<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>A Coruña, Spain.
$ maria.miro@ua.es (M. M. Maestre)</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Communicative Intentions Annotation Scheme for Natural Language Processing Applications</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>María Miró Maestre</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Software and Computing Systems, University of Alicante</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>03690 Alicante</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>000</volume>
      <fpage>0</fpage>
      <lpage>0001</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Communicative intentions are one of the linguistic elements that usually determine the content of any message we want to express in our social interactions. With the purpose of contributing to the improvement of natural language processing systems, this thesis aims to create a communicative intention annotation scheme based on the taxonomy presented in the Speech Act Theory. In this way, language processing tools could consider communicative intentions as a starting point to help classify any message and its content depending first on the intention it reflects. To do so, the scheme will be created with the help of an already annotated corpus of Spanish tweets and subsequently evaluated by external annotators so that we can confirm the appropriateness and reliability of the tagged intentions before applying the scheme to an NLP system. Thus, it will be possible to check up to which point communicative intentions can improve the identification of the purpose of a message in an already created NLP system so that we can gain more linguistic information from any text automatically.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;communicative intention</kwd>
        <kwd>annotation scheme</kwd>
        <kwd>speech acts</kwd>
        <kwd>natural language generation</kwd>
        <kwd>pragmatics</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction and Motivation</title>
      <p>
        Inside some of the manifold areas that comprise Natural Language Processing (NLP), the
arrival of new ways of computer-mediated interaction between humans -or even humans and
robots- has boosted the evolution of these technology systems. With these advances, those
NLP programmes that could at first identify concrete messages inside a limited dialogue have
moved on to new systems capable of adapting to diferent conversational contexts. These
updated systems usually require more enriched structures with further linguistic knowledge
to successfully fulfil research tasks such as opinion mining, sentiment analysis, or natural
language generation (NLG). In order to create these NLP systems, the process generally done
when including the linguistic information in the software tends to start from the lowest linguistic
level of analysis and then move on to more complex levels such as semantics, if so. However, the
pragmatic level of language is usually set aside given the available resources that each research
project may or not have, as lower levels of linguistic analysis have an easier implementation
in the system [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. Despite this scheme adopted by most researchers when adding linguistic
information to their programmes, pragmatics is starting to be considered a fundamental element
of analysis to successfully apply both main branches of NLP, Natural language understanding
(NLU) and NLG, to real-life situations. This is mainly due to the focus of pragmatics on the
study of language considering its context [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], which becomes crucial when analysing the natural
component of the human language. This is due to the wide range of (para)linguistic elements
that pragmatics considers, such as speakers’ intentions or their previously shared knowledge,
or the sociocultural context in which the message is generated, among other aspects.
      </p>
      <p>
        Consequently, the study of pragmatics from a computational perspective has become a need
that, despite the progress shown with the emergence of areas of research such as Computational
Pragmatics [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], there is still a long way to go. Moreover, the diversity of research areas in
which pragmatics is starting to be considered nowadays has fostered the inclusion of pragmatic
aspects of language inside some of the tasks related to natural language processing, such as
sentiment analysis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], document summarisation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] or rumour detection [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Pragmatics is also present in systems developed to generate natural text automatically. Indeed,
inside the document planning stage, the system takes into account the type of information that
needs to be included in the subsequent created text depending on factors such as the target
audience or the communicative intention. However, the approaches to this type of system are
usually enclosed in specific domains of application [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. A significant proportion of NLG systems
are focused on human-robot interaction so that the system can automatically understand the
speaker’s intentions [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ], but without teaching the system how to recognise the most appropriate
structure of the automatic text depending on the intention we want to determine for it.
      </p>
      <p>Therefore, our motivation for the present study arises from the need for such NLP systems to
include pragmatic aspects such as communicative intentions inside the tasks that focus on the
structure of processing and generation systems. In this manner, we pretend to test the added
value that the inclusion of this linguistic element in the structure of an NLP system could have,
as it could acquire more linguistic knowledge to fulfil further linguistic tasks as a whole. To
accomplish so, the main tasks to address in this thesis are the following:
• Taking as a base the taxonomy presented in the Speech Act Theory, classify a list of speech
act verbs according to their main communicative intention considering their meaning
• Tag a corpus including tweets extracted from Twitter API depending on the main
communicative intention they show following the previous verb classification
• Create an annotation scheme on communicative intentions taking as a model the corpus
already tagged
• Apply that annotation scheme to a linguistic corpus belonging to a particular genre to
test its performance
• Validate the annotation scheme by means of external annotators and evaluation metrics
to confirm its reliability
• Integrate the annotation scheme and the resulting corpus in an NLP application to add
further linguistic knowledge in its system, therefore increasing the tasks it can fulfil
The remainder of this article is organised as follows: Section 2 focuses on the diferent
approaches made in NLP in order to study pragmatic elements of language, then Section 3
shows the main hypotheses and objectives planned for this research. Subsequently, we explain
the methodology proposed for fulfilling each project task in Section 4, and Section 5 sets out the
diferent research issues that we may need to face throughout the development of the project.
Finally, the bibliography used for this study is included at the end of the paper.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related Work</title>
      <p>
        Despite the dificulties that the inclusion of pragmatic elements inside NLP and NLG systems
entailed, several researchers focused their study on this linguistic level to make progress in these
domains of computational linguistics [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref9">9, 10, 11</xref>
        ]. Therefore, there is currently a great number of
studies enriching their systems with pragmatic knowledge to improve their eficiency.
      </p>
      <p>A very prolific area of research is that devoted to the study of computer-mediated
communication [12], which comprises all the media included in the Web 2.0, thanks to the communicative
interactions it promotes with very varied tools such as Facebook or blog comments, retweets,
likes on YouTube and many more. Some of the tasks studied in these types of media are
analysing users’ feelings, just as Tian et al. [13] did on Facebook based on the idea that emoticons
reflect the intention of the message [ 14]. Inside the area of digital newspapers, Chen et al. [15]
focused on the identification of clickbait cues using several methods of analysis that included
the syntactic and pragmatic levels. As for Twitter, Saha et al. [16] and Zhang et al. [17] made
use of the Speech Act Theory (SAT) founded by Austin [18] and extended by Searle [19, 20] to
identify users’ intentions in their tweets, modifying the intention classification with several
linguistic features to apply machine learning algorithms to test their classification accuracy.</p>
      <p>Focusing on the SAT, which we already described in detail in the previous edition of this
Doctoral Symposium, its founder Austin [18] defended that language can serve as a means
to perform actions depending on the uttered message, investigating verbs to identify which
ones are able to denote actions on their own (called performative verbs) and those that only
describe reality (descriptive verbs). Subsequent to this first pragmatic division, Austin focused his
research on one of the elements that comprise the act of saying something, the illocutionary act.
With this element, he created a classification divided in 5 types of illocutionary acts depending
on the intention of the expressed message. However, many of the linguistic researchers that
studied this theory later on took as a basis the taxonomy proposed by Searle [19], which is
a more exhaustive and well delimited modification of Austin’s division. According to Searle,
communicative intentions can be classified in the following five categories:
• Assertives: by uttering them, we commit to the veracity of the message expressed. E.g.:
declare, manifest, conclude, explain, etc.;
• Directives: the speaker uses this type to make the listener do something. E.g.: ask for,
dare, invite, command, challenge, etc.;
• Commissives: they commit the speaker to do an action in the future. E.g.: swear, promise,
commit, intend, etc.;
• Expressives: they express the psychological state of the speaker with respect to a topic
specified in the message. E.g.: thank, forgive, excuse, congratulate, etc.;
• Declarations: when uttering them we get the content of the message to coincide with
reality, that is, by using them, the action is performed, or in Searle’s own words: ‘saying
makes it so’. E.g.: declare, designate, resign, marry, etc.</p>
      <p>Later on, Searle [20] also made a distinction between the types of intentions aforementioned,
known as direct speech acts because the relation between the meaning and the intention of the
message is clear, and other type of illocutionary acts called indirect speech acts. In this last type,
the relation between the message and the intention requires some other inferential processes in
order to successfully interpret the intention of the message —as in those messages containing
irony, sarcasm or rhetorical questions, among others—. The speech act taxonomy attracted
the research community in linguistics and many other fields, giving rise to diferent versions.
More concretely, in the NLG field, this classification meant a starting point for studying the
best approach to develop systems that could automatically identify text intentions [21].</p>
      <p>Nowadays, several authors have shown interest in the SAT taxonomy, focusing on the
annotation and classification of speech acts. This is the case of Martínez-Hinarejos et al. [22],
who used diferent statistical annotation models such as the N-Gram transducer model to
tag dialogue acts. Moreover, Caballero et al. [23] created a pragmatic-functional annotation
scheme of the FerroviELE corpus, with an in-depth explanation of the linguistic tags used to
annotate 41 communicative functions. Focusing also on clinical pragmatics, Gallardo Paúls and
Fernández Urquiza [24] applied the classification of illocutionary acts to pragmatically annotate
the PerLa corpus, which contains clinical oral data to analyse pathological language.</p>
      <p>Consequently, we base our study on these examples of pragmatic research because despite
the obsolescence that SAT could show nowadays, the recognition of communicative intentions
still attracts many diferent areas inside NLP. This is given by the general aim of processing
a greater number of linguistic nuances to obtain programmes that are able to identify those
linguistic particularities and therefore process a wider variety of text genres considering the
pragmatic nature of language.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Main hypothesis and objectives</title>
      <p>The present thesis is based on the hypothesis that it is possible to automatically annotate the
communicative intention of a given message by means of a representative and unambiguous
annotation scheme. Consequently, the purpose of this project is the creation of a communicative
intention annotation scheme that could serve as a model for the pragmatic annotation of several
NLP applications to broaden the linguistic scope of this area of research. By establishing an
annotation manual adaptable to diferent research purposes, NLP and NLG systems could be
further trained with pragmatic information to understand and classify diferent texts depending
on the particular intention they reflect. In this way, the improvement of those computational
systems with more heterogeneous information will foster the creation of processing systems
with more of the linguistic elements that make a text look natural, and therefore achieve one of
the multiple purposes of these research areas. To tackle this pragmatic subject within our PhD
research, we aim to answer the following research questions:
• Up to which point is it possible to identify the intention of a given message in Spanish?
• What NLP tools do we need to process and detect those intentions automatically?
• How to evaluate the annotation scheme to validate its efectiveness?
• In which NLP application should we implement our scheme to check its performance?</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Methodology and proposed experiment</title>
      <p>The proposed research is based on the application of the SAT in an annotation scheme that
could serve as a model for future NLP systems in order to automatically recognise and tag the
communicative intention of a particular message in a given corpus or application. Consequently,
for the purpose of our thesis, we will focus on Searle’s classification of direct speech acts as
explained in Section 2 and some other linguistic features that also reflect the intention of the
message in a straightforward way. To create the corresponding annotation scheme, several
linguistic resources and computing tools were used to collect the suficient linguistic information
that would serve as the base of the guidelines:</p>
      <p>• Anne Wierzbicka’s English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary [25]</p>
      <p>After consolidating the theoretical foundations of the SAT in the previous Doctoral
Symposium, the next step of the thesis was selecting an appropriate lexicon that contains a
considerable representation of the verbs comprised in Spanish to then include them in the annotation
scheme according to their essential communicative intention. In order to have a clear idea of
which verbs where going to be included in our classification of speech act verbs, we based our
selection on the verbs semantically analysed in [25]. This book describes in detail around 200 of
the most frequently speech act verbs used in the English language focusing on their particular
semantic meaning. In this way, by studying the semantic particularities of each English verb,
we were capable of looking for the equivalent verbs in Spanish that kept each semantic nuance
so that the speech act verb classification would not difer from one language to another.
• ADESSE: Base de datos de Verbos, Alternancias de Diátesis y Esquemas
Sintáctico</p>
      <p>Semánticos del Español [26]</p>
      <p>Along with the speech act classification described in [ 25], we also used for the creation of
our verb classification the online database ADESSE [ 26], created by the University of Vigo. This
online linguistic tool shows a Spanish verb and two-verb constructions database that includes a
syntactic and semantic analysis of those verbs inside the corpus Arthus. The corresponding
corpus contains 34 texts belonging to the narrative genre, including newspapers and theatre
plays, among others. Furthermore, ADESSE incorporates an scheme of the semantic classes in
which each verb analysed was included, which was of great help when matching the semantic
senses of the verbs analysed in [25] with those of the ADESSE database in Spanish, so we could
support our classification with oficial linguistic resources.</p>
      <p>• Shared Task on Hope Speech Detection for Equality, Diversity and Inclusion [27]
At the same time, a corpus of an adequate length was chosen to identify messages with a
particular communicative intention depending on the verb classification previously completed.
For this task, we first adopted the corpus published by the shared task competition on Hope
Speech Detection for Equality, Diversity and Inclusion [27]. This shared task includes a Spanish
dataset of LGBITQ-related tweets collected using the Twitter API from June 27, 2021 to July
26, 2021. Even though the purpose of the competition was to check the performance of the
diferent systems participating in the task when tagging the tweets that included or not hope
speech messages, we found this dataset quite suitable for our own research. This is because
many of the tweets gathered in the train dataset used several of those speech act verbs that we
had previously included in our classification.</p>
      <p>• Twitter API</p>
      <p>Nevertheless, as we started to tag the tweets depending on their intention, we realised that
we could not classify as many tweets as we considered appropriate to verify that our verb
classification was correct. Also, with the reduced number of tweets classified with this corpus,
we could not identify as many linguistic features that could also mark the communicative
intention of the message without ambiguities. For this reason, we extracted more tweets
through Twitter API using the same hashtags than in [27] to complete our first corpus of tweets
classified depending on their main communicative intention to gather more linguistic features.
4.1. Communicative intention annotation scheme
With the linguistic tools and the communicative intention classification already established,
the next part of our research, which is currently under development, focuses on creating the
annotation scheme. In this step of the thesis, we will gather the speech act verbs classification
apart from some other linguistic features found throughout the tagging of the tweets, which
also helped to a large extent to identify the central intention of our compiled tweets. Some of
these features linked to the Spanish language are verbal periphrases as "deber + infinitive verb "
(which would denote an obligation) and fixed Spanish expressions that substitute the meaning
of a particular verb in English, as in "agree" in comparison to "estar de acuerdo", among some
other features. The annotation scheme will also count with a section devoted to the parameters
and rules to consider for the intention annotation task of the linguistic features included in
our scheme. To ensure a clear and simple annotation performance, the scheme will show the
most representative usage examples of each intention so that, wherever possible, we avoid the
ambiguities expected in some annotated cases.</p>
      <p>Apart from the examples added in each intention to illustrate its annotation, as shown in
Table 1, the proposed annotation scheme will also contain a final glossary with every annotated
verb and its corresponding intention as a result of the previous annotation task. In this way, the
annotation scheme will also become a linguistic resource in future studies that want to focus on
the intentions applied to many areas within the field of NLP. Moreover, the annotation scheme
will have a technical section devoted to the tags chosen for the annotation task so that this stage
is performed in the most visual and mechanical way possible to create an efective annotation
system that can be implemented in an NLP programme. This technical section will also be
crucial for assessing the quality of our annotation scheme, as external annotators will be needed
in order to verify its accuracy. To do so, a special section devoted to evaluation metrics and the
inter-annotator agreement will also be included in the thesis to corroborate the reliability of
the communicative intention annotation scheme.</p>
      <p>• Experimentation
En nombre del colectivo #LGTBI de #Chivilcoy
agradecemos siempre la predisposición a la
escucha y a la acción para hacer un municipio
cada día más justo
FELIZ DIA DEL ORGULLO LGBTQ+ y a los
HETEROS ALIADOS les recordamos, ustedes
también forman parte de nosotros, gracias por
apoyar. #Orgullo2021 #pride #Orgullo
#OrgulloSiempre #OrgulloLGTBI #LGBT</p>
      <p>Annotated tweet
&lt;expres&gt; En nombre del colectivo #LGTBI
de #Chivilcoy &lt;vah_expres&gt; agradecemos
&lt;/vah_expres&gt; siempre la predisposición a la
escucha y a la acción para hacer un municipio
cada día más justo &lt;/expres&gt;
&lt;expres&gt; &lt;fra&gt; FELIZ DIA &lt;/fra&gt; DEL
ORGULLO LGBTQ+ &lt;/expres&gt; &lt;repre&gt; y a los
HETEROS ALIADOS les &lt;vah_repre&gt; recordamos
&lt;/vah_repre&gt;, ustedes también forman parte
de nosotros, &lt;/repre&gt; &lt;expres&gt; &lt;fra&gt; gracias
&lt;/fra&gt; por apoyar. #Orgullo2021 #pride
#Orgullo #OrgulloSiempre #OrgulloLGTBI #LGBT
&lt;/expres&gt;</p>
      <p>Finally, we will proceed to the experimentation of the annotation scheme in an NLP system
once it is validated. The real value of these guidelines is the variety of applications in which they
can be tested to broaden the number of actions an NLP system can successfully complete. In
this manner, our pragmatic scheme could help an NLG system to generate automatically created
text with a particular intention stated in it, which would help to a great extent to structure
the rest of the information we want to represent in the generated text. Apart from this, the
annotation scheme could be included in an already developed NLP application devoted to the
task of opinion mining. In this case, the scheme would be implemented as another section of
the application so that the system can recognise not only the opinion of a given message, but
also its main intention, as well as many other (para)linguistic aspects that would increase the
number of tasks that this particular system is capable of fulfilling. Furthermore, another lines
of future research could be focused on the application of our annotation guidelines into another
language or analysing which other pragmatic features could be also annotated in the corpus
resulting from our communicative intention annotation task.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Research issues to discuss</title>
      <p>Given the suggestions and comments received in the previous edition of the Doctoral Symposium,
we solved some of the research issues stated at the beginning of the thesis. However, as
an inherent part of this project, there are still several research questions to be discussed all
throughout the development of our annotation scheme:
• Should we avoid annotating Declarative verbs as they depend on more linguistic and
contextual information in order to be classified as such? (i.e., Who is expressing that verb
(his job), and to whom it is said, etc.)
• How much linguistic information is it interesting to include in the annotation scheme
apart from the speech act verbs to not worsen its performance?
• How many tweets are enough to check all the possible speech act verbs and other linguistic
features that may be added to the subsequent annotation scheme?
• How are we going to tackle the particularities of a computer-mediated type of
communication so singular as tweets? Spelling mistakes, punctuation mistakes, emojis, etc.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This research work is part of the R&amp;D project "PID2021-123956OB-I00", funded by MCIN/
AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ and by "ERDF A way of making Europe”. Moreover, it has been
partially funded by the Generalitat Valenciana through the project NL4DISMIS: Natural Language
Technologies for dealing with dis- and misinformation with grant reference (CIPROM/2021/21)".
[11] C. Bonial, L. Donatelli, M. Abrams, S. Lukin, S. Tratz, M. Marge, R. Artstein, D. Traum,
C. Voss, Dialogue-amr: abstract meaning representation for dialogue, in: Proceedings of
the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 2020, pp. 684–695.
[12] A. Georgakopoulou, Computer-mediated communication, in: J. Verschueren, J.-O.
Östman, J. Blommaert, C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Pragmatics in Practice, volume 9, John Benjamins
Publishing Co, 2011, pp. 93–110.
[13] Y. Tian, T. Galery, G. Dulcinati, E. Molimpakis, C. Sun, Facebook sentiment: Reactions
and emojis, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Natural Language
Processing for Social Media, ACL, 2017, pp. 11–16. doi:10.18653/v1/W17-1102.
[14] E. Dresner, S. C. Herring, Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary
force, Communication Theory 20 (2010) 249–268. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.
01362.x.
[15] Y. Chen, N. J. Conroy, V. L. Rubin, Misleading online content: recognizing clickbait as
"false news", in: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Workshop on Multimodal Deception
Detection, ACM, 2015, pp. 15–19. doi:10.1145/2823465.2823467.
[16] T. Saha, S. Saha, P. Bhattacharyya, Tweet act classification: A deep learning based classifier
for recognizing speech acts in twitter, in: 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural
Networks (IJCNN), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–8. doi:10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8851805.
[17] R. Zhang, D. Gao, W. Li, What are tweeters doing: Recognizing speech acts in twitter,
in: Workshops at the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011, pp.
86–91. URL: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/WS/AAAIW11/paper/view/3803.
[18] J. L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words, Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1962.
[19] J. R. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, volume 626, Cambridge</p>
      <p>University Press, 1969.
[20] J. R. Searle, Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts, Cambridge</p>
      <p>University Press, 1985.
[21] G. Briggs, M. Scheutz, A hybrid architectural approach to understanding and appropriately
generating indirect speech acts, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial
Intelligence, volume 27, 2013, pp. 1213–1219. URL: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/
article/view/8471.
[22] C. D. Martínez-Hinarejos, J. M. Benedí, V. Tamarit, Unsegmented dialogue act annotation
and decoding with n-gram transducers, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and
Language Processing 23 (2014) 198–211. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2014.2377595.
[23] M. Caballero, L. Díaz, M. Taulé, Guía de anotación del corpus FerroviELE, 2014.
[24] B. Gallardo Paúls, M. Fernández Urquiza, Etiquetado pragmático de datos clínicos, e-AESLA
(2015) 1–12.
[25] A. Wierzbicka, English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary, Academic Press, 1987.
[26] J. M. García-Miguel, F. González Domínguez, G. Vaamonde, I. Anaya, A. Huzum, V. Dacosta,
A. Rifón, ADESSE: Base de datos de Verbos, Alternancias de Diátesis y Esquemas
SintácticoSemánticos del Español, 2010. URL: http://adesse.uvigo.es/index.php.
[27] B. R. Chakravarthi, V. Muralidaran, R. Priyadharshini, S. C. Navaneethakrishnan, J. P.</p>
      <p>McCrae, M. Á. García-Cumbreras, S. M. Jiménez-Zafra, R. Valencia-García, Shared task
on hope speech detection for equality, diversity, and inclusion - ACL, 2022. URL: https:
//competitions.codalab.org/competitions/36393#learn_the_details-organizers.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Cherpas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Natural language processing, pragmatics, and verbal behavior</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The Analysis of Verbal Behavior</source>
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <year>1992</year>
          )
          <fpage>135</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>147</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/bf03392880.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Resende de Mendonça</surname>
          </string-name>
          , D. Felix de Brito, F. de Franco Rosa,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
            dos
            <surname>Reis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Bonacin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A framework for detecting intentions of criminal acts in social media: A case study on twitter</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Information</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>40</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/info11030154.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Sayers</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Sousa-Silva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Höhn</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Ahmedi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Allkivi-Metsoja</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Anastasiou</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Š. Beňuš,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Bowker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Bytyçi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Catala</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>The Dawn of the Human-Machine Era: A Forecast of New and Emerging Language Technologies</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Technical Report, EU COST Action</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          . URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03230287.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Mahler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Cheung</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Elsner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>King</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.-C. de Marnefe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shain</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stevens-Guille</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>White</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Breaking</surname>
            <given-names>NLP</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Using morphosyntax, semantics, pragmatics and world knowledge to fool sentiment analysis systems</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Building Linguistically Generalizable NLP Systems</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>33</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>39</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Mukhedkar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Sakhare</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Kumar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Pragmatic analysis based document summarization</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
          <fpage>145</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>149</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kumar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Sangwan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Nayyar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Rumour veracity detection on twitter using particle swarm optimized shallow classifiers</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Multimedia Tools and Applications</source>
          <volume>78</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>24083</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>24101</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s11042-019-7398-6.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Gatt</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Krahmer,
          <article-title>Survey of the state of the art in natural language generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research</source>
          <volume>61</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <fpage>65</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>170</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1613/jair.5477.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Garoufi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Planning-based models of natural language generation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Language and Linguistics Compass</source>
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>10</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1111/lnc3.
          <fpage>12053</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Mann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Toward a Speech Act Theory for Natural Language Processing</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Technical Report, University of Southern California Marina del Rey Information Science Inst</source>
          ,
          <year>1980</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Herring</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Stein</surname>
          </string-name>
          , T. Virtanen,
          <article-title>Introduction to the pragmatics of computer-mediated communication</article-title>
          , in: Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, De Gruyter Mouton,
          <year>2013</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>32</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1515/9783110214468.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>