=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-2879/paper19 |storemode=property |title=The potential of Google Classroom web service for lecturers of higher educational establishments under pandemic conditions |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2879/paper19.pdf |volume=Vol-2879 |authors=Leila Yu. Sultanova,Oksana P. Tsiuniak,Liudmyla O. Milto,Maryna O. Zheludenko,Lyudmyla M. Lyktei,Larisa M. Petrenko,Aleksandr D. Uchitel }} ==The potential of Google Classroom web service for lecturers of higher educational establishments under pandemic conditions== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2879/paper19.pdf
The potential of Google Classroom web service for
lecturers of higher educational establishments under
pandemic conditions
Leila Yu. Sultanova1 , Oksana P. Tsiuniak2 , Liudmyla O. Milto3 ,
Maryna O. Zheludenko4 , Lyudmyla M. Lyktei2 , Larisa M. Petrenko5 and
Aleksandr D. Uchitel6
1
  Ivan Ziaziun Institute of Pedagogical Education and Adult Education of the National Academy of Educational Sciences
of Ukraine, 9 M. Berlynskoho Str., Kyiv, 04060, Ukraine
2
  Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 57 Shevchenka Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
3
  National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, 9 Pyrohova Str., Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine
4
  National Aviation University, 1 Liubomyra Huzara Str, Kyiv, 03058, Ukraine
5
  University of Educational Management, 52-A Sichovykh Striltsiv Str., Kyiv, 04053, Ukraine
6
  State University of Economics and Technology, 5 Stepana Tilhy Str., Kryvyi Rih, 50006, Ukraine


                                         Abstract
                                         Researches and publications on using Google Classroom web service for lecturers of higher educational
                                         establishments under pandemic conditions are analysed. The current state of higher education under
                                         pandemic conditions is characterised. Features of Google Classroom web service have been identified.
                                         The methodical development for lecturers of higher educational establishments “Potential of using
                                         Google Classroom web service” is described. Criteria and levels of using Google Classroom web service
                                         are defined. Initial diagnostic of the levels of using Google Classroom web service was conducted. During
                                         the diagnostic was revealed that most respondents have insufficient levels of theoretical knowledge and
                                         practical skills. In order to increase the level of using Google Classroom web service, the methodological
                                         development was implemented. As a result, positive dynamics in the levels of theoretical knowledge and
                                         practical skills of using Google Classroom web service was revealed. The effectiveness of the obtained
                                         results was confirmed by Fisher’s criterion.

                                         Keywords
                                         Google Classroom web service, cloud technologies, educational process, distance education, higher
                                         educational establishment, pandemic, COVID-19, lecturers of higher educational establishments




CTE 2020: 8th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education, December 18, 2020, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine
" leilasultanova22.07@gmail.com (L. Yu. Sultanova); tsiuniak33@gmail.com (O. P. Tsiuniak); miltolo@ukr.net
(L. O. Milto); maryna.zheludenko@ukr.net (M. O. Zheludenko); L.liktej@ukr.net (L. M. Lyktei);
laravipmail@gmail.com (L. M. Petrenko); o.d.uchitel@i.ua (A. D. Uchitel)
 0000-0002-3324-6926 (L. Yu. Sultanova); 0000-0002-4573-1865 (O. P. Tsiuniak); 0000-0001-5454-7085 (L. O. Milto);
0000-0003-2992-9481 (M. O. Zheludenko); 0000-0001-7348-4286 (L. M. Lyktei); 0000-0002-7604-7273 (L. M. Petrenko);
0000-0002-9969-0149 (A. D. Uchitel)
                                       © 2020 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
                                       Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
    CEUR
    Workshop
    Proceedings
                  http://ceur-ws.org
                  ISSN 1613-0073
                                       CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)



                                                                                                        346
1. Introduction
The pandemic of 2020 is a global phenomenon of the 21st century caused by the COVID-19
viral spreading [1]. The pandemic of 2020 has affected absolutely all forms of human interaction
and cooperation [2, 3, 4, 5, 6], including higher education [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. On the one hand,
higher education is facing new challenges, and on the other, new opportunities have emerged.
Due to introduction of quarantine in Ukraine, the educational process in higher educational
establishments is carried out remotely [12, 13]. Some higher educational establishments have
successfully practiced distance learning before quarantine [14, 15, 16, 17]. However, most of the
main activities were carried out in full-time and/or part-time study mode. Under such conditions
of the extreme mode of the higher education system operation during the first months of the
pandemic web services for education became especially relevant.
   The relevance of using web services in higher education lies in the fact that information
technologies not only serve as a tool used to solve specific pedagogical issues, but also add
variety to the forms of organization of the educational process, promote the formation of skills
of independent learning, stimulate the development of the educational process itself.
   A free web service for distance learning Google Classroom combines the following services:
Drive, Docs, Gmail, Calendar, etc. and is one of the effective means of solving educational issues
[18, 19, 20, 21].
   The purpose of the research is to substantiate theoretically and prove experimentally the effec-
tiveness of the methodological development for lecturers of higher educational establishments
“Potential of using Google Classroom web service”.
   According to the purpose of the research the following objectives are defined:
   1. To analyse researches and publications on the defined issue.
   2. To describe the current state of higher education under pandemic conditions.
   3. To identify the features of Google Classroom web service.
   4. To describe the methodological development for lecturers of higher educational establish-
      ments “Potential of using Google Classroom web service”.
   5. To define the criteria and levels of using Google Classroom web service.
   6. To prove experimentally the effectiveness of the suggested methodological development.

  Research methods:
    • general scientific methods: analysis, synthesis, comparison, systematization and gener-
      alization for studying the works of foreign and domestic scientists, legislative support,
      etc.;
    • specific scientific methods: interpretations to determine the basic concepts of the study,
      prognostic analysis to determine the prospects for further researches;
    • empirical methods: a conversation was used to identify problems in work of lecturers of
      higher educational establishments related to using Google Classroom web service under
      pandemic conditions; a survey was used to identify levels of using Google Classroom
      web service; method of pedagogical experiment was used to study the effectiveness
      of the described and implemented methodological development for teachers of higher
      educational establishments “Potential of using Google Classroom web service”;



                                               347
    • statistical methods: Fisher‘s criterion is used in order to prove the reliability of the
      obtained results.


2. Theoretical background
2.1. Analysis of researches and publications on the issue
In order to substantiate the relevance of the study, the authors studied scientific papers that
reveal general aspects of using information environments in education, building a single public
environment for providing electronic educational services, creating a system of electronic
monitoring of the educational process, etc.
   The conceptual principles of the cloud-oriented environment at different levels of education
are reflected in the researches of Olga V. Bondarenko [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29], Valerii Yu.
Bykov [30], Olena H. Kuzminska [31, 32, 33], Maiia V. Marienko [34, 35, 36], Oksana M. Markova
[37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42], Nataliia V. Morze [43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49], Yurii V. Tryus [50], Mariia P.
Shyshkina [51, 52, 53], whose works are devoted to the theoretical foundations of designing
and using cloud technologies in education. The authors pay considerable attention to the trends
of web services and identify advantages and disadvantages of their use in education.
   Thus, Mariia Shyshkina and Maiia Popel [54, 55] defined the concept of “cloud-oriented
environment” of an educational establishment, identified the main stages of its formation,
analysed the content of educational and scientific components of the cloud-oriented educational
and scientific environment. Under cloud technologies, most scientists consider an available way
to access external computing information resources in the form of services provided through
the Internet. A network of interconnected remote servers is a so-called “cloud”.
   Tetiana A. Vakaliuk [56] and Kateryna P. Osadcha [57] developed methods of teaching with
the use of cloud technologies; prospects for introduction of cloud computing into educational
establishments are reflected in the works of Lesya V. Bulatetska [58], Ihor V. Hevko [59], Nataliia
V. Valko [60], Hanna B. Varina [61]; Nataliia V. Soroko [62, 63] researched a foreign experience
in using cloud computing for teachers’ professional development; Nadiia P. Kozachenko [64],
Iryna S. Mintii [65, 66, 67] and Pavlo P. Nechypurenko [68] consider the issues of creating
training courses in the Moodle environment on the basis of cloud computing technology and
the possibility of their implementation in the educational activities of pedagogical universities.
   Creating a cloud-oriented learning environment of an educational institution is examined
in the works of Svitlana H. Lytvynova [69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74], who suggested the concept
of “cloud-oriented learning environment”, identified its components, objects, technologies
of interaction, distinguished levels of interaction within such environment, as well as stages,
methodological approaches, development principles and developed a methodology for designing
a cloud-oriented learning environment.
   It is worth noting that most scientists define cloud computing as tools to support learning,
i.e. interpret this notion according to the definition suggested by experts from the US National
Institute of Standards and Technology, who noted that cloud computing is a model of providing
convenient access according to the user’s need, regardless of its location and time of access
to computing resources (networks, servers, storage systems, databases, services, etc.), which




                                                  348
can be provided quickly and with minimal efforts of management and interaction with the IT
services provider.
   The expediency and necessity of ICT tools introduction on the basis of cloud technologies
in Ukraine is declared at the state level and reflected in the national project “Open World”
(2010–2014), in the Strategy of Information Society Development of Ukraine for 2013–2020,
which provides the formation of modern information infrastructure based on cloud technologies.
   Thus, the attention of both researchers all over the world researchers of web services is
focused mainly on the issues of forming cloud-oriented informational and educational, learning,
educational and scientific environment of higher educational establishments, creating infor-
mation space, innovative educational IT environment of educational establishments based on
Microsoft Office 365 cloud services as tools for organizing the educational process.
   However, the potential of Google Classroom web service for lecturers of higher educational
establishments under pandemic conditions has not been explored. Thus, the urgency of the
chosen issue, its insufficient theoretical development and inconsistency of practical implemen-
tation in higher educational establishments under pandemic conditions determined the choice
of the topic of the research.

2.2. Characteristics of the current state of higher education under pandemic
     conditions
Today education is becoming a continuous process that allows a person to navigate information
flow, to feel comfortable in the information society, to adapt easy to continuous technical
innovations.
   According to Olena Hrashchuk, “education is a strategic resource of socio-economic, cultural
and spiritual development of society, improvement of the welfare of population, ensuring
national interests, strengthening international prestige, forming a positive image of the country,
strengthening its competitiveness on the international stage, creating conditions for human
self-realization” [75].
   The study “Rethinking Education in the Digital Age”, conducted by the European Parliament
in 2020, states that the rethinking of education in the digital age should become a central issue
for modern politicians for two reasons:
    • firstly, only education can form a skilled workforce, ready for future profession and
      changeable labour market. Therefore, rethinking education in the digital age is a prereq-
      uisite for future global competitiveness of Europe;
    • secondly, only education can provide the preconditions for social integration and equality;
      participation of the European citizens in digital democracy [19].

   Thus, rethinking education in the digital age is important for protection the European values
such as equality, democracy and the rule of law.
   In 2019, the staff of Ivan Zyazyun Institute of Pedagogical and Adult Education (Ukraine)
conducted an online questionnaire of lecturers concerning the use of network technologies
in professional activities. The results of the questionnaire showed that all respondents (185
people (100%)) use a personal computer (PC) and the Internet in their professional activities.
However, 7.0% of respondents use mobile devices that do not have the ability to connect to the



                                               349
Internet, which significantly limits the work with files located in cloud storage. The majority
of respondents (85.9%) work on a PC with the Windows operating system, and 14.0% work on
two or more PCs with different operating systems. Five applications of the seven listed are
used by respondents in professional activities: Word (100%), PowerPoint (78.3%), Excel (71.3%),
OneDrive (21.6%), OneNote (7.0%)). Respondents do not use Sway and Outlook applications.
14.3% of respondents use other applications. It should be noted that the questionnaire involved
people from 21 and over 60 years. This means that using digital technologies is relevant in
professional activities regardless of age.
   Digital technologies have become especially relevant during the pandemic, as there were
some difficulties with the introduction of distance learning.
   The first problem is related to the technical support of both lecturers and students. Lack
or improper state of computer equipment, the Internet (for example in rural areas) make it
impossible to apply distance education. Another problem is software. Even with necessary
technical equipment, software installation for distance education is difficult for users. These
problems need to be addressed as a matter of priority. But, as it turned out, these are not
the main problems of distance education. In our opinion, the problem of methodical training
of lecturers for distance education under pandemic conditions is also important. Distance
education requires special training of lecturers because teaching methods that are suitable for
full-time education are not suitable for distance one. Therefore, often all classes are held in the
form of a monologue by lecturer and independent work by a student. Resolving this issue is an
urgent problem.
   However, for teachers, distance education has a number of advantages and they are quite
significant. This is an opportunity to improve skills online (saving time and money, especially
when it comes to foreign internships, training, etc.), an opportunity to reach a larger audience
during conferences, webinars, etc., an opportunity to hold joint meetings of departments,
councils, etc. and quickly resolve organizational and other issues. In addition, the introduction
of cloud technologies into educational process of university provides: efficient use of educational
space, as there is no need to allocate separate and specially equipped premises for traditional
computer classes; qualitatively different level of gaining modern knowledge, students have an
opportunity to be involved in educational process at any time and in any place, where there is
the Internet; an ability to create quickly, adapt and replicate educational services during the
educational process; an opportunity for students to provide feedback to a lecturer by evaluating
and commenting on the offered educational services.
   As a result, digital technologies have become an integral part of the higher education system.
The technical capabilities of digital technologies together with the creative and intellectual
potential of lecturers allow to raise education to a new level that meets the demands of modern
society.

2.3. Features of Google Classroom web service
Today, lecturers and students have access to many competing sources: digital educational
resources, curricula, online courses and various online services, etc. In our study, we suggest
analysing the potential of Google Classroom web service.
  Google Classroom is a unique Google application designed specifically for educational pur-



                                               350
poses. Google Classroom web service performs functions of methodological, software, technical,
informational and organizational environment.
   The active use of Google Classroom, which has existed since 2014, began at the time, when
educational establishments on a nation-wide and world-wide scale were forced to stop the
process of face-to-face learning. The statistics on using Google Classroom during coronavirus
are quite convincing. According to BBC News, as of March 30, 2020, the number of downloads
was more than 50 million, but until March 2000 Google Classroom was not even in the top 100
educational applications.
   The main goal of Google Classroom service, which has an interface in 38 languages, is to
optimize and ensure the efficiency of the educational process. Google Classroom web service
does not require special software. The attractiveness of this service is also its non-commercial
basis and lack of advertising.
   In Google Classroom, lecturers can easily create and check tasks, mark, comment and organize
effective communication in real time or in distance learning mode. In addition, Google Classroom
provides a user-friendly interface for creating and managing training courses, organizing project
activities and has great educational potential.
   We consider that the main advantages of the cloud technology are high speed data processing,
availability from any personal device, data storage on the network, including Google Drive, great
potential, educational process management, control and correction of results, data accumulation,
etc. It is important to have access to our own materials from any place in the world, to keep
information up-to-date, and to expand the opportunities for learning at home.
   However, for objectivity of valuation of Google Classroom web service capabilities one should
notes its disadvantages. The main disadvantage of the service is the constant need to be on the
Internet to work as well as inconvenience of creation of test tasks; lack of ability to check oral
assignments (in particular, in the process of learning a foreign language, where oral speech
is one of the key skills); lack of real-time communication and lack of a webinar room; lack of
possibility to join participants of educational process after the beginning of courses; lack of
opportunity to create separate groups within one course; lack of electronic gradebook in the
open version of Google Classroom (for corporate users this feature is provided); limited number
of participants – 250 people.
   In general, all available technical capabilities of the service provide the formal side of learn-
ing, while the creative and intellectual potential of a lecturer and a student often remains
undiscovered.

2.4. Methodical development “Potential of using Google Classroom web
     service” for lecturers of higher educational establishments under
     pandemic conditions
The Google Classroom web service is a tool for organizing distance learning, project activities in
higher educational establishments. All one needs to work with Google Classroom is to connect
to the Internet or a browser. Lecturers and students of higher educational establishments, who
have personal Google Accounts can use Classroom for free. The only condition is to register
your own mailbox in Gmail and get an access key. Google Classroom supports new versions of
major browsers depending on their updating. There are no problems with access from mobile



                                                351
devices based on Android and Apple iOS that is especially convenient for most students, who
actively use smartphones. The service is secure because there is no advertising and students’
materials and information are not used for advertising purposes.
   With the help of Google Classroom, a lecturer can create training courses and add students,
share educational and methodological materials, create tasks, check the level of students’
knowledge, organize thematic discussions. After activating a function “create class”, a lecturer
must set up the basic settings: class name; course description; room, etc. At this stage, each
class is given a unique code by which students can find it and gain an access.
   The next step is to set the options that will be provided for students. Depending on the form
of students’ activity provided by a lecturer within the class, one can give them an opportunity
to publish posts, make comments, etc. Everyone, who joins the class is displayed in the list
of students. However, there is a certain disadvantage, which is that students use nicknames
instead of real names in the registration form. That is why sometimes it is difficult to find a
student on the list. This disadvantage can be easily corrected by creating a culture of business
communication, in which using fictitious names is inappropriate. At the end of the semester,
one can delete the list of students and create a new one, the content of the course remains.
   When working with a web service, a lecturer should pay attention to the sections “Stream”,
“Classwork”, “People”, “Marks”. The Stream tab in the Google Classroom app displays tasks
and posts related to the course (discipline). To work with the task, a lecturer can give brief
instructions on how to work with it, topic, deadline, attach a task template (add from Google
Drive) and choose it for students. The algorithm of actions, when “creating a task” is the
following one.
   On the classroom desktop, we choose “Classwork” section. Users will see a list of tasks, which
is marked as “+ Create”: assignments, quiz assignments, questions, material, reuse post, topic.
It is recommended to group objects in this feed by topic. Also, in the application there is a
possibility of their arrangement in a convenient order for lecturers and students. For example, a
lecturer plans to add educational content (lecture). He can easily download it. Students will
receive a notification in the form of a message about updates and access to educational materials.
   When creating a task – select the buttons “Create” “Assignments”.
   A window will open, in which you need to enter the title of the task, instructions for its
performance, add material or create it.
   When you click on the button “Add”, there is a transition, which suggests a location of the
folder for material attachment: from Google Drive, Links, File, YouTube.
   The user can select the button “+ Create”, which suggests several options for creating a task
in the form of: Docs, Slides, Sheets, Drawings, Forms.
   After receiving an assignment, a student processes it, selects the section “Perform”, adds or
creates a document and opens it. The name of the opened file will indicate name, surname
of the student and the title of the assignment, which a lecturer has prepared in advance. The
student answers the assignments, performs test tasks and clicks the button “Mark as done”. If
the whole algorithm is performed correctly – the status “Submitted” appears, after checking –
“Checked” and “Marked”, for example: 4/5, 90/100, 186/200.
   At the same time, lecturers have an opportunity to mark, comment and organize effective
communication in real time or in distance learning mode. Here is an example of using Google
Classroom in classes on the subject “Pedagogical Innovation Studies”, which is studied by higher



                                               352
education students on specialty 013 Primary Education of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National
University. Since the educational course is aimed at forming a creative personality of the future
teacher, who is professionally developing within the conditions of new Ukrainian education,
it is necessary to teach future professionals to navigate in different systems, technologies,
methods, adequately evaluate them, make optimal choices in the way of implementing author’s
innovative technologies in the educational process of the New Ukrainian School. For example,
we suggest students to write argumentative essays on educational topics (“Morning Meetings at
the New Ukrainian School: what is it and for what reason?”, “Development of critical thinking of
students in the context of interactive learning”, “In Order to Think Critically, Students Must:...?”;
essays (“Educational Establishment of My Dream”, “Online Education: Pros and Cons”), prepare
scientific reports (“Digital Literacy of Primary School Teachers”, “Elements of STEM-Education
in Primary School”), make a plan of integrated lessons. Students also receive links to videos
(video lessons) posted on YouTube.
   Example of assignment with link to videos:
   Task: Watch the video. Answer the questions:
    • Is the teacher‘s algorithm effective during explaining new material?
    • What forms of work does the teacher use in class?
    • Are the used forms of work effective during studying the topic?
    • Has the goal of the lesson been achieved?
   This allows to visualize a particular material, a student not only processes the content, as
when working with the text, he can analyse an information context, an emotional presentation
and perception of information.
   The described experience of approbation of the suggested methodical development proves
that Google Classroom web service allows to use in educational process actual video materials
by placing assignments with a link to video. This contributes to the visualization and individual-
ization of the educational process. Communication becomes more productive, because students
can view topic materials, videos and photos before the lecture. The most important is the fact
that implementation of the development promotes more effective communication between
lecturer and students, does not require special conditions for studying (the use of multimedia
classrooms, additional equipment), and exchange of comments and questions becomes possible
before the meeting and motivates students to classroom activities.
   Using Google Classroom web service during practical classes allows a lecturer to make
interactive control over tasks performance. A combination of opportunities to comment on
tasks and the service “Announcements” simplifies students’ work with individual assignments.
Google Classroom simplifies task verification. Google Classroom allows one to make student’s
gradebook as a separate Google Docs document. An additional convenience of using Google
Classroom in the learning process is that a lecturer can specify deadline for task performance,
providing higher scores for its timely completion and lower for late one.
   It is advisable to pay attention to the fact that working in Google Classroom is an important
requirement to place materials on topics, blocks, modules. Experience shows that insufficiently
structured information only overloads students and does not produce the proper learning effect.
The term of the task is indicated by the lecturer, but the service itself controls timely/untimely
performance.



                                                353
2.5. Criteria and levels of use of Google Classroom web service
The described above methodical development was suggested to lecturers of The National
Pedagogical Dragomanov University (Ukraine), National Aviation University (Ukraine) and Vasyl
Stefanyk Precarpathian National University (Ukraine) for use in professional activities under
pandemic conditions. Since the quality of using Google Classroom web service is an important
issue in the professional activities of lecturers, it was considered necessary to determine the
criteria for effective using Google Classroom web service.
   The criteria determining allows one to obtain qualitative and quantitative indicators of the
studied process or phenomenon. A criterion is a feature on the basis of which evaluation,
distinguishing or classification are carried out. Only in the presence of criteria it is possible to
draw a conclusion about desirable, the best results of pedagogical influence.
   Taking into account the features of Google Classroom web service, we have defined the
following criteria for its effective use: the level of theoretical knowledge about Google Classroom
web service and the level of practical skills of using Google Classroom web service.
   Theoretical knowledge about Google Classroom web service. Studying the theoretical foun-
dations of using Google Classroom web service will help to form a holistic view of the essence
of this web service and determine necessary conceptual and categorical apparatus. Theoretical
knowledge of Google Classroom web service is the basis for effective professional practice
that can be properly directed, updated, and improved. Thus, in order to involve use of Google
Classroom web service in professional activity of lecturers, it is necessary to comprehend it in
theoretical categories.
   The basic knowledge that a lecturer must gain in the process of mastering Google Classroom
web service can be combined into two groups: knowledge of the essence of Google Classroom
web service and knowledge of the specifics of the educational process using Google Classroom
web service.
   It is appropriate to determine the level of lecturers’ mastering theoretical knowledge about
Google Classroom web service using a control method. We consider method of written control,
which consists in making a questionary, the most convenient one.
   Practical skills of using Google Classroom web service. The effectiveness of lecturers’ profes-
sional activities depends, among other things, on skills and abilities required for successful use
of Google Classroom web service.
   The level of use of Google Classroom web service depends on availability of the following
skills: the ability to create a Gmail Account, create your own class/course, and invite students to
the class; provide students with a class/course access code; publish information in the “stream”,
i.e. in the information line; download assignments (or create a test); check tasks and mark, etc.
   The defined criteria of the effectiveness of using Google Classroom web service (theoretical
knowledge of Google Classroom web service; practical skills of using Google Classroom web
service) made it possible to distinguish their levels.
   It should be noted that there are at least two main classifications to determine expressiveness
of particular object in pedagogy: by number of features and level of development. The latter
classification is characterized by differences not only in components but in their degrees of
expression (degrees of formation).
   This classification is based on matrix analysis (a method of studying relationships using



                                                354
matrix models, which is based on the mathematical theory of matrices). The essence of this
analysis is that from a set of factors, parameters and other important characteristics of the
system, the two most important are selected, and the characteristic of the system that should be
determined, is considered as a function of these two variables. Using two variables, one can
clearly present the result of the analysis in the form of a table (matrix) or in graphical form.
   Thus, the effectiveness of using (EU) the Google Classroom, as we noted, is determined by
two criteria: theoretical knowledge of the Google Classroom (TK); practical skills of using
Google Classroom web service (PS). Thus, the efficiency of using Google Classroom web service
corresponds to formula 1.

                                EU Google Classroom = TK + PS                                   (1)
  Kindly note that each criterion has the indicators, which are described above. Therefore,
these indicators are a priori included in the criteria. Further, for each of these two parameters,
we introduce two degrees of expressiveness that are levels of use of the Google Classroom web
service (insufficient and sufficient).
  Thus, having two criteria for effectiveness of using Google Classroom web service (theoretical
knowledge about Google Classroom web service and practical skills of using Google Classroom
web service) and two degrees of their expression (insufficient and sufficient) one gets 2 × 2
matrix and, accordingly, 4 options of effectiveness of using Google Classroom web service:

   1. Sufficient level of theoretical knowledge and sufficient level of practical skills.
   2. Sufficient level of theoretical knowledge and insufficient level of practical skills.
   3. Insufficient level of theoretical knowledge and sufficient level of practical skills.
   4. Insufficient level of theoretical knowledge and insufficient level of practical skills.

  The matrix simultaneously takes into account all possible options for using Google Classroom
web service, which provide the presence of two criteria for possible two levels of each criterion.
  This matrix allows one to see the prevailing criterion for using Google Classroom web service.


3. Experimental verifying the effectiveness of the
   methodological development for lecturers of higher
   educational establishments under pandemic conditions
   “Potential of using Google Classroom web service”
To prove the effectiveness of the described and implemented methodological development, we
used a pedagogical experiment.
  The study was conducted on the basis of the National Pedagogical Dragomanov University
(Ukraine), National Aviation University (Ukraine) and Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National
University (Ukraine), where the methodological development was introduced, and provided
three stages:
  The first stage is the initial diagnostic of the levels of using Google Classroom web service.




                                               355
  The second stage is introduction of the methodological development for lecturers of higher
educational establishments under pandemic conditions “Potential of using Google Classroom
web service”.
  The third stage is control diagnostic of the levels of using Google Classroom web service.
  The experiment covered 87 teachers of higher educational establishments.
  In order to determine the levels of using Google Classroom web service, the following have
been developed:

    • a questionnaire to determine the level of theoretical knowledge about web services (in
      particular Google Classroom);
    • a questionnaire to determine the level of practical skills in using Google Classroom web
      service.

   These uniquely designed questionnaires allowed us to analyse the levels of using Google
Classroom web service, describe the state of the problem and describe the methodological
development for lecturers of higher educational establishments under pandemic conditions
“Potential of using Google Classroom web service”. For objectiveness during the questionnaire,
a representative sample of respondents was formed, a formalized induction procedure was used,
and the anonymity of the answers was ensured.
   The author’s questionnaire for determining the level of theoretical knowledge about web
services (in particular Google Classroom) consisted of 10 questions. All questions had multiple
choice answers. Two or more correct answers had to be chosen for certain questions.
   For each correct answer 1 point was awarded. Then, the total number of points was calculated
(5–10 points made up sufficient level of theoretical knowledge; 0–4 points made up insufficient
level of theoretical knowledge).
   In order to determine the levels of practical skills of using Google Classroom web service,
respondents were asked to perform uniquely developed 5 practical tasks. The level of practical
skills was assessed as follows: correctly completed two tasks out of five indicated insufficient
level of practical skills; three or more correctly completed tasks indicated sufficient level of
practical skills.
   At the first stage of pedagogical experiment in March 2020, lecturers of higher educational
establishments under pandemic conditions were invited to take online entrance diagnostic of
the levels of using Google Classroom web service.
   Generalized results of determining levels of theoretical knowledge and practical skills of
control and experimental groups are presented in table 1.
   The analysis of the answers showed that some questions made difficulties for lecturers.
   In particular, the majority of 56 lecturers (64.3%) did not know that Google Classroom service
can be used for distance education. Almost all respondents – 81 people (93.1%) do not know
about possibility of joint teaching with other lecturers in Google Classroom. 65 people (74.7%)
cannot provide a complete list of actions that can be performed in Google Classroom. 69 people
(79.3%) were confused in task evaluation system. 73 people (83.9%) do not have knowledge of
the algorithm for creating tasks in Google Classroom. 58 people (66.6%) are not familiar with
the rubrics.




                                              356
Table 1
Levels of theoretical knowledge and practical skills at the stage of entrance diagnostic
              Criterion             Level       Points       CG            EG            Total
                                                         (46 people)   (41 people)    (87 people)
       Theoretical knowledge      Sufficient     5-10     18 (39.1%)    16 (39.0%)    34 (39.0%)
       Theoretical knowledge     Insufficient     0-4     28 (60.9%)    25 (61.0%)    53 (61.0%)
          Practical skills        Sufficient     5-10     11 (23.9%)    8 (19.5%)     19 (21.8%)
          Practical skills       Insufficient     0-4     35 (76.1%)    33 (80.5%)    68 (78.2%)


   In terms of practical skills, the majority of respondents 82 people (94.2%) are able to create
Gmail Account. However, 59 people (67.8%) could not create their own class/course. Accordingly,
most respondents were unable to perform other tasks properly.
   Thus, the majority of respondents, namely 53 people (61.0%) do not have enough theoretical
knowledge to work with Google Classroom service. And only 34 people (39.0%) have sufficient
level of theoretical knowledge. A similar situation is with practical skills because 68 people
(78.2%) have insufficient level of practical skills and 19 people (21.8%) have sufficient one.
   Based on the matrix and the obtained results, you can see minimum and maximum values
(figure 1). Thus, we can conclude that only 19 people (minimum value) out of 87 effectively use
Google Classroom service and 68 people (maximum value) do not have enough knowledge and
skills to use the service effectively.




Figure 1: Matrix of effectiveness of using Google Classroom web service


  The next stage of the experiment involved the introduction of the methodological development



                                                  357
for lecturers of higher educational establishments under pandemic conditions “Potential of using
Google Classroom web service”. To this end, the authors of the publication conducted online
webinars for lecturers, where the methodological development was presented. Each participant
of the webinar (41 members of the experimental group) received a detailed description of the
methodological development in PDF in order to be able to repeatedly return to it in the process
of mastering the specified web service. The second stage lasted for several months (April – June
2020).
   At the last stage of the experiment (in September 2020), the control diagnosis of the levels
of using Google Classroom web service was performed. Diagnosis was carried out using the
methodological tools used at the first stage. The questionnaire covered teachers of control and
experimental groups.
   The results of determining the levels of theoretical knowledge and practical skills of control
and experimental groups at the stage of control diagnosis are presented in table 2.

Table 2
Levels of theoretical knowledge and practical skills at the stage of entrance diagnostic
                 Criterion              Level        Points   CG (46 people)   EG (41 people
           Theoretical knowledge      Sufficient      5-10      21 (45.7%)       32 (78.0%)
           Theoretical knowledge     Insufficient      0-4      25 (54.3%)        9 (22.0%)
              Practical skills        Sufficient      5-10      16 (34.8%)       34 (82.9%)
              Practical skills       Insufficient     0-4       30 (65.2%)       7 (17.1%)

   The results of the questionnaire at the stage of control diagnosis in the experimental group
revealed positive changes in levels of theoretical knowledge and practical skills of using Google
Classroom web service. In particular, the number of people with sufficient level of theoretical
knowledge increased from 16 to 32 people out of 41. The number of people with sufficient level
of practical skills also increased significantly from 8 to 34 people.
   However, the results did not change significantly in the control group. The number of people
with sufficient level of theoretical knowledge increased from 18 to 21 people. The number of
people with sufficient level of practical skills increased from 11 to 16 people. It is assumed that
the respondents of the control group had chosen other web services to organize the educational
process under pandemic conditions or communicated with students via e-mail.
   The dynamics of changes in levels at different stages of diagnosis is summarized in figure 2.
   To prove the effectiveness of the obtained results Fisher’s criterion was used.
   According to the indicators of entrance stage diagnosis, the number of respondents in the
experimental group with sufficient level of theoretical knowledge and practical skills in average
(16 + 8) : 2 = 12 people 29.26% of 41 people (100%). At the control stage of diagnosis, the
number of respondents in the experimental group with sufficient level of theoretical knowledge
and practical skills was (32 + 34) : 2 = 33 people (80.48%) out of 41 people (100%). This
dynamics in the levels made it possible to formulate two hypotheses:
   𝐻0 – The number of respondents in the experimental group with sufficient level of theoretical
knowledge and practical skills at the entrance stage of diagnosis is less than at the control stage
of diagnosis. This allows one to consider that the suggested and implemented methodological



                                                    358
Figure 2: Dynamics of changes in the levels of theoretical knowledge and practical skills of using Google
Classroom web service at different stages of diagnosis


development is effective.
   𝐻1 – The number of respondents in the experimental group with sufficient level of theoretical
knowledge and practical skills at the entrance stage of diagnosis is the same or more than
at the stage of diagnosis. This allows one to consider that the suggested and implemented
methodological development is not effective.
   Using formula 2 calculate the empirical value 𝜙*𝑒𝑚𝑝 :
                                                   √︂
                                                         𝑛1 𝑛2
                                𝜙*𝑒𝑚𝑝 = (𝜙1 − 𝜙2 )             ,
                                                      𝑛1 + 𝑛2
in which: 𝜙1 – the angle corresponds to the greater % of the part; 𝜙2 – the angle corresponding to
the smaller % of the part; 𝑛1 – quantity of observations in sample 1; 𝑛2 – quantity of observations
in sample 2.
   Thus, get the empirical value: 𝜙*𝑒𝑚𝑝 = 4.89.
   Determine the critical value of 𝜙* , which corresponds to the accepted in psychology levels of
statistical significance:                   {︂
                                     *         1.64 (𝜌 ≤ 0.05)
                                   𝜙𝑐𝑣 =
                                               2.31 (𝜌 ≤ 0.01)
                                      𝜙*𝑒𝑚𝑝 (4.89) > 𝜙*𝑐𝑣 (2.31).
  Since 𝜙*𝑒𝑚𝑝 is in the value range, we can conclude that hypothesis 𝐻0 has been confirmed. The
number of respondents in the experimental group with sufficient level of theoretical knowledge
and practical skills at the entrance stage of diagnosis is smaller than at the control stage of
diagnosis. This allows one to consider that the suggested and implemented methodological
development is effective.



                                                  359
4. Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic, one way or another, has affected all areas of human life. Higher
education is one of the areas that was significantly affected. In an extremely short period of
time, higher education establishments were forced to switch to distance or blended learning.
As a result of quarantine measures caused by the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, there
was a need for a radical change in forms and methods of learning, methods of interpersonal
communication and system of organization of the educational process. Under the conditions of
pandemic the following aspects of using cloud technologies in the educational process of the
universities became of great importance: information and training portals, which include the
joint work of lecturers and students on educational projects; personal account of a teacher and
a student; creation of new platforms; webinars conducting.
   One of the effective and high-quality means of solving educational issues in quite extreme
conditions is Google Classroom web service.
   Thus, Google Classroom web service, as any cloud technology used in the educational
space, has its advantages and disadvantages. The methodical development “Potential of using
Google Classroom web service” described by the authors and implemented in higher education
establishments allows one to effectively use Google Classroom web service in the educational
process. Google Classroom should be used in conjunction with other applications, for example,
Google Meet. In particular, it is recommended to conduct online lectures and online workshops
(seminars) in Google Meet and to check students’ knowledge (tests, written practice, etc.),
upload lectures, educational materials etc. in Google Classroom. Google Classroom web service
under pandemic conditions is used as the main environment for education, whereas before
the COVID-19 pandemic, Google Classroom web service was only a supplement (one of the
teaching methods) to distance education.
   Based on the defined criteria (the level of theoretical knowledge about Google Classroom
web service and the level of practical skills of using Google Classroom web service) and their
levels (insufficient and sufficient), a matrix of efficiency of using Google Classroom web service
was built. The matrix allowed us to see the minimum indicators of the criteria, which were
further developed with the help of the author’s methodological development. The revealed
positive dynamics in the levels of theoretical knowledge and practical skills of using Google
Classroom web service confirmed the effectiveness of the obtained results.
   The research does not cover all aspects of the problem. Further researches should be focused
on the following issues: problem of the impact of Google Classroom web service on students’
achievements; foreign experience in preparing lecturers to use Google Classroom web service;
problem of improving and filling disciplines with the help of Google Classroom web service etc.


References
 [1] S. Semerikov, S. Chukharev, S. Sakhno, A. Striuk, V. Osadchyi, V. Solovieva, T. Vakaliuk,
     P. Nechypurenko, O. Bondarenko, H. Danylchuk, Our sustainable coronavirus future, E3S
     Web of Conferences 166 (2020) 00001. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202016600001.
 [2] M. Velykodna, Psychoanalysis during the COVID-19 pandemic: Several reflections on




                                               360
     countertransference, Psychodynamic Practice 27 (2021) 10–28. doi:10.1080/14753634.
     2020.1863251.
 [3] A. Bielinskyi, I. Khvostina, A. Mamanazarov, A. Matviychuk, S. Semerikov, O. Serdyuk,
     V. Solovieva, V. Soloviev, Predictors of oil shocks. Econophysical approach in environmental
     science, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 628 (2021) 012019.
     doi:10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012019.
 [4] S. Semerikov, H. Kucherova, V. Los, D. Ocheretin, Neural network analytics and forecasting
     the country’s business climate in conditions of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), CEUR
     Workshop Proceedings 2845 (2021) 22–32. URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2845/Paper_3.pdf.
 [5] V. N. Soloviev, A. O. Bielinskyi, N. A. Kharadzjan, Coverage of the coronavirus pandemic
     through entropy measures, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2832 (2020) 24–42. URL: http:
     //ceur-ws.org/Vol-2832/paper02.pdf.
 [6] A. Kiv, P. Hryhoruk, I. Khvostina, V. Solovieva, V. Soloviev, S. Semerikov, Machine learning
     of emerging markets in pandemic times, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2713 (2020) 1–20.
 [7] O. Burov, A. Kiv, S. Semerikov, A. Striuk, M. Striuk, L. Kolgatina, I. Oliinyk, AREdu
     2020 - How augmented reality helps during the coronavirus pandemic, CEUR Workshop
     Proceedings 2731 (2020) 1–46.
 [8] K. Polhun, T. Kramarenko, M. Maloivan, A. Tomilina, Shift from blended learn-
     ing to distance one during the lockdown period using Moodle: test control of stu-
     dents’ academic achievement and analysis of its results, Journal of Physics: Confer-
     ence Series 1840 (2021) 012053. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012053.
     doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012053.
 [9] V. Tkachuk, Y. Yechkalo, S. Semerikov, M. Kislova, Y. Hladyr, Using Mobile ICT for On-
     line Learning During COVID-19 Lockdown, in: A. Bollin, V. Ermolayev, H. C. Mayr,
     M. Nikitchenko, A. Spivakovsky, M. Tkachuk, V. Yakovyna, G. Zholtkevych (Eds.), Informa-
     tion and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications,
     Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021, pp. 46–67.
[10] H. I. Falfushynska, B. B. Buyak, H. V. Tereshchuk, G. M. Torbin, M. M. Kasianchuk,
     Strengthening of e-learning at the leading Ukrainian pedagogical universities in the time
     of COVID-19 pandemic, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2020, in press).
[11] K. C. Nagaraju, K. Madhavi, J. N. Murthy, Research on efficacy of webinars organized for
     faculty during lockdown of COVID-19, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2020, in press).
[12] T. A. Vakaliuk, O. M. Spirin, N. M. Lobanchykova, L. A. Martseva, I. V. Novitska, V. V.
     Kontsedailo, Features of distance learning of cloud technologies for the organization
     educational process in quarantine, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1840 (2021) 012051.
     URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012051. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1840/
     1/012051.
[13] I. Trubavina, S. Dotsenko, O. Naboka, M. Chaikovskyi, H. Meshko, Developing digital
     competence of teachers of humanitarian disciplines in the conditions of COVID-19 quar-
     antine measures, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1840 (2021) 012052. URL: https:
     //doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012052. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012052.
[14] S. Shokaliuk, Y. Bohunenko, I. Lovianova, M. Shyshkina, Technologies of distance learning
     for programming basics on the principles of integrated development of key competences,
     CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2643 (2020) 548–562.



                                              361
[15] M. Syvyi, O. Mazbayev, O. Varakuta, N. Panteleeva, O. Bondarenko, Distance learning as
     innovation technology of school geographical education, CEUR Workshop Proceedings
     2731 (2020) 369–382.
[16] O. Lavrentieva, V. Pererva, O. Krupskyi, I. Britchenko, S. Shabanov, Issues of shaping the
     students’ professional and terminological competence in science area of expertise in the
     sustainable development era, E3S Web of Conferences 166 (2020) 10031. doi:10.1051/
     e3sconf/202016610031.
[17] D. Y. Bobyliev, E. V. Vihrova, Problems and prospects of distance learning in teaching
     fundamental subjects to future mathematics teachers, Journal of Physics: Conference
     Series 1840 (2021) 012002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012002. doi:10.
     1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012002.
[18] S. Semerikov, I. Teplytskyi, Y. Yechkalo, O. Markova, V. Soloviev, A. Kiv, Computer
     simulation of neural networks using spreadsheets: Dr. Anderson, welcome back, CEUR
     Workshop Proceedings 2393 (2019) 833–848.
[19] O. Bondarenko, S. Mantulenko, A. Pikilnyak, Google Classroom as a tool of support
     of blended learning for geography students, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2257 (2018)
     182–191.
[20] O. Bondarenko, O. Pakhomova, W. Lewoniewski, The didactic potential of virtual informa-
     tion educational environment as a tool of geography students training, CEUR Workshop
     Proceedings 2547 (2020) 13–23.
[21] Y. Modlo, S. Semerikov, R. Shajda, S. Tolmachev, O. Markova, P. Nechypurenko, T. Seliv-
     anova, Methods of using mobile internet devices in the formation of the general profes-
     sional component of bachelor in electromechanics competency in modeling of technical
     objects, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2643 (2020) 500–534.
[22] I. Kholoshyn, I. Varfolomyeyeva, O. Hanchuk, O. Bondarenko, A. Pikilnyak, Pedagogical
     techniques of Earth remote sensing data application into modern school practice, CEUR
     Workshop Proceedings 2433 (2019) 391–402.
[23] I. Kholoshyn, O. Bondarenko, O. Hanchuk, E. Shmeltser, Cloud ArcGIS Online as an
     innovative tool for developing geoinformation competence with future geography teachers,
     CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2433 (2019) 403–412.
[24] O. Bondarenko, O. Pakhomova, V. Zaselskiy, The use of cloud technologies when studying
     geography by higher school students, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2433 (2019) 377–390.
[25] I. Kholoshyn, O. Bondarenko, O. Hanchuk, I. Varfolomyeyeva, Cloud technologies as a tool
     of creating Earth Remote Sensing educational resources, CEUR Workshop Proceedings
     2643 (2020) 474–486.
[26] R. Tarasenko, S. Amelina, Y. Kazhan, O. Bondarenko, The use of AR elements in the study
     of foreign languages at the university, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2731 (2020) 129–142.
[27] I. Kholoshyn, T. Nazarenko, O. Bondarenko, O. Hanchuk, I. Varfolomyeyeva, The ap-
     plication of geographic information systems in schools around the world: a retrospec-
     tive analysis, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1840 (2021) 012017. URL: https:
     //doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012017. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012017.
[28] V. Y. Velychko, E. H. Fedorenko, N. V. Kaidan, V. N. Soloviev, O. V. Bondarenko, The
     support of the process of training pre-service mathematics teachers by means of cloud
     services, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2020, in press).



                                             362
[29] A. E. Kiv, V. N. Soloviev, S. O. Semerikov, A. M. Striuk, V. V. Osadchyi, T. A. Vakaliuk,
     P. P. Nechypurenko, O. V. Bondarenko, I. S. Mintii, S. L. Malchenko, XIII International
     Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Journal of Physics:
     Conference Series (2021).
[30] O. Burov, V. Bykov, S. Lytvynova, ICT evolution: From single computational tasks to
     modeling of life, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2732 (2020) 583–590.
[31] V. Pavlenko, A. Prokhorov, O. Kuzminska, M. Mazorchuk, Competence approach to
     modeling and control of students’ learning pathways in the cloud service, CEUR Workshop
     Proceedings 1844 (2017) 257–264.
[32] O. Prokhorov, V. Lisovichenko, M. Mazorchuk, O. Kuzminska, Developing a 3D quest
     game for career guidance to estimate students’ digital competences, CEUR Workshop
     Proceedings 2731 (2020) 312–327.
[33] M. S. Mazorchuk, T. S. Vakulenko, A. O. Bychko, O. H. Kuzminska, O. V. Prokhorov,
     Cloud technologies and learning analytics: web application for PISA results analysis and
     visualization, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2020, in press).
[34] P. Merzlykin, M. Popel, S. Shokaliuk, Services of SageMathCloud environment and their
     didactic potential in learning of informatics and mathematical disciplines, CEUR Workshop
     Proceedings 2168 (2017) 13–19.
[35] M. Popel, S. Shokalyuk, M. Shyshkina, The learning technique of the SageMathCloud use
     for students collaboration support, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1844 (2017) 327–339.
[36] O. Markova, S. Semerikov, M. Popel, CoCalc as a learning tool for neural network simu-
     lation in the special course "Foundations of mathematic informatics", CEUR Workshop
     Proceedings 2104 (2018) 388–403.
[37] O. M. Markova, S. O. Semerikov, A. M. Striuk, The cloud technologies of learning: Origin,
     Information Technologies and Learning Tools 46 (2015) 29–44. URL: https://journal.iitta.
     gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/1234. doi:10.33407/itlt.v46i2.1234.
[38] O. Markova, S. Semerikov, A. Striuk, H. Shalatska, P. Nechypurenko, V. Tron, Implemen-
     tation of cloud service models in training of future information technology specialists,
     CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2433 (2019) 499–515.
[39] Y. Modlo, S. Semerikov, S. Bondarevskyi, S. Tolmachev, O. Markova, P. Nechypurenko,
     Methods of using mobile Internet devices in the formation of the general scientific compo-
     nent of bachelor in electromechanics competency in modeling of technical objects, CEUR
     Workshop Proceedings 2547 (2020) 217–240.
[40] P. Nechypurenko, V. Stoliarenko, T. Starova, T. Selivanova, O. Markova, Y. Modlo,
     E. Shmeltser, Development and implementation of educational resources in chemistry
     with elements of augmented reality, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2547 (2020) 156–167.
[41] D. S. Shepiliev, S. O. Semerikov, Y. V. Yechkalo, V. V. Tkachuk, O. M. Markova, Y. O.
     Modlo, I. S. Mintii, M. M. Mintii, T. V. Selivanova, N. K. Maksyshko, T. A. Vakaliuk, V. V.
     Osadchyi, R. O. Tarasenko, S. M. Amelina, A. E. Kiv, Development of career guidance
     quests using WebAR, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1840 (2021) 012028. URL: https:
     //doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012028. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012028.
[42] D. S. Shepiliev, Y. O. Modlo, Y. V. Yechkalo, V. V. Tkachuk, M. M. Mintii, I. S. Mintii,
     O. M. Markova, T. V. Selivanova, O. M. Drashko, O. O. Kalinichenko, T. A. Vakaliuk, V. V.
     Osadchyi, S. O. Semerikov, WebAR development tools: An overview, CEUR Workshop



                                              363
     Proceedings 2832 (2020) 84–93. URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2832/paper12.pdf.
[43] N. Morze, O. Buinytska, O. Glazunova, O. Kuzminska, G. Protsenko, I. Vorotnykova, E-
     learning managers training at universities: Projection, design and efficiency indicators,
     CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1844 (2017) 229–244.
[44] O. Kuzminska, M. Mazorchuk, N. Morze, V. Pavlenko, A. Prokhorov, Digital competency
     of the students and teachers in Ukraine: Measurement, analysis, development prospects,
     CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2104 (2018) 366–379.
[45] O. Kuzminska, M. Mazorchuk, N. Morze, O. Kobylin, Attitude to the digital learning
     environment in Ukrainian universities, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2393 (2019) 53–67.
[46] O. Glazunova, N. Morze, B. Golub, O. Burov, T. Voloshyna, O. Parhomenko, Learning style
     identification system: Design and data analysis, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2732 (2020)
     793–807.
[47] N. Morze, L. Varchenko-Trotsenko, T. Terletska, E. Smyrnova-Trybulska, Implementation
     of adaptive learning at higher education institutions by means of Moodle LMS, Journal of
     Physics: Conference Series 1840 (2021) 012062. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/
     1840/1/012062. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012062.
[48] N. V. Morze, O. V. Strutynska, Digital transformation in society: key aspects for model
     development, Journal of Physics: Conference Series (2021).
[49] N. V. Morze, V. O. Kucherovska, Ways to design a digital educational environment for
     K-12 education, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2020, in press).
[50] Y. V. Tryus, I. V. Herasymenko, Approaches, models, methods and means of training
     of future IT-specialists with the use of elements of dual education, Journal of Physics:
     Conference Series 1840 (2021) 012034. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/
     012034. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012034.
[51] A. Kiv, M. Shyshkina, S. Semerikov, A. Striuk, Y. Yechkalo, Aredu 2019 – how augmented
     reality transforms to augmented learning, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2547 (2020) 1–12.
[52] N. Rashevska, S. Semerikov, N. Zinonos, V. Tkachuk, M. Shyshkina, Using augmented real-
     ity tools in the teaching of two-dimensional plane geometry, CEUR Workshop Proceedings
     2731 (2020) 79–90.
[53] A. Kiv, M. Shyshkina, S. Semerikov, A. Striuk, M. Striuk, H. Shalatska, CTE 2019 - When
     cloud technologies ruled the education, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2643 (2020) 1–59.
     URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2643/paper00.pdf.
[54] M. Popel, M. Shyshkina, The cloud technologies and augmented reality: The prospects of
     use, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2257 (2018) 232–236.
[55] M. Popel, M. Shyshkina, The areas of educational studies of the cloud-based learning
     systems, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2433 (2019) 159–172.
[56] T. A. Vakaliuk, O. V. Korotun, S. O. Semerikov, The selection of cloud services for ER-
     diagrams construction in IT specialists databases teaching, CEUR Workshop Proceedings
     (2020, in press).
[57] K. P. Osadcha, V. V. Osadchyi, The use of cloud computing technology in professional
     training of future programmers, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2020, in press).
[58] L. V. Bulatetska, V. V. Bulatetskyi, T. O. Hryshanovych, Y. S. Pavlenko, T. I. Cheprasova,
     A. V. Pikilnyak, Operation system features and cloud services for lecturer work, CEUR
     Workshop Proceedings (2020, in press).



                                             364
[59] I. V. Hevko, I. B. Lutsyk, I. I. Lutsyk, O. I. Potapchuk, V. V. Borysov, Implementation of
     web resources using cloud technologies to demonstrate and organize students’ research
     work, Journal of Physics: Conference Series (2021).
[60] N. V. Valko, V. V. Osadchyi, V. S. Kruhlyk, Cloud resources use for students’ project
     activities, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2020, in press).
[61] H. B. Varina, V. V. Osadchyi, K. P. Osadcha, S. V. Shevchenko, S. H. Lytvynova, Peculiari-
     ties of cloud computing use in the process of the first-year students’ adaptive potential
     development, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2020, in press).
[62] N. Soroko, L. Mykhailenko, O. Rokoman, V. Zaselskiy, Educational electronic platforms
     for STEAM-oriented learning environment at general education school, CEUR Workshop
     Proceedings 2643 (2020) 462–473.
[63] N. Soroko, Methodology for teachers’ digital competence developing through the use of
     the STEAM-oriented learning environment, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2732 (2020)
     1260–1271.
[64] A. Abdula, H. Baluta, N. Kozachenko, D. Kassim, Peculiarities of using of the Moodle test
     tools in philosophy teaching, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2643 (2020) 306–320.
[65] I. Mintii, S. Shokaliuk, T. Vakaliuk, M. Mintii, V. Soloviev, Import test questions into
     Moodle LMS, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2433 (2019) 529–540.
[66] V. Ustinova, S. Shokaliuk, I. Mintii, A. Pikilnyak, Modern techniques of organizing computer
     support for future teachers’ independent work in german language, CEUR Workshop
     Proceedings 2433 (2019) 308–321.
[67] I. Mintii, Using Learning Content Management System Moodle in Kryvyi Rih State
     Pedagogical University educational process, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2643 (2020)
     293–305.
[68] P. Nechypurenko, S. Semerikov, VlabEmbed - the new plugin Moodle for the chemistry
     education, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1844 (2017) 319–326.
[69] S. Lytvynova, Cloud-oriented learning environment of secondary school, CEUR Workshop
     Proceedings 2168 (2017) 7–12. URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2168/paper2.pdf.
[70] S. Lytvynova, O. Burov, Methods, forms and safety of learning in corporate social networks,
     CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1844 (2017) 406–413.
[71] S. Lytvynova, O. Pinchuk, The evolution of teaching methods of students in electronic
     social networks, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1844 (2017) 360–371.
[72] S. Proskura, S. Lytvynova, Organization of independent studying of future bachelors
     in computer science within higher education institutions of ukraine, CEUR Workshop
     Proceedings 2104 (2018) 348–358.
[73] S. Lytvynova, Cognitive tasks design by applying computer modeling system for forming
     competences in mathematics, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2104 (2018) 278–293.
[74] O. Spirin, V. Oleksiuk, N. Balyk, S. Lytvynova, S. Sydorenko, The blended methodology of
     learning computer networks: Cloud-based approach, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2393
     (2019) 68–80.
[75] O. Hrashchuk, Osvitnia sfera pislia karantynu, 2020. URL: https://www.pedrada.com.ua/
     article/2785-osvtnya-sfera-pslya-karantinu.




                                              365