=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-2861/paper_9 |storemode=property |title=Digital Learning Environment in Modern Conditions |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2861/paper_9.pdf |volume=Vol-2861 |authors=Natalya Novik,Svetlana Bashinova,Natalya Kunshina,Aleksandr Sukharev }} ==Digital Learning Environment in Modern Conditions== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2861/paper_9.pdf
Digital Learning Environment in Modern Conditions
Natalya Novik a, Svetlana Bashinova a, Natalya Kunshina c, Aleksandr Sukharev c
a
  Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Kazan (Volga Region) Federal
  University, Institute of Psychology and Education”, 420008, Kazan, 18 Kremlyovskaya street; Russia.
b
  FSBEI HE «Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N. Tupolev–KAI», Institute of
  Radio electronics and Telecommunications, 420111, Kazan, 10 K.Marx street; Russia.


                 Abstract
                 Relevance. The COVID-19 pandemic caused the whirlwind development and search for new
                 ways of introducing and organizing a digital learning environment in educational institutions.
                 At present, this trend is primarily associated with the needs of the educational process
                 participants, it allows the use of modern technical means and technologies, thus significantly
                 enhancing and modernizing information and communication processes in society as well as
                 the level of intellectualization of individuals and all humanity in general; besides it increases
                 competition among educational institutions. The contradiction that arises in connection with
                 the understanding of the positive impact of digital learning environment on improving the
                 quality of teaching, on the one hand, and significant drawbacks on the part of methodological
                 support and scarce experimental data, on the other hand, covers the research problem. The
                 relevance and perspectives of the study of distance learning at various levels of education
                 have not been perceived and investigated fully. The purpose of the paper is to determine and
                 describe the momentous components of distance learning organization considered by Russian
                 and foreign scientists. Analysis of these studies can help update and specify
                 recommendations entitled to create and improve the evolving digital learning environment.
                 Method. A theoretical review of research papers over the past five years (2015–2020)
                 devoted to the study of the impact and organization of digital learning environment at all
                 levels of education. Results. The paper covers the analysis of participants’ interviews about
                 their attitude to online learning format. The obtained experience of using digital learning
                 environment and interaction with pupils, learners and students is analyzed; application
                 features, advantages and disadvantages of using such an educational opportunity are
                 determined. Conclusions. The survey showed that most authors emphasize a major role of
                 digitalization of the educational space in educational institutions of all levels of education in
                 difficult modern conditions. Interviews with participants of educational relationships brought
                 out both negative and positive aspects of online learning..

                 Keywords 1
                 digital learning environment, online learning, university teacher, pupil, learner, student,
                 educator.


1. Introduction
   The evolution of the modern education system, caused by a rapidly changing socio-economic
landscape of our society and reinforced by the reaction of education authorities to COVID-19, has led
to a really massive use of digital learning environment, which we understand as a set of opportunities

SLET-2020: International Scientific Conference on Innovative Approaches to the Application of Digital Technologies in Education,
November 12-13, 2020, Stavropol, Russia
EMAIL: novik-n-n@mail.ru (Natalya Novik); svetlana-bashinova@mail.ru (Svetlana Bashinova); nbkunshina@kai.ru (Natalya Kunshina);
s.alex966@gmail.com (Aleksandr Sukharev)
ORCID: 0000-0003-4751-911X (Natalya Novik); 000-0002-5124-7439 (Svetlana Bashinova); 000-0002-4764-0676 (Natalya Kunshina);
000-0001-6789-1408 (Aleksandr Sukharev)
            ©️ 2020 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
            Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
            CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)



                                                                                                                            97
available to both the teacher and students through the development of modern telecommunication
technologies.

2. The purpose of the paper
    The purpose of this paper is to determine and describe the momentous components of distance
learning organization considered by Russian and other scientists. Analysis of these studies can help update
and specify recommendations entitled to create and improve the evolving digital learning environment.

3. Literature review
    Many scientists-practitioners, both in Russia and other countries, are now sharing their limited
experience of work and training in a distance mode.
    Thus, Dyakova E.A. (2019) considers that the digitalization of education involves the
digitalization of all educational and methodological materials and creation of available knowledge
bases on their ground, the maximum transfer of educational process to the global network and
application of mobile and cloud technologies for training, the involvement of web 3.0 technologies
and intelligent systems in managing the educational process, widespread use of massive open
educational courses. Nikulina T.V. (2018) notes that the digitalization of education will allow students
to build an efficient individual educational trajectory and manage their own learning outcomes, to
overcome the barriers of traditional learning (the pace of mastering the program, choice of learning
forms and methods).
    In 2015, educators and psychologists issued The Manifesto for educational environment. They
stated: “Success in the creation and use of new techniques, however, depends on understanding the
educational paradigm: the goal of education is not the assimilation of knowledge, but rather the
development of an independent, curious, and collaborative personality” (Kushnir, 2015).
    Until quite recently, it was believed that Russian universities were still in the early stages of the
digitalization of education, just at the stage of a pilot project, though most of them are striving to
introduce digital technologies into their educational process. First of all, online courses are being
intensively mastered as new formats for transferring knowledge (Maslennikova, 2019).
    The preservation and development of students' health is not forgotten either. “Along with the
transition from a traditional physical learning environment to a virtual one and the formation of a
digital educational environment, the environment for the preservation and development of students'
health is changing. At the same time, it is even more important to regulate external access to this
environment, since it is not just personal data, but elements of building a person's physical, mental
and social well-being. " (Mukhametzyanov, 2019).
    “The relationship between teachers and their students is being increasingly mediated via
educational technologies. This increased use of technologies has implications for all levels of
education, perhaps most evident in a higher education context where students are spending less time
on campus and more time online than they did in the past” (Lodge, Jason & Kennedy, Gregor &
Lockyer, L., 2020).
    In light of this, it is necessary to define new approaches to the content of education, which consists
in training teachers of new generation, effectively working in the conditions of digitalization of
economy and society.

4. Methodology
   The leading research methods are methods of analysis, synthesis, and comparison. Research papers
published between 2015 and September 2020 which studied the impact of digital learning
environment on pupils and students, as well as educators and teachers were identified in the electronic
databases Scopus, Web of Science, and E-library. Key search terms included the following words:
preschool age, pupil, student, educator, teacher, digital learning environment. Papers published in
English in peer-reviewed journals, as well as an overview of social networks and forums discussing

                                                                                                        98
educational problems during the COVID-19 pandemic were considered by us if they provided data on
the experience of using distance learning at all levels of education.

5. Results
    We interviewed students and university teachers of the Institute of Psychology and Education of
Kazan Federal University and Kazan National Technical University named after A.N. Tupolev about
their attitude to the digitalization of the educational process.
    Though students of the Institute of Psychology and Education study at the Faculty of the
Humanities, and students of KNTU named after A.N. Tupolev study at faculties of technical
specialties, their answers were similar. In total 300 students (full-time and part-time) and university
teachers of the Institute of Psychology and Education of Kazan Federal University (hereinafter KFU)
and Kazan National Technical University named after A.N. Tupolev. The study was conducted from
April to October 2020.
    The majority of students have a positive attitude towards the fact that some disciplines and
modules were transferred to the digital space: “It is convenient for me when, for some reason, without
attending a lecture or seminar, I can use my personal office in my free time and read the content of the
lecture, complete the assignment", "It is more convenient for me to clarify some unclear things at
home once again after the lecture", "It’s better for me to study online", "In the "Discussion" tab, I can
ask those questions that I would hesitate to ask personally", "I work, so I can't always attend lectures,
and I like the opportunity to listen to them distantly."
    As for the teachers, they also (overwhelmingly) have a positive attitude to innovations: “Of course,
we take into account that this is an additional loading, but it is paid”, “It is convenient for me that
some questions that we did not have time (not enough hours for the discipline, in my opinion) to
discuss in the classroom, you can ask students to prepare as additional material; at the same time, I
can track the degree of views of the assignment and their implementation "," I can send video material
for students’ independent viewing", "Ailing students do not lag behind the group as they study
independently the material that the group analyzed at the lecture. "
    This form of educational process organization for the Master’s degree significantly changes the
nature of a university teacher; in particular, the university teacher needs to create a new
methodological support of the educational process using electronic and computer technologies, taking
into account the crucial role of independent work of master students (Buntova, 2019).
    Thus, digitalization in higher education and digital technologies can be used not only as a control
over the assimilation of transmitted knowledge, but also helps teachers to use a personality-oriented
approach to each student in this process.

6. Discussion
   At the moment, no one - neither the government, nor the Ministry of Education or the Ministry of
Science and Higher Education, nor local governments - can guarantee that they will not have to
switch to distance learning again. But those who, in the spring of 2020, experienced the possibilities
of distance learning and teaching in this format, have already accumulated some experience in
distance learning.
   Since the transition to the distance learning mode turned out to be very rapid, some teachers who
were not prepared for this activity, as well as pupils and students, along with their parents found
themselves in a stressful situation.
   Our survey involved yet teachers from preschool educational institutions, secondary and higher
schools, students and parents. Addressing students, in our opinion, gave us an opportunity to analyze
the participants of educational process, as being yesterday's schoolchildren, they are able to analyze
more systematically advantages and disadvantages of distance learning.
   A teacher of a preschool educational institution shared her experience of organizing classes with
preschoolers: “We were not ready for distance and home learning. When preschool educational
institutions (PEI) closed, parents began to ask to help children learn at home, but then we faced a new


                                                                                                      99
problem - the limited level of education and resources of about one third of parents, lack of access to
technologies, a good Internet connection.
    We analyzed the situation and discussed it with our colleagues, and then the administration of our
MBPEI decided to conduct educational activities using the WhatsApp messaging network. It took a
lot of effort for the staff of the preschool educational institution and preschoolers’ parents to organize
the work efficiently in the pandemic.
    To begin with, educators and specialists of the preschool educational institution revised, analyzed
and corrected all the teaching material that was available; they worked out a set of video lessons that
made the material more accessible and interesting both for children and their parents.
    The educator records a video lesson according to the calendar plan, and sends it to the WhatsApp
chat of the PEI group. Also, references to the literature on this video are sent to the WhatsApp chat to
help parents and pupils. After watching the material, pupils with their parents do some creative work.
We were lucky as all parents agreed with the suggested learning mode during self-isolation. To some
extent, self-isolation was good for the parents: they paid more attention to their children while
implementing joint work. In addition, all this had a positive effect on the status of a preschool
educator; we increasingly hear “thank you” addressed to us. At this stage, it was the most alternative
measure to ensure access to distance learning for everyone, including people with a low income,
because most of them do not have digital devices. "
    In turn, school teachers were unanimous when assessing the introduction of distance technologies
in the educational process of secondary schools: "The pandemic launched the active development of
online education; it definitely will be in demand in the future." Less than half of interviewed teachers
answered that they were able to independently master distance learning tools. They highly valued
their own level of digital literacy. A third of respondents rated their level of digital literacy as average
- they had to turn to training at webinars or ask for help from colleagues. However, there are those
who admit that they still experience difficulties in using services and programs for distance learning.
In order to compensate for the gaps in their knowledge regarding online learning, teachers are taking
or are going to take refresher courses in the near future.
    We analyzed the obtained experience of using such an environment and interaction with students,
interviewed students of two leading universities in the Republic of Tatarstan, and tried to specify
application features, advantages and disadvantages of using such an educational opportunity.
    The use of an electronic system, specialized programs for organizing and conducting video
conferencing (MS Teems, Meet, Zoom), specialized software platforms for creating and maintaining
training courses, registration and enrollment of students, their notification and automatic testing (LMS
Blackboard, IAS KFU), and reliable high-speed communication lines of Internet providers for all
educational process participants brings, at first glance, a unique opportunity for the teacher's instant
response to the learning process of a particular student in a cyclical mode: a didactic task - monitoring
the progress of its implementation - hint or explanation of logical and factual errors - monitoring and
evaluating the result; but each teacher has from a couple of dozen to a couple of hundred such
students in the course.
    However, a teacher, like any other person, due to the peculiarities of human perception and
thinking, can remember in detail no more than a dozen of such communication chains. Attempts to
simplify the process of communication during educational process by specifying typical errors do not
give the expected result, since the whole process of learning process automation is, in principle,
designed for “an ideally motivated, disciplined, responsible, having necessary theoretical basis student
with a stable psyche”. In fact, students, like ordinary people, are often lazy, worried, forget to follow
teacher's instructions, they have reasons that are more important (from their point of view) than the
process of planned educational work. They may not know something from the necessary theoretical
basis or be distracted due to other reasons. As a result, during discrete communication with a specific
student in such an environment (otherwise, it simply does not work out), the teacher either
unwittingly misses something, or constantly returns to the chain of records of his/her communication
with the student.
    Analysis of students’ learning success depending on their temperament and type of nervous system
showed that students with a strong type of nervous system and a high rate of inhibition (phlegmatic
and sanguine types) had the least problems when learning in a digital learning environment, while
choleric people have a little more problems. The melancholic people feel most uncomfortable at this

                                                                                                       100
mode of learning. Such educational process organization creates the largest number of problems for
them, and that is absolutely not taken into account by the training system, though the share of such
students is quite large [8, 9].
    The proctoring system has also proven itself well: assessment of students’ knowledge in an exam
or test includes the control of examinees’ answers independence.
    Thus, to present the information landscape of online learning in our republic, we also interviewed
parents of children studying in the format of distance learning: “It turns out that I do not know my
child enough and his/her abilities in educational activities”, “It is a hard time for modern teachers and
educators”, “I do not have enough knowledge of psychology and pedagogy of a modern child”,
“Something needs to be done with the existing educational program”.
    Summarizing interviewees’ answers, we can accentuate advantages and disadvantages of this
system of work with preschoolers, pupils, students and parents of pupils and students.
    The advantages include the following:
    - teachers, despite the new format of work with pupils and students, have found resources and
opportunities to organize the educational process in difficult conditions;
    - the opportunity to transfer part of the educational material to self-study mode; thorough
preparation for lessons;
    - the convenience of planning students’ own academic work, the opportunity to plan time and
place of work for teachers;
    - the use of proctoring in exams eliminates subjective assessment of students.
    The disadvantages are as follows:
    - negligent schoolchildren disrupted lessons; hooligan behaviour of some students was registered;
    - the lack of approved and time-tested methodological developments for online education, as well
as low digital literacy of older teachers;
    - a low level of students’ knowledge assimilation; time-consuming process for teachers;
    - available methods and means of students’ educational work monitoring (teachers’ record books
to register students’ learning results) and registration methods.

7. Conclusion
    The conducted research allows us to conclude that:
    1. The digital learning environment meets the peculiarities of one-to-one training or consultation.
It is less suitable for the formation of theoretical knowledge, but it is poorly adapted for the formation
of practical skills, and does not take into account motivational and psychophysiological characteristics
of a particular student.

8. References
[1] E.V. Buntova, Methodology for creating a master's program curriculum in the context of digital
    economy. Bulletin of Samara State Technical University. Series: Psychological and pedagogical
    sciences, 2019, pp. 20-36.
[2] E.A. Dyakova, Digitalization of education as the basis for teachers’ training in the 21st century:
    problems and solutions. Bulletin of Armavir State Pedagogical University, 2019, pp. 24-35
[3] M.      Kushnir,       Digital     Learning      Environment      Manifesto,      2015.     URL:
    http://manifesto.edutainme.ru/en
[4] J. Lodge, G. Kennedy, L. Lockyer, Digital learning environments, the science of learning and the
    relationship      between       the     teacher      and     the    learner,      2020.     URL:
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329544254
[5] V.Sh. Maslennikova, On the problem of cognitive modeling of educational activities in the
    context of digitalization in higher education. Bulletin of ChSPU named after Yakovlev, 2019, pp.
    134-140
[6] I. Sh. Mukhametzyanov, Digital Educational environment, health protecting aspects. J. Sib. Fed.
    Univ. Humanit. soc. sci., (2019), 12(9), 1670–1681. DOI: 10.17516/1997–1370– 0484


                                                                                                      101
[7] T.V. Nikulina, Informatization and digitalization of education: concepts, technologies,
    management. Pedagogical education in Russia, 2018, p. 107-113.
[8] Temperament – statistics. URL:https://testometrika.com/blog/features-of-temperament.
[9] Relationship of sociophobia and type of temperament in students 1-3 courses of PSMU, PSATU
    and PSU / Scientific journal European Journal of Natural History. URL: http://world-
    science.ru/en/article/view?id=34093




                                                                                          102