=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-3206/paper11 |storemode=property |title=Trajectory Modeling Calculation and Maneuverability Analysis of Proportional Navigation Method |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3206/paper11.pdf |volume=Vol-3206 |authors=Xingwang Li,Shuangjie Liu,Yongping Hao }} ==Trajectory Modeling Calculation and Maneuverability Analysis of Proportional Navigation Method== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3206/paper11.pdf
Trajectory Modeling Calculation and Maneuverability Analysis of
Proportional Navigation Method
Xingwang Li 1, Shuangjie Liu 1*, Yongping Hao 1
1
    Shenyang Ligong University, Shenyang 110159, China

                Abstract
                Aiming at the ballistic characteristics and related performance indexes of a certain type of anti-
                aircraft missile, the differential equations of missile-target relative motion are established.
                Under different given initial conditions, the Runge-Kutta method is used to solve the system
                of micro-equations numerically. Thereby, the ballistic curve, ballistic parameters and
                performance index parameters of the corresponding missile interception are obtained. In the
                simulation, different missile/target maneuvering conditions, route shortcuts and interception
                methods are verified and calculated to measure the missile's ballistic characteristics and
                performance indicators comprehensively. The simulation results show that when the
                proportional guidance method is used, under different missile/target maneuvering conditions
                and interception methods, the greater the target maneuvering degree, the smaller the curvature
                radius of the missile's ballistic curve, and the greater the required normal overload and miss
                distance. The ballistic interception trajectory and the interception interception trajectory are
                relatively straight, and the required normal overload and misses are relatively small; when
                intercepting in the air, the radius of curvature of the ballistic trajectory is the smallest, and the
                required normal overload and misses are the largest.

                Keywords1
                Ballistic characteristics, Runge-Kutta method, Proportional guidance,Normal overload,
                Miss distance

1. Introduction
    The power of the missile mainly depends on the guidance accuracy of the missile and the number of
warhead ammunition, and the guidance rules based on previous research are often referred to as
conventional guidance rules. There are three main induction rules: tracking method, line-of-sight
display induction method and proportional guidance method.The proportional guidance method is
simple, technically easy to implement, does not require too much information, its trajectory is relatively
flat, mechanical targets and low-altitude flying targets can be intercepted, the import accuracy is high,
and it is widely used[1].
    Generally speaking, in the guidance system of a missile, the role of the guidance law is to ensure
that the missile flies and hits the target's kinematic trajectory. The guidance law also determines the
flight trajectory of the missile center of mass in space.So, how to choose a suitable guidance method to
improve the guidance performance of the missile, improve the hit accuracy of the missile, and reduce
the amount of misses, has always been our special attention[2-3]. Some scholars briefly introduced the
commonly used missile guidance laws in their articles, took the proportional guidance method as an
example to conduct a two-dimensional plane simulation of the guidance ballistic, and analyzed the
proportional guidance coefficient, the ratio of the missile and the target speed, etc. The influence of the



ISCIPT2022@7th International Conference on Computer and Information Processing Technology, August 5-7, 2022, Shenyang, China
EMAIL: 2569754876@qq.com (Xingwang Li); *Corresponding author's email: shuangjieliu@126.com (Shuangjie Liu); yphsit@126.com
(Yongping Hao)
ORCID: 0000-0003-1647-2849 (Xingwang Li); 0000-0001-7013-642X (Shuangjie Liu); 0000-0003-0156-795X (Yongping Hao)
             ©️ 2022 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
             Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
             CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)




                                                                                 72
change of the main ballistic parameters on the ballistics, some suggestions for improving the missile
guidance and control system are put forward[4].

2. Vertical plane trajectory model
    This paper mainly studies the motion characteristics of the missile in the vertical plane. First, the
missile's full ballistic equation is decomposed on the vertical plane, and the dynamic mathematical
models of 10 vertical planes are obtained. Secondly, the dynamic mathematical model of the vertical
plane is replaced by the kinematic mathematical model of the vertical plane, that is, the change of the
tangential velocity and the normal maneuvering law of the missile are replaced by the known variation
law of the missile velocity movement. Then, the Runge-Kutta method is used to solve the two
differential equations about the sight angle of the target and the distance of the projectile, and the
simulation model of the ballistic trajectory is normalized.

2.1. Dynamic mathematical model
    Usually the movement of the missile can be decomposed into the movement of the missile's vertical
plane and the movement of the missile's horizontal plane. If we require a missile to fly at high altitude
and high speed in the vertical plane, then a horizontal lateral force in the horizontal direction should be
equivalent to at zero. If we choose the ground coordinate system Ax axis is located in the vertical plane,
at this time, β, γ, etc. are correspondingly regarded as zero. When a particle in the vertical plane moves,
the missile only performs a parallel motion and a rotational motion along the axis and the OZ1 axis in
the rotational direction of the center of the inner particle on the vertical plane. At this time, z=0 , 𝜔𝑥 =
0, 𝜔𝑦 = 0. When the missile moves along the vertical plane, the external forces of the missile are only:
the thrust P of the engine, the air resistance X, the lift Y, and the gravity G.Such as Formula 1.
                𝑑𝑉
             𝑚 = 𝑃 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 − 𝑋 − 𝑚𝑔 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜃
                𝑑𝑡
                 𝑑𝜃
            𝑚𝑉 𝑑𝑡 = 𝑃𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 + 𝑌 − 𝑚𝑔𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃
               𝑑𝜔
            𝐽𝑧 𝑑𝑡𝑧 = 𝑀𝑧
            𝑑𝑥
                = 𝑉 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃
            𝑑𝑡
            𝑑𝑦
                = 𝑉 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜃                                                                     (1)
            𝑑𝑡
            𝑑𝜗
                = 𝜔𝑧
            𝑑𝑡
            𝑑𝑚
                 = −𝑚𝑐
             𝑑𝑡
            𝛼 =𝜗−𝜃
            𝜙1 = 0
            𝜙4 = 0

2.2. Kinematic mathematical model
    In the preliminary research stage of our anti-aircraft missile and guidance system technology, in
order to further simplify the research, we assume that the missile, the target and the guidance station
always move in the same fixed plane, that is, on the attack plane, which may be a vertical plane, or a
may be horizontal or inclined.
    We choose the attack plane as the plumb plane for research.According to the kinematic analysis
method of guided ballistics, it is assumed that a relative motion parameter equation between the missile
and the attack target can be defined by the motion parameters such as r, q in polar coordinates in a plane
called the missile attack force. The relative transformation motion law of , etc. can be used to describe
it accurately.




                                                    73
Figure 1: Geometric relation of relative motion

    The relative motion equation of automatic aiming guidance refers to the equation describing the
relative distance r and the rate of change of the target line angle q. According to the relative motion
relationship between the missile and the target shown in Figure 1, the relative motion equation can be
established directly. The missile velocity vector VM and the target velocity vector VT are decomposed
along the target line direction and the normal line direction, respectively. The component 𝑉𝑀 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜂𝑀
points to the target along the target line, which reduces the relative distance r. The component 𝑉𝑇 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜂 𝑇
deviates from the missile, which increases the relative distance r. The normal component along the
target line, 𝑉𝑀 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜂𝑀 , rotates the target line counterclockwise around the origin where the target is
located to increase the target line angle q. The component 𝑉𝑇 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜂 𝑇 rotates the target line clockwise
around the missile's position as the origin, thereby reducing the target line angle q.
    We also consider the relative geometric motion relationship between the two motion angles shown
in Figure 1. When guided proportionally, when the attack plane is a vertical plane, σ is the ballistic
inclination angle θ. Therefore, the mathematical model of the kinematics of the missile in the vertical
plane can be written as Formula 2.
    Some parameters in the ballistic dynamics mathematical model of the vertical plane are very
confidential, so it is difficult for us to obtain these parameters. For example, the first two equations of
Formula 1 can know the lift coefficient and drag coefficient in the lift Y and the drag X, so the ballistic
is used. It is difficult to directly study the motion law of the missile with the dynamic mathematical
model. Therefore, we will study the kinematic mathematical model of the vertical plane ballistic
trajectory, and use the change law of the missile velocity movement in the kinematic model to replace
the change law of the tangential velocity of the first two equations of the equation group in the vertical
plane ballistic dynamic mathematical model. and the law of motion in the normal direction.
     𝑑𝑟
        = 𝑉𝑇 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜂 𝑇 − 𝑉𝑀 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜂𝑀
    𝑑𝑡
              𝑑𝑞   1
              𝑑𝑡
                 = 𝑟 (𝑉𝑀 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜂𝑀 − 𝑉𝑇 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜂 𝑇 )
           𝑞 = 𝜎𝑀 + 𝜂𝑀                                                            (2)
           𝑞 = 𝜎𝑇 + 𝜂 𝑇
           𝑑𝜎     𝑑𝑞
           𝑑𝑡
              = 𝐾 𝑑𝑡

    In general, since the right side of the equation is a nonlinear function of the motion parameters, the
missile motion equations are nonlinear first-order ordinary differential equations. In this paper, the
Runge-Kutta method is used to carry out high-precision calculations. This algorithm is a high-precision
program that is easy to edit and calculate. It is also possible to quickly change the calculation step size.
    By normalizing the kinematic mathematical model of the vertical plane trajectory, we can design the
simulation algorithm according to the simulation model and initial conditions, and then carry out the
simulation. After obtaining the trajectory and the trajectory of the target, the final analysis of the results
is carried out, including the calculation of the missed target amount and the normal overload.




                                                     74
2.3. Simulation analysis
2.3.1. Simulation example
    The target moves in a straight line with horizontal uniform acceleration, and the acceleration is
𝑎𝑇 .The missile moves at a uniform acceleration of 𝑎𝑀 .
    An example of missile head-on interception: the initial target speed is 300m/s, the initial missile
speed is 600m/s, the initial missile target distance is 7000m, the initial target line of sight angle is 50 °,
the initial lead angle is -3 °and the relevant parameters are shown in Table 1.

Table 1
Missile head-on interception
            example                                  𝑎𝑇                                  𝑎𝑀
               A1                                     0                                   0
               B1                                     0                                  15
               C1                                     6                                  15

    An example of missile tail pursuit and interception: the initial target speed is 300m/s, the initial
missile speed is 600m/s, the initial missile target distance is 2000m, the initial target line of sight angle
is 50 °, and the initial lead angle is 3 °and the relevant parameters are shown in Table 2.In addition, we
also assume that in the process of missile flying to the target, the rotation of the earth, the curvature of
the earth and the influence of wind are not considered, and the missile also has an ideal control and
guidance system.

Table 2
Missile tail pursuit interception
              example                                𝑎𝑇                                  𝑎𝑀
                 A2                                   0                                   0
                 B2                                   0                                  15
                 C2                                   5                                  15

2.3.2. Simulation result
   When the scale factor is 3, the flight time and miss distance of the three calculation examples of the
missile intercepting the target head-on are shown in the Table 3 below.The last three are data with a
scale factor of 5.The data of tail pursuit interception are shown in Table 4.
   From the simulation results, we know that in the case of only increasing the flight speed of the
missile, the flight time of the missile decreases with the increase of the speed of the missile to a certain
extent. The proportional coefficient K also has a certain effect on the flight time, but the effect is not as
great as the effect of increasing the missile flight speed on the flight time. In the case of only increasing
the target flight speed, the flight time decreases with the increase of the target speed to a certain extent.
Table 3
Results of head-on interception of targets
                                 example       flight time(s) Miss distance(s)
                                    A1              9.55              3.16
                                    B1              8.75              2.70
                                    C1              8.65              4.82
                                   A11              9.45              4.65
                                   B11              8.60              2.78
                                   C11              8.55              6.34



                                                     75
Table 4
Results of tail pursuit interception of targets
                               example       flight time(s)    Miss distance(s)
                                  A2              2.80               4.73
                                  B2              2.70               6.20
                                  C2              2.65               8.21
                                 A22              2.75               5.36
                                 B22              2.65               4.42
                                 C22              2.55               7.38




Figure2: Trajectory of A1,B1,C1




  Figure 3: Trajectory of A1,A11

    As the speed of the missile increases, the trajectory of the missile will be straighter, and the radius
of curvature will be larger; as the speed of the target increases, the trajectory of the missile will be more
curved, and the radius of curvature will be smaller; as the proportional coefficient increases, the
trajectory of the missile will be more Straight, the radius of curvature will be larger. In addition, a
relatively curved front section of the ballistic trajectory can be obtained. In the front section of the
missile trajectory, the proportional guidance method can reasonably and fully utilize the
maneuverability of the missile.




                                                     76
Figure 4: Normal overload of A1,A11




Figure 5: Trajectory of A2,B2,C2

   When the missile speed is constant, the normal overload will decrease to a certain extent with the
increase of the proportional coefficient K. As shown in Figure 4.At the same time, the miss distance is
also an important index for us to study whether the missile can hit the target accurately. With the
increase of target maneuvering acceleration, the miss distance will also increase, and the missile
maneuvering acceleration and scale coefficient will also have different effects on the miss distance.The
simulation data of miss distance are shown in Table 3 and Table 4.
   The simulation diagram of the relevant tail chasing intercepting target is similar to the simulation
diagram of the head-on intercepting target, which will not be explained here.

3. Acknowledgements
   Thanks to the scholarly monographs cited in this article and to my teachers for their guidance.

4. Conclusion
   From the comprehensive point of view of the paper, the guidance law of the missile determines
whether the missile can accurately hit the target. In the process of attacking the target, the missile needs
to comprehensively consider the position state of the missile attack target, and select the appropriate
proportional coefficient K to determine whether the missile trajectory can be carried out. Reasonable
control, etc., and the process of missile attacking the target is a very complex process, and there are
many factors that affect it. In the process of modeling in this paper, we have simplified the model to
facilitate the analysis of various problems. Many factors We have not considered it, and this is also the
direction of our next research.



                                                    77
5. References
[1] Gao Shang.Simulation of ideal ballistics with proportional guidance[J].Computer Engineering and
    Design,2003(08):66-68.
[2] BWicaksono,AHalim,Kurdianto.Performanc e evaluation of proportional navigation methode
    during target pursuit with disturbance[J].Journal of Physics: Conference Series,2018,1130(1).
[3] Feng Tyan. Analysis of General Ideal Proportional Navigation Guidance Laws[J]. Asian Journal
    of Control,2016,18(3).
[4] Zhang Zhongnan, TongYoutang. Simulation research on guided ballistics by proportional guidance
    method[J].Tactical Missile Technology.2005(02).
[5] Yunes Sh. ALQUDSI, Gamal M. EL- BAYOUMI. A Qualitative Comparison between the
    Proportional      Navigation        and      Differential     Geometry       GuidanceAlgorithms
    [J].INCASBULLETIN,2018,10(2).




                                                78