<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Artificial Intelligence in Customer Management Processes: a Design Perspective</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Maurizio Mesenzani</string-name>
          <email>maurizio.mesenzani@valuegs.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Angela Di Massa</string-name>
          <email>angela.dimassa@bsdesign.eu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>BSD design</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Lazzaretto 19, 20124 Milan</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>VGS</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Bicetti de' Buttinoni 3, 20156 Milan</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) among companies is expected to be pervasive in the next few years in order to support decision making, increase productivity and efficiency and define User-Centred experiences for both customers and employees. This scenario is affecting the context of Customer Management Processes, such as marketing, sales and after sales activities including front line and back office tasks where companies are experiencing an increase of volumes of available data and an unexpected amount of multichannel interactions. This caused the need to invest in AI-based solutions such as Virtual Assistants, Chatbots and Vocalbots, Robotic Process Automation and analytics tools. In early 2021, the CMMC Club (Customer Management Multimedia Competence Club, born in 1997 at the scope to promote the benchmarking of performance and experiences among Companies with the mission to improve the relationship with their Customers through multimedia channels) and BSD (Italian company focused on research and Interaction Design) launched a survey on AI in Customer Management Processes. The goal was to understand how AI is used to create value in Customer Management processes, exploring the current and future trends and the most relevant issues in AI adoption. Results showed that companies are focusing not only on technological issues but also on the relationship between human beings and organizations, facing interaction design issues and User Experience topics.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Customer Management</kwd>
        <kwd>Artificial Intelligence</kwd>
        <kwd>User-Centered Design</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        According to McKinsey “Global Survey on Artificial Intelligence”, organizations are
using AI solutions to increase value [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. According to the survey, this could lead to an
“AI divide” between companies that are already in an advanced phase of adoption and
production and the players that are not even ready for gathering value from AI. In
both cases, “AI Leaders” and “AI Followers” still have a “long way to go”.
Additionally, more than a half of respondents said that they applied AI solutions at least in
one function and the functional areas particularly involved in AI programs are
Product-Service Operations, Marketing and Sales.
      </p>
      <p>
        The measurement of value in Customer Management Processes can be managed
through specific KPIs, such as revenue increase, costs reduction, Lead Management
results, quality and satisfaction, churn prevention, Customer Effort Score and Net
Promoter Score. Customer Management Processes include front line and back office
tasks and are producing and processing millions of multichannel digital data and
interactions, which foster AI solutions essential for optimizing performances and services.
CCW Report “AI Trends Affecting the Contact Center” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] presents specific AI use
cases, including automatic replies to customers’ queries, balancing Human
Interactions and Digital Touches, Robotic Process Automation tools to perform specific
tasks, speech analytics for training and improvement (Voice of Customer Programs for
example), intelligent Chatbots, VocalBots and Virtual Assistants, recommendation
systems for specific situations where cookies and customer histories can suggest
specific products or behavior.
      </p>
      <p>Starting from this context, the CMMC Club (Customer Management Multimedia
Competence Club) and BSD (Italian research and interaction design company) in
early 2021 launched an online survey on AI in Customer Management Processes. The
first hypothesis was that AI is increasing value in Customer Management Processes
and it is giving to human intelligence and to human beings more power. The research
started from the consideration that AI solutions are not reducing occupation and that
AI tools are reducing people workload, taking care of massive and real-time data
processing, repetitive low value added tasks and risky tasks for people cognitive and
emotional working life, including agents, salesmen, data scientists, REPs, clerk
employees, supervisors and managers. The goal of the survey was to understand how
AI is currently used to create value in Customer Management processes by addressing
the main solutions in place, the current and future trends and the most relevant issues
to be considered in AI adoption when managing AI programs and projects.
1.1.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Background</title>
      <p>
        According to research promoted by Accenture [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], the adoption of Conversational
Agents (chatbots, avatars and robots) can increase the return on investment of the
companies with a minimal effort and investment. For example, chatbots are
considered preferable over other methods of brand communication, such as email, live chat or
social media because they could be potentially always active and available all the
time. Conversational agents are defined as software programs which interpret and
respond to statements made by users in ordinary natural language [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] based on
different technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML) and
Natural Language Processing (NLP). Among the others, chatbots are Conversational
agents which hold text-based or spoken conversations (also using facial expressions
and gestures) with humans. They could also present themselves as a virtual person,
animal, object or abstract entity. Despite their potential benefits, users are reluctant to
engage with them. Chatbots usually disappoint users' expectations because people
think of chatbots primarily as answering machines and they get frustrated when they
can't get answers to simple questions. Moreover, recent studies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] explain that
chatbots' identity influences how we perceive and interact with chatbots especially for
their characteristics, such as: conversational intelligence (chatbot’s ability to manage
user interactions); personification (chatbot’s identity and personality); interactive style
(regarding how users are expected to interact with the chatbot, e.g. voice, text or
button); appropriate task type (what type of tasks users expect the chatbot to support) and
trustworthiness (how users trust the chatbot to support them in a useful way).
      </p>
      <p>
        These aspects related to chatbots personality could have a positive or negative
influence on the perception of the company, which lead companies to address
challenges related to chatbot!s identity and interactive style:
Conversations with Chatbots are Generally Perceived as Unnatural and
Impersonal. Implementing an engaging, “human-like” communication style that reflects the
attributes of human communication, for example by using an informal language and
establishing a conversational dialogue. Many researchers have investigated how
relational outcomes are affected by the implementation of human-like communicative
behaviors (e.g. the use of body movements, humor or communication style) in
conversational agents [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Absence of a Specific Identity Affects User Experience, User Expectations and</title>
      <p>
        Interactions. Chatbots with anthropomorphic characteristics (meaning the attribution
of personality or human characteristics to something non-human) affects the user
experience and plays an important role in the user's decision-making process (e.g. using
or not chatbots). Anthropomorphism facilitates the social interaction between user and
machine and creates a socially engaging chatbot [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        When Robots Look More Human, Our Sense of Familiarity Increases Until
Arriving at a Valley, "the Uncanny Valley". Masahiro Mori argues that as robots
become more human-like, people find them more acceptable and attractive than their
mechanical counterparts. But when robots take on a very close human aspect, people
develop a sense of discomfort and repulsion. The definition of more realistic elements
(e.g. color of the skin, legs, etc.) increases the sense of familiarity, but only up to a
certain point, after which humans feel rejection towards robots [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Many Chatbots Have Been "Discontinued" Because Don’t Perform a Proper</title>
      <p>
        Interaction with Users. Causes are generally related to: a gap between user
expectations and chatbot performance; the inability to deliver engaging and compelling
conversations and to maintain conversations appropriate to the context of the
conversation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        There is a Gender Bias in Chatbot Design: Most Chatbots are Female. People
perceive computers as social actors and treat them as real social entities [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
Therefore the trend towards gender stereotypes (deeply rooted in human psychology) is also
extending to machines and chatbots. For example, most voice-based Conversational
agents are designed to be “female exclusively or female by default” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. This bias is
particularly evident in customer service and sales. The chatbot gender is also
influenced by the sector: for instance, the technology sector has a great number of men, so
chatbots are often male [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ].
2.
2.1.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Method</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Participants</title>
      <p>A specific questionnaire has been created to explore main issues related to AI in
Customer Management. 30 companies responded to the questionnaire (one unique
survey for each company filled out by main directors and decision makers in AI
programs of Customer Management): 76,7% companies involved with more than 250
employees, representing different service sectors, including telco, media and financial
services.
2.2.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Procedure</title>
      <p>
        Participants were invited to complete an online questionnaire [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ]. The survey was
conducted in February 2021 and the items of research covered the processes and
activities in which AI solutions are adopted, the level of investment in Euros, the
responsible and involved units, the roles affected and the main trends for the next years
within a period split into “current”, “within one year”, “within three years” in order to
tackle with current reality and future perspective. A specific section has been
dedicated to Usability and Design topics.
3.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>Results</title>
        <p>The main scientific results of the survey entailed an interest in companies to invest in
AI projects and that are focusing not only on technological issues but also on the
relationship between human beings and AI solutions, such as chatbots. Based on the
research results, the main innovation regards the opportunity to enhance the value of AI
in Customer Management, by addressing a design perspective which includes
technological and system integration domains.</p>
        <p>Involved Processes. Participants declared a strong investment in AI programs: more
than 30% of respondents are investing between 50K and 100K Euros and more than
20% invested more than 500K Euros in 2021. Figure 1 illustrates the processes and
services interested in AI solutions today (past investments), within one year (current
investment) and in the next three years (future investment). Information management,
post sales support and data analysis are the most relevant activities affected nowadays
by AI, according to past investments, whether within three years, AI will be applied to
document analysis, claims management and lead management. Indeed, respondents
say that in the future the main investments in AI for Customer Management will be
committed to Document analysis processes (capability to read and manage
documents, including text and pictures), qualitative features able to handle complaints or
complex situations and lead management strategies.</p>
        <p>AI Investments Scope. Figure 2 provides an overview of the investments in AI,
which cover different activities: software development and maintenance/assistance is the
most relevant area of work, but “tuning” and “change management” are gathering a
lot of attention and energy. This scenario confirms that AI solutions are not a stage of
maturity to be considered as “plug&amp;play” solutions but require effort in terms of
people involvement, tuning and configuration of machine learning algorithms and system
training (supervised learning and reinforcement learning).
AI Solutions. One of the most relevant solutions adopted by survey participants is the
chatbot that takes care of the user’s requests via chat and voice channels. A few
survey respondents say that chatbots are already performing complex tasks (10% of
respondents). On the contrary, 40% of participants believe that a chatbot will never be
able to carry out articulated activities. Moreover, 43% of respondents say that in the
next three years, the maturity of AI solutions will upgrade chatbots enabling them in
managing complex processes and tasks.</p>
        <p>The management of complex operations is related to the capability of an AI tool to
perform “Situational Analysis” tasks by rebuilding historical data and context
overview for any single request. Respondents say that in the next three years AI will be
able to perfectly perform Situational Analysis (56,7%) and 16,7% say that today this
is already possible with their existing technologies.</p>
        <p>Visual Appearance. Maturity and acceptance of AI solutions is also affected by
visual and interaction issues, such as the chatbot identity. Most of the companies face a
dilemma between creating an agent with the appearance of a robot or similar to a real
person. Respondents have different perspectives: 30% of them say that in the future
chatbots will not be similar to human beings, whether 20% believe that chatbots
already have a human-like visual identity, e.g. physical aspect, gestures, name, clothes,
tone and communication style.</p>
        <p>Humans-Chatbots Interactions. Furthermore, more than 50% of respondents say
that users are still perceiving the interactions with chatbots “unnatural” and
“unsatisfactory”. This led to a consideration that despite the level of investment and attention
given to AI solutions there still are some open points and question marks affecting
final users, especially citizens or customers.
4.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-2">
        <title>Design Approach</title>
        <p>According to the results of the research, the respondents were involved in an online
campaign aimed at improving the awareness related to the chatbot identity design. .In
the following, we present the design approach to chatbot identity definition and
interaction strategy based on 5 steps:
Defining the Context and the Scope. Defining the scope and the perimeter of
chatbot answers. The user must have a clear understanding of the inputs that the chatbot
will expect to receive in order to perform its tasks and don't create false expectations.
Companies need to make decisions about where to apply chatbots in order to get the
greatest return and integrate bots with the human workforce. In the next future, the
collaboration between people and AI will lead companies to provide users with
customized experiences, products and services, boosting efficiency and productivity.
Defining Chatbot Identity. In order to create an empathic human-machine
interaction, a detailed study of the appearance and personality of the bot is essential for
keeping the user engaged and satisfied with the overall experience. Companies should
design the chatbot appearance (e.g. human-like or a robot style), the feelings and
expectations to arouse in the user (e.g. trustworthiness). Additional characteristics
regard the name and the visual aspect of the chatbot, that should be consistent with
personality and interaction style.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Defining Language and Tone of Conversation. In order to establish a trusted rela</title>
      <p>tionship between user and chatbot, it should be important defining the chatbot
language style, fostering a reassuring and professional conversational tone, according to
the target audience. However, technical language could complicate communication:
promoting linguistic clarity is important to reduce users' misunderstanding.
Defining Conversation Management. In order to keep the user's attention, it’s
important to define a maximum number of characters per message, avoiding too many
scrolls while reading. Using conversational markers to provide the user with an
indication of the conversation status and feedback about chatbot request understanding
(e.g. sequence indicators such as "First" , "Finally" or feedback related to the
interaction "I got it", "Okay" and "Great Job”).</p>
      <p>Defining Interaction Strategies. Human-chatbot interaction moves on different
levels during the conversation: it is necessary to identify the most appropriate strategies
according to the request and status of interaction. This approach, such as alternating
free text fields with the selection of predefined answers, keeps the user engaged in the
conversation. Consider some flexibility in interacting with the bot, allowing people to
jump back and forth in the linear flow of the conversation.
5.</p>
      <sec id="sec-7-1">
        <title>Conclusions</title>
        <p>AI solutions in Customer Management processes are becoming a strategic path for
increasing value: revenues increase, cost reduction and service capabilities
enlargement over multiple channels. Data processing as well as AI-based interaction
solutions are focusing attention and investments. Despite an overall improvement of
technological features, AI solutions still have a long run to do: AI programs require
adoption and change management processes and require investments into design tasks,
starting from a User-Centered Perspective.</p>
        <p>The need to design interaction strategies leads to the goal to define proper context
and scope of AI tools, including working on the chatbots!"identity, such as visual
appearance, gender issues and user engagement. Interactions require defining the
boundaries and the integration between human-based tasks and automated tasks.. In order
to make AI investments in Customer Management Processes effective and valuable,
teams must include strategic, organizational, technological and design skills, starting
from a design perspective, even involving final users in conceptualization, testing and
prototyping, taking care of their input and feedback.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Balakrishnan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chui</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hall</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Henke</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The state of AI in 2020</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>McKinsey Global Survey</article-title>
          . Published. https://www.mckinsey.
          <article-title>com/business-functions/mckinseyanalytics/our-insights/global-survey-the-state-of-ai-in-2020</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Segal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ).
          <article-title>AI Trends Affecting the Contact Center</article-title>
          , Customer Contact Week,
          <year>September 2021</year>
          ,
          <source>Proceedings of the CCW Las Vegas Conference of December 2021</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3. Accenture Research. (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Chatbots are here to stay</article-title>
          . https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/pdf-77/accenture-research
          <article-title>-conversational-ai-platforms</article-title>
          .pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4. Chatbots.org, https://www.chatbots.org/conversational_agent/, last accessed
          <year>2021</year>
          /10/12
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>McAllister</surname>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          et al. (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>Towards Chatbots to Support Bibliotherapy Preparation and Delivery</article-title>
          . In:
          <article-title>Følstad A</article-title>
          . et al. (eds) Chatbot Research and Design.
          <source>CONVERSATIONS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science</source>
          , vol
          <volume>11970</volume>
          . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-
          <fpage>030</fpage>
          -39540-
          <issue>7</issue>
          _
          <fpage>9</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liebrecht</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hooijdonk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Creating Humanlike Chatbots: What Chatbot Developers Could Learn from Webcare Employees in Adopting a Conversational Human Voice</article-title>
          .
          <source>Chatbot Research and Design Lecture Notes in Computer Science</source>
          ,
          <volume>51</volume>
          -
          <fpage>64</fpage>
          . https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
          <fpage>030</fpage>
          -39540-
          <issue>7</issue>
          _
          <fpage>4</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Catania</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Beccaluva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garzotto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The Conversational Agent “Emoty” Perceived by People with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Is It a Human or a Machine?</article-title>
          <source>Chatbot Research and Design Lecture Notes in Computer Science</source>
          ,
          <volume>65</volume>
          -
          <fpage>78</fpage>
          . https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-
          <fpage>030</fpage>
          -39540-
          <issue>7</issue>
          _
          <fpage>5</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mori</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The Uncanny Valley</article-title>
          .
          <source>The Monster Theory Reader</source>
          ,
          <fpage>89</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>94</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/ 10.5749/j.ctvtv937f.
          <fpage>7</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kvale</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sell</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hodnebrog</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Følstad</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Improving Conversations: Lessons Learnt from Manual Analysis of Chatbot Dialogues. Chatbot Research and Design L e c t u r e N o t e s i n C o m p u t e r S c i e n c e , 1 8 7 - 2 0 0</article-title>
          . h t t p s : / / d o i .
          <source>o r g / 10</source>
          .1007/978-3-
          <fpage>030</fpage>
          -39540-7_
          <fpage>13</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nass</surname>
            , Clifford &amp; Steuer, Jonathan &amp; Siminoff,
            <given-names>Ellen.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1994</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Computer are social actors</article-title>
          .
          <source>Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 204. 10.1145/259963</source>
          .260288
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>West</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kraut</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ei Chew</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>I'd blush if I could: closing gender divides in digital skills through education</article-title>
          .
          <source>UNESCO</source>
          . https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/ pf0000367416.page=1
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Feine</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gnewuch</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Morana</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maedche</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Gender Bias in Chatbot Design</article-title>
          .
          <source>Chatbot Research and Design Lecture Notes in Computer Science</source>
          ,
          <volume>79</volume>
          -
          <fpage>93</fpage>
          . https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
          <fpage>030</fpage>
          -39540-
          <issue>7</issue>
          _
          <fpage>6</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>L'Intelligenza Artificiale nel Customer Management</surname>
          </string-name>
          , https://forms.gle/bmgBbvGqV2pbpDAP8 last accessed
          <year>2021</year>
          /10/12
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>