<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Systems of Artificial Intelligence in the Educational Process*</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Leningradsky Prospekt</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Moscow</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Russia aibogomolov@fa.ru</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>49 Leningradsky Prospekt, Moscow, 125993</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Sevastopol State University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>33 Universitetskya, Sevastopol, 299053</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>0000</fpage>
      <lpage>0003</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The development of national standards for artificial intelligence systems and giving them international status is necessary to maintain leadership in the field of advanced technologies. The article discusses the prospects for the use of artificial intelligence in the United States and Russia, as well as the concept of the development of national programs and the creation of national standards in this area; examples of the use of elements of artificial intelligence in information educational technologies of some countries are given; substantiates the need to develop artificial intelligence standards for use in various fields, including for the education system, as well as the basic requirements for these standards and the process of their development; shows the role and tasks of government institutions in organizing the development of artificial intelligence, taking into account their interaction with scientific organizations, commercial structures, and the international community. In creating a system of artificial intelligence standards for education, it is proposed to identify nine areas to focus on, using the main tools to advance the development and implementation of effective, reliable, and trustworthy artificial intelligence technologies. Considering the level structure of information technology standards on the example of the Open Systems Interconnection model of the International Organization for Standardization, it is proposed to combine the standards of artificial intelligence systems in the educational process into a multi-level network structure. It is proposed to form the upper level of this network structure based on the structure of the Universal Description Discovery &amp; Integration system, a tool for the location of web service descriptions. This will allow in the future to unite artificial intelligence services</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>of information educational systems of universities in different countries into a
single global information educational environment.
1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Nowadays, artificial intelligence innovations affect more and more areas and not only
technical ones. This is largely due to the development of computing facilities.
Performance capabilities of modern gadgets and smartphones today are many times above the
processing power of the giant supercomputers of the 80-90-s of the 20th century.
Modern processors allow you to create artificial neuron networks, accumulate and process
a large amount of data (Big Data), use the most complex mathematical and algorithmic
methods and approaches. Today there are tremendous opportunities not only for
theoretical research but also for the practical implementation of artificial intelligence
systems in various spheres of human activity.</p>
      <p>Artificial intelligence technology entails a huge scope of activity, a vast field of
knowledge. Since artificial intelligence is an interdisciplinary area of research, one
needs knowledge in various fields, including new ones, to use it efficiently and more
often as well as to participate in its development.</p>
      <p>Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to systems of technological and software solutions
that, according to modern experts, are similar or superior to the result of human
intellectual activity. As a result, some experimental problems are being solved - such as
based on big data -when the researchers use speech recognition systems or voice
synthesis, natural language processing, computer vision, and other technologies.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Theory</title>
      <p>
        The importance of artificial intelligence for the future of humanity is becoming more
and more evident, which is reflected in the measures taken by the governments of
leading countries to ensure their leadership in this direction. Making exactly this point, viz
the importance of AI for the future of the US economy and national security, on
February 11, 2019, the President of the United States issued Executive Order (EO 13859)
stipulating federal agencies to take various steps to ensure that the country remains at
the forefront in the development and use of artificial intelligence. At the same time,
leadership in artificial intelligence (along with "quantum information science and
strategic computing") was named the second most important R&amp;D priority after ensuring
the safety of the American people for the 2020 financial year. The American AI
Initiative is guided by principles that include (in short form) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]:
1. Moving forward to achieve technological breakthroughs.
2. Moving forward to develop appropriate technical standards.
      </p>
      <p>3. Training the employees to form the needed skills to develop and use AI
technologies.
4. Protecting American values, including civil and private liberties, and building up
public confidence in artificial intelligence technologies.</p>
      <p>5. Securing US technological advantage in artificial intelligence while developing
an international environment that supports innovation.</p>
      <p>In May 2019, the United States joined dozens of other countries in adopting the
OECD Recommendation, the first intergovernmental standard on AI, that includes five
complementary values-based principles and five recommendations to governments.
The following month, the US also joined the G20 - countries that support the G20
principles, taken from the OECD recommendation. In September 2019, the US
Chamber of Commerce released the Principles on Artificial Intelligence, which also support
the OECD recommendation and call on US businesses to comply with international
standards.</p>
      <p>Russian leaders also attach great importance to the task of developing and applying
AI. Thus, in 2019, by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 490 "On
the development of artificial intelligence in the Russian Federation", a national strategy
for the development of artificial intelligence in Russia for the next 10 years was
approved. Putin V.V., speaking on November 10, 2019, in front of scientists, developers,
and representatives of high-tech business, said that it is imperative to maintain
leadership in the field of artificial intelligence. The President noted that the so-called strong
artificial intelligence can become the foundation and breakthrough for the entire
civilization.</p>
      <p>Thousands of specialists are working on the development and application of various
artificial intelligence systems in Russia. At the AI Journey forum in 2019, the Direct
Investment Fund companies - Sberbank, MTS, Yandex, Mail.ru, and Gazprom Neft
signed an agreement to create an alliance made specifically to promote the development
of artificial intelligence in Russia.</p>
      <p>It should be noted that at present more than 30 countries of the world have adopted
national strategies for the development of artificial intelligence.</p>
      <p>The trend to promote the use of AI couldn’t but influence the education process as
well. What are the prospects for the use of AI in education, and what additional benefits
will students receive from the use of AI in the educational process? AI helps to make
the learning process more personalized, effective, and convenient for the student and
teacher. Artificial intelligence helps to tailor lessons to the learner, allows teachers to
spend less time on routine work, and focus on developing new curricula and more
effective teaching methods.</p>
      <p>The use of AI for educational purposes in the European Union is also gaining
momentum. Thus, the administration of the Flemish region of Belgium has signed a
contract with a British AI platform that uses teaching methods and solutions,
neurophysiology, and data processing to personalize the learning process in schools and
universities. Century Tech will be introduced in all 700 Flemish schools over the next five
years. The company says this is the first time the authorities have decided to implement
artificial intelligence in schools on this scale.</p>
      <p>
        The goal is to replace the standard model when teachers try to convey knowledge to
students of different levels, but often fail, with a fundamentally new one, in which
artificial intelligence helps to adapt lessons to the characteristics of each student. This
involves identifying areas of knowledge he or she is familiar or unfamiliar with, where
he or she feels confident or not, and assessing how much he or she likes certain
activities. Thus the learning process becomes personalized. A more detailed description of
how intelligent information and educational technologies are combined with AI
elements and being applied we can see in many papers like [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3 ref4 ref5 ref6">2-6</xref>
        ].
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Research Methodology</title>
      <p>
        Information about the introduction of technologies related to artificial intelligence into
the educational process comes from Australia, Belarus, China, and other countries.
AIbased cognitive tutors represent the most successful transition in terms of student
numbers to AIED work from the lab to class [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The results of laboratory research and testing of systems with AI elements in
classrooms show that at the heart of an intelligent learning environment there should be a
methodically validated model of the student, it should have its design and channels of
interaction with the student [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. Pattern recognition is used to classify situations faced
by a student, for example, when solving problems [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        AI on campus (Smart-campus) responds to any student requests that are related to
study and everyday life: how to find a lecture hall, register for a chosen course, get
assignments, find a free parking space or contact a professor. The University of Western
Australia (UWA) already has such a smart campus. It runs on Watson, a
supercomputing system built by IBM. Nevertheless, today's information technologies in the
educational process should be regarded rather than systems with elements of artificial
intelligence (EII) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Each new technology goes through a period of intense growth in reputation and
expectations, followed by a sharp drop when it inevitably falls short of expectations,
followed by slow growth as the technology develops and integrates into our lives. This
applies to the development and application of AI systems in education as well. If we
consider a diagram developed by Gartner to analyze and predict technological
innovation, then this technology is somewhere on this curve, (see Fig. 1).
For citations of references, we prefer the use of square brackets and consecutive
numbers. Citations using labels or the author/year convention are also acceptable. The
following bibliography provides a sample reference list with entries for journal articles
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], an LNCS chapter [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], a book [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], proceedings without editors [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], as well as a URL
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] (Fig. 2).
      </p>
      <p>Progress in the development and application of AI systems goes on at an accelerating
pace. Thus, according to the forecasts of the IBM Open Leader board, carried out with
the involvement of research on the dynamics of many variables, by the early 2020s AI
should enter the field of deeper self-learning, and by the early 2030s it should be able
to help, collaborate, train and carry out mediation.</p>
      <p>
        For citations of references, we prefer the use of square brackets and consecutive
numbers. Citations using labels or the author/year convention are also acceptable. The
following bibliography provides a sample reference list with entries for journal articles
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], an LNCS chapter [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], a book [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], proceedings without editors [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], as well as a URL
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>We can say that AI is still making its first steps towards its colossal role, which it
will have soon in the economy, defense, and national security, as well as education. At
the same time, it is very important to understand - according to the rules or standards
of which country the AI systems and programs created on their basis will function. If
the standards in the field of AI will mainly take into account the national characteristics
or interests of a single country, for example, the United States, then this country will
become the main developer and supplier of systems and tools based on AI to all other
countries and this will provide its leadership in this area.</p>
      <p>
        This, in particular, is provided in the plan of the US federal government (prepared
following Executive Order No. 13859), i.e. to create and develop technical standards
and related tools for AI systems. This plan aims to “... ensure that technical standards
... reflect federal priorities for innovation, public confidence in systems using artificial
intelligence technologies; develop international standards to promote and protect these
priorities” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. The Plan says that the United States should encourage the development
of appropriate technical standards to provide an agreed language and framework to
support the development and security of AI in different areas, including education.
4
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Results and Discussion</title>
      <p>Advances in AI development and use depend primarily on the government to play an
active and focused role in developing AI standards. Its functions include:
• support, research, and development of AI;
• active participation in the development of AI standards;
• purchasing and deploying standards-based products and services;
• development and implementation of supporting policies, including laws and
regulations.</p>
      <p>The development of AI standards for education in Russia would allow it to take a
leading position in the world in this area and receive considerable economic benefits.</p>
      <p>When creating a system of AI standards for education, the following nine areas
demand immediate attention: concepts and terminology, data and knowledge, human
interaction, metrics, network, performance testing, and reporting methodology, security,
risk management, reliability.</p>
      <p>
        The Russian system of AI standards for education should take into account the
"Concept for the development of the national standardization system of the Russian
Federation for the period until 2020", developed by the national body of the Russian
Federation for standardization - Rosstandart, approved by the Order of the Government of the
Russian Federation dated September 24, 2012, No. 1762-r [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ], as well as existing
standards in the field of information technology application in education.
      </p>
      <p>Russian AI standards should also take into account generally accepted international
regulations and norms, including those related to social and ethical issues, governance,
and privacy. While there is broad agreement that these issues should be taken into
account in AI standards, it is unclear how this should be done and whether there is still
sufficient scientific and technical basis to develop these provisions of the standards.</p>
      <p>Standards need to be complemented by appropriate tools to advance the development
and deployment of efficient, reliable, and trustworthy AI technologies. Tools that often
have overlapping applications include (but are not limited to):
 datasets in standardized formats, including metadata for training, validation, and
testing of artificial intelligence systems;
 tools for collecting and presenting knowledge and reasoning within AI systems;
 fully documented cases of application that provide a wide range of data and
information about specific applications of AI technologies and any standards or best
practice guidelines used when deciding how to deploy those applications;
 testing methods for validating and evaluating the effectiveness of AI technologies;
 metrics for quantifying and characterizing AI technologies;
 benchmarks, assessments, and descriptions of complex problems to stimulate
innovation;
 test benches of AI systems;
 tools for reporting and auditing.</p>
      <p>In the development of standards, in addition to the government, there is a need for
the wide participation of scientific and commercial organizations. To help institutions
make decisions about participation in the development of AI standards, their potential
participation can be grouped into four categories, from least to most active: monitoring,
participation, influence, and leadership.</p>
      <p>The government should coordinate the activities of all participants in the
development of AI standards to maximize efficiency and effectiveness, in particular,
highlighting specific horizontal or vertical areas to prioritize the development of AI standards,
determine the requirements for participation in the proposed standards activities,
analyze whether the current activities are consistent with areas of standards to the needs of
the education system, whether additional guidance is appropriate.</p>
      <p>When developing AI standards for the education system, it is necessary to make
maximum use of existing standards that are widely used in data transmission, medicine
and can be used or developed in a new context.</p>
      <p>A valid system of AI standards must interact with the educational information
environment, the Internet, and other systems. The OSI network model (The Open Systems
Interconnection model) can be considered as its possible structural prototype, (see
Fig. 3). Through this model, various network devices can communicate with each other.</p>
      <p>
        The standards of a valid AI system will also form a tiered structure, each of its parts
may also include several standards. Application-level (Application), in turn, can have
levels of standards, forming structures like the system UDDI (Universal Description
Discovery &amp; Integration) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Let’s consider a possible interaction of valid AI systems based on UDDI, which,
following the concept of the latter, may include the following components [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref14">13-14</xref>
        ]:
 white pages designed to provide information about the service provider of the AI
system: the name of the university, its address, contacts and known, as well as
unique identifiers of the AI system for operational search, as well as, for example,
a list of services provided (possibly in several languages);
 yellow pages that take into account the industry specification and AI categorizations
based on standard taxonomy. This information will allow future users of AI to use
it for comparison, as well as obtain more detailed and "voluminous" information on
the required topic, as well as simplify the search for the necessary AI;
 green pages containing technical information about the services of the given AI
system, its services, the organization of obtaining search and access to AI services, and
information about the linked services, ie. contact the web service after it is
discovered.
      </p>
      <p>
        For citations of references, we prefer the use of square brackets and consecutive
numbers. Citations using labels or the author/year convention are also acceptable. The
following bibliography provides a sample reference list with entries for journal articles
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], an LNCS chapter [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], a book [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], proceedings without editors [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], as well as a URL
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Thus, the created UDDI network will be a top-up structure over the Internet (network
over the network), which will make it possible to unite the system of good AI
universities on a global scale. In the process of creating AI standards for the educational
process, it is necessary to develop metrics and datasets to assess the relevance, reliability,
and reliability of attributes of AI systems. Standards that are being developed should
also minimize vulnerability to malicious attacks.</p>
      <p>An important issue is the training of personnel to work with AI systems and their
development. It is necessary to find specialists with the appropriate skills and training,
as well as to provide measures to encourage participation in the development of AI
standards for the education system.</p>
      <p>Within a single country, there is a need to maintain and expand public-private
partnerships to develop and use AI standards and related tools to promote robust and
credible AI.</p>
      <p>Strategic interaction with international organizations is also necessary to promote AI
standards in education, to track and understand the strategy for the development of AI
standards and initiatives of foreign governments and organizations.</p>
      <p>Developing AI standards is essential to set up research requirements and approaches
that help drive scientific breakthroughs in reliable and credible AI, give us confidence
in AI technologies and develop confidence in the design, development, and use of AI.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Given the importance of AI to economic, educational, and national security prospects,
dozens of countries have adopted national AI development programs. The process of
creating, developing, and applying AI cannot be implemented without the leadership
and organizing role of the government, which is responsible for developing the concept
of creating, developing, and using AI, being applied to different spheres of life
including the educational one. Within a single country, there is a need to maintain and expand
public-private partnerships to develop and use AI standards and related tools to promote
robust and credible AI.</p>
      <p>In the process of creating AI standards for the educational process, it is necessary to
develop metrics and datasets to assess the reliability and validity of the attributes of AI
systems. Standards that are being developed should also minimize vulnerability to
malicious attacks.</p>
      <p>An important issue is the training of personnel to work with AI systems and their
development. It is necessary to find specialists with the appropriate skills and training,
as well as to provide measures to encourage participation in the development of AI
standards for the education system.</p>
      <p>Strategic interaction with international organizations is also necessary to promote AI
standards in education, to track and understand the AI development strategy and
initiatives of foreign governments and organizations.</p>
      <p>Given the availability of existing information technology standards in the
educational process, data transfer, and information security, newly developed AI standards
should be linked to the latter in the form of a hierarchical network structure to exclude
contradictions and unnecessary resource costs.</p>
      <p>Developing AI standards is essential to set up research requirements and approaches
that help drive scientific breakthroughs in reliable and credible AI, give us confidence
in AI technologies and develop confidence in the design, development, and use of AI.</p>
      <p>Acknowledgments</p>
      <p>The reported study was funded by RFBR and Government of the Sevastopol
according to the research project № 18-410-920001</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Biriukov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Us Activities in the Field of Artificial Intelligence</article-title>
          . Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: law
          <volume>3</volume>
          (
          <issue>38</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>324</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>334</lpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wayne</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Holmes, Maya, Bialik, Charle,s Fadel:
          <article-title>Artificial Intelligence in Education Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. The Center for Curriculum Redesign</article-title>
          , Boston, MA,
          <volume>37</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Boulay</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Poulovassilis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Holmes</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mavrikis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Technologies to Close the Achievement Gap</article-title>
          . In: Luckin, Rose ed.
          <source>Enhancing Learning and Teaching with Technology</source>
          . London: UCL Institute of Education Press,
          <fpage>256</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>285</lpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shengquan</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Yu, Hannele, Niemi, Jon, Mason:
          <article-title>Shaping Future Schools with Digital Technology. An International Handbook</article-title>
          . Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore (
          <year>2019</year>
          ). DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/
          <fpage>978</fpage>
          -981-13-9439-3.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mavrikis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Holmes</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Intelligent Learning Environments: Design, Usage, and Analytics for Future Schools</article-title>
          . In: Yu S.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Niemi</surname>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mason</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (eds)
          <article-title>Shaping Future Schools with Digital Technology</article-title>
          .
          <source>Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education</source>
          . Springer, Singapore (
          <year>2019</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1007/
          <fpage>978</fpage>
          -981-13-9439-
          <issue>3</issue>
          _
          <fpage>4</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Crow</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Tyne and Luxton-Reilly, Andrew, Wünsche,
          <source>Burkhard: Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Programming Education: a Systematic Review</source>
          ,
          <fpage>53</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>62</lpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1145/3160489.3160492.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Koedinger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aleven</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>An Interview Reflection on «Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City»</article-title>
          .
          <source>Int'l J. Artificial Intelligence in Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>16</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>24</lpage>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0082-8.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Grawemeyer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mavrikis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Holmes</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gutiérrez-Santos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wiedmann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rummel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Affective Learning: Improving Engagement and Enhancing Learning with AffectAware Feedback. User Modeling</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>User-Adapted</surname>
            <given-names>Interaction</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <volume>27</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>40</lpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Janning</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schatten</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schmidt-Thieme</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Perceived Task-Difficulty Recognition from Log-File Information for the Use in Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring Systems</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>26</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>855</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>876</lpage>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ma</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Adesope</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O. O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nesbit</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Educational Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>106</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>901</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>918</lpage>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>U.S. LEADERSHIP IN</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>AI: A Plan for Federal Engagement in Developing Technical Standards and Related Tools Prepared in response to Executive Order 13859 Submitted on August 9 (</article-title>
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <article-title>The concept for the Development of the National Standardization System of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020</article-title>
          , http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902371448, last accessed
          <year>2020</year>
          /07/15.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <article-title>Rajaram Anand Standard overview</article-title>
          UDDI.
          <year>2001</year>
          . ВРМ World. Intersoft Lab, https://iso.ru/ru/press-center/journal/1863.phtml.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>14. UDDI - Overview, https://www.tutorialspoint.com/uddi/uddi_overview.htm.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>