<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Automatic Sexism Detection with Multilingual Transformer Models</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>AIT FHSTP@EXIST</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Schutz Mina</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Boeck Jaqueline</string-name>
          <email>jaquelineboeck1@gmx.at</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Liakhovets Daria</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Slijepcevic Djordje</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Kirchknopf Armin</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Hecht Manuel</string-name>
          <email>manuelhecht8@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Bogensperger Johannes</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Schlarb Sven</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Schindler Alexander</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Zeppelzauer Matthias</string-name>
          <email>matthias.zeppelzauerg@fhstp.ac.at</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>1210 Vienna</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AT">Austria</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>St. Polten University of Applied Sciences</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>3100 St. Polten</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AT">Austria</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Sexism has become an increasingly signi cant problem on social networks in recent years. The rst shared task on sEXism Identi cation in Social neTworks (EXIST) at IberLEF 2021 is an international competition in the eld of Natural Language Processing (NLP) with the aim to automatically identify sexism in social media content by applying machine learning methods. Thereby sexism detection is formulated as a coarse (binary) classi cation problem and a ne-grained classi cation task that distinguishes multiple types of sexist content (e.g., dominance, stereotyping, and objecti cation). This paper presents the contribution of the AIT FHSTP team at the EXIST2021 benchmark for both tasks. To solve the task,s we applied two multilingual transformer models, one based on multilingual BERT and one based on XLM-R. Our approach uses two di erent strategies to adapt the transformers to the detection of sexist content: rst, unsupervised pre-training with additional data and second, supervised ne-tuning with additional and augmented data. For both tasks our best model is XLM-R with unsupervised pre-training on the EXIST data and additional datasets and ne-tuning on the provided dataset. The best run for the binary classi cation (task 1) achieves a macro F1-score of 0.7752 and scores 5th rank in the benchmark; for the multiclass classi cation (task 2) our best submission scores 6th rank with a macro F1-score of 0.5589.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Sexism Detection</kwd>
        <kwd>Sexism Identi cation</kwd>
        <kwd>Social Media Retrieval</kwd>
        <kwd>Transformer Models</kwd>
        <kwd>mBERT</kwd>
        <kwd>XLM-R</kwd>
        <kwd>Natural Language Processing</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Discriminatory views against women are a common occurrence in the online
environment. It's detection is challenging since sexism and misogyny may
appear in di erent forms. The rst shared task on sEXism Identi cation in Social
neTworks (EXIST) at IberLEF 2021 [12, 9] represents a systematic benchmark
that attempts to tackle this challenge via machine learning and natural language
understanding (NLU). The benchmark covers a wide spectrum of sexist content
and aims to di erentiate di erent types of sexist content. This paper presents
our contribution to the benchmark, describes our overall approach, the methods
and models applied and summarises the obtained results. We summarise our
results for both tasks: the binary sexism identi cation task (task 1) and the sexism
categorization task (task 2). The EXIST benchmark incorporates English and
Spanish content from Twitter and Gab which we account for by multilingual
modeling. The peculiarity and contribution of our approach is the use of
comprehensive data augmentation and the integration of external (unlabeled) data
to make the classi cation models more robust.</p>
      <p>Our paper is structured as the following: Section 2 describes our
methodological approach, describing the employed datasets and models. Our experimental
setup will be explained in Section 3 of this paper, followed by a documentation
of the results (Section 4) and discussion and nal conclusion (Section 5).
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Methodological Approach</title>
      <p>
        A core challenge of the EXIST benchmark is the rather small size of the
provided dataset (approx. 7000 training instances). This rather small size makes
the robust training of complex NLP methods like transformers di cult. For
this reason, we approach the challenge with di erent transfer learning
strategies. As a basis for modeling the textual content, we apply two pre-trained
multilingual transformer models: mBERT [15] and XLM-R [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. To adapt these
general-purpose models to the task of sexism identi cation and categorization,
we propose di erent data augmentation strategies and extend the dataset with
similar content from other datasets. The additional data is used to pre-train
and/or ne-tune the transformer models, where in our terminology pre-training
refers to unsupervised pre-training and ne-tuning refers to supervised tuning
of the classi cation layers. Our main contribution is the investigation of the
following training strategies.
      </p>
      <p>{ Pre-Training Strategy: Massively parametrised models such as
transformers tend to over t on small datasets [13]. To overcome this issue pre-trained
models are applied. In our experiments we evaluate di erent variants of
pretrained transformers and further pre-train them in an unsupervised fashion
on semantically related datasets.
{ Fine-Tuning Strategy: When using pre-trained models, it is necessary to
adapt the models to the underlying task. For this purpose, either all layers
or only the upper layers of the model are ne-tuned to the task-speci c data.
Our aim here is to make the higher level feature representations in the model
sensitive to the speci c task.
{ Fusion Strategy: As a third strategy we fuse predictions of the best models
obtained by the previous two strategies to achieve a prediction.</p>
      <p>A more detailed description of the implementation of these two strategies is
provided in Section 3 and the results obtained with these approaches are presented
in Section 4.
2.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>EXIST Data</title>
        <p>The challenge contribution is based on the EXIST2021 dataset which was
provided by the EXIST2021 challenge [12]. The dataset contains 6977 training
instances in English and Spanish. In total there are 3426 English and 3541
Spanish social media postings from Twitter and Gap. The test set contains 4368
instances, split into 2208 English and 2160 Spanish postings from mentioned
sources. They are annotated in a binary fashion (task 1) as either sexist or
non-sexist ; and in a more ne-grained categorization (task 2) as:
ideologicalinequality, objecti cation, stereotyping-dominance, misogyny-non-sexual-violence,
sexual-violence, non-sexist.</p>
        <p>We evaluated the in uence of di erent pre-processing steps on the EXIST
dataset (for both languages) covering ltering and normalization of varying
intensities:
{ Removing only hashtags: e.g., to avoid over- tting on speci c hashtags.
{ Removing only punctuation
{ Removing mentions, hashtags, and links
{ Removing mentions, hashtags, links, digits, punctuation, and non-ASCII
symbols
Based on related work on sexism detection [11] and hate speech detection with
transformer models [10], we decided to test di erent pre-processing pipelines
for both languages. Also, corresponding approaches have shown promising
results in detecting disinformation with transformer models and using various
pre-processing pipelines [14]. Of all pre-processing steps, the last pipeline had
the best ne-tuning results for the multilingual approach. Deleting punctuation
and non-ASCII symbols seems to have a higher in uence on ne-tuning
transformer models, when we add Spanish data. Further pre-processing steps such
as stopword-removal, stemming or lemmatising were omitted since they are not
required by the applied contextualised transformer models or would decrease
their performance. For tokenisation the models' built-in tokenisers were used.
2.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>External Data</title>
        <p>
          Data augmentation is one of the two strategies being pursued with our challenge
contribution. In addition to the EXIST dataset provided by the organisers we
pre-train di erent models on additional datasets which are semantically related
to the EXIST dataset. The intention is to learn additional patterns from
semantically similar or aligned tasks and to transfer them onto the EXIST tasks. We
conducted experiments using two additional datasets - speci cally the MeTwo [11]
and HatEval2019 [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ] dataset. In our nal submissions those datasets were used
to pre-train/ ne-tune our models.
        </p>
        <p>{ MeTwo: is a Spanish dataset which consists of 3600 tweets to detect sexist
innuendo, behaviors and expressions. The labels of the tweets are: SEXIST,
NON SEXIST and DOUBTFUL. The original dataset consists of tweet-IDs
labeled as "status id" and the associated label for the category. Content and
metadata of the corresponding tweets was provided by the creator of the
dataset upon request.
{ HatEval2019: is a dataset which can be used for detecting hate speech
against women and immigrants. It is composed of 13000 English tweets and
6000 Spanish ones. From a total of 19600 tweets, 9091 have a negative
relation towards immigrants and 10509 against women. Furthermore, the tweets
are divided into 3 categories:</p>
        <p>Hate Speech (HS): Binary value that indicates if hate speech against
women or immigrants occurs in the tweet or not.</p>
        <p>Target Range (TR): If hate speech occurs in the tweet, the target range
speci es whether it targets a generic group of people or a speci c
individual.</p>
        <p>Aggressiveness (AG): If hate speech occurs in the tweet, additional
information is provided whether this is aggressive or not.</p>
        <p>We augmented the EXIST and the additional datasets by translating each post
into the respective other language (i.e., from English to Spanish and vice versa).
Due to this procedure, an English and a Spanish version of each dataset was
created. The online tool Google Translator was used for this purpose.
2.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Models</title>
        <p>To model the textual data, we employed two di erent transformers [16]:
multilingual BERT (mBERT) and XLM-RoBERTa (XLM-R).</p>
        <p>
          { mBERT is based on the original BERT (Bidirectional Encoder
Representations from transformers) model [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ]. Unlike the original transformer
architecture, BERT only consists of an encoder and is pre-trained on a large dataset
containing content from Wikipedia and the BookCorpus. Pre-training the
model can be done with two methods, by capturing a sentence in a
bidirectional way with the attention mechanism, i.e., Masked Language Modelling
and Next Sentence Prediction. However, BERT is only a monolingual model.
Thus, we employ mBERT, which is trained on Wikipedia content in 100
languages and thus allows for multilingual modeling [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ].
{ XLM-R is a multilingual model trained on 100 languages, similar to mBERT.
        </p>
        <p>
          Unlike the latter, XLM-R is not trained on Wikipedia data but on
monolingual CommonCrawl data. The model shows improved cross-lingual language
understanding in the results shown in the original paper [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ]. It even
outperforms mBERT on several standard NLP benchmark tasks [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ]. The model
architecture itself is a combination of two transformer models: XLM [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ] and
RoBERTa [8]. The latter is a monolingual optimised version of the original
BERT model and does not support the Next Sentence Prediction pre-training
variant in order to achieve a better performance than the basic BERT model.
In contrast to the basic XLM model, XLM-R is able to recognise the language
in the content by itself on the basis of the speci ed input IDs [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ].
3
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Experimental Setup</title>
      <p>
        For this system we used the already pre-trained XLM-R [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] and re-trained the
model with additional epochs using the RoBERTa Masked Language Modeling
(MLM) task on the original (not pre-processed and not translated) EXIST,
HatEval2019 and MeTwo datasets. We pre-trained the model for 25 epochs on each
of the datasets, with a batch size of 16, a learning rate of 5e 5, and AdamW as
an optimiser. Then we ne-tuned the resulting model for the text classi cation
task, just using the EXIST training data. However, we ne-tuned the model
only for task 2 (multi-class classi cation) and then obtained the labels for task 1
(binary classi cation) from the multi-class model predictions. We ne-tuned our
model for 3 epochs with a batch size of 8, learning rate of 1e 5, AdamW as an
optimiser, 500 warm-up steps and a weight decay of 0.01.
3.2
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Supervised Fine-Tuning of mBERT: mBERT-FineT-E</title>
        <p>We used an already pre-trained multilingual, uncased BERT model (model size:
L=12, H=768, A=12; number of total parameters = 110M) [15] and ne-tuned
it on the provided EXIST dataset and its translations. Beforehand, the data
was pre-processed by removing mentions, hashtags, links, digits, punctuation,
and non-ASCII symbols. In a rst step, we ne-tuned the pre-trained mBERT
using only the provided EXIST dataset. Subsequently, we conducted further
experiments using the translated EXIST dataset and the additional datasets
(HatEval2019 and MeTwo). We ne-tuned the pre-trained mBERT for all
combinations of the datasets with and without translations. The best results in the
development phase were achieved using only the EXIST dataset and
translations. For both tasks, the proposed mBERT was trained separately using an
Adam optimiser with a learning rate of 1e 5 and an epsilon of 1e 8. We preset
the maximum sequence length for our mBERT to 384 and the batch size to 8.
Furthermore, we empirically determined the optimal number of epochs for both
tasks, i.e., 6 epochs.
4</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>The validation and test results for both tasks are presented in Table 1. The
last column in Table 1 lists the ranking of our submissions in the EXIST 2021
benchmark. The top ranked submission in the overall benchmark achieved an
accuracy of 78.04% and a macro-averaged F1-score of 78.02% for task 1 (team:
\AI-UPV") and an accuracy of 65.77% and a macro-averaged F1-score of 57.87%
for task 2 (team: \AI-UPV").
4.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Task 1</title>
        <p>Fine-Tuning Strategy: For run 1, we used the mBERT ne-tuned on the
(preprocessed) EXIST dataset with translations. In our approach in run 1, mBERT
seems to over t on the training data, as the validation accuracy of 79.97% is
signi cantly higher than the test accuracy of 71.82%.</p>
        <p>Pre-Training Strategy: In run 2, we aggregated the predictions from the
XLM-R approach trained for task 2, where we pre-trained the model on the
EXIST, HatEval2019 and MeTwo datasets (without translations). Our approach
with pre-training XLM-R in run 2 achieves the best results. These results are
closely followed by the late fusion approach. The performance in run 2 (and
run 3) is similar for our validation and the test set, which indicates that this
approach generalises well. Our run 2 ranked 5th overall in the benchmark and
performed only 0.52% less accurate (in terms of classi cation accuracy) than the
overall best submission in the EXIST benchmark.</p>
        <p>We conducted experiments with the original XLM-R that we ne-tuned on
the original (non pre-processed) EXIST dataset and the additional datasets (see
Table 2). Interestingly, the model performed signi cantly better for English
content than for Spanish content. Fine-tuning on the additional datasets did not
improve the results, but rather made them worse. Comparing the results from
the last row in Table 2 with our run 2 for task 1 from Table 1, we can see that
the pre-training yielded an advantage over the ne-tuning.</p>
        <p>Fusion Strategy: For run 3, we performed a late fusion. The predictions were
determined by calculating the maximum of the the sum of the predicted
classwise probabilities of run 1, run 2, and an additional mBERT model ne-tuned
on the (pre-processed) EXIST and MeTwo dataset (without translations). Our
run 3 performed slightly less accurate (in terms of classi cation accuracy) than
run 2 and ranked 10th overall in the benchmark.
4.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Task 2</title>
        <p>Fine-Tuning Strategy: For task 2 and run 1, we again used the mBERT
ne-tuned on the (pre-processed) EXIST dataset with translations. The results
indicate that mBERT seems to over t on the training data, as the validation
accuracy of 68.24% is signi cantly higher than the test accuracy of 59.76%.
Pre-Training Strategy: In run 2, we applied the XLM-R approach, where
we pre-trained the model on the EXIST, HatEval2019 and MeTwo datasets
(without translations). For task 2, a similar pattern can be seen in the results as
for task 1. Our approach in run 2 achieved the best results of our or submissions
and ranked 6th in the EXIST Challenge, performing only 1.98% less accurate
(in terms of macro-averaged F1-score) than the overall best submission in the
benchmark.</p>
        <p>Fusion Strategy: For run 3, we also performed a late fusion in a similar manner
as for task 1, but only with the predicted probabilities of run 1 and run 2. The
classi cation accuracy of the late fusion approach in run 3 is identical to the
result in run 2. For the macro F1 score of 55.59%, results show a slight di erence
compared to run 2.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Discussion &amp; Conclusion</title>
      <p>
        In this paper, we described our submission to the EXIST2021 benchmark, which
consists of two tasks on the classi cation of sexist content. In our experiments
we found that the unsupervised pre-training strategy of the XLM-R model [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]
with additional external data is the most promising strategy, leading to an
F1score of 77.52% in task 1 and 55.89% in task 2. The ne-tuning strategy of
the mBERT model alone using our augmented corpus is outperformed by the
former strategy and shows signs of over tting. In general, the use of additional
data (either external datasets or translations) resulted in improvement for both
strategies. As a nal remark, our experiments reveal that the ne-tuning of the
whole model on domain-speci c data was more e ective compared to the pure
re-training of the classi cation layer only.
6
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>This contribution has been funded by the FFG Project \Defalsif-AI" (Austrian
security research programme KIRAS of the Federal Ministry of Agriculture,
Regions and Tourism(BMLRT), grant no. 879670) and the FFG Project \Big
Data Analytics" (grant no. 866880).
and Short Papers). pp. 4171{4186. Association for Computational
Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Jun 2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423,
https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N19-1423
7. Lan, Z., Chen, M., Goodman, S., Gimpel, K., Sharma, P., Soricut, R.: Albert: A
lite bert for self-supervised learning of language representations (2019)
8. Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M.,
Zettlemoyer, L., Stoyanov, V.: Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining
approach (2019)
9. Montes, M., Rosso, P., Gonzalo, J., Aragon, E., Agerri, R., Angel Alvarez Carmona,
M., Alvarez Mellado, E., de Albornoz, J.C., Chiruzzo, L., Freitas, L., Adorno, H.G.,
Gutierrez, Y., Zafra, S.M.J., Lima, S., de Arco, F.M.P., (eds.), M.T.: Proceedings
of the iberian languages evaluation forum (iberlef 2021). In: CEUR Workshop
Proceedings (2021)
10. Mozafari, M., Farahbakhsh, R., Crespi, N.: Hate speech detection and
racial bias mitigation in social media based on bert model. PLOS
ONE 15(8), 1{26 (08 2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237861,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237861
11. Rodr guez-Sanchez, F., Carrillo-de-Albornoz, J., Plaza, L.: Automatic classi cation
of sexism in social networks: An empirical study on twitter data. IEEE Access 8,
219563{219576 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042604
12. Rodr guez-Sanchez, F., de Albornoz, J.C., Plaza, L., Gonzalo, J., Rosso, P., Comet,
M., Donoso, T.: Overview of exist 2021: sexism identi cation in social networks.</p>
      <p>Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 67(0) (2021)
13. Schindler, A., Lidy, T., Rauber, A.: "comparing shallow versus deep neural network
architectures for automatic music genre classi cation", booktitle="in proceedings
of 9th forum media technology (fmt2016), st. polten, austria; 23.11. 2016-24.11.
2016; in:" proceedings of the 9th forum media technology (fmt2016)", st. polten
university of applied sciences, institute of creative media technologies,(2016), isbn:
9781326881184; 5 s.
14. Schutz, M., Schindler, A., Siegel, M., Nazemi, K.: Automatic fake news
detection with pre-trained transformer models. In: Bimbo, D., et al (eds.)
Pattern Recognition. ICPR International Workshops and Challenges. ICPR 2021.
Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences. vol. 12667. Springer, Cham (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68787-8 45
15. Turc, I., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: Well-read students learn better: On
the importance of pre-training compact models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08962
(2019)
16. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser,
L.u., Polosukhin, I.: Attention is all you need. In: Guyon, I., Luxburg, U.V., Bengio,
S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in
Neural Information Processing Systems 30, pp. 5998{6008. Curran Associates, Inc.
(2017), http://papers.nips.cc/paper/7181-attention-is-all-you-need.pdf
17. Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P.,
Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., Davison, J., Shleifer, S., von Platen, P., Ma, C.,
Jernite, Y., Plu, J., Xu, C., Scao, T.L., Gugger, S., Drame, M., Lhoest, Q., Rush,
A.M.: Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. In: Proceedings
of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing:
System Demonstrations. pp. 38{45. Association for Computational Linguistics,
Online (Oct 2020), https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.emnlp-demos.6
18. Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., Le, Q.V.: Xlnet:
Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding (2019)</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1. Bert multilingual models, https://github.com/googleresearch/bert/blob/master/multilingual.md, accessed:
          <fpage>2010</fpage>
          -06-02
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huggingface</surname>
          </string-name>
          xlm-roberta, https://huggingface.co/transformers/modeldoc/ xlmroberta.html, accessed:
          <fpage>2010</fpage>
          -06-02
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Basile</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bosco</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fersini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nozza</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Patti</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Rangel</given-names>
            <surname>Pardo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Rosso</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Sanguinetti</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.:</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>SemEval-2019 task 5: Multilingual detection of hate speech against immigrants and women in twitter</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>54</volume>
          {
          <fpage>63</fpage>
          . Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (Jun
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Conneau</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Khandelwal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goyal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chaudhary</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wenzek</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guzman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Grave</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ott</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zettlemoyer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stoyanov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale</article-title>
          . CoRR abs/
          <year>1911</year>
          .02116 (
          <year>2019</year>
          ), http://arxiv.org/abs/
          <year>1911</year>
          .02116
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>CONNEAU</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lample</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>Cross-lingual language model pretraining</article-title>
          . In: Wallach,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Larochelle</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Beygelzimer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , A.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>d'AlcheBuc</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fox</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garnett</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (eds.)
          <source>Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems</source>
          . vol.
          <volume>32</volume>
          . Curran Associates, Inc. (
          <year>2019</year>
          ), https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/ le/c04c19c2c2474dbf5f7ac4372c5b9af1- Paper.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Devlin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Toutanova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          : BERT:
          <article-title>Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies</source>
          , Volume
          <volume>1</volume>
          (Long
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>