<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Quality in Use -Issues and proposal-</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nowky Hirasawa</string-name>
          <email>hirasawa@ouc-ux.org</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Noriko Wada Meditrina</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Yamanashi</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="JP">Japan</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Otaru University of Commerce Otaru</institution>
          ,
          <country country="JP">Japan</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project Tokyo</institution>
          ,
          <country country="JP">Japan</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>-In ISO/IEC 25010, Quality in Use is mainly focused to the use of operators who interact with product and system directly. However, as workstyle using ICT (Information Communication Technology) has been changed, object of quality in use are also changed to not only direct users with simple direct interaction but also many stakeholders and society which are influence on indirectly by someone use the product, system and service. This paper proposes a Quality in Use model which corresponds to stakeholder needs. As for stakeholder, we classified four groups, that is -Operator of system and/or software, -Organization which has responsibility for system and/or software management, -Customer using system and/or software, -Society which exists system and/or software. As for stakeholder needs, we prepare “usefulness”, “managerial stability”, dependability” and “Acceptability”. To show the relationship among them, we proposed a new Quality in Use model. (Abstract) Figure 2. Proposal model of Quality in Use[4]</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>- usability</kwd>
        <kwd>software engineer</kwd>
        <kwd>quality in use (key words)</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>
        Importance of usability has been considered in not only
ergonomics area but also software engineering area[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
Quality model in SQuaRE (System and software Quality
Requirement and Evaluation) series which are dealt with in
ISO/IEC JTC1SC7 defined effectiveness, efficiency,
satisfaction freedom from risk and context coverage as
elements of “Quality in Use”[2]. Figure 1 shows the Quality
in Use model defined in ISO/IEC 25010.
      </p>
      <p>
        In this figure, three quality characteristics (effectiveness,
efficiency, satisfaction) are same as usability elements defined
in ergonomics standard ISO 9241-11: 2018[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">3</xref>
        ]. About
freedom from risk and context coverage, though influence on
economy and health is described in the definition, there is no
concrete contents. From this, context of use is mainly focused
on interaction directly.
      </p>
      <p>Recently, as workstyle using ICT (Information
Communication Technology) has been changed, object of
quality in use shall be not only simple direct interaction but
also many stakeholders and society which are influence on
indirectly by someone use the product, system and service.
That is, ICT users are not only direct users who interacts
system and product directly but also indirect user who use
output obtained by using ICT.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>FUTURE QUALITY IN USE CONCEPT</title>
      <p>
        Direct user means a user who interacts with product, system
or service directly. For example, ATM users in banking
system, customers for electric commerce system. On the other
hand, there are the other kinds of users, they are indirect users
of other stakeholders. They usually use an output of products
or system. For example, in case of self-driving car (level four
or low), a driver is one of direct user and operators of traffic
infrastructure are kinds of secondary user. As for pedestrians,
they are indirect users. Figure 2 shows the proposal concept
of quality in use include other stakeholders[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>III.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>PROPOSAL OF QUALITY IN USE</title>
      <p>As system and software products are widely used in our
life, use of them is influence on not only their direct uses but
also organizations and society.</p>
      <p>It is responsibility for society of the manufacturer to be
controllable these influence as much as possible.</p>
      <p>
        From this, quality is regarded influence on stakeholders
by using. The purpose of quality in use is that manufacturers
and managers are able to enforce to “use” for improvement
of quality by measuring and evaluating.[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">5</xref>
        ]
      </p>
      <p>The objectives which are influenced by use of system
and software in not only their direct users but also indirect
users included various kinds of stakeholders. Contents of
influence (quality characteristics) are different by the
difference of objects. From this, we classify these objects
into four groups shown below and quality in use model for
each group is defined.</p>
      <p>-Operator of system and/or software
-Organization which has responsibility for system and/or
software management
-Customer using system and/or software
-Society which exists system and/or software</p>
      <p>The reason why groups are four is to be able to explain
almost situation by these four groups, i.e. stakeholders.</p>
      <p>When “quality in Use” is considered, it is necessary to
clarify which group is focused because quality models for
use of system and product are different by the difference of
objects described above.</p>
      <p>In this paper, “Quality in Use” is defined as follows:
Quality in Use is that degree to the system satisfied the
stakeholder needs related to use when operator uses the
system and software.</p>
      <p>Figure 3 show the quality in use models for four groups.</p>
      <p>In this figure, each box about quality in use, that is,
“quality in use for responsible organization, people”,
“quality in use for operators”, “quality in use for customers”
and “quality in use for society” is object group of quality in
use, respectively. Below four boxes describes influence by
use.</p>
      <p>In this, “quality in use for operators” is correspond to the
original quality in use model. As this model mainly focuses
on direct user, we consider that elements of usability defined
in ISO9241-11:2018 should be adopted as quality
characteristics in this model. Quality characteristics for the
other three objects shall be defined by terms which
represented each influence suitably.</p>
      <p>In ISO/IEC25010, the quality of a system is defined that
the degree to which the system satisfies the stated and implied
needs of its various stakeholders, and thus provides value.
Refer to figure 2., stakeholder needs for quality in use can be
divided following four items; they are “usefulness”,
“managerial stability”, dependability” and “Acceptability”.
The relationship between stakeholders and stakeholder needs
are shown in figure 4. This figure is proposed quality in use
model.
IV.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>FUTURE THEME Currently, we prepare some example to proposed quality in use model. Applying these examples to this model, we will verify the validity of this model. Pp4</title>
      <p>[2] ISO/IEC 25010: Systems and software engineering -Systems and
software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) — System
and software quality, 2011</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fukuzumi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hirasawa</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wada</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Komiyama</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and Azuma:,
          <string-name>
            <surname>T.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Proposal of Quality in Use in software Quality, Human-cimputer Interaction design and user experience</article-title>
          ,
          <fpage>pp431</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>438</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <fpage>ISO9241</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>11</lpage>
          :
          <article-title>Ergonomics of human-system interaction -Part11: Usability for definition and concept (</article-title>
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fukuzumi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hirasawa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Nowky: Usability in software development process -Proposal of society.stakeholder centered design , IWESQ2019</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tanikawa</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Suzuki</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kato</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fukuzumi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. :</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Problems in Usability Improvement Activity by Software Engineers - Consideration through verification experiments for human-centered design process support environment; HCI International 2014</article-title>
          Proceedings Vol.
          <volume>12</volume>
          LNCS8521, pp.
          <fpage>641</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>651</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>