<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Domain description methods for creating an industry digital platform*</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dilara Musina</string-name>
          <email>musinad@yandex.ru</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Azat Yangirov</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sergey Kharitonov</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Bashkir State University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>32, Zaki Validi Str., Ufa, 450057, Russian Federation</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Ltd “Segment-Pro”</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>156/3, Mendeleev Str., Ufa, 450080, Russian Federation</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Ufa State Petroleum Technological University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>1, Kosmonavtov Str., Ufa, 450062, Russian Federation</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The article outlines the main approaches to modeling the subject area of the industry based on the method of ontologies and cognitive maps. The relevance of describing the subject areas of economic sectors in the process of creating a digital infrastructure of the Russian economy is revealed. In ontological modeling, methods of identifying concepts, relations, and instances that are applicable to all sectors of the economy are indicated. An approach to the formation of an ontological model of the industry, its general form and a method for assessing the quality of the resulting model are proposed. The subordination of applied industry ontologies with meta-ontologies of the upper level is reflected. The universal classes and subclasses of the industry ontology, their properties, and the taxonomy of building hierarchies are indicated. The difficulties that developers of applied industry ontologies may face are described. A two-level cognitive model with the ability to track external impulse influences is proposed. The vertices and connections of the directed graph are described, as well as the qualitative parameters of the vertices, which can be used to track the crisis state of the industry. The proposed approaches can be used by specialists when creating information and communication platforms for the digitalization of industries. The authors propose to apply the developed modeling mechanism in the description of the subject area when creating a digital platform for managing the agro-industrial complex.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Ontology</kwd>
        <kwd>Cognitive map</kwd>
        <kwd>Industry</kwd>
        <kwd>Model</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Taking into account Russia's lag behind the world's leading economies in terms of the
introduction of information and communication technologies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], a corresponding
program document was adopted at the legislative level [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. One of the main indicators
of its implementation will be the creation and implementation of industry digital
platforms. In this regard, the authors were puzzled by the preparation of the concept
of creating a digital platform for the agro-industrial complex, which at this stage
occupies a closing position in the Russian "digitalization funnel".
      </p>
      <p>The industry digital platform as a virtual infrastructure of the industry should
provide for the maximum set of applied tools for its development. At the same time,
the development of the industry will be assessed according to the indicators set by the
industry strategy, and the tools should be fully functional in order to provide
maximum opportunities for all platform participants. The set of tools will be formed
based on the variety of platform users, their needs, goals and objectives (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p>Knowledge
Uses</p>
      <p>Receives</p>
      <p>Forms</p>
      <p>Subject
management</p>
      <p>Data
Information</p>
      <p>Information
Coding</p>
      <p>Decoding</p>
      <p>Context / Knowledge</p>
      <p>Uses
Perceives</p>
      <p>An object
management</p>
      <p>
        Industry digital platform
Modern tools for describing the subject area are the methods of ontological [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] and
cognitive modeling [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. In this aspect, ontology is understood according to T. Gruber's
definition, “... as an explicit specification of conceptualization” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. Methods of
deduction (when passing from ontological classes to instances and describing their
properties), principles of taxonomy (when building a hierarchy of classes and
subclasses), and the method of semantic networks are used as methods for building an
industry ontology. The deduction method in the development of a hierarchy of
classes, which was called the “top-down development process” in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], in our opinion,
is most suitable for the development of industry-specific ontologies. At the same time,
it should be understood that there are meta-ontologies, such as plant ontologies,
animal ontologies, which, for example, will be partially involved in the ontology of
the agro-industrial complex in the further taxonomic hierarchy of producers. In this
case, the method of building semantic networks from several ontologies will be
applied. When constructing a cognitive model, the theory of systems analysis, the
method of directed graphs, is used. In terms of building a cognitive map, the
developments and approaches set forth in the works [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7 ref8">7-8</xref>
        ] are applied.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>In the process of ontological modeling, the terminology was defined that describes the
industry in a virtual environment, classes of system objects, relations, and instances
were identified.</p>
      <p>The ontological model has a general form:
O = &lt;C, L, В, I&gt;,</p>
      <p>Where С – many classes {С1, С2, …, Сq} and their interpretation in the subject
area;</p>
      <p>L – many relationships {L1, L2, …, Lk};
В – class properties;
I – many class instances {I1, I2, …, Ik}.</p>
      <p>Terminology is described through the creation of a thesaurus.</p>
      <p>If we proceed from the purpose of the industry to produce goods or provide
services, then suppliers, consumers, producers, government structures can be
distinguished as universal industry classes. In turn, the classes must be subclassed.
For example, suppliers can be divided into subclasses on one basis for individuals and
legal entities, on another basis for suppliers of material resources, services, labor
resources, financial. Consumers can also be divided into subclasses for different
reasons (classification criteria): individuals and legal entities; wholesale, small
wholesale, retail; consumers of raw materials, semi-finished products, finished
products, etc.</p>
      <p>Each subclass can also be refined and instantiated. Further detailing, for example,
the subclass of suppliers of material resources, will make it possible to single out
suppliers of equipment, means of labor, raw materials, semi-finished products, spare
parts, etc. Another basis for their classification may be the country of origin: a
domestic supplier or a foreign one. Concretization will make it possible to form a list
of domain instances. For example, if an ontological model is drawn up for the
agroindustrial complex of the Russian Federation, then the class of producers at the level
of the formation of a list of copies of the ontology will cover all producers of
agricultural products in the country. The maximum number of concepts of one level,
or the depth of the "branch", should not exceed the known Yngve-Miller number
(7 ± 2).</p>
      <p>Relationships in different sources are called differently: slots, roles, properties.
They describe the properties of classes and instances. For example, headcount and
revenue will be important slots for manufacturers and suppliers. It is in the context of
industries that this is important, since these parameters, for example, for a supplier
determine participation in purchases, and for a manufacturer - participation in some
government programs to support manufacturers.</p>
      <p>
        To check the competence of the created industry ontology, it is proposed to use the
expert approach proposed in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. They asked the experts to form a list of questions to
test the competence of the ontology. At the same time, when assessing the quality of
ontology, where the subject area is an industry, it is necessary to involve industry
experts, IT specialists and ontology analysts. To test the ontology of the
agroindustrial complex, specific questions of the following type can be formulated:
─ What characteristics should be considered when choosing a resource provider?
─ LLC "Pervomay" is a large wholesale or small wholesale intermediary?
─ Does Kumys LLC belong to producers of agricultural raw materials or end
products?
─ Does Kumys LLC work with buyers directly or through a reseller?
─ Does Garant LLC provide consulting or leasing services?
      </p>
      <p>After creating an ontological model of the industry, the next stage is the formation
of a cognitive model. Cognitive modeling is based on cognitive (cognitive-target)
structuring of knowledge about an object and its external environment. The cognitive
model develops the ontological one by adding links between concepts and instances
of the ontological model. We propose to build a two-level cognitive model for the
industry. The cognitive model of the upper level will represent a directed graph of the
form: G = &lt;P, R&gt;.</p>
      <p>The vertices of the graph (set P = {pi}, i = ) are the concepts of the industry
ontology (producers, consumers, suppliers, intermediaries, government agencies). The
edges of the graph (R = {r = (pi, pj)}; i, j = ; i ≠ j) are connections between concepts.
In this case, the directions of the edges of the graph are determined by the influence of
one vertex of the graph (pi) on another (pj).</p>
      <p>The lower-level cognitive model will be a directed graph, the vertices of which will
be instances of the industry ontology. The number of vertices and the number of links
of such a graph will be an order of magnitude larger.</p>
      <p>
        Realizing that the economic category industry implies the implementation of the
management functional, we propose to supplement the directed graph of the lower
level with beacons signaling the state of system elements (ontology instances). The
indicators of the quality state will become such beacons for the vertices, and the
resistance coefficients for the edges. Then, based on the mathematical description of
the approach to tracking the impulse impact on the system from destabilizing factors,
borrowed from the publication [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], it is possible to build a cognitive model of the
industry, which will allow implementing the methods of soft management of the
industry. Methods of soft management of the industry are described in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>For example, indicators of the qualitative state of manufacturers can be the level of
the tax burden, sales volumes for several specified periods, which will be reflected by
the coefficient of variation, etc. and crisis zones for manufacturers, intermediaries,
suppliers,...). For example, it is possible to agree that the system enters a state of crisis
if the indicator of the quality state of 20% or more of the system's elements is below a
given critical level.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>
        The problem in the formation of this ontology can be unambiguously designated the
problem of combining ontologies. All applied ontologies face this problem [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref12">11-12</xref>
        ].
Differences in ontologies of the same subject areas are explained by the subjectivity
of the ontology authors. In addition, the approach to the construction of ontological
models for industry systems is subject to discussion, the method of constructing
ontologies differs from one author to another; there is no unambiguity in the set of
model elements. In this work, the authors proceeded from the recommendations [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ],
where the model contains four parameters, but a number of authors insist on
introducing into the model such parameters as axioms and inference algorithms on
ontologies. Axioms set the conditions for correlating concepts and relationships. The
question is subject to comprehension: should the expert and formalized methods be
combined when assessing the quality of industry ontology? The expert method is a
priority when creating ontological models of specific industries. While formalized
should also not be swept aside. It will allow at the initial level of building universal
industry ontology to identify the differences between the industry ontology from all
others.
5
6
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>Thus, the proposed methods of ontological and cognitive modeling will almost
completely describe the subject area for creating an industry digital platform. The
next level of domain description should be a business process model.</p>
      <p>The reported research was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the
government of the Bashkortostan Republic of the Russian Federation according to the
research project №19-410-020028 р_а.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Musina</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yangirov</surname>
            <given-names>A.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nasyrova</surname>
            <given-names>S.I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Dependence of a country's competitiveness on its information infrastructure</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS 80</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Conf</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Ser.,
          <fpage>2357</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1330</lpage>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2. Programma “
          <article-title>Digital Economy of the Russian Federation</article-title>
          . Moscow (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gangemi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Presutti</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Catenacci</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lehmann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nissim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>C-ODO: an OWL meta-model for collaborative ontology design</article-title>
          .
          <source>Noy</source>
          et al. (eds.): Proceeding of First CKC workshop, WWW2007 Conference, Banff. (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carvalho</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Tome Jose, A.B.:
          <article-title>Rule Based Fuzzy Cognitive Maps in Socio-Economic Systems</article-title>
          . IFSA-EUSFLAT,
          <year>1821</year>
          -
          <fpage>1826</fpage>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gruber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification</article-title>
          .
          <source>Knowledge Acquisition</source>
          ,
          <volume>5</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>199</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>220</lpage>
          (
          <year>1993</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gruninger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fox</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies</article-title>
          . Stanford (
          <year>1995</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Walliser</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Cognitive economics</article-title>
          . Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hodginson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>Cognitive process in strategic management: Some emerging trends and future direction</article-title>
          .
          <source>Handbook of Industrial, Work &amp; Organizational Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>401</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>441</lpage>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kochkarov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Salpagarov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <source>Cognitive Modeling of Regional Socio-Economic Systems: Managing Large Systems</source>
          ,
          <volume>63</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>137</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>145</lpage>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Musina</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kharitonov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Turganov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nizamova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Digital Communication Platform for the Agro Industrial Complex</article-title>
          .
          <source>Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>289</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>89</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>92</lpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dietz</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.:
          <source>Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology</source>
          . Springer, N.Y. (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Asim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wasim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Khan</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M.U.G.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mahmood</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abbasi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A survey of ontology learning techniques and applications</article-title>
          .
          <source>The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation</source>
          ,
          <volume>1</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>24</lpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Noy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>McGuinness</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology</article-title>
          .
          <source>Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report</source>
          , SMI-2001-
          <volume>0880</volume>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>