<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>General Data Protection Law: Observations and Analysis of the Compliance Level of Organizations</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Matheus Lustosa de Souza Louzeiro</string-name>
          <email>matheuslustosa96@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Renato José da Silva Camões</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vanessa Coelho Ribeiro</string-name>
          <email>vanessa.ribeiro@redes.unb.br</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Edna Dias Canedo</string-name>
          <email>ednacanedo@unb.br</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Fábio Lúcio Lopes Mendonça</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Rafael T. de Sousa Jr</string-name>
          <email>desousa@unb.br</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University Center Uniprojeção</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Brasília</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="BR">Brazil</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>325</fpage>
      <lpage>329</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This article addresses the scenario of the impact of the Brazilian General Data Protection Law (LGPD) on organizations. For the research used a publication of the Federal Data Processing Service (SERPRO) in 2018, and the authors sent a survey with 14 questions related to the requirements established by the LGPD for companies. It was possible to interview, in 20 days, a total of 52 people who work both in the public service and in the private sector in organizations of different sizes. The study showed that the vast majority of companies have not yet fully adapted, even with the long period that lasted between the approval of the law and its entry into force, and that they need changes to meet the requirements proposed by the LGPD, whether in the area of security data, in the management of privacy, or in the processing of data of their holders, who may be natural or legal persons who in some way are also related to an individual.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Brazilian General Data Protection Law</kwd>
        <kwd>Compliance</kwd>
        <kwd>Federal Data Processing Service</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The issue related to the protection of personal data began to be addressed in Brazil about 8 years
ago, which established rules for the treatment of personal data of Brazilians, which public agencies
and companies would have to follow. This bill, together with two others, were fundamental for the
preparation of law, which was approved by the National Congress, was sanctioned by the
Presidency of the Republic in 2018. With that, it is observed that, during the last decade, several
political and economic factors contributed to the emergence of a General Data Protection Law,
among which we can mention the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet, the Espionage
CPI and the General Regulation European Union Data Protection Act (GDPR) which came into force
in May 2018. Law No. 13,709 better known as LGPD was enacted in Brazil in Au
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">gust 2020</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>Therefore, it is in this sense that the problems to be studied are found. This work addresses the
aspects of the LGPD that impact organizations through a case study. For this purpose, a survey was
carried out on how these organizations are prepared for this new scenario, through a questionnaire
released by SERPRO and applied by researchers in companies, making it possible to carry out a
subjective analysis of the organizations' adherence to the LGPD.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Research Results and Analysis</title>
      <p>According to the chosen methodology, this section intends to analyze the collected data and present
the results of the applied research through the questionnaire made available by SERPRO about the
LGPD. The Questionnaire composed of 14 questions was created on the Google Forms platform,
being available to be answered for a period of 20 days. In this period the link generated by the
platform was shared through tools and applications such as e-mails, WhatsApp, LinkedIn and other
social networks, which made it possible to select people who work in both the public and private
sectors. Thus, it was possible to collect a total of 52 responses from the public and private sectors.</p>
      <p>Of the 14 questions applied in the questionnaire, the analysis of the results of the six most relevant
questions were selected for this poster, representing questions 3, 4, 11, 13 and 14. 34.6% of
respondents work in the public sector, which represents a total of 18 responses. Regarding the
private sector, the percentage is equal to 65.4%, which represents a total of 34 responses. Although
the percentage of organizations interviewed in the public sector are smaller, the public sector has a
larger number of employees, according to the observation in the results collected in question 2 of the
questionnaire.</p>
      <p>Figure 1, it can be seen from the responses collected that 59.6% of the interviewees assigned scores
from 5 to 8, where most of them refer to companies in the private sector and in large part are
companies that have a range of employees from 1000 to 5000 employees. It is noticed that these have
a reasonable score in relation to the LGPD implementation initiatives. Already 21.2% of the
companies received relatively low marks, composing the ranges of 0 to 2, and 3 to 4. In these two
ranges of grades ranging from 0 to 4 points, only 3 organizations are in the public sector, these being
composed of between 500 and 5000 employees. In the private sector, 8 organizations also received
grades from 0 to 4 points, these having between 50 and 5000 employees.</p>
      <p>Question 4 sought to show the percentage of respondents who are involved in this process of
adapting to the General Data Protection Law. According to the results obtained, it was possible to
observe that 48.1% of the interviewees are involved or participate in some way in the
implementation of technologies and innovations caused by the LGPD. Analyzing in parallel with
the responses collected and presented in question 2, it was observed that 7 interviewees or 38.8% of
the interviewees who work in the public sector are involved with the implementation of technologies
due to LGPD, in the private sector the percentage is 52.9% of those involved.</p>
      <p>Table 1 shows the results obtained in relation to the marks given by the interviewees on the
initiatives to implement the LGPD in the organizations in which they operate. In the same table, it
can be said that the organizations that received scores from 0 to 4 have not yet been clearly revealed
to the interviewees, that the organization is presenting initiatives to implement the LGPD. It can be
deduced that the organizations that received scores from 5 to 8, in the view of the interviewees, have
already started to give signs that they are looking to implement an LGPD compliance plan. The
companies that received scores from 9 to 10 clearly express to the interviewees that the actions and
measures to implement a data privacy program are already underway, seeking to meet the
requirements demanded by the LGPD.</p>
      <p>The question 11 sought to verify whether organizations have documentation and practices related
to the management of information privacy, according to the data collected, it was possible to verify
that 32.69% of the companies interviewed so far have not dealt with this issue with great concern,
since the other 67.31% who answered the questionnaire, declared that they already have
documentation and practices related to the management of information privacy, but that they need
to update the documentation and practices to adapt them to the new law. As for 32% of respondents,
they are late to start implementing the law in terms of knowing the data of the organization and its
public.</p>
      <p>According question 13, it is noticeable that 38.46% of the interviewed companies apply, in a
certain way, actions regarding the privacy of users' data, and 61.5% still need to start training and
guidance in addition to investing in the information structure. data security, which directly and
indirectly impacts the performance of the professionals who process the company's data. In question
14 for the applied research, 69.23% of the interviewees declared that their companies have
prevention and / or minimization management of security flaws that cause data leakage.</p>
      <p>Most public sector organizations were at low risk, only 7.69% were at high risk, that is, they have
good compliance with the LGPD, requiring only adjustments to meet the requirements of the
General Data Protection Law. Therefore, 28.57% of the interviewed companies in the private sector
showed low compliance with the LGPD, and it is necessary for these organizations to rethink their
processes, technologies and cultures in order to adapt to the scenario that the General Data
Protection Law proposes.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Conclusion</title>
      <p>It was found in this research that most of the organizations interviewed, in a way know how to
distinguish what is personal data and that some of them are subject to specific care such as sensitive
data, and that these must be treated with the consent of the holder with the due legal justification.</p>
      <p>
        In view of the aspects mentioned, it is concluded that through this research it was possible to
observe that most of the organizations interviewed are already taking actions, measures and
reviewing their processes to reach the level of adequacy sufficient to comply with the LGPD,
however, there are still a large number of companies that fall short of compliance with the LGPD,
which may be more likely to leak data and incorrect treatment of user information, which can have
bad consequences for organizations and holders of data. data, since there was a long period from
the approval of the L
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">GPD in 2018</xref>
        until the be
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">ginning of its 2020</xref>
        term, enough time to implement a
data privacy plan.
      </p>
      <p>
        SERPRO: Preparada para a lgpd? https://www.serpro.gov.br/lgpd/empresa/esta-preparada-para-lgpd21.
SERPRO: Dados públicos, se
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">gundo a lgpd (2018</xref>
        ),
https://www.serpro.gov.br/lgpd/menu/protecao-dedados/dados-publicos-lgpd22.
      </p>
      <p>About the Authors
Matheus Lustosa de Souza Louzeiro
Graduated in Information Systems from UniProjeção University Center, Brazil, in 2020. He is currently an
Educational Management Technician - Technical Support. His current research interests include cloud
computing, LGPD and information security.</p>
      <p>Renato José da Silva Camões
He holds a master's degree in ICT Management from the Catholic University of Brasília in 2010. Graduated
in Computer Science from Faculdade Integrada do Planalto Central, Brazil, in 2001. He is currently a
Professor at the School of Technology at UniProjeção University Center. His current research interests
include computer history, cloud computing, hyperconvergence, information security and artificial
intelligence.</p>
      <p>Vanessa Coelho Ribeiro
Edna Dias Canedo
Graduated in Computer Science from the Catholic University of Brasília(2000), master's in Information
Science from the University of Brasília (2007), coordinator of IT courses at the UniProjeção University
Center, Professor of Information Technology and researcher in a cooperation project between the Latitude
Laboratory - UnB and Administrative Council for Economic Defense - CADE.</p>
      <p>Received the master’s degree in software systems from the Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG),
in 2002, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Brasília (UnB), Brazil, in 2012.
She is currently an Assistant Professor (tenure track) with the Computer Science Department, UnB. Her
current research interests include software engineering, cloud computing, informatics in education, and
software systems.</p>
      <p>Fábio Lúcio Lopes Mendonça
Doctorate in Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications from the University of Brasília (2019), Master's
in Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications from the University of Brasília (2008), postgraduate in
Project Management from the Estácio Brasília University Center (2018), graduated in Data Processing from
the Catholic University of Brasília (2004). He is an Adjunct Professor at the Department of Electrical
Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University of Brasília - UnB, University Professor at Centro Universitário
Projeção and Project Manager at the Decision Making Technology Laboratory - LATITUDE.
Rafael Timóteo de Sousa Jr.</p>
      <p>Graduated in electrical engineering from the Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), Campina Grande, Brazil,
in 1984, and received the Ph.D. degree in telecommunications from the University of Rennes, France, in
1988. He is currently a Network Engineering Professor with the Electrical Engineering Department, University
of Brasília (UnB), Brazil. He is the Coordinator of the Professional Postgraduate Program on Electrical
Engineering (PPEE) and supervises the Decision Technologies Laboratory (LATITUDE), UnB. He has developed
research in information and network security, intrusion, and fraud detection.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bernardes</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>B</article-title>
          .,
          <string-name>
            <surname>de Andrade</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Novais</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Data protection in public sector: Nor-mative analysis of portuguese and brazilian legalorders</article-title>
          .
          <source>InWorld Conference on Information Systemsand Technologies</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>807</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>817</lpage>
          . Springer.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Carauta</given-names>
            <surname>Ribeiro</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>R.</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Dias</given-names>
            <surname>Canedo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>E.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Us-ing mcda for selecting criteria of lgpd compliantpersonal data security</article-title>
          .
          <source>InThe 21st Annual Interna-tional Conference on Digital Government Research</source>
          ,dg.o '
          <volume>20</volume>
          , page 175-
          <fpage>184</fpage>
          , New York, NY, USA.Association for Computing Machinery.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>G.</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>Informações valiosas: o que podemos levar para outras empresas? administradores</article-title>
          .
          <source>OM2018</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ), https://administradores.com.br/noticias/informacoes-valiosas
          <article-title>-o-que-podemos-levar-para-outrasempresas.</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Heeks</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Implementing and Managing eGovernment</article-title>
          . London: Sage Publications.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ramiro</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A..</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Proteção de dados pessoais no Brasil e no Chile: uma análise comparativa sob a perspectiva da decisão de adequação da Comissão Europeia</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>