=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-3132/Paper_4 |storemode=property |title=Applying the Neural Network Technologies for Cyclohexane Industrial Oxidation Data Analysis |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3132/Paper_4.pdf |volume=Vol-3132 |authors=Sergiy Zagorodnyuk,Bohdan Sus,Oleksandr Bauzha,Taras Chaikivskyi |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/iti2/ZagorodnyukSBC21 }} ==Applying the Neural Network Technologies for Cyclohexane Industrial Oxidation Data Analysis== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3132/Paper_4.pdf
Applying the Neural Network Technologies for Cyclohexane
Industrial Oxidation Data Analysis
Sergiy Zagorodnyuk a, Bohdan Sus a, Oleksandr Bauzha a and Taras Chaikivskyi b
a
    Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv 01033, Ukraine
b
    Lviv Polytechnic National University, Bandera Str, 12, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine

                Abstract
                An algorithm for digital processing of data of chemical reactions of liquid-phase oxidation of
                substances is developed. Such reactions make it possible to obtain valuable oxygen-
                containing compounds on an industrial scale. The intelligent scheme of the algorithm is based
                on a multilayer neural network. Qualitative modeling of the influence of the primary
                concentration of reagents on the dynamics of the flow and the result of the catalysis reaction
                is carried out. The simulation results were analyzed using an artificial neural network for
                various catalysts and reagents, including cyclohexane hydroperoxide, cyclohexanol,
                cyclohexanone, acids and esters. After training, the neural network with high accuracy
                reproduces the data from a sample of experiments used during training. It also predicts the
                results of the study in extended time ranges, as well as with higher values of concentrations
                of catalytic impurities. Formulated and substantiated predictions allow experimenters to
                choose the most optimal and promising set of concentrations of active catalytic substances.

                Keywords 1
                Neural Network, Hydroperoxide, Activation Functions, Catalyst

1. Introduction
    The study of oxidation processes using organic compounds is a complex and multifaceted
scientific task. As a result of the oxidation reaction, many chemical compounds are formed. Therefore
the determination of their chemical characteristics requires an analysis of the effect of different
catalysts on the rate of formation of reaction products and the percentage of use of starting materials-
reagents. Since the starting materials can be catalysts that have already formed as a result of the
oxidation reaction, the reaction time, the oxidation temperature, the formation of reaction products are
often unpredictable. Various mathematical and physical mechanisms are used to process and structure
the original data and predict the result. In this article, to solve this problem, it is suggested to use
artificial neural networks. At present, the scope of neural networks covers many areas of science and
technology. Widespread use of neural networks in medicine [1-4], biology [5, 6], chemistry [7],
physics [8], energy [9], engineering [10, 11] and environmental protection has been demonstrated [12,
13]. Machine learning is a powerful tool for solving complex multidimensional problems, where the
answers are not obvious and cannot be determined by simple mathematical algorithms. Powerful
artificial intelligence techniques are increasingly used to develop forecasting models in financial
markets [14, 15], in the fields of agro-industrial casting [16], in the oil industry [17]. Neural networks
are also used in the field of metrology, production control and logistics, quality management, ensuring
a high level of safety and efficiency [18].
    Most processes of liquid-phase oxidation of hydrocarbons occur in the presence of homogeneous
catalysts, which can be salts of metals with variable valence. The influence of homogeneous catalysts


Information Technology and Implementation (IT&I-2021), December 01–03, 2021, Kyiv, Ukraine
EMAIL: szagorodniuk@gmail.com (Sergiy Zagorodnyuk); bnsuse@gmail.com (Bohdan Sus); asb@univ.kiev.ua (Oleksandr Bauzha);
taras.v.chaikivskyi@lpnu.ua (Taras Chaikivskyi)
ORCID: 0000-0003-3415-7746 (Sergiy Zagorodnyuk); 0000-0002-2566-5530 (Bohdan Sus); 0000-0002-4920-0631 (Oleksandr Bauzha);
0000-0002-1166-8749 (Taras Chaikivskyi)
           © 2022 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
           Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
           CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)



                                                                                                                       39
on the liquid-phase oxidation of organic substances is connected simultaneously with the selective
acceleration or deceleration of individual elementary reactions, as well as with the generation of new
sequences of chemical transformations. Variable valence metals are involved in almost all elementary
stages of the process - nucleation, continuation, degenerate branching and chain breakage [19,20],
which determines their influence on the speed and selectivity of the oxidation process, and
characterizes metals such as selective catalysts of the chainless process. The chemical reaction of
liquid-phase homogeneous-catalytic oxidation of cyclohexane with molecular oxygen is used as an
industrial method for obtaining oxygen-containing compounds with important specific properties.
Such compounds include, in particular, cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone, which are intermediates in
the production of synthetic fibers - nylon and nylon 6 [21].
   Figure 1 shows the chemical scheme of liquid-phase oxidation of cyclohexane to cyclohexanol and
cyclohexane to cyclohexanon. It can be seen from the scheme of cyclohexane under the action of
catalysts and oxygen is converted into cyclohexyl hydroperoxide. As a result of the subsequent
reaction of the mixture and the introduction of hydrogen ions into the chemical reaction leads to the
formation of cyclohexanol (CHl) and cyclohexanone (CHn).




   Figure 1: Chemical scheme of liquid-phase oxidation of cyclohexane to cyclohexanol and
cyclohexanone.

    The main oxidation products of cyclohexane are cyclohexyl hydroperoxide (HPCH) and adipic
acid. At low-intensity conversions of cyclohexane, cyclohexane hydroperoxide decomposes by
monomolecular reaction or interaction with the original hydrocarbon. Instead, studies have shown that
with increasing conversion of the starting hydrocarbon and the appearance of a significant amount of
oxygen-containing compounds, alternative ways of consuming cyclohexane hydroperoxide appear.
Degenerate branching occurs due to the interaction of cyclohexane hydroperoxide with ketones,
alcohols, or acids [22].
    Current catalyst systems demonstrate low efficiency, which does not reduce the oxidation of
cyclohexane at high rates of conversion of raw materials. Low conversion values have significant
energy losses associated with the processing of excess unreacted raw materials. Increasing the
selectivity and conversion of the process by at least 1% (abs.) can significantly reduce the cost factors
for raw materials and energy consumed. Therefore, the topical issue is the formulation of efficient
catalytic systems for the process of homogeneous catalytic oxidation of cyclohexane. The
hydrocarbon oxidation reactions occur with greater selectivity by a chainless mechanism in the
coordination sphere of a homogeneous catalyst. The use of additives of different nature (electron
donor and electron acceptor) to cobalt naphthenate (NC) salt allows to increase the selectivity of the
process relative to the target products and change the ratio between them in the right direction [19,22-
23], which determines the direction of further use of such additives. The article analyzes the effect of
crown esters, which, according to literature sources, form ionic associations with metal ions and,
accordingly, can form the dynamics of the oxidation reaction. The main oxidation products of
cyclohexane are cyclohexyl hydroperoxide and adipic acid. At low-intensity conversions of
cyclohexane, cyclohexane hydroperoxide decomposes by monomolecular reaction or interaction with
the original hydrocarbon. Instead, studies have shown that with the increasing conversion of the
starting hydrocarbon and the appearance of a significant amount of oxygen-containing compounds,
alternative ways of consuming cyclohexane hydroperoxide appear. Degenerate branching occurs due
to the interaction of cyclohexane hydroperoxide with ketones, alcohols, or acids [22].
    The scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that for the first time a specific neural network
was used to analyze experimental data. That full-layer multilayer neural network has 3 hidden layers

                                                                                                          40
with 20 neurons. As result the efficiency of determining the effect of crown-ester additives has
increased significantly due to mathematical predictions of the ratio of oxidation products depending
on the conversion of cyclohexane, temperature and the ratio of cobalt naphthenate additives. It was
demonstrated that the value of the dependent variable can be predicted more accurately if the forecast
takes into account only the important features and basic characteristics that provide a description of
the chemical analysis.

2. First level heading
   As a result of several experiments, many data related to the oxidation process of cyclohexane were
obtained. Table 1 shows the experimental data of the oxidation of cyclohexane three T = 423K, using
the catalyst NC and catalytic systems NC - 15-KR-5 and NC - DBKR, where K is the percentage of
cyclohexane that reacted.

Table 1
The composition of the products of catalytic oxidation of cyclohexane. [NC]= 510-4 mol per litre,
[NC]/[additive] = 5/1
  Additive       t,           К,                                Selectivity,%
                min.           %          HPCH          CHl         CHn          Acids        Esters
     -           15           3,0         16,8          31,4         16,8         16,4         18,6
  15-KR-5        10           2,8         12,9          27,8         18,6         17,9         22,8
   DBKR          15           3,5         13,3          28,8         14,6          8,9         34,4
     -           20           6,7          6,1          36,5         21,7         15,8         19,9
  15-KR-5        20           7,9          4,3          35,7         23,0         17,2         19,8
   DBKR          25           8,0          3,8          33,4         23,8         15,5         23,5
     -           35          12,9          0,8          27,3         26,5         22,6         22,8
  15-KR-5        35          12,9          1,6          26,5         25,5         20,9         25,5
   DBKR          40          12,5          0,6          21,6         26,8         26,7         24,3

    As can be seen from Table 1, the change in the concentration of substances formed (as a result of
complex oxidation reactions of cyclohexane) does not have a simple pattern of growth over time.
Complex changes in the concentration of the obtained substances occur during changes of the other
parameters of the experiment (catalyst concentration, or additive concentration, temperature change).
Due to the complexity of the problem, it was decided to use the possibilities of artificial neural
networks.
    The neural network was trained with a fragment of the received experimental data set. The inputs
of the neural network include the initial concentration of HPCH, CHl, CHn, acids and esters (inputs 1-
5). At such inputs of the neural network, the values of the concentrations of the substances are
obtained as a result of the reaction. The values are conveniently normalized to the maximum value of
the concentration observed at any time in a real experiment. The sixth input of the neural network is
the concentration of cyclohexane (the percentage of cyclohexane involved in the initial moment of the
reaction). Inputs 7-8 were, respectively, the concentrations of impurities in the industrial catalyst of
cobalt naphthenate (NC). Inputs 7 and 8 were fed normalized values of additives 15-KR-5 and
DBKR, respectively. Therefore, the maximum value of additives at inputs 7-8 is 5×10-4 mol / l, which
at the corresponding input corresponds to the value 1. Input 9 is the reaction time normalized to a
maximum time of 100 minutes, which did not exceed the sampling time of experimental data. Finally,
the inlet 10 inlet is the temperature at which the reaction takes place. The experimental data do not
have a large temperature variation, so most experiments were performed at an average temperature of
T = 413K. This value is taken as a value of 0.5, and therefore a change in temperature leads to slight
fluctuations from this given value. In particular, the temperature T = 403K is assigned a value of 0.4
input 10, and the temperature T = 423K - a value of 0.6 of the same input, respectively.

                                                                                                       41
    The concentration values of HPCH, CHl, CHn, acids and esters are the outputs of the system
(outputs 1-5). These values are obtained at the end of the experiment or in the middle. Output 6
reflects the concentration of cyclohexane, i.e. the percentage of unused cyclohexane.
    Single-layer neural networks are unable to solve this problem due to the problem of linear
resolution. Therefore, the natural solution to this problem was the use of multilayer, fully connected
artificial neural network. Direct propagation artificial neural network with multiple hidden layers is
capable of recognizing dependencies of arbitrary shape. In addition, in the case of linearity of
activation functions, the multilayer neural network can be reduced to an equivalent single-layer.
Therefore, the formation of such structures makes sense only in the case of application of nonlinear
activation functions in neurons. Therefore, the sigmoidal logical function was chosen [24]. as the
most mathematically simple of the nonlinear.

                                                    
                                            f ( x)  1  e  x   
                                                                 1
                                                                                                     (1)
    Full-layer multilayer networks provide the ability to transfer information from each neuron in the
previous layer to any neuron in the next. Thus, the unidirectionality of connections leads to the
construction of exclusively hierarchical structures in which information processing is distributed by
levels. Each level of hierarchical information processing is responsible for its layer of neurons. The
choice of the number of hidden layers and the number of neurons in them is a problem of balance
between the speed of learning the neural network and the complexity of the effects that can describe
(learn) this network. In this paper, we did not research the balance between learning speed and
sufficient system complexity. We took 3 hidden layers with 20 neurons each. This network has an
overfitted model. However, our task is to process the experimental data and not to optimize the neural
network for that task, and this model is overfitted to increase the experimental sample. Training from
precedents is based on the use of a sequence of samples that specify the desired values of the output
vectors of the neural network for the corresponding values of the input vectors. The mechanism of
learning with the teacher is to modify the weights of neurons. The main criterion for evaluating the
effectiveness of training is the target function or the error of the output vector, which presents a
functional description of the model output that coincides with the ideal for a given input sample. In
particular, the article uses the standard deviation:


                                                                  
                                                                      2
                                          1 N
                                      E          W x ( i )  y ( i ) .                             (2)
                                         2 N i 1

    Where N is the number of pairs "input vector / output vector" in the training set; x (i) , y (i ) the
values of the pair "input vector / output vector"; W is an approximating function.
    The paper uses the gradient descent method to find the minimum of the objective function. The
idea of the gradient descent method is to sequentially change the parameters of the artificial neural
network in the direction that reduces the objective function E. Since function E is differentiable for
each of the parameters, it is possible to calculate the gradient vector. Moving in the direction of the
negative gradient for each of the parameters, we find the local minima of the objective function.
    Fig. 2 presents a diagram of the algorithm for the training of artificial neural networks. In this
system, W is the matrix weight of the artificial neural network, t is the number of the iteration step, η
is the learning factor, ε is the definition of the change in the objective function at which the learning
process is stopped. The gradient descent method has a high stability, which provides slight
fluctuations of the modulus of the objective function under the condition of changing the nature of the
input data. But the low rate of convergence necessitates a significant amount of time to train artificial
neural network. The main parameter that affects the rate of convergence of the gradient descent
algorithm is the training factor η. As described above, the input layer of the neural network contains
10 input neurons. The values of the signals of the input layer are normalized to 1. The neural network
contains 3 hidden layers, including 20 neurons. The original layer is represented by 6 neurons. Fig. 3
presents the structure of the neutron network. The number of neurons in the layers of this neural
network can be changed. The process of learning the neural network takes place within 1000 epochs.

                                                                                                      42
    In fig. 4. the user interface of the neural network calculation program is demonstrated. The "New
system" button starts the process of setting up the user's new neural network. During setup, the user
can set the number of input neurons, output neurons, and the number of neurons in each of the three
intermediate layers. The “Set I / O”, “Save I / O”, “Set Value” and “File I / O” buttons define the
frames - vectors of input and output neurons. The "Train" button directly starts the neural network
learning process. The "Empty Weights" button sets for the training weight Wij starting random
position. The "Initialize Weights" button changes the scale of training and forms a point of local
minimum error in the system. In the upper left corner are the values of the input and output neurons in
the current frame.




   Figure 2: Gradient descent algorithm




   Figure 3: Multilayer neural network


                                                                                                    43
Figure 4: Graphical user interface of the neural network

3. Measured data forecast
    The complete training process of the neural network is shown in Fig. 4. The graph of error changes
is presented below. The dependence of the concentration of cyclohexanol formed as a result of the
experiment is shown in fig. 5.




                          0.60
                          0.50
                           0.40
                           0.30                                              433
                            0.20                                            423
                            0.10
                             0.00                                       413
                                    0
                                        10                             403
                                             20
                                                  30
                                                       40             393
                                                            50
                                                                 60
   Figure 5: Dependence Density of cyclohexanol (normalized value), which is formed during the
reaction from the time (minutes) and temperature(0K) reaction (with no additives)


                                                                                                   44
     According to forecasts, it will not be formed as a result of training on a sample set of experimental
data. As can be observed from Figure 5, temperature significantly affects the rate of formation of
cyclohexanol. If at T =4230K there is a rapid formation of increase in the cyclohexanol. After 20
minutes of reaction, the dependence is on saturation. Decreasing the temperature significantly slows
down the reaction rate. The amount of experimental data is modest. However, they are sufficient to
predict these dependencies by the means of a neural network.
    By making this prediction, experimenters can focus their efforts on obtaining the most promising
and effective control. Data obtained after the experiment should be used for extra training of the
artificial neural network. It is clear from the fig. 6 that as a result of training the neural network
reproduces data from a sample set of experiments with high accuracy.
                           0.12

                           0.10

                           0.08

                           0.06

                           0.04

                           0.02

                           0.00                                                   a
                                  0     20         40      60        80         100

                          0.30
                          0.25
                          0.20
                          0.15
                          0.10
                          0.05
                          0.00                                                    b
                                  0           20            40             60

                          0.60
                          0.50
                          0.40
                          0.30
                          0.20
                          0.10
                          0.00                                                    c
                                  0           20            40             60
   Figure 6:     Comparison dependencies Density of cyclohexanol occasionally experimental data
(red line) and examined (provided) neural network-blue lines (in the absence of additives). a - is the
reaction temperature 4030K, b - is the reaction temperature 4130K, c is the reaction temperature
4230K

   It predicts the result of the experiment in the time ranges when the measurements have not yet
been carried out.
   Figures 5, 7 show that the use of additives 15-KR-5 (at a concentration of 1×10-4 mol / l.) leads to
the more rapid formation of cyclohexanol at high temperatures. Using the same additive DBKR (at
the same concentration of 1×10-4 mol / l) it does not lead to a more rapid formation of cyclohexanol.

                                                                                                       45
                                                      0.60
                                                      0.50
                                                      0.40
                                                       0.30
                                                       0.20                                      423
                                                       0.10
                                                        0.00
                                                               0                                408
                                                                   10 20
                                                                            30 40              393
                                                                                     50
                                                                                          60
Figure 7: Dependence of the density of the cyclohexanol (normalized value) formed during the
reaction on time (Minutes) and temperature (0K) reactions. a - concentration of the additive 15-KR-
5- 1x10-4 mol / l., b - concentration of the additive DBKR – 1x10-4 mol / l
0.21
                                                    0.12
0.18
                                                    0.10
0.15
                                                    0.08
0.12
0.09                                                0.06
0.06                                                0.04
0.03                                                0.02
                                                a                                                           b
0.00                                                0.00
        0    20        40    60      80     100            0        20          40    60        80     100



 0.30                                               0.40
 0.25
                                                    0.30
 0.20
 0.15                                               0.20
 0.10
                                                    0.10
 0.05
                                                c   0.00
                                                                                                             d
 0.00
        0         20           40          60              0               20             40           60


0.50
                                                    0.40
0.40

0.30                                                0.30

0.20                                                0.20

0.10                                                0.10

0.00
                                                e   0.00                                                     f
        0         20          40           60              0               20             40           60

Figure 8: Comparison of the dependences of cyclohexanol density on the time of experimental data
(red lines) and predicted by the neural network-blue lines. a, c, e - concentration of the additive 15-
KR-5- 1×10-4 mol / l., b, d, f - concentration of the additive DBKR - 1×10-4 mol / l, a, b - reaction
temperature 4030K, c, d - reaction temperature 4130K, e, f - reaction temperature 4230K



                                                                                                             46
   The increase in the concentration of formed cyclohexanol does not stop with time and continues to
grow. As follows from Fig. 8, the introduction of different impurities in different ways affects the rate
and concentration of cyclohexanol formation in the chemical reaction. Therefore, the trained neural
network accurately reproduces the sample data from the experiment and predicts the result of the
measurement in new time ranges and with new values of impurity concentrations.
   The dependence of the concentration of cyclohexanone obtained as a result of the experiment is
presented in Fig. 9.




                          0.60
                          0.50                                                                  433
                           0.40
                           0.30
                           0.20                                                                423
                            0.10
                            0.00
                                                                                           413
                                   0 5
                                         10 15                                            403
                                                 20 25
                                                         30 35
                                                                 40 45                   393
                                                                         50 55                            a
                                                                                 60 65




                            0.60
                            0.50
                             0.40                                                              433
                             0.30
                              0.20                                                         423
                              0.10
                              0.00                                                        413
                                     0
                                          10                                             403
                                                 20
                                                         30
                                                                 40                  393
                                                                      50                              с
                                                                             60
Figure 9:        Dependence of the cyclohexanone density (normalized value) formed during the
reaction on time (Minutes) and on the temperature (0K) of the reaction. a - in the absence of
additives , b -concentration of the additive 15-KR-5- 1x10-4 mol / l., c - concentration of the additive
DBKR – 1x10-4 mol / l.


                                                                                                              47
    According to forecasts, it should not be formed as a result of training on a sample set of
experimental data. According to forecasts, it will not be formed as a result of training on a sample set
of experimental data.
    Additives used in the oxidation of cyclohexane significantly affect the course of the reaction. As
can be observed from Figure 9, the addition of additives 15-KR-5 and DBKR leads to an increase in
the rate and concentration of cyclohexanone as a result of oxidation of cyclohexane. However, if the
addition of 15-KR-5 leads to an increase in the rate of increase in the concentration of cyclohexanone
at low reaction times. The addition of DBKR makes changes in the rate of response to pain the next
time. As in the case of the formation of cyclohexanol (Fig. 5, 7), the temperature significantly affects
the reaction rate. Obviously, a neural network trained with a limited set of experimental data can
expand the range of data that an experimenter can receive. Instead, it should be taken into account that
the data predicted the neural network cannot be 100% reliable.

4. Conclusions

    The neural network can predict data that allow to determine areas for improvement of the catalysis
process, in particular, can allow a more dynamic process of oxidation of cyclohexane, at higher feed
rates. The proposed approach creates additional data for preliminary analysis of the catalysis process
and identification of its components, as well as reduces the cost of raw materials and energy. It is
shown that only important features should be taken into account during forecasting, then the exact
dependence of the variable is well predicted, allows to reduce the time and resources required to
prepare experiments. It is desirable to use the neural network to expand the range of available
calculated data based on an experiment with a limited set of data. Each subsequent experiment
increases the range of data for the training of the neural network, which can increase the efficiency of
the oxidation of cyclohexane.

5. References

[1] D. Clymer et al., “Decidual Vasculopathy Identification in Whole Slide Images Using
    Multiresolution Hierarchical Convolutional Neural Networks,” The American Journal of
    Pathology, vol. 190, no. 10, pp. 2111–2122, Oct. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.06.014.
[2] R. C. Deo, “Machine Learning in Medicine,” Circulation, vol. 132, no. 20, pp. 1920–1930, Nov.
    2015, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593.
[3] M. Schwyzer et al., “Automated detection of lung cancer at ultralow dose PET/CT by deep
    neural networks – Initial results,” Lung Cancer, vol. 126, pp. 170–173, Dec. 2018, doi:
    10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.11.001.
[4] T. J. Brinker et al., “Deep neural networks are superior to dermatologists in melanoma image
    classification,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 119, pp. 11–17, Sep. 2019, doi:
    10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.023.
[5] F. Chen, H. Li, Z. Xu, S. Hou, and D. Yang, “User-friendly optimization approach of fed-batch
    fermentation conditions for the production of iturin A using artificial neural networks and
    support vector machine,” Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 273–280, Jul.
    2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.05.001.
[6] M. Haesemeyer, A. F. Schier, and F. Engert, “Convergent Temperature Representations in
    Artificial and Biological Neural Networks,” Neuron, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 1123-1134.e6, Sep.
    2019, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.003.
[7] H. Li, Z. Zhang, and Z. Liu, “Application of Artificial Neural Networks for Catalysis: A
    Review,” Catalysts, vol. 7, no. 10, p. 306, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.3390/catal7100306.
[8] Y.-F. Shen, R. Pokharel, T. J. Nizolek, A. Kumar, and T. Lookman, “Convolutional neural
    network-based method for real-time orientation indexing of measured electron backscatter



                                                                                                     48
     diffraction patterns,” Acta Materialia, vol. 170, pp. 118–131, May 2019, doi:
     10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.026.
[9] Z. Liu, H. Li, X. Tang, X. Zhang, F. Lin, and K. Cheng, “Extreme learning machine: a new
     alternative for measuring heat collection rate and heat loss coefficient of water-in-glass
     evacuated tube solar water heaters,” SpringerPlus, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 626, Dec. 2016, doi:
     10.1186/s40064-016-2242-1.
[10] J. Acquarelli, T. van Laarhoven, J. Gerretzen, T. N. Tran, L. M. C. Buydens, and E. Marchiori,
     “Convolutional neural networks for vibrational spectroscopic data analysis,” Analytica Chimica
     Acta, vol. 954, pp. 22–31, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.12.010.
[11] T. Chaikivskyi, B. Sus, O. Bauzha, S. Zagorodnyuk, “Multicomponent analyzer of volatile
     compounds characterization based on artificial neural networks,” CMIS-2020, CEUR Workshop
     Proceedings, vol. 2608, p. 819-831.
[12] Z. Liu, H. Li, and G. Cao, “Quick Estimation Model for the Concentration of Indoor Airborne
     Culturable Bacteria: An Application of Machine Learning,” IJERPH, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 857, Jul.
     2017, doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080857.
[13] K. Zeng and Y. Wang, “A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Oil Spill Detection from
     Spaceborne SAR Images,” Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 1015, Mar. 2020, doi:
     10.3390/rs12061015.
[14] M. Tkáč and R. Verner, “Artificial neural networks in business: Two decades of research,”
     Applied Soft Computing, vol. 38, pp. 788–804, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.09.040.
[15] X. Zhong and D. Enke, “Predicting the daily return direction of the stock market using hybrid
     machine learning algorithms,” Financ Innov, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 24, Dec. 2019, doi:
     10.1186/s40854-019-0138-0.
[16] S. Haider et al., “LSTM Neural Network Based Forecasting Model for Wheat Production in
     Pakistan,” Agronomy, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 72, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3390/agronomy9020072.
[17] Ahmed, Ali, Elkatatny, and Abdulraheem, “New Artificial Neural Networks Model for
     Predicting Rate of Penetration in Deep Shale Formation,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 22, p. 6527,
     Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11226527.
[18] A. Rácz-Szabó, T. Ruppert, L. Bántay, A. Löcklin, L. Jakab, and J. Abonyi, “Real-Time
     Locating System in Production Management,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 23, p. 6766, Nov. 2020, doi:
     10.3390/s20236766.
[19] S. Mudryy, V. Reutskyy, O. Ivashchuk, O. Suprun, and V. Ivasiv, “Influence of Organic
     Additives on Catalysts of Liquid-Phase Cyclohexane Oxidation,” ChChT, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 37–
     42, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.23939/chcht09.01.037.
[20] I. Graça and D. Chadwick, “NH4-exchanged zeolites: Unexpected catalysts for cyclohexane
     selective oxidation,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 294, p. 109873, Mar. 2020,
     doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109873.
[21] R. Jevtic, P. A. Ramachandran, and M. P. Dudukovic, “Effect of Oxygen on Cyclohexane
     Oxidation: A Stirred Tank Study,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 48, no. 17, pp. 7986–7993, Sep.
     2009, doi: 10.1021/ie900093q.
[22] Y. Melnyk, V. Reutskyy, and S. Melnyk, “Catalytic oxidation of cyclohexane in the presence of
     substances that affect on the surface tension,” CTAS, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 57–62, Nov. 2018, doi:
     10.23939/ctas2018.02.057.
[23] O. Ivashchuk, V. Reutskyy, S. Mudryy, O. Zaichenko, and N. Mitina, “Cyclohexane Oxidation
     in the Presence of Variable Valency Metals Chelates,” ChChT, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 339–343, Sep.
     2012, doi: 10.23939/chcht06.03.339.
[24] L. Tarassenko, “Mathematical background for neural computing,” in Guide to Neural Computing
     Applications, Elsevier, 1998, pp. 5–35. doi: 10.1016/B978-034070589-6/50002-6.
[25] P. Werbos and P. John, “Beyond regression : new tools for prediction and analysis in the
     behavioral sciences /,” Jan. 1974.




                                                                                                    49