<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Agritology: A Decision Support System for Local Farmers in Malta and Palestine</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Francesca Gauci</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Maath Musleh</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Linnaeus University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>P G Vejdes väg, 351 95 Växjö</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="SE">Sweden</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>We aim to provide a platform to act as a single-source of information to support decision making in the growth and cultivation of crops in local farms. The primary objective of our work is to promote sustainable development, by encouraging local farmers in Malta and Palestine to adopt seasonal and organic farming, in line with the second Sustainable Development Goal (SDG2) of the United Nations. Through SDG2, the United Nations aims to “end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture”. The secondary objective of this study is to promote the local language and terminology. Accordingly, the information on the dashboard will be displayed in English, Maltese and Arabic.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Smart Agriculture</kwd>
        <kwd>Ontology</kwd>
        <kwd>Semantic Web</kwd>
        <kwd>Farming</kwd>
        <kwd>Urban Agriculture</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>1.1. Research Questions
Following a thorough analysis of related work, we have defined the following research questions
for this study:
1. RQ1 – How to improve the sustainability of farming in Malta and Palestine?
2. RQ2 – How to provide simple and eficient support for farming decision-making?
3. RQ3 – How to preserve the ecosystem of the soil and improve its quality?</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Methodology</title>
      <p>The work required in realising this project can be divided into two main components: the
development of the agricultural ontology and the implementation of the dashboard application.
Competency questions were identified to be able to construct requirements and, at a later stage,
evaluate our ontology.</p>
      <p>Prior to developing the ontology, we carried out a data collection exercise through exploratory
research. Data sources were considered relevant if they fulfilled the requirements according to
the competency questions. The main data sources used are the following:</p>
      <p>In terms of dashboard application development, we have adopted a Rapid Application
Development (RAD). It was conducted in five main steps, illustrated in Figure 1. Firstly, an analysis
of the research area was conducted to identify and finalise requirements. This was followed by
an iterative cycle of three steps: prototyping, gathering feedback, and testing. The final step
involves the presentation of the final application.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. User Flow and Dashboard</title>
      <p>We employed an iterative prototyping approach to build the optimal user flow. Prototyping was
conducted in three phases. Firstly, a user persona was defined to represent the target user of the
dashboard, a set of wireframes were built using Figma4, a collaborative prototyping software.
Once the design was finalised, development on the user interfaces was initiated 5.
1https://foemalta.org/whats-in-season/
2https://agrikoltura.gov.mt/en/agricultural_directorate/Documents/nitratesActionProgrammeRegulations/ntr001.pdf
3https://www.ekoskola.org.mt/partners/we-eat-responsibly-nieklu-bresponsabbilta/
4http://figma.com/
5A semi-functioning prototype is available on: http://agritology.herokuapp.com</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Ontology</title>
      <p>We constructed the ontology using Protégé 5.5.0, an open-source software developed by Stanford
University. Agri ontology was implemented using the Web Ontology Language (OWL).</p>
      <p>The annotations were used in the ontology to provide references that could help reuse
the ontology in diferent contexts. It includes comments on data properties to clarify them.
Furthermore, a Maltese and Arabic (Palestinian dialect) translations were provided using the
rdfs:seeAlso annotation for all the instances created in the ontology.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Results</title>
      <p>When evaluating the final ontology with the initial research questions, it can be concluded that
it satisfies the initial research questions posed by this study.</p>
      <p>An overview of how this was achieved in relation to the competency questions:
• In RQ1, we sought to find ways to promote and improve sustainable farming practices in
Malta and Palestine. We took the approach of focusing on promoting seasonal farming
through our decision support system. This is achieved in two ways, where the user can
either opt to start the flow by selecting what to plant and get recommended the ideal
planting season, or else, they can select when they would like to start and the application
returns a list of what crops can be planted in that period.</p>
      <p>The ideal season is deducted from the assertion of minimum and maximum temperatures
suitable for planting each crop. In contrast to asserting the month, this approach makes
the ontology reusable for other applications that target diferent locations. We process this
data compared to the location’s climate data to infer knowledge about suitable seasons
for each plant. The information provided can be more accurate; however, the achieved
accuracy is acceptable within the time scope of this project. We compared the results
inferred by the application to the season calendar retrieved from diferent sources. All
inferences were within the acceptable range of the season.
• In RQ2, we focused on providing a simple and eficient support system for farming
decision-making. The application relays data from the ontology in an intuitive manner. It
covers the overall timeline of planting crops, from seed requirements to expected harvest
amount. The app relies on commonly understood icons and terms that communicate
information with less reliance on bulk text. Thus, we avoid confusions that inexperienced
farmers might face. We reorganised the application to detect location automatically,
and hence making the application more eficient. This functionality is based on the
assumption that while looking for the relevant information, our target user will be at the
actual location where they would like to plant the crops.
• In the last research question, RQ3, our aim was to provide information related to the
preservation of the ecosystem of the soil and improvement of its quality. Our application
achieves this through companions, where it suggests other crops that can be planted
together with the main crop to improve the quality and nutrition of the soil. Moreover,
the ontology that we have developed can be employed to implement further functionality
in the dashboard application, specifically for identifying fertiliser needs for the soil and
further improve its quality.</p>
      <p>We can conclude that our work fulfills the research objectives posed by this study, as we have
presented a solution which promotes sustainable farming in Malta and Palestine, while also
providing a simple and eficient support for decision-making.</p>
      <p>The dashboard application has significant potential for future work and expansion in the
ifeld. Firstly, the decision-support system could extend to include soil testing, an aspect which
is already catered for through the ontology that we have built. Moreover, the ontology could be
extended to enable the application to advise farmers on irrigation decision-making.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>