<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Decidability in Description Logics and Beyond</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>DL Invited Talk Abstract</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Computational Logic Group, TU Dresden</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>01062 Dresden</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>Decidability, query entailment, ontology-mediated queries Decidability of inferencing is commonly considered a very important property of logic-based knowledge representation formalisms, required for the algorithmization and automation of reasoning. Yet, oftentimes, the corresponding (un)decidability arguments are idiosyncratic and do not shed much light on the underlying principles governing the divide. In my talk, I will review generic model- and proof-theoretic criteria for decidability of querying in fragments of first-order logic. Description logics play a central role in these considerations: They can serve as a simplified “testbed” inspiring decidability criteria which can then be generalized to higher arities.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>LGOBE
rOcid</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>