<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>ORCID:</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>in the Context of Their Educational Activity</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Svetlana Bezgodova</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Anastasia Miklyaeva</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>48 Moyka Emb., St Petersburg 191186, Russian Federation</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2021</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>000</volume>
      <fpage>0</fpage>
      <lpage>0001</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The article presents the results of an experimental study aimed at identifying the objective and subjective characteristics of a search task that mediate the choice of online information search strategies by schoolchildren in the context their educational activity. The sample consisted of 44 schoolchildren (11-16 years old, grades 5th-9th), who consistently performed simple and complicated online search tasks. No statistically significant effect was found for influence of the degree of search task complexity on such characteristics of online search as the number of search queries, the number of viewed sites and the time spent on the search. At the same time, the characteristics of online search are determined by subjective assessments of the task itself and the conditions for its implementation. Significant mediators of the online search characteristics in the situation of performing a simple search task were the general user confidence, as well as the motivation to complete the task and its subjective complexity. The characteristics of performing a complicated search task were mediated by the motivation as well as by the degree of awareness of the problem field for searching.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>1 Online search</kwd>
        <kwd>schoolchildren</kwd>
        <kwd>simple search task</kwd>
        <kwd>complicated search task</kwd>
        <kwd>motivation</kwd>
        <kwd>user confidence</kwd>
        <kwd>awareness in the subject field of search</kwd>
        <kwd>subjective complexity</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        In recent years, the search for educational information on the Internet has firmly entered the daily
life of schoolchildren. Today online search takes a leading position in the structure of online
educational activity throughout school time [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. With the help of online search engines,
schoolchildren solve a wide range of information problems in their educational activities, including
the search for additional and reference information, training and testing materials, textbooks, etc. The
widespread use of online search as an element of modern educational activity determines the
relevance of studying the psychological mechanisms that determine its qualitative and quantitative
characteristics and, ultimately, contribute to the successful achievement of search goals.
      </p>
      <p>
        According to T. D. Wilson, online information search is the search for information on the Internet
in order to meet an information need, which includes physical and mental actions aimed at
assimilating the information found into the existing knowledge system [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. Online search is a complex
process that involves sequential realization of a number of actions related to finding, selecting and
evaluating information, as well as the synthesis of information from different web pages to solve an
information problem (see, for example, [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4 ref5 ref6 ref7 ref8">3-8</xref>
        ]). Among the most significant procedural characteristics
of online search, the time spent on the search and the volume of analyzed information are
distinguished, and the main resulting characteristic is the accuracy of the search result [9; 10]. These
criteria describe a “necessary and sufficient” minimum to characterize online search behavior in the
situation of searching for factual information that does not require subsequent assimilation into the
knowledge system of the searching person. However, it is obvious that the educational online search
activity of schoolchildren is not limited to the search for individual facts and involves the need for
synthesis of the information in a system of representations, which has been formed earlier. The
studies aimed at analyzing online search activity of schoolchildren show that extremely important
characteristics of online search in educational activity are the relevance of search queries and
information that is provided as a result of search activity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], as well as the ability to use the
information to improve subsequent search queries and to present the final search result [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. Thus, if
online search is related to educational activity, it is important not only the accuracy of the information
found, but also the opportunity to use it for completing the educational task [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Previous studies show that the online search behavior differs depending on the characteristics of
the task that should be completed. The most common classification of online search tasks suggests
their differentiation into simple and complicated ones. A simple task involves searching for
unambiguous answers to search queries, which do not imply a multi-meaning interpretation of the
relevance of the found information to the initial search problem. A complicated task is an open
question, which has no ready-made ways to perform the task and unambiguous requirements for
search results [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ]. The key difference between a complicated search task and a simple one is a much
higher degree of interactivity in the process of completing it [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The complexity of the search task is determined not only by the features of the task itself, but also
by the ways in which it is interpreted by the person performing the informational online search [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ].
The degree of “simplicity” or “complexity” of the search task is determined by the objective
characteristics of the task as well as by the subjective assessment of its complexity. Empirical studies
show that subjective assessments of the complexity of the task have a significant impact on how
effective the search will be recognized. People rate the performance of an online search lower when
they consider the task difficult and do not have unambiguous criteria for evaluating the results of their
search activity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ]. Thus, the complexity of the search task as one of the factors determining the
characteristics of its completing has both objective and subjective components.
      </p>
      <p>
        Subjective factors that mediate online searching behavior also include the experience of online
search activity, interest in the search problem, and the degree of awareness in the subject field in
which the search is performed. For example, the experience of online search activity determines the
search strategies preferred by users [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ], the ways for search queries phrasing [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], and the speed of
switching between search engine responses [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ]. The influence of the awareness factor in the subject
field of the search ("background knowledge") determines the degree of flexibility of the search
strategy [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ] and the quality of assessing the relevance of the information found to the search goals
[19; 20]. Motivation to perform a search task determines the relationship between the search
performance and the evaluation of the effectiveness of one's own actions to search for information,
while reducing the negative impact of search failures [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>It is important to note that the information described above is obtained mainly from the analysis of
online search behavior of students and/or adults, who solve search problems that are not related to
educational activities. The question about the objective and subjective characteristics of the search
task which have an impact on the search actions of schoolchildren in the process of solving
educational problems is insufficiently studied.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. The present study</title>
      <p>Our research is aimed at identifying the objective and subjective characteristics of the search task
that mediate the choice of an online information search strategy by schoolchildren in the context of
their educational activity. To evaluate online search strategies, we use indicators such as the number
of search queries, the number of sites viewed, and the time spent on online search for the necessary
information. In accordance with the results of previous studies, the objective characteristic of the
search task is the degree of its simplicity/complexity, which varied by the instructions for participants
of the study. Subjective characteristics are represented by the following parameters: assessment of the
complexity of the task by schoolchildren who took part in the study; self-assessment of awareness in
the subject field within which the search is carried out; self-assessment of experience in the online
search for the necessary information; assessment of satisfaction with the online search process and the
intermediate results achieved; self-assessment of motivation to perform search tasks.</p>
      <p>During the data analysis, the following research questions are answered:
1) What are the characteristics of the online information search strategies, which are carried out by
schoolchildren in the process of completing simple and complicated search tasks in the context of
educational activity?</p>
      <p>2) What is the contribution of subjective characteristics of the search task to the online search
strategies implemented by schoolchildren in their educational activities?</p>
      <p>The hypothesis of our study suggests that the individual strategies of online information search
that schoolchildren use for performing simple and complicated search tasks are different, and their
features are mediated by the subjective characteristics of the search task.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Materials and methods</title>
      <p>The study involved 44 schoolchildren of secondary schools (grades 5th–9th) aged 11–16
(13.66±1.92 years old), including 18 girls and 26 boys. All schoolchildren took part in the study
voluntarily. Inclusion in the sample presupposed a preliminary interview with a potential participant
and his/her parent (legal representative). Both the participant and his/her parent (legal representative)
signed an informed consent to take a part in the study.</p>
      <p>The study was conducted as laboratory experiment. The participants worked individually. Each of
them was consistently offered two tasks, similar to the usual school task related to the search for
additional information. The tasks varied in their degree of complexity. The schoolchildren completed
the following tasks:
1) Simple search task: “Prepare a short message (up to 5 minutes) about the planet Mars”
2) A complicated search task: “Humanity has long dreamed of living on other planets. Mars is a
planet adjacent to Earth in the Solar System, so its development, along with the development of
Venus, looks most likely. Prepare a short (up to 5 minutes) message about what humanity needs to do
to make Mars habitable”.</p>
      <p>To complete these tasks, schoolchildren were asked to use a computer with the Windows 10
operating system, a 17-inch monitor, a keyboard and a computer mouse, as well as a pre-installed
Google Chrome browser. The browser icon was displayed on the desktop, which opened immediately
after the computer took working mode. The online search process was recorded using the Bandicam
screen capture program. We analyzed parameters such as the number of search queries (in absolute
units), the number of sites viewed (in absolute units), and the time spent searching for the information
to complete the task (in seconds). At the end of the work, the schoolchildren presented their answers
to the experimenter.</p>
      <p>Before the participants were presented with the main tasks, each of them answered the following
questions:
1) How well do you know how to search for the information on the Internet? (the question for
studying the self-assessment of competence in the issues of informational online search).
2) How well do you know astronomy, and in particular, how well do you know about the planet
Mars? (the question for assessing awareness in the subject area in which the online search is
performed).</p>
      <p>After completing each search task, the schoolchildren were asked another questions:
1) How interesting was the task? (the question to assess the motivation for the completed task).
2) How difficult was the task? (the question for assessing the subjective complexity of the task).
3) How satisfied are you with the progress of the task, did everything work out as you wanted?
(the question for assessing satisfaction with the online search process and intermediate
results).</p>
      <p>To answer each of these questions participants have10-point scale.</p>
      <p>Statistical data processing was carried out with the use of Statistica10.0 software package and
included the calculation of descriptive statistics (means, M; standard deviations, σ; medians, Me), as
well as analysis of variance (F).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Results</title>
      <p>The program and protocol of the study were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Herzen
State Pedagogical University of Russia, decision No. 17 (29.10.2020).</p>
      <p>At the first stage, we described the characteristics of online information search, which was
performed by schoolchildren for completing simple and complicated tasks. The results showed that in
both cases schoolchildren most often ask one search query, as a rule, almost verbatim repeating the
phrasing of the task (29 cases for performing the simple task and 28 cases for performing the
complicated task, 65.9% and 63.6%, respectively). During review the search results they usually work
with the materials of one site for completing the simple task (30 cases, 68.2%) and one or two sites
for completing the complicated task (26 cases, 59.1%), giving a stable preference to Wikipedia
materials (in our study, all schoolchildren without exception used Wikipedia). In general, the
performance of a complicated task is characterized by slightly higher indicators of the number of
search queries, the number of sites viewed and the time spent on searching for information, but these
differences do not reach the level of statistical significance (see Table 1). There were no significant
differences in the characteristics of online search between groups of schoolchildren with different
ages, as well as different genders.</p>
      <p>In the second stage of the study, we divided the sample into four subgroups on the basis of each
task separately with the use of the median values for online search indicators: 1) fast analysis of a
small amount of information; 2) fast analysis of a large amount of information; 3) slow analysis of a
small amount of information; 4) slow analysis of a large amount of information.</p>
      <p>According to the results of the simple task we identified four the following groups: fast analysis of
a small amount of information – 16 participants (10 boys and 6 girls), 13.20±1.56 years old; fast
analysis of a large amount of information – 8 participants (4 boys and 4 girls), 14.00±2.09 years old;
slow analysis of a small amount of information-10 participants (6 boys and 4 girls), 14.00±1.85 years
old; slow analysis of a large amount of information – 10 participants (6 boys and 4 girls), 14.11±1.96
years old. There were no statistical differences in the age or gender composition between the
subgroups, although it can be noted that the subgroup of schoolchildren who quickly process a small
amount of information is made up of relatively younger participants, in comparison with other
subgroups. On the basis of the complicated task results the group was divided into similar subgroups:
fast analysis of a small amount of information – 12 participants (7 boys and 5 girls), 13.55±1.63 years
old; fast analysis of a large amount of information – 9 participants (6 boys and 3 girls), 14.16±1.47
years old; slow analysis of a small amount of information – 12 participants (6 boys and 6 girls),
13.33±1.87 years old; slow analysis of a large amount of information – 11 participants (7 boys and 4
girls), 14.11±2.14 years old. These subgroups also do not differ in age or gender composition,
although (at the trend level) older participants usually worked with a larger amount of information
during performing a search educational task than younger participants in the study.</p>
      <p>A comparison of these subgroups showed that the complete coincidence of the characteristics of
the search speed and the volume of the analyzed information occurs only in every third case (i14
participants), which highlights that the simplicity/complexity of the search task affects the
characteristics of the online search activity of schoolchildren.</p>
      <p>The analysis of variance allowed us to identify objective and subjective characteristics of search
tasks with varying degrees of complexity, which affect the parameters of the searching activity in
schoolchildren. For a simple search task, significant factors were interest in the task and
selfassessment of competence in online search, which are associated with analyzing more information
regardless of the speed of the task completing, as well as the subjective complexity of the task, which
leads to an increase in the time spent on its implementation, regardless of how much information is
analyzed. In the case of a complicated search task, a lower speed of task completion is determined by
interest and awareness in the subject area (see Table 2).
Notes: FS – “Fast analysis of a small amount of information” subgroup; FL – “Fast analysis of a large
amount of information” subgroup; SS – “Slow analysis of a small amount of information” subgroup;
SL – “Slow analysis of a large amount of information” subgroup; * – р≤0.05.</p>
      <p>The assessment of satisfaction with the online search process did not demonstrate a significant
impact on the speed of completing search tasks and the amount of processed information, regardless
of the degree of task complexity.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Discussion</title>
      <p>Our research allowed us to describe the characteristics of the online information search strategies,
which is carried out by schoolchildren in the process of completing simple and complicated search
tasks in the context of their educational activity. An important advantage of the study was its
experimental format, which promoted studying the features of online searching behavior of
schoolchildren in terms close to a real educational situations.</p>
      <p>
        The results showed that regardless of the simplicity/complexity of the search task, schoolchildren,
as a rule, use a small number of search queries (and often only one search query), the phrasing of
which to some extent repeats the phrasing of the initial task. During scanning the search results
provided by the search engine, schoolchildren most often view the materials of one or two sites from
the first list of search results and give preference to materials from Wikipedia. The preference for
online resources of the Wiki type is also highlighted in other studies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        In general, we should note that schoolchildren showed not too high skills of online search for
educational information. Interestingly, that the lack of these skills in youth is also found by other
researchers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>
        ]. Schoolchildren often look through one or two pages and perform their educational
task using the “copy-paste” method, and they often do not treat the found information critically
enough [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>
        ]. However, this strategy of online search was the most common among schoolchildren
who took part in our study (it was preferred by two-thirds of the participants), so we can assume that
in the process of completing educational tasks with the use online information search, schoolchildren
most often resort to this way to organizing their online activity. In this regard, the interesting and
important question arises: whether the preference for this an online searching strategy is universal for
all types of online search at school age, or whether it is typical only for the situation of performing
educational tasks. The search for an answer to this question is the prospect of our future investigation.
      </p>
      <p>
        Despite the fact that we did not get statistically significant differences in the parameters of
evaluating online search strategies in the situation of performing a simple and complicated tasks, the
statistical trends indicate that as the search task becomes more complicate, the amount of analyzed
information and the time spent on its processing increases. This conclusion is consistent with the
results of other studies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ], and, in all likelihood, characterizes the general trend of the dependence
of the time and speed characteristics of online search on the degree of search task complexity. The
lack of statistically significant differences may be explained by the relatively small sample size.
      </p>
      <p>
        Dividing the sample into subgroups on the basis of median values of the information amount and
the speed of searching, we noticed that the time and speed characteristics of the tasks with various
different degrees of complexity for the same participant can vary significantly. This fact suggests that
the choice of an online search strategy is determined not only by the objective characteristics of the
search task (in our case, the degree of its complexity), but also by the subjective assessments of the
task that should be completed. The results showed that the universal subjective factor that affects the
characteristics of online search activity of schoolchildren in the situation of performing an educational
task is the motivation to complete it, expressed in interest. In the case of the simple search task,
interest primarily contributes to an increase in the amount of scanned information, in the case of a
complicated task it determines an increase in the time that the participants spend on completing it.
This probably corresponds with the patterns noted in previous studies, which showed that an increase
in the information amount does not always lead to an increase in duration of online search, which is
largely determined by the cognitive capabilities of a person [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>
        ]. User confidence, which contributes
to an increase in the amount of information processed, as well as a subjective assessment of the task
complexity, which increases the duration of its performing, also affect characteristics of the strategy
for completing a simple search task. In the case of a complicated search task, the increase in the time
characteristics of the search is also facilitated by awareness in the subject area, which is associated
with the search task. These results generally correspond to the data obtained in other studies [16-21;
27] and allow us to specify the contribution of various subjective characteristics of the search task to
the choice of its implementation online searching strategy. It is proved that the universal characteristic
in this context is the motivation to complete the task, while other characteristics are selectively
associated with either a simple or a complicated search task.
      </p>
      <p>Special attention should be paid to the fact that the parameter of satisfaction with the search
process and intermediate results did not demonstrate a significant impact on the characteristics of
online searching behavior of schoolchildren. In our opinion, this is indirect evidence that
schoolchildren do not fully take into account the current dynamics of online search, being focused
mainly on the assessment of the task itself. As monitoring the online search process is an important
resource for improving its effectiveness [28; 29], it is promising to develop training programs aimed
at promoting the formation of students’ skills for monitoring their online search activity.</p>
      <p>Of course, our study has a number of limitations, primarily due to the relatively small sample size
and the content specifics of search tasks, which may also be an independent factor that mediates the
choice of an online searching strategy. We can also suppose that the empirical results (in particular,
the search time) were influenced by information processing skills and especially reading skills
[3031].Nevertheless, taking into account these limitations, we can say that the hypothesis of our study
was only partially confirmed. On the basis of analyzing online search in the educational activity of
schoolchildren, no statistically significant differences were revealed in the characteristics of online
information search strategies which are used in performing simple and complicated search tasks, but it
was proved that online search is mediated by the subjective characteristics of the search task, which
differently manifest their contribution depending on the degree of task complexity.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Conclusion</title>
      <p>The results of our research show that the choice of an online search strategy that students make
during the course of an educational task is determined by the degree of complexity of the search task.
The characteristics of search activity in the situation of a simple search task vary depending on the
interest in it, the subjective assessment of its complexity, as well as the overall confidence of the user.
In the situation of a complicated search task, in addition to motivation, the degree of awareness of the
problem comes to the fore. We believe that it is important to use these results for planning the
educational activities of schoolchildren related to the search for additional information on the Internet.
Further research may concern the studying the effectiveness of assimilating an educational
information obtained through various online search strategies in school age.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>7. Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>This research is funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No. 19-29-14005).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>8. References</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Miklyaeva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Bezgodova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Educational Online Activity in Adolescents with Various Academic Achievements</article-title>
          ,
          <source>ARPHA Proceedings</source>
          ,
          <volume>3</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>1629</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1638</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3897/ap.2.e1629
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Wilson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Information seeking behaviour and the digital information world</article-title>
          ,
          <source>European Science Editing</source>
          ,
          <volume>30</volume>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
          <fpage>77</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>81</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Argelagоs</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Pifarrе</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Improving information problem solving skills in secondary education through embedded instruction</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computers in Human Behavior</source>
          ,
          <volume>28</volume>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ),
          <fpage>515</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>526</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.chb.
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <volume>10</volume>
          .024
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Gerjets</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Kammerer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Werner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Learning and Instruction</source>
          ,
          <volume>21</volume>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
          <fpage>220</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>231</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.learninstruc.
          <year>2010</year>
          .
          <volume>02</volume>
          .005
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Kammerer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Amann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Gerjets</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>When adults without university education search the Internet for health information: The roles of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs and a source evaluation intervention</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computers in Human Behavior</source>
          ,
          <volume>48</volume>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
          <fpage>297</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>309</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.chb.
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <volume>01</volume>
          .045
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Monchaux</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Amadieu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Chevalier</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Marine</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Query strategies during information searching: Effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved</article-title>
          .
          <source>Information, Processing and Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>51</volume>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
          <fpage>557</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>569</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.ipm.
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <volume>05</volume>
          .004
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Roscoe</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Grebitus</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J. O'Brian</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Johnson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , I. Kula,
          <article-title>Online information search and decision making: Effects of web search stance</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computers in Human Behavior</source>
          ,
          <volume>56</volume>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
          <fpage>103</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>118</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.chb.
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <volume>11</volume>
          .028
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Scott</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M. K. O'Sullivan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Analyzing student search strategies: Making a case for integrating information literacy skills into the curriculum</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Teacher Librarian</source>
          ,
          <volume>33</volume>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
          <fpage>21</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>25</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Aula</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Nordhausen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Modeling successful performance in web searching</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</source>
          ,
          <volume>57</volume>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
          <fpage>1678</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1693</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1002/asi.20340
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A systematic understanding of successful web searches in information-based tasks</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Educational Technology &amp; Society</source>
          ,
          <volume>16</volume>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
          <fpage>321</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>331</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Beal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. H.</given-names>
            <surname>Stevens</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Improving students' problem solving in a web-based chemistry simulation through embedded metacognitive messages</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Technology, Instrumentation, Cognition and Learning</source>
          ,
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
          <fpage>255</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>271</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Graesser</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J. Wiley,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Goldman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>T. O'Reilly</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jeon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B. McDaniel</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>SEEK</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Web tutor: Fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Metacognition and Learning</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <fpage>89</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>105</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s11409-007-9013-x
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Byström</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Järvelin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Task Complexity Affects Information Seeking and Use, Information Processing &amp; Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>31</volume>
          (
          <year>1995</year>
          )
          <fpage>191</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>213</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/
          <fpage>0306</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>4573</lpage>
          (
          <issue>95</issue>
          )
          <fpage>80035</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>R</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Singer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
            <surname>Norbisrath</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Lewandowski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Ordinary search engine users carrying out complex search tasks</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Information Science</source>
          ,
          <volume>39</volume>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
          <fpage>346</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>358</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1177/0165551512466974
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Wildemuth</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Freund</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Toms,
          <article-title>Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Documentation</source>
          ,
          <volume>70</volume>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <fpage>1118</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1140</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1108/JD-03-2014-0056
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Sünkler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Lewandowski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Does it matter which search engine is used? A user study using post-task relevance judgments</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Proceedings of the 80th Annual Meeting of the Association of Information Science and Technology</source>
          , (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
          <article-title>VA: Crystal City 405-414</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1002/pr a2.
          <year>2017</year>
          .14505401044
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Navarro-Prieto</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Scaife</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Rogers</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Cognitive strategies in web searching</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Human Factors and the Web Gaithersburg. Maryland: National Institute of Standards and Technology</source>
          (
          <year>1999</year>
          )
          <fpage>43</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>56</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Hölscher</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Strube,
          <article-title>Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computer Networks</source>
          ,
          <volume>33</volume>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          )
          <fpage>337</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>346</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/S1389-
          <volume>1286</volume>
          (
          <issue>00</issue>
          )
          <fpage>00031</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Bhavnani</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>K. M. Drabenstott</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Radev</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Towards a Unified Framework of IR Tasks and Strategies</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting</source>
          ,
          <volume>38</volume>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
          <fpage>340</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>354</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Guinee</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
            <surname>Eagleton</surname>
          </string-name>
          , T. E. Hall,
          <article-title>Adolescents' internet search strategies: drawing upon familiar cognitive paradigms when accessing electronic information sources</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Educational Computing Research-</source>
          ,
          <volume>29</volume>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
          <fpage>363</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>374</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .2190/
          <string-name>
            <surname>HD0A-N15L-RTFH2DU8</surname>
          </string-name>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>David</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Song</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Hayes</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Fredin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A cyclic model of information seeking in hyperlinked environments: The role of goals, self-efficacy, and intrinsic motivation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Human-Computer Studies</source>
          ,
          <volume>65</volume>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ),
          <fpage>170</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>182</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.ijhcs.
          <year>2006</year>
          .
          <volume>09</volume>
          .004
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Song</surname>
          </string-name>
          , C. Liu,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Y. Zhang,</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Chinese college students' source selection and use in searching for health-related information online</article-title>
          .
          <source>Information Processing and Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>58</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <article-title>102489</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.ipm.
          <year>2021</year>
          .102489
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          [23]
          <string-name>
            <surname>A. A.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>AlDahdouh, Information search behavior in fragile and conflict-affected learning contexts</article-title>
          .
          <source>Internet and Higher Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>50</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <article-title>100808</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.iheduc.
          <year>2021</year>
          .100808
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          [24]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Beck</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Fischer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Braunheim</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Schmidt</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Shavelson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The role of students' beliefs when critically reasoning from multiple contradictory sources of information in performance assessments</article-title>
          .
          <source>Frontiers in Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). 2192. doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3389/fpsyg.
          <year>2020</year>
          .02192
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          [25]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Sharit</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Taya</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Berkowsky</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Czaja</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Online information search performance and search strategies in a health problem-solving scenario, Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making, 9 (</article-title>
          <year>2015</year>
          )
          <fpage>211</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>228</lpage>
          . dоi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1177/1555343415583747
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          [26]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Crescenzi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Metacognitive Knowledge and Metacognitive Regulation in Time-Constrained in Information Search, Search as Learning (</article-title>
          <year>2016</year>
          ). URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol1647/SAL2016_paper_5.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          [27]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Shi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Hu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Han,
          <article-title>Classification of the use of online health information channels and variation in motivations for channel selection: Cross-sectional survey</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Medical Internet Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>23</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>e24945</article-title>
          .
          <source>doi:10.2196/24945</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>
          [28]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Sun</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Ye</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Hsieh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Effects of student characteristics and question design on Internet search results usage in a Taiwanese classroom</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computers and Education (77)</source>
          2014
          <fpage>134</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>144</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>
          [29]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Zion</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Adler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Mevarech</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The effect of individual and social metacognitive support on students' metacognitive performances in an online discussion</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Educational Computing Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>52</volume>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
          <fpage>50</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>87</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1177/0735633114568855
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>
          [30]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Hahnel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Goldhammer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
            <surname>Kröhne</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Naumann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The role of reading skills in the evaluation of online information gathered from search engine environments</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers in Human Behavior</source>
          ,
          <volume>78</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <fpage>223</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>234</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.chb.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <volume>10</volume>
          .004
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation>
          [31]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Hahnel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Eichmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Goldhammer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Evaluation of Online Information in University Students:
          <article-title>Development and Scaling of the Screening Instrument EVON</article-title>
          . Frontiers in Psychology,
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>562128</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3389/fpsyg.
          <year>2020</year>
          .562128
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>