<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Word-Level Verification by Equality Abstraction of Data State</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Karem A. Sakallah</string-name>
          <email>karem@umich.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Universityy of Michigan</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>2260 Hayward Ave. Ann Arbor, MI, 48109</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2021</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>18</fpage>
      <lpage>19</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>AVR is, primarily, an IC3/PDR-style model checker for safety properties of word-level hardware. It scales to large designs by automatically abstracting the state space of word-level variables such that only equality and dis-equality among the variables are preserved regardless of their exact bit-precise assignments. The abstraction is parameterized by a user-specified bit width threshold  which can range from 1 to the largest bit width in the design. Reachability queries employ EUF logic for word-level variables whose width is larger than  and BV logic for variables whose width is less than or equal to  . This provides for a range of data abstractions that enable AVR to successfully handle a diverse set of benchmarks. AVR produces compact word-level inductive invariants for safe designs or counterexamples for unsafe designs. AVR was the overall winner of the 2020 Hardware Model Checking Competition. In this talk I will analyze AVR's performance on the 2020 HWMCC benchmarks under a variety of bit width thresholds. I will also compare its IC3/PDR mode with an option for  -induction and discuss the IhStpN:/c1e6u1r3-w-0s.o7r3g CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>advantages and limitations of these approaches for diferent benchmark families.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>CEUR</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Workshop</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Proceedings</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>