<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dario Lombardi</string-name>
          <email>dario.lombardi@unifg.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Stanford HAI</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Oxford AIxSDGs.</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Artificial Intelligence</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ruangguru, Embibe, Packback, Canvas, Human Artificial Intelligence</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Learning Science Hub, University of Foggia</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Arpi Street 176, Foggia, 71122</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The digital revolution is underway, and artificial intelligence is governing developments in every field. The worlds of finance, entertainment, welfare, health, and especially education are overwhelmed by the potential that such devices, through human ingenuity and technology, can express to lead society toward a prosperous and better modernity. In this regard, the following position paper, through a nonformal exploratory literature review, will assess the benefits brought by artificial intelligence in distance learning, in-presence, and administrative organization within educational settings. With the intention of analyzing the peculiarities and potential of such technological devices in educational settings, we will proceed with an initial definition of artificial intelligence. The use of artificial intelligence in traditional education as a tool to support and enhance educational intervention will be examined. The middle section of the paper will analyze the characteristics, usefulness, benefits, and sometimes critical issues associated with the use of AI-based educational platforms prevalent in international educational systems. The final section of the paper will describe the potential of artificially intelligent devices in the management, organization, and optimization of educational and management resources and interventions of faculty and administrative staff. The ultimate goal of this research is to demonstrate how artificial intelligence can provide the world of education with important support in all its dimensions. As a useful tool for achieving optimal management and organization of educational institutions and aimed at the dissemination of knowledge in school and academic contexts.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Artificial Intelligence and new perspectives in traditional education</title>
      <p>In recent decades, the emphasis of the relationship between man and machine becomes increasingly
evident. In the age of software culture, the conscious use of technology becomes a fundamental
component of society. Its use shapes languages, outlines new scenarios for social interaction,
influencing the totality of dimensions that characterize human doing and thinking, challenging the
classical categories with which individuals interpret the world [1]. The use of technologies
significantly affects most aspects typically considered relevant to the human dimension. Thanks to
communication technologies, online modes of interaction "deconstruct localized space, of Cartesian
conception, redetermine and delocalize it globally" [2]. Technologies, which have now become
intelligent, have invaded all fields of knowledge, creating new ways of perceiving reality by
bringing about an enhancement of physical and psychic processes [3]. In this age of technology,
media represent an extension, a walkable bridge to reach others, enabling us to realize and
consolidate meaningful relationships. Such tools are artifacts of ingenuity and are subservient to
the human propensity to perfect one's abilities, skills and possibilities. The social function that such
tools are called upon to perform in the community is to indulge a need, as overt as it is intimate,</p>
      <p>2020 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
that is typical of man, namely to communicate. The concept of communication is encapsulated in
the human dimension. Man communicates, consciously and unconsciously, ideas, concepts and
knowledge, "pooling" information processed according to the rules of a given code [4], to satisfy
that need to feel an integral and functional part of a community made up of one's fellow human
beings, united by common goals, such as the sustenance and survival of the species [5]. The
potential expressed by technologies in satisfying man's atavistic need for communication has made
their use indispensable in any context, especially in education. Their use has caused a
communicative revolution that challenges the world of teaching and education [6]. So-called
"digital communication" has caused an orderly and virtuous reversal of educational patterns through
the integration of media devices capable of making dialogic exchange highly interactive in the
educational context. Thanks to the use of technological devices in educational practice, the learner
is no longer a simple passive terminal of the communication system; he also becomes a user and
producer of services [7]. It is in this scenario that educational informatics, that branch of research
in which information technologies meet educational theories, is situated. The digitization of
learning has led to the spread of IT-based educational solutions such as: virtual reality, social robots,
MOOCs, cloud computing, and Internet of things (Iot). Students' interaction with e-learning
platforms has generated a considerable amount of data. This information thanks to Learning
Analytics can be organized and managed in order to: personalize educational interventions, build
better pedagogical interventions, enhance students' active learning, support at-risk students, and
assess the motivational and psychological factors that affect students' completion [8]. Artificial
intelligence (AI) is used to accomplish this. This is defined as: "The discipline that studies the
theoretical foundations, methodologies and techniques that enable the design of hardware systems
and systems of software programs designed to provide the electronic processor with performance
that, to a common observer, would appear to be the exclusive domain of human intelligence" [9].
Artificial Intelligence (AI) allows cybernetic systems to recreate thoughtful behaviors such as
selecting from a multitude of data those useful in performing a complex and seemingly cogitated
task. The ability of intelligent technologies to solve advanced problems is due to analytical models
that generate predictions, rules, responses and recommendations [10]. These tools thanks to
Machine Learning (ML), or a subset of techniques, theories, methods and technologies in AI, can
learn automatically [11]. Over the past decades, the field of Machine Learning has produced a
number of remarkable and sophisticated algorithms and preprocessing techniques to efficient
machine learning capabilities. Among the most notable advances is Deep Learning (DL), which is
an architecture of artificial neural networks, similar in structure and function to biological neural
networks (ANNs), with improved and high-performance data processing and learning capabilities.
[12]. Deep Learning allows computational models equipped with multiple levels of processing, to
produce representations of data with greater abstraction capabilities [13]. All this makes it possible
to predict with extreme accuracy and precision the outline of a wide range of phenomena, human
behavior included. Despite some concerns, it is possible to see a general perception of the usefulness
of AI in teaching and that the ethics of using virtual assistants play an important role in social reality
[14]. The philosophy behind the use of artificial intelligence for social and educational purposes
sees humans as the ultimate recipients of meaningful interventions mediated by intelligent devices.
This approach to AI is called Human Artificial Intelligence (HAI) and there are two different
conceptions of it. The first sees AI technologies as totally subservient to human control, with a view
to collaboration between parties aimed at enhancing social productivity, with a high level of
reliability, efficiency and security [15]. The second meaning sees AI applied to the human condition
and dimension for the purpose of improving the quality of life. This can be ascertained from the
page of the "HAI Stanford University" website, where a report on the incidence of artificial
intelligence within modern society is periodically prepared and published [16]. Stanford University
reflects on the possible use of intelligent technologies in the most diverse areas of knowledge,
dwelling on how they affect social change, human behavior, the economy, and the worlds of
education and industry. HAI Standford's mission is to "Promote AI research, education, policy and
practice to improve the human condition" [16]. It is according to this human-machine
synergybased perspective that smart learning environments are being set up, centered on people as
recipients of AI benefits. Smart learning environments are set up focusing not only on educational
performance, they are also organized in order to protect the emotional and affective dimension of
students. To make this possible, it was necessary to explore in depth the impacts of smart learning
environments and AI platforms, on the community [17]. The concept of precision education is
introduced within this scenario. This presents itself as a new challenge in the application of AI,
machine learning and deep learning within educational settings [18]. The intent is to improve
student learning by helping them develop effective learning strategies, subject to the use of smart
technologies [19]. Of note, precision education makes use of smart learning, i.e., education based
on the application of big data and AI, to identify at-risk students and provide them with personalized
educational interventions in a timely manner aimed at improving their academic performance. This
is the case with Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS), which aim to provide immediate and
personalized instruction or feedback to students without necessarily involving a human teacher.
The purpose behind the use of such devices is to provide meaningful and effective learning using
information technology. Within ITS there are four different components: the domain model, the
student model, the teaching model and a learning environment or user interface. These systems are
able to vary the complexity of the exercises in relation to the intelligence and abilities of the user.
Because of their ability to process large amounts of data in real time, they can personalize
instruction, administering increasingly complex and researched exercises to proficient students and
providing less sophisticated content that does not require high processing capacity to struggling
students [20]. This ability and that of automatically grading tests administered to students make
them optimal for significantly reducing teacher workload. A key aspect in intelligent tutoring
systems is student interaction with User Interfaces (UIs). These adaptive, digital devices not only
serve as excellent attention catalysts, but also collect and classify input and data obtained from
student interaction. Intelligent technologies are currently being used to recognize learners' attention
levels and emotions, adjust conversational dynamics in computer-supported learning, manage and
develop courses, generate optimal groups for cooperative learning activities, and recognize patterns
that predict school dropout to limit the devastating effects of school dropout [21]. In 2016, an AI
study at the Georgia Institute of Technology introduced Jill Watson, the first artificial tutor in a
university course [22]. The 'artificial assistant, developed on the IBM Watson platform, was
experimented on students without their knowledge. Some of them had guessed, given the speed
with which they received answers to their questions, that they were interfacing with a machine;
others found out at the end of the semester when Prof. Goel revealed it to them, causing a stir in the
student community. Currently, the virtual assistant is still in use, but to allow him or her anonymity
he or she is often renamed, sometimes resorting to female pseudonyms. The teacher shortage has
become a global emergency according to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization [23]. The U.S. Education Commission has also commented on this emergency,
pointing out that the interest of young people in pursuing teacher education programs has declined
[24]. At the same time, an increase in student enrollment of 0.4 percent in public elementary and
secondary schools is evident, with a projected growth of 5.2 percent from 2011 to 2023 reported by
the National Center for Education Statistics [25, 26]. This situation portends the emergence of a
clear educational problem with extremely devastating effects both for students, who would not have
access to a primary education, and for teachers, who due to understaffing are at risk of developing
psychopathologies due to the unsustainable workload. New interventions are needed to support and
promote education, in this regard we find a growing focus on the use of Artificial Intelligence in
Education (AIED). Already Diprose and Buist [27] found that the use of AI brings enormous
benefits in multiple economic and social sectors. The use of such technologies in teaching seems to
be very beneficial since intelligent tutors do not experience job dissatisfaction, leave, rest, anger,
fatigue, etc. Several studies have reported the positive role of robots in learning. They are in fact
useful in limiting absenteeism [28], are supportive in language teaching [29], provide emotional
support to students [30], and promote creativity and problem solving [31]. In response to the
educational emergency reported by UNESCO Manyika and other scholars [32] thought of AI as a
possible solution to enable third world countries to have access to primary education. However, the
exclusive use of AI in education hides several pitfalls, as pointed out by the scholar. Machines
cannot significantly affect the development of students' emotional intelligence, emotional
competence and creativity. People, as social animals, need to interact with other people to learn and
develop skills useful for managing interpersonal relationships. So far, it has been observed how
artificial intelligence provides support for teaching, but there is much discussion about the
possibility of more frequent use of teachers guided by AI-based systems, referred to as Machine
Teachers, in the near future. One futuristic project in the development of a fully AI-managed teacher
was by Edwards and Cheok in 2018 [33], in which they presented a prototype of a robot capable of
teaching autonomously. The scholars argued that it is imperative for effective teaching to also
provide robots with capabilities in managing social interactions, proxemics in the classroom, and
basic effective requirements for emotional support to students during learning. For these reasons,
the project envisions a robot physically present in the classroom, capable of delivering instruction
and applying pedagogical strategies appropriate for managing social interactions in the classroom.
The project envisions the robot teaching STEM disciplines, preferring collaborative learning and a
positivist pedagogical approach, which therefore places the learner at the center of the educational
relationship. The prototype envisioned in the project should promote student engagement,
motivation and interest, and effective assessment with immediate feedback. To meet these
requirements in the project, a Sota, "So (cial) ta (lker)," which is a social dialogue robot capable of
moving its eyes, head and body that enable it to mimic human behaviors and support interaction
and conversation skills, was chosen in the project [34]. The Sota can connect to other devices to
create an IoT (Internet of things) network. It is small enough to be easily carried even by a child
and is designed to engage in conversations and evaluations of collected data and then share it with
the class by projecting it on a connected screen. The educational system in which the robot will be
called upon to operate promotes peer learning, discussion, group dialogue and metacognition in one
approach. The robot can acquire the identity of students at the beginning of the lesson, this allows
it to assess students at the end of classroom exercises. During in-class quizzes Sota verifies the
correctness of the answers and associates them with the identity of the students. In a second stage,
the robot initiates a group discussion that will be conducted independently by the students
themselves in class and is able to mimic movements and facial expressions to communicate
approval or disapproval for their conduct. Through movement and changing eye color it simulates
emotions such as anger, sadness, joy and other emotions. This system proposed by the scholars
suggests that it is increasingly fervent within the scientific community that the idea of a school in
which AI is not only supportive of educational practice. The prototype described would be capable
of significantly affecting the school landscape, resulting, as admitted by the scholars, in a
considerable loss of teaching jobs (pp. 356) [34]. Loss that will be duly compensated for by the
emergence of other professional figures within the educational context. It has been analyzed how
the incredible potential of artificial intelligence has and will continue to cause remarkable changes
in the world of traditional face-to-face education, it is incumbent upon us now to analyze how smart
technologies also come in handy within the increasingly used and discussed online education.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Artificial intelligence in online education</title>
      <p>Artificial intelligence has proven positive for improving instruction and the quality of online learning
by offering accurate predictions and assessments and engaging students with virtual materials and
environments [35]. Innovative applications of AI in higher education are conducive to reforming
instructional design and development methods and advancing the construction of an intelligent,
networked, personalized, and lifelong education system [36, 37]. The e-learning segment is undergoing
a major transition with multiple offerings and pedagogical innovations [38]. The pandemic due to
Covid-19 has accelerated the transition to more ICT-mediated teaching, forcing schools and universities
to move to online platforms such as Moodle, Google Classroom, Edmodo, and Power School.
Universities are allowing their students to earn bachelor's and master's degrees online, and the
increasing number of active users in MOOCs courses shows that distance learning methodologies are
appreciated by society [39]. Advances in virtual reality, augmented and artificial reality are observed.
The artificial intelligence market is continuously expanding, in fact many companies are investing in
the artificial intelligence sector as it is profitable. Resorting to it inevitably entails the involvement of
fewer people, leading to the payment of fewer salaries and labor contributions. The conception of AI as
a subordinate employee within companies makes it a major concern within the labor market [40].
Investment in education technology (Edtech) has grown 32-fold since 2010, reaching a total amount
pare to $16.1 billion [41]. Educational interventions in smart technology-mediated education have
provided viable and sustainable solutions to reach rural areas and struggling students. The online
education market uses artificial intelligence to provide cutting-edge services and courses to students
from all walks of life. The online learning market is likely to increase with a CAGR of more than 13
percent in the period between 2020 and 2026 [42]. AI as well as enabling the transition from traditional
to online education makes learning more meaningful, incentivizing better retention of key concepts and
better educational outcomes for students. Teachers are increasingly proficient in the management of
teaching technologies; the use of video conferencing platforms improves student engagement during
lessons. It is possible to assert that microcredentials and blended teaching are no longer understood as
exceptions in today's educational scenario [43]. There are many online platforms that seek to promote
learning and teaching using Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS), Dialogue-Based Tutoring Systems
(DBTS) and Exploratory Learning Environments (ELE). These are widespread in Indonesia. The reason
is the country's conformation, spread over more than 17,000 islands, a natural impediment that has
significantly affected the spread of online learning. The five most widely used platforms in Indonesia
are: Rumah Belajar, Ruangguru, Quipper, Cisco Webex, and Zenius [44]. The most widely used is
Ruangguru, which won the title of best startup in Artificial Intelligence in 2020 at the "G20 Innovation
League," held in Sorrento, Italy in October 2021. According to the G20 website, the company promotes
quality education through innovative methods, products, and services for more than 20 million students
and teachers, ensuring accessibility, affordability, personalization of instruction, and high-quality
content [45]. During the Covid-19 pandemic, Ruangguru made available a free online teaching package
consisting of instructional videos tailored to the grade level and subject studied. There are also various
tests to check the students' level of preparedness. The educational program is part of the Learning
Management Systems (LMS) or Learning Management Systems that allow courses to be delivered in
e-learning mode on the commission of an educational or university institution. The application reaches
15 million students by providing them with information that can be used to plan, monitor, evaluate and
enable continuous learning. It provides information about the users' solution process in real time while
supporting the decision-making process of the service delivery organization, creating a harmonious
flow of reliable and good quality data [46]. The use of these smart technologies can increase the
productivity of university managers while decreasing the need for an intermediate administrative sector
consisting of many staff. All this, without having to give up an efficient, coordinated internal
organization with meaningful working relationships [47]. Another company operating in the E-learning
sector is Embibe Inc. Founded in Mumbai, India, in 2012 by Aditi Avashti. Embibe provides
educational services for students through online platforms. It uses personalized feedback and chatbots
to develop users' educational standards. Chatbots are AI-based software designed to converse with
users; their purpose is to simulate human behavior through sophisticated natural language processing
systems [48]. The chatbot used on Embibe is called "Knowledge Buddy" and was created to help
students reinforce and consolidate learning by asking them questions and correcting them when
necessary. Thanks to Deep Learning an immediate response to questions is provided by the device, this
is possible thanks to the Knowledge Graph, which is a repository of interconnected knowledge and
information that is processed by Content Intelligence AI software to generate questions and answers
instantly. Knowledge Buddy is built using conversational artificial intelligence and state-of-the-art
linguistic and visual models. It is capable of automatically generating and asking questions based on
data previously collected from the learner, answers the learner's questions as the learner engages in the
study of learning content, and is also capable of automatically translating questions and answers into
the language most congenial to the user [49]. The platform that powers Knowledge Buddy is the NLU
Medhas. This is capable of making the knowledge and information held by the domain required to
administer a specific lesson interpretable and understandable [50, 51, 52, 53]. Until now, educational
platforms have been analyzed that involved interaction with systems characterized purely by ITS
intelligent tutoring systems and chatbots. In addition to these, online discussion platforms for
educational purposes are available on the market, where student participation is promoted through the
sharing of educational content. "Packback," a specialized discussion platform that supports online
learning and teaching by resorting to Gamification, and "Canvas LMS," an AI system for learning
management that produces an automated and holistic approach aimed at learner growth, will be
examined. Packback is designed to support teachers in monitoring and evaluating discussions while
engaging learners through rapid feedback and playful learning elements. The platform does not allow
the dissemination of posts that do not meet minimum sharing requirements, such as word count and
non-plagiarized document content. It is also able to assign each content shared by users a "Curiosity
Score." In fact, thanks to an algorithm, it evaluates the post according to three quality criteria:
relevancedepth, credibility and mode of presentation. It can reward posts on the platform by analyzing the number
of characters used, sentence structure, the quality of quotations given and the formatting of the content.
Inappropriate posts are flagged by the platform and subjected to human review by moderators to see if
they need to be removed [54]. Within online platforms, settings pertaining to discussion structure can
significantly affect user participation [55]. A significant feature of PackBack is that students, because
of interaction on the platform and participation in the discussions established at the end of the lesson,
are awarded points, which are reported on the "Learner Leaderboard." This feature realizes a
leaderboard that makes a widely discussed post visible until the end of a semester. The Packback feed
arranges discussions by employing different types of criteria. The posts that are most recent, most
interesting, with the highest number of responses, or of higher quality can be filtered and easily
intercepted by users. With reference to the modes of interaction, it is found that teachers can positively
affect the motivation of learners by posting positive feedback publicly or by providing private coaching
to them. This relationship with the teacher is a key component of the Community of Inquiry (COI)
model [56] all due to the fact that frequent interaction between the parties results in behaviors typically
associated with an in-presence teaching context [57]. Canvas Learning Management System (LMS), on
the other hand, is an AI platform that is particularly prevalent in thousands of universities in the United
States and internationally, with a growing presence in the Primary, Secondary and Academic Education
markets. The platform's reach is nearly global and plans to extend further into Central and South
American education markets [58]. Canvas is valued by its users; in the fall of 2018, a satisfaction survey
of 4278 users of the platform found that 32.9 percent of students use Canvas from their smartphones
and 45.4 percent via laptops, and that about 60 percent of these were satisfied with the LMS [59].
Canvas is able to assess students in real time allowing academic institutions to check the effectiveness
of teaching and learning strategies. Canvas Instructure is being used by K-12 students, college students,
and companies that set up development programs for their employees to ensure that they receive quality
continuing education. According to the website, Canvas Instructure "has connected millions of
instructors and students belonging to more than 4,000 primary and secondary education institutions and
companies worldwide." This feat has been made possible thanks to Amazon Web Services, which has
enabled Instructure to be "creative without friction" and difficulty [60]. Among the tools offered by
Canvas Instructure we find: statistics on quizzes, instant assessments including from IOS and Android
mobile devices, polls, notifications to email and social media accounts, exchange of audio and video
between users, repository of learning objects, Learning Tool Integrations (LTI), Web conferencing, and
customizable individual profiles that stimulate the sharing of students' personal data [61]. It can be
inferred that these features make it easier for people to learn, but according to Madden's report, all of
this exacerbates the harm done to community members who lack sufficient resources to have access to
Instructure. By not having their data collected, strategies to allow them personalized instruction on par
with other users are also lost [62]. Thanks to Canvas' Open Apps site, it is possible for users to install
apps provided by other companies and then use them in Canvas LMS. It is allowed to use Zoom for
video conferencing, Evernote for notetaking, ASPIR-EEDU for monitoring teachers' performance. All
of this allows Canvas to boast a transversality, or rather a "longitudinality," that allows for a complete
picture of user performance, whether students or faculty. Canvas in recent times has been embroiled
within a diatribe inherent in the management of student data collected from interaction with the
platform. To test the vulnerability of its software, it has turned to outside private companies. This has
caused an uproar, as having access to similar data is coveted by many companies in the industry.
Although there are some safeguards in reference to privacy, retrieval and management of user data, a
collaboration between public education and private company generates permanent tension among the
population [63]. Canvas claims that third parties have access to user data through cookies and web
beacons to improve the quality of its services. However, it assured that individual user data on
Instructure are anonymized [61], and that the fact that these are collected in Amazon Web Service
should not cause a stir because they are not used. "They are just there" [60]. This scenario makes it clear
that despite the potential of smart technologies, there is a need to intervene with data protection
measures. This leaves room for deep discussion considerations in terms of ethics, transparency and
fairness in the management of even users' digital identities. Similar issues, while so sensitive, will not
be researched in the following study. A final educational frontier affecting the world of education is
that of Virtual Reality (VR). This is managed by AI systems and its use in the educational process
enhances the educational experience by making it more stimulating [64]. Virtual reality takes the form
of a computer-generated immersive three-dimensional visualization with which the user can interact
[65]. Various platforms are available that can enrich the educational experience of learners within
educational and university institutions such as: Oculus Rift, Samsung Gear VR, Google Cardboard. 2D
environments that ensure education through different synchronous platforms can induce Zoom fatigue
in learners [66]. In contrast, asynchronous platforms are affected by emotional isolation, significantly
negatively affecting motivation and participation, leading to high dropout rates among students [67]. In
the case of virtual reality, this is not the case thanks in part to the user's construction of a cybernetic,
fictional identity through the use of an avatar [68]. Identification with one's avatar can have a profound
psychological impact on behavior and learning; in fact, experiences in a virtual context have a direct
influence on human behavior, affecting the physical world as well. This phenomenon is called the
Proteus effect [69]. The avatar allows one to experience direct interaction with the environment,
creating the psychological perception of being within a space, experiencing telepresence and the
perceptual illusion of non-mediation [70]. Telepresence shared with other subjects is referred to as
"copresence." Being able to interact with other users and avatars within a virtual space in three dimensions,
recognizing other people allows one to experience the power of co-presence, a key element in building
virtual communities aimed at educational inquiry [71]. The integration of virtual reality and thus
artificial intelligence is useful in educational settings to make the subject experience uncomfortable
situations as a problematic manifestation by the learner several times, with the intent then to learn how
to handle them [72]. Four stages in the virtual social relationship have been identified and described as
useful for the implementation of such technologies in pedagogy. In the first phase, the teacher guides
the learner through a multimodal experience by making him or her a viewer of a 360° video or YouTube
VR. In the second phase, learners have elementary interactions with the virtual environment. In the
third, the acquisition of greater autonomy is stimulated by letting them move freely within Google
Hearth VR. In the final stage they resort to the "presence" first described [73]. In the field of virtual
reality, since Mark Zuckerberg announced the official birth of the Metaverse, the idea of its use in
education is gaining momentum [71]. The Metaverse is conceived as a place where users can meet,
socialize and interact without any kind of limitation or restriction. Two principles dominate it:
interconnection to software and the possibility for users to teleport to other worlds. Seven rules apply
in it: there is only one Metaverse, it belongs to everyone, it is controlled by the community, it is open,
hardware-independent, connected to the Web, and no other Metaverse or Multiverse will ever exist.
The potential of this virtual place in education is very innovative and of boundless potential. It could
be used for laboratory simulations, surgical skills development, and STEM education. Immersive
journalism. Because of its ability to capture 360-degree photos, it could bring audiences experiences
and events in remote places to life in a direct way [74]. It could be used for distance education without
the problems attributable to 2D platforms. It is certainly capable of ensuring active, formally and
informally rich as well as emotionally engaging learning experiences for the learner. It could see the
involvement of Spatial Computing, i.e., a technology that allows the control of technological devices
with gestures and words [75]. Through brain-computer interfaces, it could allow users to communicate
solely through their own brain activity [76]. It could enable people who are paralyzed or limbless to use
a pc. A fusion of cutting-edge technologies such as AI, educational robotics, Cloud Computing, and the
Metaverse is envisioned. This digital revolution could see as its protagonist precisely this alternative
universe, capable of ferrying the world of education into the era of Education 4.0 [71]. The analysis
addressed so far of AI systems supporting education and training are the central focus of this research
paper. So far, it has analyzed how AI platforms are widely used by students, ensuring that they receive
concrete support during their study activities. Artificial intelligence is clearly an effective support tool
to support, and sometimes disrupt, the paradigms of education of students of all grades and belonging
to any educational institution. It is necessary to delve into how such technologies are perceived by the
teacher component. There is a need to analyze their potential and critical issues, to understand what
challenges teachers will face in order to provide optimal training for their learners subject to the use of
AI-based technologies. This is what will be analyzed in the next section of the paper.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. The support of artificial intelligence to educational offerings</title>
      <p>Artificial intelligence emerges as a useful tool not only for the full education of students. Its
functionality can also be found in the administrative and teaching sectors in all levels of education,
including higher education. Artificial intelligence applications (AIAs) provide help to teachers in the
form of Learning Analytics (LA), Virtual Reality (VR), Grading/Assessments (G/A) and Admissions,
minimizing the tasks of the administrative technical sector and teachers. AIA reduces the workload of
faculty, including during the assessment phase, consequently ensuring a significant improvement in
educational delivery towards learners [77]. AI is assisting education organizations on two different
levels: administrative and academic. In the former, it is used in admissions, counseling, and to provide
library services; in the academic sector, on the other hand, it helps to provide immediate and stimulating
feedback and evaluations, ensuring constant mentoring about the entire student community. AI is a
topic that increasingly can be found in every sector and social sphere, especially in education [78].
There are different types of algorithms for managing administration and teaching. In the administrative
sector, in order to fulfill all duties, teaching staff are often used. Artificial intelligence is used for this,
as it can bring great benefits in carrying out such tasks as: personalized instruction, learning analytics
and admissions management. It is the right of every student to see himself or herself meticulously
monitored throughout his or her education; however, it remains difficult to ensure personalized
intervention without the help of state-of-the-art technologies and educational tools. Artificial
intelligence, especially in educational settings with limited budgets, succeeds in providing
individualized tutoring to students, especially those who are struggling. AI allows each student to learn
according to his or her own mental abilities, intelligence type, and learning style [79]. Practices typically
attributed to teachers, such as assessing learners' performance, interacting with learners' parents, are
now supported by AI. All this allows faculty to focus more on relevant tasks, such as devoting more
attention to motivated and participatory learners, supervising projects, and participating in academic
discussions [80]. AI is used for the analysis of job applications. Such systems automatically identify
criteria to be applied in the selection of applicants by arranging guidelines to be followed in interviews
[81]. AI devices do not replace administrative and teaching staff; they are simply supportive of the work
activity. They are very supportive during the admission phase of trainees from any department by being
able to manage the procedure in a very short period [82]. The function of AI systems is managerial in
nature unlike information and communication technologies that are used for purely technical matters.
An increasingly widespread application of such systems is at the time of student assessment. They can
apply student-centered performance measurement models, providing them with immediate and
unbiased judgment. This application has come in very handy in the pandemic period. Teaching because
of Covid has shifted to e-learning platforms such as Learning Management Systems, Massive Open
Online Courses (MOOCs), MOODEL, and it has been difficult for teachers to assess each and every
student's assignment online [83], for which purpose automated systems from clustering algorithms and
deep learning have been used [84]. The usefulness of AI is not bound only to assessment and tutoring
during teaching and learning. Systems first described as chatbots are used to assist students during the
application and admission phase of college by greatly speeding up the process. Since these are capable
of simulating human conversations they manage to guide people during the enrollment phase of degree
and training courses, consequently decreasing the workload of technical and administrative staff. The
chatbot ensures a complete and comprehensive 24/7 service [85] and consequently avoids the
accumulation and procrastination of many purely bureaucratic procedures. AI also can be applied in the
context of analyzing student learning. This process in research is understood as a model to be applied
for predicting student learning as a result of data collected from the interaction between the two domains
[86]. All this makes clear the great impact that Artificial Intelligence has had and is having in the world
of education and the organization of school and academic administrations, as well as with regard to the
teachers themselves, no longer obliged to deal with every single aspect of teaching but rather seeing
them involved, thanks to AI, only within those that are most formative and stimulating for themselves
and their students. So many are the challenges to which AI has subjected teachers and so many are the
improvements it has brought to the world of teaching by preventing school dropout [87], monitoring
student progress, and assessing student work in a reliable and automated manner [88]. Unfortunately,
the use of AI in education is less applied than in other fields. As argued by Celik to other scholars [89],
one solution to this issue would be the involvement of teachers in the design, testing, and development
phase of educational smart technologies, so that they can consolidate skills in the management of such
devices that would contribute daily to the improvement of educational delivery and practice. Allowing
those who teach and those who administer to employ AI technologies of such boundless potential during
training and specialization courses inevitably results in immediate educational progress for the school
and academic system. The synergistic relationship between intelligences, whether human or artificial,
will ferry society toward new educational, communicative and social scenarios. Perspectives then
translated into more efficient, evolved and performing realities, attentive to the training and
psychophysical health of people. Intent, thanks to research and technology, to ensure the achievement
of greater well-being for the entire community.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Conclusions</title>
      <p>Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were identified in the 2015 United Nations Development
Program (UNDP). The Oxford Initiative on AIxSDGs seeks to determine how artificial intelligence has
been and can be used in the future to promote the sustainable development goals first mentioned [90].
The intent at Oxford is to pursue ethically sound design aimed at addressing and solving societal issues
of global significance through the potential of AI. The projects promoted by the organization all cover
areas of undeniable relevance to humanity, which has been bedeviled in recent times, as never before,
by suffering battles that undermine the integrity of the individual and society. Among goals such as:
the defeat of poverty, the defeat of hunger, health and well-being, gender equality, clean and affordable
energy, decent work and economic growth, we find the one that most interests this study, namely,
quality education. Artificial intelligence, since its official birth in 1956 at Dartmouth College in
Hanover, has revolutionized by improving people's lives over time. Consider how in the Philippines
and India millions of students thanks to intelligent educational platforms are assured the right to
education, enshrined as inviolable, inalienable and fundamental to man and citizen. This shows that
similar technologies, used in a consonant manner, are very powerful tools that are useful in achieving
greater social justice. An intelligent machine can collect data during the interaction with the learner,
and then simultaneously identify and prepare the most useful educational strategy for the learner's
education, all of which is sealed by the most transparent, impartial and timely assessment to the learner's
work. The world of education integrates technologies into teaching processes, according to increasingly
complex schemes [91], because their use contributes to the mental and physical well-being of students
[92, 93]. Such devices allow teachers to invest their time and energy more effectively, without being
absorbed by bureaucratic and administrative commitments that could, at times, cause teaching to fall
by the wayside. AI is the tool and potential vehicle useful in making concrete and possible a quality
education, accessible to all, that effectively supports the growth of educands and educators. Scenarios
are posed before us that are futuristic, as in the case of Zuckerberg's Metaverse, which has the right
potential to provide a very strong impetus to distance education, making it experienced by all as in
presence and in a more meaningful way, especially in reference to educational intervention aimed at
the training of students who have disabilities, physical dysfunctions and therefore with special
educational needs. We are analog beings, projected into the Infosphere where we regularly share our
experiences with intelligent agents [94], seeking greater well-being and a better quality of life. The
evaluation of a technologically intelligent device, regarding its use in pedagogy and education, besides
being accurate and unbiased, would certainly be positive. This is because the digital increases the
possibilities of interaction between humans and at the same time allows them to find a link between the
phenomena that characterize modernity. This increasingly solid relationship between society and
technology breaks down distances because it creates communicative bridges between people. It elevates
the potential of users by guiding them to a modernity free of limiting boundaries. It projects the world
of education toward new scenarios, such as that of best educating the totality of students. By virtue of
a future that increasingly conceives technologies as tools aimed at the dissemination of knowledge and
useful for society to freely form itself.
5. References
[24] S. Aragon, Teacher Shortages: What We Know. Teacher Shortage Series, Education Commission
of the States, 2016.
[25] K. Mussman, Previous Lake-Savage Area Schools: U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon</p>
      <p>
        Schools, " Previous Lake-Savage Area: U.S. Department of Education, 2016.
[26] S. Provasnik, A. KewalRamani, M. M. Coleman, L. Gilbertson, W. Herring, Q. Xie, Status of
education in rural America, US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Institute of Education Sciences, 2007.
[27] W. Diprose, N. Buist, Artificial intelligence in medicine: humans need not apply?, N Z Med J,
2016;129(1434):73-6. PMID: 27349266.
[28] M. A. Mac Iver, D. J. Mac Iver," STEMming" the Swell of Absenteeism in Urban Middle Grade
Schools: Impacts of a Summer Robotics Program, Society for Research on Educational
Effectiveness, 2014.
[29] S. Tegos, S. Demetriadis, T. Tsiatsos, A configurable conversational agent to trigger students’
productive dialogue: A pilot study in the CALL domain. International Journal of Artificial
Intelligence in Education 24 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ), pp. 62–91, 2014, doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0007-3.
[30] M. Dennis, J. Masthoff, C. Mellish, Adapting progress feedback and emotional support to learner
personality, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 26 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ), pp. 877–931, 2016,
doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0059-7.
[31] E, Liu, Z. Feng, C. H. Lin, P. Y. Liou, H. C. Feng, and H. T. Hou, An analysis of teacher-student
interaction patterns in a robotics course for kindergarten children: A pilot study. Turkish Online
Journal of Educational Technology 12 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ), 2013, pp. 9–18.
[32] J. Manyika, M. Chui, M. Miremadi, J. Bughin, K. George, P. Willmott, M. Dewhurst, A future that
works: Automation, employment, and productivity, New York:McKinsey Global Institute, no.
      </p>
      <p>
        January, 2017, pp. 1–28.
[33] B. I. Edwards, A. D. Cheok, Why not robot teachers: artificial intelligence for addressing teacher
shortage, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 32(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ), 2018, pp. 345-360.
[34] Osaka University, Development of social dialogue robots ‘commu’ and ‘sota’, Research at Osaka
      </p>
      <p>
        University, 2015, http://resou.osaka-u.ac.jp/en/research/2015/20150120_2.
[35] C. Yang, S. Huan, Y. Yang, A practical teaching mode for colleges supported by artificial
intelligence, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ), 2020, pp.
195-206.
[36] F. Ouyang, P. Jiao, Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms, Computers and
      </p>
      <p>Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020, 2021.
[37] B. Arsovic, N. Stefanovic, E-learning based on the adaptive learning model: case study in Serbia,</p>
      <p>
        Sādhanā, 45(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ), 2020, pp. 1-13.
[38] R. Sharma, M. Mohan, Artificial Intelligence and E-Learning: Best Practices Across the Globe, In
Adoption and Implementation of AI in Customer Relationship Management , IGI Global, 2022,
pp. 1-25.
[39] L. R. Octaberlina, A. I. Muslimin, EFL Students Perspective towards Online Learning Barriers and
Alternatives Using Moodle/Google Classroom during COVID-19 Pandemic, International Journal
of Higher Education, Springer, 9(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ), pp. 1-9, 2020.
[40] P. Bisconti, D. Orsitto, L'intelligenza artificiale e il mercato dell'ozio, 2021.
[41] B. Williamson, Meta-edtech. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ), pp. 1-5, 2021.
[42] Global E-learning Market-Research and Markets. - Outlook and Forecast 2021-2026, 2021.
      </p>
      <p>
        Retrieved on July 10, 2021, from:
https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5327504/globale-learningmarket-outlook-and-forecast
[43] M. I. Qureshi, N. Khan, H. Raza, A. Imran, F. Ismail, Digital Technologies in Education 4.0, Does
it Enhance the Effectiveness of Learning? A Systematic Literature Review, International Journal
of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ), 2021.
[44] D. Indriyani, K. D. Solihati, An Overview of Indonesian’s Challenging Future. In 2nd International
      </p>
      <p>
        Conference on Administration Science 2020 (ICAS 2020), pp. 279-284, Atlantis Press, 2021.
[45] G20 Innovation League (2021), Online,
https://www.g20innovationleague.com/azienda/ruangguru visited on 08/05/2022.
[46] B. Badrudin, M. Khusnuridlo, M. Z. El Wahyu, The influence of learning management information
system and service quality on the customer satisfaction of Ruangguru application. Cypriot Journal
of Educational Sciences, 17(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ), 2022, pp. 148-158.
[47] I. S. Lisetskaya, A. Y. Kovalishin, Implementation of Distance Training in Quarantine At the
Department of Paediatric Dentistry of Ivano Frankivsk National Medical University. Actual
Problems of the Modern Medicine: Bulletin of Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, 20(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ),
2020, pp. 241–244, https://doi.org/10.31718/2077-1096.20.3.241
[48] M. L. Mauldin, Chatterbots, tinymuds, and the turing test: Entering the loebner prize competition.
      </p>
      <p>In AAAI, Vol. 94, 1994, pp. 16-21.
[49] Embibe Inc., Knowledge Buddy, Web, 2022, URL:
https://www.embibe.com/ai-ineducation/articles/track?id=4 , visited on 04/04/2022.
[50] K. Faldu, A. Sheth, P. Kikani, H. Akbari, KI-BERT: Infusing knowledge context for better
language and domain understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08145, 2021.
[51] M. Gaur, A. Desai, K. Faldu, A. Sheth, Explainable AI Using Knowledge Graphs, In ACM
CoDS</p>
      <p>
        COMAD Conference, 2020.
[52] M. Gaur, K. Faldu, A. Sheth, Semantics of the black-box: Can knowledge graphs help make deep
learning systems more interpretable and explainable?, IEEE Internet Computing, 25(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ), 2021, pp.
51-59.
[53] A. Sheth, M. Gaur, K. Roy, K. Faldu, Knowledge-intensive language understanding for
explainable ai, IEEE Internet Computing, 25(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ), 2021, pp. 19-24.
[54] C. Hudson, A. Archibald, T. Heap, Integrating an AI-driven discussion platform: The impact of
platform on engagement and quality. In EDEN Conference Proceedings, 1, 2020 pp. 117-126.
[55] J. Hewitt, How Habitual Online Practices Affect the Development of Asynchronous Discussion
      </p>
      <p>
        Threads, 2003.
[56] J. M. Zydney, A. deNoyelles, K. K. J. Seo, Creating a community of inquiry in online
environments: An exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous
discussions. Computers &amp; Education, 58(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ), 2012, pp. 77-87.
[57] D. L. Schallert, A. J. Sanders, K.M. Williams, E. Seo, L.T. Yu, J. S. Vogler, M.C. Knox, Does it
matter if the teacher is there?: A teacher's contribution to emerging patterns of interactions in online
classroom discussions, Computers &amp; Education, 82, 2015, pp. 315-328.
[58] Hill, Phil, “Movement of Canvas LMS to Global Markets, 2017, eLiterate.
      </p>
      <p>
        https://mfeldstein.com/movement-canvas-lms-global-markets/.
[59] R. Marachi, L. Quill, The case of Canvas: Longitudinal datafication through learning management
systems. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ), 2020, pp. 418-434.
[60] Amazon Web Services [YouTube Channel]. August 4, 2015. "Infrastructure delivers online
learning. Using AWS globally. " Video clip at
2:49.https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/casestudies/instructure/.
[61] Infrastructure.2019."Canvas,features".https://www.instructure.com/canvas/features/higheristruzi
one? newhome = canvas
[62] M. Madden, M. Gilman, K. Levy, A. Marwick, Privacy, poverty, and big data: A matrix of
vulnerabilities for poor Americans. Wash. UL Rev.,2017, pp. 95- 53.
[63] J.R. Reidenberg, F. Schaub, Achieving big data privacy in education. Theory and Research in
      </p>
      <p>
        Education, 16(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ), 2018, pp. 263-279.
[64] L. O. Gbenga, O. T. Oluwafunto, A.H. Oluwatobi, An Improved Rapid Response Model for
      </p>
      <p>
        University Admission Enquiry System Using Chatbot. Int. J. Comput, 38(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ), 2020, pp. 123-131.
[65] G. Bell, A. Parisi, M. Pesce, The virtual reality modeling language. vol. Version, 1, 1995.
[66] N. Yee, J. Bailenson, The proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior.
      </p>
      <p>
        Hum. Commun. Res. 33, 2007, pp. 271–290.
[67] R. M. Anderson, H. Heesterbeek, D. Klinkenberg, T. D. Hollingsworth, How will country-based
mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet, 395(10228),
pp. 931–934, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
        )30567-5
[68] B. Dalgarno, M. J. W. Lee, What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? Br. J.
      </p>
      <p>Educ. Technol, 41, 2010, pp 10–32.
[69] N. Yee, J. Bailenson, The proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior.</p>
      <p>
        Hum. Commun. Res. 33, 2007, pp. 271–290.
[70] M. Lombard, T. Ditton. At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of
computermediated communication, 3(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ), JCMC321, 1997.
[71] S. Mystakidis, Motivation enhancement methods for community building in extended reality. In
      </p>
      <p>
        Augmented and Mixed Reality for Communities, CRC Press, 2021 pp. 265-282.
[72] K. Kim, L. Boelling, S. Haesler, J. Bailenson, G. Bruder, G. F. Welch, Does a digital assistant need
a body? The influence of visual embodiment and social behavior on the perception of intelligent
virtual agents in AR, In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality
(ISMAR), 2018, pp. 105-114.
[73] S. Bambury, The depths of the VR v2.0 model. Available online:
https://www.virtualiteach.com/post/the-depths-of-vr-model-v2-0, accessed on 11/05/2022.
[74] N. De la Peña, P. Weil, J. Llobera, B. Spanlang, D. Friedman, M.V. Sanchez-Vives, M. Slater,
Immersive journalism: immersive virtual reality for the first-person experience of news. Presence,
19(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ), 2010, pp. 291-301.
[75] J. Delmerico, R. Poranne, F. Bogo, H. Oleynikova, E. Vollenweider, E., S. Coros, M. Pollefeys,
Spatial Computing and Intuitive Interaction: Bringing Mixed Reality and Robotics Together. arXiv
preprint arXiv:2202.01493, 2022.
[76] S. Kim, S. Lee, H. Kang, S. Kim, M. Ahn, P300 Brain–Computer Interface-Based Drone Control
in Virtual and Augmented Reality. Sensors, 21(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ), 5765, 2021.
[77] S. F. Ahmad, M. M. Alam, M. Rahmat, M.S. Mubarik, S. I. Hyder, Academic and Administrative
      </p>
      <p>
        Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Sustainability, 14(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ), 1101, 2022.
[78] J. M. Reid, Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Heinle &amp; Heinle Publishers, International
      </p>
      <p>Thomson Publishing Book Distribution Center, 7625 Empire Drive, Florence, KY 41042, 1995.
[79] R. J. Mislevy, D. Yan, J. Gobert, M. Sao Pedro, Automated scoring in intelligent tutoring systems.</p>
      <p>
        In Handbook of automated scoring (pp. 403-422). Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2020.
[80] A. Larrabee Sønderlund, E. Hughes, J. Smith, The efficacy of learning analytics interventions in
higher education: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ), 2019,
pp. 2594-2618.
[81] J. D. Gobert, M. A. Sao Pedro, T.S. Baker, E. Toto, O. Montalvo, Leveraging educational data
mining for real-time performance assessment of scientific inquiry skills within microworlds.
      </p>
      <p>
        Journal of Educational Data Mining, 4(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ), 2012, pp. 104-143.
[82] N. Goksel, A. Bozkurt, Artificial intelligence in education: Current insights and future
perspectives. In Handbook of Research on Learning in the Age of Transhumanism (pp. 224-236).
      </p>
      <p>
        IGI Global, 2019.
[83] B. Lorica, Semi-automatic method for grading a million homework assignments,2013, Online at
http://radar. oreilly.
com/2013/10/semi-automatic-method-for-grading-a-millionhomeworkassignments. html. Accessed 11/05/2022,
[84] S. Combéfis, Automated Code Assessment for Education: Review, Classification and Perspectives
on Techniques and Tools. Software, 1(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ), 2022, pp. 3-30.
[85] L. Cui, S. Huang, F. Wei,C. Tan, C. Duan, M. Zhou, Superagent: A customer service chatbot for
e-commerce websites. In Proceedings of ACL 2017, system demonstrations , 2017, pp. 97-102.
[86] G. J. Hwang, H. Xie, B. W. Wah, D. Gašević, Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of
Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001,
2020.
[87] S. A. Popenici, S. Kerr, Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in
higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ), 2017, pp. 1-13.
[88] A. Okada, D. Whitelock, W. Holmes, C. Edwards, e-Authentication for online assessment: A
mixed-method study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ), 2019, pp. 861–875.
[89] I. Celik, M. Dindar, H. Muukkonen, S. Järvelä, The Promises and Challenges of Artificial
      </p>
      <p>Intelligence for Teachers: a Systematic Review of Research. TechTrends, 2022, pp. 1-15.
[90] Aiforsdgs, Said Business School 2022, Oxford, accessed 13/04/2022, URL:
https://www.aiforsdgs.org/
[91] G. A. Toto, P. Limone, New Perspectives for Using the Model of the Use and Acceptance of
Technology in Smart Teaching, In International Workshop on Higher Education Learning
Methodologies and Technologies Online, Springer, Cham, 2020, pp. 115-125.
[92] L. Pierpaolo, G. A. Toto, The psychological constructs and dimensions applied to sports
performance: a change of theoretical paradigms. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18,
2034, 2018.
[93] G. A. Toto, P. Limone, Self-directed learning: An innovative strategy for sport and physical
education. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2019, 14(Proc4), S568-S577.
doi:10.14198/jhse.2019.14. Proc4.14
[94] L. Floridi, Digital ethics online and off. American Scientist, 4(109), 2021.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Buffardi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Futuri possibili: Formazione, innovazione, culture digitali</article-title>
          .
          <source>EGEA spa</source>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Fragnito</surname>
          </string-name>
          , La Rete della didattica,
          <source>Pensa multimedia, Lecce</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>87</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>88</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>D. De Kerckhove</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Brainframes: Technology, mind and business,
          <source>utrecht (ola)</source>
          ,
          <source>bosch &amp; Keuning</source>
          ,
          <year>1991</year>
          ; tr. it. Brainframes. Mente, tecnologia, mercato,
          <year>1993</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Martini</surname>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>V.M. Mastronardi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Il mondo della comunicazione: comunicazione non verbale (CNV), programmazione neuro-linguistica (PNL) e strategie di persuasione</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Watzlawick</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
            <surname>Beavin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. D</given-names>
            .
            <surname>Jackson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>LA COMUNICAZIONE UMANA</source>
          ,
          <year>1976</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Doni</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Comunicazione digitale e nuovi media: una sfida per l'educazione</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Rivoltella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>La comunicazione nell'era digitale. Prospettive di intervento formativo. In Identità e missione di una Facoltà di Comunicazione di una Università Cattolica</article-title>
          , Pontificia Università Lateranense,
          <year>2008</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Casalino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Grilli</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Limone</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Santoro</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Schicchi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Deep learning for knowledge tracing in learning analytics: an overview</article-title>
          , teleXbe,
          <year>2021</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Intelligenza</surname>
            <given-names>artificiale</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Treccani.it - Vocabolario Treccani on line,
          <source>Istituto dell'Enciclopedia Italiana</source>
          , URL: https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/intelligenza-artificiale_
          <article-title>%28Enciclopediadella-Scienza-e-della-</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tecnica</surname>
          </string-name>
          %
          <volume>29</volume>
          / , consulted on 19/03/
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Janiesch</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Zschech</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Heinrich</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Machine learning and deep learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>Electronic Markets</source>
          ,
          <volume>31</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <year>2021</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>685</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>695</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Barone</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Machine Learning e Intelligenza Artificiale-Metodologie per lo sviluppo di sistemi automatici</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Dario Flaccovio Editore</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Goodfellow</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Bengio</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Courville</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Deep learning</article-title>
          , The MIT Press,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>LeCun</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Y. Bengio, G. Hinton,
          <article-title>Deep learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>Nature</source>
          ,
          <volume>521</volume>
          (
          <issue>7553</issue>
          ),
          <year>2015</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>436</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>444</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Agrusti</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Bonavolontà, Artificial Intelligence and
          <article-title>Education: the perceptions of the students of the Department of</article-title>
          <source>Educational Sciences at Roma Tre University on the concept of Artificial Intelligence</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Shneiderman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Human-centered artificial intelligence: Reliable, safe</article-title>
          &amp; trustworthy,
          <source>International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction</source>
          ,
          <volume>36</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>495</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>504</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <article-title>Stanford institute for human-centered artificial intelligence</article-title>
          , https://hai.stanford.edu/ , consulted on 22/03/
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. J. H.</given-names>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Precision education: New challenges for AI in education</article-title>
          ,
          <source>In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE)</source>
          (pp.
          <article-title>XXVII-XXVIII). Kenting, Taiwan: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE</article-title>
          ),
          <year>2019</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Ogata</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Matsui</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Human-centered artificial intelligence in education: Seeing the invisible through the visible</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          ,
          <issue>100008</issue>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Tempelaar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Rienties</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Nguyen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The contribution of dispositional learning analytics to precision education</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Educational Technology &amp; Society</source>
          ,
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <year>2021</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>109</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>122</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Freedman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.S.</given-names>
            <surname>Ali</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>S. McRoy</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Links: what is an intelligent tutoring system?</article-title>
          , intelligence,
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <year>2000</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>15</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>16</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Nkambou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Azevedo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Vassileva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 14th International Conference, ITS</source>
          <year>2018</year>
          , Montreal, QC, Canada,
          <source>Proceedings</source>
          (Vol.
          <volume>1085</volume>
          ),
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <surname>A.K. Goel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Joyner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Using AI to teach AI: Lessons from an online AI class</article-title>
          .
          <source>AI Magazine</source>
          ,
          <volume>38</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <year>2017</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>48</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>59</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          [23] UNESCO, “
          <article-title>The Challenge of Teacher Shortage and Quality: Have We Succeeded in Getting Enough Quality Teachers into Classrooms?” In 12th Session of the Joint ILO/UNESCO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 359 Committee of Experts on the Application of the Recommendations Concerning Teaching Personnel (CEART</article-title>
          ), Paris, (
          <year>2015</year>
          ),
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>9</lpage>
          . Paris: GMR and UNESCO
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>