<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Image Schema Day 2022</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Maria M. Hedblom</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Mariedal, Jönköping University</institution>
          ,
          <country country="SE">Sweden</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>The Sixth Image Schema Day (ISD6), March 24–25, 2022, Jönköping University, Sweden
© 2022 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
CPWrEooUrckResehdoinpgs IhStpN:/c1e6u1r3-w-0s.o7r3g CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>The Image Schema Day Workshop Series</title>
      <p>For decades, the theory of image schemas has connected researchers from many scientific
disciplines under one central idea: the notion that the body’s sensorimotor experiences are
captured into abstract, mental patterns used for understanding and reasoning. Often referred to
as spatiotemporal relationships, image schemas construct the conceptual spaces for concepts
related to notions like Containment, Source_Path_Goal and Blockage.</p>
      <p>These kinds of patterns are studied for many purposes. Psychologists look at how such
patterns are used in our thinking and behaviour. Linguists study how these patterns manifest in
our language and other expressions. Designers and artists look at how such patterns influence
design choices and our interpretations of particular constellations. Formal image schema
research, for instance in AI and robotics, looks instead at how such patterns can be used to
solve symbol grounding problems between formal representations and real-world objects.</p>
      <p>It is both a strength and a weakness that image schemas are studied from so many diferent
directions. On the one hand, it showcases and underlines the relevance and importance of this
theoretical framework and provides a substantial research foundation as these patterns are
investigated with varying methodologies. On the other hand, it has led to a terminological
abundance and various diferences in viewpoints, which can make it harder to reach mutual
goals and engage in collaborative eforts. To rectify this situation, The Image Schema Day (ISD)
workshop series was introduced to provide a cross-disciplinary platform for researchers with
diferent areas of expertise to facilitate communication, mutual respect and understanding for
diferent viewpoints, and to encourage joint research endeavours.</p>
      <p>Due to its repeated success, the workshops in this series have been held already five times
prior to Jönköping. Each time hosted by the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy, either as
an event by invitation, or as a scientific workshop with paper submissions and anonymous
peer review. The past two editions of ISD were held as part of the joint workshop conference
TriCoLore: Creativity, Cognition and Computation (see https://tricolore.inf.unibz.it).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>The Sixth Image Schema Day (ISD6)</title>
      <p>After having been a yearly workshop series, the Sixth Image Schema Day was forced to be
postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Between 24–25th of March 2022 it was once again
possible to physically gather and The Sixth Image Schema Day was held in the beautiful 1850’s
Villa Mariedal, Jönköping University’s conference venue.</p>
      <p>The workshop got 17 submissions, of which three abstracts were accepted for presentation
at the conference and nine submissions were accepted for publication in the proceedings,
summarised and listed below.</p>
      <p>For the abstract presentations, Wylecioł presented a comparative analysis on the [GO TO +
preposition] construal from a multi-lingual perspective. Baur presented work on how a research
through design approach can be guided by use of physical artefacts based on image schemas.
Stufano Melone presented an analysis on how architectural choices often are driven by image
schema-based spatial reasoning.</p>
      <p>The papers in this volume, span the full range of image schema investigations with
research ranging from the interpretation of visuo-linguistic manifestations to research on formal
representation and applications. Within this range, Huber presented work on how air trafic
controllers’ language and visualisations are heavily based on image-schematic metaphors.
Thiering presented joint work with Mittleberg on a study looking at how the impossible situations
found in the computer game ‘Antichamber’ are directly connected to image-schematic notions.
Hurtienne’s paper, presented by Baur, introduced the audience to the ISCAT database, an open
source dictionary for image-schematic notions used in inferface design.</p>
      <p>Bourou presented formal work on how Hasse diagrams can be analysed using image-schematic
reasoning for sense-making. Hedblom presented a first view of the Diagrammatic Image Schema
Language DISL as a more structured method to be used to visualise image-schematic
manifestations in either language or conceptualisations. Pomarlan and Righetti presented formal
robotics research of how object properties should be functional descriptions based on what their
involved image schemas allow for. Tsiogkas presented research on how an integration of image
schemas could help guide robotic actions in an industrial setting. Finally, Dhanabalachandran’s
research, presented by Hedblom, contains preliminary work on how it is possible to use image
schemas in robotic action descriptions for the case of stacking objects.</p>
      <p>Contributions</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Accepted abstracts for presentation</title>
      <p>In addition to the accepted papers in this volume, the workshop featured three talks based on
abstracts accepted for presentation.</p>
      <p>• Ryszard Wylecioł.</p>
      <p>Conceptualisation of the [GO TO + PREPOSITION] construal. Short analysis of
diferences between Italian, Spanish and French
• Cordula Baur, Carolin Wienrich and Jörn Hurtienne.</p>
      <p>Form Follows Mental Models: Instantiating Image Schemas as Physical Artifacts using a
Research Through Design Approach
• Maria Rosaria Stufano Melone, Stefano Borgo and Oliver Kutz.</p>
      <p>Image Schemas and Ontology in Architectural Rules</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Accepted papers</title>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>Presented in the order of the proceedings.</title>
        <p>• Stefano De Giorgis, Aldo Gangemi and Dagmar Gromann.</p>
        <p>The Racing Mind and the Path of Love: automatic extraction of image schematic triggers
in knowledge graphs generated from natural language
• Stephan Huber, Patrick Schulz, Eric Hauke and Jörn Hurtienne.</p>
        <p>Image Schematic Metaphors in Air Trafic Controllers’ Language
• Martin Thiering and Irene Mittelberg.</p>
        <p>Image and Force Schemas Interacting in Digital Environments: The Computer Game
‘Antichamber’
• Jörn Hurtienne, Stephan Huber and Cordula Baur.</p>
        <p>Supporting User Interface Design with Image Schemas: The ISCAT Database as a Research
Tool
• Dimitra Bourou, Marco Schorlemmer and Enric Plaza.</p>
        <p>Embodied sense-making of diagrams as blending with image schemas
• Maria M. Hedblom and Fabian Neuhaus.</p>
        <p>Visualising Image Schemas: A Preliminary Look at the Diagrammatic Image Schema
Language (DISL)
• Mihai Pomarlan, Guendalina Righetti and John Bateman.</p>
        <p>It Is What It Tends to Do: Defining Qualitative Parameter Regions by Their Efects on
Physical Behavior
• Nikolaos Tsiogkas.</p>
        <p>Using image schemata to support autonomous assembly tasks
• Kaviya Dhanabalachandran, Maria M. Hedblom and Michael Beetz.</p>
        <p>Getting On Top of Things: Towards Intelligent Robotic Object Stacking through
ImageSchematic Reasoning</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Workshop Chairs and Proceedings Editors</title>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>Maria M. Hedblom Oliver Kutz</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Program Committee</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Workshop Participants</title>
      <sec id="sec-8-1">
        <title>John Bateman</title>
        <p>Cordula Baur
Stefano Borgo
Dimitra A. Bourou
Stefano De Giorgis
Maria M. Hedblom
Oliver Kutz
Mihai Pomarlan
Guendalina Righetti
Marco Schorlemmer
Maria Rosaria Stufano Melone
He Tan
Martin Thiering
Nikolaos Tsiogkas
Ryszard Wylecioł</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-2">
        <title>Jönköping University, Sweden Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-3">
        <title>Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan</title>
        <p>The Institute for Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italy
Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, IIIA-CSIC, Spain
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
University of Coimbra, Portugal
Universitat Jaume, Spain
Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Germany
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
University of Bremen, Germany
University of Leeds, UK
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy
Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, IIIA-CSIC, Spain
University College Dublin, Ireland
University of Florence, Italy</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>