<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Tunnel Field Effect Transistor based Biosensors for detection of Biomolecules: A Review</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Rishika Sen</string-name>
          <email>rishikasen666@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Cherry Bhargava</string-name>
          <email>Cherry.Bhargava@lpu.co.in</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>ACI'21: Workshop on Advances in Computational Intelligence at ISIC 2021</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Lovely Professional University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Phagwara, Punjab</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IN">India</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>This manuscript presents brief review on Tunnel Field Effect Transistor based Biosensor from initial phase to currently used Tunnel field Effect Transistors for biosensing application. TFET based Biosensors have gained attention due to phenomenal properties such as high sensitivity, low cost, and ability to detect label-free biomolecules. Conventional Field Effect Transistors have lots of advantages as biosensors in comparison to other biosensors but there exist various limitations on subthreshold swing where (SS&gt;60 mv/decade), various short channel effects reduced the device sensitivity leading to restriction in using it as biosensors. For improving various research is going on so that scientists can find a way out to make a device overcoming all the disadvantages faced by previously developed biosensor made by different transistor devices. This manuscript aims to clearly distinguish between different TFET Biosensors based on their working and sensitivity parameters to provide better insights to the researchers to further carry on the research for making more reliable and advance Biosensors.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>1 Biosensor</kwd>
        <kwd>TFET</kwd>
        <kwd>sensitivity</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>In this emerging world, where science has
made so much progress scientists try hard to
find solutions to every problem. The recent
problem such as COVID pandemic has
disrupted people lives and such problem was
also seen a couple of years ago when smallpox
was introduced therefore these issues are
neverending, Biosensors are the advancement of
technology for such issues giving precise way
to deal with the discovery of biomolecules [1].
Usually, a biosensor consists of two
components: a recognition element (molecular)
known as a receptor and target analytes like
DNA, antibodies, cells, and a transducer to
convert the information into a measurable
quantity.</p>
      <p>
        Biological analytes are hard to detect based
on their intrinsic properties, they need
labels such as enzymes, radioactive molecules
attach with the analyte for detection and it was
a drawback as label-based detection are
expensive and also time-consuming. On the
other hand, label-free detection does not require
labels to facilitate measurements because they
use intrinsic physical properties such as charge,
size, dielectric permittivity, etc to detect the
presence of biomolecules in a cheaper sample
and time- saving. These ideal qualities of
labelfree biosensors spread their applications in
numerous zones like the clinical field for
beginning phase location of biomolecules,
conveyance of medications, food handling,
natural observing, security, and observation. A
Biosensor is a device that produces an electrical
signal from the biophysical response. The
principal chemical-based biosensor was
founded by Clark et al. in 1962 [1]and from that
point forward this arising field has picked up
loads of consideration among overall analysts
for creating precise and more solid biosensors.
The biosensor comprises of two different stages
– 1) Biomolecule location and 2)
Transconduction. The first stage comprising of
biomolecule location is one of the important
tasks as locating a biomolecule in a device
where it could be recognized by the biosensors
helps is detecting the biomolecules in a more
precise manner. The second stage transduction
defines the process that is used to define
biosensors by converting the recognized
biomolecules into an electrical form or readable
form for precise detection. All these biosensors
are utilized to improve human existence. There
are various biosensors based on the
transduction process.
The working principle of electrochemical
biosensor [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">2</xref>
        ] is to experience the adjustment in
the electrical properties of the sensor by
response focused on biomolecules. The noticed
changes are utilized as estimating boundaries
for the sensor and depending on boundary
noticed they are additionally characterized into
amperometric, potentiometric, and
conductometric. The exceptionally
groundbreaking substitute of ordinary insightful sort
biosensor is optical biosensors as it needs
extremely restricted groundwork for the
location of the focused biomolecule. Optical
fields with analyte are utilized in an optical
biosensor to identify tumor cells, poisons, and
so on Calorimetric and Acoustic biosensors
discover great applications for the discovery of
DNA. All these biosensors are utilized to
improve human existence. Thermal and
massbased biosensors are unpredictable and have
low reaction time. Optical and electrochemical
biosensors have taken more consideration for
dependable and precise reactions because of
their low location limit and extremely high
particularity. There is a lot of progress going on
TFET based biosensors but researchers face
lots of problem in finding all the information
related to Tunnel Field Effect Transistor based
biosensors at one time. This manuscript has
been bifurcated into three sections. Section I
elaborates the brief literature review, Section II
describes the structure and performance
comparison of various biosensors, and finally in
Section III conclusion is drawn.
      </p>
      <p>
        Low cost, low power, rapid, small,
ultrasensitive, robust biosensors are highly
recommended for Point of Care Applications.
Biosensor build on Complementary metal oxide
semiconductor compatible silicon nanowire
tunneling field effect transistor (SiNW- TFET)
has been proposed by Anran Gao (2016) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">3</xref>
        ]. It
has been observed that SiNW- TFET provided
good amount of parasitic capacity by using
inherent ambipolar nature through biomarker of
human lung cancer CYFRA21-1 and pH
sensing as unfunctionalized Silicon nanowire
TFET devices can be characterized as hydrogen
ion sensors. Changes in surface charges at the
Silicon nanowire surface gates the Tunnel Field
Effect device that modulates the nanowire
current. The ambipolar nature and conductivity
was shown for both positive and negative
voltages at gate. This ambipolar response
discriminates the electrical noise to carry with
object analysis.
      </p>
      <p>
        Analytical model of p-n-p-n TFET for working
as biosensor for label-free detection of
biomolecules has been developed by Rakhi
Narang (2012) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">4</xref>
        ]. It has been observed that the
proposed model gives two important properties
that is possessed by biomolecules 1) dielectric
constant 2) charge. Comparison with
conventional FET based biosensors was also
made in the terms of sensitivity of TFET based
biosensors consisting of various parameters like
shift in threshold, variation in ON-current (Ion)
level and ON-OFF ratio of current (Ion/Ioff).
Also, it was concluded that TFET based sensors
show wide deviation in current level and
therefore change in ON current (Ion) can be
considered as appropriate parameter for
sensing.
      </p>
      <p>Detection of biomolecules using electrical
characteristics is attractive because
inexpensive, label-free, provide stability and
ease of on-chip fabrication of sensors [5]. TFET
having nanostructures or particularly nanowires
has gained importance because of enough
surface to volume ratio and high electrostatic
control. For biomolecule detection specific
receptor is allowed to get in contact with oxide
or dielectric layer of semiconductor device and
because of their charge, it produces gating
effect on the device thereby changing the
electrical properties like current, subthreshold
voltages, conductance etc. Therefore,
sensitivity is in accordance with gating effect,
higher the response of TFET with gate effect
higher will be the sensitivity of the device .
It has been concluded by Deblina Sarkar and K
Banerjee (2012) [5] that highest response to
gating effects of the biosensors is obtained in
subthreshold region but CFETs (Conventional
Field Effect Transistors) cannot achieve
minimal subthreshold swing that
simultaneously limits the sensitivity and
response.</p>
      <p>Conventional DM-FET based biosensors
showed less sensitivity in comparison to
DMTFET based biosensors but showed low
subthreshold current.</p>
      <p>
        In 2016, Sayan kanungo [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">6</xref>
        ] investigated the
effect of (SiGe) source and n+ pocket doped
channel using extensive device level
simulation. It has been observed that
silicongermanium source DMTFET showed high
superiority in comparison to n+ pocket
Dielectric Modulated TFET to obtain higher
subthreshold current level while maintaining
the sensitivity of device .
      </p>
      <p>In 2019, experimental study has been done by
Cao W [7] that provided good insights into
Subthreshold Swing (SS) characteristics of
TFET by examining effects of four critical
parameters like level of source and doping,
band gap, length, and tunnel effective mass in
the perspectives of Fermi-Dirac Distribution
and Tunneling probability variation. It was
observed that shortening of Fermi Dirac
Distribution, OFF-current and uncovered
intrinsic Subthreshold Swing compete among
themselves to provide minimum achievable
Subthreshold Swing. This work also concluded
that for homo junction TFET design: small
channel length, suitably high doping level of
source and small tunnel effective mass is
suitable and for hetero junction Tunnel Field
Effect Transistor design in these parameters,
small band gap present at tunnel junction is
preferable.</p>
      <p>There are various types of biosensors as been
discussed above and in that row M Waleed
Shinwari (2011) [8] presented the effect of
distribution of DNA probe on reliability of
label-free biosensors. As we have observed that
since the miniaturization for increasing the
sensitivity parameter, there was lack of research
in knowing the variation of received signals
with respect to the position of probes over
sensitive surface therefore a computational
study has been done by them using finite
element model on three dimensional biological
field-effect transistor (BioFET) via Monte
Carlo simulations on the DNA molecules
position. It was also observed that SNR can be
low enough to disturb the device functionality.
Further study done by him was the effects of
region of pinch-off and concentration of
electrolyte on Signal to Noise ratio. It was
concluded that sharing between ions across
probes of DNA specifically at low-electrolyte
concentration significantly increases the
amount of change of charge inversion in FET
thereby increasing the sensitivity. Therefore,
there is a great need of properly controlled
environment for achieving reliability of
biosensors and mostly in miniaturization of
devices.</p>
      <p>In 2010, Jae- Hyuk Ahn et al [9] proposed the
double gate nanowire field effect transistor for
increasing the sensitivity of conventional FET
devices. Gate region was separated as G1
(primary) and G2 (secondary) allowing
independent voltage control for modulating
potential of channel and sensitivity was
enhanced.</p>
      <p>Due to the disadvantages of MOSFETs under
miniaturization research on electronic devices
has been moved to TFETs. Although TFET
devices are suitable but still have few things
that need to be controlled like it has low on
currents that results in low switching speed and
shows ambipolar behaviour. It was observed by
Anne S. Verhulst (2007) [10] that reduction of
gate length leads to several advantages like
increase in switching speed and decrease in
processing complexity.</p>
      <p>Furthermore, short gate TFETs investigation
has been carried to know the capability of
tunnel field effect transistor by simulating low
power digital applications using supply
voltages less than 0.5 V. The study done
showed that tunneling current has very less or
negligible contribution on charging and
discharging gate capacitance of TFETs. It was
also observed that although short gate TFET
has high resistance region but the charging and
discharging speed still meets requirements for
application in low voltages. The performance
analysis was done on SG-TFETs using different
materials like Silicon, Germanium and
heterostructure studying various parameters
such as voltage overshoot, static power, delay
energy consumption etc. It was concluded that
heterostructure Short Gate TFETs can be said
as promising candidate for extending supply
voltages to lower the voltages below 0.5
because of short gate structures, small bandgap
material for source and sufficient driving
current in Tunnel Field Effect Transistors.
In 2018, Deepak Soni et al [11] carried out
research for improving the speed of sensing and
sensitivity of TFET based biosensor using the
concept of formation of plasma. The research
was carried out by adding an electrode on the
source region of conventional biosensors using
negative supply for extending cavity above the
source region. The introduction of additional
Source Electrode with negative supply voltage
forms the cavity over source region overcomes
the issues such as abrupt junction formation at
source junction and channel junction. It was
also observed that issues related to solubility
limit of silicon material was also solved
because of formation of plasma layer of holes
near Silicon and HFO2 interface. It has been
concluded that excess biomolecules in the
region of source and cavity increased the
concentration of plasma layer of holes near
Silicon-HFO2 because of better coupling that in
return improved the capability of sensing and
the sensing speed of Biosensors.</p>
      <p>A transition metal dichalcogenide material
based TFET was proposed by Prabhat Kumar
and Brajesh Kumar (2019) [12] as transition
metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are said to be
promising candidates for sensing applications.
It has been observed that TMDs have
atomically thin-layered structure, dangling
bond free structure and novel physical
properties. The presented device showed
Subthreshold swing of 50mv/ decade and
measured sensitivity of 2.11 for 5mV change in
voltage across gate.</p>
      <p>Label free biosensors is preferable due to
their simple operation. L- shaped TFET [13]
based biosensors are used because of their low
voltage Subthreshold Swing, power
consumption and off state current. In 2020,
Chong C proposed a dielectric modulated
Lshaped TFET where a cavity was formed inside
the electrode of gate in vertical direction. The
cavity is filled with biomolecules for working it
as a biosensor. The simulation was carried out
and was observed that current sensitivity can be
increased as high as 2321, the sensitivity of
threshold voltage could reach 0.4 and
sensitivity of SS could reach 0.7. The results
assured that Dielectric Modulated L-shaped
TFET sensor is good to go for increased
sensitivity and less power consumption.</p>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>In this section Tunnel Field Effect Transistor device structure and their performance in terms of sensitivity for the application as biosensor is described.</title>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-1">
          <title>1. Silicon Nanowire Tunnel Field Effect</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-2">
          <title>Transistor</title>
          <p>
            The silicon nanowire TFET based
biosensors was designed using novel CMOS
compatible anisotropic wet etching approach
and conventional lithography alongwith
tetramethylammonium hydroxide. In Figure 1
(a), one can observe that SiNWs forms a cluster
(10 wires each) that is used as one unit for
sensing specific molecule. The structure clearly
shows that the surface of Silicon nanowires are
smooth and of high quality [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">3</xref>
            ]. The ID-VG
characteristics of SiNW-TFET and
conventional TFET based biosensors in log
scale was compared. It can be observed in
Figure 1 (b) that subthreshold swing of TFET
was decreased in comparison to conventional
FET device (MOSFET).
          </p>
          <p>
            Figure 1 (a): Silicon nanowire-based
Biosensor diagram [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">3</xref>
            ]
          </p>
          <p>
            Figure 1 (b): ID-VG characteristics of Silicon
nanowire-TFET and conventional TFET based
biosensors in log scale [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">3</xref>
            ]
          </p>
          <p>
            Figure 1 (c): ID-VG curve of Silicon nanowire
TFET device for VD = 1 V [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">3</xref>
            ]
          </p>
          <p>In Figure 1 (c), ID-VG curve of Silicon
Nanowire TFET device for VD = 1 V is shown
that justify that this proposed structure has SS
of 37 mv/dec for n-channel that simultaneously
increased the sensitivity. The current and
subthreshold swing (SS) of n-channel relation
shows that subthreshold swing of TFET is not
static like conventional FET and therefore, it is
strongly dependent on gate voltage.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-3">
          <title>2. Dielectrically Modulated Tunnel FET</title>
          <p>based Biosensor.</p>
          <p>
            The Dielectric modulated TFET based
biosensor is basically a Dual gate geometry
pn-p-n architecture. The change of quality in
physio-chemical reaction in analyte is
complicated that fails to detect electrically
neutral biomolecule. The challenges faced by
label-based biosensor is suppressed using label
free detection technique. The p-n-p-n (Tunnel
source MOSFET) was considered shown in
Figure 2 (a) because p-i-n structure have less on
current.
Figure 2 (b): ID-VG characteristics of DM-TFET
[
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">4</xref>
            ]
          </p>
          <p>We can observe ID-VG characteristics in
Figure 2 (b) that shows good response for
different dielectric constant values and
therefore the sensitivity of biosensor is
improved. The thing that was not taken care
was ambipolar conductivity which effect the
sensitivity of the device and limits the
performance of this device. They performed the
sensitivity analysis by considering dielectric
constant and charge separately but if we
observe practically then the charge is present
only when biomolecules are present therefore
this is the concerning factor for in proposed
device.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-4">
          <title>3. Short Gate and Full Gate TFET Based</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-5">
          <title>Biosensor</title>
          <p>
            Sayan Kanungo in 2015 carried out
performance analysis of both SG-TFET and
FG-DMTFET. In the device, the two gates
operate simultaneously and the dual gate
structure enhances biomolecule impact on
dielectric constant and leads to high sensitivity
of the sensors [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">6</xref>
            ]. To enhance the value of
tunneling current, Si-Ge was used as source
with germanium concentration of 0.5 in both
SG-TFET and FG-TFET. The gate length of
short gate TFET was kept 20 nm and Full gate
was kept 42 nm as we can see in Figure 3(a) and
(b). The SG-DMTFET limited the impact of
ambipolar conductivity and showed improved
sensitivity.
          </p>
          <p>
            Figure 3 (a): Structure of Short gate Tunnel
Field Effect Transistor based Biosensor [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">6</xref>
            ]
          </p>
          <p>
            Figure 3 (b): Structure of Double gate
Tunnel Field Effect Transistor based Biosensor
[
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">6</xref>
            ]
          </p>
          <p>The full gated DMTFET consists of full
gated intrinsic channel as which decreases the
width of barrier and hence sensitivity is
achieved. Further due to one-dimensional
tunneling the on current of Dual metal gate is
limited. The short gate TFET should be
operated in specific biasing range and this
precise biasing can enhance the sensitivity of
SG-TFET (Short Gate Tunnel Field Effect
Transistor) that can produce sensitivity of drain
current almost seven times that of FG-TFET
(Full Gate Tunnel Field Effect Transistor). The
ID-VG curve of both short gate and full gate
TFET based Biosensor is shown in Figure 3 (c).
Further, it is being said that structural
enhancement in FG-TFET and material
specifications can increase the sensitivity
performance.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-6">
          <title>4. Junctionless based electrically doped</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-7">
          <title>TFET based Biosensor</title>
          <p>The device structure is made of n+ heavily
doped Si layer and isolated gates to form
intrinsic region and p+ source region under the
polarity gate (PG) and control gate (CG). The
polarity bias of Si body is similar to that of
conventional tunnel field effect transistor [14].
As the device is junction less, the device is free
from doping control, thermal dissipation and
fabrication complexity as shown in Figure 4 (a).</p>
          <p>Figure 4 (a): Schematic of Junctionless
based dielectric modulated TFET based
Biosensor [14]
Figure 4 (b): ID-VG characteristics at different
dielectric constant [14]</p>
          <p>The performance of device is increased due
to the absence of junction and improved the
issue of random dopant fluctuation. The drain
current sensitivity curve is shown in Figure 4
(c) and ID-VG curve at different dielectric
constant is shown in Figure 4 (b). Although it is
free from short channel effects, fabrication
issues etc but still the issue of ambipolar
conductivity persist therefore structural
modulation of the device is still needed.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-8">
          <title>5. Dual-gate source electrode dielectric</title>
          <p>modulated based Biosensor
Deepak Soni et al proposed a structure that uses
charge plasma -based concept for detection of
biomolecule for efficiently thereby increasing
the sensitivity.</p>
          <p>Figure 5 (a): Schematic of Dual gate source
electrode dielectric TFET Biosensor [11]</p>
          <p>Figure 5 (b): SS comparison curve of
conventional and proposed TFET device [11]
Figure 5 (c): Sensitivity comparison curve of
both conventional and proposed TFET device
[11]</p>
          <p>This research was carried out for improving
the response time and sensitivity of Tunnel
Field Effect based biosensor using the concept
of formation of Plasma. The sensitivity was
improved by adding an electrode on the source
region of conventional biosensors using
negative supply for extending cavity above the
region of source [11]. The introduction of
additional Silicon Electrode with negative
supply voltage for forming the cavity over the
source region overcomes the issues related to
abrupt junction formation at junction of source
and channel as shown in Figure 5 (a). It was
also observed that issues related to solubility
limit of silicon material due to layer of Plasma
formation of holes near Si-HFO2 interface was
also solved. It has been concluded that excess
biomolecules in the region of source and cavity
increased the concentration of plasma layer of
holes near Si- HFO2 because of better coupling
that in return improved the subthreshold swing,
capability of sensing and the sensing speed of
Biosensors as shown in Figure 5 (b) and (c).
Transistion metal Dichalcogenides Showed excellent sensitivity and sharp threshold of
material based Biosensor 50 mv/dec
Dielectric modulated L-Shaped
Gate Field Effect Transistor based
Biosensor</p>
          <p>Proposed device is suitable for ultra sensitive and
low consumption biosensors.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-9">
          <title>6. Transition metal Dichalcogenides</title>
          <p>material based Biosensor
Transition Metal Dichalcogenides material
based TFET is proposed in 2019 for label-free
detection of Biomolecules. In recent years
stretchable and flexible electrons have gained
more attention in different fields like robotic
and medical fields because of their
advancement in performance. The TFET
biosensor made by using silicon are offering
excellent performance but their mechanical
flexibility is not good due to its brittle nature.
This device showed sharp threshold of 50
mv/dec as shown in Figure 6 and excellent
sensitivity.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-10">
          <title>7. Dielectric Modulated L-shaped Gate Field</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-11">
          <title>Effect Transistor based Biosensor.</title>
          <p>The research carried out by Chen Chong,
Hongxia Liu shows the range of current
sensitivity, subthreshold swing sensitivity and
sensitivity of threshold voltage of the proposed
structure. The material used for making source,
drain, channel and substrate was silicon. The
gate dielectric used was HfO2 [13]. The study
was carried out by using six small biomolecules
with different dielectric constant filled in
different nanocavity thickness operated at
different gate voltages as shown in Figure 7 (a)</p>
          <p>Figure 7 (a): Schematic view of Dielectric
Modulated L-shaped Gate Field Effect
Transistor based Biosensor [13]</p>
          <p>The simulation was carried out and was
observed that current sensitivity can be
increased as high as 2321, the sensitivity of
threshold voltage could reach 0.4 and
sensitivity of SS could reach 0.7 as shown in
Figure 7(b) and 7(c). The proposed device is
appropriate for ultra-sensitive,
lowconsumption biosensors. It can be said from the
simulated result that greater the relative
permittivity of biomolecules, smaller the cavity
will be and the higher the amount of positive
charge, higher will be the sensitivity of the
proposed biosensor.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-12">
          <title>1.3 Conclusion</title>
          <p>In the above discussion a brief literature review
and performance comparison in terms of device
structure and sensitivity is done along with
summary of comparison based on performance
and limitations as shown in Figure 8. It can be
concluded that sensitivity is related to various
parameters but majorly 5 parameters are
directly related to improvement in sensitivity 1)
Device size and structure 2) material used to
make device 3) Oxide thickness and gate length
4) position of cavity and fill factor 5)
subthreshold characteristic and drain current.
Although TFET based devices are free from
short channel effects but there are another
factors that are of high concern like ambipolar
conductivity, steric hindrance, fabrication
complexity and precise biasing condition. This
review analyzed various biosensors and
therefore different structures has been proposed
to make device more sensitive having quick
response time but still various parameters could
be studied for further improvement in
Biosensing application to be able to work in real
time as biosensor. This study further concluded
that Dielectric modulated L-shaped TFET [11]
based biosensors achieved good range of
sensitivity as compared to all the previously
designed biosensors.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. References</title>
      <p>[1]</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>P, Mehrotra " biosensors and their</title>
        <p>applications," Science direct, pp. 1-7,
2016.
,[5]</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Brajesh Kumar Kaushik, Prabhat</title>
        <p>Kumar Dubey, "Transition metal
dichalcogenide material based tunneling
field-effect transistor for label free
biosensing application," SPIE digital
Library, vol. 11087, 2019.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Hongxia Liu, Shulong Wang, Shupeng</title>
        <p>Chen, Haiwu Xie and Chen Chong,
"Sensitivity Analysis of Biosensors
Based on a Dielectric-Modulated
LShaped Gate Field-Effect Transistor,"
Micromachine MDPI, vol. 12, no. 1,
2020.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>Kaushal Nigam, Dheeraj Sharma and</title>
        <p>Bandi Venkata Chandan, "Junctionless
based dielectric modulated electrically
doped tunnel FET based biosensor for
label‐free detection," Micro and Nano
Letters, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 452-456, 2018.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lyons</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>LeLand C</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Clark Jr. Champ "ELECTRODE SYSTEMS FOR CONTINUOUS MONITORING IN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY,"</article-title>
          <source>The New York Academy of Sciences</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>102</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>1</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>29</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>45</lpage>
          ,
          <year>1962</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Juan</given-names>
            <surname>Eduardo</surname>
          </string-name>
          Sosa-Hernandez and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Gustavo</given-names>
            <surname>Hernandez-Vargas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Electrochemical Biosensors: A Solution to Pollution Detection with Reference to Environmental Contaminants,"</article-title>
          <source>Biosensors MDPI</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>8</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>2</issue>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Anran</given-names>
            <surname>Gao</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Na Lu, Yuelin Wang_
          <article-title>Tie Li “Robust ultrasensitive tunneling-FET biosensor for point-of-care diagnostics</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” Nature</source>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>[6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]</source>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Narang</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>IEEE Trans Electron Devices</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>59</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>10</issue>
          , p.
          <fpage>2809</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2817</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Banerjee K. Sarkar</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Fundamental limitations of conventional-FET biosensors: Quantum-mechanicaltunneling tothe rescue,"</article-title>
          <source>in Device Res Conf</source>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chattopadhy</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gupta</surname>
            <given-names>PS</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kanugo</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>IEEE Trans Electron Devices</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>63</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>6</issue>
          , p.
          <fpage>2589</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2596</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cao</surname>
            <given-names>W</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , vol.
          <volume>067141</volume>
          , pp.
          <fpage>0</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>9</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shinwari</surname>
            <given-names>MF</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shinwari</surname>
            <given-names>MW</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Sensors Actuators B Chemical</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>160</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>1</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>441</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>447</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Choi S-J</surname>
            , Han
            <given-names>J-W</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Park</surname>
            <given-names>TJ</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            <given-names>SY</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Choi Y-K</surname>
            , Ahn
            <given-names>J-H</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Nanodevices Letter</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>10</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>8</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>2934</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2938</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vandenberghe</surname>
            <given-names>WG</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Verhulst</surname>
            <given-names>AS</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Tunnel field-effect transistor without gate-drain overlap,"</article-title>
          <source>Applied Physics Letters</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>91</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>5</issue>
          ,
          <year>2007</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Dheeraj</given-names>
            <surname>Sharma</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Mohd. Aslam Shivendra Yadav, Deepak Soni,
          <article-title>"Approach for the improvement of sensitivity and sensing speed of TFETbased biosensor by using plasma formation concept,"</article-title>
          <source>Micro and Nano Letters</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>13</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>12</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1728</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1733</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>