<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Discovering Organizational Knowledge via Process Mining</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jing Yang</string-name>
          <email>roy.j.yang@qut.edu.au</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Queensland University of Technology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Brisbane</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AU">Australia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>41</fpage>
      <lpage>48</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Deploying exible and proper organizational structures facilitates modern organizations in managing their business processes and the employees involved. To achieve this capability, it requires decision-makers to keep accurate and timely knowledge of their employee groupings. Process mining can help address this need by mining organizational models from event logs, which provide insights on actual resource groupings in the context of business process execution. This PhD research focuses on ful lling key research gaps in this sub eld of process mining, and aims at developing a systematic approach and tool that provide evidence-based support for organizations to understand, evaluate, and improve human resource groupings by using event log data.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Process Mining</kwd>
        <kwd>Organizational Model Mining</kwd>
        <kwd>Event Logs</kwd>
        <kwd>Conformance Checking</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The management of human resources in process execution forms an important
perspective in business process management. It is crucial for an organization
to have exible and proper structures around its human resources, especially
when facing dynamic demand and uctuation of employees. A key component
in designing organizational structures is to identify the grouping together of
employees [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. Therefore, to deploy e ective organizational structures,
decisionmakers need to maintain accurate and timely understanding of human resource
groupings in their organizations. However, such a need can hardly be su ced by
relying on high-level, static organizational charts or the anecdotal knowledge of
managers | neither of them o ers precise or up-to-date information on resource
groupings with respect to the constantly evolving business processes.
      </p>
      <p>
        In the meantime, analytics performed on employee-related data [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]
contributes to deriving detailed and objective insights that connect human
resourcerelated decisions with organizational performance [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. In particular, event logs
extracted from Process-Aware Information Systems [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ] can be used as a data
source for analyzing human resources in the context of process execution. Event
logs record the observation of how activities were originated by human resources
when executing some process instances at some certain time. Thus, event log
data can be utilized for mining knowledge about the behavior and structures of
human resources involved in business processes.
      </p>
      <p>Process mining is a discipline that studies knowledge discovery from event log
data to facilitate business process improvement. One of its sub elds, known as
organizational model mining, concerns speci cally the organizational structures
relevant to process execution, thus o ers a promising approach to the analytics
of resource groupings using event log data. However, research on organizational
model mining remains largely under-explored, compared to many other topics
in process mining. As evidenced in our literature review, several research gaps
remain open and limit the insights on human resource groupings gained from
mining event logs.</p>
      <p>To this end, the proposed PhD project focuses on the topic of organizational
model mining. We aim to address the key research gaps by developing a
systematic approach consisting of methods and software tools to provide evidence-based
support for organizations to understand, evaluate and improve their human
resource groupings based on event log data.</p>
      <p>The remainder of this report is structured as follows. Section 2 reviews the
literature. Section 3 elaborates on the research questions. Section 4 discusses the
research design. Section 5 summarizes the current progress. Finally, Section 6
outlines the expected contributions of this research.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Literature Review</title>
      <p>Organizational model mining is the focus of this research and one of the four
topics of process mining from the organizational perspective. To analyze the
literature, we employed the classic view of discovery, conformance, and
enhancement. The following shows the results.</p>
      <p>Discovery. This is the most common topic addressed in the existing
organizational model mining research. Given an event log as input, an organizational
model is constructed to describe the actual resource groupings in the related
process. Our literature analysis shows three issues in terms of model discovery.</p>
      <p>
        A typical input event log often records information on multiple dimensions
of process execution, i.e., activity, case, and time. However, the majority of the
extant discovery methods (e.g., [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref6">6,2</xref>
        ]) consider merely the activity dimension, for
example, the frequency of resources executing similar activities or the handover
of work between resources executing consecutive activities. On the other hand,
information related to case and time is rarely explored. Only [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] exploits log
information on resources participating in the same cases for discovering
organizational models. As a result, organizational models in the literature are unable to
capture resource groupings that follow patterns on the case and time dimension,
for example, project teams and shift workers.
      </p>
      <p>
        Uncovering the groupings of resources is addressed by most of the
literature. However, only a few existing works (e.g., [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]) describe how the discovered
resource groups were involved in process execution. The lack of description of
resource groups poses a challenge to understanding the behavior and performance
of groups based on discovered organizational models.
      </p>
      <p>
        The last issue concerns the evaluation of discovery outputs, for which there
are three strategies in the literature. The rst one compares the discovery results
with domain knowledge, such as o cial organizational structures [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref6">6,2</xref>
        ]. Clearly,
this relies on the availability of prior knowledge, while risks being awed as there
is no guarantee whether the reality has already deviated from the referenced
information. The second strategy is assessing the e ectiveness of the techniques
applied for model discovery. Such evaluations depend on speci c techniques, and
hence organizational models discovered using di erent techniques cannot be
compared on the same basis. The third strategy considers evaluation by validating
the feasibility of proposed methods through experiments on synthetic or real-life
event logs, e.g., [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. So far, none of the existing studies has explicitly considered
using input event logs as references for evaluating the discovery results.
Conformance. For conformance checking, both an event log and an
organizational model are required as inputs, and the outputs are the commonalities or
discrepancies found after comparing the log data with the model. Checking the
conformance of organizational models can support the evaluation of human
resource groupings by exploring their behavior using event logs.
      </p>
      <p>
        Based on reviewing the literature, it is found that no existing research on
organizational model mining directly addresses the issue of conformance checking.
Instead, the most relevant topics are rule mining (e.g., [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]) and multi-perspective
conformance checking (e.g., [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]). However, it is worth mentioning that neither
concerns group-level issues but rather focuses on individual resources.
Enhancement. The enhancement issue refers to exploiting event log data for
extending or improving existing models. Enhancing organizational models can
provide actionable knowledge to decision-making in terms of how to apply the
insights from discovery and conformance checking to improve resource groupings.
      </p>
      <p>
        Some literature has studied how to extend organizational models using event
logs. Examples include enriching a set of resource groups with interaction
information [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] in order to reveal communication patterns among groups; and
utilizing time information to track the changes of organizational models over
a certain period of time [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. On the other hand, some have researched how to
improve existing organizational models through simulation, e.g., in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] event log
data is used for analyzing and reducing the communication costs among resources
in process execution.
      </p>
      <p>Conclusions. Several open research gaps are found by analyzing the
state-of-theart. For one, when the major research focus is on the discovery of organizational
models, there remain key issues in the extant discovery methods: (1) They lack in
consideration for the multiple dimensions of business processes, and (2) most of
the discovered models neglect the description of how discovered resource groups
are involved in executing processes, and (3) an appropriate evaluation method
that compares a discovered model against the input event log is still missing.
On the other hand, the topics of conformance checking and enhancement in
organizational model mining remain largely under-explored.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Research Problem</title>
      <p>Research gaps revealed in the literature analysis lead to several interesting
research questions (RQ) being studied in this research.</p>
      <p>RQ1. How to model and discover resource groupings based on event logs?
The starting point is to discover organizational models that characterize the
actual resource groupings using event logs. A comprehensive discovery approach is
needed, which should consider the multiple dimensions of business processes and
should construct models that properly characterize resource groups in process
execution. Furthermore, the discovery results need to be evaluated appropriately
against the input event logs.</p>
      <p>RQ2. What are the possible aspects and criteria for analyzing resource
groupings in process execution?
RQ3. How to analyze resource groupings based on the established aspects and
criteria?
Analyzing resource groupings based on event logs is the prerequisite for
improving them. The lack of state-of-the-art research on the conformance checking and
enhancement issues in organizational model mining motivates the study of these
questions. To address RQ2 and RQ3, it requires formalizing a set of dimensions
and the corresponding methods or measures for assessing organizational models.
Potential ideas include (1) their conformance to the reality as re ected by event
logs, and (2) their appropriateness with regard to organizational design
principles in management science. It is also worth \diagnosing" resource groupings
using event logs, for example, to detect performance issues related to groups and
member resources, and how these issues impact the entire process.
RQ4. How to enhance resource groupings in business processes in order to
empower human resources and improve business process performance?</p>
      <p>The nal research question concerns how to utilize the outcomes from
discovering and analyzing resource groupings to improve existing groupings and thus
their relevant process performance. To address this question, methods need to be
developed, which can produce alternative models that resolve issues uncovered
from analyses or inform redesigns of groupings to ful ll improvement targets. For
example, a new organizational model can be derived based on revising the \as-is"
one, which reallocates the groupings of employees to achieve better designation
of responsibilities according to their frequent behavior and performance.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Methodology and Design</title>
      <p>Design Science Research (DSR) methodology is applied when conducting this
research. Guided by the iterative process of DSR, a research design was created
which outlines the tasks to be addressed as follows.
1. Identifying Problems : This has been addressed by conducting a literature
review, with a focus on the topic of organizational model mining as well as
other relevant work of process mining from the organizational perspective.
Topics in other related elds were also examined, including human resource
analytics in management, data mining and data visualization techniques in
computer science.
2. Designing Methods : Methods and software tools will be designed and
developed. Knowledge will be drawn from existing research or software related to
process mining and human resource analytics for designing. The development
of software tools will be achieved following software engineering principles
and practices, and be carried out in alignment with some of the open-source
process mining software o erings.
3. Demonstration and Evaluation: Experimentation is used for testing the
designed and developed methods and tools, which is done by (1) selecting and
preparing event log datasets for experiments, and then (2) designing and
conducting experiments using selected event log datasets to test the
proposals. Conclusions from the experiments will be used to re ne the design
and development of methods and tools. Furthermore, case studies are also
planned for evaluating the applicability of the developed methods and tools
in real organizations.
4. Communicating Research: The research design and outcomes will be
communicated to the research community in venues such as doctoral consortiums,
conferences, and journal publications. Also, this research will be
communicated with HR and workforce planning practitioners and analysts in real
organizations, which will be carried out as part of the planned case studies.
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Current Progress</title>
      <p>This section summarizes the current stage of the reported research.
Novel De nition of Organizational Models. In view of the current issues of
organizational models discovered from event logs, a novel model de nition is rst
proposed. Compared to the literature, this novel de nition speci es not only the
clustering of individual resources into groups, but also the representation of
resource groups' behavior in process execution. This is achieved by introducing the
concept of execution contexts. Execution contexts are based on viewing resource
actions in process execution through the lens of certain meaningful classi
cations of activities, cases, and times, and therefore turning event logs into data
samples of resource groups and their behavior. Using execution contexts enables
case
types
time
types
(2)</p>
      <p>(1)
activity types
execution contexts
resource groups
resources
an organizational model to capture various ways of how employees are grouped,
such as shift workers or employee teams dedicated to speci c customers. Fig. 1
shows an illustration of the novel organizational models. The next step of
research considers two tasks. For one, more process dimensions will be included
in execution contexts given event log datasets with additional information, e.g.,
locations of human resources. For another, it is also worth exploring a
semiautomatic approach to deriving execution contexts from event logs. Currently,
they are derived by manually designating the classi cations of activities, cases,
and times based on prior knowledge of event logs.</p>
      <p>Conceptual Framework. Built upon the novel model de nition, a conceptual
framework has been established to outline the critical research components to
address the void of literature on organizational model mining. Fig. 2 shows the
framework and the remainder of this section explains each of these components.</p>
      <p>Model
Discovery
Model
Encoding</p>
      <p>event logs
construct
organizational</p>
      <p>models
domain knowledge</p>
      <p>Global
Conformance</p>
      <p>Checking
Local
Analysis</p>
      <p>Model
Improvement
evaluate
highlight/detect
inform
quality/
alignment
explain</p>
      <p>group
performance
enhanced
models
Fig. 2. A conceptual framework for organizational model mining in this research
Organizational Model Discovery. Organizational models can be constructed from
either (1) applying a model discovery approach using event logs or (2) applying a
model encoding approach using domain knowledge of managers or other o cial
documentation about organizational structures. The former captures the actual
groupings of resources in process execution, while the latter captures the o cial
or de jure groupings of resources. Up to date, an initial approach has been
developed to discovering models from event logs. Future work considers improving
this model discovery approach and developing a model encoding approach.
Global Conformance Checking Measures. Global conformance checking is to
evaluate the quality of discovered models against event logs or the alignment between
o cial models and the reality. Motivated by the research on process model
discovery, the measures of tness and precision have been proposed for calculating
how well an organizational model represents the actual groupings of resources
and their behavior in the reality. The next step of research concerns validating
these proposed measures.</p>
      <p>Local Analysis Measures. Unlike global conformance checking, local analysis is
conducted on the level of resource groups or group members instead of the entire
organizational model. This part of the research aims at providing methods for
highlighting performance insights or diagnose potential issues related to resource
groupings. Moreover, local analysis can facilitate explaining the results of global
conformance checking performed on organizational models. Currently, an initial
set of analysis measures have been established by drawing insights from selected
management literature on performance measures of employee teams and
departments. A corresponding data visualization tool has been developed to assist in
performing local analysis. Based on these, a systematic literature review will be
conducted to extend the set of measures for more comprehensive local analyses.
Tool Development. An open source software tool was designed following the
conceptual framework to demonstrate the ideas proposed in this research, assist in
experimentation, and help communicate the outcomes to the research
community as well as to practitioners in real organizations. The tool1 is under active
development alongside the progress of this research.
6</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Contributions</title>
      <p>The contributions of this PhD research are expected to be two-fold. From a
research point of view, this research will contribute to the eld process mining by
extending the research on mining organizational models. It will also contribute
to the studies on human resource analytics by introducing event log data as an
accessible data source for analyzing employee groups, and providing the
framework and methods for doing so. As such, this research is expected to promote the
value of process mining techniques in the eld of human resource management.
1 Software tool being developed in this project: https://royjy.me/to/orgminer</p>
      <p>From a pragmatic point of view, the research outcomes can empower
managerial teams in organizations by o ering them a repeatable and systematic
means to gain actionable insights on employee groupings from event log data,
and therefore support them in making more guided decisions. Thus, employees
will also bene t from the results of improved decision-making by, e.g., engaging
in more suitable groups and having more tailored assignments of work.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This research is supervised by Dr. Chun Ouyang, Prof. Arthur ter Hofstede and
Prof. Wil van der Aalst, and supported by an Australian Government Research
Training Program (RTP) Scholarship.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Appice</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Towards mining the organizational structure of a dynamic event scenario</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Intell. Inf. Syst</source>
          .
          <volume>50</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <volume>165</volume>
          {
          <fpage>193</fpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Burattin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sperduti</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Veluscek</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Business models enhancement through discovery of roles</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM)</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>103</volume>
          {
          <issue>110</issue>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Daft</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Murphy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Willmott</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.:
          <article-title>Organization theory and design. Cengage learning EMEA (</article-title>
          <year>2010</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davenport</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Harris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shapiro</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Competing on talent analytics</article-title>
          .
          <source>Harvard business review</source>
          <volume>88</volume>
          (
          <issue>10</issue>
          ),
          <volume>52</volume>
          {
          <fpage>58</fpage>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hanachi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gaaloul</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mondi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R.:
          <article-title>Performative-Based Mining of Work ow Organizational Structures</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on E-Commerce and Web Technologies</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>63</volume>
          {
          <fpage>75</fpage>
          . Springer (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Organizational modeling from event logs</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing (GCC)</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>670</volume>
          {
          <issue>675</issue>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sung</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Song</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Choi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A business process simulation framework incorporating the e ects of organizational structure</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Industrial Engineering</source>
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <volume>454</volume>
          {
          <fpage>466</fpage>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8. de Leoni, M.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>van der Aalst</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W.M.P.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>van Dongen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Data-</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Resource-Aware Conformance</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Checking of Business Processes</article-title>
          . In: Abramowicz,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Kriksciuniene</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Sakalauskas</surname>
          </string-name>
          , V. (eds.)
          <source>Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          ). pp.
          <volume>48</volume>
          {
          <fpage>59</fpage>
          . Springer (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Boudreau</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.W.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>An evidence-based review of HR Analytics</article-title>
          .
          <source>The International Journal of Human Resource Management</source>
          <volume>28</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <volume>3</volume>
          {
          <fpage>26</fpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10. Schonig,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Cabanillas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Jablonski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Mendling</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.:</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A framework for e ciently mining the organisational perspective of business processes</article-title>
          .
          <source>Decis. Support Syst</source>
          .
          <volume>89</volume>
          ,
          <issue>87</issue>
          {
          <fpage>97</fpage>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Song</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>van der Aalst</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.M.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Towards comprehensive support for organizational mining</article-title>
          .
          <source>Decis. Support Syst</source>
          .
          <volume>46</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <volume>300</volume>
          {
          <fpage>317</fpage>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>van der Aalst</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.M.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <source>Process Mining: Data Science in Action (2nd Ed.)</source>
          . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ouyang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , C.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>van der Aalst</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.M.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ter Hofstede</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.H.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>OrgMining 2.0: A novel framework for organizational model mining from event logs (</article-title>
          <year>2020</year>
          ), https://arxiv.org/abs/
          <year>2011</year>
          .12445
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>