<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Development of Russian Youth Digital Citizenship: How to Analyze and Tackle the Internet Communication Risks</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Moscow Pedagogical State University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Moscow 119991</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Tula State University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Tula 300600</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>0000</fpage>
      <lpage>0001</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The paper is focused on the communication safety of children and young people in the social media space as a condition of Youth digital citizenship development. The authors presents the results of an intellectual search for the analysis of the most common risks of Internet communication faced by Russian children, or teachers and counselors working with children. The research design includes discourse-analysis of the social media posts reflecting the most relevant Internet risks, automated social media analysis with the special tool software for new media monitoring (IQBuzz) and eye-tracking for destructive online content neurovisual reaction measuring (kind of neurovisual modeling of the Internet-content perception). The article covers the algorithm of tackling the Internet risks: 1) defining of the Internet risks markers; 2) identifying of the Internet risks triggers; 3) developing of recommendations for teachers and counselors to minimize Internet risks for children and young people. The prospect of the research could be the social graph analysis oriented to the identification of the destructive online group connections' density, destructive opinion leaders' techniques and features of the asocial users” activities. The final product is the measures to maximize the opportunities that open up in the digital environment for Youth: social project activities, civic activism, and digital democracy.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>First Keyword</kwd>
        <kwd>Digital Citizenship</kwd>
        <kwd>Youth</kwd>
        <kwd>Teenagers</kwd>
        <kwd>Social Media</kwd>
        <kwd>Social Media Monitoring</kwd>
        <kwd>Internet Communication Risks</kwd>
        <kwd>Digital Markers of Internet Risks</kwd>
        <kwd>Internet Risks Triggers</kwd>
        <kwd>Neurovisual Techniques to Counter Destructive Network Communities</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Russia, like most countries with national Internet audiences exceeding two thirds of
the total population, links further social, economic and political development with
digitalization. The country has grown a new generation of "digital citizens" who have
reached adulthood, the socialization of which was carried out including through
Internet communication. At the same time, Internet risks faced by Russian children,
adolescents and youth are a significant obstacle to the development of a culture of digital</p>
      <p>Copyright ©2020 for this paper by its authors.</p>
      <p>Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
citizenship. In Russia, there is still no educational program aimed at creating a culture
of "digital citizenship", approved at the state level.</p>
      <p>
        According to the founder of the concept of digital citizenship, K. Mossberger, this
definition is understood as the ability of individuals to participate in society, to fulfill
their civic responsibilities in the course of network communication [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. In the
framework of the concept of digital citizenship, a number of authors focused on
methodological issues of preparing and adapting citizens to life in a digital environment. For
example, M. Ribble defines digital citizenship as the norm for appropriate,
responsible behavior regarding the use of technology [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. He offers an authoring
methodology for teaching digital citizenship in order to help students become productive and
responsible users of digital technologies. In turn, L. Jones and C. Mitchell emphasize
educational technologies for achieving the quality state of digital citizenship of
youth [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. K. Mattson focuses on the beneficial aspects of digital youth citizenship
programs [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. Researchers such as W. Bennett, C Wells and A. Rank explore the
possibilities of civic education in online and offline environments [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. D. Ohler proposes
to redefine the roles of citizens in the modern globally connected infosphere and
proposes the adoption of a comprehensive “roadmap” for moving towards citizenship in
the 21st century based on demanded digital competencies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The problem of Internet communication risks impact on the children and young
people socialization begins to draw the researcher’s attention. It should be recognized
that foreign researchers slightly earlier than in Russia began to study it. The impact of
online risks on children, protection from them and prevention is considered by John
Brown [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] The research of European scientists in the field of Internet safety of young
media users within the framework of the pan-European project "EU Kids Online" and
the national project "British Children on the Internet" (UK Children Go Online) under
Professor S. Livingstone [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. For example, the study found that users with higher
levels of digital competence face more online risks than their less convergent peers
Studies of cyberbullying by R.M. Kowalski [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] are quite influential, which provide a
methodology for measuring this Internet risk and measures to prevent it. Important for
this work are T. Milosevic 's research [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] on studying the actions of social networks,
including Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat and Instagram, to overcome the problem of
cyber intimidation by young users. Pamela Whitby 's work [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] informs parents what
their child will face online. This practical guide shows that children can be protected
from the dangers of the Internet, from the risks of chat and games with family rules.
1
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Research methodology</title>
      <p>The methodology of social-media flows analysis presenting digital markers of
Internet risks data for schoolchildren involved implementation of the following research
procedures algorithm:</p>
      <p>1. Justification of groups’ selection in social media as objects of qualitative
analysis of message content. The logic of the applied target selection is in the formation of
a selective set of online communities containing dialogues of participants about
Internet risks. Research cases were made by such risky situations as cyberbullying, school
shooting, and suicide pushing. For each of these risk types, 20 online communities
have been selected, and 1800 documents have been analyzed. The result of
understanding the content perception of relevant social-media groups was a dictionary of
digital markers - requests for automated accumulation of relevant information flows.</p>
      <p>2. Discourse analysis of unloaded social-media messages of the primary amount,
used to refine search queries and compile final dictionaries of search queries. To
identify the "purity" (relevance) of messages accumulated in the preliminary array, a
systematic sample was used (step - 10), a total of 1500 messages were analyzed (500 in
each of the three arrays).</p>
      <p>3. Automated upload of Internet content using created marker dictionaries and
online service for monitoring social media IQBuzz, a total of 953,000 messages have
been uploaded (together for all types of streams about Internet risks), depth of
accumulation 2016 - 2018.</p>
      <p>4. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of downloaded Internet content was carried
out using automatically generated statistical reports on technological, content and
dynamic characteristics of information flows. The interpretation was performed
according to the criteria specified by the program:
- Weight of information flows;
- Dynamics of information flows;
- Tag clouds - semantic core of information flows;
- Publication activity and user audience of opinion leaders;
- Distribution of information streams by gender and age of the user audience.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Research results</title>
      <p>Cyberbullying/Harassment on the Internet. Cyberbullying is understood by the
authors as a systematic and targeted negative online impact on the social and media user
for the purpose of causing psychological trauma and/or introducing depression.</p>
      <p>Markers - the basis for selecting accounts as units of analysis for the research case
"cyberbullying":
- a small number of friends on social media;
- discriminatory Internet content on friends pages;
- the prevalence of negative comments on the posted information;
- when discussing events/actions - transition to personality assessment;
- labelling and the use of insults;
- personality depreciation/reduction to any disadvantage.</p>
      <p>In the course of information flows unloading implementation where digital markers
of cyberbullying were reflected, the following search queries were used: (sample of
the digital markers, translated to the English): "bulling&amp;in&amp;school", “cyberbulling”,
"victim&amp;bulling", "harm&amp;in&amp;school" “teacher&amp; bulling”, "Internet&amp;bulling"1.
1 Original markers in Russian: "буллинг&amp;в&amp;школе", "школьная&amp;травля"
"школьный&amp;буллинг", “кибербуллинг”, "жертва&amp;буллинга", “жертва&amp;буллинг
"унижение&amp;в&amp;школе" "коллективная&amp;травля" учитель&amp; буллинг”, “учитель&amp;травля”,
"групповая&amp;травля" "интернет&amp;травля" "оскорбления*{1}школ%",
"оскорбле</p>
      <p>Total number of social-media documents accumulated according to these digital
markers - 280,000, source of unloading - blogochosting "Vkontakte," depth of
unloading - period from 1.01.2017 to 10 October 2018.</p>
      <p>Fig. 1. Dynamics of information flows on cyberbullying in social media in the period
from 26 Febr. 2018 to 22 Oct. 2018
The dynamic characteristics of the resulting arrays of relevant documents are shown
in Figure 1. According to these data, a remarkable intensification of the analyzed flow
occurred at the end of February - the beginning of March 2018, and the maximum
extremum is at the end of September 2018. These peaks have substantial intersections
with offline events concerning cyberbullying. At the beginning of this spring there
was an active discussion in traditional and new media of the intensive growth of
network groups with a destructive focus: pushing to harm health and life, immoral and
criminal social actions. It was during this period that the number of reports attempting
to make sense of the factors, causes, triggers of cyberbullying, and ways to prevent
and counter this type of Internet risk increased dramatically. At the end of September
2018, the surge in reports of cyberbullying could be explained by the indirect impact
of the Kerch tragedy, which significantly affected social media content, including
information flows about cyberbullying.</p>
      <p>The gender ratio of the identified authors of the uploaded social and media
documents indicates the de facto parity representation of masculine and famine groups
among the user audience of the cyberbullying streams (see Figure 2).
ния*{1}одноклассн%", (травля|травить)&amp;-( соба%|хим%|орган%), "дразнят&amp;в&amp;школе",
"обзывают &amp;в&amp;школе"[In Rus.].
This shows the de facto equal chances of young people and girls, men and women
becoming victims of cyberbullying or meeting the problem indirectly through family
members. The age ratio of documents authors, which reflect the problems of
cyberbullying, generally repeats the contours of the most active audience of social media:
users between the ages of 26 and 35 most actively publish documents on
cyberbullying, also rather widely represented in this audience people aged 36-45 years (see
Figure 3). These two age groups obviously represent a commonality of parents concerned
about the risks of cyberbullying to which their children are exposed. A rather small
proportion of users aged 15 and under in the analyzed audience can be explained by
the fact that registration of accounts in social media is possible only from the age of
14. Young people as young as 16- 25 are also quite heavily represented in the
structure of the user audience of streams about cyberbullying, which indicates harassment
in the network as a problem typical for both teenagers and youth age group.
On the one hand, the digital environment becomes a space of harassment, moral
damage and mental damage, while the social and media space provides opportunities to
express the reaction of victims of cyberbullying, as well as to find like-minded and
sympathizers.</p>
      <p>
        There is a complex correlation between the emergence of depression in adolescents
and young people, threatening suicide attempts and involvement in communication
through social media. This connection is expressed in the fact that depressive states
did not end in suicidal actions most often in those members of the younger generation
who had the opportunity to be constantly online, and, on the contrary, removal from
communication in the network as a whole more often caused installation for suicide
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Pushing for suicidal behavior.</p>
      <p>Pushing for suicidal behavior in a network environment as a research case was
interpreted as a targeted psychological influence on the user in order to form a
behavioral setting on committing suicide.</p>
      <p>Markers - the basis for selecting accounts as units of analysis for the research case
"pushing for suicidal behavior":</p>
      <p>- intense and prolonged harassment/exclusion of the account author;
- involvement of the account author in online communities presenting suicide as a
form of game/quest;</p>
      <p>- involvement of the account author in online communities presenting suicide as
freedom/adulthood/choice;
- posting suicidal content on the account.</p>
      <p>The unloading of the social and media stream presenting the digital markers of
suicidal behavior was carried out using the following search queries: (sample of the
digital markers, translated to the English: «Death| (Siniy Kit)| #makesuicide | @kill
yourself || funeral| | {heaven &amp; hell &amp;inferno}2.</p>
      <p>By means of the listed digital markers 102 802 messages of their blog hosting site
VKontakte from March 1, 2016 till November 1, 2018 were accumulated.</p>
      <p>The tags were divided into several semantic groups. The first group includes words
such as "Post," Original, "Text." It is the most numerically represented group of tags,
indicating the perception of suicide reports as unique documents popular in the
environment of social media posts and meaning "Farewell Post" (suicide note) and "The
Original Way to Leave Life." The second group of tags contains the words: "New,"
Life, "Live," Want, "Good," House. " This pool of word usage is semantically close to
such logic: "Suicide is the beginning of a new, good life, it will give a new, good
house." The third group is tags that combine words that indicate a clear order of
action (instruction group): "Place," Need, "Make." Thus, the whole sequence of tags fits
into the scheme: "The original way to leave life, which will provide a new, good life
and find a new and good house."</p>
      <p>Analysis of the names of influential blogs and online groups reflecting
conversations about suicide shows that the most numerically voluminous audience has a block
of priest Vladislav providing spiritual assistance in difficult life situations. The
remaining groups have from hundred to four hundred among their user audience. Group
names are entirely based on the names of their creators and do not carry a serious
semantic load. These groups are not so-called "death groups" that stimulate and
encourage adolescents to commit suicide. Real "death groups" - closed communities,
accounting and unloading of messages of which online service for monitoring social
media does not carry out.</p>
      <p>The socio-demographic analysis of the suicide reports authors indicates the
prevalence of girls among them, users aged 15-17 and most often residents of large cities.</p>
      <p>The dynamics of the social and media flow about suicide, presented in Figure 4,
shows that this flow is unstable, has many peaks of different intensity and falls to
virtually zero. Most of the relevant messages are recorded in the blogochosting
"VKontakte." The peak in March 2016 is due to a case that took control of the Civic
Commission on Human Rights: "On March 23, 2016, the Civil Commission on
Hu2 «Смерть| (синий кит)| #уходиизмира | самоубийство| (покидая мир)| death | смерть|
выход| #откобэйниться| выпилиться| умереть| сдохнуть| @килл | 200| двухсотка|
@килла| #kill | похороны| отпевать| отпевка| самоубийства| покинуть| прыжок| @лобби|
(улететь в лобби) | отчакрыжиться|
Подохнуть| {рай &amp; ад, 3}| #чистилище| прощание | @пз (предсмертная записка) |Ня пока
(ня.пока либо #няпока); Самовыпил (самовыпилиться); f57; вскрыться #депра #жизнелюб
#суи #су #СУ #с/у #сушник #фен» [In Rus.].
man Rights was approached by Andrei Vershinov from the city of Arzamas, who
reported that on March 10, 2016 his aunt Elena Vershinova (both names changed)
committed suicide allegedly after having taken an antidepressant on the appointment
of a psychiatrist" (http://www.cchr.ru/news/464.htm). Although the woman was not in
suicidal groups, a surge in social media activity triggered this due to the active
circulation of reports of this suicide online.
Taking into consideration the fact that messages from closed "death groups" were not
included in the unloading, and the statistics presented in figure 6 (measured in
thousands of documents) reflect only an open online discourse about suicide, it is obvious
that there is a very wide interest in the topic of stimulating suicidal behavior in social
media.</p>
      <p>Distribution of online content of extremist and terrorist content, involvement in
extremist, terrorist activities (school shooting)</p>
      <p>This type of Internet risk is interpreted by the team of authors from the point of
view of mobilizing users through online propaganda of radical, extremist attitudes:
readiness to participate in actions of civil disobedience, terrorist actions. An integral
part of the risk type is school shooting, which can be reduced to motivation in the
network space for the organization of terrorist acts in educational institutions. School
shooting served as a specific case for exploring the process of distributing online
content of extremist and terrorist content.</p>
      <p>Markers - the basis for selecting accounts as units of analysis for the research case
"school shooting."
- posting content on their accounts that discriminates against people/
groups/nations based on their ethnicity and religion;
- subscriptions to online communities that distribute extremist content;
- intensive support of this content through "likes," exchanges, retweets, etc.;
- consciousness of "besieged in the fortress";
- transfer of one person qualities to a group/people/nation;
- having friends who share extremist, nationalist views;
- the instructive nature of the content in the adolescent 's account;
- use of symbols in the account aimed at escalating history;
- development of symbols and application of protest metaphors.</p>
      <p>Accumulation of socio-media flow reflecting school shooting markers was
performed using the following digital markers:</p>
      <p>Filter 1 (columbine) (Vladislav &amp; Roslyakov) &amp; (true &amp; crime &amp; community)
(natural &amp; selection) (natural &amp; selection).</p>
      <p>Filter 2 "blow up the school" "blew up the school" "blow up the school with
everyone inside" "want to kill my classmates" "make something like columbine" "repeat
columbine" "repeat columbine in my school" "make them columbine" "finish my
classmates" "eric harris" "eric haris" "erik harris" "Eric harris and dylan klebold"
"harris and klebold" "harris klebold" ""eric harris cool" "eric harris did well"
"schoolshooting in Kerch] columbine &amp; shooters”.</p>
      <p>With the help of the listed digital markers, 570,000 messages were unloaded in the
Russian-language and English-language segments of social media: "Facebook,"
Vkontakte, "YouTube," Odnoklassniki, "Twitter," Instagram "for the period from
January 8, 2018 to October 22, 2018.</p>
      <p>Figure 5 shows a surge in the intensity of flows about school shooting in social
media in connection with the tragic accident in Kerch in September 2018. An
alarming signal is the fact that the main contexts analysis of this stream messages indicates
attempts to glorify the teenager who carried out this terrorist act and romanticize his
motives.</p>
      <p>Gender analysis of the audience of the studied stream showed that the involvement
in the information flows of "Colombian communities" is more inherent to the male
audience than to the female audience - respectively 64% and 36% - see Figure 6.</p>
      <p>The dominance of the maskulin gender group among the authors of reports of
school shooting shows that, compared to girls, young man are more predisposed to
carry out the devotions under consideration, and are more ready to respond to calls for
asocial actions, which is due to the specific psycho-emotional and
sociopsychological development of this part of adolescents and young people.
Fig. 5. Dynamics of social and media flow reflecting digital traces of school shooting between
January 2018 and October 2018 in blogochosts "Facebook," Vkontakte, "YouTube,
" Odnoklassniki, "Twitter," Instagram"
According to the data of Figure 7, most interested in the subject of school shooting,
are representatives of the younger generation and number more than 8 thousand
authors under 35 years of age. It should be noted that the number of authors under the
age of 25 is only half of the number of speakers (about 4,000 authors). The number of
youngest authors under the age of 16 is only 451. In general, this corresponds to the
portrait of the most active user of social media, as well as the age characteristics of
parents of those teenagers who are in the most sensational for perception of ideas of
school shooting.
Analyzing the publication activity of the most influential network groups associated
with school shooting, note that the largest user audience has a community "Natural
selection," it features 20,027 participants. It is a group that designs and distributes
ideas of necessity of natural selection, rejection of values of humanity and mercy,
realization of the principle "Survives the strongest."</p>
      <p>"The World of Maniacs and Serial Killers" group generally semantically and
discursively repeats the contours of ideas circulated in the "Natural selection"
community, spreading the values of mass murder in order to uphold their principles and
achieve their goals.</p>
      <p>Participants of this network group deny, subvert the importance of morals and
morality in human society. This group has a very wide audience (281,718). In another
rather representative online community - "World of Crimes" - there is a discussion of
various ways of killing people, options for committing crimes. Despite the absence of
explicit calls for school shooting or other crimes in this group, the very fact of active
communication on these topics can serve as a trigger for the formation of the user 's
position on the organization of socially dangerous actions.</p>
      <p>Analysis of the tag cloud typical for the school shooting flow revealed several
semantic word usage groups associated with a particular discussion context. The first
group of words: "crimea 'college' place |" indicates the intense circulation in social
media of reports about the Kerchen episode of school shooting, which literally blew
up the network environment in late September - early October 2018. The second
group of tags: "murder 'life' child |" concerns an indication of the social essence of
school shooting. And the third group of the most common in the analyzed stream of
word usage: "weapons 'explosion' murder |" concerns the technological aspect of the
organization of school shooting.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The semantics of flows about cyberbullying indicate that teenagers with specific
appearance or special behavior are the main target of online harassment. Different,
specificity serves as a basic reason for cyberbullying. In this regard, only helping a
teenager to adopt himself and his characteristics, to master communication competences,
can be a central measure to prevent and overcome the negative consequences of
cyberbullying.</p>
      <p>The semantic core of the stream, which reflects the push towards suicidal behavior,
allows to identify the main techniques applied by the leaders of this stream -
depreciation of human life, gamification in the process of formation of suicidal attitudes of the
user audience and romanticization of suicides. Countering the involvement of
adolescents in suicide networks should include legal measures, as well as mandatory and
regular psychological support for adolescents whose behavior demonstrates markers
of participation in suicidal online communities.</p>
      <p>Linguistic analysis of reports belonging to the flow of school shooting reveals two
main ways to mobilize extremist and terrorist attitudes of teenagers by network
leaders: emotional rationalization of mass killings, involving primacy of motives of
power, administration of educational institution, classmates, as well as glorification of
terrorists; rational reasoning, applying the ideas of the concept of natural selection and
denying the importance of morality and morality to society.</p>
      <p>Significant measures to prevent the involvement of adolescents in online school
shooting communities are their belief in the need to have an opinion, to critically
sense, to reflex from various sides the information coming from the network; discuss
what consciousness manipulation technologies are used in online groups mobilizing
extremism and terrorism, and the benefits that network leaders derive from their
criminal activity.</p>
      <p>It is obvious that in conditions of internment-risks it becomes extremely important
to manage effectively strategies of child behavior by teachers, parents and other
participants of educational environment, to build in children resistance to emerging
internment threats.</p>
      <p>Countering the communication of schoolchildren to destructive network
communities can be organized in the following areas:</p>
      <p>1) demonstration of doubt of such sources of information and malice of their
leaders;
2) proof of inaccuracy, damage, nullity of the destructive information itself;
3) switching the attention of the Internet audience to other information of
constructive content.</p>
      <p>The criteria for selecting the relevant content may be its entertainment (what can
shift attention), logic (what meets common sense) and normative acceptability (what
meets the rules of the reference group). Opposition to such content should consist in
encouraging alternative creative actions through the formation and awakening of
positive meanings, the popularization of acceptable standards of behavior and role
models.</p>
      <p>The effectiveness of countering destructive network communities in all three areas
mentioned above can be facilitated by neuro-visual techniques such as the use of
wellknown warning symbols, the management of discourse by changing attention
concentrator objects, the targeted use of verbal and graphic metaphors. Thus, our eye
tracking studies with the help of eye trackers show that additional mobilization in the
perception of graphic images can be provided by the use of familiar symbol-warnings.
The appearance of a red line on the computer screen for 7-10 seconds in combination
with the inscription of the type "Beyond the line it is impossible!" significantly
reduced the time of respondents to consider high-risk zones and increased the time of
view stay in safe zones. For example, when looking at a person on a computer screen
standing on the edge of a cliff, on the ledge of a high-rise building, on a rock, the time
of sight in places of possible fall after the demonstration of a red line inadvertently
decreased on average more than twice (567 respondents participated in experiments).
At the same time, the time of sight in safe places of such images increased more than
one and a half times.</p>
      <p>With the help of the eye tracker, we have also found multiple manifestations of
changing the nature of information perception by changing attention concentrator
objects. Such a change is easily ensured by increasing the font of one of the verbal
fragments of the visual stimulus, its color, highlighting, features of the design, as well
as by purposeful introduction of such elements. Similarly, they act on the perception
of the proposed content of metaphor drawings (for example, all known "emoji,"
recognizable images of fairy characters, etc.).</p>
      <p>The authors of the article have compiled a list of recommendations for prevention
and counteraction of risks considered in the article for teachers, counselors, specialists
in the field of educational work.</p>
      <p>Recommendations for preventing and combating cyberbullying:
- presence of teachers, counselors, experts in the field of education in global
network;
- monitoring of the teenager accounts and the immediate environment;
- formation of the acceptance and identity culture among children;
- "social producing" and navigation of students and pupils in search of friendly
online communities.</p>
      <p>Recommendations for preventing and combating suicidal behavior in the Internet
environment:</p>
      <p>- direct and immediate designation of teachers and counselors presence at Internet
space;
- operational appeal to management of an electronic resource;
- operational appeal to law enforcement agencies;
- creation of group for friends, relatives, the immediate environment
support/notification about this risk;
- professional psychological maintenance;
- changing activity (after overcoming crisis) on game types of activity (sport,
tourism, quests).</p>
      <p>Recommendations on preventing and combating the dissemination of extremist,
terrorist content and involvement in extremist, terrorist activities (school shooting) on
the Internet:
- an appeal to the necessity of having the personal opinion;
- stimulation of critical thinking development;
- offering alternatives and switching attention to socially useful activity;
- help in reflection of terrorist and extremist content;
- discussion of consciousness manipulation technologies;
- development of the students communication culture on the Internet in school,
installation on immediate informing adults on any threats or alarms connected with
Internet communication.</p>
      <p>Thus, the formation and development of a culture of digital citizenship in Russia is
possible due to the interaction of civil and government structures aimed at creating
conditions to minimize the negative effects of Internet communications and maximize
the opportunities that open up in the digital environment: social project activities,
civic activism, and digital democracy.</p>
      <p>Acknowledgement. The study carried out with the support of the state task budget of Moscow
Pedagogical State University concerning to “All-Russian school counselors”.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bennett</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wells</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rank</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age</article-title>
          .
          <source>Citizenship Studies</source>
          .
          <volume>13</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>105</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>120</lpage>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brown</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.:
          <article-title>Online Risk to Children: Impact, Protection and Prevention, First Edition</article-title>
          . John Wiley &amp; Sons Publ, Ltd. (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jones</surname>
          </string-name>
          , L. M., Mitchell, KJ.
          <article-title>Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship</article-title>
          .
          <source>New Media &amp; Society. 18</source>
          ,
          <fpage>2063</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2079</lpage>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kowalski</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Limber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Agatston Cyberbullying: Bullying in the Digital Age, 2 edition</article-title>
          . Wiley-Blackwell (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Livingstone</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Online risk, harm and vulnerability: Reflections on the evidence base for child Internet safety policy</article-title>
          .
          <source>ZER. Journal of Communication Studies</source>
          .
          <volume>35</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>28</lpage>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mattson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          Digital Citizenship in Action: Empowering Students to Engage in Online Communities.
          <source>International Society for Technology in Education (</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Milosevic</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>T. Protecting Children Online? Cyberbullying Policies of Social Media Companies (Information Society Series) Hardcover - February 2</source>
          . The MIT Press (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mossberger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tolbert</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>McNeal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          : Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation. The MIT Press (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ohler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. Digital</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Community</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Digital</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Citizen</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Corwin</source>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ribble</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Digital Citizenship for Educational Change</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Kappa Delta Pi Record</source>
          .
          <volume>48</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>148</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>151</lpage>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Whitsby</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          : Is Your Child Safe Online?
          <article-title>: A Parent's Guide to the Internet, Facebook, Mobile Phones</article-title>
          &amp;
          <article-title>Other New Media</article-title>
          . White Ladder Press (
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>