<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>environment using prompts and learning analytics</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sabina Rako</string-name>
          <email>sabina.rako@srce.hr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Diana Šimić</string-name>
          <email>diana.simic@foi.unizg.hr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Bart Rienties</string-name>
          <email>bart.rienties@open.ac.uk</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Open University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Milton Keynes MK7 6AA</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UK">United Kingdom</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Zagreb Faculty of organization and informatics</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Pavlinska 2, Varazdin, 42000</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="HR">Croatia</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>University of Zagreb University Computing Centre</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Josipa Marohnica 5, Zagreb, 10000</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="HR">Croatia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Higher education institutions, teachers, and students face new difficulties and opportunities resulting from the introduction of modern technology into the learning process. The widespread of learning environments that integrate online learning and face-to-face learning may pose some opportunities as well as difficulties for some groups of students' self-regulation skills. Providing automated prompts may help to support those students with insufficient self-regulation skills. The use of learning analytics and multiple methods and data sources (data triangulation) may give better insight into the self-regulation process. The objective of the proposed research is to explore the students' evaluation of the usefulness of prompts implemented in a blended learning environment. A secondary objective is to develop and evaluate a real-time dashboard designed to notify teachers of student responses to deployed prompts. The research methodology will be grounded in action research and empirical research. The scientific contribution will be achieved through the development of artefacts and the performance of empirical research to advance understanding of the student's self-regulation in a blended learning environment. learning analytics, self-regulated learning, prompts, blended learning, dashboards, higher Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, September 12-16,</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>education</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        In the past two decades, blended learning in
higher
education
has
been
increasingly
widespread [1]. The effectiveness of blended
learning in relation to traditional learning is
continuously reviewed [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2">2,3</xref>
        ]. Recently, Müller
and
      </p>
      <p>
        Mildenberger [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">4</xref>
        ] conducted a
metaanalysis of scientific papers published from
2008 to 2019 and found that identical learning
outcomes were achieved in blended learning as
in a conventional classroom setting, with a
reduction of time spent in physical space by 30
to 79% (division according to Allen et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">5</xref>
        ]).
Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of Seventeenth European
      </p>
      <p>2022 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative
identify
for</p>
      <p>which
(or
disciplines)
a
learning format is most appropriate.
specific
blended</p>
      <p>
        Several teachers and institutions strive to
develop personalised learning approaches in an
effort to meet the needs of each student to the
greatest extent possible. To be able to customise
the approach, it is necessary to examine the
views and habits of students. For example,
information systems deployed in the teaching
and learning process are sources of valuable
educational data that may be used to monitor
and assess the teaching and learning process
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">6</xref>
        ], and play a vital part in the development of
personalised solutions.
      </p>
      <p>
        Learning analytics as a research area is
focused on the "measurement, collection,
analysis and reporting of data about learners
and their contexts, for purposes of
understanding and optimising learning and the
environments in which it occurs" [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">7</xref>
        ]. The
implementation of learning analytics is a
complex process that requires capability
building and certain specific competencies of
stakeholders in the education system. In
practice, learning analytics examples can be
found at several levels (e.g., students, courses,
programmes, institutions, and consortiums of
institutions) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">8</xref>
        ]. When applying learning
analytics, technology should be used wisely
taking into account existing educational
concepts and research knowledge [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Tsai et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">10</xref>
        ] provided an overview of
trends and limits in the deployment of learning
analytics in the European higher education
system. According to their research, teachers
and teaching staff are the primary users of
learning analytics, and there is limited evidence
of active engagement with students and the use
of learning analytics to improve self-regulated
learning skills.
      </p>
      <p>
        Self-regulated learning includes cognitive,
metacognitive, behavioural, motivational, and
emotional aspects of learning. This area has
been extensively researched in the field of
educational psychology, and among the best
known and most applied models is the
Zimmerman’s model of self-regulated learning,
that consists of three main phases: (a)
forethought, (b) performance, and (c)
selfreflection [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">11</xref>
        ]. Wong et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">12</xref>
        ] in a systematic
review of self-regulated learning in an online
environment and massive open online courses
(MOOCs) demonstrated the need for further
research of self-regulated learning in an online
environment, particularly through an empirical
approach. Furthermore, Viberg et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">13</xref>
        ]
examined empirical research in which learning
analytics were used to improve self-regulated
learning and concluded that few studies related
to the self-reflection phase of the Zimmerman
model, and that the majority of research focused
on measuring self-regulated learning and less
on support.
      </p>
      <p>
        In previous research, feedback and prompts
have been identified as the most important
elements that encourage self-regulated learning
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">12</xref>
        ]. Prompts are “visual, textual, or spoken
elements that the teacher uses to encourage
understanding and are most often in a form of
questions, although they can also be formulated
in the form of advice or instructions” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">14</xref>
        ].
Another definition of prompts is “short hints or
questions presented to students in order to
activate knowledge, strategies or skills that
students have already available but do not use”
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">15</xref>
        ]. Additionally, students do not usually
manifest self-regulated behaviour
spontaneously without guidance [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">16</xref>
        ]. Despite
the fact that the research revealed a number of
potential advantages of prompts for
selfregulated learning, Schumacher and Ifenthaler
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">17</xref>
        ] reported that learning analytics approaches
have not been thoroughly examined during
prompt implementation, and that future studies
should also focus on the student’s responses to
prompts.
      </p>
      <p>The proposed research will also consider
learning design as an important element in
educational interventions.</p>
      <p>Specifically, these research questions will
drive the proposed research.</p>
      <p>RQ1: To what extent are students aware of
self-regulation elements, such as metacognitive
activities before/during/after learning,
environmental structuring, help seeking, and
time management in the blended learning
environment?</p>
      <p>RQ2: In a blended learning environment,
which types of prompts (cognitive,
metacognitive, motivational, or
contentrelated) do groups of students find most useful?</p>
      <p>RQ3: Is there a difference in perceived
usefulness of the same type of prompt based on
the mode of learning (online and face-to-face)?</p>
      <p>RQ4: How does the implementation of
specific prompts affect
(a) student’s engagement
(b) results achieved in formative
assessment
(c) overall learning satisfaction?</p>
      <p>What distinctions exist amongst student
groups?</p>
      <p>RQ5: Which components of the real-time
dashboard for displaying student feedback on
prompt implementation are important to
students and/or teachers?</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2. Methodology</title>
      <p>
        This proposed research will utilise a
mixedmethod practical action research design.
According to Creswell [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">18</xref>
        ], action research is
used to address specific, practical issues that
seek solutions to a problem, and both
quantitative and qualitative methods may be
employed. Somekh [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">19</xref>
        ] proposes a four-step
process for action research: planning, acting,
observing, and reflecting. The proposed
activities in each action research step and key
artefacts are shown in Figure 1. Several
research methods, including descriptive
statistics, natural language processing methods
(open-ended questions), statistical analysis, and
nonparametric tests, will be utilised for data
analysis. For statistical analysis, the statistical
programming language R [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">20</xref>
        ] will be used.
2.1.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Planning</title>
      <p>The initial literature review showed the
research gap in the area of learning analytics
approaches in investigating prompts for
supporting students’ self-regulation. During the
preparation phase, an additional literature
review will be conducted to synthesise the
findings of prior research, identify appropriate
measurement instruments, and provide an
overview of the outcomes of prior empirical
interventions.</p>
      <p>The intervention will be designed as an
iterative process, with a pilot trial followed by
the main study. The interventions are intended
to be implemented at two higher education
institutions in Croatia, aiming to target around
340 students and 3 teachers. Ethical approval
from participating higher education institutions
will be obtained.</p>
      <p>Teachers will be closely involved in
preparations for implementation (analysis of
current learning design of a course, defining
specific goals of prompt implementation,
finding appropriate learning types, and defining
prompts based on selected models).</p>
      <p>During this phase, the appropriate
measurement instruments will be evaluated
(linguistic evaluation) or, if necessary, a new
measurement instrument will be developed.
2.2.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Acting</title>
      <p>This activity is a key component of the
research proposal. During this phase, the
developed artefacts will be used in the real
environment.</p>
      <p>
        The dominant research method used will be
pretest-posttest nonequivalent groups design, a
type of quasi-experimental design. One group
of students will be exposed to an intervention,
while the other group will not. The two groups
will then be compared. According to previous
research [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">21</xref>
        ], in order to eliminate confounding
variables, the duration of exposure should not
be excessively long (preferably 2 - 4 weeks).
Before the intervention, a priori statistical
power analysis will be conducted to determine
the required number of outcome observations.
      </p>
      <p>During this stage, the measurement
instruments will be evaluated in a real
environment.
2.3.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Observing</title>
      <p>In this phase, monitoring activities and
providing teachers with adequate technical
support will be the primary activities. Data will
be collected via system logs, measurement
instruments and prompt feedback.</p>
      <p>To monitor student progress, teachers will
have access to a real-time dashboard with
visualisations of student responses.
2.4.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Reflecting</title>
      <p>Teachers will receive the intervention
results during the phase of reflection. In
addition, they will assess the real-time
dashboard that was accessible during the
observing phase.</p>
      <p>
        In addition, a think-aloud protocol [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">22</xref>
        ] will
be implemented to collect specific information
about students' and teachers’ experiences with
prompt implementations.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>3. Current results</title>
      <p>A literature review with the focus on
available measurement instruments
(selfregulated learning, engagement, satisfaction
and other relevant constructs) is currently in
progress.</p>
      <p>Based upon the initial reading of the
literature and good practice identified, a
prototype of plug-in for prompt implementation
has been developed in Moodle LMS Platform
(Figure 2). The plug-in makes it possible to
embed prompts wherever an HTML editor is
available.</p>
      <p>Prototype of teacher’s dashboard has been
also developed (Figure 3).</p>
      <p>In order to test the feasibility of the proposed
study, pre-pilot study has been conducted. 38
students gave consent to participate in the
prepilot study. The students were second-year
students of the informatology programme at the
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. 36
out of 38 students were female, while two were
male.</p>
      <p>Lessons learned from the pre-pilot study:
• the suggested plug-in is appropriate for
prompt implementation and gives
considerable design flexibility with
respect to learning design
• students are more likely to rate prompts
during face-to-face meetings than
during online sessions
• the teacher acknowledged the
advantages of monitoring student
responses, and the input gained could be
useful for designing course
improvements
• think-aloud sessions conducted with
two students gave valuable insights into
the perception of implemented prompts
• adjustment of rating scale should be
considered (10 or 7-level scale)
•
it would be useful to collect additional
demographic information in order to
better understand behavioural
differences among students.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>4. Contribution to TEL domain</title>
      <p>The expected contributions of the proposed
research to the Technology Enhanced Learning
(TEL) domain are:
• synthesis of empirical interventions and
the results on supporting self-regulated
learning with prompts using learning
analytics in a blended learning
environment
• development and evaluation of artefacts
related to prompt implementation in real
environment
• better understanding of students’
selfregulation in blended learning
environment using prompts
• results of empirical research on
supporting self-regulated learning in
blended learning environment using
prompts and learning analytics. After
completing experimental part of the
proposed research, differences across
student groups can be expected in terms
of student engagement, formative
assessment outcomes, and overall
learning satisfaction. The combination
of accessible students' demographic
information with their responses and
system data will provide insight into
students' self-regulation practises and
awareness.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>5. Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This work has been fully supported by the
Croatian Science Foundation under the project
IP-2020-02-5071.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>6. References</title>
      <p>[1] M. Lundin, A. Bergviken Rensfeldt, T.</p>
      <p>Hillman, A. Lantz-Andersson, L. Peterson,
Higher education dominance and siloed
knowledge: a systematic review of flipped
classroom research, International Journal
of Educational Technology in Higher
Education 20 (2018). doi:
10.1186/s41239-018-0101-6</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Bernard</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Borokhovski,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.F.</given-names>
            <surname>Schmid</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Tamim</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.C.</given-names>
            <surname>Abrami</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Computing in Higher Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>26</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2014</year>
          ),
          <fpage>87</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>122</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s12528-013- 9077-3
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. Anthony</given-names>
            <surname>Jr.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kamaludin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Romli</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.F.M.</given-names>
            <surname>Raffei</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Nincarean A/L Eh Phon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Abdullah</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.L.</given-names>
            <surname>Ming</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.A.</given-names>
            <surname>Shukor</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.S.</given-names>
            <surname>Nordin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Baba</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Exploring the role of blended learning for teaching and learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning: An empirical investigation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Education and Information Technologies</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>24</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>6</issue>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>3433</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3466</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s10639-019-09941-z
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Müller</surname>
          </string-name>
          , T. Mildenberger,
          <article-title>Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Educational Research Review</source>
          , Volume
          <volume>34</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ),
          <source>ISSN 1747- 938X. doi: 10</source>
          .1016/j.edurev.
          <year>2021</year>
          .100394
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.E.</given-names>
            <surname>Allen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Seaman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Garrett</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States</article-title>
          , Newsburyport, MA: Sloan Consortium (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Siemens</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Learning Analytics: The Emergence of a Discipline</source>
          , American Behavioral Scientist,
          <volume>57</volume>
          (
          <issue>10</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
          <fpage>1380</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1400</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1177/0002764213498851
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Society</surname>
          </string-name>
          for Learning Analytics Research, What is Learning Analytics?, Society for Learning Analytics, [Online]. Available: https://www.solaresearch.org/about/whatis-learning-analytics/ [Accessed, June 29,
          <year>2021</year>
          ]
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tyton</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Learning analytics strategy toolkit</article-title>
          , [Online], Available: https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/ resources/learning-analytics-strategytoolkit/ [Accessed, June 29,
          <year>2021</year>
          ]
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Gašević</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Dawson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Siemens,
          <article-title>Let's not forget: Learning analytics are about learning</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Techtrends</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>59</volume>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
          <fpage>64</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>71</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s11528-014-0822-x
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Tsai</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Rates</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Moreno-Marcos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Muñoz-Merino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Jivet</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Scheffel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Drachsler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Kloos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Gašević</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Learning analytics in European higher education-Trends and barriers</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computers &amp; Education</source>
          , Volume
          <volume>155</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ),
          <fpage>103933</fpage>
          . ISSN 0360-
          <lpage>1315</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.compedu.
          <year>2020</year>
          .103933
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Panadero</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Frontiers in Psychology 8, Article</source>
          <volume>422</volume>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Wong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Baars</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Van Der Zee</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Houben</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Paas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Supporting SelfRegulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and MOOCs: A Systematic Review</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of HumanComputer Interaction</source>
          <volume>35</volume>
          :
          <fpage>4</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>5</lpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <fpage>356</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>373</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Viberg</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Khalil</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Baars, SelfRegulated Learning and Learning Analytics in Online Learning Environments: A Review of Empirical Research</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the 10th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference</source>
          , LAK'20,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Association</surname>
          </string-name>
          for Computing Machinery, New York, NY,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>173</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>186</lpage>
          . ISBN:
          <fpage>978</fpage>
          -1-
          <fpage>4503</fpage>
          -7712-6
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>British</surname>
            <given-names>Council</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Prompts, British Council,[Online]. Available: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/articl e/prompts [Accessed, Jun.
          <volume>27</volume>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          ]
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Wirth</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Promoting self-regulated learning through prompts</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie</source>
          ,
          <volume>23</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
          <fpage>91</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>94</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Sonnenberg</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Bannert, Evaluating the impact of instructional support using data mining and process mining: A microlevel analysis of the effectiveness of metacognitive prompts</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Educational Data Mining</source>
          ,
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
          <fpage>51</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>83</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Schumacher</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Ifenthaler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Investigating prompts for supporting students' self-regulation - A remaining challenge for learning analytics approaches?</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The Internet and Higher Education</source>
          , Volume
          <volume>49</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.iheduc.
          <year>2020</year>
          .100791
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
            <surname>Creswell</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and
          <article-title>Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, fourth edition</article-title>
          , Pearson,
          <year>2012</year>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Somekh</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Action Research:
          <article-title>A Methodology for Change and Development, 1st edition</article-title>
          , Open University Press,
          <year>2005</year>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R Core</given-names>
            <surname>Team</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>R:</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A language and environment for statistical computing</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          . URL: https://www.R-project.org/
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Zheng</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The effectiveness of selfregulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: a meta-analysis</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Asia Pacific Educ. Rev</source>
          .
          <volume>17</volume>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
          <fpage>187</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>202</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s12564-016-9426
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
            <surname>Fonteyn</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Kuipers</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Grobe</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Qualitative Health Research</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>3</volume>
          , issue 4 (
          <year>1993</year>
          )
          <fpage>430</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>441</lpage>
          , doi: 10.1177/104973239300300403
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>