=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-2888/paper9 |storemode=property |title=Utilizing AI to Improve Efficiency of the Environment and Land Court in the Kenyan Judiciary: Leveraging AI Capabilities in Land Dispute Cases in the Kenyan Environment and Land Court System |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2888/paper9.pdf |volume=Vol-2888 |authors=Florence Ogonjo,Joseph Theuri Gitonga,Angeline Wairegi,Isaac Rutenberg |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/icail/OgonjoGWR21 }} ==Utilizing AI to Improve Efficiency of the Environment and Land Court in the Kenyan Judiciary: Leveraging AI Capabilities in Land Dispute Cases in the Kenyan Environment and Land Court System== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2888/paper9.pdf
    Utilizing AI to Improve Efficiency of the Environment and Land
                      Court in the Kenyan Judiciary
Leveraging AI Capabilities in Land Dispute Cases in the Kenyan Environmental and Land Court System
          Florence Ogonjo                                       Joseph Theuri Gitonga                            Dr. Angeline Wairegi†
               CIPIT                                                       CIPIT                                           CIPIT
        Strathmore University                                       Strathmore University                          Strathmore University
           Nairobi, Kenya                                              Nairobi, Kenya                                  Nairobi, Kenya
       fogonjo@strathmore.edu                                     jgitonga@strathmore.edu                         awairegi@strathmore.edu

                                                                        Dr. Isaac Rutenberg
                                                                                CIPIT
                                                                         Strathmore University
                                                                            Nairobi, Kenya
                                                                      irutenberg@strathmore.edu


ABSTRACT                                                                        and poverty that continues to plague the nation [2, 3]. The transition
                                                                                from pre-colonial communal land ownership to private land
The number of land disputes in Kenya continues to increase with                 ownership, which started in the colonial period and has continued
population and economic growth. In 2013, the judiciary established              in the post-colonial era, produced a number of contradictions in
the Environment and Land Court (ELC) to hear disputes relating to               administering and managing land that are present to this day [4]. A
environment and land. Unfortunately, the ELC is plagued with the                large number of land policies enacted in the colonial era persisted
same problems affecting Kenya’s other courts; chief amongst these               even after the country attained its independence in 1963. As a
is an extensive backlog of cases. Past attempts by the judiciary to             result, despite enacting individual tenure of indigenous land and
eliminate this backlog have met with varying degrees of success. In             redistributing the fertile lands in the highlands occupied by
this paper, we argue that augmenting human abilities with AI                    colonialists to its citizens, Kenya is plagued with land conflicts and
technology is a viable means of tackling this case backlog. This                its courts inundated with land dispute cases among individuals and
paper outlines AI tools that may aid legal personnel in the ELC in              between communities [5].
performing their duties and, ultimately, reducing the number of                      Changing cultural practices are increasing pressure on the
pending cases.                                                                  country’s land tenure system as well. For example, the Pokot tribe
                                                                                in the highlands of Baringo county traditionally practiced semi‐
KEYWORDS                                                                        nomadic pastoralism; in recent years, however, the community has
Kenyan Judiciary, Environment and Land Court, Artificial                        adopted a more sedentary lifestyle and taken up rain‐fed agriculture
Intelligence (AI), Legal Research, Transcription, Online Dispute                [6]. The transition from common property to private tenure has led
Resolution                                                                      to increased land disputes within members of the tribe [6]. In the
                                                                                past, people accessed land and asserted their land rights in 3 ways:
                                                                                (i) using clan-based definitions of landholding communities, (ii)
1    INTRODUCTION                                                               through family-based inheritance, and (iii) from claims to rights
     Kenya’s relationship with land can be viewed in pre and post –             based on long-term occupancy and use [1]. Tensions between these
colonial terms: a precolonial context of land abundance and relative            traditional land administration methods and current land laws are
labor scarcity, and a late colonial and postcolonial situation of               also contributing to land disputes in the nation. The Maasai’s
rising populations and growing pressure on land [1]. Colonial land              customary land holding, for example, is based on long occupation,
policy in Kenya resulted in inequality in land ownership and use,               continuous use, traditional rights, colonial treaty, and the Group
resentment by Africans, landlessness, squatting, land degradation               Representatives Land Act adopted in the early years after
                                                                                independence [7]. In recent years, the tribe’s people are
†
 Corresponding author.                                                          experiencing dispossession from people making claims to their land
In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on AI and Intelligent      based on the more formal land laws currently in place [7].
Assistance for Legal Professionals in the Digital Workplace (LegalAIIA 2021),
held in conjunction with ICAIL 2021, June 21, 2021, Sao Paulo, Brazil                Gender disparities in land ownership and access to land are
Copyright © 2021 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative    prevalent in Kenya. Women lag behind in securing land rights.
Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
Published at http://ceur-ws.org                                                 Women, particularly those residing in rural areas, are more likely
                                                                                to be systematically excluded from family and patriarchal land
 LegalAIIA’21, June, 2021, Sao Paolo, Brazil                                                                                 F. Ogonjo et al.

ownership – only having access to land through a male relative –          influenced by the backlog of land cases in the High Court. Case
leaving them in precarious financial situations [8]. This can lead to     backlog - defined as cases that have been pending for more than
land disputes. A 2005 study found that widows in the country are          one year - and delays in delivery of justice have been main
13% more likely to experience land conflicts when their parcels are       indictments against the Kenyan judiciary.
registered under the names of their deceased husbands than when                Underfunding of the judiciary is one of the main reasons for the
titles are registered under their names [9].                              increasing case backlog in courts across the country. The entire
     Generally, the source of land conflicts can be grouped into 3        judiciary system is regularly subjected to abrupt budget cuts from
categories: (i) competing land claims from agricultural and               the government; in fact, the Judiciary’s funding has been on a
urbanization demands as a result of rural – urban migratory patterns      downward trend since the 2012 - 2013 fiscal year [20, 21].
[10], (ii) conflict between the elite and ordinary citizens in terms of   Budgetary constraints mean that the judiciary is consistently
land distribution, natural resource extraction and unbalanced rent        operating with less than the required workforce (55% of the
sharing [11, 12, 13, 14, 15], and (iii) land grabbing using political     required workforce in the 2019 – 2020 fiscal year [21]) which
or civil machinations [14, 16, 17, 18]. The number of disputes over       inevitably results in an increase in the number of pending cases. For
land continue to increase with population and economic growth. As         example, in the 2016 – 2017 fiscal year there were 499,341 pending
family patriarchs that acquired land in the early Independence era        cases, and this number increased to 617,582 by 2019 – 2020 [20,
pass there is an increase in land inheritance disputes which also         21]. Other factors that contribute to the backlog include: poor
contributes to rising land conflicts.                                     physical infrastructure – there has been minimal progress in the
     Prior to 2010, Kenya did not have a comprehensive system of          completion of court construction across the country; lack of ICT
land laws, particularly those pertaining to women’s land rights. In       capacity to assist with core judicial processes; judicial
2010, it adopted a new constitution that allowed for the                  organizational structure; court rules and procedures; and manual
implementation of the National Land Policy through institutions           management of court records [20, 22].
such as the National Land Commission Act (NLC). The                            It is worth noting that the judiciary is actively working on
formulation of a comprehensive National Land Policy commenced             reducing case backlog. In the 2018 – 2019 fiscal year, under Chief
in February 2004 and was completed in 2009. The National Land             Justice David Kenani Maraga, the judiciary significantly reduced
Policy was commissioned by the government to tackle issues of             the number of cases pending in the court system - bring down cases
squatting, landlessness, disinheritance of some groups and                that are five years old from 110,000 to only 15,278 cases [23]. The
individuals, urban squalor, under-utilization and abandonment of          issue of case backlog is a perennial headache for the judiciary,
agricultural land, deterioration in land quality, tenure insecurity,      though, with Chief Justice Maraga noting that the number of cases
and conflict [8]. The National Land Policy recommended the                filed in Kenyan courts every year exceeds the number of cases the
creation of mechanisms to ensure access to timely, efficient and          judiciary settles by as much as 100,000, causing an ever-growing
affordable dispute resolution to land conflicts. This led to the          backlog [24].
establishment of the Environment and Land Court.                               The ELC has one of the highest number of pending cases,
     Following promulgation of the 2010 constitution, an                  13,630 cases for the 2019 – 2020 fiscal year, across all counties
Environment and Land Court Act was approved in 2011 under                 despite an impressive case clearance rate [21]. Of the 13,630 cases,
which a new Environment and Land Court (ELC) was created as a             21%, 2920 cases, have been in the court system for greater than 5
specialized court. Currently, 29 of the country’s 47 counties have        years, 34%, 4628 cases, are aged between 3 – 5 years, and 45%,
an ELC. The Environment and Land Court is a Superior Court with           6082 cases, have been pending for 1 – 3 years [21]. Most of the
the same status as the High Court of Kenya. It has jurisdiction to        disputes in the ELC are family disagreements over land and fraud
hear disputes relating to environment and land. Specifically, the         related cases, 29%; succession cases account for 20%, boundary
court has the power to: (i) hear disputes relating to land                disputes, 15%, and double registration and double allocation
administration and management, (ii) hear cases relating to public,        accounted for 10% and 9% of the cases, respectively [2]. The
private and community land and contracts, (iii) hear cases relating       impact of these protracted legal proceedings is devastating to the
to environmental planning and protection (iv) exercise appellate          parties involved in the disputes.
jurisdiction over the decisions of subordinate courts or local
tribunals, and (v) exercise supervisory jurisdiction over the
subordinate courts, local tribunals, persons or authorities [19]. The
ELC began its operations in 2013. The majority of the cases
handled by ELC relate to land disputes rather than environmental
matters.

2    CURRENT PERFORMANCE OF THE
ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
Unfortunately, the ELC is plagued with many of the same problems
affecting Kenyan courts; chief amongst these is an extensive back         Figure 1: The total number of pending cases over a year old
log of cases. Ironically, establishment of the ELC was largely            across the Kenyan judiciary system as reported in the State of
 Utilizing AI to Improve Efficiency of the Environment and Land
                                                                                                LegalAIIA’21, June, 2021, Sao Paolo, Brazil
 Court in the Kenyan Judiciary

the Judiciary and the Administration of Justice Annual Report
2019 – 2020 [21].

    In order to accurately assess the current performance of the
ELC this study evaluated the total number of pending cases and
their average age in all 29 ELC county stations. It also examined
the average age of cases in terms of those that were ultimately
dismissed and those allowed to proceed through the court. This data
was obtained by analyzing court fillings in the Environment and
Land Court posted on the Kenya Law online website, the official
account of the Kenyan judiciary. A computational search of the
court case meta-data was performed and the relevant data compiled.
    Between 2002 – 2020 the number of land cases filed in
Environment and Land Courts increased significantly. The
distribution of the number of cases filed each year is shown in
Figure. 2. The significant decrease in the number of cases in 2020
was due to a lack of availability in the court’s calendar, i.e., the case
backlog prevented parties from scheduling new hearings in the
ELC. Chief Justice David Maraga announced in January 23, 2020
that the Environment and Land Courts are fully booked until March
2021, and called for urgent measures to fund the Judiciary’s bid to
employ more judges and magistrates to deal with the case backlog
[25].

                                                                            Figure 3: A mapping of the number of pending land cases filed
                                                                            in Environment and Land Courts in counties across Kenya.
                                                                            The highest caseloads are in Nairobi, Nakuru and Meru
                                                                            counties, with 18%, 7% and 7% of the 14,686 total pending
                                                                            cases, respectively.

                                                                                The average age of these cases is 3 years. The highest average
                                                                            durations from filing to judgement are in Meru county, 4.5 years,
                                                                            Machakos county, 4.3 years and Bungoma county, 3.8 years.
                                                                            Figure. 4 outlines the average duration of cases in the ELC system
                                                                            in counties across the country.
                                                                                It is clear that the current court system is ill equipped to deal
                                                                            with the demand of cases. In the following section, we argue that
                                                                            AI tools could be used to significantly decrease, or eliminate, the
Figure 2: The total number of land cases filed in Environment
                                                                            backlog of cases. We outline the different AI tools that the Kenyan
and Land Courts in 29 counties for the 2002 -2020 period. The
                                                                            Judiciary should introduce to the ELC to aid the legal workforce to
cases between 2002 – 2012 are land cases carried over to the
                                                                            efficiently perform their duties and, ultimately, tackle the large
ELC from the High Court.
                                                                            number of pending cases.
    There are a total of 14,686 pending land cases. The distribution
                                                                            3          UTILIZING AI IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND
of cases across the country is shown in Figure. 3. A total of 127
                                                                            LAND COURT
judges are assigned to these cases, equating to an average of 115
                                                                            The use of AI in legal proceedings is not as prevalent in Africa as
pending cases per judge.
                                                                            it is in the USA or Europe. A few African firms - Bowman, with
                                                                            offices in Nairobi, Kenya; Webber–Wetzel, headquartered in
                                                                            Johannesburg, South Africa, and KTA Advocates (formerly
                                                                            Karuhanga, Tabaro & Associates) in Uganda, for instance - have
                                                                            adopted AI to improve their legal services delivery; streamlining
                                                                            the mundane, time consuming tasks through the use of AI systems
                                                                            and freeing up their lawyers’ time to focus on high level tasks [26].
 LegalAIIA’21, June, 2021, Sao Paolo, Brazil                                                                                   F. Ogonjo et al.

                                                                           and (iv) lack of funding and labor to augment legal proceedings
                                                                           with AI technology. This paper argues that AI holds great potential
                                                                           in increasing the efficiency of the Kenyan courts thereby reducing
                                                                           the current and future case backlog.

                                                                           3.1 AI in Legal Research for Land Dispute Cases
                                                                                The Kenyan legal system, like many globally, is based on
                                                                           precedent - judges make rulings consistent with prior cases on the
                                                                           same subject. Judges must therefore identify and retrieve
                                                                           information from relevant cases to support their decision-making.
                                                                           The high number, and high complexity, of cases that judges must
                                                                           sift through makes this aspect of their job highly time consuming
                                                                           and contributes to the length of a trial. AI tools that aid with legal
                                                                           research would ease this aspect of judges’ workload.
                                                                                AI legal research platforms are computer software systems that
                                                                           not only perform pre – programmed tasks but have the ability to
                                                                           learn and refine their searches and outputs. Machine learning (ML)
                                                                           and Natural Language Processing (NLP) may offer affordable ways
                                                                           to obtain precise and relevant legal research results [34, 35, 36, 37].
                                                                           Some of the commercially available AI legal research platforms use
                                                                           natural language processing to search and process data using pre-
                                                                           defined parameters. NLP uses prior users’ queries and results to
                                                                           form a predictive model, expanding or narrowing a search to ensure
                                                                           all relevant cases are identified. The efficacy of these tools is
Figure 4: A mapping of the average age of land cases filed in
                                                                           documented. A 2018 study, for example, found that attorneys who
ELC in counties across Kenya. The average age for pending
                                                                           used AI tools to conduct legal research completed projects 24.5%
cases in the ELC system country-wide is 3 years.
                                                                           faster and the search results were 21% more relevant; the study
                                                                           concluded that use of AI would save attorneys 132 – 210 hours a
LawPavillion, a Nigerian legal technology company, launched an
                                                                           year when conducting legal research [38].
AI platform in 2016, LawPavillionPrime, that gives in-depth
                                                                                The cost reduction potential of these AI legal research
analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of legal positions and
                                                                           platforms should also motivate the ELC to integrate them to the
authorities by generating statistical analysis, historical data,
                                                                           current adjudicating process. Understanding the exact fiscal impact
precedential value ratings, conflicting judgments, locus classicus,
                                                                           of AI solutions in the ELC before implementation, however, is
statutory or literary authorities, and opinions [27]. This was the first
                                                                           difficult. The cost of software, implementation, training and
such platform launched on the continent. In 2018, it released TIMI,
                                                                           staffing comparative to current processing and personnel cost may
Nigeria’s first artificial intelligence legal assistant, which assists
                                                                           not incentivize utilization of these AI systems if it is prohibitively
lawyers with legal research, litigation, opinion drafting, provides
                                                                           higher. The previous upgrade to provide internet and Wi-Fi access
notes with legal authorities, and gives a step-by-step guide on
                                                                           in 90% of the courts cost KSH 40 Million (£300,000) and stalled
drafting and filing court processes [28].
                                                                           shortly after surpassing that sum due to lack of funds [39]. If the
     In general, however, law offices and courts on the continent
                                                                           cost of deploying AI legal research platforms is similar than the
have been slow to embrace technology. In 2018, for example, the
                                                                           same problem may arise. Fortunately, there are several AI legal
Law Society of Kenya (LSK) went to court to oppose a decision by
                                                                           research platforms, also known as ‘Due Diligence’ platforms
the Ministry of Lands and Physical Planning to digitize the land
                                                                           currently on the market: Kira Systems, Leverton, eBrevia, Ross
transactions processes at the land registry through the National
                                                                           Intelligence, CaseText, WhatSun, TIMI, and many more, at varying
Land Information Management System (NLIMS), arguing that the
                                                                           price points depending on the functionality and tools available.
ministry had failed to consult the relevant stakeholders as required
                                                                           Subscriptions can be as low as $59 per month.
[29, 30, 31]. The government argues that digitizing land registration
                                                                                Effective deployment of these tools will also require extensive
documents will root out corruption in land transactions while the
                                                                           personnel and algorithm training. The cost of both of these training
LSK argues that done without appropriate legislation, digitization
                                                                           is likely to vary. However, these initial costs are likely to be offset
is likely to increase corruption in land management [32].
                                                                           in the long term by a reduction in the personnel required to operate
Furthermore, it is only in recent years that digital signatures and
                                                                           the ELC efficiently. The hiring practices in the ELC will need to be
service of pleadings via email have taken root in the country [33].
                                                                           drastically altered if these tools are adopted. There will be no need
    Currently, AI is not utilized in the Kenyan judicial system in a
                                                                           to recruit armies of young lawyers to perform services that are no
substantive manner. There are several reasons for this: (i) poor
                                                                           longer needed, instead the ELC will need to hire a smaller number
digital infrastructure and data capacity, (ii) under-digitization of
                                                                           of legal personnel adept at utilizing AI legal research platforms.
records, (iii) tradition-bound court systems and legal professionals,
 Utilizing AI to Improve Efficiency of the Environment and Land
                                                                                               LegalAIIA’21, June, 2021, Sao Paolo, Brazil
 Court in the Kenyan Judiciary

      These platforms are only as strong as the data they have access     corporations are hesitant to invest in digital infrastructure in these
to. Access to comprehensive, robust case data increases the               rural communities. In order to provide digital infrastructure capable
efficiency and accuracy of AI platform searches. Opportunely, in          of supporting all technologies, the Kenyan government and private
2017, the Kenyan judiciary unveiled its digital strategy, enshrined       industries may have to work together. The government may
in the 2017-2021 Sustaining the Judiciary Transformation                  subsidize some of the costs of construction incentivizing private
Blueprint, to re-engineer its processes through information and           industries to provide better digital services in rural areas.
communications technology (ICT) [40]. Part of the strategy                Alternatively, both parties can opt to share the infrastructure to cut
outlined is the digitization of court records and proceedings,            down cost.
retiring archaic filing systems and modernizing document
management [40]. According to the Ministry of ICT, 60 million             3.2 AI for Speech Recognition and Transcription in ELC
records were digitized under the High Court Registry pilot                The official records of courtroom proceedings are vital in the
digitization project [41]. There are minimal reports on the progress      justice system. Legal transcription is therefore a vital component of
of the digitization project in other courts. Digitization of these        the adjudication process. Court transcripts influence, “…the
records will make the use of AI to conduct legal research a viable        conduct of the trial, whether by court alone or by court and jury;
strategy.                                                                 the relationships between the trial judge and participating counsel;
     Access to land records is necessary for effective deployment of      the procedures for review of the trial by the trial judge; and
these platforms. This means that complete digitization of land            appellate review, including the feasibility of seeking such review
records in the country is required. In April 2021, the government         and the nature, scope and potential achievements thereof” [46].
launched a new National Land Information Management System                Unfortunately, underfunding of the judiciary affects the number of
(NLIMS), a digital land resource management platform named                available court transcriptionists. This shortage of transcriptionists
Ardhisasa; another step in the government’s goal to digitize land         has left many courts on their own when it comes to obtaining
records and transactions [42]. The phased roll out of the Ardhisasa       accurate transcripts of courtroom events. Many court proceedings
platform started in Nairobi (where digitalization of all services is      in Kenya exist only as audio recordings. In 2019, the Judiciary and
complete), with another twenty counties to be on-boarded to the           the Ministry of Information vowed to digitize all audio court
digital system by the end 2021. The platform is expected to be            proceedings using the Ajira Digital Program, while employing
available across the country by the end of 2022 – a goal that falls       youth to perform the transcription [47]. This is a worthwhile but
short of the 2021 completion date of digitization of land records set     slow endeavor. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many Kenyan
by the government in 2019. A partial digitization of these records        courts were forced to adopt real – time transcript devices. Data
would invariably affect the efficacy of the AI legal research tools.      regarding how many, if any, Environment and Land Courts adopted
     Digitization of land services is likely to be more cost effective    these devices could not be found.
as well. In 2009, the average cost of managing the manual land                 AI can reduce case backlog at the ELC by filling in the gaps
system was KSH 1,770.00 per file documents; it cost KSH                   caused by the shortage of court transcriptionists. AI coupled with
10,621.00 on average to trace a misfiled or missing documents and         automatic speech recognition (ASR) allows for proceedings to be
KSH 19,473.00 to reproduce a lost file or document in the land            recorded, processed, and transcribed faster than using traditional
registry [43]. These costs were significantly lower in developing         court transcriptionists. Generally, ASR in targeted applications
countries that had fully digitized their operations [43].                 (e.g., legal or medical transcriptions) tends to have lower accuracy
     It should be noted that the country’s poor digital infrastructure,   than in general purpose applications (e.g., regular speech, internet
i.e., lack of internet access, poor internet connectivity, and cost       search engines) [48]. However, automated speech recognition
prohibitive internet, may hamper the use of these AI platforms in         (ASR) technology combined with AI improves speech-to-text
Environment and Land Courts located in rural counties. There is an        engines increasing their ability and allowing them to transcribe
ongoing push by the Ministry of ICT to improve access to high-            jargon-heavy legal proceedings highly accurately [49]. In general,
speed internet in rural locations [44]. However, there are number of      the most effective application of these AI transcription tools
obstacles hindering this goal. First, rural communities often lack        augment the automated process with human oversight; the
reliable electricity which makes it harder for technology companies       automatically produced transcripts are reviewed and edited by
to set up internet networks. The quality of available digital             professional transcribers to ensure the highest level of accuracy
infrastructure is also cause for concern. For example, only 57% of        [49]. This would be especially critical in this context since ASR is
the population receives 4G coverage in Kenya, and the majority of         less accurate when dealing with accented speech [48, 50].
places not covered are rural [45]; as a result, even the simplest         Corrections or enhancements are fed back to the ASR via adaptive
technologies often don’t work as expected in these areas. Finally,        algorithms, allowing the technology to constantly improve [49]. A
the depressed income of many residents in the rural areas mean            review of a transcript should take much less time than manually
competing basic needs often impact the ability to access digital          transcribing audio recording of court proceedings.
services. Perversely, the cost of offering internet services is often          Additionally, AI transcription service systems provide high
higher in rural areas due to greater costs in building, servicing and     searchable features, allowing for targeted data to be easily
even fueling those networks [45]. As a result of lower demand,            identified using relevant keywords and dispersed files to be
 LegalAIIA’21, June, 2021, Sao Paolo, Brazil                                                                                F. Ogonjo et al.

consolidated in the form of an organized digital database [51]. This    dismissed were pending for a longer duration in most of the
would further streamline case management flow in the ELC and            counties surveyed.
mitigate case backlog.
     Funding is both an obstacle and motivation in deploying AI               Predicting judicial matters is an ongoing and longstanding
transcription platforms in the ELC. In the USA, the most commonly       preoccupation in legal circles that continues to be an open issue in
recommended AI services cost around 25¢ per minute of audio, and        both the theory practice of the law [54, 55, 56, 57, 58]. In recent
services employing human transcriptionists cost up to $2 for a          years, AI based approaches have been increasingly utilized for legal
minute of clear audio [52]. One transcription service operating in      predictive analysis. AI can be used to identify patterns in a judges’
Kenya offers rates of $1.00 per minute for legal transcription with     rulings, allowing lawyers and other legal professionals to predict
5 - day delivery [53]. Therefore, in addition to increasing the speed   how the court may rule. Algorithms and machine-learning can
of the transcription process, use of AI transcription platforms would   interpret data and predict a logical outcome for a case before filling.
save the perennially underfunded ELC money. It is worth noting          Environment and Land Courts publish case details including
that during the 2019 fiscal year, the Directorate of the ICT            judgements online making big data analysis possible.
developed specifications for the procurement of a speech to text             Researchers in the United States were the first to determine
software system, however, the procurement process was halted due        whether machine learning techniques could be used to predict
to lack of funds [21]. The judiciary will have to overcome this short   courts’ decisions or the voting behavior of judges [59, 60]. Katz
term funding obstacle to enjoy the long term cost savings from          et al. developed a prediction model that aims to predict whether the
utilization of the AI transcription platforms.                          US Supreme Court as a whole affirms or reverses the status quo
     AI transcription service systems also provide high searchable      judgement, and whether each individual Justice of the Supreme
features, allowing for targeted data to be easily identified using      Court will vote to affirm or reverse the status quo judgement; the
relevant keywords and dispersed files to be consolidated in the form    model achieved an accuracy of 70.2% at the case outcome level and
of an organized digital database [51]. This would further streamline    71.9% at the justice vote level [61]. Medvedeva et. al. found that
case management flow in the ELC and mitigate case backlog.              Natural Language Processing techniques could predict (future)
                                                                        judicial decisions in the European Court of Human Rights with an
3.3 Predictive Analysis on Case Duration and Dismissals                 average accuracy of 75% [62]. The study used a computer to
One of the most frustrating aspects of the prolonged adjudication       perform quantitative analysis on words and phrases used in a court
process in the ELC is that it is just as likely to result in a case     case and then based on that analysis trained the computer to predict
dismissal as it is to result in a ruling in favor or against the        the decision of the Court [62]. It is feasible that similar approaches
aggrieved party. In fact, in the survey of ELC done in this study,      may be used to predict whether a case may or may not be dismissed
the cases that were ultimately dismissed were in the courts longer      by the ELC. This approach is likely to reduce the number of land
than those that resulted in a judgement for or against one of the       dispute cases filed in the ELC – a prediction of dismissal may force
parties.                                                                the aggrieved parties to seek alternate dispute resolutions. The
                                                                        ethical ramifications of this type of predictive analysis would need
                                                                        to be taken into account, however. There are concerns that the use
                                                                        of this sophisticated AI prediction models may only be accessible
                                                                        to wealthy litigants, leaving those that cannot afford them in a less
                                                                        powerful position of legal armament [63]. Issues of AI bias are well
                                                                        documented [64]; pro-active measures will need to be implemented
                                                                        to identify any bias present in the predictive AI platforms.
                                                                              Predictive analytics may also be used to predict the duration of
                                                                        a court case [65]. This would allow courts to give priority to cases
                                                                        that are predicted to consume less processing time in order to
                                                                        reduce the average total time in adjudicating cases on the docket.
                                                                        Knowledge on the duration of a case might also quell litigants’
                                                                        desire to submit cases to the ELC, instead seeking alternate routes
                                                                        of dispute resolution.

                                                                        3.4 Online Dispute Resolution
                                                                        There are 3 reasons that the Kenyan judiciary should embrace
                                                                        online courts as platforms for providing justice. First, some of the
                                                                        farthest regions of the country, largely rural areas, still do not have
Figure 5: The average age of cases in ELC in various counties           physical court buildings, which means that advocates and witnesses
in 2 categories: cases that are ultimately dismissed and those          travel long distances in search of justice [66]. In fact, Environment
that are heard by the court. In general, cases that were                and Land Courts are only present in 29 counties in the country.
                                                                        Second, in instances where legal representation is cost prohibitive,
 Utilizing AI to Improve Efficiency of the Environment and Land
                                                                                               LegalAIIA’21, June, 2021, Sao Paolo, Brazil
 Court in the Kenyan Judiciary

litigants may use these online courts and represent themselves.           new platforms of justice introduced by the judiciary. In the coming
Finally, online courts may expedite adjudication of a case by             years, with greater exposure, familiarity and uptake, ODR may
eliminating the need of legal counsel or judges for hearings by fully     become the commonly chosen, if not the default option, of
automating the legal process or requiring human input only in the         arbitration in the ELC. This is especially likely given the sluggish
‘ruling’ portion of the proceedings. In this case, Online Dispute         pace of construction of ELC courts across the country and the
Resolution (ODR) utilizing online courts would provide means of           staggering distances that parties in more remote locales must travel
settling land disputes via a hearing using technology but outside of      for in – person hearings.
the courtroom. There are several such AI platforms in use. ODR
platforms such as Rechtwijzer, MyLaw BC, and the British                  5         CONCLUSION
Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal, utilize AI to determine which         Kenya’s judiciary is stuck in a perennial battle against an ever
cases may be adjudicated using the platform, and to automate              increasing case backlog. Despite small successes in recent years in
decision-making and settlement or outcome proposal [67]. Similar          reducing the number of cases pending in the court system, it is clear
platforms could be deployed by the Kenyan judiciary system. By            that human efforts alone are not sufficient to tackle this problem.
mining data from prior related court cases and decisions these            AI offers a great opportunity for the judiciary to achieve its service
platforms could autonomously decide settlement options or fair            delivery goals. The problems caused by insufficient funding and
                                                                          workforce could be mitigated by utilizing AI tools.
adjudication. Judges could review the platform’s decision to ensure
                                                                              In this paper we introduce 4 ways that AI may be used to ease
it is just. AI could help parties reach an equitable settlement in land   the pressure on the Environment and Land Courts; emphasizing
disputes.                                                                 that augmenting these tools to existing human abilities would be
      The issue of digital literacy, especially in rural counties, must   the best way of leveraging both AI and human abilities. While the
be considered and addressed for the government to effectively             country’s poor digital infrastructure and data capacity does create
utilize ODR platforms across the country. The number of people in         obstacles in deploying these AI tools, we believe that these are not
the country who are able to effectively use digital technologies is       insurmountable and that the strategies outlined in this paper are the
still low; only 25% of the population are mobile internet users           best way forward.
according to a 2019 study compared to 95% of the population in
the USA in the same year [68].The absence of networks in many             REFERENCES
rural counties means that fewer people acquire devices such as            [1]   C. Leonardi and A. Browne, "Valuing Land in Eastern
computers or laptops which in turn feeds into the high rates of                 Africa," Critical African Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1 - 13,
digital illiteracy in these communities. The ELC may have to tailor             2018.
its approach in deploying AI online resolution tools in courts in
                                                                          [2]   Land Development and Governance Institute, "An
rural counties. The interface for these applications must be simple
                                                                                Assessment of the Performace of the Environment and Land
enough to use so that even people with limited skills will find them
                                                                                Court," Land Development and Governance Institute,
easy to navigate. Moreover, in deference to the poor digital
                                                                                Nairobi, Kenya, 2014.
infrastructure in rural counties, the ODR platforms deployed should
work on simple smart phones or other devices that can work with           [3]   P. M. Syagga, "Land ownership and use in Kenya: Policy
lower bandwidth Wi-Fi and don’t need constant access to the power               prescriptions from an inequality perspective.," Readings on
grid. It is also crucial that the systems be user friendly to self-             Inequality in Kenya. Sectoral Dynamics and Perspectives,
represented litigants as well as those represented by law firms.                Nairobi., pp. 289 - 344, 2006.
      Finally, there is evidence that ODR platforms are likely to be      [4]   T. Ndege, "Evolving land tenure and agricultural systems.,"
embraced by the Kenyan populace. With the onset of the COVID                    in Ethnography of the Gusii of western Kenya: A Vanishing
– 19 pandemic many courts in Kenya are engaging in some form of                 cultural heritage., Lewistion, NY, Edwin Mellen Press. ,
ODR, from communicating with litigants via email, to utilizing                  2006.
electronic disclosure platforms to manage disclosure, submission          [5]   R. Southall, "The Ndungu report: land & graft in Kenya.,"
of documents via online portals, and even providing rulings online.             Review of African Political Economy, vol. 32, no. 103, pp.
These new procedures have ultimately been accepted, begrudgingly                142 - 151, 2005.
in some instances, within the legal sphere and by the general public.
                                                                          [6]   C. Greiner, "Pastoralism and Land‐Tenure Change in
Given this acceptance of various ODR practices by both the public
                                                                                Kenya: The Failure of Customary Institutions.,"
and legal personnel, it is reasonable to conclude that online conflict
                                                                                Development and Change., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 78 - 97, 2017.
resolution platforms would be similarly embraced. A 2020 study
also found that a majority of Kenyans are satisfied with justice          [7]   J. Munei and K. Galaty, "Maasai Land, Law, and
outcomes from the various avenues from where they seek justice –                Dispossession," Cultural Survival Quarterly Magazine,
this does not have to be in court or even within the conventional               December           1998.        [Online].        Available:
court system [69]. In fact, in general, the citizenry has greater trust         https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-
in the integrity of the judiciary compared to other governmental                survival-quarterly/maasai-land-law-and-dispossession.
institutions and because of this may be more willing to embrace                 [Accessed 21 April 2021].
LegalAIIA’21, June, 2021, Sao Paolo, Brazil                                                                          F. Ogonjo et al.

[8]   Ministry of Lands, "“Sessional Paper No. 3 of 2009 on         [23] C. Oyugi, "Kenyan Courts Record 84 % Reduction in Case
      National Land Policy," Ministry of Lands, Nairobi, Kenya,          Backlog," Reporting on Good Governance in Kenya., 21
      2009.                                                              August          2019.         [Online].       Available:
[9]   T. Yamano and K. Deininger, "Land Conflicts in Kenya:              https://roggkenya.org/2019/08/21/9720-2/. [Accessed 30
      Causes, Impacts, and Resolutions.," Foundation for                 April 2021].
      Advanced Studies on International Development, 2005.          [24] C. J. D. Maraga, Interviewee, CJ Maraga: I have no
[10] J. Mwita, “Ethnic Land Conflict a Constant Struggle in              problem with President Uhuru. [Interview]. 23 August
     Kenya: A Critical inquest on the role played by the                 2020.
     Methodist church in Meru County, Kenya., Norwegian             [25] N. Kihiu, "Land, Environment Courts In Nairobi Booked To
     School of Theology, 2017.                                           March 2021 Amid Acute Staffing Gap.," Capital News, 23
[11] T. Janus, "Natural Resource Extraction and Civil Conflict.,"        January         2020.         [Online].        Available:
     Journal of Development Economics, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 24 -          https://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2020/01/land-
     31, 2012.                                                           environment-courts-in-nairobi-booked-to-march-2021-
                                                                         amid-acute-staffing-gap/. [Accessed 27 April 2021].
[12] K. Kanyinga, "Politics and Struggles for Access to Land:
     “Grants from Above” and “Squatters” in Coastal Kenya.,"        [26] A. Adeyoju, "Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Law
     Kanyinga, K. 1998. “Politics and Struggles for Access to            Practice in Africa," 15 December 2018. [Online]. Available:
     Land: “GranEuropean Journal of Development Research ,               http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3301937. [Accessed 26 April
     vol. 10, pp. 50 - 70, 1998.                                         2021].
[13] C. Greiner, "Guns, Land, and Votes: Cattle Rustling and the    [27] LawPavillion, "LawPavilion Launches the First Legal
     Politics of Boundary (Re)making in Northern Kenya,"                 Analytics Software in Africa at the 56th Annual General
     African Affairs, vol. 112, no. 447, p. 216–237, 2013.               Conference of the NBA In Port-Harcourt.," LawPavillion,
                                                                         2016.                  [Online].                  Available:
[14] J. Klopp, "Pilfering the Public: The Problem of Land
                                                                         http://lawpavilion.com/blog/lawpavilionlaunches-the-first-
     Grabbing in Contemporary Kenya," Africa Today, vol. 47,
                                                                         legal-analytics-software-in-africa-at-the-56th-annual-
     no. 1, pp. 7 - 26, 2000.
                                                                         general-conference-of-the-nba-in-portharcourt/. [Accessed
[15] W. Abuya, "Resource Conflict in Kenya’s Titanium Mining             26 April 2021].
     Industry: Ethno-ecology and the Redefinition of
                                                                    [28] P. Ifeoma, "LawPavilion Unveils ‘TIMI’; Nigeria’s First
     Ownership, Control, and Compensation.," Development
                                                                         Artificial Intelligence Legal Assistant.," DNL Legal and
     Southern Africa., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 593 - 606, 2017.
                                                                         Style, 21 August 2018. [Online]. Available:
[16] P. A. Nyong'o, "The land question, land grabbing and                https://dnllegalandstyle.com/2018/lawpavilion-unveils-
     agriculture in Africa.," International Journal of African           timi-nigerias-first-artificial-intelligence-legal-assistant/.
     Renaissance Studies-Multi-, Inter-and Transdisciplinarity.,         [Accessed 27 April 2021].
     vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 23 - 31, 2013.
                                                                    [29] Business Daily, "‘Land Ministry in Fresh Bid to Digitise
[17] A. Manji, "The grabbed state: lawyers, politics and public          Records.," Business Daily, 18 March 2018. [Online].
     land in Kenya.," The Journal of Modern African Studies.,            Available:
     pp. 467 - 492, 2012.                                                https://www.businessdailyafrica.com/economy/Land-
[18] L. Apiyo, "Land-grabbing” and evictions in Kenya.,"                 ministry-in-fresh-bid-to-digitise-records/3946234-
     Habitat Debate., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 18 - 19, 1998.                  4347056-goa3sg/index.html. [Accessed 26 April 2021].
[19] "Environment and Land Courts," Judiciary, [Online].            [30] "Lands Ministry Wants Orders Stopping Digitisation
     Available:                                                          Lifted," Daily Nation, 2018. [Online]. Available:
     https://www.judiciary.go.ke/courts/environment-and-land-            https://www.nation.co.kehttps/www.nation.co.ke/dailynati
     court/. [Accessed 24 April 2021].                                   on/news/lands-ministry-wants-orders-stopping-
[20] The Judiciary of Kenya, "State of the Judiciary and the             digitisation-lifted--38664. [Accessed 26 April 2021].
     Administration of Justice Annual Report 2018 - 2019," The      [31] K. Muthoni, "Lawyers sue ministry over digitisation of land
     Judiciary of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya, 2019.                           records," The Standard, 17 April 2018. [Online]. Available:
[21] The Judiciary of Kenya, "State of the Judiciary and the             https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/nairobi/article/20012772
     Administration of Justice Annual Report 2019 - 2020," The           26/lsk-sues-ministry-over-online-land-transactions.
     Judiciary of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya, 2020.                           [Accessed 26 April 2021].
[22] J. Makau, Factors Influencing Managemet of Case Backlog        [32] K. Mwanza, "Kenyan lawyers wrangle with government
     in Judiciary in Kenya: A Case of Courts within Meru and             over land registry digitization," Thomson Reuters
     Tharaka Nithi Counties., Nairobi, Kenya: University of              Foundation, 7 May 2018. [Online]. Available:
     Nairobi, 2014.                                                      https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kenya-landrights-
                                                                         idUSKBN1I81K1. [Accessed 30 April 2021].
Utilizing AI to Improve Efficiency of the Environment and Land
                                                                                      LegalAIIA’21, June, 2021, Sao Paolo, Brazil
Court in the Kenyan Judiciary

[33] K. Muigua, "Legal Practice and New Frontiers: Embracing       [44] Ministry of Information, Communications and Technology,
     Technology for Enhanced Efficiency and Access to                   "National Information, Communications and Technology
     Justice,"    June     2020.      [Online].    Available:           (ICT) Policy," Ministry of Information, Communications
     http://kmco.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Legal-                and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya, 2019.
     Practice-and-New-Frontiers-Embracing-Technology-for-          [45] J. Mugendi, "Challenges in Implementing Digital
     Enhanced-Efficiency-and-Access-to-Justice-Kariuki-                 Technologies in Rural Kenya," Engineering for Change, 15
     Muigua-Ph.D-June-2020.pdf. [Accessed 26 April 2021].               December         2020.        [Online].         Available:
[34] D. Lat, "How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming Legal         https://www.engineeringforchange.org/news/challenges-
     Research," Above the Law 2020, [Online]. Available:                implementing-digital-technologies-rural-kenya/. [Accessed
     https://abovethelaw.com/law2020/how-artificial-                    10 June 2021].
     intelligence-is-transforming-legal-research/. [Accessed 30    [46] D. Louisell and M. Pirsig, "The Significance of Verbatim
     April 2021].                                                       Recording of Proceedings in American Adjudication,"
[35] M. Neary and S. Chen, "Artificial Intelligence: Legal              Minnesota Law Review, vol. 1100, 1953.
     Research and Law Librarians," AALL Spectrum, vol. 21, no.     [47] Star Reporter, "State to digitise courts, create jobs for
     5, pp. 16 - 20, 2017.                                              youth," The Star, 15 March 2019. [Online]. Available:
[36] A. Wilkinson, "How Natural Language Processing Can                 https://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2019-03-15-state-to-
     Improve Legal Search Results," Kira, 20 July 2020.                 digitise-courts-create-jobs-for-youth/. [Accessed 26 April
     [Online]. Available: https://kirasystems.com/learn/how-            2021].
     natural-language-processing-improving-can-improve-            [48] B. Worthy, "Word Error Rate Mechanism, ASR
     legal-search-results/. [Accessed 30 April 2021].                   Transcription and Challenges in Accuracy Measurement,"
[37] N. Black, "Lawyers have a bevy of advanced and AI-                 GMR         Transcription,     [Online].       Available:
     enhanced legal research tools at their fingertips," ABA            https://www.gmrtranscription.com/blog/word-error-rate-
     Journal, 22 November 2019. [Online]. Available:                    mechanism-asr-transcription-and-challenges-in-accuracy-
     https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/lawyers-have-a-             measurement. [Accessed 30 April 2021].
     bevy-of-advanced-and-ai-enhanced-legal-research-tools-        [49] Verbit Editorial, "Why AI Transcription is a Court
     at-their-fingertips. [Accessed 30 April 2021].                     Reporter’s Secret Weapon," Verbit, 17 February 2019.
[38] National Legal Research Group, Inc., "The real impact of           [Online]. Available: https://verbit.ai/why-ai-transcription-
     using artificial intelligence in legal research.," National        is-a-court-reporters-secret-weapon/. [Accessed 26 April
     Legal Research Group, Inc., Charlottesville, VA, 2018.             2021].
[39] J. Waguma, "Kenya’s Judiciary Ups Online Game," Africa        [50] K. Wiggers, "Study finds that even the best speech
     Legal,     8    June     2020.    [Online].    Available:          recognition systems exhibit bias," Venture Beat, 1 April
     https://www.africa-legal.com/news-detail/kenya-s-                  2021.                  [Online].                Available:
     judiciary-ups-online-game. [Accessed 12 June 2021].                https://venturebeat.com/2021/04/01/study-finds-that-even-
[40] The Judiciary of Kenya, "Sustaining Judiciary                      the-best-speech-recognition-systems-exhibit-bias/.
     Transformation (SJT): A Service Delivery Agenda 2017 -             [Accessed 30 April 2021].
     2020," The Judiciary of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya, 2017.          [51] F. Ilma, "How and Why AI-Powered Transcription Services
[41] ICT Authority, "Digitisation," ICT Authority, [Online].            are Taking the Legal Industry by Storm," Tarajama, 30
     Available: https://icta.go.ke/digitisation/. [Accessed 30          August           2020.          [Online].         Available:
     April 202`].                                                       https://www.tarjama.com/how-and-why-ai-powered-
                                                                        transcription-services-are-taking-the-legal-industry-by-
[42] Ministry of Land and Physical Planning, "Digital land
                                                                        storm/. [Accessed 27 April 2021].
     transaction platform to curb fraud, says President
     Kenyatta," Ministry of Land and Physical Planning,            [52] S. Brewster, "New York Times Wirecutter," New York
     Republic of Kenya, 27 April 2021. [Online]. Available:             Times,      30    June     2020.    [Online].    Available:
     https://lands.go.ke/digital-land-transaction-platform-to-          https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-
     curb-fraud-says-president-kenyatta/. [Accessed 9 June              transcription-services/. [Accessed 9 June 2021].
     2021].                                                        [53] Qual Transcribe, "Legal Transcription Services," Qual
[43] J. Kariuki, W. Karugu and M. Okode, "Challenges Facing             Transcribe,       2020.       [Online].        Available:
     Digitization Projects in Kenya: Case of Implementation of          https://www.qualtranscribe.com/deposition-transcription.
     National Land Information Management System.,"                     [Accessed 14 June 2021].
     International Journal of Technology and Systems, vol. 3,      [54] L. Baum, The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior, Ann Arbor,
     no. 1, pp. 23 - 42, 2018.                                          Michigan: University of Michigan Press., 2009.
LegalAIIA’21, June, 2021, Sao Paolo, Brazil                                                                         F. Ogonjo et al.

[55] M. Hall and R. Wright, "Systematic Content Analysis of          [68] GSMA, "Mobile Internet Connectivity 2019: Sub-Saharan
     Judicial Opinions.," California Law Review, vol. 96, no. 1,          Africa Factsheet," GSMA, 2019.
     pp. 63 - 122, 2008.                                             [69] AfroBarometer, "Access to justice in Kenya: experience and
[56] F. Schauer, "Prediction and Particularity," Boston                   perception," IDS-University of Nairobi in partnership with
     University Law Review, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 773 - 790, 1998.          Katiba Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, 2020.
[57] X. Nuo, P. Wang, L. Chen, L. Pan, X. Wang and J. Zhao,
     "Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment
     Prediction.," in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of
     the Association for Computational Linguistics., 2020.
[58] L. Eliot, "Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) Amid the
     Advent of Autonomous AI Legal Reasoning," Cornell
     University, Ithaca, NY, 2020.
[59] D. Katz, "Quantitative legal prediction-or-how i learned to
     stop worrying and start preparing for the data-driven future
     of the legal services industry.," Emory Law J., vol. 62, p.
     909, 2012.
[60] P. Wongchaisuwat, D. Klabjan and J. McGinnis,
     "Predicting litigation likelihood and time to litigation for
     patents.," in Proceedings of the 16th edition of the
     international conference on articial intelligence and law.,
     2017.
[61] D. Katz, M. I. Bommarito and J. Blackman, " A general
     approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court
     of the United States.," PloS ONE, vol. 12, no. 4, p.
     e0174698, 2017.
[62] M. Medvedeva, M. Vols and M. Wieling, "Using machine
     learning to predict decisions of the European Court of
     Human Rights.," Artifical Intelligence and Law, vol. 28, pp.
     237- 266, 2019.
[63] A. D'Amato, "Legal Realism Explains Nothing,"
     Northwestern School of Law, Evanston, Illinois, 2010.
[64] E. Ntoutsi, P. Fafalios, U. Gadiraju, V. Iosifidis, W. Nejdl,
     M. E. Vidal, S. Ruggieri, F. Turini, S. Papadoulos, E.
     Krasanakis, I. Komptasiaris, K. Kinder - Kurlanda, C.
     Wagner, F. Karimi, M. Fernandez, H. Alani, B. Berendt and
     S. Staab, "Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence
     systems—An introductory survey.," Wiley Interdisciplinary
     Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery., vol. 10,
     no. 3, 2020.
[65] S. Nagel, "Predicting and Reducing Court-Case Time
     through Simple Logic," North Carolina Law Review, vol.
     60, no. 1, 1981.
[66] The Judiciary of Kenya, " State of the Judiciary and the
     Administration of Justice Annual Report, 2017 – 2018," The
     Judiciary of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya, 2017.
[67] J. Wu, "AI Goes to Court: The Growing Landscape of AI
     for Access to Justice," Stanford Legal Design Lab, 6 August
     2019. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/legal-
     design-and-innovation/ai-goes-to-court-the-growing-
     landscape-of-ai-for-access-to-justice-3f58aca4306f.
     [Accessed 27 April 2021].