<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Context Coverage in “Quality in Use Model”</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Shin'ichi fukuzumi</string-name>
          <email>Shin-ichi.fukuzumi@riken.jp</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project Tokyo</institution>
          ,
          <country country="JP">Japan</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>-In ISO/IEC 25010, Quality in Use is mainly focused to the use of operators who interact with product and system directly. However, as workstyle using ICT (Information Communication Technology) product, system or service has been changed, object of quality in use are also changed to not only direct users with simple direct interaction but also many stakeholders and society which are influence on indirectly by someone use the product, system and service. When the concept of quality in use has changed, the issue about dealing with previous quality characteristics occurred. This paper focuses on context coverage which is one of quality characteristics in previous quality in use model and discuss the position of this characteristic. As proposal, this characteristic shall be removed because context is prerequisite for “use”. And as another proposal, this characteristic should be moved to product quality because coverage can be represented as a specification. (Abstract)</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>- usability</kwd>
        <kwd>software engineer</kwd>
        <kwd>quality in use</kwd>
        <kwd>context coverage</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>
        Importance of usability has been considered in not only
ergonomics area but also software engineering area[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
Quality model in SQuaRE (System and software Quality
Requirement and Evaluation) series which are dealt with in
ISO/IEC JTC1SC7 defined effectiveness, efficiency,
satisfaction freedom from risk and context coverage as
elements of “Quality in Use”[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. Figure 1 shows the Quality
in Use model defined in ISO/IEC 25010.
      </p>
      <p>
        In this figure, effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction,
freedom from risk and context coverage are quality
characteristics of Quality in Use Model defined in ISO/IEC
25010[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        On the other hand, ISO 9241-11: 2018[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] which is one of
human-system interaction standards in ergonomics area
describes the concept of usability shown in Figure 2. As
usability definition is “extent to which a system, product or
service can be used by specified users to achieve specified
goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a
specified context of use” in this standard, this figure explains
that outcome of “use” under identified context of use is
usability which elements are effectiveness, efficiency and
satisfaction. In this figure, “use” is emphasized.
Comparing these two figures, it turns out that there are
common elements, i.e., effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction.
As describes above, usability is parts of outcome of “use”, it
can be found that Quality in Use model is also focused on
“use”, that is direct interaction. In case of this, freedom from
risk means influence on economy and health by using and
context coverage means whether product, system or service
can be used or not under initially explicitly identified context
of use.
      </p>
      <p>II.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>CONTEXT COVERAGE</title>
      <p>Recently, as workstyle using ICT (Information
Communication Technology) product, system or service has
been changed, object of quality in use shall be included not
only simple direct interaction but also many stakeholders and
society which are influence on indirectly by someone use the
Copyright © 2021 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
product, system and service. That is, ICT product, system or
service users are not only direct users who interacts system
and product directly but also indirect user who use output
obtained by using ICT product, system or service. When
object of quality in use is wider, the model has to be changed.</p>
      <p>Figure 3 shows the proposal quality in use model which
expanded object range.</p>
      <p>
        This proposal model covers almost quality characteristics/
subcharacteristics defined in previous model [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. However,
only context coverage does not appear. The reason describes
below.
      </p>
      <p>In ISO/IEC 25010, “context coverage” is defined as
follows,</p>
      <p>“degree to which a product or system can be used with
effectiveness, efficiency, freedom from risk and satisfaction
in both specified contexts of use and in contexts beyond those
initially explicitly identified”.</p>
      <p>And this quality characteristics has two subcharacteristics.</p>
      <p>Their titles and definitions are as follows,
- context completeness: degree to which a product or
system can be used with effectiveness, efficiency,
freedom from risk and satisfaction in all the specified
contexts of use
- flexibility: degree to which a product or system can be
used with effectiveness, efficiency, freedom from risk
and satisfaction in contexts beyond those initially
specified in the requirement
From these definitions, context coverage means whether
target ICT product, system or service can be used or not under
assumed context of use.
Figure 4 shows the imagine of context coverage, that is, the
relationship between assumed all context of use (N) and each
context of use which really can be used. In this figure, case 3
and case X are context which really cannot be used. So,
degree of context coverage is (N-2)/N. However, as proposed
quality in use model is focuses on affect and influence by use,
contexts which can not be used are out of target. This means
that assumed contexts are prerequisite. If context changes and
target ICT product, system or service could not be used,
quality in use could not be discussed because “use” is a
prerequisite in quality in use. When considering “use”, a
context of use is predefined. So, when context changes, the
context is predefined context of use.</p>
      <p>III.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>FUTURE DISCUSSION</title>
      <p>Though context coverage does not include in the new
proposal quality in use model, its concept is important for
previous model users. To solve this issue, one idea is to add
this quality characteristic to product quality model. Whether
ICT product, system or service can be used under assumed
context or not is dependent on their specification. So, context
coverage can be one of quality characteristics or
subcharacteristics in product quality.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fukuzumi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hirasawa</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wada</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Komiyama</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and Azuma:,
          <string-name>
            <surname>T.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Proposal of Quality in Use in software Quality, Human-cimputer Interaction design and user experience</article-title>
          ,
          <fpage>pp431</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>438</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2] ISO/IEC 25010:
          <article-title>Systems and software engineering -Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - System and software quality, 2011</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <fpage>ISO9241</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>11</lpage>
          :
          <article-title>Ergonomics of human-system interaction -Part11: Usability for definition and concept (</article-title>
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fukuzumi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wada</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Noriko: :
          <article-title>Quality in Use -Case Study for Evaluation-</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Human-Computer Interaction</surname>
            . Theory, Methods and Tools, Thematic Area,
            <given-names>HCI</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2021</year>
          ,
          <article-title>Held as Part of the 23rd HCI International Conference</article-title>
          , HCII 2021,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Virtual</given-names>
            <surname>Event</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>July 24-29</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          , Proceedings,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Part</surname>
            <given-names>I</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Editors: Kurosu, Masaaki (Ed.) pp.
          <fpage>343</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>350</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>