=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-3057/paper5.pdf |storemode=property |title=Open Educational Environment as a Condition for the Development of Modern Online Learning |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3057/paper5.pdf |volume=Vol-3057 |authors=Ekaterina A. Kameneva,Galina V. Mozhaeva,Tatyana A. Chekalina }} ==Open Educational Environment as a Condition for the Development of Modern Online Learning== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3057/paper5.pdf
Open Educational Environment as a Condition for the
Development of Modern Online Learning
Ekaterina A. Kameneva 1, Galina V. Mozhaeva 2, Tatyana A. Chekalina 2
1
  Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Leningradsky prospect, 49/2, Moscow,
125167, Russia
2
  Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Oleko Dundich street, 23, Moscow,
121096, Russia

                Abstract
                Scientists from all over the world have been dealing with the problems of developing an open
                educational environment for a long time. The current critical situation due to the mass
                transformation to distance learning has certainly influenced the process of creating or updating
                universities’ open educational environments. However, the education system tends to develop
                online learning, increase online bachelor's and master's degree programs, training programs,
                etc. Consequently, it becomes obvious that modern online learning should be implemented
                under specific conditions, thereby creating a unique open online educational environment. It is
                very important to solve the problem of organizing qualitative online learning when developing
                such an environment. This is facilitated by the use of the latest digital and pedagogical
                technologies, for example, business simulators. One of the tools for assessing the quality of
                online education is educational data analytics. This also helps to increase the motivation of
                students to study in an online environment, stimulate teachers to create qualitative content, etc.
                When developing an online environment, particular attention should be given to the work with
                teachers aimed at upgrading the level of digital competencies, mastering modern tools for
                organizing training sessions in an online environment, etc. Methods of both formal and non-
                formal education can be used in this case: training courses, webinars, the establishment of
                professional communities in social networks, etc. This article presents the experience of the
                Financial university in developing an open educational environment. The purpose of the study
                was to analyze different cases of conducting students’ educational events. The authors also
                include recommendations for organizing qualitative online learning.

                Keywords 1
                Open educational environment, online learning, event pedagogy, simulators, LMS Moodle.

1. Introduction
    Currently, there is a consistent expansion of ideas about the territory where educational processes
unfold: from a specific, limited by physical boundaries (walls) of the place where they teach and study,
to a global open information and educational environment of the modern world. This has become
especially noticeable when the global pandemic caused the mass transition to distance learning.
    The term of an open educational environment is considered today as a global background for
intercultural interaction and free movement of the participants of the educational process. Also with the
diversity of the quality of the national and regional educational environment, there is a widespread
movement towards such general characteristics as openness, diversity, inclusiveness, multileveled, poly
structure [11].
    The development of open education is due to some reasons:


    Proceedings of VI International Scientific and Practical Conference Distance Learning Technologies (DLT–2021), September 20-22,
2021, Yalta, Crimea
EMAIL: eakameneva@fa.ru (A. 1); gvmozhaeva@fa.ru (A. 2); tachekalina@fa.ru (A. 3)
ORCID: 0000-0001-9909-6986 (A. 1); 0000-0002-6500-9327 (A. 2); 0000-0002-2179-0326 (A. 3)
             ©️ 2021 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
             Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
             CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)



                                                                                   46
        transformation of the whole education system associated with the digitalization of society;
        the opportunity to get an education for young people who, for various reasons, are unable to
    participate in face-to-face learning;
        obtaining additional professional education by specialists of any age [7].
    The problems of “open education” abroad began to be actively engaged in the last third of the XX
century, and in the Post-Soviet space at the beginning of 2000.
    From a methodological point of view, researchers of the problem of open education have different
positions: some take a personality-oriented approach as a basis and consider open education in the
context of a humanistic paradigm; others associate a new educational paradigm with cultural and
axiological approaches; still others take the methodology of synergy as a basis, consider education as
an open, creative process that promotes the teacher's free choice of forms and methods of teaching, and
students – an individual educational trajectory, in the process of mastering which there is an open
dialogue and cooperation with the educator.
    In the educational-methodical and pedagogical literature, the terms “open education” and “online
education (learning)” are considered by some authors as close in meaning, while others as indicating
different phenomena in education.
    V. O. Zinchenko understands the open educational environment as a system of relations between the
participants of the educational process, implemented through their interaction with various social
institutions to development of the potential of the student's personality, which implies the development
of a consciously chosen educational trajectory, the main element of which is information about the
culture of humanity [12].
    From January 2014 to June 2019, a systematic review of 245 articles on the topic of open education
was conducted in the Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus databases. The analysis included four topics:
general characteristics of publications; identification of methodological trends; identification of central
and related aspects of the topic; implemented innovative educational practices. As a result, the following
conclusions were made:
    1. Open education for all. Studies on open education published in recent years show not only
quantitative but also qualitative growth, mainly in developed countries. Open education is based on the
form of qualitative content and makes the problem of access to materials in languages other than English
obvious. An important opportunity is opening in developing countries, where this type of open
education can facilitate access to qualitative knowledge.
    2. Open education with mixed empirical data. Methodological trends, strategies, and tools
accompanying the research of open education indicate a quantitative and qualitative trend. Working
with mixed methods allows getting closer to the knowledge of complex aspects. Open education faces
the problem of a holistic and interdisciplinary understanding, which involves some changes in the
methods of researching education.
    3. Open education of co-creation and quality. The practice of open education has advanced in its
pedagogical and technological perspectives and faces problems related to the aspects of cooperation
and quality. There is a need to make academic research more accessible. Collaborative and creative
work will help the field of open education to ensure wider enrichment based on qualitative teaching
methods.
    4. Open education for innovation in the field of mobilization, integration, and diversity. The Open
education movement promotes methods of production and distribution, and it is also faced with the task
of introducing innovative methods of mobilization that affect the learning environment. The task is to
integrate open practices into education. UNESCO's recommendations call for comprehensive and
equitable access and the promotion of international cooperation [5].
    Thus, the problems caused by global crises, such as the pandemic situation due to COVID-19,
require the cooperation of all participants to create an open innovative educational environment that is
inclusive (with open resources and practices that support education for people with special needs or
disadvantaged groups of the population) and diverse (with open materials in different languages with
cultural and gender relevance).




                                                     47
2. Presentation of the Basic Material
    The development of an open educational environment in the implementation of online bachelor's
and master's degree programs has its characteristics and limitations. In this article, the authors present
the experience of the Institute of Online Education of the Financial University in developing an open
educational environment.
    Now, the situation with the pandemic has outlined a tendency to clearly distinguish between elite
and mass education. In our opinion, elite education in the future will be implemented on the campus,
using digital technologies, according to various models of mixed learning, for example, the well-known
flipped classroom or station rotation, laboratory rotation. At the same time, the key task at the campus
will be the development of the quality of education and the technologization learning process in terms
of pedagogical technologies and their integration with digital technologies. Another characteristic of
elite education will be guaranteed employment and career development and, possibly, post-program
support for working with graduates (endowment fund management). The general trend of development
will be their price rise since superprofessionals (experts) in various subject areas will be involved in the
training process [1, 10, 13].
    On the other hand, the pandemic has also demonstrated the possibility of mass education, including
higher education, through online programs, online courses, and shortening the duration of learning. In
Europe, the concept of “spontaneous learning” is widespread, that is, what we call “non-formal
education". This is self-education, which can end with certification for attestation or credit transfer.
Mass education is characterized by learning regardless of place and time 24/7, all days of the year,
which helps to reduce the cost of such programs if you have designed content or use open educational
resources. It should be mentioned that the quality of learning on online programs does not decrease.
    Let's look further at the factors that should take into consideration for developing a qualitative open
educational environment when implementing online programs.

   2.1. Student-Centered Principle

   Online learning is based on the student-centered principle, which reminds us that students are the
main subjects of educational activity and their interests, and the expected result of the activity is
fundamental (Fig. 1).




Figure 1: Model of student-centered education of the Institute of the Online Education

   The student-centered educational process can be organized in the Learning management system
(LMS) such as Moodle, which is the most used platform in Russia and the world. LMS Moodle fully
meets the requirements of federal state educational standards in terms of creating an electronic
educational environment for a university and, accordingly, provides management of all the essential
processes of educational activities.

                                                      48
   There are three main roles of the educators in the implementation of programs based on LMS
Moodle. The first role is the development of online courses in all subjects in each semester. The second
role is to accompany the learning process using online courses. The third role is a regular update of
online courses (e.g. two weeks before the start of the next semester).
   Based on LMS Moodle it is possible to create a virtual educational office, which replaces the dean's
office. It contains various information for students and educators, gives a possibility to communicate,
use corporate and personal accounts, etc.

   2.2. Open Educational Resources
   Building an effective open educational environment requires not only creating own educational
resources but also sharing them with other universities and borrow high-quality open educational
content. For this purpose, were created the Open Online Academy of the Financial University (OOA),
the Open Auditorium of the Online Academy and was opened, and access to online courses from the
world's leading universities on the Coursera platform.
   One of the aims of creating the “Open Auditorium” project of the Online Academy was to include
elements of elite education in our open educational environment. The best academicians, university
professors are invited to open classes, where students can have a chance to ask questions, receive
feedback, etc.
   Every year, the number of Russian and foreign learners in the Open Online Academy of the Financial
University keeps growing. Three models can be used to integrate our online courses into any university's
educational process: 1) complete replacement of a course with an online course; 2) replacement a part
of the course with an online course (blended learning); 3) an online course becomes an on-campus
course or elective. In addition, online courses allow you to personalized learning, develop practical
skills, increase students' learning motivation, mainly through advanced possibilities. For example, most
of our online courses have built-in dialogue simulators [3, 9].

   2.3. Educational Online Events

   In our opinion, one of the most important elements of an open educational environment is the
organization of educational online events for students. Educational online events can allow the online
student to fully experience university life. For instance, students can participate in the international
online conferences, competitions held in the official accounts of social media of the Institute or
university, online “Doors Open Day”, the “Student Atlas” project, etc. [4].
   In the case of the Financial University, there was held an inter-university online game between six
teams from four Russian universities. The even were based on the simulation "Corporate Governance"
and held within the International Scientific and Practical Student Conference "Digital Impact: Society,
Economy, Innovation".
   The simulation "Corporate Governance" is aimed to develop decision-making skills by managing a
large manufacturing company. The simulation is based on an enterprise model that includes production,
marketing, personnel management, financial management, logistics, etc. For two days of the event, all
participants came up with a strategy for the development of a virtual company, showed remote
teamwork skills, and basic management competencies.
   Those events help motivate students to study together, which is a current issue in the education
system, especially in online learning. Our experience showed the importance of online events because,
unfortunately, some students of online education programs do not feel like university students, feel
distant and isolated, and do not feel a part of the university.




                                                    49
Figure 2: The simulation "Corporate Governance"


   2.4. Simulations in the Educational Process

    Another essential element of an open educational environment is the use of simulations in the
educational process. The Financial University has accumulated sufficient experience in the creation and
application of computer simulations.
    Simulation-based learning is an alternative format for providing theoretical knowledge with the
possibility of applying it in practice and developing skills that are not always available or effective in
the context of traditional learning and even at work itself. Analysis of the literature shows that leading
foreign and Russian universities have been actively using business simulations in economic disciplines
for a long time. Applying simulations in education has been proven not only to provide knowledge in a
particular area, but also to form students’ hard and soft skills, such as analytical and critical thinking,
managerial decision-making, teamwork, and problem-solving skills.
    The application showed that despite business simulations' possibilities in online learning, educators
prefer to use them in face-to-face classes to organize discussions. However, in the spring of 2020 due
to the mass move to online learning, many universities started to use simulation in online classes [6].
    For example, at the Financial University during the pandemic, some faculties used such simulations
as: "Corporate Governance", "Endowment Fund Management", and "Introduction to Blockchain". The
Financial University's simulation "Introduction to Blockchain" is currently one of the few business
simulations which are integrated into an online course. The trend of business simulation integration to
the online course and LMS platform started after the growth of interest in online and blended learning,
especially since the 2020 pandemic (Fig. 3).
    In 2021, the Financial University also developed a simulation of future career trials that include
various enterprises with different management methods. In this simulation, students try to "seek
employment" and then "work" in various companies (banks, IT companies, insurance companies, etc.),
in different positions (e.g. financial officer, economist, accountant, manager, etc.). This simulation can
also be used within the Russian model “2 + 2 + 2”, which assumes that student from the second year of
study can change their major or field.




                                                     50
Figure 3: Computer simulator "Future career trial platform"


   2.5. Conducting Scientific Research: Training Data Analyst
    The application of modern technologies in the educational process requires a scientific justification
and, in our opinion, the basis for the organization of an open educational environment is the results of
scientific research, confirming the effectiveness of modern pedagogical and digital technologies. For
this purpose, the Laboratory of Online Learning and Data Analysis in Education was established, which
collects and analyzes educational data from LMS Moodle, studies neurotechnologies in education,
development of methodological recommendations for the integration of simulators, and simulators into
the educational process, etc.
    Let us present the results of some studies that were carried out in the 2020-2021 years.
    The development of online learning is accompanied by an increased focus on quality, which is
managed on a basis that goes beyond learner control but also learning processes, their organization, and
means used. The task of quality management is complicated by technological developments and the
need to integrate various pedagogical and digital tools into a unique e-learning environment. The advent
of PLE and MOOCs makes it difficult to ensure the quality of online learning without familiar
management tools and requires new solutions, allowing, on the one hand, individualizing learning, and
on the other hand, managing learning quality monitoring [8]. Therefore, to assess the effectiveness of
the educational process of the Institute for Online Education, a model has been developed to analyzes
the activities of teachers and students at the level of a separate e-learning course, and the system as a
whole.
    Data for analysis are extracted with multiple tools (plugins), integrated into LMS Moodle.
    1. Construction rating of the teacher activity
    Rating of the teacher activity for LMS Moodle, which is based on data and take into a number:
     courses for teachers in the system;
     students in the system;
     active students in the course;
     activities of teachers to create content and accompany students;
     activities of students to view content and execute tasks (Fig. 4-5).




                                                    51
Figure 4: Activities of teachers (bachelor’s degree programmer)




Figure 5: Activities of teachers (master's degree programmer)

    During the school year, data were uploaded twice during the first semester. As the analysis of the
data showed, the activity of teachers in bachelor’s programmers increased during the semester. Some
activities contributed to this development: advanced training courses, a series of digital workshops,
individual consulting, updating of the database of local normative documents, etc.
    2. Calculation of the index of e-learning course productivity
    The index of e-learning course productivity was calculated based on user activity data received,
which demonstrates how successful a teacher is in optimizing the process of accompanying students in
an e-learning environment and reducing labor costs. The index of e-learning course productivity shows
the effectiveness of the teacher’s use of digital and distance education technologies (Fig. 6-7).
    The data showed that by the end of the semester there had been an increase in the activity of both
teachers and students, which testified to the quality of the educational process in the digital
environment.




                                                   52
Figure 6: The index of e-learning course productivity (bachelor’s degree programmer)




Figure 7: The index of e-learning course productivity (master's degree programmer)

   3) Evaluation of the quality of e-learning courses in LMS Moodle by students
   From 12 January to 8 February 2021, students were asked to assess the quality of e-learning courses
by completing a questionnaire that was automatically built into the content of each e-learning course.
The questionnaire was involved to identify e-learning courses characteristics with low scores. Анкета
содержала вопросы с единой шкалой оценивания, сгруппированные в шесть категорий:
       training materials,
       organization of the training process,
       individualization of learning,
       communication,
       control system,
       reflex (Fig. 8).




                                                   53
Figure 8: Summary results for bachelor’s and master’s degrees

        An analysis of the results for each category showed that there were individual parameters that
received very low scores as well as those with high scores (Fig. 9).




Figure 9: Detailed data by category


                                                   54
    As can be seen from the diagram (fig. 9), the lowest score (below 50) was obtained for the following
parameters:
        Category “Training materials”:
    Cause: the formats of the course materials are non-disclosure. In e-learning courses, teachers do not
make sufficient use of interactive training materials.
        Category “Organization of the training process”:
    Cause: students are offered limited jobs that they need to perform in e-learning courses.
        Category “Individualization of learning”:
    Cause: e-learning courses have no tasks in which the teacher offers different ways of doing it. During
the development of e-learning courses, students cannot «try on» different «roles».
     Category “Communication”:
    Cause: teachers don’t use enough motivational techniques in e-learning courses for successful and
timely completion.
    The analysis of the results allows for the identification of further actions to improve e-learning
courses for their subsequent launch in the next academic year, the planning of work with teachers, aimed
at their professional development in the field of digital and online technologies, to organize work with
students on their educational motivation online environment.
    Thus, the analysis of monitoring data allows assessing the effectiveness of the implementation of
online learning as a whole, the work of individual entities (teachers, students, tutors), structural
subdivisions (Departments, Faculties), and make management decisions to optimize online learning
processes at our University.
    The monitoring system allows finding best practices of online learning at the university, to attract
successful teachers to form a mentoring system on the application of LMS Moodle tools in the
educational process.
    Results allow developing incentive mechanisms for teachers’ work with e-learning courses in LMS
Moodle, thus creating a transparent system for the evaluation of teachers’ performance in a digital
university environment with objective and measurable indicators.
    The LMS Moodle Learning Monitoring System allows not only to control the real work of students
and teachers but also to influence the results of learning, the improvement of its teaching methods, and
quality in general.

   2.6. Working with Teachers

   The creation of an open environment requires close collaboration with teachers. For this purpose,
the project “Digital Teacher’s Workshop” was organized (Digital teacher’s workshop ), which includes
online workshops, to organize online learning through various training activities, using different digital
services, technologies, the principles of organizing group work, individual project activities in the
online environment, etc. are considered.
   The project started in November 2019 and aims to support teachers in developing their digital
education environment. The project includes webinars, each of which affects distance learning and the
use of different digital tools and services in learning. The project website created “Digital Tool Box”,
which presents recommendations on the use of digital tools and services for organizing group activities,
and independent work of students. The Box is constantly updated with new instructions.
   The project is an international project, with more than 2 000 participants from more than 100 higher
education institutions, colleges, and schools from six countries: Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus,
Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, and Moldova.
   The project “Digital Teacher’s Workshop” is very popular among teachers. During the pandemic, it
proved to be a good tool in the transition to distance learning and helped project participants to learn
many new digital tools that enabled them to achieve pedagogical goals. Since participating in the
project’s webinars, many teachers have become active in the use of digital technologies in their
pedagogical activities, and those who have applied them in the past are constantly learning a lot and are
discovering interesting digital educational technologies.
   Especially teachers note that the “Digital Teacher’s Workshop” project has proved to be a valuable
motivational tool during the university’s transition to distance, and information, derived from this

                                                     55
project, providing support for the transition to distance learning. The project helped not to lose optimism
and to gain confidence in the future among university teachers. [2]
   Thus, as the experience of the Institute of Online Education has shown, an open educational online
environment requires a special approach to its construction and implementation.
   Important factors to consider, which improve the quality of online education:
        student-centered principle;
        development of quality educational content;
        application of open educational resources;
        use of modern digital technologies;
        conduct of extracurricular educational activities;
        working with teachers to develop digital technologies;
        researching an online environment.
   A structured system based on identified factors will create a quality open educational environment
for any university.

3. Acknowledgments

    The authors of the article are grateful to the University administration for their support and
contributions to the research as well as to the teachers who participated. The authors are also grateful
to the staff of the Laboratory of Online Learning and Data Analysis in Education for their literature
selection and assistance in translating the article’s metadata.

4. References
[1] C. Zhang et al., Blended Teaching Based on Multiple Teaching and Learning Platforms: A Case
     Study of Programming Course. 10th International Conference on Educational and Information
     Technology (ICEIT), IEEE, 2021, pp. 19-23.
[2] E. A. Kameneva, G. V. Mozhaeva, M. A. Selivanova, Digital educational technologies in the
     conditions of increasing the international competitiveness of universities, Management and
     Business Administration, 2020, No. 3, pp. 123-136.
[3] J. P. Stovall et al., Student and instructor generated open educational resources compare favorably
     to a traditional textbook, Journal of Forestry (2019), №. 4, pp. 370-378.
[4] K. S. Kumar et al., Social Media as an Open Educational Practice Tools and Challenges, Library
     Philosophy and Practice, 2021, pp. 1-24.
[5] M. S. Ramirez-Montoya, Challenges for Open Education with Educational Innovation: A
     Systematic Literature Review, 2020. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7053/htm.
[6] M. V. Ushakova, A. V. Gabalin, I. S. Parshina, Implementation of Interdisciplinary Relations on
     the Example of Professional Training in “Business Informatics” in the Context of a Pandemic, 1st
     International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education (TELE), IEEE,
     2021, pp. 155-159.
[7] N. A. Adelbaeva, N. A. Guseva, S. K. Suleimenova, Characteristics of the issue of the formation
     and development of open education in Kazakhstan, The Scientific Heritage, 2021, No. 66-4. URL:
     https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-harakteristike-voprosa-stanovleniya-i-razvitiya-otkrytogo-
     obrazovaniya-v-kazahstane.
[8] O. M. Babanskaya, G. V. Mozhaeva, A.V. Feshchenko, Quality management as a condition for the
     development of e-learning in a modern university, Humanities Informatics, 2016, No. 11. pp.. 60-
     72. DOI: 10.17223/23046082/11/8.
[9] S. D. Neverkovich et al., Principles, and technologies of improving the educational autonomy of
     students in the conditions of two-level education, Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 2019,
     №. 4, pp. 1180-1188.
[10] S. Liu, Application of online courses and teaching model of "blended + Flipped", ACM
     International Conference Proceeding Series, CIMTECH 2021, Jakarta.



                                                     56
[11] T. Yu. Krotenko, Development of an open global educational space, 2020. URL:
     https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razvitie-otkrytogo-globalnogo-obrazovatelnogo-prostranstva.
[12] V. O. Zinchenko, Open educational space: the concept and essential characteristics, Izvestiya
     VSPU, 2019, No. 9 (142). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otkrytoe-obrazovatelnoe-
     prostranstvo-ponyatie-i-suschnostnye-harakteristiki.
[13] Y. Guibin, W. Qianyu, Research on The Influence of Blended Teaching on Autonomous Learning
     Ability of College Students Based on a Structural Equation Model. 2nd International Conference
     on Education, Knowledge and Information Management (ICEKIM), IEEE, 2021, pp. 389-394.




                                                 57