<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>IDDM-</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Kateryna Molodetskaa and Yuriy Tymonina</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Polissia National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Blvd Stary, 7, Zhytomyr, 10008</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2021</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <fpage>19</fpage>
      <lpage>21</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The study of the mechanisms of epidemic spread is an important way of controlling the disease. Reducing damage from a coronavirus epidemic is linked to the use of methods and tools for mathematical modelling of Covid-19 spread. Epidemic wave representations are used to characterize the spread of Covid-19, which is highly visual and informative. However, this "wave" representation places increased demands on Covid-19 spread models. For mathematical modelling of the spread of the Covid-19 epidemic, is considered the application of specific Covid-19 propagation functions, based on constrained growth functions. The Covid-19 spread functions show high accuracy in approximating statistical data, which demonstrates the good adequacy of these functions in principle. Application of the Covid-19 propagation functions makes it possible to quantitatively describe the basic concepts of the epidemic and conduct a comparative parametric analysis of the epidemic's spread and predict the development of the epidemic. Comparison of parameter values makes it possible to identify differences in indicators and growth rates, based on which the results of epidemic control can be assessed. Covid-19 spread functions, approximation of Covid-19 statistical evidence, parametric</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>analysis</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Mathematical modelling of epidemic spread makes an important contribution to disease control.
Modelling the mechanisms of epidemic spread and predicting its evolution can significantly reduce the
damage caused by a pandemic [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2 ref3 ref4 ref5">1-5</xref>
        ]. Quantitative model simulations can provide comparative analysis
and predictive modelling of temporal descriptions of key epidemic categories such as the number of
people who became ill, recovered and died [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6-9</xref>
        ]. Covid-19 propagation models are therefore subject to
increasing demands, not only for consistency with statistical data but also for the adequacy and accuracy
of the underlying concept descriptions.
      </p>
      <p>As we know from [10-11], the SIR model developed by Kermack and McKendrick in 1927-1933 is
widely used to describe epidemics, which is based on a scheme of epidemic transition of basic variables
from one category to another. The variables used as basic variables are those that denote the number of
individuals: those susceptible (S) become infected (I), then recover (R). The SIR model is represented
by a system of 1st order coupled differential equations that describe the time dependence of the
underlying concepts, where the coupling is given by conditions that stipulate the sum of the variables
and their derivatives.</p>
      <p>Models which implement the concept of epidemic transition have gained wide popularity and
development, so the SIR class of models today also contains varieties: SIRS, SEIR, SIS, MSEIR, etc.
However, the experience of applying SIR class models for mathematical modelling of Covid-19 spread
[10, 12-15] has shown insufficient consistency of the calculations of basic variables with statistical data.</p>
      <p>2021 Copyright for this paper by its authors.</p>
      <p>The desk review [15] noted that “An attempt to apply these models (SIR class) to the case of a
coronavirus pandemic in Ukraine showed that they fail when heterogeneous populations, different
routes of transmission and the presence of randomization factors are present”. Therefore, the project
team concluded that any projections derived for Ukraine, with its characteristic heterogeneity, using
SIR models and their derivatives cannot be considered correct and certain coincidences of projected
data may have a random nature. Therefore, the team of the “FORSAIT COVID-19” project applied a
group of methods of different nature and class to conduct a series of studies of the coronavirus
propagation process in Ukraine, based on the consideration that if the results obtained using different
methods are close, the plausibility of the studies is increased.</p>
      <p>Thus, the problem with mathematical modelling of the spread of Covid-19 is the lack of adequacy
of SIR models, preventing the accuracy of description, analysis and prediction. The fundamental
shortcoming of SIR models, in our opinion, is that in the epidemic transition concept, the dynamics of
the main variables (ill  , recovered  ) are defined through the concept of “contact”, which is defined by
the product of the variables. This representation of the interaction of variables severely limits the
modelling capability of the epidemic. The lack of accuracy of SIR models necessitates new approaches
for mathematical modelling of Covid-19 spread. New approaches that can improve the adequacy consist
of having models of the underlying concepts formed as independent constructs.</p>
      <p>The nature of the statistics of the Covid-19 coronavirus epidemic shows that they are highly like
logistic functions. Therefore, we note the application of logistic functions to approximate a piece of
given statistical information. A mathematical model of the spread of the Covid-19 coronavirus epidemic
is considered in [16], which uses a simplified logistic model of the form describing the growth in the
number of cases. However, the application of this logistic equation has shown that this model is of low
accuracy. To improve the accuracy, it is suggested that the study range should be divided into regions
with partial logistic functions, which cause significant computational difficulties.</p>
      <p>In the article [17], the authors note: “Having realised the complexity of the forecasting task, the
authors decided to restrict themselves to the simplest logistic model”. The low accuracy of the
calculation results obtained in [16, 17] can be attributed to the fact that simplified representations of
logistics models were used for modelling.</p>
      <p>The article [18] considers the wave structure of an epidemic, which is represented by a set of
elementary epidemic flows (waves) shifted along the time axis and differing in parameter values. A
constrained growth function based on a generalized logistic model with extended description
capabilities due to additional conditions were used for mathematical modelling of Covid-19
propagation. Based on this model, an analytical description of the epidemic in the form of a complex
flow of epidemic events was obtained, which can be seen as a solution to an approximation problem for
a piece of given statistical information. However, the content of the article is limited to the
approximation task for statistical information describing the flow of events. Since the generalized
logistic model in mathematical modelling of epidemic event fluxes has shown increased adequacy and
a high degree of compliance of the calculations with the original statistical data, it seems appropriate to
apply this model to modelling epidemic propagation functions.</p>
      <p>This article aims to develop mathematical models of epidemics in the form of basic event
propagation functions for key epidemic concepts based on a generalised logistic function and to use
these models for analysis and forecasting.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2. Mathematical models of epidemic spread</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>2.1. Non-linear differential equations of epidemic spread</title>
      <p>Review the following basic concepts of the Covid-19 epidemic. Statistics use the following basic
categories to refer to the spread of an epidemic:
1. The number of individuals who became ill (infected).</p>
      <p>2. The number of individuals who died (deaths).</p>
      <p>The statistics by category are set on an accumulative basis, where intermediate totals are used to
show the total amount of data as it grows over time. By modelling Covid-19 prevalence statistics using
regression relationships, we obtain a representation of the epidemic prevalence functions, which have
the following properties</p>
      <p>2
• the functions are monotonically increasing;
• the growth of the functions is limited to a certain value (threshold, plateau) to which the
function tends asymptotically.</p>
      <p>Thus, the epidemic spread functions are S-shaped logistic curves. Therefore, to describe the
epidemic spread functions, we will use the constrained growth functions that have proved themselves
in conflict interaction models [18-21]. In general, constrained growth functions are defined in
algorithmic form as solutions to a 2-nd order nonlinear differential equation [18, 19]:
• for the number of infected individuals  ( )
 2 ( )  ( ) (1a)
+ (1 +  1 ( ))</p>
      <p>+ ( 0 ( ) −  ) ( ) = 0;
+ (1 +  1 ( ))</p>
      <p>+ ( 0 ( ) −  ) ( ) = 0,
 2 
where  ( ),  ( ) are epidemic variables;  ,  – growth rates;{ 2;  1;  0}, { 2;  1;  0} –
phenomenological coefficients, which are treated as epidemic parameters.</p>
      <p>Since the epidemic spread functions are monotonically increasing, to represent them we restrict
ourselves to a 1st order nonlinear differential equation at  2 ≈ 0,  2 ≈ 0:
• for infected individuals</p>
      <p>( )  0 ( ) −  (2a)
 2 ( )
 2 ( )
•



( )
+
+
1 +  1 ( )
 0 ( ) − 
1 +  1 ( )
 ( ) = 0;
 ( ) = 0,
(1b)
(2b)
(3a)
(3b)</p>
      <p>Expressions (3a) and (3b) for equivalent growth rates describe an important property of epidemic
spread functions, namely that equivalent growth rates are not a constant but a function of primary
variables.</p>
      <p>The epidemic spread functions vary over a range bounded by equilibrium states. A final steady-state
equilibrium corresponds to the conditions that the derivatives  ( ) ≈ 0,  ( ) ≈ 0 and expressions for
 
the coefficients of the equivalent growth rates  ̃ ≈ 0 and  ̃ ≈ 0, are zero.</p>
      <p>Equations (2a) and (2b) can be considered as a generalised representation of the Verhulst logistic
equation [22-25], to which equations (2a) and (2b) can be reduced with the parameters  1 = 1 and
 2 = 1.</p>
      <p>2.2.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Functions of the spread of the Covid-19 epidemic</title>
      <p>Solutions to equations (2a) and (2b) specify the epidemic spread functions in the form of constrained
growth functions, which are used to describe the spread of Covid-19. The epidemic propagation
functions  ( ) =  ( ,  ,  0,  1),  ( ) =  ( ,  ,  0,  1) have two equilibrium states:
1. Initial equilibrium – unstable,  (0) when  = 0;
2. Final equilibrium – stable,  ( ) →  when  → ∞.</p>
      <p>A characteristic element of the epidemic propagation functions are expressions for the equivalent
growth rate coefficients:
• for infected individuals
•
for fatal cases
 ̃ ( ) =
 ̃( ) =
 −  0 ( )
1 +  1 ( )
 −  0 ( )
1 +  1 ( )
;
;
for infected individuals
growth rate value of  ̃(0) =  , when  = 0, to zero  ̃(0) →∞ ≈ 0 when  → ∞.</p>
      <p>2.3.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Discrete Covid-19 spreading function</title>
      <p>Let us use the Covid-19 spreading function representations as to the solutions to equations (2) for a
1+ 1 
for fatal cases
discrete-time as our computational expressions:</p>
      <p>for infected individuals
where  ̃(  ) =
 − 0  – equivalent growth rate coefficient.</p>
      <p>+1 = (1 +  ̃(  ))  ;
  +1 = (1 +  ̃(  )) 
where  ̃(  ) =
1+ 1 
 − 0  – the equivalent rate of increase in fatalities.
in the range from  ̃ (0) =  ,  = 0, to zero  ̃ (  ) = 0,  → ∞.</p>
      <p>The equivalent growth rate of infected cases  ̃ (  ) varies in the range from  ̃ (0) =  ,  = 0 to
zero  ̃ (  ) = 0,  → ∞. Correspondingly, the equivalent growth rate of lethal cases  ̃ (  ) varies</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>3. Calculations of Covid-19 spreading functions for different countries 3.1.</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Approximation of Covid-19 distribution statistics in different countries</title>
      <p>Equations (6a) and (6b) were used to approximate the statistical data for the spread of Covid-19 in
different countries. Actual data from the first wave of Covid-19 spread in the first half of 2020, which
has no epidemic prehistory, are used as input data.</p>
      <p>The countries selected for the calculation of the Covid-19 spreading functions are Ukraine [26], Italy
[27], Spain [28] and France [29]. The definition of Covid-19 propagation functions consists in selecting
parameters for expressions (6a)–(6b):
•</p>
      <p>,  1,  0 – for the propagation function of infected individuals;
•  ,  1,  0 – for the distribution function of lethal cases.
calculated according to the formula
where  ̅ – statistical data values.
the epidemic, the relative indicator was used 
For the selected countries, the MAPE values show a reasonably high approximation accuracy (Table 1).
Italy
2,4%,
calculated Covid-19 spread functions correspond to statistical data.
data for Ukraine for April and May 2020
for Ukraine for April and May 2020</p>
      <p>Figures 1 and 2 clearly show a reasonably good correlation between the calculated and actual data,
where the MAPE does not exceed 3% and 7%.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>Parametric analysis of Covid-19 spreading functions</title>
      <p>The Covid-19 spreading functions in the different case studies share a common, universal
mathematical design and differ in parameter values, which allows for a comparative parametric analysis
of the spread of Covid-19. The parameter values for comparative analysis of the spread of Covid-19 in
different countries are shown in Table 2.
For Italy, France and Spain, the phenomenological coefficients  1 are in the range of
 1 ∙ 10−6 ∈ {15; 17},  0 ≈ 10−6 and
differ slightly. In</p>
      <p>Ukraine, the coefficient

 0
that Ukraine has a high resistance to the epidemic.
 1 ≈ 230 ∙ 10−6 is about 15 times larger than in the other countries. Given that the
coefficient  1 describes the inhibition effect of the Covid-19 spread, it can be concluded
For Ukraine, the coefficient values  0 ≈ 4,76 ∙ 10−6 are almost 5 times higher than in the
other countries. Given that  =</p>
      <p>, the consequence is that the threshold (plateau)  of the
incidence curve decreases by a factor of almost 5 compared to other countries.</p>
      <p>0
The values of the indicators for the growth of the deceased  , are in the range of
 ∈ {0,15; 0,47} and vary considerably. The value for Ukraine is three times lower than
that for France.
countries, which indicates a high resistance to lethal cases;
the values of the phenomenological coefficients for Italy, Spain and France are
approximately the same  1 ≈ 220 ∙ 10−6,  0 ≈ 9,32 ∙ 10−6. For Ukraine, the value of the
phenomenological coefficient  1 ≈ 4600 ∙ 10−6 is 20 times higher than in the other
for Ukraine the coefficient value  0 ≈ 105 ∙ 10−6 is 10 times those of other countries. Given
that  =</p>
      <p>, the consequence is that the threshold (plateau)  of the morbidity curve has
been reduced by a factor of almost 20 compared to other countries.</p>
      <p>The integral characteristic of an epidemic, defined as the ratio of deaths to cases 
times smaller than in other countries.</p>
      <p>As the values of the indicators can be linked primarily to prevention, sanitation, and treatment
interventions, they can be used to assess the results of controlling the epidemic in different countries.
The strategy for controlling the epidemic in terms of Covid-19 spread models is generic and consists of
lowering the threshold (plateau) of the disease as much as possible (model parameters  ,  ). This
requires:
1. Decreasing the epidemic's growth rate (model parameters  ,  ).</p>
      <p>=  , is several
2. Increasing resistance to the virus (model parameters  1,  1).
3. Reducing the range of the community of people accessible to infection (increase model
parameters  0,  0).</p>
      <p>Interpretation of these formal requirements is followed by known protective actions.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>4. Conclusions</title>
      <p>The epidemic spread models considered are fundamentally different from SIR models in the
following respects:
• SIR class models investigate the behaviour of epidemic categories depending on the
interaction between them, which is consistent with the principles of system dynamics.
Representing SIR models as a coupled set of differential category equations limits the
accuracy of the calculations.
• The epidemic spreading model examines the behaviour of epidemic categories as
decentralised agents and how this behaviour determines the behaviour of the system, so the
model is based on an unrelated set of differential category equations. This approach is
consistent with agent-based modelling methodology, which has greater descriptive power
than SIR models but requires a more detailed description of the epidemic categories.
Agentbased models use a dynamic system representation in which the details of the descriptions
are provided by feedbacks</p>
      <p>The application of Covid-19 propagation functions based on the generalised logistic function shows
a high approximation accuracy of the statistical data, which demonstrates the good adequacy of these
functions. This correspondence with the original evidence suggests that the main problem of
mathematical modelling of Covid-19 propagation, which boils down to the adequacy of epidemic
models, can be solved by applying Covid-19 spreading models and functions.</p>
      <p>The application of Covid-19 propagation functions makes it possible not only to quantitatively
describe the basic concepts of the epidemic but also to construct a reliable forecast, provided that the
parameters are constant. An even more important, in our opinion, the consequence of the application of
Covid-19 propagation functions is a comparative parametric analysis of specific epidemic spread
functions. Comparison of parameter values can reveal differences in growth rates and
phenomenological coefficients, from which conclusions can be drawn about different processes of
epidemic behaviour in different regions and countries. By linking these processes to prevention,
sanitation and treatment interventions, differences in the results of the epidemic can be identified,
analysed and good practices can be disseminated. In general, the application of Covid-19 spread
functions can help to reduce the harm caused by a pandemic.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>5. References</title>
      <p>[7] H. Huang, Y. Chen, and Y. Ma. Modeling the competitive diffusions of rumor and knowledge
and the impacts on epidemic spreading. Applied Mathematics and Computation 388 (2021) 125536.
doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125536.
[8] S. Chen, et al. Buying time for an effective epidemic response: The impact of a public holiday
for outbreak control on COVID-19 epidemic spread. Engineering (2020) doi:
10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.018.
[9] D. Han, et al. How the individuals’ risk aversion affect the epidemic spreading. Applied
Mathematics and Computation 369 (2020) 124894. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.124894.
[10] H. Weiss, The SIR model and the Foundations of Public Health. MATerials MATemàtics 2013
(3) (2013) 1–17.
[11] A. Comunian, R. Gaburro, and M. Giudici. Inversion of a SIR-based model: A critical analysis
about the application to COVID-19 epidemic. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 413 (2020) 132674.
doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2020.132674.
[12] A. Matveev. Mathematical modelling to assess the effectiveness of measures against the spread
of the COVID-19 epidemic. Journal: National Security and Strategic Planning 1(29) (2020).
[13] E. Fontes. COMSOL Multiphysics simulations of COVID-19 virus propagation. URL:
https://www.comsol.ru/blogs/modeling-the-spread-of-covid-19-with-comsol-multiphysics/, 2021.
[14] How maths helps fight epidemics, 2019. URL:
https://nplus1.ru/material/2019/12/26/epidemicmath.
[15] Foresight Covid-19: moving into the fading phase of the coronavirus pandemic, 2020. URL:
http://wdc.org.ua/uk/covid19-attenuation.
[16] E. Koltsova, E. Kurkina, and A. Vassetsky. Mathematical modelling of the COVID-19
coronavirus epidemic in Moscow. Computational nanotechnology 7(1) (2020) 99-105.
[17] D. A. Kovrigin, and S. P. Nikitenkova. Predictive monitoring of the second waves of the
COVID-19 epidemic in Iran, Russia and other countries. Vestnik RGMU 4 (2020) 27-33.
[18] Molodetska, , Tymonin, Y. Mathematical modeling COVID-19 wave structure of distribution.
In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2753 (2020) 292–301. URL:
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol2753/paper21.pdf
[19] K. Molodetska, Y. Tymonin, and I. Melnychuk. The conceptual model of information
confrontation of virtual communities in social networking services. International Journal of Electrical
and Computer Engineering (IJECE) 10(1) (2020) 1043-1052. doi: 10.11591/ijece.v10i1.pp1043-1052.
[20] K. Molodetska, and Y. Tymonin. System-dynamic models of destructive informational
influence in social networking services. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital
Industry 3(2) (2019) 137-146.
[21] R. Hryshchuk, K. Molodetska, and Y. Tymonin. Modelling of conflict interaction of virtual
communities in social networking services on an example of anti-vaccination movement. In: Int.
Workshop on Conflict Management in Global Information Networks 2588 (2020) 250-264. URL:
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2588/paper21.pdf
[22] E. Postnikov. Estimation of COVID-19 dynamics “on a back-of-envelope”: Does the simplest
SIR model provide quantitative parameters and predictions? Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals 135 (2020)
109841. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109841.
[23] A. Abusam, R. Abusam, and B. Al-Anzi. Adequacy of Logistic models for describing the
dynamics of COVID-19 pandemic. Infectious Disease Modelling 5 (2020) 536-542. doi:
10.1016/j.idm.2020.08.006
[24] B. Zeng, M. Tong and X. Ma. A new-structure grey Verhulst model: Development and
performance comparison. Applied Mathematical Modelling 81 (2020) 522-537. doi:
10.1016/j.apm.2020.01.014
[25] M. Rudolph-Lilith, and L. Muller. On a representation of the Verhulst logistic map. Discrete
Mathematics 324 (2014) 19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.disc.2014.01.018
[26] Distribution COVID-19 in Ukraine (2021). URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/
[27] Distribution COVID-19 in Italy (2021). URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/.
[28] Distribution COVID-19 in Spain (2021). URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/.
[29] Distribution COVID-19 in France (2021). URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Y. Zhang.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Epidemic spreading of evolving community structure</article-title>
          .
          <source>Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals</source>
          <volume>140</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>110101</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.chaos.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>110101</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Xie</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>Spatial and temporal differentiation of COVID-19 epidemic spread in mainland China and its influencing factors</article-title>
          .
          <source>Science of The Total Environment</source>
          <volume>744</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>140929</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.scitotenv.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>140929</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Hu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>First, second and potential third generation spreads of the COVID-19 epidemic in mainland China: an early exploratory study incorporating location-based service data of mobile devices</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Infectious Diseases</source>
          <volume>96</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>489</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>495</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.ijid.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>05</volume>
          .048.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Hu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Traffic-driven epidemic spreading dynamics with heterogeneous infection rates</article-title>
          .
          <source>Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals</source>
          <volume>132</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>109577</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.chaos.
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <volume>109577</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Coll</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Sánchez</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Epidemic spreading by indirect transmission in a compartmental farm</article-title>
          .
          <source>Applied Mathematics and Computation</source>
          <volume>386</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>125473</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.amc.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>125473</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Wu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>Impact of inter-layer hopping on epidemic spreading in a multilayer network</article-title>
          .
          <source>Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation</source>
          <volume>90</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>105403</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.cnsns.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>105403</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>