<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>A Concept for Highly Automated Pre-Labeling via Cross-Domain Label Transfer for Perception in Autonomous Driving</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>nis Hus</string-name>
          <email>dhuseljic@uni-kassel.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Kassel</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Wilhelmsh ̈oher Allee, 34121 Kassel</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>This article proposes a novel concept to leverage the timeconsuming labeling process for training object detectors in automated driving. The approach uses pre-trained probabilistic, well-calibrated object detectors for different sensor modalities. Based on the knowledge about the sensor extrinsics, the probabilistic detections are transformed from one sensor modality into another. These transformed detections are then used as pre-labels for the respective sensor modality. However, these pre-labels are error-prone, such that we propose an additional dedicated labeling quality assessment. The latter allows us to attach a quality seal to automatically pre-labeled data sets and is the starting point for interactive human-in-the-loop learning.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Highly Automated Pre-Labeling</kwd>
        <kwd>Object Detection</kwd>
        <kwd>HumanIn-The-Loop Learning</kwd>
        <kwd>Autonomous Driving</kwd>
        <kwd>Imperfect Labels</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Artificial intelligence and, in particular, machine learning (ML) are the enabling
technologies in autonomous driving. In this context, ML and deep learning
techniques are already successfully used for perception, i.e., sensory environment
and object recognition [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. Training and validating these mostly deep neural
networks, e.g., convolutional neural networks (CNN), requires vast amounts
of labeled data. However, labeling, especially for object detection, is a
timeconsuming and, therefore, costly task [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ]. In this article, we present an approach
to significantly reduce the labeling effort in the particular application domain of
ML-based object detection for highly automated driving. Our approach considers
that many modern vehicles are equipped with various sensors, including
cameras, LiDAR, and RADAR. We exploit this sensor diversity (i.e., the strengths
and weaknesses of the respective sensors [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]) in our approach by transferring
labels between different sensor modalities. First, we train object detectors for
the single sensors. We further use these predictions as so-called pre-labels (i.e.,
imperfect, potentially error-prone labels). These can, in turn, be used to improve
the object detectors of the other sensor modality. Our approach can be
understood as semi-supervised cross-domain learning [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], whereas the object detectors
© 2021 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under CC BY 4.0.
are interpreted as multiple error-prone annotators [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. However, in safety-critical
applications such as highly automated driving, the created labelings must be
quality-checked to ensure that no incorrect concepts are learned.
      </p>
      <p>Contributions: We address this problem by proposing a detailed concept to
automatically generate pre-labelings via cross-domain label transfer for
perception in autonomous driving. Therefore, we identify four major research questions
arising within our concept’s stages and provide ideas for targeting each of them.
We envision our concept as an application-driven starting point for
human-inthe-loop learning. In this context, our concept provides methods leveraging
interactive learning techniques in object detection, e.g., probabilistic object detectors,
improving the labeling quality, coping with imperfect labels, and decreasing
annotation effort. As another major contribution, we see the quality assessment
of pre-labelings to support subsequent human-in-the-loop learning processes. In
this sense, we aim to provide a quality seal to pre-labeled data sets, e.g.,
prelabels having an expected mean average precision of 90%.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Highly Automated Pre-Labeling</title>
      <p>This section describes the four stages of our concept (cf. Fig. 1) and formulates
research questions. In the first stage, we develop probabilistic object detectors.
The second stage aims to improve the calibration of these detectors further.
Subsequently, the probabilistic predictions are interpreted as pre-labels of the
different sensor modalities and optionally fused in the third stage. Finally, the
concept is concluded by the fourth stage, including a labeling quality assessment
based on probabilistic outputs. It serves as a starting point for human-in-the-loop
learning to refine the pre-labels and release them for further model training.</p>
      <p>Camera
LiDAR</p>
      <p>Images</p>
      <p>Stage I
Probabilistic
Object Detector
Probabilistic
Object Detector</p>
      <p>Probabilistic
Class Labels</p>
      <p>+
Probabilistic
3D Bounding</p>
      <p>Boxes
New Data for Training</p>
      <p>Stage II
Probability
Calibration
Probability
Calibration</p>
      <p>Labeled Data</p>
      <p>Calibrated
Class Labels</p>
      <p>+
Calibrated
3D Bounding</p>
      <p>Boxes</p>
      <p>Stage III
Probabilistic
Sensor Fusion</p>
      <p>Label</p>
      <p>Transfer
Annotator</p>
      <p>Human in
the Loop</p>
      <p>Pre-labeled Data</p>
      <p>Stage IV
Labeling Quality</p>
      <p>Assessment
Fig. 1. Illustration of the proposed highly automated labeling process exemplary shown
for two sensors. Dashed arrows represent optional processes.</p>
      <p>
        A Concept fHorigHhilgyhAlyuAtoumtoamteadtePdrPe-rLea-LbaeblinelginvgiaviCarCorsoss-Ds-oDmomainainLaLbaebleTlTrarnasnfsefrer
Stage I: Probabilistic Object Detection – How to train probabilistic object
detectors for different sensor modalities? In stage I, we consider pre-trained
object detectors for different sensor domains, i.e., camera- and LiDAR-based object
detectors [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20 ref21">20, 21</xref>
        ]. Common object detectors provide point estimates for the
classification probabilities of the object and the coordinates of its 3D bounding box,
i.e., position in space, the yaw angle, and its size [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ]. In contrast,
probabilistic object detectors provide predictive distributions for all quantities. Starting
from pre-trained CNNs for 3D bounding box detection, e.g., for camera [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
        ]
and LiDAR [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
        ], the main challenge will be a meaningful separation between
aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] without massively increasing
computational complexity during training and inference. Therefore, we aim to leverage
the approach proposed in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ], which enforces specific properties, i.e.,
smoothness and sensitivity in the feature space learned by a deep neural network. In
this way, we can capture epistemic uncertainty by distributing that features and
aleatoric uncertainty by evaluating the entropy of its predictive distribution.
Stage II: Probability Calibration – How to further improve the calibration
of the probabilistic detectors? In stage II, we aim at improving probabilistic
outputs by the object detectors as a foundation for the estimation of the labeling
quality of the pre-labeling. For example, if the detector outputs a probability for
a car with 90%, this statement should also be true in exactly 90% of the cases.
The same applies to the probabilistic estimation of continuous target values,
e.g., the coordinates of a 3D bounding box. However, deep neural networks
tend to frequently output overconfident predictions, which can be alleviated
through probability calibration methods [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15 ref3">3, 15</xref>
        ]. We intend to investigate
posthoc calibration methods, such as temperature scaling [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], and proper scoring
rules to optimize the probabilistic object detectors [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Stage III: Label-Transfer and Probabilistic Sensor Fusion – How to
transfer labels between different sensor modalities and combine probabilistic
predictions originating from different sensor modalities? In stage III, we use the
extrinsic sensor parameters to transfer pre-labels from one sensor domain to
another. Therefore, we assume that the sensor extrinsics are known in advance. The
transferred pre-labels can be used as labels for the other sensor modality and
vice-versa. Moreover, we also investigate the fusion of probabilistic pre-labels
(i.e., detections) originating from different sensor modalities (cf. stage I and II).
The fusion is realized employing a Bayesian approach (cf. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]). Therefore, we aim
at examining using a joint probabilistic data-association filter [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] for the
assignment of 3D bounding box detection from each sensor modality. Furthermore, we
investigate the usage of Kalman and particle filters for object tracking [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
        ].
Stage IV: Labeling Quality Assessment – How to assess the label quality
of probabilistic 3D bounding box predictions? In stage IV, the aim is to assess
the labeling quality [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16 ref7">7, 16</xref>
        ] of the obtained pre-labeled data set. For this purpose,
we use the probabilistic predictions and determine expected values, e.g., with
respect to the number of expected false classifications, the undetected objects,
or the bounding box error. At this point, we want to explore the extent to
which these expectations hold. Based on this, we aim to derive a quality seal
for the pre-labeled data set. In this context, a starting point for the pre-labeling
quality estimation is the ML-based online performance estimation using multiple
sensors [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. Moreover, we expect to assess whether a camera can be used for
labeling LiDAR and vice-versa and when such a label transfer is useful. Ideally,
the final labeling quality assessment supports human experts to decide whether
individual bounding boxes need to be re-labeled (cf. active learning [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ]) or
whether the pre-labeling is of sufficient quality to release the pre-labeled dataset
for further processing such as model training.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>This article presents a novel concept for highly automated pre-labeling via
crossdomain label transfer for perception in autonomous driving. The novelty of our
concept lies in the label transfer exploiting the strengths and weaknesses of
different sensor modalities for object detection. The use of multiple sensors to
improve perception is not new. However, the use for pre-labeling (in the context of
3D bounding box detection) in combination with an explicit quality assessment
component under consideration of calibrated probabilistic predictions represents
a novel approach. It allows us to attach a quality seal to pre-labeled data sets.
The quality assessment is the starting point for human-in-the-loop learning and
iterative model improvement. Although our concept focuses on the autonomous
driving domain with LiDAR and camera sensors, it can be extended toward
multiple sensors and possibly different applications involving data from multiple
sensors. Moreover, the presented ideas form a foundation for further
investigations in the area of interactive adaptive learning. For example, the uncertainty
estimates of the developed probabilistic object detectors might be used to derive
novel utility measures for active learning in object detection.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This work results from the project KI Data Tooling (19A20001O) funded by
German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWI) and the
DeCoInt2-project financed by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within
the priority program SPP 1835: “Kooperativ interagierende Automobile”, grant
number SI 674/11-2. We, in particular, thank Kristina Dingel, Alice
MoallemyOureh, and Daniel Kottke for their insightful feedback.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bar-Shalom</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Daum</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The probabilistic data association filter</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Control Systems Magazine</source>
          <volume>29</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>82</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>100</lpage>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2. van Engelen,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.E.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Hoos</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.:
          <article-title>A survey on semi-supervised learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>Machine Learning</source>
          <volume>109</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>373</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>440</lpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Feng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rosenbaum</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Gla¨ser,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Timm</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Dietmayer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>K.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Can We Trust You? On Calibration of a Probabilistic Object Detector for Autonomous Driving</article-title>
          . In: IEEE/RSJ IROS Workshops. Macau,
          <string-name>
            <surname>China</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Feng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Haase-Schu¨tz,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Rosenbaum</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Hertlein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>H.</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Gla¨ser,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Timm</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Wiesbeck</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Dietmayer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>K.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Deep multi-modal object detection and semantic segmentation for autonomous driving: Datasets, methods, and challenges</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE T-ITS</source>
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1341</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1360</lpage>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pleiss</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sun</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weinberger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.Q.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks</article-title>
          . In: ICML. pp.
          <fpage>1321</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1330</lpage>
          . Sydney,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>NSW</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Australia</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gustafsson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Statistical Sensor Fusion</article-title>
          . Stud.Lit. AB, Lund, Sweden (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7. Haase-Schu¨tz,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Hertlein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Wiesbeck</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>W.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Estimating labeling quality with deep object detectors</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: IV</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>33</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>38</lpage>
          . Paris, France (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Harakeh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Waslander</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Estimating and Evaluating Regression Predictive Uncertainty in Deep Object Detectors</article-title>
          . In: ICLR (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Herde</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kottke</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huseljic</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sick</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Multi-Annotator Probabilistic Active Learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: ICPR</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>10281</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>10288</lpage>
          . Milan,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Italy</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huseljic</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sick</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Herde</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kottke</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Separation of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in deterministic deep neural networks</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: ICPR</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>9172</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>9179</lpage>
          . Milan,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Italy</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Klingner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Ba¨r, A.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mross</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fingscheidt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Improving Online Performance Prediction for Semantic Segmentation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: CVPR Workshop Safe Artificial Intelligence for Automated Driving</source>
          . p.
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kowol</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rottmann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bracke</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gottschalk</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.:
          <article-title>YOdar: Uncertainty-based Sensor Fusion for Vehicle Detection with Camera and Radar Sensors</article-title>
          . In: ICAART. pp.
          <fpage>177</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>186</lpage>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mousavian</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Anguelov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Flynn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Koˇsecka´, J.:
          <article-title>3D Bounding Box Estimation Using Deep Learning and Geometry</article-title>
          . In: CVPR. pp.
          <fpage>5632</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>5640</lpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mukhoti</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kirsch</surname>
            , A., van Amersfoort,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Torr</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Deterministic neural networks with appropriate inductive biases capture epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty</article-title>
          .
          <source>arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.11582</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Niculescu-Mizil</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Caruana</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R.:
          <article-title>Predicting good probabilities with supervised learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: ICML</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>625</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>632</lpage>
          . New York, NY (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Northcutt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jiang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chuang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labels</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research</source>
          <volume>70</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>1373</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1411</lpage>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Papadopoulos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Uijlings</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.R.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Keller, F.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ferrari</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Extreme Clicking for Efficient Object Annotation</article-title>
          . In: ICCV. pp.
          <fpage>4940</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>4949</lpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Settles</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Active Learning Literature Survey</article-title>
          .
          <source>Tech. rep.</source>
          , University of WisconsinMadison (
          <year>2010</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          19.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thrun</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Burgard</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fox</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (eds.):
          <article-title>Probabilistic Robotics. Intelligent Robotics</article-title>
          and Autonomous Agents, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          20.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Kra¨henbu¨hl, P.:
          <article-title>Center-based 3D Object Detection and Tracking</article-title>
          .
          <source>CVPR</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          21.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Kra¨henbu¨hl, P.:
          <article-title>Objects as Points</article-title>
          . arXiv preprint arXiv:
          <year>1904</year>
          .
          <volume>07850</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>