<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Knowledge Graphs: Detection of Outdated News</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nicolas Ferranti</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Astrid Krickl</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Markus Nissl</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>TU Wien</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Vienna</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AT">Austria</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Vienna University of Economics and Business</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Vienna</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AT">Austria</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Every day, millions of news stories, articles, and blogs are shared and read throughout the world. As an input, recent study results and everyday occurrences shape how news are released; consequently, it is critical to work with current information, as obsolete information might be incorrect and dangerous in some circumstances, for example, false information about who won the presidential election in the United States, can lead to dangerous public confrontations, as we could observe. In this research, we propose a work ow for the detection of outdated articles with Knowledge Graphs, and analyze the reactivity of updates in DBPedia and Wikidata as possible sources for outdated news.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Outdated News</kwd>
        <kwd>Entity Linking</kwd>
        <kwd>Knowledge Graphs</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Every day, people are exposed to thousands of news stories containing
out-ofdate information, such as the current president of a country or o cial guidelines
and limitations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Even books contain outdated
information based on obsolete studies and old techniques which are not used
anymore. However, when people read such articles, they are unaware and have little
possibility of detecting that the information is no longer valid. Given the volume
of published literature worldwide, it is apparent that an automatic method for
determining the veracity of news stories is essential. The usage of open-source
knowledge graphs (KGs) such as DBPedia or Wikidata, which enable centralized
storage for structured information, is one option for verifying news articles. In
this paper, we present a work ow on the integration of DBPedia and Wikidata
entries for outdated news detection. For this, we build on state-of-the art retrieval
and linking technologies. In addition, we analyse the contemporaneity of current
DBPedia and Wikidata entries. For this, we study the current information as
well as the change history of important personalities.</p>
      <p>
        The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: In Section 2 we provide
related work in the area of outdated news detection. In Section 3, we present a
work ow for using open source KGs to check for outdated news, and in Section 4
we study and compare the reactivity of open source KGs. Finally, we conclude
the paper in Section 5.
Outdated news detection is a type of fake news detection that is generally
described as news whose correctness is dependent on a speci ed time interval.
Ongoing research mostly focus on fake news detection [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5 ref7">5, 7</xref>
        ], in the sense of
intentionally and veri able false [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], where di erent proposals such as expert
fact-checkers, crowdsourcing, natural language processing, or machine learning
tools are discussed. In comparison, outdated news require di erent tools, that are
aware of temporal information to detect whether certain facts in articles are still
valid. In this context, KGs that store temporal information about the data can
be used to validate the news status, as long as they also keep up-to-date facts.
Wikidata and DBpedia are among the main cross-domain KGs on the Linked
Data Web, although both are based on Wikipedia content, they are very di
erent from each other. David and Guerra et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] present a comparison between
Wikidata and DBpedia using four main categories: Intrinsic, Contextual,
Representational, and Accessibility. When it comes to timeliness, which is relevant for
the outdated news scenario because is based on update rate, the authors show
that Wikidata was up to 500 editions/minute while DBpedia is updated about
once per month. Frequently updated facts are an important factor in choosing
KG, but there are other features that should be taken into account, depending
on the purpose of the application. The relationship of KGs and news can be
explored in both ways, for di erent goals. In the literature, there are papers using
news to update facts in KGs [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. Our approach di ers from the others using the
opposite direction, consuming the KG facts to check the news.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Detection of outdated article</title>
      <p>
        We present the work ow for detecting outdated news in Figure 1, which uses
KGs to determine whether information in the news is outdated, and then we
discuss possible extensions to the basic work ow. The detection process begins
with the publication of a new news story, which is automatically fed into an
analysis pipeline. Following that, we will outline the pipeline, which is made up
of four modules:
President Date Entity and value
Donald Trump DBpedia 2021 June o ce:"President of the United States"@en
Donald Trump DBpedia 2018 June o ce:"President of the United States"@en
Donald Trump Wikidata 2021 June Position held (P39): President of the United States
Donald Trump Wikidata 2017 February Position held (P39): President of the United States
Barack Obama DBpedia 2021 June o ce: 44
Barack Obama DBpedia 2015 June o ce: 44
Barack Obama DBpedia 2015 June shortDescription: "American politician, 44th
President of the United States"@en
Barack Obama Wikidata 2021 June Position held (P39): President of the United States
Barack Obama Wikidata 2013 February Position held (P39): President of the United States
The entity linking tool links entities in the news article to KGs such as
DBPedia. This is performed by using semantic annotation tools, such as DBpedia
Spotlight [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] or Dandelion [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] to produce links to the DBPedia ontology which
uniquely identify more than 270 resource types, for example, locations, persons,
or companies.
      </p>
      <p>An annotated news dataset stores the identi ed links in the article with an
associated timestamp of the link detection.</p>
      <p>
        The news analyzer (e.g., a deep learning and/or rule-based system) analyzes
annotated news article for outdated information by comparing resources of
entities from di erent timestamps. Periodically, or at least when a request rises, the
news analyzer extracts the entity links with its corresponding timestamp from
the annotated news dataset. Afterwards, it gets the (i) current facts of the KG
(for the entity links), and (ii) historical facts at the timestamp from the
historical KG (e.g., DBPedia Wayback machine [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]) in order to compare, if something
changed.
      </p>
      <p>The question answering tool asks the reader of the news if the outdated
information was correctly identi ed. This can be used to train the news analyzer.</p>
      <p>As an example to this work ow, we use a news article of 2018, which contains
information about Donald Trump. The entity linking tool links the entity Donald
Trump to the DBPedia entry. When the analyzer analysis the article in 2021, it
would receive for example, the following fact for 2018 hDonald Trump, president,
Americai in the historical KG, but in 2021 the fact is not present anymore.
The reader gets noti ed that some information about Donald Trump has been
changed.
3.1</p>
      <p>Extension of the Basic Work ow
In the basic work ow, we compare independent of the article's content the entire
information of the identi ed links. To enhance this approach, we propose three
possible improvements:
Contextual Links. Instead of linking resources in the article to the KG, important
concepts of the article are extracted as facts. For example, one can extract a fact
hDonald T rump; president; Americai from the article and link it to the KG.
Comparison of Articles. In addition to KGs, similar contextual links of di erent
articles can be used together with temporal information to extract the currently
valid information. This can be used to update either suggest updates to the KGs
or be used in the news analyzer to mark articles as outdated.</p>
      <p>Post-Processing. Detected changes in the KG can be ltered by checking whether
the information is present in the news article. If such change is not relevant, it
is discarded and the article is not marked as outdated.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Analysis of DBPedia and Wikidata</title>
      <p>
        In this section, we study the reactivity of Wikidata and DBPedia for the veri
cation of outdated articles, and perform some experiments. We analyze knowledge
about the topic of the presidents Donald Trump and Barack Obama of the USA
to see if there is enough information to verify the claims, as the president of
America is one of the most important politician in the world. In order to access
current and outdated knowledge we use historical data from Wikidata and the
Wayback Machine from DBpedia [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], the results are discussed in Table 1. As it
can be seen, the data of Wikidata and DBpedia do not match, however some of
the information is not topical. For example, Donald Trump's o ce says
president of the United States which is not correct anymore. Also for some entities
the type of information changed in between presidents for example the entity
"o ce" was a number (44) for Barack Obama, as it is a text for Trump. More
information about Barack Obama's position can be found in the
shortDescription. One entity that got an update on Wikidata is the Position held, as they
refer to start dates and later added end dates.
      </p>
      <p>
        As Table 1 shows, the values are not always clear and up to date. To
determine the relevance of the information, we compare the frequency of updates on
Wikidata and DBpedia. Because both knowledge graphs use a di erent method
of gathering information, one approach may be better suited to this use case.
DBpedia's information originates on Wikipedia and Wikimedia, and while
anyone can edit these sources, DBpedia transforms this information and its changes
into a DBpedia release multiple times per year [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. In comparison, Wikidata
allows to access the newest version of its Knowledge Graph and has no update
cycles. In addition, it is possible to query the history of changes of an entity.
We analyzed the frequency of changes for Donald Trump on a monthly basis in
Figure 2, which demonstrates that the entity is updated regularly. This is also
re ected in Table 1, where we detected an update on the position held property,
however updates might be not on time.
5
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>In this paper, we proposed a work ow for verifying outdated information that
makes use of KGs. We described a news analyzer that compares historical KG
information with current online KG facts. In order to use our proposal, a
up-todate KG is required. As we demonstrated in the scenario, we currently cannot
rely on past data, as it is inaccurate and di cult to compare to tting entities.
Acknowledgements. The nancial support by the Vienna Science and
Technology Fund (WWTF) grant VRG18-013 is gratefully acknowledged.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1. Entity extraction, https://dandelion.eu/semantic-text/entity-extraction-demo/, [Online; accessed 2021-
          <volume>08</volume>
          -12]
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>FAQ - DBpedia Association</surname>
          </string-name>
          , https://www.dbpedia.org/sample-page/, [Online; accessed 2021-
          <volume>08</volume>
          -11]
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abian</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guerra</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mart</surname>
            nez-Romanos,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Trillo-Lado</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Wikidata and dbpedia: a comparative study</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Semanitic Keyword-based Search on Structured Data Sources</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>142</volume>
          {
          <issue>154</issue>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Allcott</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gentzkow</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Social media and fake news in the 2016 election</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of economic perspectives 31(2)</source>
          ,
          <volume>211</volume>
          {
          <fpage>36</fpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5. Collins,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Hoang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.T.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Nguyen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.T.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Hwang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>D.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Fake news types and detection models on social media A state-of-the-art survey</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: ACIIDS (Companion)</source>
          . vol.
          <volume>1178</volume>
          , pp.
          <volume>562</volume>
          {
          <issue>573</issue>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fernandez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schneider</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Umbrich</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The dbpedia wayback machine</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: SEMANTICS</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>192</volume>
          {
          <issue>195</issue>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Meel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vishwakarma</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Fake news, rumor, information pollution in social media and web: A contemporary survey of state-of-the-arts, challenges and opportunities</article-title>
          .
          <source>Expert Syst. Appl</source>
          .
          <volume>153</volume>
          ,
          <issue>112986</issue>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mendes</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jakob</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garc</surname>
            a-Silva,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bizer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Dbpedia spotlight: shedding light on the web of documents</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: I-SEMANTICS</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>1</volume>
          {
          <issue>8</issue>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Feng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Learning to update knowledge graphs by reading news</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>2632</volume>
          {
          <issue>2641</issue>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>