<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>ReSmart-15 : An Information Gain based Questionnaire for Early Dementia Detection</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Hyeseong Park</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Myung Won Raymond Jung</string-name>
          <email>rjung@akaintelligence.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ji-Hye Kim</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Uran Oh</string-name>
          <email>uran.oh@ewha.ac.kr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>AKA Cognitive Corp.</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Seoul</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="KR">South Korea</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Seoul</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="KR">South Korea</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Department of Family Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Seoul</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="KR">South Korea</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>To build an efective questionnaire for detecting early dementia, we propose ReSmart-15 which is a dementia detection questionnaire that includes daily behavior-based questions in five categories (i.e., attention (3Q), spatial ability (3Q), spatiotemporal ability (3Q), memory (3Q), and thinking ability (3Q)). As for the evaluation, we first collected responses from two diferent screening tests with 87 participants. Then we used a machine learning method called "information gain" ranking to show the efectiveness of ReSmart-15 compared to another representative screening test. As a result, we found that the top 2 questions were from ReSmart-15, and 60 percent of ReSmart-15 questions were in the top 10.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;early dementia</kwd>
        <kwd>questionnaire</kwd>
        <kwd>information gain</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        selection through information gain to rank the
importance of all features and then filter out the low-ranking
Existing screening tools for dementia have several lim- features. In information gain, each question in the
quesitations. For example, Mini-Mental State Examination tionnaire was treated as a feature when it had diferent
(MMSE) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], one of the widely used tests for measuring importance in the prediction of a dementia diagnosis. In
the clinical dementia rating scale (CDR) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], is insensitive the same way, we computed the information gain to see
to detecting the early stages of dementia [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], especially if ReSmart-15 is ranked higher than NMD-12 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. The
for highly educated individuals [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4 ref5">4, 5</xref>
        ]. results show that most questions in ReSmart-15 were
      </p>
      <p>
        Using a screening test with low specificity could lead to ranked higher than the NMD-12 questionnaire. This
sugan incorrect diagnosis of dementia in elderly individuals. gests that ReSmart-15 was composed of influential
quesTherefore, SED-11Q [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] aimed to investigate the state of tions filtered by information gain, which may increase
daily activities performed in various aspects by including the accuracy of the early diagnosis of dementia.
questions that dealt with social interactions and
personality. In this study, inspired by the SED-11Q, we propose
a questionnaire named ReSmart-15 by modifying the ex- 2. Method
isting MMSE questionnaire for better detection of early
dementia. The questionnaire consists of daily behavior- We collected audiences from SurveyMonkey2 to recruit
based questions in five categories (i.e., attention (3Q), 87 participants (53 female) excluding four who dropped
spatial ability (3Q), spatiotemporal ability (3Q), memory out. Their average age was 38.0 (=13.4, range=18-65).
(3Q), and thinking ability (3Q)), which are explained by To show the efectiveness of ReSmart-15 compared to
anCogniFit1 which designed cognitive assessment through other existing screening questionnaire for early dementia
monitoring the patient’s cognitive rehabilitation process detection, we conducted a user study where participants
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. were asked to submit their responses to 27 diferent
ques
      </p>
      <p>
        As for the evaluation, we collected responses from tions: 15 questions from ReSmart-15 and 12 questions
87 participants who were asked to answer 27 questions from NMD-12 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. It took 4 minutes and 25 seconds on
from two diferent screening tests for dementia, ReSmart- average to complete the task.
15 and NMD-12 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. NMD-12 uses automated feature
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>3. Evaluation</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>To evaluate the importance of the questions in ReSmart</title>
        <p>
          15 compared to NMD-12, where it uses the information
gain (IG) ranking in machine learning [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ]. Let () be
an entropy, and () be the amount of information to
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2https://www.surveymonkey.com/</title>
        <p>4. Findings and Future Work
make an exact classification based on the partition by
questions , where  is the data sample in the training
set. Then, () and () can be calculated as follows: The purpose of this experiment was to select influential
questions based on a machine learning technique called
 information gain. This technique treats each question
() = − ∑︁  log2(), as a feature and each of them has a diferent level of
=1 importance in the prediction of a dementia diagnosis.</p>
        <p>
          As shown in Table 1, our experiment found that the top
() = − ∑=︁1 |||| × ( ), 2ReqSumesatrito-1n5s qwueersetiofrnosmwRereeSminatrht-e1t5o,pa1n0d. 6T0hipsesrucgegnetsotsf
that ReSmart-15 was composed of influential questions
where  is the number of classes,  is the probability ifltered by information gain, which may increase the
that an arbitrary tuple in  belongs to class , and  is accuracy of the early diagnosis of dementia. Furthermore,
the number of distinct values in . In this study, we make information gain can be used to remove redundant or
total two classes where each class represents whether unnecessary features with low importance (i.e.,
ReSmartthe user is in early dementia or not, which makes  = 2. 13 and ReSmart-6), and can simplify the procedure of
Also, each questionnaire in ReSmart-15 and NMD-12 can diagnosis.
only be answered by either yes or no, which makes  = 2. In the next experiment, to make our social robot as a
For simplicity, we diagnose early dementia when the health care device, we would like to examine whether
number of "yes" answers is 14 or more, i.e., more than the questions with the high impact selected by the
mahalf of the total 27 questions. IG of each questionnaire  chine learning the technique is likely to be more efective
can be calculated by the diference between () and with a conversational voice-based interactive chatbot
in(). terface where it is known to have several benefits. It
has the potential to act as a doctor for people with
de• Today, let’s improve memory!
• What is the date today?
mentia by providing deep learning chat and awareness
combination of information. It helps users [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ] to drive
conversations with users rather than simple Q&amp;A
services, and to ease technical barriers and build intimacy.
        </p>
        <p>We would like to experiment with a conversational
voicebased user interface called Musio 3 as shown in Figure 1.</p>
        <p>
          It is deployed with Muse, which has a natural language
processing (NLP) engine. Musio introduces himself at
ifrst and asks the questions (ReSmart-15) in a
conversational format and we expect that Musio will relieve
the users’ burden of testing their cognitive abilities by
providing a user interface with a familiar voice [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ].
23 24 25 26
• (The user solves the problem)
        </p>
        <p>• Yes, you did well.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Cockrell</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Folstein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Mini-mental state examination, Principles and practice of geriatric psychiatry (</article-title>
          <year>2002</year>
          )
          <fpage>140</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>141</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Morris</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The clinical dementia rating (CDR): Current version and</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Young</source>
          <volume>41</volume>
          (
          <year>1991</year>
          )
          <fpage>1588</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1592</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Lawrence</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Davidof</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Katt-Lloyd</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Auerbach</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Hennen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A pilot program of improved methods for community-based screening for dementia</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry</source>
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
          <fpage>205</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>211</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Lorentz</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Scanlan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Borson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Brief screening tests for dementia</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry</source>
          <volume>47</volume>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
          <fpage>723</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>733</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Espino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Lichtenstein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Palmer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Hazuda</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Evaluation of the mini-mental state examination's internal consistency in a communitybased sample of mexican-american and europeanamerican elders: results from the san antonio longitudinal study of aging</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</source>
          <volume>52</volume>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
          <fpage>822</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>827</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Maki</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Yamaguchi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Yamaguchi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Symptoms of early dementia-11 questionnaire (sed-11q): a brief informant-operated screening for dementia, Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra 3 (</article-title>
          <year>2013</year>
          )
          <fpage>131</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>142</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Jung</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Son</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Park</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S. Kim,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Wijaya</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Resmart:
          <article-title>Brain training games for enhancing cognitive health</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Advances in Computer Vision and Computational Biology</source>
          , Springer,
          <year>2021</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>331</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>337</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.-Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Chiu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Tang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , C.-Y. Wei,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.-U. Hung,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Nmd-12:
          <article-title>A new machine-learning derived screening instrument to detect mild cognitive impairment and dementia</article-title>
          ,
          <source>PloS one 14</source>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <article-title>e0213430</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.-L. Liu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.-R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A pilot tool of the virtual scenario initial dementia cognitive screening (vsidcs) with a cultural exhibition for improving the standard traditional test</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Healthcare</source>
          , volume
          <volume>9</volume>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Multidisciplinary</given-names>
            <surname>Digital</surname>
          </string-name>
          Publishing Institute,
          <year>2021</year>
          , p.
          <fpage>1160</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Gweon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Comparing data from chatbot and web surveys: Efects of platform and conversational style on survey response quality</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>12</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>