<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The representation of energy, energy carriers and fuels in the Open Energy Ontology</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mirjam Stappel</string-name>
          <email>mirjam.stappel@iee.fraunhofer.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Lukas Emele</string-name>
          <email>l.emele@oeko.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ludwig Hülk</string-name>
          <email>ludwig.huelk@rl-institut.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Hannah Förster</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology (IEE)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Joseph-Beuys-Str. 8, 34117 Kassel</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Öko-Institut (Institute for Applied Ecology)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Borkumstraße 2, 13189 Berlin</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Reiner Lemoine Institute (RLI)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Rudower Chaussee 12, 12489 Berlin</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The Open Energy Ontology (OEO) is a BFO-based ontology for the domain of energy system analysis. Core of this domain is the concept of energy. Since the concept of energy is ambiguous and has not (yet) been introduced into BFO, we describe why the OEO classifies energy as a quality. We present how energy is diferentiated from energy carriers, fuels and other related concepts. The process of energy conversion makes it possible to depict many diferent types of its generation and usage. Further, we describe the concept of origin of matter and energy. In this article, we define the core concepts of the OEO according to the BFO. We thus demonstrate how the OEO enables the consistent use of core concepts throughout the energy system analysis domain.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;CEUR-WS</kwd>
        <kwd>ontology</kwd>
        <kwd>energy</kwd>
        <kwd>energy carrier</kwd>
        <kwd>energy system analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>fossil</kwd>
        <kwd>fuel</kwd>
        <kwd>renewable</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Researchers in the domain of energy system analysis (ESA) use energy system models to explore
current and future energy systems. Such models are often applied to questions involving the
expansion of the use of renewable energy sources, energy storage and to investigate how energy
and climate policy impact the energy system. ESA is a heterogeneous and multidisciplinary
domain. Experts in engineering, natural and social sciences, physics, mathematics, computer
science, economics, meteorology, and geography developed diferent nomenclatures and
conceptualisations for similar or the same things. These diferent terminologies are reflected in the
respective documentation of research data, models, and results. Due to this heterogeneity,
challenges arise regarding transparency and reproducibility. For example, time needs to be invested
to identify where and if a nomenclature is documented and how it difers from one’s own. To
address these challenges, the Open Energy Ontology (OEO) was created and we maintain and
develop it openly and collaboratively across institutes and research projects [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The OEO is
part of the Open Energy Family, a modular and collaborative framework for climate and energy
related research data management. The OEO is also integrated into the Open Energy Platform
(OEP), a web interface to an open database for energy and climate data [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Although energy is everywhere and we use it versatilely in our daily lifes, energy cannot be
grasped intuitively. Neither is it easy to represent in an ontology. But, as the name of the OEO
suggests, we consider energy as one of the ontology’s core topics. Thus, we have to properly
represent, classify and define the concept of energy and related subjects in the OEO and pay
special attention to it. Based on the book Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology (BFO)
by Arp et.al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] we derived some basic principles for the OEO1. The OEO is written in OWL2
Manchester Syntax and consists of several OEO-owned modules and some external ontologies
that are (partially) imported [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The majority of the energy-related concepts we discuss in this
paper are included in the module oeo-physical, where concepts of physical entities are stored.
In this article, we refer to OEO version 1.10.12.
      </p>
      <p>In the following, we describe the ontological representations and definitions of energy
(section 2), energy carriers and fuels (section 3), energy transformations (section 4). Implications
of the design choices are discussed in section 5.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Wave or particle – what is energy?</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1. Energy in the OEO</title>
        <p>Energy appears in various forms and humans use and transform it in many diferent ways.
In physics, energy is described both as matter-bound and immaterial. Energy can occur in
diferent states and can be transformed from one state into another. Examples for matter-bound
energies used in the domain are the chemical energy in wood or diesel, the kinetic energy of
wind (moving air) and the thermal energy of steam. In contrast, radiative energy that moves
through space without a material carrier is an example of immaterial character of energy in
the energy system analysis domain. These diferent forms of appearance of energy make the
classification of energy in an ontology neither intuitive nor self-explaining.</p>
        <p>
          In the OEO development process, described in [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ], we made the following design choice:
energy is classified as a quality (BFO:0000019) of, and thus being specifically dependent on,
material entities3. We defined energy as follows:
        </p>
        <p>Energy is a quality of material entity which manifests as a capacity to perform work
(such as causing motion or the interaction of molecules).4
Our design choice underlines the material-bound perspective to energy, which plays an
important role. To also depict the perceived immaterial aspects of energy, we introduced as a vehicle
the concept of photons5, understood as light particles. We axiomatised photons as bearer of
those aspects of energy, that are not perceived as matter-bound. The description of the BFO
1https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/ontology/wiki/Best-Practice-Principles
2https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/ontology/releases/tag/v1.10.1
3material entity, BFO_0000040, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000040
4https://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00000150
5A photon is a portion of matter that is a light particle. https://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_
00230021
class “material entity”, states the concept “photon” explicitly as material entity in its examples
of usage. Due to the nature of the OEO – focusing on matter-bound aspects of energy – we
thus decided to ignore the wave nature of photons. If we classified a photon as a wave in
addition, this may pose a challenge to upper-level ontologies such as the BFO: it would break
the distinction between continuants and occurrents.</p>
        <p>
          The intention of BFO2 is, that matter could encompass both mass and energy. It is planned
to introduce “portion of energy” in a later release of the BFO [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ]. Yet, in the current state of
the BFO, (portion of) energy is not available and applicable. In BFO, a quality is a specifically
dependent continuant, which means it relies on a specific bearer for its existence. Quality is
further explained as a specifically dependent continuant that, in contrast to roles and dispositions,
does not require any further process in order to be realized.6 From the perspective of physics,
where mass and energy can be seen as equivalents, as Einstein explained, the classification of
energy as a quality, alongside with mass, is reasonable. Material entities are bearers of energy
in its various subtypes. For example: the potential energy of a material entity is a persistent
attribute. Its value depends on the system of reference: the height of an object, and thus its
potential energy, is always relative to the height of the observer. Induced by a transformation
process, the contained amount or type of energy can be changed, see section 4.
        </p>
        <p>In the OEO we diferentiate energy into several subclasses. The subclasses categorise common
physical types of energy, i.e. chemical energy, electrical energy, kinetic energy, nuclear binding
energy, potential energy, radiative energy and thermal energy. From these, we derive further
energy subclasses with relevance for energy systems analysis (ESA). Subclasses are, for example,
wind energy7 and solar energy8. Other energy types depicted in the OEO are distinguished by
their origin9 (see also section 5), i.e. renewable energy and fossil energy. Renewable energy
sums up all energies that replenish on a human time scale, like solar energy, wind energy, etc.
Fossil energy is chemical energy that is stored in fossil combustion fuels, e.g. natural gas or
gasoline. We denfied both classes, renewable energy and fossil energy, by using an equivalence
of concepts. Since we classify energy and its subclasses as qualities of material entities, we have
to consider their relation with their bearer, which we describe in section 3.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2. Energy in other ontologies</title>
        <p>We extensively reviewed literature, analysed other energy-related ontologies and compiled the
result:10</p>
        <p>
          OEO refers to the capacity to perform work, when defining energy. This fundamental physical
interpretation of energy is also chosen by PATO (the Phenotype And Trait Ontology)11 [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ] and
ENVO (the Environment Ontology)12 [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ], both ontologies are based on BFO. PATO is an ontology
6see elucidation in http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000019
7Wind energy is the kinetic energy of moving air. https://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00000446
8Solar energy is radiative energy of the sun. https://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00000384
9https://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00000316
10https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/ontology/wiki/use-of-external-ontologies
11A physical quality inhering in a bearer by virtue of the bearer’s capacity to do work., http://purl.obolibrary.org/
obo/PATO_0001021
        </p>
        <p>12A disposition which is realized during the execution of work, the emission of heat, or the possession of mass.,
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_2000015
on phenotypic qualities (properties, attributes or characteristics)13, hence, the classification
as physical quality is not surprising. For OEO, we do not see the need to distinguish between
physical and other qualities, though. In ENVO, energy is defined as a disposition, which is also
a specifically dependent continuant, yet its realisation needs to get triggered by a process. A
comment in ENVO indicates that it is considered to align with PATO in the future.14 Although
PATO and ENVO chose similar definitions and classification for the concept of energy, we
decided to not re-use them, but create an OEO-owned class energy, mostly because of the central
relevance for the ESA domain.</p>
        <p>
          Other ontologies also have concepts related to energy, but do not strictly apply an upper-level
ontology that allows a comparison of classification. The enArgus ontology [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ] has a similar
domain as the OEO, but is in German language. It does not apply any upper-level ontology.
The class Energie is defined as follows: Energie ist eine physikalische Größe mit der Einheit
Joule (J) oder Wattsekunde (Ws). Sie hat das Formelzeichen E. Energie kann in unterschiedlichen
Energieformen vorliegen und wird mitunter auch Arbeit bezeichnet. 15
        </p>
        <p>
          The Saref4ener16 ontology defines saref:Energy as A saref:Property related to some
measurements that are characterized by a certain value measured in an energy unit (such as Kilowatt_Hour
or Watt_hour). Other energy-related ontologies to not explicitly classify it. For example the
OEMA (Ontology network for Energy Management Applications) [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ] or the energyCIM17
ontology, which contains the concept of EnergySource and several energy related classes.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. The diference between energy carrier and fuel</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1. Material entities and energy</title>
        <p>
          Every material entity is bearer of energy. Only a part of that energy is useful energy (exergy),
while the other part (anergy) cannot be exploited by any technical apparatus [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ]. As anergy
is not usable, it is of low interest for the ESA domain as ESA focuses on material entities
that additionally contain usable energy. Ontologically, these material entities possess the
disposition to carry energy. We define this energy carrier disposition as: An energy carrier
disposition is a disposition of an material entity that contains energy for conversion as usable
energy.18 Consequently, we call material entities that have the disposition to carry energy energy
carriers: An energy carrier is a material entity that has an energy carrier disposition.19 As every
material entity that carries energy is an energy carrier, we axiomatised energy carrier as an
equivalent class:
        </p>
        <p>13Quality is defined as A dependent entity that inheres in a bearer by virtue of how the bearer is related to other
entities http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/PATO_0000001, subclass of BFOs specifically dependent continuant
14Comment in ENVO_2000015: “Consider replacing with PATO class; note that PATO class is not a disposition.
This should likely go into OBO Core and also have a physicist look at it.”</p>
        <p>15https://www.enargus.de/pub/bscw.cgi/d3048-2/*/*/Energie.html?op=Wiki.getwiki Translation: Energy is a
physical quantity with the unit Joule (J) or Watt second (Ws). It has the formula sign E. Energy can be present in
diferent forms of energy and is sometimes also called work.</p>
        <p>16https://saref.etsi.org/core/Energy
17https://github.com/smart-data-models/dataModel.EnergyCIM/
18https://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00000151
19https://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00020039
'energy carrier' EquivalentTo: 'material entity' and</p>
        <p>('has disposition' some 'energy carrier disposition')
How exactly are material entities related to energy? Let us take water as an example: Water
can be hot (contain thermal energy), can be moving (contain kinetic energy) or be elevated
(contain potential energy), but its energy value can also be zero. How can hot water and other
heated material entities be grouped and related to thermal energy? How can moving water
and other accelerated material entities be related to kinetic energy? In the OEO, we created
“anonymous classes” (general class axioms) to establish these relations. For example, the fact
that all “moving/accelerated things” have kinetic energy is axiomatised as:
'material entity' and ('bearer of' some 'kinetic energy')</p>
        <p>SubClassOf: 'has disposition' some 'energy carrier disposition'
Similarly, we created anonymous classes for all “heated things” that contain thermal energy, all
“electrically charged things” that contain electrical energy, all “combustible things” that contain
chemical energy, all “elevated things” that contain potential energy.</p>
        <p>Radiative energy is a special case, since it represents the wave-like characteristics of energy.
To conform to the scheme of material entities being the bearer of the quality energy, we defined
photons as light particles. Photons are the only (relevant) energy carriers for radiative energy,
thus we axiomatised as follows:
photon SubClassOf: 'has quality' some 'radiative energy'
photon SubClassOf: 'has disposition' some 'energy carrier disposition'
A photon can also behave like a wave. This is in almost all cases irrelevant to the domain of
ESA. Thus, we excluded this aspect from the definition and axiomatisation of photon.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2. A portion of matter with a role</title>
        <p>
          An important concept, we introduced in the OEO, is portion of matter20. This class encompasses
materials like coal, gasoline, water, carbon dioxide, methane, air, uranium, steel and minerals
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ]. Some of these contain useful energy, which can be released by processes that transform the
portion of matter into a diferent kind of portion of matter (for transformations in general see
section 4). An example is the oxidation of a portion of carbon with a portion of oxygen. This
forms carbon dioxide in the process (and releases heat). Those portions of matter that contain
useful energy have an energy carrier disposition and of these the ones that can be transformed
in such a process, have additionally a fuel role:
        </p>
        <p>A fuel role is a role of a portion of matter that has the disposition to be an energy
carrier and is used in a process that releases the carried energy by transforming the
portion of matter into a diferent kind of portion of matter in a way that releases heat
or does work.21
20A portion of matter is an aggregate of material entities that have a state of matter. http://openenergy-platform.
org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00000331
21http://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00000001</p>
        <p>We call portions of matter which have a fuel role fuels22, implemented as equivalent class. As
a consequence, all portions of matter which have a fuel role can be inferred as subclass of fuel.
But not all material entities which have the energy carrier disposition are portions of matter
with a fuel role. This answers our initial question of this section: All fuels are energy carriers,
but not all energy carriers are fuels.</p>
        <p>independent continuant
specifically dependent</p>
        <p>continuant
material entity
realizable entity</p>
        <p>entity
continuant</p>
        <p>occurent
has output has input
object aggregate
role
disposition
quality</p>
        <p>process
has bearer</p>
        <p>origin
has origin</p>
        <p>has origin
portion of matter
energy
transformation
has bearer
fuel role</p>
        <p>= fuel
has role
has disposition</p>
        <p>= energy carrier
energy carrier
disposition
has disposition
has energy input
has energy output
has participant
energy transformation</p>
        <p>22A fuel is a portion of matter that has the disposition to be an energy carrier and which has a fuel role. http:
//openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00000001</p>
        <p>To further diferentiate between diferent types of fuels, we distinguish fuels depending
on whether they release their energy content by using some kind of chemical reaction (e.g.
combustion)23 or in a nuclear reaction, notably nuclear fission (nuclear fusion does not (yet)
play any role in the ESA domain)25.</p>
        <p>Figure 1 summarises how the OEO classes we described relate to each other and how they fit
into the upper hierarchical structure of the BFO using object properties from both the Relation
ontology (RO) and newly defined in the OEO. We introduce the energy transformation class
shown in the graph in the next section.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. How to use energy? Transform it.</title>
      <p>While our everyday language describes how energy is produced (generated) or consumed (used),
the laws of thermodynamics tell us that it is all about changes in form. Energy possesses the
ability to be converted from one type into another. In the OEO, we defined a transformation as
a process that transforms one or more inputs into at least one output.27 For our domain, a relevant
subclass is energy transformation</p>
      <p>Energy transformation is a process in which one or more certain types of energy as
input result in certain types of energy as output.28
We defined this broadly so as to allow any kind of energy transformation sub-process. This also
includes the so called “energy losses”, e.g. in the form of waste heat.</p>
      <p>We created an object property called has energy participant: A relation between an artificial
object or a process and an energy, where the energy is used in the artificial object or process. 29 with
the sub-properties has energy input and has energy output. They relate the energy transformation
processes and the involved energies, see Figure 1.</p>
      <p>The relevant facilities where the energy transformations take place are grouped in the class
energy transformation units30. Examples for energy transformation units are power plants or
power-to-gas systems. Their internal components which are performing the transformation,
like turbines or electrolysers, are grouped into the class energy converting component31.</p>
      <p>23A combustion fuel is a fuel that realises its fuel role in processes that release energy in the form of heat or work by
chemical reaction with other substances.24</p>
      <p>25A nuclear fuel is a fuel that realises its fuel role in processes that release energy in the form of heat or work by
undergoing nuclear fission. 26
27https://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00000429
28https://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00020003
29https://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00010238
30An energy transformation unit is an artificial object that transforms, changes or transfers a certain type of energy. ,
https://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00020102</p>
      <p>31An energy converting component is an artificial object that is usually a discrete part of an energy transformation
unit with the function of transforming, transferring or changing a certain type of energy. http://openenergy-platform.
org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00000011</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Implications regarding BFO and RO imports</title>
      <p>We decided to define energy as quality, which is a specifically dependent continuant in BFO. But,
as described in Section 2, classifying energy is ambiguous. Therefore, and because energy plays
such an important role for the ESA domain, it becomes necessary that, unlike other specifically
dependent continuants, energy itself needs to be bearer of qualities and roles. This is a special
case that is not foreseen in BFO. But for the central concept of energy, we decided to make an
exception here. This exception entails some implications, we describe in the following.</p>
      <p>One of the most important ongoing research topics in the ESA domain is to find solutions for
the climate crisis. A central aspect here is the question of where the energy comes from, e.g. if
it is renewable or not. The questions of origin is also asked for the portion of matter carrying
the energy. Thus we introduced origin as a quality of both energy and a portion of matter:
Origin is a quality of a portion of matter or energy based on where it comes from. It is
inherited from its primary sources. 32</p>
      <p>To relate a portion of matter or energy to its origin we created the object property has origin33
with the domain energy or 'portion of matter'. To distinguish between several types
of origins, we defined several subclasses. Some subclasses are limited to being a quality of either
portion of matter or energy.</p>
      <p>We mentioned in section 2 two important subclasses of origin: renewable and fossil. Renewable
is an origin of energies only, defined as: Renewable is an origin of energies that replenish on a
human time scale.34 As counterpart to renewable, there is conventional35 as further origin of
energies.</p>
      <p>As fossil in the ESA domain is ultimately connected to some energy carrying materials like
coal, oil or natural gas extracted from the ground, it is thus an origin of portions of matter. Fossil
is a geogenic origin of portions of matter created from organic material by geological processes
lasting thousands or millions of years.</p>
      <p>The origin quality is transferred if the portion of matter or energy is transformed and the
output of the process inherits the origin: Crude oil has clearly a fossil origin, but also gasoline or
heating oil are fossil as they are produced from crude oil. Similarly, the kinetic energy of moving
air (usually called wind energy) has a renewable origin. When transforming wind energy into
electrical energy, the latter inherits the renewable quality and thus electrical energy generated
in a wind turbine has renewable origin, in contrast to electrical energy generated in a coal
power plant. Other subclasses of origin that inhere in portions of matter are: anthropogenic36,
32http://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00000316
33x has the origin of y http://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00000530
34http://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00030004
35Conventional is an origin of energies that don’t replenish when transformed / consumed. http://
openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00020147</p>
      <p>36Anthropogenic is an origin of portions of matter or energies created by human activity. http://openenergy-platform.
org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00030000
synthetic37, biogenic38, and geogenic39. We currently discuss an origin sustainable for portions
of matter.40</p>
      <p>Apart from origin, energies can also bear roles, i.e. the commodity role. Electrical energy is
commonly traded at energy market exchanges as a commodity, similarly to fuels like oil. Thus
we needed to weaken the domain of the object properties bearer of 41 and has role42. In the OEO,
their range has been extended to energy or 'independent continuant'.</p>
      <p>We introduced the object property has energy participant and its subproperties in section 4 to
axiomatise artificial objects or processes to energies. These special object properties reduce the
need to weaken object properties like has participant43 and subproperties, imported from RO.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Conclusion and future work</title>
      <p>Energy is challenging to classify ontologically due to its dual character. Some ontologies in
the energy domain avoid to classify energy, either by not using an upper-level ontology or by
avoiding the concept at all. For the use cases of the OEO and due to its design, an appropriate
classification is worthwhile. With this paper we demonstrate why it is useful for the domain of
energy systems analysis to classify energy as a quality of material entities. We showed that the
current version of BFO is not optimal for classifying energy. We were able to depict the diferent
aspects of energy and related concepts like energy carriers and transformations, though.</p>
      <p>In the ESA domain there is often no clear distinction between a material entity, its capability
to carry energy and the energy itself. This means that a lump of coal and the energy contained
in that lump of coal is often treated as the same: An energy systems modeller requires to depict
the energy contained in that lump of coal and thus does not quantify that lump of coal other
than directly in an energy unit (J). But to calculate CO2 emissions from its combustion, the
properties calculated in a mass unit (kg) or a volumetric unit (m3) get relevant.</p>
      <p>The OEO does not yet cover all aspects of energy. For example the distinction between
usable energy (exergy) and non-usable energy (anergy) is currently under discussion.44 Despite
classifying energy as a quality, energy itself can be bearer of roles. In the OEO we covered this
so far for electrical energy having a commodity role as it is traded at energy market exchanges.
However, there are likely more roles of diferent types of energy to explore.</p>
      <p>The OEO also distinguishes between energy and power, as well as the concepts of installation
capacities. However, this goes beyond the scope of this paper and may be content of a later
publication.</p>
      <p>37Synthetic is an anthropogenic origin of portions of matter created artificially by a chemical process. http://
openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00030005</p>
      <p>38Biogenic is an origin of portions of matter made by or produced from life forms. http://openenergy-platform.org/
ontology/oeo/OEO_00030001</p>
      <p>39Geogenic is an origin of portions of matter or energies that are the result of geological processes. http:
//openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo/OEO_00030003
40https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/ontology/issues/872
41http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0000053
42http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0000087
43http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0000057
44https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/ontology/issues/1166</p>
      <p>With clear definitions of energy and related classes as well as axioms describing the relations
between these classes, the OEO not only represents the knowledge of the domain. It will function
as the foundation of the Open Energy Knowledge Graph45 which is currently under development
as part of the Open Energy Family in the SIROP project. We see further applications of the OEO
in data annotation and in facilitating comparisons of energy scenario studies.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>We wrote this paper as part of the research project SIROP – Towards Scenario Interoperability
(grant number 03EI1035), performed by Fraunhofer IEE, Öko-Institut (Institute for Applied
Ecology), Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg and Reiner Lemoine Institute, and funded
by the 7th Energy Research Programme of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Afairs
and Climate Action (BMWK). We thank all members of the OEO development team. Without
their contribution to the ontology this paper would have been impossible.</p>
      <p>45https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/oekg</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>A. Online Resources</title>
      <p>The Open Energy Ontology (OEO) can be downloaded via the Open Energy Platform (OEP).46
For easy access, the OEP provides an ontology class viewer.47 The OEO is mainly developed on
GitHub48 and in developper meetings49 that take place online usually every fortnight.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Booshehri</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Emele</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Flügel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Förster</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Frey</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
            <surname>Frey</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Glauer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Hastings</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Hofmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Hoyer-Klick</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Hülk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kleinau</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Knosala</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Kotzur</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Kuckertz</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Mossakowski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Muschner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Neuhaus</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Pehl</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Robinius</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Sehn</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Stappel</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Introducing the Open Energy Ontology:
          <article-title>Enhancing data interpretation and interfacing in energy systems analysis</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Energy and AI</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.egyai.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>100074</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Reder</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Stappel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Hofmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Förster</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Emele</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Hülk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Glauer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Identification of user requirements for an energy scenario database</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .5278/ijsepm.3327.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Arp</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Smith</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Spear</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology</article-title>
          , MIT Press,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Smith</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Basic Formal Ontology</source>
          <volume>2</volume>
          .0
          <article-title>- Specification and user's guide</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          . https://github. com/bfo-ontology/BFO/wiki.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Mabee</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Ashburner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Cronk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Gkoutos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Haendel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Segerdell</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Mungall</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Westerfield</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Phenotype ontologies: the bridge between genomics and evolution</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution</source>
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <fpage>345</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>350</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.tree.
          <year>2007</year>
          .
          <volume>03</volume>
          .013.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Buttigieg</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Pafilis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
            <surname>Lewis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Schildhauer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Walls</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Mungall</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The environment ontology in 2016: bridging domains with increased scope, semantic density, and interoperation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Biomedical Semantics</source>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
          <source>doi:10.1186/s13326-016-0097-6.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Oppermann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Hirzel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Güldner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Heiwolt</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Krassowski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
            <surname>Schade</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Lange</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W. Prinz,
          <article-title>Finding and analysing energy research funding data: The EnArgus system</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Energy and AI</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.egyai.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>100070</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Cuenca</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Larrinaga</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Curry</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A unified semantic ontology for energy management applications</article-title>
          , in: WSP/WOMoCoE@ISWC,
          <year>2017</year>
          . URL: http://ceur-ws.
          <source>org/</source>
          Vol-1936/paper-08. pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>P. O'Callaghan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Probert</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Exergy and economics,
          <source>Applied Energy</source>
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <year>1981</year>
          )
          <fpage>227</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>243</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/
          <fpage>0306</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2619</lpage>
          (
          <issue>81</issue>
          )
          <fpage>90020</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>9</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>