<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Exploiting Internet of Things for Business Process Improvement</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Christoph Stoiber</string-name>
          <email>christoph.stoiber@stud.uni-regensburg.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Regensburg, Institute of Information Systems</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Universitätsstraße 31, 93053 Regensburg</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2021</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>54</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>4724</fpage>
      <lpage>4734</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Companies are increasingly performing costly projects to exploit the value propositions associated with Internet of Things (IoT) applications. Therefore, efforts are made to integrate IoT into existing business processes aiming at beneficial Business Process Improvements (BPI). By implementing IoT technologies into certain processes, process entities can be connected, workflows can be automated, and the generated data can be utilized. However, the resulting research area of IoT-based BPI has only received little attention so far. This led to a scarcity of mature models and methods to facilitate a goal-oriented selection of appropriate IoT applications and its integration into existing business processes and information systems. The PhD Research Proposal at hand discusses arising challenges and existing research gaps regarding the exploitation of IoT for BPI and gives an overview on both relevant research questions and current and upcoming research.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Internet of Things</kwd>
        <kwd>Business Process Improvement</kwd>
        <kwd>Business Process Management</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The widespread of the Internet of Things (IoT) led to a great variety of different
applications in almost each sector of everyday life. With more than 34 billion IoT devices,
the number has more than tripled from 2012 to the year 2018 [Bu09]. IoT can be defined
as a network that connects uniquely identifiable things to the internet. Through the
exploitation of unique identification and sensing, information about the thing can be
collected and the state can be changed from anywhere, anytime, by anything [Mi15]. The
main idea therefore is the pervasive presence of things or objects, such as
RadioFrequency Identification (RFID) tags, sensors, actuators, or mobile phones, which can
interact and cooperate with each other [At10]. Especially industrial companies are
progressively using IoT technology for efficient management and controlling of industrial
processes and assets to increase productivity and reduce operational costs [Si18].
Integrating IoT can therefore positively influence, optimize, and even redesign processes.
The resulting Business Process Improvements (BPI) can be measured using Process
Performance Measures (PPM), which are mostly constituted as cost, quality, time, and
flexibility [Du18]. As the Devil’s Quadrangle theory states, that an improvement in one
PPM dimension almost inevitably results in a deterioration of another, BPI is mostly
focused on individual PPMs [RL05]. In contrast to incremental BPI achieved with
ordinary process redesign, IoT technology can fundamentally transform processes. Just a
recent study of Harmon and Garcis [HG20] shows that IoT reveals many extensive
possibilities for process improvement. The generation and use of comprehensive process
data in real time and the connection of process entities can be used to improve all types of
business processes and thus optimize value creation [Gi16]. An exemplary IoT application
with BPI reference is the retrofitting of propane gas vending machines operated by the
company Linde plc. Attaching sensors and installing a gateway, an edge device and
connecting the machine to the cloud via 3G technology enables beneficial BPI of many
kinds. For example, an improved authentication and authorization process of the customer
by connecting the vending machine with an ID reader is possible. Also process deviations
can be detected by installing sensors that recognize empty and full propane cylinders. In
addition, the process guidance for customers can be improved with a combination of
sensors and light bars that guide the customer during the return of empty cylinders and the
picking of new full cylinders. These BPI result in reduced processing time, improved
process quality, and less labor costs due to activity automation.</p>
      <p>The pressure on companies to integrate IoT technology is growing steadily, to the point
that companies, that don't adopt IoT, may not be competitive in the near future [Li17].
Although IoT is anticipated to have massive benefits for businesses, a survey of more than
500 business executives revealed, that 90% of organizations are remaining in the proof of
concept or even early-stage planning phases for IoT projects [Bo16]. This lack of IoT
application maturity stems from the fact, that adopting IoT technology and integrating it
into existing information systems is quite different compared to adopting other
technologies [Bo13], as IoT comprises multiple different technologies such as sensors,
communication protocols, or servers that can be highly complex to connect to existing
information systems. The efforts for integrating IoT strongly depend on already present
systems, such as Business Process Management Systems (BPMS), as well as ERP, MES,
or SCADA systems. Considering these factors, companies need to have an understanding
on how to integrate IoT technologies into their existing information systems. In addition,
expected value propositions and potential BPI areas must be clarified and illustrated to
motivate decision makers to integrate IoT. Furthermore, applicable methods and models
for selecting appropriate IoT technologies and applications need to be developed. The
research project illustrated in this PhD research proposal addresses these challenges by
investigating a set of interrelated research questions.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Research Questions</title>
      <p>The fact, that a successful implementation of IoT applications constitutes a major
challenge for many companies, testifies to the presence of hurdles and inhibition
thresholds. This necessitates an investigation of the research area of IoT-based BPI,
whereby three central research questions can be defined (see Table 1). At first, companies
must have a clear and realistic understanding of value propositions that can be associated
with IoT technology and how it could affect business processes. Secondly, companies
need to be supported at the selection phase for specific IoT technologies and applications</p>
      <p>Exploiting Internet of Things for Business Process Improvement 7
that fit the anticipated BPI goals and the underlying processes. Finally, the integration of
IoT technology into existing information systems and business process landscapes must
be facilitated. Therefore, companies must comprehend existing organizational and
technical requirements and be aware of their own maturity level regarding the integration
of IoT technology.</p>
      <p>RQ#</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Focus Area</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Research Question 1 2 3</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Propositions</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>Selection</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>Integration</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-6">
        <title>What beneficial BPI propositions can be expected from the</title>
        <p>integration of IoT?
Which methods can serve as a process-oriented decision basis
for selecting appropriate IoT applications and technologies?</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-7">
        <title>How can IoT be integrated into companies’ business processes and what are the requirements for enterprises?</title>
        <p>The first research question deals with value propositions of IoT applications and which
beneficial BPIs can be expected by adopting companies. It must be clearly elaborated to
what extend IoT can be exploited for BPI and what value propositions, fitting the
respective processes, can be anticipated by decision makers. The second research question
addresses the need for selection methods that support the decision on specific IoT
applications and technologies. There has been no research that addressed a structured
decision model for selecting IoT applications, which also considers anticipated process
improvement goals. Existing decision support models are mainly based on key learnings
from other industrial use cases or generic frameworks to build up an IoT strategy [Li12].
Moreover, there are only a few clues how a process should be transformed from the actual
to the target state [SS21a]. In practice, these decisions are left to the process owners
without structured guidelines [Fo06]. The third research question focuses on the
integration of IoT applications into existing information systems and business processes
including the requirements for adapting companies. Most companies already have matured
and sophisticated process landscapes and information systems that often prevent an easy
implementation of IoT technologies [SS17]. One inherent cause for this situation is the
need for IT systems to adapt to the flexible and near real-time continuous data flow that is
generated by IoT devices [BD10].
3</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Research Design and Roadmap</title>
      <p>The research project aims at elaborating the main topic of IoT-based BPI by addressing
each of the research questions individually. By eventually synthesizing the research
streams into a comprehensive contribution, the subject of effective and beneficial
exploitation of IoT for BPI will be illuminated. The different contributions will follow
distinct methodologies including literature reviews, surveys, and the design of models and
metamodels based on design science research (DSR) principles.
The first research question will be tackled in a bottom-up approach to derive actual value
propositions of IoT applications that originate from their integration into business
processes. Due to a comprehensive research cooperation with the Linde plc and insights
into the production processes of BHS Corrugated, existing IoT applications in several
business areas will be analysed with respect to BPI potentials. The goal is to unmask
generic value propositions of IoT and to investigate actual benefits that can be expected
by companies. This will be achieved by conducting surveys on relevant employees,
mapping existing value propositions with real instances, and analysing PPMs before and
after the implementation of IoT applications. In addition, the design and implementation
of further applications is being considered. A first set of processes have already been
selected that contain multiple IoT applications and can be used to analyse the actual impact
on PPMs.</p>
      <p>The second research question has already been partly addressed by designing a method
for deciding on specific IoT applications that incorporates desired BPI goals and considers
the underlying process details. In [SS21a] we proposed a structured decision model that
considers IoT application clusters, anticipated BPI goals, and details of the process where
the application should be implemented. At first, specific IoT application clusters were
developed by conducting an extensive literature review. These clusters were examined
regarding several characteristic such as their value propositions or technical aspects. Using
this information, an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model has been proposed, that
comprises the main objective, relevant BPI dimensions, and the formulated application
clusters. To validate the approach, the model was applied to a real-life business process.
Another publication, which is currently ongoing, addresses the design of an IoT-based BPI
pattern metamodel which enables the illustration of generic IoT application patterns. In
the context of enterprise and systems modelling, patterns describe a generic solution to a
problem that has been useful in one practical application and is likely to be useful in others
[Fo96]. Therefore, patterns can display all relevant IoT application elements such as the
underlying problem (or BPI goal), industry examples, performance indicators, or specific
characteristics of the technical solution. Figure 1 shows a draft of the metamodel that is
currently work in progress. The metamodel will be evaluated by illustrating several
specific IoT-based BPI patterns extracted from a literature review and the analysis of
actual applications of industrial companies. This will support decision makers with
investigating and selecting appropriate applications that tackle an existing challenge or
provide BPI possibilities.</p>
      <p>Exploiting Internet of Things for Business Process Improvement 9</p>
      <p>Fig. 1: IoT-based BPI Metamodel
For the third research question, an extensive literature review about Event-Driven
Business Process Management (EDBPM) has already been conducted focusing on its
capabilities to enable an effective integration of IoT technologies into business processes
[SS21b]. We provided a comprehensive survey on existing literature about EDBPM and
performed a clustering of main contributions to investigate the status quo. EDBPM
constitutes an interesting approach that combines two different disciplines, namely
Complex Event Processing (CEP) and BPM, to tackle the challenges of high-volume event
integration. This combination leads to a system that can deal with event-driven behaviour
and processes real-time data from distributed sources such as IoT devices [vAm08].
Another facet of the focus area raises the question, what requirements are needed to
integrate IoT into their processes and how companies can measure their fitness in this
regard. Concerning this question, a capability maturity model will be designed to assist
organizations in measuring their competencies regarding the implementation of IoT-based
BPI applications. As the kind of realizable BPIs and their corresponding costs highly
depend on the company’s culture, skills and competences, IT infrastructure, and other
criteria, a capability maturity assessment is necessary. This model will form an evaluative
and comparative basis for improvement as it will be designed in a prescriptive manner. To
follow a rigorous methodology, the model will be designed according to DSR principles
while incorporating an extensive Delphi study on industrial and academical experts.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Expected Outcomes</title>
      <p>This PhD research project is aimed at illuminating the research area of IoT-based BPI
including i) the investigation of value propositions, ii) the design of selection models, and
iii) the illustration of prerequisites for a successful integration. This comprehensive
approach is expected to provide a starting point for further research and concrete support</p>
      <p>Christoph Stoiber
for companies to facilitate the implementation of IoT projects. The inhibition threshold
for conducting IoT projects should be lowered and the probability of a successful project
execution may be increased by proposing an orientation and suitable toolset. As two
individual publications of the overall research project have already been accepted at
recognized conferences, the relevance of the research topic is given.
[At10]
[Bo13]
[Bo16]
[BD10]
[Bu09]
[Du18]
[Fo96]
[Fo06]
[Gi16]
[HG20]
[Li12]
[Li17]
[Mi15]
Boos, D., Guenter, H., Grote, G., Kinder, K.: Controllable accountabilities: the internet
of things and its challenges for organisations. Behaviour &amp; Information Technology
32(5), pp. 449-467, 2013.</p>
      <p>Bruns, R., Dunkel, J.: Event-Driven Architecture. Softwarearchitektur für
ereignisgesteuerte Geschäftsprozesse. Springer, Heidelberg, 2010.</p>
      <p>Burhan, M., Rehman, R., Khan, B., Kim, B.: IoT elements, layered architectures and
security issues: A comprehensive survey. Sensors 18(9), 2009.</p>
      <p>Dumas, M., Rosa, M., Medling, J., Reijers, H.: Fundamentals of Business Process
Management (ed.). Springer, Heidelberg, 2018.</p>
      <p>Forster, F.: The Idea behind Business Process Improvement: Toward a Business Process
Improvement Pattern Framework. BPTrends, April, pp. 1-13, 2006.</p>
      <p>Del Giudice, M.: Discovering the Internet of Things (IoT) within the business process
management: a literature review on technological revitalization. Business Process
Management Journal 22(2), 2016.</p>
      <p>Harmon, P., Garcis, J.: The State of the BPM Market. BPM Trends, 2020.</p>
      <p>Li, Y., Hou, M., Liu, H., Liu, Y.: Towards a theoretical framework of strategic decision,
supporting capability and information sharing under the context of internet of things.
Information Technology and Management 13(4), pp. 205-216, 2012.</p>
      <p>Liu, V.: Business Benefits of the Internet of Things: A Gartner Trend Insight Report.
Gartner Inc.
https://www.gartner.com/en/doc/3806366-business-benefits-of-theinternet-of-things-a-gartner-trend-insight-report, accessed: 10/11/2020.</p>
      <p>Minerva, R., Biru, A., Rotondi, D.: Towards a definition of the Internet of Things (IoT).
IEEE. https://iot.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/IEEE_IoT_Towards_Definition_Internet_of
_Things_Revision1_27MAY15.pdf, accessed: 23/11/2020.
[RL05]
[Si18]
[SS17]
[SS21a]
[SS21b]
[vAm08]</p>
      <p>Stoiber, C., Schönig, S.: Process-aware Decision Support Model for Integrating Internet
of Things Applications using AHP. To appear in: Proceedings of the 23rd International
Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), 2021.</p>
      <p>Stoiber, C., Schönig, S.: Event-Driven Business Process Management enhancing IoT –
a Systematic Literature Review and Development of Research Agenda. Proceedings of
the 16th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI), 2021.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reijers</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Liman</given-names>
            <surname>Mansar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>S.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Best practices in business process redesign: An overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics</article-title>
          .
          <source>Omega</source>
          ,
          <volume>33</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ), pp.
          <fpage>283</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>306</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ammon</surname>
            , R. von, Emmersberger,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Greiner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Springer,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Wolff</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            :
            <surname>Event-Driven Business Process</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Management</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems (DEBS)</source>
          ,
          <year>2008</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>