<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Scafolding self-regulated learning with CBLES,
[</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cae.22337</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Measuring and supporting self-regulated learning in blended learning contexts</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Esteban Villalobos</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mar Pérez-Sanagustin</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>André Tricot</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Julien Broisin</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>IRIT, Université de Toulouse</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>CNRS, Toulouse INP, UT3, Toulouse</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="FR">France</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3, EPSYLON</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2019</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>28</volume>
      <issue>2012</issue>
      <fpage>446</fpage>
      <lpage>455</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Despite the positive efects of Blended Learning (BL), several studies have shown that students require high levels of selfregulation to succeed in these types of practices. Still, there is little understanding of how students organize their learning in BL authentic contexts. This paper presents the objectives and current status of a project that seeks to understand how students' Self-regulated Learning (SRL) strategies manifest themselves in BL contexts holistically and how to foster it through technological solutions. The contributions of this project will be three-fold. First, we aim to develop novel analytical and technological solutions to understand better the dynamics of how self-regulated learning unveils in BL contexts. Second is the development of a dashboard-based support tool for students and teachers. And third, we will provide evaluations of the analytical framework and support tool in authentic BL contexts. We expect that these contributions will provide the community with a better understanding of the dynamics of SRL in BL.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Self-regulated Learning</kwd>
        <kwd>Blended Learning</kwd>
        <kwd>Learning Analytics</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Objectives and research questions</title>
      <p>Researchers have proposed diferent approaches to
support students’ SRL processes [19]. The most common
The general objective of this project is to investigate the approaches explored are educational prompts and
inteSRL strategies used by learners in BL scenarios and to grated support systems [20]. These solutions transform
propose and evaluate a Learning Analytics (LA) techno- raw data into ‘actionable insights’ to produce behavioral
logical solution based on user-centered dashboards (for changes in the students [21]. So far, most of this prior
teachers and students) to support those strategies that work has been conducted in online settings, such in
Masmaximize learners’ performance. Three main objectives sive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), in which students
are derived from this general objective: have low interaction with the teacher [20]. These
studies suggest that dashboards could be an appropriate
ap• Objective 1: To propose an analytical framework proach for supporting SRL strategies. In particular, the
to study in a holistic manner how students’ SRL strategies of goal setting, strategic planning, time
manstrategies manifest in BL contexts. agement, and monitoring have been shown to be more
• Objective 2: To design a LA dashboard-based efective for promoting students’ motivation and impact
solution for teachers and students to support SRL on course performance.</p>
      <p>in BL. There are still very few studies looking at these
solu• Objective 3: To evaluate the impact of LA solu- tions BL contexts (e.g., [22, 23]). These works in BL have
tion on students’ learning strategies and teachers’ two main limitations. First, the tools focus on
supportdecision-making in BL scenarios. ing the students directly, usually overlooking the role
of the teacher. Second, while some tools are based on
2.1. Measuring SRL in BL theoretical models for SRL, there is still much to
understand about their impact on students’ SRL strategies. This
posses the following research questions for the project:</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Diferent methods have been proposed for studying how</title>
        <p>SRL manifests in diferent learning contexts, especially in
online learning environments. These range from using
self reported data [15] to detecting tactics and
strategies by using the trace data collected from the course’s
LMS [16, 7, 17, 18, 9]. The latter has seen many
contributions from the field of Learning Analytics (LA). Some
examples of these analytical approaches have used
techniques derived from temporal analysis and sequence
mining [17, 16]. Some studies have also made the connection
between these techniques and the SRL theory [16]. Fan
et al. [16] suggests this theoretical backbone may allow
us to overcome the limitations of the context-specific
nature of LA to perform pedagogical interventions that
go beyond course setting.</p>
        <p>Most of these methods have been applied in online
settings, and very few have been applied in Blended
Learning settings. The currently applied methods are limited in
capturing the impact of factors such as teacher
interventions and face-to-face classes. In fact, current research
applying existing methods in Blended Learning
encounters dificulties in providing indicators on run-time, as
well as in giving a temporal meaning to the collected data.
From this, we derive the following research question:
• RQ1: How can pre-existing LA methods and
techniques be adapted and combined with qualitative
• RQ2: How useful (interpretable, actionable, and
comprehensive) are the existing indicators
provided in the SRL-support dashboard for students
and teachers?
• RQ3: How do SRL support tools influence
students’ strategies and teachers’ decision-making
in BL scenarios?</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Project Methodology</title>
      <p>Design Based Research (DBR) will be used as a
methodological approach, which combines experiments in
realworld settings with theoretical models [24]. The
interventions will be based on the NoteMyProgress (NMP)
tool [25], a Moodle plug-in that delivers dashboards with
self-regulation indicators in the course to both students
and teachers (see Figure 1). Three experimental cycles
will be carried out to improve the tool and the analytical
frameworks in an iterative way. After each cycle, the
results will be published as part of the LASER project
following an Open Science Framework.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Current Results: First Design</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Cycle</title>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>The first cycle focused on studying students’ behavior in</title>
        <p>BL. This cycle had three research questions:</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>1. How do students’ learning tactics and strategies</title>
        <p>manifest along the BL course?
2. Does the NMP tool, designed to support students’
SRL, have an efect on their learning tactics and
strategies?
3. Is there a relationship between students’ learning
strategies, course performance, and SRL ability
profile?</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-3">
        <title>This intervention took place between September 2021</title>
        <p>and January 2022. The study consisted on 241 students
from two university courses. At the beginning of the
course, students completed the informed consent for
participation and a questionnaire to assess their level of SRL.</p>
        <p>Midway through the course (week 6), they were
introduced to NMP and invited to refer to it to assess their
study strategies [27]. At the end of the course, they were
asked to complete a questionnaire on their sense-making
of the tool [25].</p>
        <p>The evaluation of one of these courses is detailed in We found that students’ strategies were correlated
[26]. Here, we extended an analytical approach proposed with their previous achievements (GPA) and their
selfin Fincham et al. [17] and analyzed the results with re- reported Self-Regulation ability. We also found that the
spect to students’ SRL ability profile, final performance, tactics used by the students varied across modalities and
and previous achievements. The approach consists of the
following steps:
1. Separating the activity of the students into
sessions. These correspond to a sequence of
actions not separated by more than 30 minutes
of inactivity.
2. Detecting the underlying tactic of each
session. A tactic is defined as the underlying
process that a student is applying in a given period
of time [17]. We used a Hidden Markov Model
(HMM) in order to detect students’ tactics.
3. Detecting students’ strategies. Under the
analytical approach proposed by Fincham et al. [17],
strategies are defined as sequences of tactics
applied by the students. In order to include the
context of the BL course, we included in this model
the timing with respect to the face-to-face
sessions.
4. Analyzing relationships between strategies
and students’ profile . We analyzed how
diferent tactics and strategies applied by the students
related to their SRL ability profile, course
performance, and previous achievements.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>5. Future work: Second Design</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Cycle</title>
      <p>This work aims at advancing research in TEL, and in
particular in the study of SRL in BL scenarios, with three
contributions. Firstly, we expect to provide the
community with an analytical framework for understanding the
dynamics of SRL in BL in a holistic manner and taking
into consideration temporal aspects. These tools will help</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This paper has been partially funded by the ANR LASER
(156322). The authors acknowledge PROF-XXI, which
is an Erasmus+ Capacity Building in the Field of Higher
Education project funded by the European Commission
(609767-EPP-1-2019-1- ES-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP). This
publication reflects the views only of the authors and funders
cannot be held responsible for any use which may be
made of the information contained therein.
in analyzing data but also in proposing indicators that
could serve researchers doing interventions on run-time.
Second, we contribute with the NMP tool, a functional
tool that both teachers and students could use to support
SRL, and its evaluation in authentic contexts. The
current version of the tool is already openly available1. And
third, we expect to contribute with exemplary scenarios
on how to apply our analytical framework in BL.</p>
      <p>These contributions will have implications at the
theoretical level, the analytical level, and the teaching
practices level. We expect that our analytical framework and
proposed tool can give the community greater insights
into how to understand the diferent factors that afect
the dynamics of SRL in BL. We hope that this allows the
community to have a better understanding of how to
support SRL in a holistic manner.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>