<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Towards Context-aware Knowledge Entailment from Health Conversations</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Saeedeh Shekarpour</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Faisal Alshargi</string-name>
          <email>alshargi@informatik.uni-leipzig.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mohammadjafar Shekarpour</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Dayton</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Dayton</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">United States</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Leipzig</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Leipzig</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Despite the competitive efforts of leading companies, cognitive technologies such as chatbot technologies still have limited cognitive capabilities. One of the major challenges that they face is knowledge entailment from the ongoing conversations with a user. Knowledge entailment implies entailing facts that indicate opinions, beliefs, expressions, requests, and feelings of a particular user about a particular target during conversations. The entailed pieces of knowledge will evolve the background knowledge graph of cognitive technologies and advance their contextual inference and reasoning capabilities. Although the Natural Language Processing (NLP) community deals with the Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE) task, it is treated in a static manner where the predefined hypothesis is typically fed to the learning model, and then the model decides whether it is an entailment or not. However, since the discourse of conversations is dynamic and unpredictable, the traditional RTE approach does not suffice in the context of conversational agents. In this vision paper, we demonstrate our work in progress as to inject background knowledge into machine learning approaches where it entails facts using domain-specific ontologies and contextualized knowledge. Further, we propose investigating solutions for extending or transferring this approach to other domains. We frame our discussion in a case study related to mental health conversations.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Knowledge entailment has applicability in various
cognitive technologies such as conversational AI
interfaces (chatbot technologies), which recently gained the
competitive efforts of leading companies. The existing
implementations of this technology have limited
cognitive capabilities where they fail to perceive users’
opinions, beliefs, expressions, requests, and feelings.
Knowledge entailment (also known as knowledge
perception) primarily from the text and secondarily from
conversations between a bot (i.e., conversational agent)
and a user is a major challenge. Knowledge
entailment mainly implies entailing facts that demonstrate
opinions, beliefs, expressions, requests, and feelings
of a particular user about a particular target (object)
from conversations. These entailed pieces of
knowledge will evolve the background knowledge about the
user. Richer background knowledge will extend the
future contextual inference and reasoning capabilities
of cognitive technologies built up on top. Although
the Natural Language Processing (NLP) community
deals with the Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE)
task, it is treated in a static manner where the
predefined hypothesis is typically fed to the learning model,
and then the model decides whether it is entailment
or not. However, the knowledge entailment task,
particularly in our context (conversations being dynamic,
unpredictable, and complex), requires a model for the
purposes of not only learning entailments but also for
inferring all possible hypotheses (including entailing,
contradicting, etc). Recently, the combination of
knowledge representation and machine learning has been in
the center of attention towards reaching an
explainable, accountable, and fair AI which will exhibit more
robust intelligence and reliable capabilities
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15 ref9">(Holzinger
et al. 2017; Samek, Wiegand, and Müller 2017)</xref>
        .
Knowledge representation provides essential
conceptualization (domain ontology), contextual entities, associated
facts, and, more importantly, relations between
entities and concepts. In this paper, we describe our work
in progress as it proposes an ontology-based
knowledge entailment approach over the discourse of
conversations. We demonstrate our envisioned plan in an
illustrative mode to display the open research areas
required the future attention of the community. This
paper is organized as follows: Section 2 discusses the
limitations of the state-of-the-art. Section 3 presents the
problem statement, followed by Section 4, which
showcases a case study. Next, we demonstrate our ultimate
envisioned plan. We close with the remarks related
to the applicabilities of our knowledge entailment
approach in chatbot technologies.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Limitations of the state-of-the-art</title>
      <p>
        RTE
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">(Dagan et al. 2010)</xref>
        is a task in NLP where it
determines whether two given sentences (i) contradict each
other, (ii) are semantically unrelated to each other,
or (iii) one of them (premise) entails the other one
(hypothesis). Figure 1 showcases multiple examples.
For instance for the given premise An older man is
drinking orange juice at a restaurant,
three hypotheses are listed. The first premise A man
is drinking juice. is an entailment (E) of
the premises whereas the second hypothesis Two
women are at a restaurant drinking wine
is a contradiction C and the third one A man in a
restaurant is waiting for his meal to
arrive. is neutral (N). The work presented in
(Bowman et al. 2015) was published in the Stanford
Natural Language Inference (SNLI) corpus, which is
far larger than all of the other existing resources of its
type. It contains more than 500K pairs of sentences,
which are annotated using the labels E (entailment),
C (contradiction), and N (neutral). The RTE task is
substantially important in information extraction, text
summarization, classification, and machine
translation. The NLP community deals with static RTE tasks
where the hypothesis is fed to the learning model,
and then the model decides it is an entailment or not,
while in scenarios such as knowledge entailment from
conversations, we have to develop a generative model
where the model can dynamically generate hypotheses
and there is no predefined hypothesis.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Problem Statement</title>
      <p>In the era of contemporary conversational AI, the first
major deficiency attributes to the lack of a
convincing approach for knowledge entailment from
conversations, e.g., whether or not a chatbot learns the user
by entailing knowledge from ongoing conversations,
and evolves its underlying knowledge for future
conversation management. The second deficiency is that
the available approaches are solely data-driven
approaches (i.e., machine learning approaches) or
rulebased approaches, and in both cases, the inference
capabilities are limited to the underlying data and rules.
Thus, they fail to overcome unpredicted situations. The
machine learning approaches are solely data-driven.
Advancing them with explicit knowledge will result
in faster convergence on sparse data. Furthermore, it
makes them explainable, compliant to the domain, and
more robust against noise. Figure 2A shows the static
RTE task which predicts (discriminates) the proper
label (entailment, contradiction, and neutral) for the
given input text (premise) and the given hypothesis.
In this scenario the input hypothesis is supposed to
be given by the user. In our envisioned model (Figure
2B) there is no need to worry about the hypothesis
because they are automatically fed to a generative model
using the existing facts from the background
knowledge graph. We plan to extend a knowledge entailment
approach (which is a neural network approach) fed
with domain-specific ontologies to contextual as well
as personalized knowledge graphs; it will not only be a
data-driven approach but also a knowledge-driven
approach. To present a clear and practical vision of our
proposed scenario, we frame a case study on the health
domain which entails knowledge from the
conversations about mental health.</p>
      <p>A. Recognizing Textual Entailment
User</p>
      <p>Input Text (premise)</p>
      <p>Hypothesis</p>
      <p>Prediction
(Discriminative)</p>
      <p>Model
prediction
1. Entailment
2. Contradiction
3. Neutral
Generative Model
generating
Entailment 1
Entailment 2
Entailment 3
...</p>
      <p>Background Knowledge
(Ontology + Data )</p>
      <p>User Input Text (premise)</p>
      <p>Background
Knowledge</p>
      <p>B. Knowledge Entailment
Figure 3 demonstrates our expectations from a
knowledge entailment approach over the conversations.
There is a given excerpt from our underlying
conversation dataset (will be introduced in the following). This
excerpt shows semantics referring to insomnia which is
a subject question in most of the questionnaires (such
as PHQ-8 and PHQ-9) for depression disorder.
However, entailing these semantics requires considering the
indicators of insomnia, in addition to the contextual
information from several lines in the course of the
conversation. Considering a given question from PHQ-9
inquiring about the status of the patient’s sleep, our
expectation is that our envisioning approach can entail
the piece of knowledge that “the patient has a sleep
disorder often”. In the following, we introduce the sources
of knowledge which will be incorporated in our
approach.</p>
      <p>Conversation Excerpt
Ellie: how easy is it for you to get a good night's sleep
Participant: it's pretty good eh somewhat
Ellie: What are you like when you don't sleep well
Participant: I'm tired and I kind of fall asleep during class and whatnot
Ellie: do you feel that way often
Participant: yeah it's my fault though
Ellie: hm when was the last time that happened
Participant: um probably today
...</p>
      <p>PHQ9
Trouble falling or staying asleep, or</p>
      <p>sleeping too much?
21.. SeNvoetraaltdaallys
3. MorneetahralynEhvaelfrythDeadyays
4.</p>
      <p>Knowledge Entailment</p>
      <p>Patient has sleep disorder nearly often</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>PHQ-9 Ontology and Lexicon: The Diagnostic and</title>
        <p>
          Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">(Association et al. 2013)</xref>
          suggests that clinical depression can
be diagnosed through the presence of a set of
symptoms over a fixed period of time. The PHQ-9 (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Löwe
et al. 2004</xref>
          ) is a nine-item depression scale that
incorporates DSM-V. It can be utilized to screen, diagnose, and
measure the severity of depression. We are building an
ontology from PHQ-9 where it incorporates all the
concepts, depression symptoms and relevant phrases.
        </p>
        <p>
          Dataset: The Distress Analysis Interview
Corpus Wizard-of-Oz (DAIC-WoZ) interview database
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref7">(Gratch et al. 2014; DeVault et al. 2014)</xref>
          consists of
clinical diagnostic interviews designed to support the
diagnosis of psychological disorders such as anxiety,
depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. This
corpus (DAIC) comprises recorded interviews between a
patient (participant) and a computerized animated
virtual interviewer "Ellie". It contains data from 189
interviews, including transcripts, audio, and video
recordings, and PHQ depression questionnaire responses.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Personalized Healthcare Knowledge Graph (PHKG):</title>
        <p>
          The work presented in
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(Gyrard et al. 2018)</xref>
          introduces
PHKG, which is described as a representation of all
relevant medical knowledge and personal data for a
patient. PHKG can support the development of
innovative applications such as digital personalized coach
applications that can keep patients informed, help to
manage their chronic condition, and empower
physicians to make effective decisions on health-related
issues or receive timely alerts as needed through
continuous monitoring. Typically, PHKG formalizes medical
information in terms of relevant relationships between
entities. For instance, a knowledge graph (KG) for
asthma can describe causes, symptoms, and treatments
for asthma, and a PHKG can be the subgraph
containing just those causes, symptoms, and treatments that
are applicable to a given patient. In our case study,
PHKG is limited to the knowledge about the patient
which is determined from conversations.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Envisioned Plan</title>
      <p>Figure 4 schematically shows our envisioned plan as
the given data in the background knowledge graphs
(personalized health graph and contextualized graph).
Then, our knowledge entailment approach will drive
further knowledge from conversations. The third two
validation and quality assurance strategies will be
applied to determine whether entailed knowledge is valid
or not. This step might rely on manual approaches such
as crowd-sourcing or automatic approaches such as
graph completion and reasoning to validate entailed
knowledge. Finally, the newly entailed knowledge is
added to PHKG and contextualized graphs. Having an
iteration over this cycle or upcoming conversation will
help to both entail further knowledge or augment our
entailment approach.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Input conversation and background knowledge 1</title>
        <p>conversation to
knowledge
Contextualized
Knowledge
Personalized
Knowledge</p>
        <p>Graph</p>
        <p>Conversation
knowledge complesion 3 Augmentation and Quality
Automatic (Graph Completion,</p>
        <p>Reasoning)
Manual (Crowd Sourcing)</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>2 Entailment Module</title>
        <p>Knowledge</p>
        <p>Entailment
validation</p>
        <p>Our model will entail triples
(subject-predicateobject) from conversations where the subject is the
ongoing user, and predicates and objects represent
opinions, beliefs, expressions, requests, and feelings
belonging to the user. Figure 5 demonstrates the
transformation of the input text into a graph that contains
all the entailed facts about the patient. We assume that
all the required relations (predicates) and possible
objects are declared in the domain ontology. If we develop
an attention model that is fed with the context
(cognitive ontology, context, and personalized knowledge)
along with the user utterance then possibly one or
multiple relations and objects acquire higher weight
(attention) – meaning they are entailed from the input
utterance. Furthermore, the higher the volume of
conversations with the user, the better the context-aware
knowledge entailment. The key novel part of this work is
combining domain knowledge representation and
machine learning approaches to provide robust,
explainable, and context-aware solutions.</p>
        <p>Conversation Sample
El ie: how easy is it for you to get a good night's sleep
Participant: it's pretty good eh somewhat
El ie: What are you like when you don't sleep wel
Participant: I'm tired and I kind of fal asleep during class and whatnot
El ie: do you feel that way often
Participant: yeah it's my fault though
El ie: hm when was the last time that happened
Participant: um probably today
...</p>
        <p>1
little interest or pleasure in doing things</p>
        <p>Not at al
2</p>
        <p>Patient
feeling down, depressed</p>
        <p>often
sleeping too much
trouble fal ing asleep
every day</p>
        <p>Not at al</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Applicability in Chatbot Technology</title>
      <p>
        A chatbot is typically an Artificial Intelligence
(AI)based application designed to simulate a
conversation with human users in a continuous and common
sense manner
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">(Lee, Oh, and Choi 2017)</xref>
        . This
assistance can reduce the cognitive load for the user,
especially in high-pressure situations such as surgical
operations, battlefields, and disaster preparedness and
response. Furthermore, it is promising and effective in
everyday life activities, such as retail, travel, news, and
entertainment. However, despite the recent
competitive efforts and investments of leading companies (e.g.,
Facebook (Messenger), Microsoft (Cortana), Apple
(Siri), Google (Duplex), WeChat, and Slack), the
existing implementations do not provide impressive
cognitive capabilities. For example, state-of-the-art chatbots
still struggle with simple conversational domains, such
as task ordering (Microsoft challenge
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">(Li et al. 2018,
2016)</xref>
        , bAbI project of Facebook
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16 ref2">(Bordes, Boureau, and
Weston 2016; Weston et al. 2015)</xref>
        ), and is still far from
complicated conversations in a variety of domains. Our
proposed work, if successful, is a complementary step
for future chatbot technologies.
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Association</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.-. A. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ; et al.
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders</article-title>
          . Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bordes</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Boureau</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Y.-L.; and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weston</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Learning end-to-end goal-oriented dialog</article-title>
          .
          <source>arXiv preprint arXiv:1605</source>
          .
          <fpage>07683</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          2015.
          <article-title>A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference</article-title>
          .
          <source>arXiv preprint arXiv:1508</source>
          .
          <fpage>05326</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dagan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dolan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Magnini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ; and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Roth</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>Recognizing textual entailment: Rational, evaluation and approaches-erratum</article-title>
          .
          <source>Natural Language Engineering</source>
          <volume>16</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>105</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>105</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>DeVault</surname>
            , D.; Artstein,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ; Benn,
          <string-name>
            <surname>G.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ; Dey,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            ;
            <surname>Fast</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            ;
            <surname>Gainer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            ;
            <surname>Georgila</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            ;
            <surname>Gratch</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            ;
            <surname>Hartholt</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            ;
            <surname>Lhommet</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ; et al.
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>SimSensei Kiosk: A virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems</source>
          ,
          <volume>1061</volume>
          -
          <fpage>1068</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gratch</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ; Artstein,
          <string-name>
            <surname>R.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ; Lucas,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. M.</given-names>
            ;
            <surname>Stratou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>G.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ; Scherer,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            ;
            <surname>Nazarian</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            ;
            <surname>Wood</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            ; Boberg, J.; DeVault, D.;
            <surname>Marsella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>S.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ; et al.
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>The distress analysis interview corpus of human and computer interviews</article-title>
          .
          <source>In LREC</source>
          ,
          <fpage>3123</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3128</lpage>
          . Citeseer.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gyrard</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gaur</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shekarpour</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thirunarayan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ; and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sheth</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <article-title>Personalized Health Knowledge Graph</article-title>
          .
          <source>In ISWC 2018 Contextualized Knowledge Graph Workshop.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Holzinger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Biemann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pattichis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ; and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kell</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain? arXiv preprint</article-title>
          arXiv:
          <volume>1712</volume>
          .
          <fpage>09923</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          -J.; and Choi, H.-J.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>The chatbot feels you-a counseling service using emotional response generation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp)</source>
          ,
          <fpage>437</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>440</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lipton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dhingra</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gao</surname>
            , J.; and Chen,
            <given-names>Y.-N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>A user simulator for task-completion dialogues</article-title>
          .
          <source>arXiv preprint arXiv:1612</source>
          .
          <fpage>05688</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          2018.
          <article-title>Microsoft dialogue challenge: Building end-toend task-completion dialogue systems</article-title>
          . arXiv preprint arXiv:
          <year>1807</year>
          .11125 .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Löwe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kroenke</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Herzog</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ; and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gräfe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2004</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of affective disorders 81</source>
          <volume>(1)</volume>
          :
          <fpage>61</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>66</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Samek</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ; Wiegand,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            ; and
            <surname>Müller</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>K.-R.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>Explainable artificial intelligence: Understanding, visualizing and interpreting deep learning models</article-title>
          .
          <source>arXiv preprint arXiv:1708</source>
          .
          <fpage>08296</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weston</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bordes</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chopra</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rush</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A. M.; van Merriënboer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Joulin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ; and Mikolov,
          <string-name>
            <surname>T.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>Towards ai-complete question answering: A set of prerequisite toy tasks</article-title>
          .
          <source>arXiv preprint arXiv:1502</source>
          .
          <fpage>05698</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>