kaur, M., & Kaur, P. (2017). Web page        Hareesh Babu. "A differential semantic algorithm for
recommendation system based on partially ordered            query relevant web page recommendation." 2016 IEEE
sequential rules. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems,   International Conference on Advances in Computer,
32(4), 3009-3015.                                           ICACA, Coimbatore, India.
[5] Katarya, Rahul, and Om Prakash Verma. "An               [13] ElShaweesh O, Hussain FK, Lu H, Al-Hassan M,
effective web page recommender system with fuzzy c-         Kharazmi S. Personalized Web Search Based on
mean clustering." Multimedia Tools and Applications         Ontological User Profile in Transportation Domain.
76.20 (2017): 21481-21496.                                  InInternational Conference on Neural Information
[6] Ali, F., Khan, P., Riaz, K., Kwak, D., Abuhmed, T.,     Processing 2017 Nov 14 (pp. 239-248). Springer, Cham.
Park, D., & Kwak, K. S. (2017). A fuzzy ontology and        [14] Sumathi G, Akilandeswari J. Improved fuzzy
SVM–based Web content classification system. IEEE           weighted‐iterative association rule-based ontology
Access, 5, 25781-25797.                                     postprocessing in data mining for query recommendation
[7] Thanapalasingam T, Osborne F, Birukou A, Motta E.       applications.    Computational      Intelligence. 2020
Ontology-based recommendation of editorial products.        May;36(2):773-82.
InInternational Semantic Web Conference 2018 Oct 8          [15]Al-Hassan, Malak, and Sadegh Kharazmi.
(pp. 341-358). Springer, Cham.
                                                            "Personalized Web Search Based on Ontological User
[8] Deepak, G., Ahmed, A., & Skanda, B. (2019). An
intelligent inventive system for personalised webpage       Profile in Transportation Domain." In Neural
recommendation based on ontology semantics. In the          Information Processing: 24th International Conference,
International     Journal     of    Intelligent  Systems    ICONIP 2017, Guangzhou.,China, November14–18, 20
Technologies and Applications, 18(1-2), 115-132.            p. 239, Proceedings by Springer, 2017.




                                                                                                                 8