<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Entomophagy: Young Consumers' Beliefs and Potential Attitude Towards Alternative Protein Sources - Abstract</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Christina Kleisiari</string-name>
          <email>chkleisiari@uth.gr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Georgios Kleftodimos</string-name>
          <email>kleftodimos@iamm.fr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>George Vlontzos</string-name>
          <email>gvlontzos@uth.gr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Agricultural Sciences</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Fitokou str., 38446, Volos</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Entomophagy</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Insects, Neophobia, Consumer Behavior, Health Belief Model, Alternative</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Mende</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>34090, Montpellier</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="FR">France</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>University of Montpellier, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Montpellier (CIHEAM-IAMM)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>3191 Rte de</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4">
          <label>4</label>
          <institution>University of Thessaly, Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, School of</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>1</kwd>
        <kwd>proteins</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Summary
Entomophagy can be considered as an alternative protein source substituting traditional
animal-based proteins. Benefits related to this are minimal requirements in water and land and
lower greenhouse gas emissions. Although insects have been part of Asian, African and Latin
American people’s diets, in Western societies consumption of whole or processed insects is
viewed with distrust and doubt, usually causing negative emotions. The present survey
attempts to identify and analyze the factors affecting the final choice and preference of young
consumers for insect eating. Thus, based on the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned
Behavior, a questionnaire was created and distributed to 343 consumers aged 18-45. Principal
Component Analysis results verified that young consumers recognize the benefits derived from
entomophagy (high nutritional value, environmental protection, their contribution to food
insecurity). More specifically, participants believe that they would adopt entomophagy mainly
due to low environmental footprint, nutritional value and taste. The nutritional value seems to
be a priority over the above reasons, while they seem to be less concerned about the low cost
(only 4% of the respondents). Moreover, they recognize potential hazards relevant to insects’
consumption, including microbiological and chemical risks as well as the possibility of an
allergic reaction. Another interesting finding is that the higher the percentage of plant proteins
consumed by the respondents, the less they identify risks arising from insects’ consumption.
In contrast, there is a high correlation (p- value &lt;0.01) between animal protein intake and
confidence in insect eating. From</p>
      <p>the analysis of the respondents΄ socio-economic
characteristics, consumers of lower educational level believe on a higher level that purchasing
costs of buying insects or insect-based food products are high. Greater willingness to purchase
insect-based foods was observed in male respondents compared to female ones. It is also
noteworthy that the majority of respondents had limited knowledge about entomophagy and
were not fully informed about the positive health benefits of this type of foodstuff. Regarding
the form of insect-based foods and products that were most likely to be selected, whole insects,
as well as desserts with whole insects, would be less preferred. On the contrary, processed
foodstuff such as spaghetti, cookies, flour, bars or burgers, are more acceptable as they are
more familiar to consumers. In conclusion, although food neophobia is the most important
limiting factor to insect consumption, consumers are gradually adopting more sustainable food
choices and protein alternatives, aiming to reduce animal protein intake.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>