<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Ontology Alignment and the Two DLs (Abstract of Invited Talk)?</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz</string-name>
          <email>ernesto.jimenez-ruiz@city.ac.uk</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>City, University of London</institution>
          ,
          <country country="UK">United Kingdom</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>SIRIUS, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo</institution>
          ,
          <country country="NO">Norway</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The Ontology Matching community has been very active since the first steps of the Semantic Web. The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) has been running annually since 2004.1 The objective of the OAEI is to perform a systematic evaluation of ontology matching systems to conduct a comparison on the same basis and to enable the reproducibility of the results. The OAEI 2020 included 12 tracks of different nature and in a diverse set of domains, each of them including one or more matching tasks [1]. Despite the amazing evaluation and system development efforts around the Ontology Matching community, there are still several challenges that need to be tackled from both the evaluation and system sides: (i) better connection with real-world needs and user satisfaction, (ii) discovery of mappings beyond atomic subsumption and equivalence, (iii) combination with machine learning methods, and (iv) awareness of the logical compatibility of the ontologies. In the presentation I will give an overview of the OAEI and the above challenges with a special focus on challenges (iii) and (iv), i.e., the two DLs (Deep Learning and Description Logics). While Deep Learning techniques are introducing elegant solutions with promising results [2], the Ontology Matching community should not forget about the need of computing alignment sets that preserve the logical consistency (possibly with only intended entailments) of the integrated ontology (assuming that the alignment is interpreted as a set of Description Logic axioms) [3,4].</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>? Copyright © 2021 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons
License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
1 OAEI campaign: http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Abd</given-names>
            <surname>Nikooie Pour</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Algergawy</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Amini</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Faria</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>D.</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.:
          <article-title>Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2020</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Ontology Matching</source>
          . (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>92</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>138</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jiménez-Ruiz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Horrocks</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Antonyrajah</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hadian</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Augmenting Ontology Alignment by Semantic Embedding and Distant Supervision</article-title>
          . In: The Semantic Web - 18th International Conference,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ESWC</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <article-title>(</article-title>
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>392</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>408</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jiménez-Ruiz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Meilicke</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cuenca Grau</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Horrocks</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Evaluating Mapping Repair Systems with Large Biomedical Ontologies</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 26th International Workshop on Description Logics</source>
          . (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
          <fpage>246</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>257</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Solimando</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jiménez-Ruiz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guerrini</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>Minimizing conservativity violations in ontology alignments: algorithms and evaluation</article-title>
          .
          <source>Knowl. Inf. Syst</source>
          .
          <volume>51</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
          <fpage>775</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>819</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>