=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-2825/paper9
|storemode=property
|title=Applying DEMO To Electronic Prescribing and Regulatory Compliance Within The English NHS: A Case Study
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2825/paper9.pdf
|volume=Vol-2825
|authors=Desmond Jolomi Omadoye
}}
==Applying DEMO To Electronic Prescribing and Regulatory Compliance Within The English NHS: A Case Study==
Applying DEMO To Electronic Prescribing and Regulatory Compliance
Within The English NHS: A Case Study*
Desmond Jolomi Omadoye1[0000−0002−0284−5731] []
1
University of Luxembourg, 2, avenue de l’Université L-4365 Esch-sur-Alzette
1
http://www.desmondbenjamin.com
1
desmond.omadoye.001@student.uni.lu
Abstract
Healthcare systems in most developed nations are dynamic, complex, and heavily
regulated because of the nature of its activities and the implication for patient safety.
In the UK, the National Health Service (NHS), a publicly funded health organisation
is one such heavily regulated system, paid for by taxpayers’ contributions and
designed to ensure care is free and should be provided at the point of need. Since the
1990’s there has been an increase in the regulatory requirements of the English
NHS arising from systemic institutional failures as well as medication error, which
have often led to the adverse effects for patients. Healthcare organisations thus have a
duty of care and a legal obligation towards patients, while patients on the other hand
have a legitimate expectation that an agreement reached between the patient and the
healthcare organisation in the pursuit of a course of treatment will progress safely and
achieve the agreed outcome. The paper summarises the current state of my thesis and
how design and engineering methodology for organisation (DEMO) can be applied to
electronic prescribing within the English NHS for the purpose of reducing the
prevalent medication error as widely reported during prescribing and administration.
Keywords: Medication Error · Electronic Prescribing · Business Process
Compliance Management.
1
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
1 Introduction
The many healthcare regulations in western economies can seem overwhelming to
those whose task it is to provide care. The UK healthcare organisation is an
example of a heavily regulated system designed to ensure that patients receive the
level of care required for their safety and wellbeing. Since the 1990’s there has
been an increase in the regulatory requirements of the English NHS arising from
systemic institutional failures, many of which have often led to the death of
patients [19] These institutional failures have led to an increase in the number of
regulatory bodies, some with statutory powers, others as best practice with the
sole purpose of placing a spotlight on the patients care throughout the journey
[32]. However, there is also evidence of a disparate level of regulatory body all of
whom play a role in the enforcement of patient safety standard.
These organisations typically work in silos with little or no coordination thereby
creating confusion of what is required of them [32]. The recent research by 32
suggests that there is no integrated approach to identify the many uncoordinated
regulatory actors by which the NHS are required either by law, convention, and
practice to comply with. This has often led to ineffective improvement efforts,
overlapping of responsibilities and challenges with compliance efforts. To avoid
compliance problems with the regulatory bodies, enterprises are putting more
efforts into the compliance related activities and employ several compliance re-
porting strategies namely: design–time, run–time and auditing [25].The design
strategy is preventive and thus the focus of this thesis. In this stage, the
compliance requirements are captured through a logic–based requirements
modelling framework and propagated into business processes. Any non–
compliant issues
2
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
can be detected in the early stages, thus saving an enterprise’s efforts, time, and
financial resources. [25]
2 Business Process Compliance Management
In complex high-risk industries such as healthcare, compliance is important.
Healthcare compliance is the process by which service providers follow the rules
and practices within healthcare. Business Process Compliance ensures that
business processes are in accordance with relevant compliance requirements [35]
such as the Human Medicines Regulations 2012, GDPR, Medicine Act 1968,
Regulation 22 of the Health and Social Act, HIPPA and HITECH etc. While
some observers believe that a form of oversight is needed because human lives
and health are involved [17], others believe it has become too burdensome.[14].
Since its creation in 1948, the NHS is on record to have taken on numerous
technological transformational projects with the aim of ensuring patient safety.
However, the NHS digitization process has not always been successful. For
example, the failure of the NHS to successfully implement the National Pro-
gramme for IT (NPfIT) is an example [29]. This has been described as one of
the biggest information technology failures in modern times [29].
The digitization project was designed to be the first NHS nationally
implemented electronic health record (EHR) across NHS hospitals and
General Practitioners. In 2011, the NPfIT was dismantled due to its failure to
achieve its objective at a cost of over £12billion [6]. Not to be deterred by the
failings of the NPfIT, the NHS currently has a five year forward review plan
[27],[23] put together by various stakeholders(actors). Amongst the
stakeholders are the Care Quality Commission, Public Health England and
NHS Improvement, patient groups, clinicians and independent experts. The
five year forward review plan is designed to digitize the health service by
introducing the use of technology within the NHS. Among the technology
being introduced within the healthcare sphere is electronic prescribing. This
should not come as a surprise as reports suggest that there are a myriad of
documents highlighting medication error as one of the major causes of
medical errors [2].
2.1 Medication Error
The WHO [33] defines medication error as “any preventable event
that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or patient harm
while the medication is in the control of the health care professional,
patient, or consumer. Such events may be related to professional
practice, health care products, procedures, and systems, including
prescribing, order communication, product labelling, pack- aging, and
nomenclature, compounding, dispensing, distribution, administration,
education, monitoring and use.”
Other authors have defined medication error as ‘a failure in the treatment
process that leads to or has the potential to lead to harm to the patient [2].
3
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
In the UK over 273 million medication errors are reported to occur every year
[38],[15], [16]. Apart from the financial consequences and burden on the NHS
organisation, there is also the issue of litigation, as reports suggested that a 1/4
of all litigation claims in general medical practice were due to medication errors
[2] often leading to the death of patients. Reports also suggest that these errors
are made at every point of a patients journey with 54 percent made during the
administration of the drugs and the other 21 percent made during prescribing
and 16 percent during dispensing. The report also suggests that 1/3 of the
potentially harmful medication errors are made in primary care during
prescribing (GP, pharmacy, dentist, optician services) [15]
These statistics highlight serous concerns and the need for healthcare
organisations to ensure compliance with relevant regulatory demands. Health-
care organisations as highlighted by [13], have a duty to build and design a
safe business process that ensure that patients are safe from unintended harm.
Healthcare organisations are therefore required to demonstrate that their busi-
ness processes conform with the relevant regulatory demands, conventions or
best practice in order to safeguard patient safety. In the UK, patient safety has
become a matter of public and regulatory concern [19]. However, evidence
suggest that the NHS still has a long way to go in effectively dealing with this
problem. [28]
2.2 Purpose And Motivation of The Thesis
The main purpose of this thesis therefore is to investigate how design and
engineering methodology for organisation (DEMO) can be applied to
electronic prescribing and administration within the NHS for the purpose of
reducing the prevalent medication error widely reported and thus assist in
medication compliance. It will analyse the administration of medications by
nurses, doctors, and their corresponding commitment to patients. In the UK
over 273 million medication error are reported to occur every year [38],[15],[16].
This high level of medication error and the need for patient safety has seen the
rapid transition from paper prescription to electronic prescribing.[1].
3 DEMO
DEMO is believed to be a methodology for modelling business processes that
conceives organizations as social systems, consisting of an interrelated network
of people in specific roles acting according to their specific responsibilities and
authorities and coordinating their actions by means of communication. DEMO
assumes, in line with the Language Action Perspective (LAP), that
communication is a kind of action that creates commitments to act between
actors” [7] This thesis focuses on the human centric approach to electronic
prescribing and business process compliance using DEMO with particular
reference to the commitment and transaction among the actors during the prescribing and
administration of medication within and acute NHS hospital. To the best of my knowledge
DEMO has not been applied within the NHS with reference to electronic prescribing and
the reduction of inpatient medication error and will thus make a significant contribution to
electronic prescribing and patient safety.
4
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
4 Related work
The perspective of DEMO in healthcare has been published in [22][10]. In my
opinion, the view of DEMO in the NHS relating to electronic prescribing and
business process compliance is yet to be fully researched.
5 Aim Of The Thesis
The overarching aim of this thesis is to apply DEMO to the business process
compliance with reference to electronic prescribing within the English NHS
healthcare system to avoid medication error and its corresponding adverse
effect. DEMO will be applied to effectively capture the business process
compliance requirements of medication prescription and administration amongst
the stakeholders/actors during the patient journey in an acute foundation trust
in the south east of England. Since its creation in 1948, the NHS is on record to
have taken on numerous technological transformational projects with the aim of
ensuring patient safety. However, the NHS digitization process has not always
been successful. For example, the failure of the NHS to successfully implement
the National Programme for IT (NPfIT) is an example.[29]
6 Problem Definition
Many studies to date have highlighted the prevalent level of medication error
and the need for a stricter compliance framework. [31][26][21][30][30] However,
despite continued effort to address this problem, hospitals in the UK and the
rest of the world still record yearly cases of medication error thus putting patient
lives at risk of possible adverse effect. [12][18] The introduction of electronic
prescribing has been identified as a way of addressing medication error by
moving from the use of paper prescription and the need to transcribe to
electronically prescribing medication[38] [3][34][9][1][8][24] As with the
introduction of any information system, the question of capturing the
requirements to support the implementation of an information system or
ensuring that the business process has been adequately complied with has been
highly debated. Practitioners such as [11] are wary of the traditional waiter
approach of requirement gathering, while various scholars and practitioners
writing in the field of healthcare management have observed that the high level
of systems not meeting the objectives of the organisations or the users has been
due to sociotechnical factors such as ineffective change management, a lack of
stakeholder engagement, unsuitable
5
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
software and outdated IT infrastructure [5][39][4], and others believe that
sufficient attention has not be paid to the role of agile project management
methodology for requirement capturing within the healthcare industry [20] or as
cited in [22] that it is only by knowing what people do are we able to develop a
system that supports their activities”.
Although many authors have highlighted the causes of medication error
[9][7][31][21] there is insufficient information about the approach needed to
ensure that an electronic prescribing system adequately addresses the prevalent
error during prescribing and administration of medication. As part of the NHS
digital transformation policy, NHS hospitals are expected to go paperless by
2023 while it simultaneously aims to become one of the safest healthcare
systems in the world. The use of electronic prescribing has been identified as a
means by which the NHS hopes to reduce medication and pre- scribing errors
whilst addressing compliance demands. The NHS Dictionary of Medicine and
Device (dm+d) is one aspect of ensuring compliance through e use of codes
for standardisation of drug prescription and administration. While the use of
technology is believed to improve patient care it is however believed to raise
considerable challenges in ensuring patient safety [36] [37]. Digitisation
presents unique challenges for compliance and in order to ensure the
continuous guaranteed compliance the concept of compliance management
needs to be considered during all phases of the patient journey during the
administration of medication.
6.0.1 The problem
The high level of medication error and the need to streamline business processes
for patient safety and regulatory compliance In the UK, patient safety has be-
come a matter of public and regulatory concerns [20][21]. However, evidence
suggest that the NHS still has a long way to go in effectively dealing with this
problem [22]
6.0.2 Proposed Solution
The application of DEMO to electronic prescribing to improve the
administration and prescription process of an NHS hospital in England to
reduce the prevalent level of medication error and ensure compliance.
7 Overview of a prescription process
The process map represents a high-level description of a prescription process in
a foundation trust hospital in the South of England.
6
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
Figure 1: Sample of a prescription process
Figure 2: sample of a current prescribing process
8 Research Question
RQ1: The main research question for this thesis is: How can DEMO be applied to
electronic prescribing in both outpatient and inpatients so that the electronic
prescribing processes can be improved upon to attain business process
compliance and a reduction in medication error.
9 Research Objectives
1. Assess the current state of medication error.
2. Assess the current state of regulatory compliance.
3. Identify all the activities that take place from the moment a patient is seen.
7
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
by the GP and referred to the hospital, up to the point where they are
seen in a hospital, by a doctor, nurse and triaged, admitted, or discharged
where medication is prescribed.
4. Identify all actors and their role involved in electronic prescribing along
the patient pathway.
5. Define the concept of essential actors for the purpose of this thesis.
10 Research Methodology
The proposed approach takes the form of a literature review that highlights the
challenges and issues which lead to medication error and non-compliance. An
in-depth action research will be embarked on a major electronic prescribing
process improvement effort that emphasizes the transaction and commitment
of the identified actors in a healthcare organisation in England.
10.0.1 Data Collection
Desmond Benjamin and Co are a health IT company and owned by me and
currently working with an electronic prescribing consulting firm who are
currently implementing electronic prescribing at an NHS hospital.
11 Conclusion and state of thesis
I currently work in the healthcare sector where I am the lead technical developer
for the implementation of electronic prescribing for one of the largest public
sector healthcare organisations in the south east of England. I started my
doctoral studies at Unilux three semesters ago as a part time doctoral student
with 7 years to complete the programme. The time spent on my studies is
aligned with my day-to-day tasks, where I spend 3hrs a week working one way
or another towards my research. As part of my role I also ensure the
prescribing system is configured and developed to prevent medication error (a
focus of my the- sis). I am still at the preliminary stages of my thesis and
currently undergoing my literature review and will very much welcome
feedback from the doctoral consortium.
References
[1] Elske Ammenwerth, Petra Schnell-Inderst, Christof Machan, and Uwe
Siebert. The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and ad-
8
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
verse drug events: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical
Informatics Association, 15(5):585–600, 2008.
[2] Jeffrey K Aronson. Medication errors: what they are, how they happen,
and how to avoid them. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine,
102(8):513–521, 2009.
[3] David W Bates. Using information technology to reduce rates of medication
errors in hospitals. Bmj, 320(7237):788–791, 2000.
[4] Marc Berg. Implementing information systems in health care organizations:
myths and challenges. International journal of medical informatics, 64(2-
3):143–156, 2001.
[5] Albert Boonstra, Arie Versluis, and Janita FJ Vos. Implementing electronic
health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review. BMC health
services research, 14(1):370, 2014.
[6] Oliver Campion-Awwad, Alexander Hayton, Leila Smith, and Mark
Vuaran. The national programme for it in the nhs. A case history, 2014.
[7] Michael R Cohen. Causes of medication errors. Medication Errors. Wash-
ington: American Pharmacists Association, pages 55–66, 2007.
[8] Annabelle Collins. Jeremy hunt announces scheme to tackle
medication errors. https://www.chemistanddruggist.co.uk/news/ dh-focus-reducing-
medication-errors. Accessed July 23, 2020.
[9] Jacquelyn Crane and Frederick G Crane. Preventing medication errors
in hospitals through a systems approach and technological innovation: a
prescription for 2010. Hospital topics, 84(4):3–8, 2006.
[10] D Dias. Method for improving healthcare management using enterprise
ontology. PhD thesis, Doctoral dissertation, Master Dissertation from In-
stituto Superior Técnico, 2012.
[11] Jan LG Dietz and Hans BF Mulder. Enterprise Ontology: A Human- Centric
Approach to Understanding the Essence of Organisation. Springer Nature,
2020.
[12] Matt Discombe. Cqc launches criminal investigation into medication inci dents at
major acute trust. https://www.hsj.co.uk/patient-safety/
exclusive-cqc-launches-criminal-investigation-into-medication-incidents-at-major-acute- 7028693.article.
Accessed October 23, 2020.
[13] Molla S Donaldson, Janet M Corrigan, Linda T Kohn, et al. To err is
human: building a safer health system, volume 6. National Academies
Press, 2000.
[14] Nigel Edwards. Burdensome regulation of the nhs, 2016.
9
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
[15] R Elliott, Elizabeth Camacho, Fiona Campbell, Dina Jankovic, Mar- rissa
Martyn St James, Eva Kaltenthaler, Ruth Wong, M Sculpher, and Rita
Faria. Prevalence and economic burden of medication errors in the nhs in
england. Rapid evidence synthesis and economic analysis of the
prevalence and burden of medication error in the UK, 2018.
[16] Rachel Ann Elliott, Elizabeth Camacho, Dina Jankovic, Mark J Sculpher,
and Rita Faria. Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and eco-
nomic burden of medication error in england. BMJ Quality & Safety, 2020.
[17] Robert I Field. Why is health care regulation so complex? Pharmacy and
Therapeutics, 33(10):607, 2008.
[18] Hugo L Folli, Robert L Poole, William E Benitz, and Janita C Russo. Med-
ication error prevention by clinical pharmacists in two children’s hospitals.
Pediatrics, 79(5):718–722, 1987.
[19] Robert Francis. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust
public inquiry: executive summary, volume 947. The Stationery Office,
2013.
[20] Rav Goodison, Elizabeth M Borycki, and Andre W Kushniruk. Use of agile
project methodology in health care it implementations: A scoping review.
In ITCH, pages 140–145, 2019.
[21] Enam Alhagh Charkhat Gorgich, Sanam Barfroshan, Gholamreza Ghor-
eishi, and Maryam Yaghoobi. Investigating the causes of medication errors
and strategies to prevention of them from nurses and nursing student view-
point. Global journal of health science, 8(8):220, 2016.
[22] Nathalie Habing, Jan Dietz, and Berti Zwetsloot-Schonk. Activity patterns
in health care: identifying building blocks for the cpr. ACM Siggroup
Bulletin, 22(2):9–15, 2001.
[23] Chris Ham. Next steps on the nhs five year forward view, 2017.
[24] Crouch Hannah. Jeremy hunt promises £75m for e-prescribing
acceleration. https://www.digitalhealth.net/2018/02/
jeremy-hunt-e-prescribing-acceleration/. Accessed July 23,
2020.
[25] Mustafa Hashmi, Guido Governatori, Ho-Pun Lam, and Moe Thandar
Wynn. Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and
challenges ahead. Knowledge and Information Systems, 57(1):79–133,
2018.
[26] Peggy Hewitt. Nurses’ perceptions of the causes of medication errors: An
integrative literature review. Medsurg Nursing, 19(3):159–167, 2010.
10
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
[27] Matthew Honeyman, Phoebe Dunn, and Helen McKenna. A digital nhs. An
introduction to the digital agenda and plans for implementation. London:
Kings Fund, 2016.
[28] John Illingworth. Continuous Improvement of Patient Safety: The Case
for Change in the NHS. Health Foundation, 2015.
[29] Taghreed Justinia. The uk’s national programme for it: Why was it dis-
mantled? Health services management research, 30(1):2–9, 2017.
[30] Richard N Keers, Steven D Williams, Jonathan Cooke, and Darren M
Ashcroft. Causes of medication administration errors in hospitals: a
systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Drug safety,
36(11):1045–1067, 2013.
[31] Pamela Nichols, Tandy-Sue Copeland, Ian A Craib, Paul Hopkins, and
David G Bruce. Learning from error: identifying contributory causes of
medication errors in an australian hospital. Medical Journal of Australia,
188(5):276–279, 2008.
[32] Eirini Oikonomou, Jane Carthey, Carl Macrae, and Charles Vincent. Pa-
tient safety regulation in the nhs: mapping the regulatory landscape of
healthcare. BMJ open, 9(7):e028663, 2019.
[33] World Health Organization et al. Medication errors. World Health Orga-
nization, 2016.
[34] David C Radley, Melanie R Wasserman, Lauren EW Olsho, Sarah J Shoe-
maker, Mark D Spranca, and Bethany Bradshaw. Reduction in medica-
tion errors in hospitals due to adoption of computerized provider order
entry systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,
20(3):470–476, 2013.
[35] Stefan Sackmann, Stephan Kuehnel, and Tobias Seyffarth. Using business
process compliance approaches for compliance management with regard to
digitization: evidence from a systematic literature review. In International
Conference on Business Process Management, pages 409–425. Springer,
2018.
[36] Dean F Sittig, Adam Wright, Enrico Coiera, Farah Magrabi, Raj Rat-
wani, David W Bates, and Hardeep Singh. Current challenges in health
information technology–related patient safety. Health informatics journal,
26(1):181–189, 2020.
[37] Sarah P Slight, Clare L Tolley, David W Bates, Rachel Fraser, Theophile
Bigirumurame, Adetayo Kasim, Konstantinos Balaskonis, Steven Narrie,
Andrew Heed, E John Orav, et al. Medication errors and adverse drug
events in a uk hospital during the optimisation of electronic prescriptions:
a prospective observational study. The Lancet Digital Health, 1(8):e403–
e412, 2019.
11
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
[38] Jacqui Wise. Government takes steps to reduce annual burden of medica-
tion errors in england, 2018.
[39] Stephanie O Zandieh, Kahyun Yoon-Flannery, Gilad J Kuperman, Daniel J
Langsam, Daniel Hyman, and Rainu Kaushal. Challenges to ehr implemen-
tation in electronic-versus paper-based office practices. Journal of general
internal medicine, 23(6):755–761, 2008.
12
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).