<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Using Network Science in Learning Analytics: Building Bridges towards a Common Agenda</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Oleksandra Poquet</string-name>
          <email>sasha.poquet@unisa.edu.au</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Bodong Chen</string-name>
          <email>chenbd@umn.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mohammed Saqr</string-name>
          <email>saqr@saqr.me</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Tobias Hecking</string-name>
          <email>tobias.hecking@dlr.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Centre for Change and Complexity in Learning (C3L), University of South Australia</institution>
          ,
          <country country="AU">Australia</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>German Aerospace Center</institution>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>University of Eastern Finland</institution>
          ,
          <country country="FI">Finland</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>University of Minnesota</institution>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Interest in using networks in the analysis of digital data has long existed in learning analytics (LA). Applications of network science in our field are diverse. Some researchers analyze social settings in online discussions, knowledge building software, and group formation tools. Others use networked techniques to capture epistemic and cognitive processes. Networked approaches have been pioneered for psychometrics, for the analysis of time-series data, and for various types of clustering of relational observations. Finally, modelling of variables where networks are used as representations of causal relations is also gaining traction. Given the diversity of the thematic foci that researchers engage in when applying network science to learning analytics, this workshop aims to identify common challenges experienced through the use of network science methodologies. The workshop will invite researchers working in the area to share their work and reflect on common challenges. We envision themes of causality, linkage between micro- and macro-processes, use of time and space, elements of generalizability and validity to surface in the group discussions. The workshop aims to gather LA scholars to collectively build a solid foundation of advanced network modeling of learning data and shape strategies of future work in this important sub-field of LA.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Workshop Background</title>
      <p>
        Social network analysis and its sister area of network science is widely used in learning analytics
(LA). When positioned within a broader context, LA’s focus on quantification of social interactions
using digital data is not surprising. Early 2000s were characterized by the wider adoption of the web
2.0 in educational technology, and distance education pedagogies where these technologies were used,
have always emphasized learner-to-learner interactions. Moreover, higher education literature referred
to the outcomes of social interactions, such as social capital and the sense of belonging, as essential for
student retention [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. In K-12 schools, network analysis has been used to examine racial segregation in
schools and further seek ways to support academic success of students from disadvantaged community
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3">2,3</xref>
        ]. As a result, analyzing networks has been applied in a range of contexts: university online courses,
MOOCs, social text- and video-annotation scenarios, as well as informal learning settings [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
Capturing learner interactions as network representations also potentially could be used for reflection
and visualization of social dynamics in online course forums in LA dashboards.
      </p>
      <p>
        Examples of empirical work analyzing social dynamics in socio-technical networks are diverse,
including identification of network structures in different technological and pedagogical contexts;
inquiry into the relationship of individual SNA metrics with performance and learning-related
outcomes; clustering learners based on relational activities; examining learner positioning in relation to
other indicators; detection of learner communities; modelling processes generating online learner
networks; demonstrating group-level epistemic views, among others. However, analysis of social
dynamics in socio-technical environments is not the only area of application for network science in
learning analytics. As sophistication of computational approaches and collected data grew, so did the
use of networks' scientific methodologies. The problems that can be studied using a network lens are as
diverse as the contexts where they are applied, and far from uniform. Recent adoption of epistemic
network analysis and growth of mixed methods in networked methods in one of the EARLI SIGs is just
one example. Researchers in NetSci community also use network-related methods to model individual
cognition, mental scheme networks, and language networks using common lexicon [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. These network
techniques broadly capture epistemic and cognitive processes for collective and individual systems,
groups and individuals. Networked approaches have recently been adopted for the analysis of
finegrained time series data, and pioneered in psychometrics, as models combining various variables
contributing to individual states [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. Finally, modelling of variables, using networks as representations
of causal models is also gaining traction.
      </p>
      <p>Given the diversity of thematic foci that researchers engage in when applying network science to
learning analytics, this workshop aims to help researchers identify common challenges in their work,
through the use of network science methodologies. The workshop will invite researchers working in
the area to both share their work and reflect on common challenges. We envision themes of causality,
linkage between micro- and macro-processes, use of time and space, as well as elements of
generalizability and validity to surface in the group discussions. We envision this conversation to
broadly evolve around best practices for operationalization of models that apply network scientific
techniques and common research questions that fundamentally build on the complexity science
approaches to modelling various systems (e.g. individual cognition, group cognition, epistemic
structure, system dynamics, etc.).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Workshop Objectives</title>
      <p>The workshop objectives are three-fold: to explore the application of advanced network analysis and
modeling to learning data; to engage in discussion around the use of network science; and to identify
common pain points that we collectively can work on. We hope to identify common areas that need
improvement (framework for reporting results in network studies) that can align research efforts. This
is a researcher-oriented community-building workshop; the underlying goal is to enable space for
researchers using network science to share and engage with one another, as a sub-community leading
the development of this area. Submissions for the workshop will include short empirical papers,
conceptual papers, and work-in-progress. They will be peer-reviewed.
3. References</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dawson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. “</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A study of the relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community”</article-title>
          .
          <source>The Internet and Higher Education</source>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ):
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>153</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>162</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zirkel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          “
          <article-title>What will you think of me? Racial integration, peer relationships and achievement among white students and students of color</article-title>
          .
          <source>” Journal of Social Issues</source>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          :
          <volume>60</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>57</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>74</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Farmer-Hinton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Social capital and college planning: Students of color using school networks for support and guidance (</article-title>
          <year>2008</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Education and Urban Society</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1177/0013124508321373
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hoppe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H. U.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Computational methods for the analysis of learning and knowledge building communities</article-title>
          . in: C.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wise</surname>
            , Siemens,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gasevic</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Handbook of learning analytics</article-title>
          ,
          <source>SoLAR</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>23</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>33</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Siew</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wulff</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. U.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Beckage</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kenett</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y. N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Cognitive network science: A review of research on cognition through the lens of network representations, processes, and dynamics</article-title>
          .
          <source>Complexity</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marsman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Borsboom</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kruis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Epskamp</surname>
            , S., van Bork,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Waldorp</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , ... &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>An introduction to network psychometrics: Relating Ising network models to item response theory models</article-title>
          .
          <source>Multivariate behavioral research</source>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ):
          <volume>53</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>15</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>35</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>