<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Strategic Alignment for Digital Transformation: Insights from the Public sector</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Computer and Systems Sciences (DSV), Stockholm University Borgarfjordsgatan 8</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>SE-164 07 Kista</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="SE">Sweden</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>0000</fpage>
      <lpage>0001</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Digital transformation, a form of Information Technology (IT) enabled organisational transformation, is recognised as a phenomenon that has resulted in a business model innovation fundamentally changing how organisations operate. In the public sector, the proliferation of emerging digital technologies has brought about myriads of opportunities. The findings of empirical studies indicate that digital transformation has improved not only the efficiency of business processes but also the variety and quality of public services delivered to citizens. However, success in digital transformation is dependent on various factors. Strategic alignment-the alignment between IT and overall organisational strategy-is considered one of the essential prerequisites for digital transformation. This paper presents an ongoing study exploring the role of strategic alignment on digital transformation. Preliminary results identified various organisational and managerial factors related to strategic alignment, which are critical for digital transformation. Expected contributions and future research directions are proposed.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Business-IT Alignment</kwd>
        <kwd>Digital Transformation</kwd>
        <kwd>IT Enabled Organisational Transformation</kwd>
        <kwd>Strategic Alignment</kwd>
        <kwd>Public Organisations</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Digital transformation, defined as “technology-induced change on many levels in the
organisation that includes both the exploitation of digital technologies to improve
processes, and the exploration of digital innovation, which can transform the busines
model” [1, p. 2], is a topic currently debated among Information Systems (IS)
researchers and practitioners. Despite the emergence of new technologies and improved
business models as the result of these technologies in the business processes of today’s
organisations, digital transformation is still a concept not fully understood yet [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. The
extant literature also suggests a lack of attention on studies exploring digital
transformation in the public sector. Nevertheless, there are exponentially growing
digital transformation initiatives both in the private and public organisations [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        On the other hand, researchers argue that previous digital transformation studies
focused on the technical aspects of emerging technologies while the formulation of new
strategies is overlooked [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4">3, 4</xref>
        ]. Strategic alignment, for instance, is among the IS topics
that are not studied within the context of digital transformation. Defined as “the
application of information technology in an appropriate and timely way, in harmony
with business strategies, goals and needs” [5, p. 3], strategic alignment is considered
to be one of the important prerequisites for digital transformation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref7">6, 7</xref>
        ]. According to
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], strategic alignment in the public sector is critical to facilitate a common
understanding and shared vision among the various stakeholders resulting in the
realisation of the benefits derived from digital transformation. To contribute to the
emerging literature on digital transformation and strategic alignment, this study is set
out to explore the role of strategic alignment for digital transformation. Public
organisations are targeted in response to the calls for further studies on the relationship
between strategic alignment and digital transformation within the sector (e.g., [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8 ref9">8, 9</xref>
        ]).
Thus, the following research question is formulated to meet the objective of the study:
What is the role of strategic alignment for public organisations undertaking digital
transformation?
      </p>
      <p>The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. First, a summary of related
studies on digital transformation and strategic alignment is presented. Next, the
research methodology discusses the strategy adopted as well as the data collection and
data analysis methods. The subsequent section presents the contribution of the study
for research and practice.
2
2.1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Related Studies</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Digital Transformation in the Public Sector</title>
        <p>
          Digital transformation has become a way of improving organisational performance in
many organisations, regardless of sector and industry [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ]. In addition to academia,
private and commercial organisations, the topic has also engaged policy-makers and
elected officials in the public sector [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ]. Despite its popularity, digital transformation
is a phenomenon that is not well defined in the literature. However, a closer look into
the IS literature suggests that the various definitions of digital transformation seem to
have two themes in common. To start with, digital transformation is characterised by
the various benefits it brings to organisations. Since organisations attempt to increase
their investment in acquisitions of new digital technologies, researchers view digital
transformation as the introduction and use of emerging IT solutions to create added
value [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ]. In the public sector, digital transformation enables automatisation of work
processes, and improves efficiency which in turn increases transparency, creates new
forms of stakeholder relationships and improves service delivery, innovation, and
citizen satisfaction [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref4 ref9">4, 9, 13</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          On the other hand, IS researchers recognise digital transformation as an
organisation-wide transformation altering not only the existing business processes but
also human resource allocations, organisational structure as well as IT and business
strategies [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref14">13, 14</xref>
          ]. Wessel [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ] argues that digital transformation entails changes in the
configuration of organisations utilising the internal and external resources to meet
organisational objectives. Such characterisations cover all aspects of an organisation
(both IT and non-IT organisational changes). However, digital transformation is viewed
as a mere technology phenomenon [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ]. This lack of comprehensive oversight of
organisational factors affecting digital transformation has resulted in unrealised
benefits.
        </p>
        <p>
          Within the context of public organisations, various internal and external factors
determine the success of digital transformation. For instance, organisational culture
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ], organisational structure [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
          ], stakeholder participation [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ], and regulatory
frameworks [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ] are recognised as factors affecting the success of digital
transformation. In recent studies, digital transformation is recognised as a set of planned
and executed activities with the premise that the introduction of new technologies is
followed by appropriate adjustments to organisational resources as well as strategies.
Thus, according to [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ] and [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
          ], organisations that do not succeed to align their business
and IT strategies will have difficulty to realise the benefits from their digital
transformation initiatives.
2.2
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Strategic Alignment in the Public Sector</title>
        <p>
          Strategic alignment, commonly referred to as “business-IT alignment” remains to be
among the extensively researched areas in the IS and cognate disciplines. Given its
association with the overall organisational performance, the attention it has garnered so
far is justified. However, despite the rich volume of literature and extensive research in
the last four decades, strategic alignment in the public sector has not attracted sufficient
attention among IS researchers [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          Even though the rationale for strategic alignment, regardless of sector and industry,
is the fit between IT and business strategies which enables the realisation of
organisational goals, different contextual differences have been recognised to have
influence on the approaches taken to reach and maintain strategic alignment. For
instance, [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ] and [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ] argue that the pronounced differences between organisations in
the private and public sectors call for a closer look into strategic alignment in different
organisational settings. In comparison with organisations in the private sector, strategic
alignment is more challenging in the public organisations. Scholars attribute these
differences to the large number of stakeholders in the public sector with competing or
at times opposing interests, the wide variety of services delivered, and the complex
organisational structure whereby both political and administrative management powers
are exercised [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
          ]. Besides, assessing whether strategic alignment has created an added
public value is difficult given the intangibility of services delivered [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ]. Thus, strategic
alignment in the public sector is defined as “the degree to which the IT goals support
the strategic goals of a public agency, and to which administration and IT stakeholders
are committed to support these goals” [17, p. 834].
        </p>
        <p>
          The research model in Fig. 1 shows the conceptualisation of the study depicting the
relationship between strategic alignment and digital transformation as well as the seven
constructs. The extant literature on strategic alignment IT alignment, organisational
studies, and digital transformation (for instance, [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17 ref20">17, 20</xref>
          ]) are the foundation for the
development of the research model as well as the measurement items for each construct.
3
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Research Methodology</title>
      <p>
        This study follows both exploratory and confirmatory research approaches. The choice
of mixed research methodology (systematic literature reviews, and case studies) is to
improve the rigour of the study as recognised among researchers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
        ].
3.1
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Data Collection Method</title>
        <p>
          This study is conducted in three stages. First, two literature reviews were conducted to
establish a theoretical base and provide the state-of-the-art. The first literature review
identified 94 articles exploring strategic alignment. The aim of this review was to gain
an overview of strategic alignment studies during the digitalisation era. The second
literature review of 13 articles focused on three factors related to strategic alignment
and organisational agility in the public sector—organisational structure, organisational
culture, and stakeholder relationships. The last literature review of 29 relevant articles
explored information security management and strategic alignment. Databases
indexing premier journals and conference proceedings were searched using
combinations of keywords [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>Interviews were used to collect data in the second stage of the data collection at
multiple organisations. The first ten interviews, lasting between 60 and 85 minutes,
were conducted in one municipality. The focus here was on the relationship between
organisational structure and IT alignment. The next 17 interviews were with leaders in
four public organisations. The interviews, lasting between 85 and 110 minutes, were on
information security and organisational agility, focusing on organisational structure,
organisational culture, and stakeholder relationships. Purposive sampling strategy was
adopted to recruit informants from IT and administration divisions.</p>
        <p>Quantitative data is required for the confirmatory part of the study in the third stage.
The survey questionnaire will be formulated based on the operationalisation of the
constructs and research model. Similar public organisations where the interviews were
conducted will be targeted to distribute the questionnaire. Given the the number of
contacts we establish during the course of the study, we expect to collect about 500
complete responses. The 26 measurement items will be used to test the seven
constructs. Respondents will be asked to score according to a 7-point Likert Scales
which will be adopted for the survey questions corresponding to each of the
measurement items. The unit of analysis for the study is the public sector. Thus, the
questionnaires are formulated to assess how the various organisational and managerial
factors influence IT alignment and digital transformation in public organisations.
Before the questionnaires are distributed, a sample of experts will test it for
comprehension and clarity.
3.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Data Analysis Method</title>
        <p>
          Since the aim of the study is to explore the organisational and managerial factors that
are relevant for strategic alignment and digital transformation, thematic analysis is
chosen for the qualitative data. The rationale for this choice is that thematic analysis is
not associated with a particular epistemology or theory. Besides, thematic analysis has
been popular among IS researchers [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ]. For the literature reviews, a concept matrix was
used to thematically analyse the data, as suggested by [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>
          ]. For the analysis of the
interview data, the six-steps thematic analysis procedure by [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
          ] was followed. The
analysis of the quantitative data from the survey is the last step in the data analysis.
Partial Least Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) will be used to test the
proposed research model and hypotheses posited. PLS-SEM is one of the multivariate
data analysis methods which has gained popularity among IS researchers [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
          ]. Two
steps are involved in the analysis—the measurement model will be tested by evaluating
convergent and discriminant validity while the structural model is evaluated by
assessing the coefficients of determination (R2) and path coefficient significance [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
          ].
4
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Expected Contribution</title>
      <p>Prior IS studies indicate that strategic alignment is critical for the success of digital
transformation. Thus, it is in the best interest of researchers and practitioners to explore
the various factors affecting strategic alignment. To this end, the findings of this study
will be an addition to the scarce literature on IT management in the public sector. Given
the extensive adoption of new digital technologies in the sector, identifying the various
factors influencing strategic alignment will also provide insight to leaders with the
responsibility of managing the digital transformation in public organisations. In
addition to previous studies focusing on the technical elements of digital
transformation, the findings of this study provide an overview of organisational and
managerial factors to support public organisations as they configure their resources to
succeed in their digital transformation attempts.</p>
      <p>The mixed-research method approach chosen will also improve the rigour of the
study. Besides, by conducting a confirmatory analysis, the findings would be invaluable
for practitioners. For instance, identifying the influence of various organisational and
managerial factors on strategic alignment as well as the degree of influence will enable
the formulation of an actionable plan. On the other hand, prioritisation of scarce
resources might be possible based on the analysis of the degree of influence of the
various factors on strategic alignment.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Berghaus</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Back</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Stages in digital business transformation: Results of an empirical maturity study</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: MCIS</source>
          . p.
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Verhoef</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Broekhuizen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bart</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bhattacharya</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dong</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.Q.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fabian</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Haenlein</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Business Research</source>
          <volume>122</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>889</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>901</lpage>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luciano</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Wiedenh¨oft, G.C.:
          <article-title>The role of organizational citizenship behavior and strategic alignment in increasing the generation of public value through digital transformation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings Of The 13th International Conference On Theory And Practice Of Electronic Governance</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>494</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>501</lpage>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jonathan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Digital transformation in the public sector: Identifying critical success factors</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: 16th European</source>
          , Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern Conference,
          <string-name>
            <surname>EMCIS</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2019</year>
          , Dubai,
          <source>United Arab Emirates, December</source>
          <volume>9</volume>
          -
          <issue>10</issue>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          . pp.
          <fpage>223</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>235</lpage>
          . Springer (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luftman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Assessing business-it alignment maturity</article-title>
          .
          <source>Communications of the Association for Information Systems</source>
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>51</lpage>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Issa</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hatiboglu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bildstein</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bauernhansl</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Industrie 4.0 roadmap: Framework for digital transformation based on the concepts of capability maturity and alignment</article-title>
          .
          <source>Procedia CIRP 72</source>
          ,
          <fpage>973</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>978</lpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yeow</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hansen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R.:
          <article-title>Aligning with new digital strategy: A dynamic capabilities approach</article-title>
          .
          <source>The Journal of Strategic Information Systems</source>
          <volume>27</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>43</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>58</lpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jonathan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Watat</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Strategic alignment during digital transformation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: European, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>657</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>670</lpage>
          . Springer (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mergel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Edelmann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Haug</surname>
          </string-name>
          , N.:
          <article-title>Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews</article-title>
          .
          <source>Government information quarterly 36</source>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <volume>101385</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vial</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda</article-title>
          .
          <source>The Journal of Strategic Information Systems</source>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wessel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baiyere</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ologeanu-Taddei</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cha</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Blegind-Jensen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and it-enabled organizational transformation</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of the Association for Information Systems</source>
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>102</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>129</lpage>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kokkinakos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Markaki</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Koussouris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Psarras</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Digital transformation: is public sector following the enterprise 2.0 paradigm?</article-title>
          <source>In: International Conference on Digital Transformation and Global Society</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>96</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>105</lpage>
          . Springer (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ruud</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al.:
          <article-title>How to succeed with digital transformation projects in public sector with focus on municipalities (research in progress)</article-title>
          .
          <source>Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days</source>
          <volume>325</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>425</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>436</lpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Meyerhoff</given-names>
            <surname>Nielsen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Governance lessons from denmark's digital transformation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>456</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>461</lpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vogelsang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liere-Netheler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Packmohr</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hoppe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>A taxonomy of barriers to digital transformation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: 14th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Siegen, Germany (February 24-27</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          ). pp.
          <fpage>736</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>750</lpage>
          . Universit¨at Siegen (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jonathan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Influence of organizational structure on business-it alignment: what we do (not) know</article-title>
          . In: 17th International Conference Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR
          <year>2018</year>
          ), Stockholm, Sweden,
          <source>September 24-26</source>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          . pp.
          <fpage>375</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>386</lpage>
          . CEUR-WS. org (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Winkler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>IT governance mechanisms and administration/IT alignment in the public sector: A conceptual model and case validation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. WI 2013</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>831</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>845</lpage>
          .
          <article-title>Association for Information Systems</article-title>
          . AIS Electronic
          <string-name>
            <surname>Library (AISeL)</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jonathan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rusu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Perjons</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E.:
          <article-title>Business-it alignment in the era of digital transformation: Quo vadis?</article-title>
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>5563</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>5572</lpage>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          19.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rusu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jonathan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>It alignment in public organizations: a systematic literature review</article-title>
          .
          <source>Information Technology Governance in Public</source>
          Organizations pp.
          <fpage>27</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>57</lpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          20.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luftman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lyytinen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zvi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , T.b.:
          <article-title>Enhancing the measurement of information technology (IT) business alignment and its influence on company performance</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Information Technology</source>
          <volume>32</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>26</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>46</lpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          21.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Venkatraman</surname>
          </string-name>
          , N.:
          <article-title>IT-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition</article-title>
          .
          <source>Sloan management review 35</source>
          ,
          <fpage>73</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>73</lpage>
          (
          <year>1994</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          22.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Webster</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Watson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R.T.:
          <article-title>Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review</article-title>
          .
          <source>MIS quarterly 26</source>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ), xiii-xxiii (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          23.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Boyatzis</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R.E.:
          <article-title>Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development</article-title>
          .
          <source>sage</source>
          (
          <year>1998</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          24.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Braun</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Clarke</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>589</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>597</lpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          25.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hair</surname>
            <given-names>Jr</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.F.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Next-generation prediction metrics for composite-based pls-sem</article-title>
          .
          <source>Industrial Management &amp; Data Systems</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>