Today's digital society is developing rapidly and the number of smart and innovative digital services is increasing every day. However, the rapid digitalization may also lead to the exclusion of some groups. Senior citizens are one of these groups at risk. The most common way of combating digital exclusion among seniors is to offer education and hands-on training. The short term effects of such education initiatives have shown positive results but the long term lasting effects of digital training have not been explored to any greater extent. Data was collected via semi structured interviews with seniors who had previously participated in training sessions targeting Swedish seniors with a desire to become more digital. The results show that although the immediate effect of participating in training is positive, more individualized training is needed to achieve a lasting effect. Acknowledgement: The authors wish to thank Telia Company, Grums Kommun, and Haninge Kommun. This work was supported in part by a grant from Västra Götalandsregionen.
For a long period of time, the e-government research agenda has been heavily influenced by the
services). One major determinant for e-service uptake is digital exclusion. In short, digital exclusion
may be about one out of two things, or a combination of both: 1) limited access to digital technology
and a working digital infrastructure, e.g. access to digital devices and the internet; 2) limited abilities
to use the internet and digital equipment in order to access digital service, such as services provided
by public agencies to its citizens
It can be concluded that increased uptake of e-services in combination with reduced digital
exclusion may bring a number of potential benefits for senior citizens, such as reduction of social
isolation, IT-supported communication with friends and family, active participation in an
increasingly digitalized healthcare system, and prolonged independence and improved cognitive
abilities
In order to be able to explore the long-effects of seniors' digital behavior we adopted a qualitative
interpretive approach
services used before and after participating in the educational program. ii) iii) more digitally independent.
targeting reduced digital exclusion among seniors.
In total, we interviewed 35 respondents. The interviews were held by telephone due to geographical distances. Each interview was first recorded and then transcribed before being analysed. All respondents were seniors (i.e. 65 or older) and had previously participated in an educational program arranged jointly between Swedish municipalities and Telia Sweden AB1. The educational program was constituted by a three-hour training session and was directed exclusively towards senior citizens who had an interest in becoming more digital. During the training session, the participants were distributed over a set of tables. Each table had computers, a supervisor employed by the current municipality, and high school students who acted in the role of digital natives. The basic idea was to enable the younger generation to learn seniors about digital technologies and services and they did so in response to what questions the seniors might have. The questions ranged from how to use Google and internet in general to specific needs such as starting an e-mail or Facebook account, as well as how to stream TV-series and participate in an internet auction. The interviews were conducted approximately two months after the training session, thus enabling the respondents to reflect upon what they learned during the training session as well as how their daily life had been affected in terms of using digital technology and services if compared to before partaking in the training session.
Based on the three themes that served as a basis for the interviews, we grouped the results accordingly. 3.1.
Most respondents point out that their digital habits have not been changed to any greater extent, at least not to the degree that they themselves considered relevant enough to address during the interviews. Instead, the respondents experienced that participation in the training session did not add much new knowledge that they previously were unaware of. However, they stated that they often had picked up something, but they could not say exactly what it was and they did not experience any major change in their digital habits after participating. Most of these respondents 1 Telia Sweden AB is Sweden's largest telecom operator. Telia AB sells connections in fixed telephony, data communications, Internet, digital TV, IP telephony and mobile telephony to private individuals, companies and organizations. exhibited a basic pre-knowledge of digital technology. They, therefore, felt that the knowledge level on which the training session was targeting was a bit too low and general. According to these respondents, it would have been more effective if more participants which a similar competence profile would have been grouped together instead of being randomly distributed together with others with a wide range of basic digital competence. We use the following quotes as illustrating
I thought I would get more deep insights Maybe I learned something but not that much, I had a pretty good idea from the beginning know already
However, some exceptions were found where changed digital habits were exhibited, not at least concerning a reduced fear and anxiety of using digital technology, as the following quotes indicate: more knowledge and I dare more when these young people [the digital natives educating the seniors] show how it works can be interpreted out of the latter quotation, the social aspects of the training session were important and the personal contact with the young digital natives along with practical training seem to be important drivers for the increased interest in using digital technology, even if the digital habits were not changed to any greater extent.
Given the sparse exhibited changes in digital habits, surprisingly many of the respondents stated that they considered the training session as successful in preventing digital exclusion. The result can be seen as contradictory as the majority of the same respondents had previously claimed that their habits had not changed significantly. How, then, can they claim that the training session was actually rewarding and had succeeded with its original goal of reducing participants' digital exclusion whereas any substantial changes in digital behavior were missing for most respondents? Although the outcome of the training session was not necessarily rewarding for the individual respondents, they found that the occasion itself was generally very rewarding for the other participants at the training session. It seems that the training session managed to succeeded in including practical training and social contacts, both between educators and other participants, in a satisfactory way, as
You got to test things and then do it yourself so to speak, practically, otherwise it is difficult to learn such things. Just watching when someone else does, you don't really learn that at my age anyway We [the seniors] are a group that has not grown up with digital services in the same way as young people today. So mixing high school youth and senior citizens was a very nice way to go
A general observation is that interest in participating in further training initiatives seems to some extent depend on skills since before and after the training. Those who already perceived themselves as knowledgeable do not see further training as equally relevant for themselves but at the same time they consider the training session as a good initiative for seniors who have had a hard time adjusting to the digital society. One respondent who was experienced and comfortable in using digital technology and services already before entering the training session pointed out that the training session was, according to the respondent, very instructive for the more troubled and uncertain participants who had limited previous experiences This digitalization of the society has really gone too fast for the older generation, I myself belong to the older generation. I am 83 years old this year and there are many in my generation who have no opportunities whatsoever to use it [digital] and who are not able to learn it either, and then society must still take these people into account. You can't just ignore them and say that some areas". It is clear that those respondents who rate themselves on the lower side of the competence scale are in need of training initiatives in order to become more independent and selfconfident. Further education initiatives are needed in order to stimulate continuous and long-term competence development of seniors which in turn will enhance the possibilities for substantial chan participants to ask more specific and advanced questions based on their new insights in digital technologies, which was also something that many of the respondents themselves raised during the interviews. One of the respondents was convinced that there was still a lot to learn and was positive Yes, absolutely [about participating in further training sessions]. I am absolutely convinced that I use an incredibly small part of my phone and everything that it does. At my age you have to take a little at a time, so I would very much like to take another step 3.3.
The Respondents' Recommendations for Future Training Initiatives order to promote enhanced digital habits, the respondents had several suggestions. Despite the lack of substantial changes in digital habits, a clear majority of the respondents had a positive attitude towards the training session itself and would be recommending future opportunities to needy acquaintances. Those respondents who did not choose to recommend the training session considered that all the acquaintances they knew were already sufficiently knowledgeable in the subject and that the opportunity would therefore not be rewarding for them. However, although the training initiative as such was well received by the respondents, they had a number of suggestions and recommendations for any potential upcoming training opportunities. One of the most soughtafter changes to emerging opportunities was to reduce the number of participants per group/table and potentially base these smaller groups/tables on the participants' level of knowledge. When the groupings within the training session in which the respondents had participated did not take into account the different knowledge levels of the participants, frustrations arose within the groups, which was most often reflected in the questions asked by the group members. Questions asked by one group member did not necessarily have to be relevant to the other group members and what they wanted to address. This, together with the limited time available, led to a number of different Well you might try to have less people at each table so that each participant got a little more time to ask questions. We were three participants around the t
The main results point out that the training initiative as such was rewarding and informative, but
during the time (two months) between the training session and the interview, just a few of the
respondents exhibit any changes in terms of digital behavior. This indicates that the training session
initially succeeded in educating its participants while failing to influence them in a long-term
into the training sessions is of importance. Either the initial competence among the participants has
been so low that the training session did not help to raise the digital competence enough to bring a
lasting change in digital behavior or otherwise the digital competence has been too high which has
limited the opportunity to gain any new insights for the participants. As such, we can conclude that
the results obtained in this paper partially contradicts with the results obtained by
In addition, we have found concrete suggestions for how to re-design the current training
sessions as well as how municipalities should plan ahead in future education initiatives. Among the
respondents it seems clear that the current version of the training session in which all respondents
have participated could be easily improved in order to enhance the learning curve for all
participants. Adjustments such as smaller groups of participants who have the same basic digital
competence are commonly mentioned suggestions for improvement. Moreover, it is clear that one
single training session is far from enough for most seniors, in particular those who have an absent
or very limited digital competence. It is important that the municipalities arranging training sessions
are aware of and plan ahead how further training sessions should be conducted. Instead of arranging
one lavishly large intervention aimed for everyone, municipalities should prepare training
programs based on the needs of the recipients of such initiatives. As pointed out by several
researchers, fear and anxiety when using digital technology is a major barrier for senior citizens with
limited digital experience
Jesper Holgersson Jesper Holgersson, PhD, is a Senior Lecturer in Information Systems at the Department of Information Technology at University of Skövde, Sweden. His research interests are primarily focused on user centeredness in systems development, particularly in public sector digitalization.
Max Ellgren