<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Stakeholder Involvement in City Transformation: Towards a Smart Old Town</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ulrika Lundh Snis</string-name>
          <email>ulrika.snis@hv.se</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Irene Bernhard</string-name>
          <email>irene.bernhard@hv.se</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Anna Karin Olsson</string-name>
          <email>karin.olsson@hv.se</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University West, School of Business Economics and IT</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>461 86 TROLLHÄTTAN</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="SE">SWEDEN</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>347</fpage>
      <lpage>350</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The ongoing digitalization of society is of increasing importance for city transformation and a driving force for cities to become smart. The aim of this study is to explore stakeholder h innovative implications based on stakeholder involvement and governance. An interpretative single case study with qualitative interviews was conducted in an old town district in a Norwegian city. The results reveal that in order to transform a city with cultural heritage into a smart city requires efforts that go beyond smart ICT implementations. We argue for collaborative governance based on an open and coordinated involvement of stakeholders.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Smart city</kwd>
        <kwd>stakeholder involvement</kwd>
        <kwd>governance</kwd>
        <kwd>city transformation</kwd>
        <kwd>cultural heritage</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction and Research Design</title>
      <p>
        Contemporary cities are facing complex challenges to become smart. Governments and public sector
organizations are gradually transforming due to networked digital technologies and the emerging
Anthopoulos, 2015; Bernhard, 2014). The ongoing digitalization of society embraces dimensions of
integration, equality, citizen needs, sustainability and quality of life that are of increasing importance
for city transformation and governance. The smart city concept includes hence more than
information and communication technology (ICT) since the involvement of stakeholders and
bottom-up driven ideas are in focus (Anthopoulos, 2015; Aranguren et al, 2010). Smart cities are
frequently about improvement and efficiency in public administration and in development of
businesses, society and culture in the urban environment, focusing on creativity and sustainability
while fostering human, social and relational capital (Caragliu et al, 2011; Axelsson &amp; Granath, 2018;
Josefsson &amp; Steinthorsson, 2020). More and more emphasis is being put on developing innovative
solutions to societal challenges through open and inclusive innovation processes, compared with
the previously dominant focus on expert-driven innovation
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2">(Lindberg et al, 2015; Agbali et al, 2019)</xref>
        .
One important and unique resource in city transformation is the local cultural heritage (Al-hagla,
2010). When cultural heritage meets innovation processes and ICT several complex issues evolve
and the need for transparent innovation processes are required combined with stakeholder
involvement (cf. Axelsson &amp; Granath, 2018; Angelidou et al, 2017; Koukopoulos et al, 2017).
      </p>
      <p>
        The aim of this paper is to explore stakeholder challenges in becoming a smart old town and to
contribute with innovative implications based on stakeholder involvement. The following research
questions are addressed: What are the stakeholder challenges in transformation of an old town
district? How can the transformation into a smart old town be governed in order to enhance
stakeholder involvement? An interpretative single case study approach with qualitative interviews
was applied
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">(Walsham, 2006)</xref>
        . The case was "),
originated from the 17th century with 100,000 vistors a year and it is also a living area for 340 local
citizens. The data includes 18 one-hour semi-structured on-site interviews with a total of 21
respondents (a mix of tradesmen, citizens, property owners, craftsmen, nonprofit associations,
educational institutions, local government and municipal organizations, as well as local elected
officials). The interviews were recorded and transcribed and analyzed according to the themes of
the interview guide.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Findings and Conclusions - Towards a Smart Old Town</title>
      <p>The study is positioned as unique in terms of its complex nature of transforming an old town to
become a smart old town based on an open and coordinated involvement of stakeholders. Local
citizens emphazised that the Old Town should not merely be seen as a picturesque scenery backdrop
but as a real living city. Other respondents representing businesses expressed a wish to preserve the
past, the cultural heritage, by using it in the present time. A particular challenge concerned the
unclear governance of the city transformation as it was not fully discussed, communicated,
negotiated or anchored among stakeholders nor related to the municipality. Respondents clearly
state that there is lack of governance and communication and they wish to be included and suggest
doing this step-by-step to build community involvement and trust. Communication and
collaboration was fragmented among those who produce, use and intermediate the Old Town due
to the fact that the information rarely reaches beyond its own grouping. There is no common
communication channel covering all stakeholders. There was an obvious need for an inclusive
innovation process, as a holistic local community design process that develops visions, strategies
and action plans related to the specific city. It was necessary to clarify and formalize the process of
decision-making as well as to follow the contemporary digital development of society by upgrading
skills of digital communication and use of open data in order to become a smart city.</p>
      <p>The study brings forward the opportunities that lies in the dynamics of interaction between the
spirit of cultural heritage and the body of governance that go beyond ICT implementations. The city
transformation process needs to take point of departure from the uniqueness of the city's resources
and the elements of place, citizens, technologies, businesses and visitors need to be balanced since
they are mutually dependent. An organizing body including a communication platform that
coordinates and governs activities and flows of information is needed. Given that smart city is not
only about advanced ICT implementation the findings contribute with vital challenges that need to
be considered in order to become a smart old town. Smart city implementations have wide-ranging
societal implications that require further studies.</p>
      <p>Al-hagla, K. S. (2010). Sustainable urban development in historical areas using the tourist trail approach: A
case study of the Cultural Heritage and Urban Development (CHUD) project in Saida, Lebanon. Cities,
27(4), 234-248.</p>
      <p>Angelidou, M., Karachaliou, E., Angelidou, T., &amp; Stylianidis, E. (2017). Cultural heritage in smart city
environments. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing &amp; Spatial Information
Sciences 42,
Anthopoulos, L. G. (2015). Understanding the smart city domain: A literature review.Transforming city
governments for successful smart cities (pp. 9 21). Cham: Springer.</p>
      <p>Aranguren, M. J., Larrea, M., &amp; Wilson, J. (2010). Learning from the local: Governance of networks for
innovation in the Basque Country. European Planning Studies, 18(1), 47-65.</p>
      <p>Axelsson, K., &amp; Granath, M. (2018). Stakeholders' stake and relation to smartness in smart city development:</p>
      <p>Insights from a Swedish city planning project. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 693-702.
Bernhard, I. (2014). E-government and e-governance. Local implementation of E-government Policies in</p>
      <p>Sweden, Doctoral thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.</p>
      <p>Caragliu A., Del Bo, C., &amp; Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology 18(2), 65
82.</p>
      <p>Josefsson, M. Y. &amp; Steinthorsson, S. R. (2020) Reflections on a SMART urban ecosystem in a small island
state: The case of SMART Reykjavik, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, in
press.</p>
      <p>Koukopoulos, Z., Koukopoulos, D., &amp; Jung, J. J. (2017). A trustworthy multimedia participatory platform for
cultural heritage management in smart city environments. Multimedia Tools and Applications 76(24),
25943-25981.
About the Authors
Ulrika Lundh Snis
Dr Ulrika Lundh Snis is Professor in informatics and Work-integrated learning at University West, School of
Business, Economics and IT in Sweden. Recent publications cover research on competence and learning in
relation to digital transformation in both public and private organizations.</p>
      <p>Dr. Irene Bernhard is Assistant Professor in informatics at University West, School of Business Economics and
IT, Sweden. She has published more than 40 articles and book chapters. Recent publications cover issues
within digital diversity, digitalization and citizen satisfaction, e-government, social media, innovation,
work-integrated learning, and women entrepreneurs.</p>
      <p>Anna Karin Olsson</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Agbali</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Trillo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ibrahim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Arayici</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fernando</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Are smart innovation ecosystems implementation</article-title>
          .
          <source>Smart Cities</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>307</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>327</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lindberg</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ericson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Å.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gelter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karlberg</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Social Change through Place Innovation</article-title>
          .
          <source>Design Research Journal, (1)</source>
          ,
          <fpage>9</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>13</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schaffers</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Komninos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pallot</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Trousse</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nilsson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oliveira</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In The future internet assembly</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>431</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>446</lpage>
          ). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Walsham. G</surname>
          </string-name>
          , (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Doing interpretive research</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Journal of Information Systems</source>
          ,
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>320</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>330</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>