<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Memes to an End: A Look into what makes a Meme O ensive?</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>School of Computing</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Communications</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Lancaster University</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>UK mail@kieranhill.xyz</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>School of Computing Science, University of Glasgow</institution>
          ,
          <country country="UK">UK</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Using memes is a popular method of online communication, including both lighthearted and dark humor as well as polarizing subjects. But what makes a meme o ensive? Does this depend on a meme's content or format? Does a meme o ensiveness vary across audiences? In order to answer these questions, we recruit 316 participants to score two sets of meme variants in terms of their o ensiveness. We augment this with interviews to extract additional insights.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Memes</kwd>
        <kwd>Internet meme</kwd>
        <kwd>O ending content</kwd>
        <kwd>Online abuse</kwd>
        <kwd>Media consumption</kwd>
        <kwd>Social medium</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>An Internet meme (or just meme) is a multimodal medium of communicating
a certain message using the juxtaposition of textual and visual formats. This
commonly takes the form of a brief comment over an image referencing pop
culture, politics, or social issues. An example of a meme is shown in Figure 1.</p>
      <p>
        Memes have been very widely used in social media of various types and in
innumerable languages [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The use of memes has helped accelerate the formation
and evolution of Internet subcultures of di erent types; cf. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Anecdotally, memes are quite e cient at delivering a complex message in a
succinct way. Generally, this is due to the mix of text and visual content (in
image or video format), which allows for almost immediate portrayal of context
and illustration of contrast. This also allows low-e ort embedding into trending
phenomena, as well as crossing cultural and language barriers.</p>
      <p>
        The signi cant role of memes in modern online culture and society in general
is well documented [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21 ref3 ref4">3,4,21</xref>
        ]. We are interested in the common use of memes by
Internet subcultures that exhibit counter-cultural, abusive or hate attitudes, such
as far-right subreddits and politically incorrect 4chan boards. Given such
prominent use in social media where it is easily exploited to spread misinformation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>
        ]
even mobilizing voters [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref20">11,20</xref>
        ], we are motivated to identify the characteristics of
a meme that enables it to deliver a potentially in ammatory or o ensive point
of view. We are also motivated to investigate how this varies across audiences of
varied demographics.
      </p>
      <p>We carry out a randomized controlled trial to answer the above questions. We
recruit a total of 316 participants to review two di erent groups of potentially
o ensive memes, and ask them to quantitatively score their reaction towards
them. We also invite them to provide qualitative feedback. Consequently, we
are able to draw some fundamental insights into the nature of memes. This
is the rst study of its kind to try to isolate, using mixed methods analysis,
the characteristics of a meme that makes it palatable or o ensive to di erent
audiences.</p>
      <p>In the remainder of this paper we will be using politically incorrect and
potentially in ammatory language as and when context dictates. Section 2 brie y
surveys related work. Section 3 describes our methodology for collecting memes,
recruiting participants, and designing the survey. Section 4 presents the results of
our study. Section 5 re ects on the results and discusses their wider implications.
Section 6 concludes and outlines future work.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Related Work</title>
      <p>
        Memes play a signi cant role in modern online culture [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21 ref3 ref4">3,4,21</xref>
        ] and indeed in
society at large. For instance, several studies have looked into the e ect of memes
on the rhetoric and voter mobilization of alt-right political groups during the
2016 US Presidential Election [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11 ref14 ref18 ref20">10,20,11,14,18</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Various works have been published on the spread of memes in online
media. Shifman [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
        ] studied features that help a creative derivative culture around
YouTube memes. Guadagno et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ] analyzed emotional response to memes and
what contributes to one going viral, while Huntington [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ] looked into a meme's
persuasiveness and e ect on online political engagement. Neither study
investigated a meme's potential to cause o ense. Zannettou et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>
        ] followed the
spread of memes across online platforms, and observed the popularity of memes
in racist online forums and fringe Internet subcultures. Johann and Bulow [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ]
investigated reasons for uptake in meme use, and attributed success to adoption
by journalists. They also highlighted how novelty of meme derivatives through
image editing increases di usion. Lonnberg et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ] built models of meme
spread, incorporating the users who help it spread and their willingness to do
so. Other studies focused on developing methods to automatically recognize
memes [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19 ref2 ref23">2,19,23</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Yoon [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>
        ] found deep rooted racist tendencies in using memes, using
colorblindness as pretext without acknowledging the adverse e ects of the implied
racist message. Williams and Dupuis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>
        ] used memes to study the correlation
between political a liation and levels of personal openness and dispositional
a ects.
      </p>
      <p>Despite all of this interest, however, our work is the rst (trial or
observational) to dive into why some memes could be more o ensive than others.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Methodology</title>
      <p>We utilized a set of `real' memes collected from Reddit, and complemented them
with synthesized ones in order to vary a certain feature of the meme whilst
controlling the others. We designed a survey to collect data on perceived emotions
from a large number of user of di erent backgrounds.
3.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Meme collection and creation</title>
        <p>We collected a set of memes from the /r/ImGoingToHellForThis subreddit
where o ensive content is typically posted. The memes, collected in
NovemberDecember 2019, covered a variety of sensitive subjects such as politics, religion,
and race. We attempted to select a variety of meme formats to appeal to di erent
audiences. However, we aimed not to choose memes that are highly topical in
order to minimize the e ect of context or trendiness on meme perception.</p>
        <p>We focus in this study on the two main features that constitute a meme:
image format and textual message. In order to identify the degree to which each
can play on perception of o ense, we vary one while keeping the other the same
as in the original meme collected from Reddit. We used MemeGenerator.com
to alter either the format or text to include in the survey variants. When text
is changed, a message from another /r/ImGoingToHellForThis meme is used.
Examples are shown in Figures 2{3, with the full list included in Table 1. All
memes could be accessed at https://github.com/kieranhill97/Memeology/.</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-1">
          <title>6 PXabrooxdiSeesries X</title>
          <p>7 Crying woman
8 Troll quotes</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-2">
          <title>9 BRaotbminan slapping</title>
          <p>10 I am speed
11 Idadmonn'tvewgaenttabalneys</p>
          <p>Theme
Social niceties
Atomic bombings</p>
          <p>Meme
I'm kind of
retarded
Pro gamer move</p>
          <p>Theme
Web culture
Murder, Gaming
In delity, Domestic Keep your secrets Abandonment
abuse
Sexuality Race</p>
          <p>Starter packs</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-3">
          <title>Death, Parenthood eSvtailr Wars good vs Death, Parenthood</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-4">
          <title>Religion PXabrooxdiSeesries X 9/11</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-5">
          <title>Disability, Poverty wAiftrhicaankkniidfecrying Disability, Poverty</title>
          <p>Assassination
(Lincoln)
Poverty
Suicide
Disability (child)
Troll quotes
I worry about you
sometimes,
Candice
I am speed
I don't want any
damn vegetables</p>
          <p>Assassination
(Kennedy)
Poverty
Race
Disability (sibling)
Atomic bombings,
Race
Gender, Trump
12 Plants vs Zombies Atomic bombings
Rice Krispies
13 She can't do that
Gender, Religion
14 Roll safe
Death
15 tWhahnat2's4 funnier Nazism
16 Careful, he's a hero Gender
17 Daily struggle Slavery
18 aWcoamt an yelling at Gender
19 Nut button Terrorism
20 Surprised Pikachu Terrorism
She can't do that
When Your</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-6">
          <title>PWahreenretsAAllskYour Death</title>
          <p>Money Went
tWhahnat2's4 funnier 9/11
Careful, he's a hero Race, Murder
Daily struggle Murder, Cancer
Who would win
Highway exit turn
Surprised Pikachu</p>
          <p>Gender
Terrorism
Abuse
We used a survey questionnaire as the tool to collect input speci cally due to
its inherent nature of disconnecting the participant from the researcher and
also from other participants (as in a focus group). The aim was to help the
participants answer freely without feeling implicit pressure to select a politically
correct answer when faced with a polarizing topic.</p>
          <p>The survey had 2 variants, each with 20 memes. The size was calibrated to
sustain participant interest throughout the survey and elicit earnest responses.
Upon start, each participant was assigned one of the 2 sets based on a simple
round robin protocol. The corresponding questions in each survey matched each
other in either visual format or textual content. Variation was made between
sets to identify the characteristic of the meme that has potential to cause more
o ense. Each question asked the participants how o ended the meme made them
feel on a 5-point Likert scale between `Not o ensive at all' and `Extremely
offensive'. Subjects were informed at the beginning of the survey that the study
was intended to o end and that the memes do not represent the views of the
researchers. The survey was IRB approved.</p>
          <p>At the end of the survey, participants were asked to indicate if they are willing
to answer follow-up open-ended questions.
3.3</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Participant recruitment</title>
        <p>Between February 23rd and 26th 2020, di erent social media (namely Reddit,
Facebook, and Twitter) were used to spread the survey in an attempt to make
the group of participants as diverse as possible in terms of online culture. We
also recruited locally on our university campus. Demographic information was
collected for summary statistics but all responses were anonymized.</p>
        <p>Participation was limited to a single response linked to a Google account
in order to prevent multiple responses from skewing the data. This restriction
limited participation to those with a Google account and were willing to use
it to sign in. There were 550 visits to the survey landing page, 320 of which
completed the survey (a response rate of 57.5%). 4 results had to be disregarded
due to incomplete data, resulting in 316 valid responses. Of these, 37 participants
provided further input in the form of answers to our open-ended questions.
4</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Result Analysis</title>
      <p>In this section we present and examine the results of the study.
4.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Participant demographics</title>
        <p>
          First, we inspect how our round robin assignment of survey a ected the
participant demographics of each survey set. This resulted in fairly equivalent sets, as
is depicted in Figures 4{5. The only observable disparity is in the frequency of
meme usage, but the di erence is not statistically signi cant.
To systematically identify the di erence in scores between corresponding
questions of the two surveys (shown in Figure 6), we used the t -test and
MannWhitney-Wilcoxon methods. Both are non-parametric and produce statistically
signi cant results [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
          ]. We found the results of the t -test to be a little more
sensitive to di erences in survey scores (Figure 7). This method identi ed the
following questions as those with highly signi cant di erences across surveys
(p &lt; 0:01): Q3, Q6, Q9, Q12, Q13, and Q17. Furthermore, the ones with signi
cant di erences (0:01 &lt; p &lt; 0:05) were identi ed as: Q2, Q5, and Q10. We now
discuss our observations that account for these di erences.
4.3
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Form vs. substance</title>
        <p>Participant response seems to be associated with the message of a meme more
than with its visual aspects. This can be particularly observed in Q7, Q8, Q11,</p>
        <p>Q18 and Q19 where the message was constant while the meme changed.
Exceptions are Q5, Q9, and Q14, which can be attributed to slightly awkward
meme use when the same message was retained without adjustment while the
meme changed. In e ect, the framing in most cases seems less e ective than the
content.</p>
        <p>Similarly, this is also observed in instances where the meme is reused with a
di erent message (such as Q3, Q13, and Q17) where it can be signi cantly more
or less o ensive depending on the content. Interestingly, though, 86% of those
interviewed after the survey provided input that agreed with the statement \the
format of a meme can change its meaning", which is contrary to what the data
shows us.
4.4</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>Theme matters</title>
        <p>The theme of tragic events, especially large-scale ones (e.g., the atomic bombings
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki) are consistently received as being more o ensive.
This is evident from the signi cant changes in Q2, Q6, Q12, and from the lack
thereof in Q15 where both themes were large-scale tragic events (The Holocaust
and 9/11, respectively). Moreover, combining more than one o ensive theme
tends to garner higher scores signaling higher level of perceived o ense. Examples
include Q3 and Q12. An exception is Q17 where the theme of slavery was more
o ensive than murder and cancer combined.</p>
        <p>Some themes were deemed to be less o ensive than expected, such as religion.
However, we avoid to draw any conclusion on this as we did not collect nor control
for participants' religious and spiritual beliefs.
4.5</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-4">
        <title>The demographic e ect</title>
        <p>We observed some associations between participant demographics and response
to memes. Although no extremely strong correlations were detected, a few
deserve remark (Figure 8). Most obvious, perhaps, is that age is a fairly good
indicator of the frequency of meme use. A stronger correlation, however, exists
between a participant's gender3 and how easily o ended they are by the memes.
Moreover, gender is also moderately correlated to varying Likert scores using
median absolute deviation, a robust measure of variability. Essentially, female
participants were more likely to use the full range of the Likert scale over the
various survey questions, while many male participants tended to score using
only part of the scale, e.g., between 1 and 3. Non-binary gender participants
showed no distinguishable tendency. Elsewhere, participants who signi ed that
they are easily o ended did indeed score higher and with more variability.
Finally, participant location showed no signi cant correlation with scores.
5</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>We now discuss the implications and limitations of the above results, and
comment on threats to validity.
5.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>Automated analysis of meme e ect</title>
        <p>
          Based on our ndings in Section 4.3, the automated detection of potential o ense
and, similarly, misinformation in memes might be easier than anticipated as
it is more dependent on the textual rather than visual elements of a meme.
Fortunately, textual analysis methods are more advanced and readily available
3 After removing those who withheld their gender (7), but keeping non-binary answers.
than visual ones. Thus, we propose the development of systems to predict the
e ect of a meme in terms of its o ense as an important future direction. This
would be useful for detecting misinformation as well as commercial uses such
as advertising campaigns. Most e orts to date on automated analysis of memes
have focused on distribution, identi cation and clustering [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27 ref7 ref8">8,27,7</xref>
          ].
5.2
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>A meme as a humorous Trojan Horse</title>
        <p>
          Some attribute the success of memes to its reliance on humor as a tool, which
allows its creator to `soften the blow' of the contained message [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ]. This is
certainly true for political use; Miltner comments that \the humorous nature of
memes [. . . ] makes them an ideal venue for political critique and commentary"
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ]. This is one reason why memes tend to be quite common in online political
culture [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16 ref18 ref20 ref5 ref6">16,20,5,18,6</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>This inherent property has the potential to be exploited to mask the o
ensive disposition of the message, or equally political critique or misrepresented
information within. In other words, using memes makes it slightly more
easier to `swallow the pill' of a message that is otherwise less palatable due to its
o ensive or misleading character.</p>
        <p>However, there seems to be a limit to this capacity to subvert. Our results are
encouraging as they indicate that it is more di cult to dress a overtly o ensive
message with the humorous visual elements of a meme. More work is needed to
investigate if this also applies to other emotions that a meme can trigger, and
the potential to carry misinformation.
5.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-3">
        <title>Threats to validity</title>
        <p>In our study, we do not aim to establish any causal relationships hence threats
to internal validity are minimal. Survey results are susceptible to be swayed by
any biases that the participants already have. This aspect is di cult to control
in an anonymous online survey without an additional step to calibrate
perspectives, and by signi cantly increasing sample size. Although we comment on the
correlations we observe, we are cautious not to generalize in order to mitigate
threats to external validity.</p>
        <p>There are some threats to construct validity due to the nature of how memes
are created, and we did notice this e ect with a few memes (see Section 4).
Furthermore, memes seldom live in isolation and are typically part of a wider
discussion that is context- and community-speci c. As such, there will always
be a degree of threat to construct validity with synthesizing memes purely for
research purposes.
6</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Conclusion and Future Work</title>
      <p>Through a randomized controlled trial, we studied how di erent memes are
received as being o ensive or otherwise. We established an understanding of the
importance of a meme's content as opposed to just its visual and cultural aspects.
We also uncovered some relationships between user demographics and how likely
they are to being o ended by a meme. As such, our work helps address a gap in
terms of how sensitive or polarizing messages could be interpreted by di erent
audiences. This knowledge is important not just in understanding how the
potential of propagating certain messages through the medium of memes, but also
how controversial opinions (due to political, racial, religious, etc. perspectives)
can have varied e ects. We also discussed the degree to which a meme could be
used as a delivery vehicle to normalize what is arguably controversial, extreme,
or misleading. However, this area requires more research which is a future target
of ours.</p>
      <p>There are numerous other directions for future work. Further investigation
could be made into the relationship between the timeliness of a meme and its
o ense e ect. How this may vary across topics, online communities, and social
platforms are all interesting question. Another interesting direction is to
investigate the possible dependency of the `memorability' of a meme and its inherent
properties.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Agarwal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garimella</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Joglekar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sastry</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tyson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>Characterising user content on a multi-lingual social network (</article-title>
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Beskow</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kumar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carley</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The evolution of political memes: Detecting and characterizing internet memes with multi-modal deep learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>Information Processing &amp; Management</source>
          <volume>57</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <volume>102170</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.
          <year>2019</year>
          .102170
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3. Borzsei, L.K.:
          <article-title>Makes a meme instead: A concise history of internet memes</article-title>
          .
          <source>New Media Studies Magazine</source>
          <volume>7</volume>
          (
          <year>Mar 2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Breheny</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>"By any memes necessary": Exploring the intersectional politics of feminist memes on Instagram</article-title>
          .
          <source>Master's thesis</source>
          , Uppsala University, Media and Communication
          <string-name>
            <surname>Studies</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>Jun 2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chagas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Freire</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rios</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Magalha~es, D.:
          <article-title>Political memes and the politics of memes: A methodological proposal for content analysis of online political memes</article-title>
          .
          <source>First Monday</source>
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ) (
          <year>Feb 2019</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i2.
          <fpage>7264</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dean</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Sorted for memes and gifs: Visual media and everyday digital politics</article-title>
          .
          <source>Political Studies Review</source>
          <volume>17</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <volume>255</volume>
          {
          <fpage>266</fpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918807483
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Du</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Masood</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Joseph</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Understanding visual memes: An empirical analysis of text superimposed on memes shared on twitter</article-title>
          .
          <source>International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <volume>153</volume>
          {164 (May
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ferrara</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>JafariAsbagh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Varol</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Qazvinian</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Menczer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Flammini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Clustering memes in social media</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>548</volume>
          {
          <issue>555</issue>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1145/2492517.2492530
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guadagno</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rempala</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Murphy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Okdie</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>What makes a video go viral? an analysis of emotional contagion and internet memes</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers in Human Behavior</source>
          <volume>29</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <volume>2312</volume>
          {
          <fpage>2319</fpage>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <volume>04</volume>
          .016
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10. Heikkila, N.:
          <article-title>Online antagonism of the alt-right in the 2016 election</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Journal of American Studies</source>
          <volume>12</volume>
          (
          <issue>12-2</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Heiskanen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Meme-ing electoral participation</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Journal of American Studies</source>
          <volume>12</volume>
          (
          <issue>12-2</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huntington</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The A ect and E ect of Internet Memes: Assessing perceptions and in uence of online user-generated political discourse as media</article-title>
          .
          <source>Ph.D. thesis</source>
          , Colorado State University (
          <year>Sep 2017</year>
          ), https://hdl.handle.
          <source>net/10217/183936</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Johann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Bulow, L.:
          <article-title>One does not simply create a meme: conditions for the di usion of internet memes</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Communication</source>
          <volume>13</volume>
          ,
          <issue>23</issue>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lincoln</surname>
          </string-name>
          , T.C.
          <article-title>: A(meme)rican Politics: Gender Representation in Political Memes of the 2016 Election. Master's thesis</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Rochester Institute of Technology (Aug</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          ), https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses/10116/
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lonnberg</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Xiao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Wol nger, K.:
          <article-title>The growth, spread, and mutation of internet phenomena: A study of memes</article-title>
          .
          <source>Results in Applied Mathematics</source>
          <volume>6</volume>
          ,
          <issue>100092</issue>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinam.
          <year>2020</year>
          .100092
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mart</surname>
            nez-Rolan,
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Pin~eiro-</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Otero</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al.:
          <article-title>The use of memes in the discourse of political parties on twitter: analysing the 2015 state of the nation debate</article-title>
          .
          <source>Communication &amp; Society</source>
          <volume>29</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <volume>145</volume>
          {
          <fpage>160</fpage>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Miltner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Internet memes</article-title>
          .
          <source>The SAGE handbook of social</source>
          media pp.
          <volume>412</volume>
          {
          <issue>428</issue>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18. Moody-Ramirez,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Church</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A.B.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Analysis of facebook meme groups used during the 2016 US presidential election</article-title>
          .
          <source>Social Media + Society</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2019</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118808799
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          19.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Perez-Martin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bustos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Saldana</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Semantic search of memes on twitter (</article-title>
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          20.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ross</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rivers</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.J.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Digital cultures of political participation: Internet memes and the discursive delegitimization of the 2016 u.s presidential candidates</article-title>
          .
          <source>Discourse, Context &amp; Media</source>
          <volume>16</volume>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <volume>01</volume>
          .001
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          21.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rowett</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The strategic need to understand online memes and modern information warfare theory</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: International Conference on Big Data</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>4437</volume>
          {
          <fpage>4442</fpage>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>IEEE</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.
          <year>2018</year>
          .8622051
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          22.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shifman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>An anatomy of a youtube meme</article-title>
          .
          <source>New Media &amp; Society</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <volume>187</volume>
          {
          <fpage>203</fpage>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811412160
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          23.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Theisen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brogan</surname>
            , J., Thomas,
            <given-names>P.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Moreira</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Phoa</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weninger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Scheirer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Automatic discovery of political meme genres with diverse appearances (</article-title>
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          24.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Williams</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dupuis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>I don't always spread disinformation on the web, but when i do i like to use memes: An examination of memes in the spread of disinformation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: International Multi-Conference on Complexity, Informatics and Cybernetics</source>
          (IMCIC) (
          <year>Mar 2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          25. de Winter,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.F.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Dodou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>D.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Five-point likert items: t test versus mann-whitneywilcoxon</article-title>
          .
          <source>Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 15</source>
          ,
          <issue>11</issue>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.7275/bj1p-ts64
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          26.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yoon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Why is it not just a joke? analysis of internet memes associated with racism and hidden ideology of colorblindness</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education</source>
          <volume>33</volume>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          27.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zannettou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Caul eld, T.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Blackburn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>De Cristofaro</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sirivianos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stringhini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Suarez-Tangil</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>On the origins of memes by means of fringe web communities</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Internet Measurement Conference</source>
          . p.
          <volume>188</volume>
          {
          <fpage>202</fpage>
          . IMC '18,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1145/3278532.3278550
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>