2022
Proceedings Department of mathematics and informatics
Faculty of Sciences University of Novi Sad, Serbia 2022
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Department of mathematics and informatics Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia www.pmf.uns.ac.rs
Papers are copyrighted © 2022 by the papers’ authors. Copying permitted only for private and academic purposes. This volume is published and copyrighted by its editors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). The contents of the published papers express the opinions of their respective authors, not the volume publisher or the editors.
Typeset in LATEX and Microsoft Word by Doni Pracner and the authors of individual papers.
This volume contains papers presented at the Ninth Workshop on Software Quality Analysis, Monitoring, Improvement, and Applications (SQAMIA 2022). SQAMIA 2022 was held during 11 – 14. 09. 2022, at the Department of mathematics and Informatics, Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.
SQAMIA 2022 continued the tradition of successful SQAMIA workshops previously held in Novi Sad, Serbia (in 2012, 2013 and 2018), Lovran, Croatia (2014), Maribor, Slovenia (2015), Budapest, Hungary (2016), Belgrade, Serbia (2017) and Ohrid, North Macedonia (2019). The first SQAMIA workshop was organized within the 5th Balkan Conference in Informatics (BCI 2012). In 2013, SQAMIA became a standalone event intended to be an annual gathering of researchers and practitioners in the field of software quality. Unfortunately, the workshop was not held in 2020 and 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The main objective of the SQAMIA series of workshops is to provide a forum for presentation, discussion and dissemination of the latest scientific achievements in the area of software quality, and to promote and improve interaction and collaboration among scientists and young researchers from the region and beyond. The workshop especially welcomes position papers, papers describing work in progress, tool demonstration papers, technical reports, and papers designed to provoke debate on present knowledge, open questions, and future research trends in software quality.
The SQAMIA 2022 workshop consisted of regular sessions with technical contributions reviewed and selected by an international program committee, as well as three invited talks by Klaus Bothe, Dragana Georgijević and Gordana Rakić. In total 15 papers were accepted and published in this proceedings volume. All published papers were at least double reviewed, and in some cases even quadruple reviewed. We are grateful to all PC members for submitting careful and timely opinions on the papers.
Our special thanks are also addressed to the members of the SQAMIA Initiative (sqamia.org) without whom this and previous workshops could not be possible: Zoran Budimac (Novi Sad, Serbia), Tihana Galinac Grbac (Pula, Croatia), Marjan Heričko (Maribor, Slovenia), Zoltán Horváth (Budapest, Hungary) and Hannu Jaakkola (Pori, Finland)
We thank the Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad for partially sponsoring the event.
We extend special thanks to the SQAMIA 2022 Organizing Committee from the Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, especially to Nataša Sukur for her hard work and dedication to make this workshop the best it can be. Further we’d like to thank Doni Pracner for his patience and diligent work on making the proceedings.
And last, but not least, we thank all the participants of SQAMIA 2022 for their contributions that made all the work that went into SQAMIA 2022 worthwhile.
Zoran Budimac
Zoran Budimac (University of Novi Sad, Serbia) Program
Committee
Nataša Sukur (chair, University of Novi Sad, Serbia) Doni Pracner (University of Novi Sad, Serbia) Ivan Pribela (University of Novi Sad, Serbia) Smiljana Knežev (University of Novi Sad, Serbia) Dušica Knežević (University of Novi Sad, Serbia) Davorka Radaković (University of Novi Sad, Serbia)
Doni Pracner (University of Novi Sad, Serbia)
◦ Inferring The Best Static Analysis Tool For Null Pointer Dereference in Java Source Code . . . 1:1– 1:12
Midya Alqaradaghi, Tamás Kozsik ◦ Utilizing Interaction Metrics in a Virtual Learning Environment for Early Prediction of Students’ Academic Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2:1– 2:12 Saša Brdnik, Vili Podgorelec, Tjaša Heričko ◦ A Quantitative Study of C/C++ FOSS Software Buildability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3:1– 3:10
Dalibor Fonović, Tihana Galinac Grbac ◦ A Framework for C++ Exception Handling Assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4:1– 4:13
Endre Fülöp, Attila Gyen, Norbert Pataki ◦ A Quality Gate Role in a Software Delivery Pipeline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6:1– 6:12
Marko Gluhak, Luka Pavlic ◦ Handling Software Icebergs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:1– 7:8
Jaak Henno, Hannu Jaakkola, Jukka Mäkelä ◦ Commit Classification Into Maintenance Activities Using Aggregated Semantic Word Embeddings of Software Change Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8:1– 8:12 Tjaša Heričko, Saša Brdnik, Boštjan Šumak ◦ Using Self-Sovereign-Identity Principles to Prove Your Worth in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9:1– 9:12 Vid Keršič, Andraž Vrečko, Urban Vidovič, Martin Domajnko, Muhamed Turkanović. ◦ Testing RESTful APIs - Use Case: RESTful API for Solving Multidimensional Time-independent Schrödinger Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10:1– 10:12 Bojana Koteska, Davor Dimoski, Ljupco Pejov, Anastas Mishev ◦ Comparison of Project Management Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12:1– 12:10
Filip Pasarič, Maja Pušnik