<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>ICT Competence of a Teacher in the Context of Digital Transformation of Education*</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>FGAOU VO Belgorod State National Research University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Belgorod</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>North-Caucasus Federal University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Stavropol</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>University of Ljubljana</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ljubljana</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="SI">Slovenia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>0000</fpage>
      <lpage>0001</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The transition to digital education is an inevitable trend in modern education. The digital transformation of education is primarily aimed at achieving the required educational results, increasing the availability and quality of education at all its levels. The features of digital education are management of educational results; designing individual educational trajectories; an abundance of educational materials; correct use of new technologies: “mobile learning, virtual and augmented reality; learning in cooperation, involvement in learning based on gamification and storytelling (educational games), etc.”. The teacher needs to understand the possibilities of ICT both for expanding and improving the educational process and for using digital technologies to enhance and introduce innovations in the field of education. In the context of distance learning, in which the whole world found itself as a result of the announced pandemic, it was the teacher's mastering of the components of ICT competence to solve emerging issues in the professional activity that became a necessary condition for his professional growth, ensuring a high-quality learning process and promoting the skills of the 21st century. Requirements for the teacher's ICT competence include the presence of an information culture; IT readiness; digital literacy. The article presents the results of a study on mastering the ICT competence of the teaching staff of the Belgorod State National Research University in dynamics, which are based on the requirements for the ICT competence of the teacher and include 3 levels of digital literacy: the basic level, the level of proficiency in working in a digital educational environment and level of proficiency in digital educational technologies</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Higher education</kwd>
        <kwd>Digital Pedagogy</kwd>
        <kwd>Digital Transformation of Education</kwd>
        <kwd>ICT Competence of a Teacher</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Modernity is characterized by dynamic development and active use of information
technology. Pedagogy as a science is also dynamically developing by the requirements
of society. Therefore, the scientific and pedagogical literature is replenished with a new
conceptual apparatus: “digital learning; digital pedagogy; online pedagogy; hybrid
pedagogy; critical digital pedagogy; digital humanities "(digital humanities), etc." [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        It is becoming common to use the terms “digital educator”; Digital student;
“Professor-online”, etc. There is a request for new teaching professions: the curator of the
online platform (“adapts the requirements of specific disciplines to the online
environment”); "Interdisciplinary tutor" ("supervises the student's trajectory"); "Technician of
educational gaming environments" (gamifier) (develops, "tests and implements
educational online games in augmented and virtual reality") [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The dynamic development
of education based on the introduction of new digital technologies makes it possible to
significantly improve traditionally and form qualitatively new educational results and
to develop the creative potential of each student. Numerous studies have shown that the
characteristics of students change in the educational process, indicating the need to
move to new pedagogical approaches. To improve students' understanding and reduce
their misconceptions, researchers propose the use of learning and teaching approaches
based on constructivist learning theory [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Back in 2015, the Edutainment project published the “Manifesto on the Digital
Education Environment” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. The main provisions of the document determine the broad
possibilities of the digital educational environment: “the presence of interdisciplinary
connections; priority of student-centered learning; the possibility of self-control of
progress in mastering the discipline; adaptability and much greater independence of the
student in the educational process” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. Through the use of information technology,
information support is provided for the activities of educational organizations [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
        ].
Thus, in the scientific and pedagogical literature, digital pedagogy is understood as "the
use of electronic elements in the educational process to enhance and change the
educational experience" [15, с. 96].
      </p>
      <p>At the same time, some trends have emerged in modern Russian education, thanks
to which the most noticeable changes in the educational process are taking place:
1) "accessibility of knowledge" thanks to mobile, cloud-based learning, online
courses that provide an opportunity to study regardless of the location of the students;
2) personalization of education - building an individual educational trajectory for
each student as a unique program in which the student's progress in a specific subject
is analyzed, what are his weaknesses and what educational materials are better
perceived;</p>
      <p>3) a paradigm shifts in the relationship between teacher and students, which led to
the popularization of such forms of education as collaborative learning (joint activity),
interdisciplinary knowledge, collective projects, mutual learning, etc.;
4) Smart Learning - the application of new teaching methods - Blended Learning
and Flipped Classroom, merging online distribution of software and content in the form
of multimedia.</p>
      <p>5) social learning - the use of social networks and various social services for the
exchange of knowledge, experience, discussion of joint activities;</p>
      <p>6) involvement in learning based on gamification, virtual and augmented reality - as
new ways of transmitting and perceiving information, which make learning intriguing,
exciting, and easier.</p>
      <p>All these changes in the educational process, which are taking place thanks to the
new generation of ICT, require an ever wider and more complex set of professional
competencies of a teacher than before. The teacher is faced with rapidly changing
requirements, he has the opportunity to realize professional competence, including ICT
competence, using not only technical skills in working with ICT but skills in working
in a digital educational environment, possession of digital educational technologies that
contribute to improving the quality of the educational process and introduction of
innovations in the field of education.</p>
      <p>
        In this regard, to harness the educational potential of ICTs to expand and improve
education, UNESCO is pursuing a policy to develop global ICT guidelines. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ] The
developed ICT Competency Framework for Teachers (ICT-CFT) aims to integrate new
digital technologies into national education to achieve educational goals by 2030.
ICTCFT represents the complete set of skills that educators need to integrate ICT into their
professional work.
      </p>
      <p>
        In European countries, the European structure of digital competence of teachers
(DigCompEdu) is widely used, the basis of which is a systematic approach to support
the development of digital competencies of teachers at all levels of education [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
        ].
DigCompEdu offers a digital competency assessment system that can assist educators
in self-assessment, setting learning goals, identifying learning opportunities and further
professional development for teachers.
      </p>
      <p>
        In the Russian professional standard of a teacher, ICT competence is interpreted as
“the qualified use of ICT tools that are widespread in a specific field of activity in
solving professional problems where needed and when needed” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ]. Hence, one of the
most important components of the professional ICT competence of a teacher is the
competent use of ICT tools in solving professional and pedagogical problems for
effective pedagogical support of the educational process, the appropriate choice of ICT to
support specific teaching and learning methods; implementation of pedagogical
interaction of subjects of the educational process.
2
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>The Purpose</title>
      <p>This study analyzes the dynamics of the ICT competence of the teachers of the National
Research University "BelSU" before and after the pandemic. At the same time, in
determining the ICT competence of a university teacher, the authors proceeded from the
fact that the ICT competence of a teacher characterizes the degree of his readiness to
use modern information technologies in professional and pedagogical activities and
includes 3 levels of digital literacy: the basic level, the level of proficiency in a digital
educational environment and the level of proficiency in educational technologies based
on ICT.</p>
      <p>The use of the wide possibilities of ICT, methods of transferring and perceiving
information allows teachers to more effectively use pedagogical technologies in the
educational process, to look for new approaches aimed at increasing the level of sustainable
cognitive motivation of students. In this study, the authors set another task: to help
teachers choose tools and services to support specific teaching and learning methods,
using the innovative nature of digital technologies. In our opinion, this will increase the
level of ICT competence.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Presentation of the Main Material</title>
      <p>
        The work of foreign and domestic researchers is devoted to the problems of the
formation and development of the teacher's ICT competencies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11 ref12 ref13 ref14 ref21 ref23 ref27 ref3 ref4 ref7 ref9">3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
14, 21, 23, 27</xref>
        ]. Requirements for a teacher's ICT competence are spelled out in the
UNESCO recommendations (ICT Competency Framework for Teachers) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ], in the
European system of digital competencies (DigCompEdu) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
        ], in the teacher's
professional standard (Concept and content) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ], the transition to which in Russia was carried
out in 2019. To achieve the goal of the study, the following research methods were
used: theoretical analysis of scientific literature [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15 ref17 ref19 ref2 ref20 ref22 ref26 ref3 ref8">2, 3, 8, 15, 17, 19, 20, 22, 26</xref>
        ];
interpretive (comprehensive and systematic study of the object of research; generalization
of practical experience, etc.), empirical (diagnostics of the teaching staff of NRU
"BelGU": a questionnaire and test for teachers to determine the level of their digital
competence (Klepikova A.G., Belenko V.B.).
      </p>
      <p>Digital pedagogy expands, modernizes the means, form, and structure of traditional
pedagogy. This enables educators to freely design/design training sessions; use
electronic libraries of educational literature, educational services; and for students to
independently design an individual educational trajectory. There is a systematic update of
the components of the educational process in the digital educational environment
(DSP), for example: “required educational results; content of education; organizational
forms and methods” [26, p. 102]; evaluation of the results of educational work. This
allows you to build an educational process that meets the conditions for successful
learning; to form the competencies necessary for life in the information society. Based
on the foregoing, we can say with confidence that digital pedagogy transforms the
education system to the conditions of an emerging digital civilization, expands the
capabilities of every person, regardless of their age qualification, the specifics of their
profession, place of residence, to master the open and fair accessibility of information and
gender equality in the provision of education supported technology.</p>
      <p>The innovative, creative nature of digital technologies makes it possible to solve
complex, previously unsolvable tasks (for example, to formulate the competencies of
the 21st century in students by evidence, to develop their ability to be independent in
various types of activities, to implement the principle of “education throughout life”).
The rapid dissemination and renewal of these technologies creates truly unlimited
opportunities for teachers and students to access digital tools, materials, and services, to a
library of network materials, and allows them to control their own information space.</p>
      <p>
        By the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian
Federation for 2017-2030. qualitative changes in the content of the teacher's ICT
competence are required [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>
        ], since the teacher of the modern knowledge society is called
upon to instill in students the skills of competent use of digital technologies to obtain
additional knowledge from the global Internet, to be able to highlight the main thing
from a huge amount of information, to find the necessary material when solving
educational -cognitive and research tasks.
      </p>
      <p>
        Digital pedagogy develops and offers for use in the educational process a huge
variety of pedagogical ICT tools: “open educational resources (OER); massive open online
courses (MOOCs); learning platforms (Learning Management System / LMS);
electronic textbooks (smartbook/e-book); electronic libraries (e-library); mobile learning;
global media; cloud educational systems and Internet services (Web 3.0); electronic
portfolios and personal electronic accounts; digital video communications” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ]. The
main thing for a teacher is to understand how, using ICT tools as a tool, they can
generate new knowledge, apply new educational technologies, share new interesting ideas
in the professional community.
      </p>
      <p>It is very comfortable for the modern generation of students to communicate on the
Internet, and the transmission of educational information by the teacher in the
traditional form is perceived by them as uninteresting. Moreover, the Internet currently has
a large number of services for the preparation and organization of the educational
process by teachers. It:</p>
      <p>1. Electronic learning systems (LMS): allow you to remotely give and check
assignments (the most popular LMS: Google Classroom, Canvas, Moodle, etc.).
2. Video services (YouTube, SchoolTube, etc.).</p>
      <p>3. Websites and platforms with open educational resources, with which you can
create interactive lessons, use interesting templates for teaching materials and be inspired
by the ideas of other teachers (Yandex &amp; Textbook, OER Commons, TEDEd, SHARE
MY LESSON, etc.).</p>
      <p>4. Social media (VKontakte, Facebook) allow not only to communicate with students
and parents in a less formal atmosphere but also are an effective management toolkit.
So, for example, a teacher can create a group for each class: place tasks in it at home,
organize "voting" on different occasions (for example, choose a date for an event), as
well as work, conduct dialogues with parents (for example, microblogging).</p>
      <p>5. Online services in a playful way - many tasks in various academic subjects on
websites and online platforms (Learnis, Kahoot, LeaningApps, Wizer, Crossword
Factory, Khan Academy, etc.).</p>
      <p>6. Documents and presentations (cloud storage - YandexDisk, GoogleDisk,
Dropbox, services - Genially, Prezi, Nearpod, Canvas, etc.), which make it possible to write
comments, edit various documentation, etc.</p>
      <p>7. Tools for digital creativity (Biteable, Powtoon, Utellstory, Learn, etc.) allow you
to give students an exciting task, to see the creative result of the activity. A distinctive
feature and at the same time the specificity of the above means is that they are not only
"discovered" by students and their teachers, but, most importantly, they contribute to
interactive interaction, during which both teachers and students are literally "critically
investigated" and new knowledge is created.</p>
      <p>Educators with ICT competencies can freely use all this variety of pedagogical tools,
making an informed choice of digital tools and services to support specific teaching and
learning methods, for example: learning in collaboration; project activity; virtual and
augmented reality; mobile learning; gamification and storytelling; BYOD technologies,
etc.</p>
      <p>
        To provide teachers with the necessary skills and competencies to support learning
and improve learning outcomes and digital skills development using ICTs, it is
necessary to understand what constituents of ICT competence exist. According to the
UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers, the components of ICT
competencies include 6 main aspects of the teacher's work, aimed at understanding the role of
ICT in education, curriculum assessment, pedagogical practices based on ICT, the use
of digital skills, organization and management of the educational process, professional
-personal development [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ]. According to ICT-CFT, the main aspects of a teacher's
work are related to 3 levels of ICT use in educational practice: 1) acquisition of
knowledge; 2) deepening of knowledge; 3) creation of new knowledge. These three
levels correspond to the stages of professional development of a teacher, starting from
the basic level of ICT proficiency (knowledge of the use of technologies and basic
competencies in the field of ICT), then the level of proficiency in working in a digital
educational environment (creating a learning environment focused on students,
integrating ICT into the educational environment) and, finally, the level of proficiency in
educational technologies based on ICT (the ability to model a learning environment
based on new digital technologies, which encourages students to create new knowledge
necessary for a more harmonious, full-fledged and prosperous society) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>It should be noted that the use of ICT in pedagogical practice depends on the state
of modern information technologies and those trends that have developed in the global
educational space. Therefore, one of the most important components of the professional
ICT competence of a teacher/teacher is the degree of his readiness to use modern
information technologies in professional and pedagogical activities and the management of
educational results in a digital educational environment. And, as a consequence,
possession of educational IR technologies is a necessary condition for the formation of
information and communication competencies in the process of formal and informal
professional development, self-training, and self-improvement of a teacher.</p>
      <p>
        The content of the professional standard of a teacher in the Russian Federation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ].
terms of his ICT competencies include "labor actions" and the necessary skills for the
use of information and communication technologies in professional activities, which
are referred to the technological level of requirements and methodological. Taken
together, these requirements make it possible to implement the interaction of teachers and
students in terms of mastering new types of educational resources, their presentation
formats, pedagogical practices, methods, and technologies, and also orient the teacher
to the use of distance learning resources in educational activities, the professional use
of elements of the information educational environment.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>To determine the ICT competence of teachers, the authors conducted a study of the
teaching staff of the Belgorod State National Research University based on a tiered
approach: the basic level of digital literacy, the level of proficiency in working in a
digital educational environment, and the level of proficiency in educational
technologies based on ICT. The dynamics of ICT competence have been monitored since 2020,
when the threat of coronavirus infection was announced to the whole world and all
educational institutions were transferred to a distance learning format by March 2021.
451 people from among the teaching staff of NRU "BelSU" took part in the survey,
including professors (3.7%), associate professors (63.2%), senior teachers (13.8%),
assistants (9.4%), directors/deans/heads of departments (9.5%). Age qualification of
respondents: from 22 years old to 65 years old and older (Fig. 1).
At the beginning of the study, a survey of university teachers was conducted to
determine the level of ICT competence (initial, basic, user, and confident user) in three areas:
digital literacy, possession of skills in working in a digital educational environment,
knowledge of educational technologies using ICT. The initial level involved the ability
to turn on and off the computer, understanding the purpose of the main input devices,
information output, knowledge of the basic functions of the operating system
(renaming, copying, and moving files, working in a text editor, creating and saving
documents), the skill of working with text editors, files, folders, e-mail. The basic level
required knowledge of Word and Excel editors, creating PowerPoint presentations,
working with e-mail, various Internet browsers (searching and downloading the necessary
information), the ability to work with graphic editors, using removable media - disks
and flash drives, knowledge of the purpose of archivers and the possibility of their use.</p>
      <p>User - knowledge of the purpose and application of various "hot'' key combinations,
the use of functional buttons on the keyboard, good command of basic MS Office
programs (Access, Excel, PowerPoint, Word), the ability to work with all browser settings,
finding the necessary information on the Internet via search engines, search for a lost
file document or folder in the PC operating system, the use of social networks, including
for educational purposes, the ability to independently install simple programs on a PC.
Confident - full knowledge of the PC functionality, the ability to use it, knowledge of
text recognition systems, automatic text translation, and image processing; confident
knowledge of the MS Office package, specialized programs in a specific professional
area; the ability to solve tasks with the help of software, find non-standard solutions,
deliver any application through the program installer; the ability to work with different
educational online platforms, conduct classes using online courses, use online services,
cloud storages, interact with students and colleagues through web technologies.</p>
      <p>The data obtained on the basis of teachers' self-assessment at the beginning of the
study showed that 2.6% of respondents were at the initial level of digital literacy, 23.1%
at the basic level, 40.3% rated themselves at the user level of proficiency, and 34.0% at
the level of a confident user. At the level of proficiency in working in the digital
educational environment of the National Research University "BelSU", respectively: 4.3%
at the initial level, basic - 26.5%, user - 38.7%, the level of confident user - 30.5%.
Possession of educational technologies using ICT at the initial level was assessed by
4.5% of the respondents, at the basic level by 30.4%, at the user level by 38.5% among
the respondents and 26.6% assessed themselves at the level of confident users (Fig. 2).</p>
      <p>At the end of the study (March 2021), the distribution of respondents by levels of digital
literacy has changed significantly, the self-esteem of teachers has increased, as
evidenced by the survey data. The initial level of digital literacy decreased to 1.4%; the
difference at the basic level turned out to be significant, the value of which decreased
from 23.1% to 7.5%; the level of confident users increased from 34% to 50.8% (Fig.
3). Digital Learning Skills also rose significantly at the Confident User level, from
38.7% to 56.4%, while Basic, Beginner, and User were down 2.9%, 18.6%, and 4.4%,
respectively. There were also changes in teachers' proficiency in digital educational
technologies - they increased at the user level by almost 3%, at the confident user level
by 20%, and decreased at the basic and initial levels by 2.8% and 20.2%, respectively.</p>
      <p>These changes in teachers' self-esteem occurred due to the active “forced” use of
information and communication technologies in the educational process of the
university, without which education became impossible during the period of a mass pandemic
and isolation of teachers and students in educational organizations.</p>
      <p>By organizing the survey, the task was to find out the opinion of the respondents about
their attitude to work in the digital educational environment of the NRU "BelSU", in
which they closely interacted with the students during the period of distance learning.
In their answers, teachers noted the following: before the pandemic, 16.2% did not use
the educational online environment (they communicated with students in person);
55.3% used the information and educational environment to test students; 25.6% of the
respondents actively used the resources of the information and educational system of
the university in the educational process in all forms of education, 20.9% only for
interaction with students enrolled in correspondence courses, 0.2% used another similar
e-learning system.</p>
      <p>Currently, the attitude of teachers to the information and educational environment
has changed, since, for 92.8% of the respondents, the Pegasus e-learning system (SEA)
has become the main educational environment for interaction with students, of which:
37.6% wished to modernize their online courses, add more interactive elements; 28.8%
learned the purpose and functionality of various elements of the Pegasus system and
actively use them in the educational process; 59.3% conduct lectures and seminars
online, using video conferencing tools, the BigBlueButton element or a ZOOM meeting
in the Pegasus training course; 41% actively use the point-rating system in SEA
Pegasus, and only 5.8% did not change anything with working in a digital environment. This
indicates that during the pandemic, almost all teachers and students switched to distance
learning and interacted in a digital educational environment (SEA "Pegas" NRU
"BelSU"). In it, they were able to "pump" their flexible skills. This is confirmed by the
positive dynamics of the level of proficiency of teachers in the skills of working in a
digital educational environment (the advanced level increased by almost 26%).</p>
      <p>For an objective assessment of the level of proficiency in ICT competencies of the
teachers of NRU "BelSU", testing was carried out, the purpose of which is to identify
the level of proficiency of teachers in ICT, online services, and digital educational
technologies. The test results are shown in Fig. 4. The test included 3 types of tasks for
knowledge, skill, and the use of IR technologies in professional and pedagogical
activities.</p>
      <p>Based on the results of the teachers' testing, a statistical analysis of the main test
indicators was carried out. The standard deviation of scores for the test (Standard deviation)
is 13.91, which characterizes the suitability of the test for differentiation by the level of
assimilation of the material. The score distribution skewness shows negative skewness
with a normal distribution of individual scores from a representative sample (-0.8408),
i.e. approximately 84% of the average scores are in the center of the distribution, and a
negative value indicates the possible difficulty of the test given to the instructors. At
the same time, the coefficient of discrimination (Discrimination index) for 3 types of
tasks for knowledge, skill, and the use of IR technologies in professional and
pedagogical activity varies within 30%, which also indicates that the tasks have sufficient
differentiating ability. In the study, we conducted a correlation analysis to determine the
level of validity of test items using the Pearson formula. The obtained coefficient of
validity is 0.8746, which allows us to conclude that the test can be applied in practice
to determine the level of ICT competencies of teachers.</p>
      <p>
        The development of IT education is aimed at eliminating the existing shortage of
professional IT staff, due to both the specifics of the system for training IT professionals
in the country and the consequences of the accumulated “demographic hole”. Bridging
the imbalance between the demand for IT staff and their supply is a top priority for
higher technical education [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28 ref29 ref30">28-30</xref>
        ].
5
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Thus, the results of the study revealed the following.</p>
      <p>1. The study of ICT competence showed that the basic and initial level of ICT
competence among teachers decreased in three directions: digital literacy, possession of
skills in working in a digital educational environment, possession of educational
technologies using ICT, at the same time, the level of user and confident user in all three
areas.</p>
      <p>2. During the study period, there were noticeable changes not only in the
self-assessment of teachers but also in the real level of ICT competencies: 72.95% of respondents
showed results at the level of a confident user, 18.4% at the user level, 2.2 at the initial
level and 0.67% baseline. At the same time, the conducted statistical analysis made it
possible to conclude that the test is suitable for differentiation by the level of mastering
the test material and the possibility of applying it in practice to determine the level of
teachers' ICT competencies.</p>
      <p>3. Objective data from a survey of teachers showed that 45.3% of respondents
changed their attitude to distance learning for the better, as they gained an
understanding of the process of distance interaction with students, acquired skills in using distance
learning technologies, and increased their ICT competencies. These changes have
occurred due to the active use of information and communication technologies in the
educational process of the university, without which distance learning became impossible.
37.4% did not change their attitude, in 17.3% the dynamics of the attitude turned out to
be negative.</p>
      <p>The conclusions made as a result of the study are aimed at improving the digital
competence of university teachers and intensifying the exchange of views with
representatives of the pedagogical community in the field of ICT education.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <article-title>Atlas of new professions / Skolkovo Agency for Strategic Initiatives (</article-title>
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>-</article-title>
          M., (
          <year>2014</year>
          ). URL: https://files.asi.ru/iblock/ce8/ce82467fa9a2b9d99d1314475b297c3e/Atlas.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gromkova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gromkov</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M.T.:
          <article-title>Andragogicheskaya model of a holistic educational process: monograph /</article-title>
          . - Moscow: UNITI: Law and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Law</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2006</year>
          .
          <volume>278</volume>
          p. (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Eliseev</surname>
          </string-name>
          , N.:
          <article-title>Digital Educational Products</article-title>
          and
          <article-title>Services for Modern Education</article-title>
          . M.: Education [Electronic resource] URL: http://prosv.ru / https://docplayer.ru/78934076-
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cifrovye-</surname>
          </string-name>
          obrazovatelnye
          <article-title>-produkty-i-servisy-dlya-sovremennogo-obrazovaniya</article-title>
          .html
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ignatiev</surname>
            <given-names>V.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ivanova</surname>
            <given-names>A.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ivanova M.D.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>ICT competence of a teacher as the basis of digital literacy of students. Modern problems of science and education</article-title>
          .
          <source>2020</source>
          . No.
          <volume>2</volume>
          .; URL: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=
          <volume>29709</volume>
          (date of access:
          <volume>07</volume>
          /31/
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>5. ICT competence within the professional standard of a teacher / Russian textbook [Electronic resource] URL: https://rosuchebnik.ru/material/ikt-kompetentnost-v-ramkakh-professionalnogo-standarta-pedagoga-article/</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>6. Manifesto on the digital educational environment - [Electronic resource]</article-title>
          . URL: http://manifesto.edutainme.ru/
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Molokova</surname>
            <given-names>A. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Modern regulatory requirements for the teacher's ICT competence and the possibility of their implementation. Scientific and pedagogical review</article-title>
          .
          <source>Pedagogical Review</source>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <volume>1</volume>
          (
          <issue>11</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ignatova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.Yu.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dokuchaev</surname>
            <given-names>S.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Education in the Digital Age: Monograph. Nizhny Tagil: NTI (branch</article-title>
          ) UrFU,
          <year>2017</year>
          .128 p. (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sulaiman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ismail</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Teacher Competence and 21st Century Skills in Transformation Schools 2025 (TS25)</article-title>
          <source>Universal Journal of Educational Research</source>
          , Vol.
          <volume>8</volume>
          , No.
          <issue>8</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>3536</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3544</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          . DOI:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .13189/ujer.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>080829</volume>
          . (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jedrinović</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ferk Savec</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rugelj</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.:
          <article-title>Innovative and Flexible Approaches to Teaching and Learning with ICT</article-title>
          . In: Väljataga,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Laanpere</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M. (eds.). Digital turn in schools - research, policy,
          <source>practice: proceedings of ICEM 2018 Conference</source>
          . Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, cop.
          <year>2019</year>
          . РР.
          <volume>171</volume>
          -
          <fpage>186</fpage>
          , (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jiménez -Hernández</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>González-Calatayud</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Torres-Soto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Martínez</surname>
            <given-names>Mayoral</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Morales</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.:</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Digital Competence of Future Secondary School Teachers: Differences According to Gender, Age, and Branch of Knowledge</article-title>
          .
          <source>Sustainability</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          ,
          <volume>12</volume>
          , 9473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229473 (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Konopko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pankratova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Distance Learning is One of the Forms of</article-title>
          Organization of University E-Education.
          <source>Noosphere Research</source>
          .
          <year>2021</year>
          . No. 2. S.
          <volume>36</volume>
          -
          <fpage>43</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kormakova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Klepikova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Prokopenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Musaielian</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Quality Management Principles of Scientific and Methodological Support for Students' Activity within ELearning Environment</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings International Multidisciplinary Symposium ICT Research in Russian Federation and Europe “Integrating Research Agendas and Devising Joint Challenges” (REMS-2018)</source>
          . Roma, Italy; Stavropol, Russia,
          <year>2018</year>
          . P.
          <volume>63</volume>
          -
          <fpage>75</fpage>
          . (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luštek</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jedrinović</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rugelj</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.:
          <article-title>Supporting Teachers in Higher Education for Didactic Use of the Learning Environment Moodle</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Innovative Approaches to the Application of Digital Technologies in Education and Research (SLET-2019) Stavropol-Dombay, Russia</article-title>
          . http://ceur-ws.
          <source>org/</source>
          Vol-
          <volume>2494</volume>
          /paper_20.
          <string-name>
            <surname>pdf</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Opalko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Digital Pedagogy in the Education System</article-title>
          .
          <source>Successes of Modern Science</source>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          . T.
          <volume>2</volume>
          . No. 12. РР.
          <volume>95</volume>
          -
          <fpage>97</fpage>
          . (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Panyukova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Digital Tools</article-title>
          and
          <article-title>Services in the Work of a Teacher. Study Guide. M: Publishing house "Pro-Press"</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          . 33 p. (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Petrishchev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Digital Pedagogy as a Factor in Improving the Quality of Educational Services in the Russian Federation</article-title>
          . World of Science, Culture, Education.
          <year>2019</year>
          . No.
          <volume>6</volume>
          (
          <issue>79</issue>
          ). P.
          <volume>339</volume>
          -
          <fpage>341</fpage>
          . (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <article-title>Professional standard of a teacher (Concept and content)</article-title>
          . URL: https://kapotnya.mskobr.ru/files/professional_nyj_standart_pedagoga.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          19.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Redecker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Punie</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Yves: EUR - Scientific and Technical Research Reports, Publications Office of the European Union - 2017</source>
          , URL: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur
          <article-title>-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/european-framework-digital-competence-</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>educatorsdigcompedu</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          20.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rugelj</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.: Transition to Open and Flexible Learning in traditional National University. Transition to Open and Online Education in
          <source>European Universities: Proceedings. Heerlen: European Association of Distance Teaching Universities</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>330</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>335</lpage>
          . (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          21.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sánchez-Cruzado</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Santiago</surname>
            <given-names>Campión</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , R.;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sánchez-Compaña</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M.T.:
          <source>Teacher Digital Literacy: The Indisputable Challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability</source>
          <year>2021</year>
          ,
          <volume>13</volume>
          ,
          <year>1858</year>
          . https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041858 (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          22.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shutenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Information Technologies of Distance Learning as Tools for Increasing the Availability</article-title>
          and Usefulness of University Training.
          <source>Bulletin on Pedagogy and Psychology of Southern Siberia</source>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          . No.
          <volume>4</volume>
          . (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          23.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Starichenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          . B.E.:
          <article-title>Professional Standard and ICT Competence of the Teacher</article-title>
          .
          <source>Pedagogical Education in Russia. 2015. No. 7</source>
          . (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          24.
          <article-title>Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017 - 2030.</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          25.
          <string-name>
            <surname>UNESCO ICT</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Competency Framework for Teachers (2018) Version 3, Published in 2018 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific</article-title>
          and Cultural Organization,
          <volume>7</volume>
          , place de Fontenoy,
          <volume>75352</volume>
          Paris 07 SP, Franc - URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          26.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Uvarov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.Yu.: Digital</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Education: Towards Digital Transformation</surname>
          </string-name>
          . M.: Ed.
          <source>house SUHSE</source>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .168 p. (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          27.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Yu.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cruz</surname>
            Sánchez-Gómez,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pinto-Llorente</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Digital Competence in higher education: A case study of teachers' perception of working with technologies</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'20)</source>
          .
          <article-title>Association for Computing Machinery</article-title>
          , New York, NY, USA,
          <fpage>206</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>210</lpage>
          . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436561 (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>
          28.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Taran</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Quality Criteria for Professional Training of Personnel In IT Industry In Proceedings of 2018 17th Russian Scientific and Practical Conference on Planning and Teaching Engineering Staff for the Industrial and Economic Complex of the Region</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>PTES</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2018</year>
          17.
          <year>2018</year>
          . С.
          <volume>47</volume>
          -
          <fpage>50</fpage>
          . DOI:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/PTES.
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <volume>8604267</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>
          29.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Taran</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Use of Elements of Augmented Reality in the Educational Process in Higher Educational Institutions</article-title>
          . CEUR Workshop Proceedings. In 2019 International Conference on
          <article-title>Innovative approaches to the application of digital technologies in education and research SLET-2019</article-title>
          . http://ceur-ws.
          <source>org/</source>
          Vol-
          <volume>2494</volume>
          /paper_28.
          <string-name>
            <surname>pdf</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>
          30.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Taran</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Azarov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Konopko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Augmented Reality as a Modern Learning Tool</article-title>
          . CEUR Workshop Proceedings. In the 2020 International Conference on
          <article-title>Innovative approaches to the application of digital technologies in education and research SLET-2020</article-title>
          . PP.
          <volume>362</volume>
          -
          <fpage>369</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>