<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Mastering Computer Linguistics for the Designation of Risks in Cooperation Communications</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nataliya Vnukova</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Daria Davydenko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Serhii Hlibko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Valeria Shorokh</string-name>
          <email>shorokhv2021@ukr.net</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>National Scientific Center «Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute» of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Zolochivska street 8a, Kharkiv, 61177</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Scientific and Research Institute of Providing Legal Framework for the Innovative Development of National Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Chernyshevska street 80, Kharkiv, 61002</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Nauky Avenue 9-A, Kharkiv,61166</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>77, Pushkinska street, office 91, 61024 Kharkiv</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Google Trends is a popular computational linguistics tool designed to determine and analyze the range of public interests, taking into account the linguistic features of the formation of Internet queries. In this paper, it is proposed to use the Google Trends service to determine the risks of cooperative ties between industrial enterprises of the Kharkiv and Zaporizhia regions, which are already leaders in industry clustering in Ukraine. The information base of the study was the groups of enterprises, which were determined by the analysis of the hierarchy of cooperation relations. An analysis of the names of enterprises in the group using Google Trends made it possible to determine the demand for their products by region, which made it possible to assess the state of their promising cooperation. In this aspect, a list of clustering risks is defined, a relative assessment of indicators according to the linguistic features of the formation of scales including. The work carried out an experiment with Kharkіv enterprises, which made it possible to make a decision on cooperation with certain institutions, taking into account the processing of qualitative indicators by using linguistic information. Thus, the scientific novelty of the paper is the technology of processing quality information with widespread use of methods of using linguistic information, which is important for the formation of prerequisites for decision-making in economics was developed by the authors.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>1 Computational Linguistics</kwd>
        <kwd>Google Trends</kwd>
        <kwd>Risk of Cooperation</kwd>
        <kwd>Matrix</kwd>
        <kwd>Interaction</kwd>
        <kwd>Partnership</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Computational linguistics is a relatively new field of knowledge in linguistics, designed to create
automated systems for processing textual information for the purpose of its recognition, translation,
etc. One of the tasks is to build knowledge management systems, which involves the implications of
expert systems to achieve the result of solving an individual problem of natural language processing
through mathematical models and artificial intelligence tools. The primary mission of computational
linguistics is due to the need to create and improve the linguistic support of information processing
systems. The results of the analysis of requests and messages underlying the communication of users
with intelligent automated information systems (AIS) can be used not only to achieve the goals of
linguistics, but also to process economic databases. AIS solves issues in the economy that require the
translation or analysis of language terms, processing the level of interest in these definitions according
to certain criteria for belonging to a region, for example, key words and annotations formed using
Google, Lingvo and other automatic translators are essential structural elements of an economic
article. Computational linguistics is a means of expanding the tools for analyzing economic processes
that are dynamically changing in the modern unstable environment of economic development in the
country. In the context of the economic crisis caused by epidemiological and political world
phenomena, the issue of combating economic risks that have led to a deterioration in the activities of
enterprises is becoming increasingly important. Linguistics has the ability to solve the problem of
analyzing the real economic situation by determining the current social directions of the country's
development. To confirm the priority of this issue in society, a search has begun for ways to
overcome risks for enterprises and to analyze the prevailing opinion on this topic in the aspect of the
country's regions using Google Trends.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Analysis of publications</title>
      <p>The presented topic is not new for modern scientists, moreover, the number of interested people is
constantly growing. So, in 2020, O. Kliuiev [2] with a team of authors developed a successful startup
investment model, using in his research the results of interest in the terms “innovation”, “business
incubator” in various speech variations. In turn, in 2021, N. Vnukova and S. Achkasova [3] came to
the conclusion about the seasonality of interest in financial risk by studying the level of interest in the
definition of "forensic" and "risk control" in Google Trends, taking into account discrepancies in time
and in dynamics. Also, the results of a study by V. Shmatkov and S. Hlibko [4] are interesting
regarding the difference between the concepts of "copyright" and "intellectual property" in the
framework of the formation of digital user competence regarding the mechanism for indemnification
and the use of results for risk assessment. V. Vysotska [5] dealt with web analytics, including those
generated by means of Google Trends, considered e-commerce issues based on the search for relevant
information through keywords on the topic based on the feedback activity of the audience. That is, the
practice of using Google Trends tools to solve the problems of economic science exists and is widely
represented in the studies of modern scientists.</p>
      <p>Publication activity on enterprise risk issues is substantiated by the real state of economic
development, which is reflected in the publications of young authors. So, M. Klimchuk [6] developed
an adaptive model for countering the risks of business processes of alternative energy enterprises and
formed a matrix for the distribution of risk zones for it. Y. Shvets [7] analyzed the methods for
assessing the risk of industrial enterprises in order to determine the feasibility of their use in the
activities of institutions. The topic of enterprise risk assessment is also relevant in foreign studies. For
example, A. Hayes [8] considers all the features of risk assessment of modern American enterprises
and ways to overcome it. In addition, P. Avila [9] draws attention to the need to assess the risk of
collaborative enterprises in order to improve existing models in Portugal. Thus, modern domestic and
foreign studies of determining the risk of enterprises are focused on the process of its assessment and
methods of prevention. Meanwhile, there are almost no proposals on how to overcome the risks of
enterprises, taking into account the means of computational linguistics, so it is proposed to study this
issue in more detail using Google tools on the example of Ukrainian enterprises.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Database of enterprises for the study of cooperation ties</title>
      <p>In times of unstable development of the financial sector in Ukraine, filled with risks for specific
enterprises, a collaborative approach to industrial management that meets the principles of the state
policy of the country and the European directions for the development of innovations in its economy
is becoming increasingly important. Many industry experts note cooperation as a possible means of
overcoming crisis phenomena in the activities of organizations [10]. Cooperation is the association of
enterprises to achieve a common goal based on beneficial interaction and consensus. In Ukraine, this
idea is actively promoted, which is reflected in the concept of creating clusters by the industrial
community of Kharkiv and Zaporizhzha in 2020 [11, 12]. The main mission of these clusters was to
establish a partnership between the members of the association in order to strengthen internal
interaction with each other and their entry into the international market. In 2021, by order of the
German society GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH), which
supports cluster cooperation in Ukraine, industry experts conducted a study of enterprises in the two
regions represented on the possibility of strengthening ties and expanding the circle of cluster
members. The authors propose an expert method for analyzing hierarchies [13] as a key research
method, based on the structuring of relationships between subjects and their priorities for cooperation.
In the constructed hierarchies, the first level symbolizes the high state of potential interaction between
enterprises. The opinion of experts was collected through an online Google Form survey of
representatives of industry enterprises using the Kharkiv region as an example. The results of the
study (fragmentary) are shown in Figure 1.
4 levels are occupied by those enterprises that have prospects for clustering. Enterprise No. 28
“Kommunar Corporation” has all chance to become an active member of the EAM cluster
(Engineering, Automation, Mechanical Engineering) through a system of interaction with
organizations that already have the opportunity to use the prospects of association through
cooperation with other enterprises. The constructed structure makes it possible to determine the
directions for expanding the cluster by attracting more promising organizations that are ready for
internal cooperation. The depicted hierarchy is difficult to perceive due to the chaotic nature of the
directions of interaction, but at the same time it is informative for the logistics system of further
attracting enterprises to internal association. A similar structure is observed in Zaporizhzhia (Figure
2).
28. Kommunar Corporation
3. FED
39. AV metal group
8. ROSS
38. Ukrenergoatom
10. Ukrainian weighing company
34. Velton Telecom
25. Motor Sich
12. Thermo-Engineering Ltd
35. PrivatBank
43. Metinvest
48. Raiffeisen Bank</p>
      <p>As can be seen from Fig. 2, the first 6 levels are occupied by those enterprises that have prospects
for clustering. Enterprise No. 25 “Motor Sich” has the necessary elements of interaction in the cluster,
which can enable productive cooperation between customers and suppliers. By involving active
enterprises of the first levels of the hierarchy in cooperation, it is possible to realize the prospects for
interaction between cluster members on the terms of benefits for everyone, which will not only
expand the list of participants, but also allow constructively increasing the level of dialogue between
them. It is necessary to assess the level of public interest in these enterprises in the regions. Google
Trends was used as one of the computational linguistics tools to complete the task.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Analysis of the level of interest in the names of promising cluster enterprises as a tool of computational linguistics Google Trends (method 1)</title>
      <p>Google Trends [14] is an Internet application that allows you to determine the frequency of search
queries (terms) in different parts of the world and in different languages. In addition, the application
allows the user to compare, analyze data over a period of time, search for non-obvious topics related
to the query. The application is a tool of computational linguistics, because it can be used to
determine the filtering of search results using punctuation. Google Trends search results are displayed
in interactive graphs that show the current situation of the top queries. This application helps users to
delve into scientific issues for free, collect large amounts of data and track any changes in the
dynamics of interest in the concepts. Unlike other software products, such as AWStats, Matomo,
which have similar functions, Google Trends has a simple interface and remains the most popular for
users in Ukraine.</p>
      <p>Google Trends algorithms are based on determining the ratio of the number of term requests to the
total number of queries on this concept. The obtained data are automatically translated into a
100point scale, which assigns the highest value of 100 and equates with it all other data, giving them
points from 0 to 99 [15, 16, 17]. It should be noted that Google does not display rare, single,
unpopular requests of one user in a short period of time. On the contrary, query statistics can provide
results for phrases that include words in any order or in combination with other words [18, 19]. Thus,
the capabilities of Google Trends and its functions make it possible to analyze the level of interest in
the regions previously obtained as priority enterprises for cooperation (see Fig. 1, 2).</p>
      <p>To determine the correspondence of the cooperative perspective to the modern public interests of
business, a study was conducted to compare certain subjects of Kharkіv with each other. The analysis
was carried out for three enterprises in the region in the last year (12 months). Search results in
Google Trends are shown in Figure 3.
As shown in Figure 3, the pre-defined cooperation links fully reflect the public Internet user
requests. “Kommunar Corporation”, “FED” are Kharkiv enterprises representing the level of interest
in the region in the proportion of 50/50, which demonstrates the demand for their activities by
location. In addition, the neighboring Dnipropetrovsk region and the capital city of Kyiv are
interested. “AV metal group”, identified as a promising cooperation partner for the cluster in the
region, really corresponds to such a mission, because the demand for its products covers 10 regions of
the country, which can be said about the existing partnerships between companies in these regions.
So, the group of enterprises represented reflects the real state of development of future prospects for
interaction between certain enterprises in Kharkiv.</p>
      <p>A similar study was conducted according to three enterprises in Zaporizhzhia (Figure 4).</p>
      <p>As can be seen from Figure 4, “Motor Sich” is a model of public interest in all regions of the
country, which reflects the prospects of partnership for such a company in the sectoral cluster.
“Metinvest” is most interested in Donetsk and Dnipropetrivsk regions. Instead, in the search space for
any variations of “Thermo-Engineering Ltd” is absent, which indicates inconsistency with the
requests of the companies themselves in the survey. Thus, it is doubtful to take into account
“ThermoEngineering Ltd” when forming cooperation prospects, because the lack of mentions in Google
Trends emphasizes the low level of interest in the company's products. Moreover, there are several
companies in Ukraine with a commercial name that includes the words "thermo" and "engineering",
and a significant number in the world. Cooperation in the event of such a discrepancy may create
additional risks in the formation of associations.</p>
      <p>The analysis of Google Trends made it possible to assess, using computational linguistics, the real
state of possible interaction for future cooperation based on the demand for the company's products in
the network, but this statistics does not guarantee the quality of the association, since it does not take
into account the risks of this process. To determine the qualitative indicators of cooperation and their
compliance with the results obtained, Google Trends suggests using a scoring matrix approach for
assessing the corresponding risk, which includes elements of linguistic scaling.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Risk components of joint relations of enterprises (method 2)</title>
      <p>To determine the criteria for assessing the risk of cooperative ties between enterprises, it is
necessary to consider the stages of the formation of a cluster structure that precede the merger. In the
scientific literature, said the risks of cooperation arise at the stages: choosing partners, planning and
implementing a cluster project, assessing the cluster synergy, making a decision to form a cluster.
Each stage is accompanied by risks inherent only in certain processes of interaction between the two
partners. In the study of O. Palyvoda [20] The system of certain risks within the presented clusters
(Table 1), requiring linguistic generalization in order to be further used in the processes of direct
evaluation of compounds. The list of risks is not exhaustive and can be constantly updated depending
on the current aspects of economic development, but any changes will not significantly affect the
logic of generalization.</p>
      <p>Specific risks
– the risk of – the risk of unilateral use of - the risk of collecting - risk of cluster
choosing partners cooperation; inaccurate information identification;
with incompatible - the risk of dependence on about the results of - risk of
business models; partners; cluster interaction; assessing the
– the risk of – the risk of losing technological - the risk of using specialization
misunderstanding innovations; inappropriate methods and prospects
the partners place – risk of loss of commercial for assessing the of the cluster;
and role in the information and organizational effectiveness of cluster - the risk of
cluster network; innovations; interaction; assessing the
– the risk of – risk of long-term decision- - lack of qualified existing
mismatch of moral making; analysts on cluster economic
values. – the inability to alternatively cooperation. conditions of
use the resources involved in the cluster;
the cluster project; - the risk of
– the risk of additional costs for finding
the organization of common
communications. interests.</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>Maximum negative risk</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>Risk of partnership</title>
        <p>incompatibility</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-3">
        <title>The risk of dependence on communication</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-4">
        <title>Risk of dishonesty</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-5">
        <title>Risk of lack of prospects for cluster development</title>
        <sec id="sec-5-5-1">
          <title>Source: summarized on the basis of [20] Thus, as can be seen from Table 1, all specific risks can be summarized according to the key direction of probable losses at the stages of cluster formation, which allows to characterize the criteria for further assessment, which underlies the scoring matrix approach to cooperative risk.</title>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Unified matrix approach to determining the probability of losses in the event of cooperative risk of the enterprise</title>
      <p>The unified matrix approach is a risk scoring method that takes into account not only the impact of
cooperative risks, but also the likelihood of such risks occurring if agreements between partners are
not fulfilled. In 2020, the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine approved the methodological manual
"Riskoriented planning of internal audit activities" [21], which actually provides recommendations for
assessing any risks of enterprises in probability and impact, taking into account linguistic means of
visualization. To achieve the objectives of the study, it is proposed to adapt the process of assessing
the cooperative risk to the conditions of this methodology. So, taking into account the criteria of
cooperation risk defined above, the level of its influence on the prospect of clustering (low, medium,
high and very high) is determined. This unified way, the level of risk is determined by assigning an
appropriate score to it (Table 2).</p>
      <p>As can be seen from Table 2, the discrepancy in the criteria makes it possible to assess the level of
impact of cooperation risk on the future partnership, thus presenting it in matrix form by assigning it
to a certain quadrant. For clarity of the matrix, it is proposed to supplement it with criteria for the
probability of occurrence of the risk of cooperative relations of enterprises. Since the level of risk
exposure is determined by 4 components, it is proposed to introduce 4 criteria (Table 3).</p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>The probability of occurrence is remote (25-50 %)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-2">
        <title>Probability of risk within 1-2 years (51-74 %)</title>
        <p>point
1
2</p>
        <p>As can be seen from Table 3, each level of probability meets certain criteria, which are assigned an
appropriate score, which allows you to adjust the previous estimate, which is presented in Table 2.
Overall risk assessment is determined by multiplying the impact assessment and probability estimate
as shown in the matrix Ministry of Finance of Ukraine [21] (Figure 5).</p>
        <p>As can be seen from Figure 5, risks from levels 1 to 4 are marked in blue and are considered "low"
(or acceptable), from levels 6 to 9 - "medium" risks (yellow), with levels from 12 to 16 - " high risks
"or" very high "(red and orange). This matrix approach allows for a two-level assessment of the
cooperation risk of enterprises, taking into account its impact and probability of occurrence for the
organization. Further, to test the effectiveness of the method, it is proposed to conduct a risk
assessment for pre-selected enterprises that are promising for cooperation and membership in existing
regional clusters.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>7. Risk assessment of cooperation relations of regional perspectives</title>
      <p>(experiment)</p>
      <p>Assessment of the impact and probability of assigning points can be done in different ways, but
each of them is based on an individual survey as a tool for collecting information. Thus, in order to
assess the risk of the priority Kommunar Corporation as enterprise of the potential cluster of Kharkiv,
an oral survey of representatives of the enterprise was conducted, the results of which are shown in
Table 4.</p>
      <sec id="sec-7-1">
        <title>Risk of partnership</title>
        <p>incompatibility</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-2">
        <title>Risk of dependence</title>
        <p>on communication</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-3">
        <title>Risk of dishonesty Risk of lack of prospects for cluster development</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-4">
        <title>Preliminary</title>
        <p>assessment of the
cooperation
confirms the good
faith intentions of
the contractors</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-5">
        <title>Perspective</title>
        <p>Kommunar Corporation
partners have identical
interests that can be
expressed in joint
projects, although the
economic conditions for
the development of
cooperation are
unstable</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-6">
        <title>The company has The partnership</title>
        <p>similar business does not provoke
models with the dependence, but
members of the cluster only creates
(Zaliznychavtomatika, additional
UKRDIPROVAZHMASH, opportunities for
etc.), they have the earnings for
same role in terms of Kommunar
importance at the level Corporation, resource
of state strategies outflow, including
financial will not
happen, because the
cooperation will be
carried out on the
terms of mutual
guarantees in the
cluster</p>
        <sec id="sec-7-6-1">
          <title>Source: compiled by the authors</title>
          <p>
            Low (
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
            )
The risk levels listed in Table 4 indicate the low impact of the criteria on the possible cooperation of
Kommunar Corporation with the members of the regional cluster. According to only one criterion, the
respondents had doubts about the smooth integration, which was reflected in the risk assessment
average. This score is associated with the unstable economic situation in the country, which provokes
additional risks of partner companies. The next step in the matrix approach, as already mentioned, is
to assess the probability of risk, which is presented in Table 5.
          </p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-7">
        <title>Risk of partnership incompatibility</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-8">
        <title>Unlikely (2)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-9">
        <title>Risk of dependence on communication Rare (1)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-10">
        <title>Risk of dishonesty</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-11">
        <title>Risk of lack of prospects for cluster development</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-12">
        <title>Possible (3)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-13">
        <title>Possible (3)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-14">
        <title>Source: compiled by the authors</title>
        <p>As can be seen from Table 5, the probability of occurrence of different evaluation criteria has a
discrepancy, covering the range from 1 point to 3. Opinions of experts in the survey coincide.
According to them, the most probable aspects that negatively affect cooperation may be the fleeting
economic conditions in the country and the dishonesty of partners in providing reliable information on
the results of cooperation.</p>
        <p>Thus, by multiplying the two tables 4 and 5 in pairs, you can determine the total number of points
by criteria and the quadrant of the matrix of risk assessment of cooperation (Table 6).</p>
        <p>As can be seen from Table 6, the overall assessment of the level of risk indicates the possible
cooperation of Kommunar with members of the Kharkiv regional cluster. Moreover, the low level of
3 of the 4 criteria suggests that cooperation is mutually beneficial for both Kommunar and their
promising partners. The only obstacle remains the unstable economic situation, which could
significantly change the course of the partnership. However, Kommunar's readiness to cluster under
such conditions is obvious, which allows further promotion of this idea to the media space of potential
participants in the cooperation.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>8. Conclusions</title>
      <p>The results of the assessment of the level of risk of cooperation of «Kommunar Corporation» with
promising partners of the Kharkiv regional cluster completely coincide with the conclusions on public
interest requests in Google Trends, which is a tool of computational linguistics that helps integrate
statistics to potential users. That is, we can conclude that Google Trends is a relevant tool for
assessing the interest in cooperation, which can reflect the main trends in the relevant industry
selected for analysis. The demand for certain requests characterizes the real-time state of affairs for
companies that aim to expand their own prospects for partnership.</p>
      <p>The results obtained to determine the risks of cooperative relations of enterprises were based on
the technology developed by the authors of processing quality information with widespread use of
methods of using linguistic information, which is important for forming the preconditions for
decision-making in the economy.</p>
      <p>The practical significance of this research lies in the developed approach and the actual experiment
based on multi-step transformations: using the online Google Forms for the survey, applying the
hierarchy method, determining interest in Google Trends tools, building linguistic scales, combining
the results of each step to confirm economic decision in the potential construction of cooperative ties
of the cluster at the regional level in the priority development zone of Industry 4.0 of the industrial
region of Ukraine.</p>
      <p>
        The developed technology in further research can be used to achieve the goals of computational
linguistics in terms of improving the processing of user requests on the Internet and to conduct a more
in-depth analysis of the terms that precede any research in economics. To more deeply determine the
state of enterprise cooperation, research can be scaled up by regions of Ukraine or in the global
European space. Also, to understand the place of each studied object in the risk zone and to determine
possible trends in the transition from one risk zone to another, it is possible to supplement the study
with similar calculations in the dynamics.
[4] D. Shmatkov, S. Hlibko, K. Tokarieva, J. Cachón Zagalaz, On the question of why copyright
cannot be synonymous with intellectual property within digital competence frameworks, On the
question of why copyright cannot be synonymous with intellectual property within digital
competence frameworks. Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial, 32 (2021) 215–231. doi:
https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n32.07.
[5] V. Vysotska, Information technology for internet resources promotion in search system based on
content analysis of web-page keywords. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ) 133–
151. doi: https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2021-3-12
[6] M. Klymchuk, Adaptyvna model protydii ryzykam biznes-protsesiv pidpryiemstv alternatyvnoi
enerhetyky, Business inform 2 (2013) 124–128. URL:
https://business-inform.net/annotatedcatalogue/?year=2013&amp;abstract=2013_02_0&amp;lang=ru&amp;stqa=25
[7] Yu. Shvets, Ryzyky v diialnosti promyslovykh pidpryiemstv: vydy, metody otsinky ta zakhody
podolannia ryzyku, Mizhnarodni ekonomichni vidnosyny ta svitove hospodarstvo 17 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ), (2018),
131–135. URL: http://www.visnyk-econom.uzhnu.uz.ua/archive/17_2_2018ua/31.pdf
[8] A. Hayes, Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) 2021. URL:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/enterprise-risk-management.asp
[9] P. Ávila, A. Mota, J. Bastos, L. Patrício, A. Pires, H. Castro, M. Manuela Cruz-Cunha, L.Varela,
Framework for a risk assessment model to apply in Virtual / Collaborative Enterprises. Procedia
Computer Science 181 (2021) 612–618. URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050921002519?via%3Dihub. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.208.
[10] A. Karpenko, N. Karpenko, Klastery i klasterna polityka yak rushii innovatsiinoho rozvytku
rehioniv Ukrainy, In: IV Mizhnarodna naukvo-praktychna konferentsiia, Kropyvnytskyi (2021),
164–166. URL: https://www.iamcluster.zp.ua/docs/clusters-and-cluster-policy/
[11] IAM Klaster Kharkiv, 2022. URL: https://www.iamcluster.kharkiv.ua/
[12] EAM Zaporizhzhia, 2022. URL: https://www.iamcluster.zp.ua/docs/clusters-and-cluster-policy/
[13] T.L. Saaty, Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process, Management Science, July
1986, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 841-855. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841.
[14] Google Trends, 2021. URL: https:// www.google.com/trends/
[15] M. V. Dubinina, S. V. Syrtseva, T. Iu. Yankovska, Forenzik yak metod rozsliduvannia
vnutrishnokorporatyvnykh vypadkiv shakhraistva, Infrastruktura rynku 38 (2019) 377–383. doi:
10.32843/infrastruct38-59.
[16] A. Kovbel`, Forenzik: naibolee rasprostranenny`e skhemy` moshennichestva, 2019. URL: https://
loyer.com.ua/ru/27410-2/.
[17] A. O. Semenets, Forenzik audyt yak efektyvnyi zasib antykryzovoho upravlinnia torhovelnoiu
diialnistiu, Biznes Inform 4 (2019) 280–287. doi: 10.32983/2222-4459-2019-4-280-287.
[18] S. Yu. Bogdanova, N. S. Kutusheva, V. R. Shajkhumova, Z. I. Fazletdinova, Analiz
marketingovoj informaczii na osnove instrumentariya publichnogo web-prilozheniya Google
Trends, Upravlenie e`konomicheskimi sistemami 4 (2017) 1–9.
[19] H. V. Solomina, Forenzik – instrument finansovoho rozsliduvannia diialnosti pidpryiemstva,
Naukovyi Visnyk Mukachivskoho Derzhavnoho Universytetu 2(10) (2018) 144−149. doi:
10.31339/2313-8114-2018-2(10)-144-149.
[20] O. Palyvoda, D. Palokha, Ryzyky formuvannia ta funktsionuvannia klasternoi modeli rozvytku
orhanizatsii, Efektyvna ekonomika 5 (2015). URL:
http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&amp;z=4069.
[21] Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, Risk-oriented planning of internal audit activities,
Methodological manual 2020, Kyiv. URL: http://surl.li/bkwfu.
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Polinkevych</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Khovrak</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Trynchuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Klapkiv</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Volynets</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Business risk management in times of crises and pandemics</article-title>
          .
          <source>Montenegrin Journal of Economics</source>
          <volume>17</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          )
          <fpage>99</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>110</lpage>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). URL: http://www.mnje.com/sites/mnje.com/files/099-109_-_
          <string-name>
            <surname>polinkevych-</surname>
          </string-name>
          et-al.
          <article-title>-ukr</article-title>
          ._-_w.u._-_rrr.pdf. doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .14254/1800-5845/
          <year>2021</year>
          .17-
          <issue>3</issue>
          .
          <fpage>8</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Kliuiev</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Vnukova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Hlibko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Brynza</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Davydenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Estimation of the Level of Interest and Modeling of the Topic of Innovation Through Search in Google</article-title>
          ,
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems (COLINS</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          ), pp.
          <fpage>523</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>535</lpage>
          . URL: http://ceur-ws.
          <source>org/</source>
          Vol-
          <volume>2604</volume>
          /paper38.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Vnukova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Achkasova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Gorokhovatskyi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Pysarevska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Decomposition of Google Trends Series for the Search of Patterns and Seasonality of Financial Risk Control Interest</article-title>
          ,
          <source>In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference of Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems (Collins</source>
          <year>2021</year>
          ). Volume I: Main Conference,
          <volume>613</volume>
          -
          <fpage>628</fpage>
          . URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol2870/paper46.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>